<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hosed.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancynall.com/2003/12/21/hosed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancynall.com/2003/12/21/hosed/</link>
	<description>one writer's daily download</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nance</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2003/12/21/hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Nance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.88.31.129/nancy/2003/12/21/hosed/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Maureen,



Yeah, I did like it. If one of the purposes of art is to make us look at familiar things around us in a new way, then yes, "Angels in America" fills the bill. But what I really responded to is the &lt;em&gt;life&lt;/em&gt; in it, and that's why I get very frustrated with right-wing critics who dismiss it as a piece of left-wing political agitprop. An angry gay man seeking to explain, to himself and to the rest of the world, what AIDS did to his community at a specific time in history, might have turned out a pissed-off, angry lecture, and "Angels" is anything but. It's pissed-off, but it's also funny, searching, incisive, intelligent and -- dare I speak the cliche? -- life-affirming.



So it's pretty annoying to hear conservative nit-pickers say, "There's &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; evidence Roy Cohn used his Washington connections to score a personal supply of the best pharmaceutical hope for a treatment and hoarde it in a locked refrigerator in his hospital room!" No, but the play's subtitle is "A Gay Fantasia on National Themes," and Cohn was, demonstrably enough, an awful human being capable of just that. If there were a conservative Hollywood, I shudder to think of what the movies and plays about Bill Clinton will try in search of a larger truth. 



Anyway, complaining about politics in art is silly, whether it's Angels or Mel Gibson's Jesus movie. I'm just amused by conservative whining about lefty playwrights, directors, actors and other artistic types. Do I walk into my bank and bitch there are no liberal bankers? Send your kids to NYU film school and then complain.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maureen,</p>
<p>Yeah, I did like it. If one of the purposes of art is to make us look at familiar things around us in a new way, then yes, &#8220;Angels in America&#8221; fills the bill. But what I really responded to is the <em>life</em> in it, and that&#8217;s why I get very frustrated with right-wing critics who dismiss it as a piece of left-wing political agitprop. An angry gay man seeking to explain, to himself and to the rest of the world, what AIDS did to his community at a specific time in history, might have turned out a pissed-off, angry lecture, and &#8220;Angels&#8221; is anything but. It&#8217;s pissed-off, but it&#8217;s also funny, searching, incisive, intelligent and &#8212; dare I speak the cliche? &#8212; life-affirming.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s pretty annoying to hear conservative nit-pickers say, &#8220;There&#8217;s <em>no</em> evidence Roy Cohn used his Washington connections to score a personal supply of the best pharmaceutical hope for a treatment and hoarde it in a locked refrigerator in his hospital room!&#8221; No, but the play&#8217;s subtitle is &#8220;A Gay Fantasia on National Themes,&#8221; and Cohn was, demonstrably enough, an awful human being capable of just that. If there were a conservative Hollywood, I shudder to think of what the movies and plays about Bill Clinton will try in search of a larger truth. </p>
<p>Anyway, complaining about politics in art is silly, whether it&#8217;s Angels or Mel Gibson&#8217;s Jesus movie. I&#8217;m just amused by conservative whining about lefty playwrights, directors, actors and other artistic types. Do I walk into my bank and bitch there are no liberal bankers? Send your kids to NYU film school and then complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2003/12/21/hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 07:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.88.31.129/nancy/2003/12/21/hosed/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Since we all want to respect the RIAA, and only download songs legally, then we would never, ever want to use a tool like Poisoned.



Poisoned is a multiple-network downloading tool that allows you to easily and quickly find files anywhere on several networks and share them.  It runs on OS X.



So we would never, ever want to use Poisoned.  Ever.



Actually, I'll usually look in the iTMS first, but when they don't even have Tennessee Ernie Ford, come on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we all want to respect the RIAA, and only download songs legally, then we would never, ever want to use a tool like Poisoned.</p>
<p>Poisoned is a multiple-network downloading tool that allows you to easily and quickly find files anywhere on several networks and share them.  It runs on OS X.</p>
<p>So we would never, ever want to use Poisoned.  Ever.</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;ll usually look in the iTMS first, but when they don&#8217;t even have Tennessee Ernie Ford, come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2003/12/21/hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 04:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.88.31.129/nancy/2003/12/21/hosed/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>I vote get a new iMac (or whatever you want). Our vintage iMac (1999) died this fall. The resident mad computer scientist wanted to fix it. The teenager who shared it with him, backed up by mom (me), said "get a new one". (My life was affected only in that I had to share my powerbook with them for the duration but that was enough!) Computer Medic said $400. A quote for 1999 iMac's on eBay was $100. 



We "couldn't afford it" but we did buy a new iMac. We're all happy. The mad computer scientist promptly loaded all of his music into iTunes. The teenager was ecstatic that she could download something like 67 songs (legally, she tells me) in 5 minutes. I don't have to share any more.



We may still decide to fix the old one. I'm not sure why. We'll probably use it about as much as we use the old PowerMac/PC in the basement or the Apple II+ that still works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote get a new iMac (or whatever you want). Our vintage iMac (1999) died this fall. The resident mad computer scientist wanted to fix it. The teenager who shared it with him, backed up by mom (me), said &#8220;get a new one&#8221;. (My life was affected only in that I had to share my powerbook with them for the duration but that was enough!) Computer Medic said $400. A quote for 1999 iMac&#8217;s on eBay was $100. </p>
<p>We &#8220;couldn&#8217;t afford it&#8221; but we did buy a new iMac. We&#8217;re all happy. The mad computer scientist promptly loaded all of his music into iTunes. The teenager was ecstatic that she could download something like 67 songs (legally, she tells me) in 5 minutes. I don&#8217;t have to share any more.</p>
<p>We may still decide to fix the old one. I&#8217;m not sure why. We&#8217;ll probably use it about as much as we use the old PowerMac/PC in the basement or the Apple II+ that still works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen McDaid</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2003/12/21/hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen McDaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.88.31.129/nancy/2003/12/21/hosed/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>You liked it??!!



I am an ideological outsider, having never voted for a winning candidate until I started voting based upon support for the medical research that will help my son's disease.



So I can't be classified as some type of right wing nutcase.  But Angeles in America was very mediocre.  I almost never watch TV, but on Sunday nights at 9:00 p.m., I make a margarita, dim the lights and fire up HBO.  I usually am rivited, due to both the tequila and the programming.



But during AIA, my mind kept wandering, bored.  I even started surfing the channels.  I stuck it out, but it became more than a totally cliched, dogmatic screed.



And I don't get your last comment - Why would a right wing critic not like it because it is too good?  That is absurd on its face.  They may dislike it because of the obnoxious villain-zation of the right, but not because it is too good.  Asethetics are not ideology.



Please don't get sloppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You liked it??!!</p>
<p>I am an ideological outsider, having never voted for a winning candidate until I started voting based upon support for the medical research that will help my son&#8217;s disease.</p>
<p>So I can&#8217;t be classified as some type of right wing nutcase.  But Angeles in America was very mediocre.  I almost never watch TV, but on Sunday nights at 9:00 p.m., I make a margarita, dim the lights and fire up HBO.  I usually am rivited, due to both the tequila and the programming.</p>
<p>But during AIA, my mind kept wandering, bored.  I even started surfing the channels.  I stuck it out, but it became more than a totally cliched, dogmatic screed.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t get your last comment - Why would a right wing critic not like it because it is too good?  That is absurd on its face.  They may dislike it because of the obnoxious villain-zation of the right, but not because it is too good.  Asethetics are not ideology.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t get sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
