
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That kind of Catholic.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=that-kind-of-catholic</link>
	<description>one writer&#039;s daily download</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116685</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116685</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase Justice Potter Stewart, &quot;It&#039;s not the teat but the tumidity.&quot; 

I stole that line from William Safire. I just googled it a second ago and see it&#039;s getting quite a lot of mileage without appropriate attribution. Speaking of doing the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase Justice Potter Stewart, &#8220;It&#8217;s not the teat but the tumidity.&#8221; </p>
<p>I stole that line from William Safire. I just googled it a second ago and see it&#8217;s getting quite a lot of mileage without appropriate attribution. Speaking of doing the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: del</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116648</link>
		<dc:creator>del</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116648</guid>
		<description>Oops. (poor google site-checking)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. (poor google site-checking)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116619</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116619</guid>
		<description>del-  fwiw --

It was Justice Potter Stewart who &quot;knew it when he saw it&quot;.

Great continuing thread here; I have so much I can say in response, but it will have to wait for the weekend when I am not at work; and I can be even MORE conspicuous in my &quot;verboseness&quot; than Pastor Jeff (!!!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>del-  fwiw &#8211;</p>
<p>It was Justice Potter Stewart who &#8220;knew it when he saw it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Great continuing thread here; I have so much I can say in response, but it will have to wait for the weekend when I am not at work; and I can be even MORE conspicuous in my &#8220;verboseness&#8221; than Pastor Jeff (!!!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116589</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116589</guid>
		<description>twenty three hours ago Mary made a suggestion.  And my response (like the little lady in &quot;Poltergeist&quot;) 

ALLLLLLL are welcome!!!  ALLL are welcome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twenty three hours ago Mary made a suggestion.  And my response (like the little lady in &#8220;Poltergeist&#8221;) </p>
<p>ALLLLLLL are welcome!!!  ALLL are welcome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: del</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116581</link>
		<dc:creator>del</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116581</guid>
		<description>Dan,
Yeah, it&#039;s hard -- maybe impossible -- to declare the reasons for our actions.  Is it good to stay married to the same person your whole life despite some rough patches?  I dunno.  We&#039;re getting into the realm of the unknowable.  You seem concerned about a moral slippery slope.  I&#039;m not as uncomfortable as some with moral ambiguity, but yes, I too have my limits and reach a point at which I crave clarity (wimpy as I am).  To me it&#039;s like neatness.  Everyone likes a clean room, but some people are more tolerant of of messiness.  Everyone craves moral clarity, but some are more tolerant of ambiguity.  I think virtue transcends religion.  We all know goodness when we see it:  Muslim, Jew, Hindu, agnostic, Inuit, whatever.  It&#039;s kinda the converse of what Supreme Court Justice Brennan said about &quot;obscenity&quot; . . . Can&#039;t tell you what it is, but &quot;I&#039;ll know it when I see it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
Yeah, it&#8217;s hard &#8212; maybe impossible &#8212; to declare the reasons for our actions.  Is it good to stay married to the same person your whole life despite some rough patches?  I dunno.  We&#8217;re getting into the realm of the unknowable.  You seem concerned about a moral slippery slope.  I&#8217;m not as uncomfortable as some with moral ambiguity, but yes, I too have my limits and reach a point at which I crave clarity (wimpy as I am).  To me it&#8217;s like neatness.  Everyone likes a clean room, but some people are more tolerant of of messiness.  Everyone craves moral clarity, but some are more tolerant of ambiguity.  I think virtue transcends religion.  We all know goodness when we see it:  Muslim, Jew, Hindu, agnostic, Inuit, whatever.  It&#8217;s kinda the converse of what Supreme Court Justice Brennan said about &#8220;obscenity&#8221; . . . Can&#8217;t tell you what it is, but &#8220;I&#8217;ll know it when I see it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauli</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116565</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116565</guid>
		<description>LOL. Mark Shea had a piece on Dreher&#039;s naivete, but he deleted it -- not sure why.... I preserved it &lt;a href=&quot;http://contrapauli.blogspot.com/2007/09/mark-shea-on-being-appalled-versus.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Mark Shea had a piece on Dreher&#8217;s naivete, but he deleted it &#8212; not sure why&#8230;. I preserved it <a href="http://contrapauli.blogspot.com/2007/09/mark-shea-on-being-appalled-versus.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian stouder</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116550</link>
		<dc:creator>brian stouder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116550</guid>
		<description>Well, I still liked the Country Joe McDonald article, fwiw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I still liked the Country Joe McDonald article, fwiw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116545</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116545</guid>
		<description>Ah, Exhibit A.

See here!  A argument is more than just simple statements to the contrary.

&quot;No it isn&#039;t.&quot;

&quot;Yes it is.&quot;

{sigh}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Exhibit A.</p>
<p>See here!  A argument is more than just simple statements to the contrary.</p>
<p>&#8220;No it isn&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes it is.&#8221;</p>
<p>{sigh}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116527</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116527</guid>
		<description>Danny, I have less interest in debating this than I do in inserting needles in my eyes, but let&#039;s at least get this on the table: When you&#039;re talking about religion, &quot;reasoned positions&quot; don&#039;t really enter the argument. On either side. 

Ow, the needles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, I have less interest in debating this than I do in inserting needles in my eyes, but let&#8217;s at least get this on the table: When you&#8217;re talking about religion, &#8220;reasoned positions&#8221; don&#8217;t really enter the argument. On either side. </p>
<p>Ow, the needles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116523</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/09/19/that-kind-of-catholic/#comment-116523</guid>
		<description>Dan, just so you know, a good many of the people around here will vehemently disagree with you if you say anything good about Christianity.  It&#039;s a reflex action.  Kind of like visiting the &quot;Argument Clinic&quot; in Monty Python, except with even less reasoned positions to the contrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, just so you know, a good many of the people around here will vehemently disagree with you if you say anything good about Christianity.  It&#8217;s a reflex action.  Kind of like visiting the &#8220;Argument Clinic&#8221; in Monty Python, except with even less reasoned positions to the contrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

