<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film at 11, eventually.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/</link>
	<description>one writer's daily download</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-140214</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-140214</guid>
		<description>I was once talking with someone who posited that the Civil War wasn't about slavery, it was about states' rights. You are right, I said. But it was about the rights of states to do things like, oooh, HAVE SLAVES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was once talking with someone who posited that the Civil War wasn&#8217;t about slavery, it was about states&#8217; rights. You are right, I said. But it was about the rights of states to do things like, oooh, HAVE SLAVES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelj</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139895</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139895</guid>
		<description>If you (and I'm talking about Ron Paul) claim to be a Libertarian, how do you not tout your posiition on legalizing drugs? This guy mails me cardboard slick pamphets daily. They're as full of abuse of the English language as the are of non-English speakers, like illegals flaunt US law. They may flout the law, but, please, they don't flaunt the law. You flaunt that big diamond or your Bat Mitzvah spread. When the Lou Dobbs candidate can't speak English, and spends a fortune to flaunt in direct mail. how am I supposed to feel?

Actually, having been raised by intelligent people, and having been predisposed to loving language, I know how to feel. And loving musical satire as I do, Randy Newman has this one. 'Jesus what a jerk, you're tripping over your own self now'.

Every cReepub is a total asshole. Any one of the Democratic combatants is perfectly acceptable as a sane aternative. 

Sorry  Nancy. I konw this isn't political. When things get to blowing off the Constitutiom in the interest of Cheney's cash from Halliburton, things have gotten out of hand.

There's a pretty good question of good citizenship here.
Beyonce is Diana lite?

Reporters are standing up, for a change. The administration tried the same lies they used about Iraq. That's obvious. World War III, you asshole? We already heard that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you (and I&#8217;m talking about Ron Paul) claim to be a Libertarian, how do you not tout your posiition on legalizing drugs? This guy mails me cardboard slick pamphets daily. They&#8217;re as full of abuse of the English language as the are of non-English speakers, like illegals flaunt US law. They may flout the law, but, please, they don&#8217;t flaunt the law. You flaunt that big diamond or your Bat Mitzvah spread. When the Lou Dobbs candidate can&#8217;t speak English, and spends a fortune to flaunt in direct mail. how am I supposed to feel?</p>
<p>Actually, having been raised by intelligent people, and having been predisposed to loving language, I know how to feel. And loving musical satire as I do, Randy Newman has this one. &#8216;Jesus what a jerk, you&#8217;re tripping over your own self now&#8217;.</p>
<p>Every cReepub is a total asshole. Any one of the Democratic combatants is perfectly acceptable as a sane aternative. </p>
<p>Sorry  Nancy. I konw this isn&#8217;t political. When things get to blowing off the Constitutiom in the interest of Cheney&#8217;s cash from Halliburton, things have gotten out of hand.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a pretty good question of good citizenship here.<br />
Beyonce is Diana lite?</p>
<p>Reporters are standing up, for a change. The administration tried the same lies they used about Iraq. That&#8217;s obvious. World War III, you asshole? We already heard that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joodyb</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139642</link>
		<dc:creator>joodyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139642</guid>
		<description>excellent 411 on the Flip. i'm in luff! can't wait to see more more more test drives. 
it's all Beyonce's mom. check it. i bet she actually hurt the next day. she's got to get a stylist to whom she is not related. i will always love her, though. and it is the most amazing green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent 411 on the Flip. i&#8217;m in luff! can&#8217;t wait to see more more more test drives.<br />
it&#8217;s all Beyonce&#8217;s mom. check it. i bet she actually hurt the next day. she&#8217;s got to get a stylist to whom she is not related. i will always love her, though. and it is the most amazing green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139506</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139506</guid>
		<description>I think that Beyonce's dress is quite unfortunate; great color, though. 

Re: faves. I can't get through a day w/out Go Fug Yourself, Gawker or NNC. Roger Ebert and David Byrne both have sites I'd recommend. And, much to the chagrin of my HS daughter, her grades are live and online. So I spend waaaay too much time on that, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Beyonce&#8217;s dress is quite unfortunate; great color, though. </p>
<p>Re: faves. I can&#8217;t get through a day w/out Go Fug Yourself, Gawker or NNC. Roger Ebert and David Byrne both have sites I&#8217;d recommend. And, much to the chagrin of my HS daughter, her grades are live and online. So I spend waaaay too much time on that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139494</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139494</guid>
		<description>Mindy, wish I had sound on my computer here at work. I think they denied us speakers for the express purpose of preventing us from looking at YouTube. (Actually there's a pair of speakers on the desk of a woman who got canned recently but I'm hesitant to swipe them just yet.)

Brian, I've heard the it-wasn't-about-slavery arguments before, once from a college history professor, although his take was that it was really about the economics of it all, e.g., that the south produced goods without the cost of labor, built a railway system of a different track gauge than those in the north, traded independently with other nations without abiding by federal laws and so on. I'm not sure in what context that lady (if she can be called that) brought this up, but the secession of the southern states was inarguably about slavery. And the war was about preventing the secession of those states. 

When I hear stories like this I'm glad I work for attorneys. They may be all kinds of things but in general there's one thing they're not and that's capital S Stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mindy, wish I had sound on my computer here at work. I think they denied us speakers for the express purpose of preventing us from looking at YouTube. (Actually there&#8217;s a pair of speakers on the desk of a woman who got canned recently but I&#8217;m hesitant to swipe them just yet.)</p>
<p>Brian, I&#8217;ve heard the it-wasn&#8217;t-about-slavery arguments before, once from a college history professor, although his take was that it was really about the economics of it all, e.g., that the south produced goods without the cost of labor, built a railway system of a different track gauge than those in the north, traded independently with other nations without abiding by federal laws and so on. I&#8217;m not sure in what context that lady (if she can be called that) brought this up, but the secession of the southern states was inarguably about slavery. And the war was about preventing the secession of those states. </p>
<p>When I hear stories like this I&#8217;m glad I work for attorneys. They may be all kinds of things but in general there&#8217;s one thing they&#8217;re not and that&#8217;s capital S Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beb</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139491</link>
		<dc:creator>beb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139491</guid>
		<description>As an old SF fan I grew up hearing that Heinlein had proclaimed that "An armed society is a polite society."  This seemed like a truism until I realized that this only works if EVERYONE in that armed society was killing to murder EVERYONE who wasn't polite, anything less becomes a THUG society where the willing killers terrorizes everyone else. 

It's Kafkaesque that when an American buys a gun the government wants to destroy any records of that sale within days but if you buy an airplane ticket they want to keep that information on file forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an old SF fan I grew up hearing that Heinlein had proclaimed that &#8220;An armed society is a polite society.&#8221;  This seemed like a truism until I realized that this only works if EVERYONE in that armed society was killing to murder EVERYONE who wasn&#8217;t polite, anything less becomes a THUG society where the willing killers terrorizes everyone else. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s Kafkaesque that when an American buys a gun the government wants to destroy any records of that sale within days but if you buy an airplane ticket they want to keep that information on file forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindy</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139490</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139490</guid>
		<description>Same here, Alex.  I've been wondering about rockin' the llama's ass all week, even as the Ronettes continued to pass around the coffee and the PUMPkin pie.  (The jewelry jingle lasted only and hour or so.  Thing's are getting worse! Thing's are getting worse!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEMI8L4FVXU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here, Alex.  I&#8217;ve been wondering about rockin&#8217; the llama&#8217;s ass all week, even as the Ronettes continued to pass around the coffee and the PUMPkin pie.  (The jewelry jingle lasted only and hour or so.  Thing&#8217;s are getting worse! Thing&#8217;s are getting worse!)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEMI8L4FVXU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEMI8L4FVXU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian stouder</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139489</link>
		<dc:creator>brian stouder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139489</guid>
		<description>Regarding Beyoncé, you got that right!

As for links, englishgirl's pops up on several sites I visit (as does NN.c, for that matter), and I have several friends who work at the same university (which is a block away from where we live)...and she writes about Formula One every so often.

Over the years (being an old goat!), I've more or less gotten my fill of endless internet political debate.

But last night, over dinner out with one of my (many!) bosses, and his wife, and a big customer, a remark was made (by the bosses wife) that the American Civil War was NOT about slavery....! followed by a "right?" and helpful 'yes' nodding directed toward me.....and after thinking over that situation for about 1.1 seconds - I opted to say "Well - I USED to think that, too..."

Potential ‘flame wars’ in the Real World almost never get much beyond a buffered bump like that. (she pressed me only a little farther, and I offered that honorable people could be found on both sides - but that it would be hard to imagine how such a horrendous Constitutional breakdown could possibly have occurred &lt;i&gt;without&lt;/i&gt; slavery specifically in the mix...and then it was on to how delicious the food was!)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Beyoncé, you got that right!</p>
<p>As for links, englishgirl&#8217;s pops up on several sites I visit (as does NN.c, for that matter), and I have several friends who work at the same university (which is a block away from where we live)&#8230;and she writes about Formula One every so often.</p>
<p>Over the years (being an old goat!), I&#8217;ve more or less gotten my fill of endless internet political debate.</p>
<p>But last night, over dinner out with one of my (many!) bosses, and his wife, and a big customer, a remark was made (by the bosses wife) that the American Civil War was NOT about slavery&#8230;.! followed by a &#8220;right?&#8221; and helpful &#8216;yes&#8217; nodding directed toward me&#8230;..and after thinking over that situation for about 1.1 seconds - I opted to say &#8220;Well - I USED to think that, too&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Potential ‘flame wars’ in the Real World almost never get much beyond a buffered bump like that. (she pressed me only a little farther, and I offered that honorable people could be found on both sides - but that it would be hard to imagine how such a horrendous Constitutional breakdown could possibly have occurred <i>without</i> slavery specifically in the mix&#8230;and then it was on to how delicious the food was!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139487</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139487</guid>
		<description>I cannot think of a (straight) man alive who would (like Brian, that old goat) not want Beyoncé on his arm in that dress. Likewise, I can't think of a woman who would steal it from her closet, either. It just looks like more trouble than it's worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot think of a (straight) man alive who would (like Brian, that old goat) not want Beyoncé on his arm in that dress. Likewise, I can&#8217;t think of a woman who would steal it from her closet, either. It just looks like more trouble than it&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA mary</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139485</link>
		<dc:creator>LA mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/2007/12/07/film-at-11-eventually/#comment-139485</guid>
		<description>Beyonce' has got to be wearing two layers of Spanx under that dress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beyonce&#8217; has got to be wearing two layers of Spanx under that dress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
