
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hooray for Hollywood.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hooray-for-hollywood</link>
	<description>one writer&#039;s daily download</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian stouder</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307982</link>
		<dc:creator>brian stouder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307982</guid>
		<description>Ol&#039; Sting was just utilizing his Poetic License, there.

With all this talk about birthdays and such, and just to show how ancient I&#039;m becoming, back in 7th grade (or thereabouts) I recall the teacher bringing in a big glossy cigarette ad from the Sunday paper (and the youngs folks say &quot;but, cigarettes don&#039;t advertise in the paper!&quot;**) and conducting a lesson based on the (grammatically faulty) catch-phrase &quot;Winston tastes good, like a cigarette should&quot;

**I think one short-term stimulous package the government could grant the printed-newspaper industry would be to grant them the a waiver, so that they could accept advertising from the big tobacco companies. The money would begin arriving in armored trucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ol&#8217; Sting was just utilizing his Poetic License, there.</p>
<p>With all this talk about birthdays and such, and just to show how ancient I&#8217;m becoming, back in 7th grade (or thereabouts) I recall the teacher bringing in a big glossy cigarette ad from the Sunday paper (and the youngs folks say &#8220;but, cigarettes don&#8217;t advertise in the paper!&#8221;**) and conducting a lesson based on the (grammatically faulty) catch-phrase &#8220;Winston tastes good, like a cigarette should&#8221;</p>
<p>**I think one short-term stimulous package the government could grant the printed-newspaper industry would be to grant them the a waiver, so that they could accept advertising from the big tobacco companies. The money would begin arriving in armored trucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff (the mild-mannered one)</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307975</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff (the mild-mannered one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307975</guid>
		<description>It sounds as if Nancy is hoping for bearer bonds for her birthday. They are easy to wrap, i&#039;d think - or just use one of those grandma cards with a window for the president&#039;s engraved face?  (And how do those work now with the offset, oversized Jacksons and Lincolns?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds as if Nancy is hoping for bearer bonds for her birthday. They are easy to wrap, i&#8217;d think &#8211; or just use one of those grandma cards with a window for the president&#8217;s engraved face?  (And how do those work now with the offset, oversized Jacksons and Lincolns?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307971</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307971</guid>
		<description>Must be a Brit thing, the collective noun. &quot;If you love somebody set them free.&quot; —&lt;i&gt;Sting&lt;/i&gt;  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must be a Brit thing, the collective noun. &#8220;If you love somebody set them free.&#8221; —<i>Sting</i>  <img src='http://nancynall.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307918</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307918</guid>
		<description>John Wooden and John Wooden Legs?  Unforgettable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Wooden and John Wooden Legs?  Unforgettable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jolene</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307914</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I sup­pose it’s my aca­d­e­mic back­ground, but I’m used to think­ing of “depart­ment” as a col­lec­tive noun for a group of peo­ple, and thus would find “their” to be per­fectly acceptable.&lt;/i&gt;

But in American English, collective nouns are generally treated as singular--in formal prose, if not in everyday speech.  Example:  &lt;i&gt;The family next door is from China&lt;/i&gt;.  Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/collectivenoun.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a one-page lesson&lt;/a&gt; on what to do when re collective nouns.

In British English, collective nouns are generally treated as plural.  Example: &lt;i&gt;The government have issued a new policy&lt;/i&gt;.  Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/collective%20noun&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a one-paragraph usage note&lt;/a&gt; that sums it all up nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I sup­pose it’s my aca­d­e­mic back­ground, but I’m used to think­ing of “depart­ment” as a col­lec­tive noun for a group of peo­ple, and thus would find “their” to be per­fectly acceptable.</i></p>
<p>But in American English, collective nouns are generally treated as singular&#8211;in formal prose, if not in everyday speech.  Example:  <i>The family next door is from China</i>.  Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/collectivenoun.htm" rel="nofollow">a one-page lesson</a> on what to do when re collective nouns.</p>
<p>In British English, collective nouns are generally treated as plural.  Example: <i>The government have issued a new policy</i>.  Here&#8217;s <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/collective%20noun" rel="nofollow">a one-paragraph usage note</a> that sums it all up nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307912</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307912</guid>
		<description>We who have cable TV will be treated to an alternative Christmas marathon movie, repeated showings of &quot;Dirty Dancing&quot;, all day long.  Why. TV Guide channel? Why?
http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/22/the-perfect-christmas-movie-marathon-dirty-dancing/

Hope you had a perfect day, Moe, on your birthday.  Many more.

Heidi Klum was on with Kimmel.  I have only seen his show a few times for a few minutes, but tonight it was time to pause and watch a little bit.  She just had her fourth child six weeks ago and she attributes her good conditioning to constant exercise from chasing kids around.  Her plan is working.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We who have cable TV will be treated to an alternative Christmas marathon movie, repeated showings of &#8220;Dirty Dancing&#8221;, all day long.  Why. TV Guide channel? Why?<br />
<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/22/the-perfect-christmas-movie-marathon-dirty-dancing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/22/the-perfect-christmas-movie-marathon-dirty-dancing/</a></p>
<p>Hope you had a perfect day, Moe, on your birthday.  Many more.</p>
<p>Heidi Klum was on with Kimmel.  I have only seen his show a few times for a few minutes, but tonight it was time to pause and watch a little bit.  She just had her fourth child six weeks ago and she attributes her good conditioning to constant exercise from chasing kids around.  Her plan is working.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rana</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307911</link>
		<dc:creator>Rana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307911</guid>
		<description>Happy Birthday moe!  And Denice!

I suppose it&#039;s my academic background, but I&#039;m used to thinking of &quot;department&quot; as a collective noun for a group of people, and thus would find &quot;their&quot; to be perfectly acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday moe!  And Denice!</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s my academic background, but I&#8217;m used to thinking of &#8220;department&#8221; as a collective noun for a group of people, and thus would find &#8220;their&#8221; to be perfectly acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denice B.</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307909</link>
		<dc:creator>Denice B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307909</guid>
		<description>Happy Birthday, Moe! It happens to be mine today too. Woo-Hoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday, Moe! It happens to be mine today too. Woo-Hoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Fields</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307900</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307900</guid>
		<description>Under the Movie Connections page for Sneakers, imdb.com says that idea was taken from Blindfold.  Which doesn&#039;t credit Gregory Peck.  But at least the date (1965) looks closer....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the Movie Connections page for Sneakers, imdb.com says that idea was taken from Blindfold.  Which doesn&#8217;t credit Gregory Peck.  But at least the date (1965) looks closer&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://nancynall.com/2009/11/23/hooray-for-hollywood/#comment-307884</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancynall.com/?p=4932#comment-307884</guid>
		<description>Dorthy,

Yes that was in the movie Sneakers, but when I saw that Sneakers I felt like I had seen something like that somewhere before, and it was geese the first time. It was a long time ago, I may have been in high school (in the 60s), and I thought it may have been a Hitchcock movie? For some reason I keep picturing Gregory Peck as the one who was kidnapped and blindfolded. But I must be misremembering again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dorthy,</p>
<p>Yes that was in the movie Sneakers, but when I saw that Sneakers I felt like I had seen something like that somewhere before, and it was geese the first time. It was a long time ago, I may have been in high school (in the 60s), and I thought it may have been a Hitchcock movie? For some reason I keep picturing Gregory Peck as the one who was kidnapped and blindfolded. But I must be misremembering again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

