nancynall.com » Heel of the loaf.

Heel of the loaf.

Stems and seeds today — but for a good rea­son. Lance and I have been asked to con­tribute to The Amer­i­can Street, and I spent much of today think­ing about what we should write about. I want to do a point-counterpoint chit-chat post along the lines of Slate’s Break­fast Table (do they even still do that?), some­thing that would cap­ture the sparkling nature of our reg­u­lar e-mail exchanges, because we’re so witty and smart ‘n’ stuff.

I sent Lance one draft of an open­ing vol­ley, and an sug­ges­tion for next week, and he wrote back: “I’m sick. I think we got some bad stromboli.”

Well, OK. Some­times you just can’t sparkle.

I think the Lance ‘n’ Nance pairup starts Sun­day. When it’s up, I’ll link.

Also, I’m read­ing a new Fred Busch book, “North,” and I’d like to get back to it. I agreed to take Kate to the pool today pre­cisely for the hour or so of read­ing time it offered. I’ve only been three times, but already I love the Grosse Pointe Woods pool and some­day soon I’ll tell you why. But not yet.

For­tu­nately, bloggage:

Well, now we know why Evan Bayh has a Flickr account. He’s water­ing the ground for a 2008 pres­i­den­tial run. I hope he does bet­ter than poor Dick Lugar.

One of the most inter­est­ing things about tech­nol­ogy is how reg­u­lar folks adapt it to their own ends. The ChiTrib tells us how GoogleMaps is spawn­ing its own cot­tage indus­tries. (Although I couldn’t get hous​ingmaps​.com to load.)

You all have a good weekend.

15 responses to
“Heel of the loaf.”

  1. blue girl said on June 10th, 2005 at 9:36 am

    Good luck with “Lance & Nance.” That’s really great.

  2. juan said on June 10th, 2005 at 11:13 am

    A point-counterpoint between you and LANCE?

    ???

    Isn’t that kind of like a point-counterpoint debate between Rush Limabaugh and Sean Hannity?

    I can see it now.

    “Bush Sucks”

    “No! Bush REALLY Sucks.”

    “I dis­agree. I say that he sucks, but doesn’t suck donkeys.”

    “Lance, you igno­rant slut, Bush CLEARLY inhales equine phallus.”

    “Okay, I con­ceed the equine part, but I was think­ing of some­thing less mutated. Some­thing like a Shet­land pony.”

  3. MarkH said on June 10th, 2005 at 11:26 am

    Juan and I obvi­ously asked our­selves the same ques­tion re: “Lance ‘n’ Nance”. But if I did have an answer, it cer­tainly wouldn’t have been as enter­tain­ing as HIS!

    LOL

  4. harry near indy said on June 10th, 2005 at 11:33 am

    poor dick lugar?

    nancy, please!

    he’s one of those go-along-to-get-alone mod­er­ate repub­li­cans who’ve been steam­rolled by the wingnuts. he deserves no sympathy.

    and evan bayh? i don’t think that man’s ever done any­thing spon­ta­neously in his life. if he got a cold, even his sneezes would be calculated.

    but, with that said, i’d rather see them rep­re­sent­ing indi­ana in the sen­ate than, say … oh, souder, the rep­re­sen­ta­tive from your for­mer part of the state.

    and hostet­tler, the one from sw indi­ana, and mike pence, too.

    if lugar runs for the sen­ate again next year, he would’ve served 36 years. i don’t know if he’s run­ning again, but i bet the pow­ers that be in the indi­ana gop orga­ni­za­tion will try like hell not to get an overly reli­gious wingnut nominated.

  5. Nance said on June 10th, 2005 at 12:43 pm

    Point-otherpoint, then. Jeez. Shut UP.

    My “poor Dick Lugar” com­ment was based entirely on an NPR piece I heard back when he was run­ning for pres­i­dent. It was from New Hamp­shire, and there was an inter­view with some­one say­ing, “Research shows the Amer­i­can peo­ple want a dig­ni­fied pres­i­dent with wide foreign-policy expe­ri­ence, this, that and the other thing, etc.” So there’s Dick Lugar, who by any mea­sure fits the descrip­tion to a T. And he couldn’t strike a spark in a match fac­tory. Just goes to show you what research is worth.

  6. mary said on June 10th, 2005 at 12:51 pm

    Juan

    Did you look at The Amer­i­can Street? It appears to be a web­site with a point of view very dif­fer­ent from your own. I don’t think the inten­tion of hav­ing Lance and Nance dis­cussing things is to have one of them rep­re­sent­ing the right. It looks to me like the site dis­cusses issues, not ide­ol­ogy. You may be unfamililar with the con­cept of dif­fer­ing ideas exist­ing among those with a shared polit­i­cal bent. It is tol­er­ated out­side of the right wing, however.

  7. Bushwick Bill said on June 10th, 2005 at 2:12 pm

    Mary said, “You may be unfamililar with the con­cept of dif­fer­ing ideas exist­ing among those with a shared polit­i­cal bent. It is tol­er­ated out­side of the right wing, however.”

    Yeah, sure, get back to me when the Demo­c­ra­tic Party nom­i­nates for pres­i­dent a pro-lifer…

  8. mary said on June 10th, 2005 at 4:59 pm

    Bill

    There are pro life Democ­rats, and they hold office. It’s been sug­gested many times that the rea­son Democ­rats haven’t been suc­cess­ful lately is the fact they do tol­er­ate debate. This is seen as a sign of weak­ness these days. The Dems don’t have any­one nick­named “The Hammer.”

    Mary­beth

  9. Laura said on June 10th, 2005 at 11:31 pm

    Stems and seeds, eh? Wow, I’m hav­ing a 70s moment. Thanks for tak­ing me back.

  10. Lance Mannion said on June 10th, 2005 at 11:55 pm

    That’s very true, Mary, but you know what else? Bush is a moron. A sev­en­ties moment, Laura? You know who was really stu­pid in the 70s? Bush. Harry, Dick Lugar is a smart guy. Not like that George Bush, eh? Blue Girl, thanks a lot. You know who’s too stu­pid to wish us luck? George Bush. Any­body seen Nance? I need to ask her a ques­tion. I won­der if she thinks George Bush is as dumb as I think he is.

    Got to go write my piece for the Amer­i­can Street now. I’m hav­ing trou­ble with it. I can’t think of any more ways to say Bush is an idiot. I’d bet­ter get out my thesaurus.

  11. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2005 at 12:27 am

    “It looks to me like the site dis­cusses issues, not ideology.”

    haha­ha­ha­ha­haha!! That sounds like “I’ll respect you in the morn­ing” or “the check is in the mail” or “that dog don’t bite”!

    “You know who’s too stu­pid to wish us luck? George Bush. Any­body seen Nance? I need to ask her a ques­tion. I won­der if she thinks George Bush is as dumb as I think he is.”

    See, and the inside joke is — we learned this week that W had slightly bet­ter grades than Kerry had at Yale (Kerry said “I told my father that “D” meant ‘dig­ni­fied’”!! hahahahahahaha!!!)

    Seri­ously, it (the blog) sounds inter­est­ing. Lance needs an edi­tor, and Nace prob­a­bly scored a big scar­lett “A” in that

  12. mary said on June 13th, 2005 at 11:35 am

    Lance

    I used to work for a jour­nal­ist who was the bureau chief and sole reporter at a back­wa­ter out­post of a very major news­pa­per. She had a list of folksy phrases one could sub­sti­tute for moron. Allegedly she knows Bush, sort of sec­ond hand­edly, from high school, and she doesn’t think he’s a moron. She doesn’t think much of him, but she says he’s not stu­pid. A jerk, yes, but not stupid.

  13. Lance Mannion said on June 13th, 2005 at 11:40 am

    Thanks for that, Mary. I’ll have to keep that in mind when­ever I give way to any more knee jerk Bush Bashing.

  14. mary said on June 13th, 2005 at 4:58 pm

    lance

    In case you do feel the need to call him a moron, here are a few of the folksy phrases:

    Dumber than a box of rocks.

    Square root of stupid.

    So stu­pid he couldn’t empty water from his boot if the instruc­tions were printed on the heel.

  15. Lance Mannion said on June 13th, 2005 at 7:05 pm

    Wait a minute, Mary, I thought we were talk­ing about George Bush. You’re describ­ing me!