nancynall.com » The Selectric years.

The Selectric years.

Per­haps because the indus­try is in such a pro­found slump, I find myself a sucker for news­pa­per nos­tal­gia — not the “Dead­line USA” arti­facts of glue pots and fedo­ras, but the era I was only able to glimpse the tail end of in my ear­li­est days in the biz, that is, the one por­trayed in “Zodiac,” a mur­der mys­tery in which the San Fran­cisco Chron­i­cle plays a major role.

I’m not a fan of David Fincher — hated “Fight Club,” sorry kids, and thought “Seven” was just tire­some — but with “Zodiac,” I’m soft­en­ing. It pre­sented a pic­ture of crime I rec­og­nize from my news­pa­per days, and one that stands in oppo­si­tion to “Seven.” Ser­ial killers tend not to be mad geniuses recre­at­ing crime scenes based on Renais­sance paint­ings of the sac­ri­fice of Isaac, say, but just nasty ass­holes with guns. Crimes are solved, when they are, based on either dumb mis­takes made by killers (who tend to be pretty dumb them­selves) or lots of not-particularly-cinematic leg­work by police. Fre­quently they’re not solved at all, tech­ni­cally; cases remain open even though cops tell you con­fi­den­tially that they know who did it, they just don’t have enough evi­dence to con­vict. That’s the case of the Zodiac killer, where the cir­cum­stan­tial evi­dence pointed over­whelm­ingly to one man, although (we learn in an ending-title sequence) later DNA evi­dence was incon­clu­sive. That’s how much real crime is — incon­clu­sive, but not.

Like “Mad Men,” “Zodiac” is a painstak­ing period piece, and it’s pos­si­ble to get lost in the scrupu­lous­ness of its detail — hey, I remem­ber those two-tone mail­boxes! Blue IBM selectrics! Cor­vairs! — and for­get what’s going on. But that’s just as well, because what’s going on is a more true-to-life police pro­ce­dural than most, in the sense that we see not cutting-edge foren­sics or amazing-coincidence inves­ti­ga­tions, but turf bat­tles, bureau­cratic med­dling, repor­to­r­ial screwups, tough breaks — the usual. A review I read at the time said it “feels long and is meant to feel long.” Titles flash by every cou­ple of min­utes: “Two and a half weeks later,” “Four months later,” “Four years later.” The case, like the movie, drags on. Six­ties set design gives way to sev­en­ties, and then to ’80s. (The main char­ac­ter, as if to under­line his obsession-to-the-point-of-lunacy, con­tin­ues to drive an orange Rab­bit through most of these years.)

As this is a true story, I’m not spoil­ing it to say the con­clu­sion is ambigu­ous. The star reporter gives in to ego­ma­nia, then dies of emphy­sema. (Yes, the smoke-filled news­room is like a char­ac­ter in and of itself.) The car­toon­ist loses his job, appar­ently because of his obses­sion with the Zodiac case, but we know he would have been dead meat long before this — car­toon­ists? Like the bud­get has money for that. But the scene that really got me was one where Jake Gyl­len­haal, play­ing the straight-arrow car­toon­ist, passes by the bar where Robert Downey, the wastrel reporter, is wash­ing off the day with 80 proof whiskey, along with what looks like half the staff, and they are hav­ing a high old time. That’s what I want to remem­ber about news­pa­pers. Not the booze, which took down its share of good peo­ple and bad, but the fun. The table in the nearby bar, with the sto­ries you couldn’t get in the paper.

Jon Car­roll remem­bers:

And the movie ver­sion of the Chron­i­cle city room was nowhere near as grungy and dis­or­derly as the actual city room. There must have been pho­tographs of the 1969 ver­sion around; maybe the moviemak­ers thought the real thing would be too dis­tract­ing. (“The truth? You can’t han­dle the truth.”) The place was awash in paper. The desks were stained and dented. The pil­lars, shown in the movie as pris­tine, were cov­ered with old front pages, amus­ing memos, girlie pic­tures — was it a hos­tile envi­ron­ment for women? You bet, but then, so was every­where else.

The movie shows a lit­tle drug use on the premises, which is accu­rate, more than accu­rate. There was one reporter who made more or less a full-time liv­ing deal­ing dope. And there was a lot of on-the-job drink­ing, some of it, like wine-soaked birth­day cel­e­bra­tions, entirely sanc­tioned. And a bar called Hanno’s was vir­tu­ally an exten­sion of The Chron­i­cle — its tele­phone num­ber was even printed in the interof­fice direc­tory.

The 1969 Chron­i­cle was closer, in both time and ambi­ence, to the Ben Hecht-”His Girl Fri­day” city rooms of the late ’30s than to the heav­ily cubi­cled, almost-tidy room of today.

Sigh.

Blog­gage:

Dog­fight­ing in Detroit. Every­thing you prob­a­bly didn’t want to know. The accom­pa­ny­ing video is excel­lent, more proof that some­times print peo­ple do TV bet­ter than TV peo­ple. Usage note: The story at that link con­tains the phrase “gnashes its teeth” in the lead. May I see the hands of those who know pre­cisely what teeth-gnashing is, and think that is, indeed, what the dog was doing? Thought so. My dic­tio­nary says, “to grind one’s teeth together, typ­i­cally in a sign of anger.” Just a nit­pick. What-evuh.

Another usage note: Who can tell me what “angst” means? It’s a Ger­man word for…? Any­one? Yes, anx­i­ety. That is, fear. Nowa­days it’s a catch-all term for any­thing that means “not happy.” I’ve given up on this one.

Back later. Have at it.

17 responses to
“The Selectric years.”

  1. Jeff said on September 20th, 2007 at 9:39 am

    . . . and peb­bled black AP tele­types that actu­ally did go “ding” every so often; i’ll never for­get as a young stringer being in the news­room when Pope Paul VI died, and the tele­type went “ding,” and no one noticed, “ding” and a few looked up, and then a third “ding” when even the ad lay­out guy looked up from his light table.

    They told me at the bar later that some of them had heard four “dings,” in Novem­ber of 1963.

  2. Kirk said on September 20th, 2007 at 9:42 am

    Long live the Gal­le­ria Tav­ern, where, on Fri­day evening, we’d keep push­ing tables together to accom­mo­date the news­pa­per crowd. Some weeks it was just two or three of us; oth­ers, there were more than 20 (that was guar­an­teed when the base­ball writer, cel­e­brat­ing the end of the sea­son, bought the first $100 worth of beer — and that was when $100 would buy a lot of beer). There were free appe­tiz­ers (plenty of rumaki for me, because most peo­ple wouldn’t touch chicken liv­ers) and a bosomy wait­ress named Holly, who brought us a bill when­ever it reached $50, so that those of us who stayed to the end wouldn’t get hosed by some of our cheaper col­leagues.

  3. LA mary said on September 20th, 2007 at 10:12 am

    When a Ger­man friend of mine sur­prised every­one by mar­ry­ing some­one she knew for only a short time, she said she had turschlus­sangst. Fear of the clos­ing door.

  4. Jeff said on September 20th, 2007 at 10:26 am

    I’ll have two turschlus­sangst, with sauer­kraut and brown mus­tard.

    Oh, and a Rhine white, cof­fee after.

  5. brian stouder said on September 20th, 2007 at 10:46 am

    Fresh-brewed schaden­freude

  6. nancy said on September 20th, 2007 at 10:47 am

    I think AP referred to their tele­type alerts as “bells.” And five was the most you could get, for a bul­letin (or was it a “flash?”). JFK’s assas­si­na­tion was a five-bell bul­letin for sure.

    The prob­lem was, they gave three bells to pretty much every­thing, so before long, the ding­ing was just part of the back­ground noise. And there was a lot more of it then — not only type­writ­ers, but phones and yakkety-yakking, too. Nowa­days most news­rooms are like an insur­ance office most of the time, even though the lan­guage is still fairly salty. A source close to this reporter said a staffer at a large-circulation daily in the Amer­i­can mid­west recently yelled FUCK THIS GODDAMN PIECE OF SHIT at her com­puter just as a tour group was ambling by. Made him laugh. Me, too. The tour group got a lit­tle wide-eyed, but I’m sure it’s not some­thing they haven’t heard before. (Dou­ble neg­a­tive; C/C-; see me after class.)

  7. brian stouder said on September 20th, 2007 at 10:50 am

    The tour group got a lit­tle wide-eyed

    AND – they got a story they can share for the rest of their lives!

    Well worth the price of admis­sion, I say

  8. Julie Robinson said on September 20th, 2007 at 10:56 am

    Watch­ing the tele­type while vis­it­ing Dad at the radio sta­tion was a high­light of my child­hood. The way the type jumped up and down was end­lessly fas­ci­nat­ing. (“No, really, I did have toys, doc­tor.”) And I remem­ber the bells, which did seem to go off fre­quently. And the already-yellowing paper rolls cycling through.

    But what I really loved was watch­ing Dad edit news sto­ries. On a reel to reel player. For each edit he had to take the reels off, make the cut, and put the ends in a splicer with some clear tape over the top. For a one-armed man, he was poetry in motion. OMG, have I turned into Tim Goe­glein?

  9. brian stouder said on September 20th, 2007 at 11:06 am

    OMG, have I turned into Tim Goe­glein?

    No no no!!! -

    for THAT you have to shoe-horn in a semi-related quote from Bartletts…maybe a pithy say­ing from Van Gogh about hav­ing one ear, or some such

  10. Danny said on September 20th, 2007 at 11:17 am

    Any­one watch­ing “Mad Men” see the final scene last week with Betty Draper calmly wan­der­ing around her back lawn, smok­ing a cig­a­rette, plug­ging the dis­agree­able Truman-Capote-esque neighbor’s courier pigeons with a pump rifle? All the the while, “You are My Spe­cial Angel,” play­ing in the back­ground.

    Hilar­i­ous. Nos­tal­gic. Apro­pos of very lit­tle in this thread.

  11. Connie said on September 20th, 2007 at 11:53 am

    I love my com­puter, but I have a secret nos­tal­gia for the IBM selec­tric. How many type balls can I get?

    I worked for sev­eral years dur­ing and right after col­lege at the Michi­gan State book­store in the buyer’s office. We did most of our order­ing on a punch style tele­type and know­ing how to do it was con­sid­ered a highly paid spe­cialty.

    Unlike the now antique machine that I was respon­si­ble for: a 5×8 card for all cur­rent inven­tory titles and other titles required by pro­fes­sors, ranked on a series of 4 shelves. The bot­tom of the cards had a punched in author title code. I could search by the codes, and every card that matched the code was popped up by lit­tle wires. Then the right one went out to the floor for an inven­tory check and back to the buyer’s office. (I was also the per­son who decided which text­books we would buy back at 50%.)

  12. James Moehrke said on September 20th, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    Ah, news­room sto­ries, I’ve got a mil­lion of ‘em.

    My favorite is the one where we had a big birth­day party for one of the writ­ers, at the auto editor’s house. He was rent­ing in a retire­ment com­mu­nity here, you have to be 55 to get in, and no kids allowed, so the retired fire engine that brought the guest of honor raised a few neigh­bor­hood eye­brows.

    Later, after the drink­ing got seri­ous, the publisher’s son was teach­ing my wife how to play ‘quar­ters,’ with glasses of beer. About that time he looked up to see one of the cops who’d been called when we got too rau­cous. “Big blue uni­form, big sil­ver star,” is still a mantra for us old-timers, though there are only one or two who were there still actu­ally on the pay­roll.

    And the new fea­tures edi­tor, who had not yet offi­cially started her job, quit the next Mon­day, after attend­ing the party. We saw her sit­ting in her car across from the office, appar­ently wrestling with the notion of whether or not she wanted to work with peo­ple like us. We heard later that she’d joined the mil­i­tary instead. We were that kind of crowd, where boot camp was more attrac­tive.

    We don’t have par­ties like that any­more, pity.

  13. nancy said on September 20th, 2007 at 1:56 pm

    When I was in col­lege, the news­pa­per staff had a party at the editor’s apart­ment. She lived in a mod­er­ate (for Athens, Ohio) high-rise, six floors or so, with a bal­cony on every apart­ment. Her bal­cony was on the top floor, and over­looked the dump­sters, which on this par­tic­u­lar night had just been emp­tied. A cou­ple of the pho­tog­ra­phers started play­ing “bas­ket­ball” with objects thrown off the bal­cony, aimed at the dump­sters.

    The police were called when they sent a cou­ple of beer kegs down, which made the bas­ket but also a hell of a lot of noise.

    Years later in Fort Wayne, Alan and I were drafted to host a job can­di­date for a Friday-night party. This was when bud­get cuts meant we tried to make can­di­dates stay over a Sat­ur­day night, to save on air­fare. It was a potluck dinner/barbecue. The guest of honor was apply­ing for the fea­tures edi­tor job, and every­one who came would have been on her staff. We all sat around drink­ing and drink­ing and drink­ing, while she barely said a word. Alan burned the chicken. One of the interns occa­sion­ally brought the con­ver­sa­tion to a screech­ing halt with such bon mots as, “I just love the new Steve Miller album. Don’t you?”

    She, too, was never seen again. Can’t blame her, really.

  14. basset said on September 20th, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    the Cadil­lac Party Lounge in Cadil­lac, Michi­gan was our news­room annex – $3.50 all you can eat chicken, fish, or frog legs, depend­ing on what they felt like fry­ing on any given Fri­day night. throw a cloth over the shuf­fle­board table and lay the hot trays out, cou­ple of forty-cent beers and you’re all set.

    per­fect place to unwind after a long day with the CP-16 and the glue splicer.

  15. Deborah said on September 20th, 2007 at 8:23 pm

    I love this blog, and I love the com­ments too. No place else like it in my mind. Makes me laugh out loud.

    I’m not a jour­nal­ist by a long­shot. I’m a designer, I’ve worked for a few arch­tec­ture firms and have fond mem­o­ries of par­ties and get togeth­ers such as you all have men­tioned here. Brings back old mem­o­ries. I’m still in the pro­fes­sion but it doesn’t seem like peo­ple are hav­ing as much fun as we used to. What’s up with that? Just me get­ting old?

  16. MichaelG said on September 20th, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    I vis­ited Hanno’s once. Hanno’s in the Alley it was called. It was in 1969 not long after I got out of the Army. I was vis­it­ing a lot of bars in those days. One of my drink­ing bud­dies was a copy boy at the Chron. They still have copy boys? Hanno’s was a totally unmem­o­rable place as far as bars go. Stone aver­age. The dif­fer­ence was (as it usu­ally is) in the clien­tele. Nobody was nasty, but I wasn’t part of the group. I didn’t bother me, I under­stood bar dynam­ics.

    Now, since I’ve split up with my wife, I go to an old Sacto insti­tu­tion on two or three Fri­day nights a month. I’d for­got­ten how pleas­ant a nice bar can be. It’s such a rough place I took my preg­nant daugh­ter and grand­son there for lunch in July. They both loved it. And vice-versa. The bar­tender was shov­ing pic­tures of his 2 yr old in our faces. Phys­i­cally, the place is an ancient dump just like Hanno’s was. A bar’s char­ac­ter is in the peo­ple.

  17. Pop Fart - Today Top Blog Posts on Pop Culture - Powered by SocialRank said on October 9th, 2007 at 2:48 am

    [...] The Selec­tric years. [...]