nancynall.com » Have at it, you vultures.

Have at it, you vultures.

Go ahead, I can take it:

40 responses to
“Have at it, you vultures.”

  1. John said on March 22nd, 2008 at 8:55 am

    I like! Great look­ing actors and cute dog. Shot well too. Sub­mit to youTube?

  2. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on March 22nd, 2008 at 8:59 am

    Like the scream fad­ing into the phone tone.

    Where’s the last scene, when he gets home, opens the case, and finds a Sha­nia Twain cd?

    BTW, i’m not a troll, i’m the third billy-goat!
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​T​h​r​e​e​_​B​i​l​l​y​_​G​o​a​t​s​_Gruff
    OK, maybe the sec­ond goat. But not a troll.

  3. Dorothy said on March 22nd, 2008 at 9:22 am

    I knew Chelsea would be a dog when the guy leaned into the cam­era after the phone call and talked to Chelsea! But it was a fun movie all the same! Great job.

    My niece has a female pug named Syd­ney. I’m gonna have to send this link to her.

  4. whitebeard said on March 22nd, 2008 at 11:09 am

    What a great movie, that must have been a fun ven­ture. We gave our grand­son a video cam­era for his 11th birth­day. He began mak­ing movies about World War Two and I was the tough drill sergeant. He could have lit­er­ally used your scriptwrit­ing tal­ents.

  5. Suzi said on March 22nd, 2008 at 11:53 am

    Crud! My old iBook won’t play the video, but just a word about vul­tures. They have returned to Hink­ley, Ohio, so it truly is Spring, don’t let the fresh snow fool you.

  6. MichaelG said on March 22nd, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    Ter­rific lit­tle sketch! Amus­ing and well writ­ten. You owe your­self a vic­tory lap. Nice and tight with­out unnec­es­sary embell­ish­ment. Shots well com­posed — I liked the pris­oner exchange set up. Good real sound. I hate that Foley shit. It’s ruined count­less movies. I con­cur with John. ‘Tube it. More please.

  7. del said on March 22nd, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Best line in vid: “Any man would…”
    Jeff, in Michi­gan the term troll is reserved for UPers (prou­nounced “yoop­ers”) refer­ring to those of us who live “under the [Mack­i­naw] bridge.”

  8. MichaelG said on March 22nd, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    Great quote from Ken Levine’s won­der­ful blog:

    “I hate myself for laugh­ing but KLAC sport­stalk host Big Joe McDon­nell said this about the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce set­tle­ment: she made a lot of money for spread­ing her leg.”

    Made me laugh out loud!

  9. Danny said on March 22nd, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    Michael. Hilar­i­ous!

  10. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on March 22nd, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    del –

    50+ years, and long may she stand, high above all us trolls!

    http://​www​.mighty​mac​.org

    Live web­cam:
    http://​www​.mack​i​nacbridge​.org

    (I’m inside thaw­ing after herd­ing 300 kids around a delight­ful if insanely cold egg hunt, where this year the Bunny did not com­plain once about hav­ing to wear the cos­tume — now, it’s lo mein and “The Ten Com­mand­ments” for us tonight, with Anne Bax­ter utter­ing her immor­tal lines.)

  11. Jolene said on March 22nd, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    Not that there’s any com­par­i­son, but there are some other until-now-unsung artists whose work has, just today, been brought to the atten­tion of the pub­lic. Enjoy.

  12. basset said on March 22nd, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    >>she made a lot of money for spread­ing her leg.”

    yeah, and she hadda lean on all his prop­erty…

    badump-bump.

  13. michaelj said on March 22nd, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    Chelsea’s really smart and she’s fairly attrac­tive. Some dis­gust­ing bas­tard like Rush could make a joke while rub­bing him­self, but he couldn’t get laid unless about $5grand and some oxy­con­tin turned up in his size 52 tightie whitey u’trou. That might be so hor­ri­fy­ing ClarenceThonas might speak up, If he can still speak. All thse years,

    NANCY drama? Torn from the head­lines. No totally spec­tac­u­lar and lumi­nes­cent gor­geous ADA with per­fect cheek­bones announc­ing she’s gay and exits stage right. This would have been a stilted Angie Har­mon episode, I guess.

    (An aside: who was the best female ADA? I’d say it’s a no-brainer: Claire Kin­caid, who left the series by being killed by a DUI dri­ver while sav­ing Lennie Briscoe’s soul. It wasn’t Sur­vivor, but it was pretty dra­matic, and actu­ally intel­li­gent, and the char­ac­ter­i­za­tion so pop­u­lar with TV crit­ics that the writ­ers avoided char­ac­ter­i­za­tion should have been 86ed about then. Actu­ally, crit­i­cism of the entire Law and Order fran­chise by peo­ple that devote their lives to spout­ing about who Simon Cow­ell likes is depress­ing, lame, and dumb­ing down. But in the eter­nal inter­est of dumb­ing down, y’all aren’t abut to lis­ten to Rus­sell Mael, so we have John Mel­len­camp. So he turned down Ray­gun. BFD. The Boss had already done that and there was no com­par­i­son. ).

    Wait. Was it sup­posed to be The Wire? What The Wire tried to do more than any­thing was recre­ate Pem­ble­ton, Bayliss, Moses Gunn as the Araber, the Box, and the corpse of Adena Wat­son.

    Noth­ing on cable, maybe noth­ing in movies, ever got closer to pars­ing evil. I think The Wire is great. Moral ambi­gu­ity? Alright. How about moral cer­ti­tude? Saw and Order got that some­times. So did The Wire. The unsolved case of Adena Wat­son is the best thing, for act­ing and writ­ing, that’s ever been on TV.

    Mild-mannered Jeff. When I was a kid, liv­ing on the banks of the Tug River in Ken­tucky, there was a pretty lady that lived on a hill in a man­sion and she had an egg hunt every Easter. I’m not mak­ing this up. I found the prize bas­ket, includ­ing Eisen­hower sil­ver dol­lars in a decrepit out­build­ing.

    A month later, the shed was torn down and there was a nest of cop­per­heads. Shit, that would have put a damper. But why wasn’t I bit­ten? Cho­sen? Doubt that seri­ously. Pure luck? I doubt luck is ever pure.

    So I don’t think there are cho­sen ones. I’d like to have been. Muad Dhib, you know? Mean­time, I think John Donne pretty much got things right, and nobody’s in this alone.

    Some­times shit hap­pens. Some­times adults (or arely formed idiots) make them hap­pen. And they meant to get rich, or some­how aggran­dize and fal­sify their roles in his­tory. Or both. Well, I mean Cheney. Is there a con­ceiv­able excuse for the six defer­ment piece of shit that ques­tioned Kerry’s patri­o­tism over sev­eral decades?

    weSe

    wWhf

  14. sue said on March 22nd, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    I can hear the Oscar speech now: “…and Bas­sett, and Jolene, and Mild Man­nered Jeff, and – oh, who else? I’m so excited I can’t remem­ber all of you… and Con­nie, and Del, and Danny, and …”
    Very nice, Nancy.

  15. Kafkaz said on March 22nd, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    Nancy–I like it! Good tran­si­tions and use of music all the way through. And, of course, the squeak toy moment is won­der­ful. A lot goes into mak­ing even a brief film like this. I bet you bring a whole new angle to watch­ing pro­fes­sional ver­sions, now. (Even adver­tise­ments, annoy­ing as I find them, are won­ders of edit­ing.) Gives you a feel for the ins and outs of col­lab­o­ra­tion, too, huh?

    The most fun day in Hor­ror Film was always the day stu­dents screened their projects. Oh, gosh. Some clas­sics! (One group almost got arrested film­ing theirs in a local park. Their spe­cial effects were uncan­nily good given how rudi­men­tary the tools they had to work with were.) One student-made hor­ror film involved a gold fish in a blender. Still makes me laugh to think of it. The stu­dents were def­i­nitely on the edge of their seats for that one.

    The actors were really good, too! Looks like this was a blast to make.

  16. Dexter said on March 23rd, 2008 at 12:55 am

    I called my brother last night…he screamed “I have to go! Rip­tyde is into the Chi­nese!” Rippy is a pug , and they have had many pugs…they’ll love it.
    1) Great musi­cal score
    2) Great actors.
    3) SO MUCH bet­ter than the aver­age YouTube video.
    4) Well writ­ten , con­cise, just what you needed to be.

  17. nancy said on March 23rd, 2008 at 9:02 am

    Well, thanks to all of you.

    Here’s what was eye-opening about this expe­ri­ence for me:

    ** It under­lined a lot of what we were taught in Screen­writ­ing 410 (rewrite), most of which boiled down to — pare away. You’d think, in a four-page script, there wouldn’t be much to cut, but I did four rewrites, and each one got tighter. I dropped an estab­lish­ing shot of the house, one of Butch leav­ing the bed­room with the blan­ket trail­ing over his shoul­der, a cou­ple of oth­ers. Even with no money involved, on video, with a small cam­era, each setup was amaz­ingly com­pli­cated. We found our­selves ask­ing: Do we need this to tell the story? And most often, the answer was no.

    Which is only inter­est­ing to you folks if you’re a movie fan, and haven’t fig­ured out Roger Ebert’s Rule of the Seem­ingly Insignif­i­cant Closeup yet. Which is: There are no insignif­i­cant close­ups.

    ** Col­lab­o­ra­tion is magic. I wrote this with two whey-faced 20something slack­ers in mind, imag­in­ing a shal­low, silly cou­ple who would hold dogs and video games hostage — lots of irony and arch snark. Swifty and Teresa showed up at the audi­tion and played it like this was the Lind­bergh Baby, Part Two, and it was the miss­ing piece; of course, this is the story. We did have one guy audi­tion who played it like the 20something slacker pro­to­type, and he was won­der­ful. But no woman could match him, and the thought of cast­ing him with Teresa was ludi­crous; you never would have seen them as an ex-couple. So the teacher told him to keep his phone on, because her next class would write some­thing just for him.

    ** Happy acci­dents are your best friend. Two class­mates, Raphael and Thi­ago, found the music on a Cre­ative Com­mons web­site, and when I first heard it I thought it was a bit heavy-handed (ever the fan of under­play­ing, I wanted some­thing like a sin­gle cello note, very low). But when we laid the sec­ond piece over the scream, it rose to a crescendo with the push-in shot, and every­body laughed, so that set­tled that. And now I see the music, which is over-the-top but not by much, sells the story as a kid­nap­ping but has just a note of humor in it.

    ** Finally, it’s not a real pro­duc­tion until some­one says, “We’re los­ing light!” You never notice how fast the sun moves until you’re try­ing to match shots on a day when it’s 25 degrees, the bat­ter­ies are fail­ing, the sound keeps cut­ting out, and clue­less peo­ple keep dri­ving and walk­ing through your shot. Don’t get me started on air­planes.

    It’s imper­fect, but it’s ours.

  18. nancy said on March 23rd, 2008 at 9:23 am

    Oh, and by the way, this was the inspi­ra­tion. If only we’d had $100,000, we could have made one just like it.

  19. Harl Delos said on March 23rd, 2008 at 9:52 am

    Thanks, Nancy, for let­ting this be a learn­ing expe­ri­ence for us, as well as for you. A cou­ple of months ago, I would have thought your film was a fun project. These days, I’m impressed. I’ve found how how “fun” video pro­duc­tion can be!

    I thought it would be, yes, “fun” to do a series of “3 AM” com­mer­cials. In one of them, an answer­ing machine would respond, say­ing “Please leave a mes­sage, I’m out try­ing to find my hus­band. I sus­pect he’s in bed, but I don’t know whose.” In another one, a guy says, “Hello”, and you can hear a toi­let flush­ing in the back­ground. “No,” he says, “I was up, any­way.” And so forth. I had about a dozen dif­fer­ent “ads” in mind.

    But I wanted to start off using the first part of Hillary’s ad at the start of my joke ads. I finally fig­ured out how to cap­ture the orig­i­nal 3 AM ad off YouTube, and I was about ready to learn how to edit video, when a guy walked into my (“my” mean­ing “the one I shop at”, not “the one I own”) super­mar­ket in the nude, and started throw­ing chairs, refrig­er­a­tor cases, etc., all around. It even­tu­ally ended up mak­ing “Joe in the Morn­ing”, and CNN, and the “Today” show, but the story on the local NBC sta­tion was excep­tion­ally funny. I wanted to post it on my web­site.

    Did I men­tion that I live in Lan­caster, PA? The county is over­whelm­ingly Repub­li­can, but because of the large Amish pop­u­la­tion, the com­mu­nity is far more lib­eral about nudity and sex­u­al­ity than most places I’ve lived, so the local TV sta­tion felt free to “play” with this story, far more so than the national cov­er­age did.

    And I will men­tion that the scene was not sex­ual or sen­sual at all, the guy was just unclothed? (They said he was drunk. I think he was stoned on some­thing else as well, and he took off his clothes because he was hot. But the poor guy is known to have had psy­chi­atric prob­lems in the past.)

    Any­how, I always TiVO the 11 PM news, and watch it when I go to bed at 2 or 3 AM. Now, how do I get the video from TiVO to the puter? I finally fig­ured out how to trans­fer the TiVO record­ing to my Handy­cam.

    But I can’t trans­fer from the Handy­cam to my com­puter, because I bought a “sec­ond” that has no work­ing USB port. And my wife sys­tem­at­i­cally screws up any com­puter she lays her hands on, and when I tried to install the Sony dri­ver to her com­puter, it wouldn’t ini­tial­ize. And it’s get­ting to be time to refor­mat her com­puter, but I’m hold­ing off on that because I can’t find all the CDs from soft­ware she uses.

    So the “3 AM” ads will be untimely by the time I would get them com­pleted. I’m still work­ing on fig­ur­ing out video pro­duc­tion, though, because I want to be ready for the next project I come up with.

    It’s imper­fect, but it’s ours.

    This is no time to be mod­est, Nance.

    They spent $175 mil­lion film­ing Kevin Costner’s “Water World” and that was 13 years ago, when a dol­lar was still worth about 35c. These days, it costs half a bil­lion dol­lars to film a big flop!

    And you came up with some­thing enjoy­able, entirely with donated labor and bor­rowed equip­ment!

    I agree; you ought to upload it to YouTube.

  20. Danny said on March 23rd, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Nancy, I too thought it was very good and it looks like great fun.

    “Do we need to tell this story?” Yeah that is the ques­tion and along with the com­plex­ity and time con­straints, voila, you have some prob­lems on your hands that need fast and cre­ative solu­tions. Two favorite DVD pack­ages I own are “Lord of the Rings” and the “Alien” series. When I was sick a few weeks back, I checked out the making-of extras disc for the orig­i­nal Alien, directed by Rid­ley Scott (this is when he was young and green still). The tal­ent and effort required to pull this sort of stuff off is amaz­ing.

    Your air­plane com­ment got me to think­ing of Zeppelin’s record­ing of Black Coun­try Woman. In the begin­ning you hear the air­plane and someone’s indis­tigu­ish­able com­ment to which Robert Plant replies in sort of an exas­per­ated tone, “Not even.” I’ve always won­dered if they were hav­ing envi­ron­men­tal noise prob­lems with get­ting that track down and Robert and the boys were like, “screw it, let’s record this even with the stu­pid air­plane in the begin­ning.”

    Edit: One other thing. When you were writ­ing the script, did you toy with the idea of hav­ing Teresa’s char­ac­ter yell into the phone, “Give me back my pug!!!” You know, like Mel Gib­son.

  21. basset said on March 23rd, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    >>I can’t trans­fer from the Handy­cam to my com­puter, because I bought a “sec­ond” that has no work­ing USB port.

    get a Mac, export through the Firewire port. prob­lem solved.

  22. Harl Delos said on March 23rd, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    get a Mac, export through the Firewire port. prob­lem solved.

    Oh, sure. Why do you think I bought a manufacturer’s sec­ond in the first place? I’m too cheap to pay $200 for a new com­puter, but I’m going to get some­thing that costs $129 every year just to keep the oper­at­ing sys­tem updated?

  23. jcburns said on March 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    costs $129 every year just to keep the oper­at­ing sys­tem updated?
    Hah, good one!
    You could be run­ning your Mac with ver­sion 10.3 (from 2003!) and it would do video cap­ture and edit­ing just fine–and run the most cur­rent Safari and email with­out prob­lems.
    But yeah, sure, if you want Leop­ard fanci­ness…

  24. Harl Delos said on March 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    You could be run­ning your Mac with ver­sion 10.3 (from 2003!) and it would do video cap­ture and edit­ing just fine–and run the most cur­rent Safari and email with­out prob­lems.

    Which part of “keep the oper­at­ing sys­tem updated” do you fail to com­pre­hend? You need OS X 10.4.9 in order to run Final Cut Stu­dio. You need OS X 10.4.10 in order to run Final Cut Express. You need OS X 10.4.11 in order to run Aper­ture.

    Let’s see. Refor­mat­ting a hard drive is free. Replac­ing a moth­er­board is about $100. A new com­puter from wal​mart​.com is $200. A mac that can hold four 300GB dri­ves starts about $2700, and I’d also need to replace my color laser printer (beau­ti­ful print­ing) and b/w laser (very fast and less than 1c a page), a web-cam, and a dig­i­tiz­ing tablet, because none of them are Mac-compatible. My Dymo 330 is com­pat­i­ble, but it’d be use­less, because stamps​.com isn’t.

    Gee, I guess switch­ing to Mac is absolutely the right choice for some­one who admits to being a cheap­skate. Thanks for the sug­ges­tion.

  25. nancy said on March 23rd, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    And if you had a Mac, you’d have a free pro­gram called iMovie, which will do video edit­ing up to the very-advanced ama­teur level, and have no need of Final Cut or Aper­ture.

    More to the point, you’re miss­ing J.C.’s point. You don’t need to keep your OS updated to the minute to run the vast major­ity of pro­grams. I haven’t gone to Leop­ard yet, my sib­lings haven’t found their way to Tiger, and we all get along fine.

    If you like all your periph­er­als that much, well, that’s the rea­son not to switch. But not because the OS is some rav­en­ous beast, because it isn’t.

  26. Harl Delos said on March 24th, 2008 at 1:17 am

    More to the point, you’re miss­ing J.C.’s point. You don’t need to keep your OS updated to the minute to run the vast major­ity of pro­grams.

    And you’re miss­ing my point. If the cig­a­rette lighter wasn’t work­ing on your car, and you needed it to keep your cell­phone charged, you wouldn’t replace your VW with a new Maserati. Even if the car was free, you wouldn’t want a car that gets 8 miles per gal­lon.

    And even if the Mac were free, I wouldn’t want a com­puter that costs a for­tune every time I turn around. It costs more for Mac soft­ware because there’s very lit­tle choice. It costs more for Mac periph­er­als because there’s very lit­tle choice. And there are things you just can’t do on a Mac.

    Run­ning “the vast major­ity of pro­grams” is like hav­ing a tire that’s round, every­where except the bot­tom.

    For instance, if you want to mail a 2-pound book, you have sev­eral choices.

    Since it’s over 16 ounces, if you use stamps, you have to go to the post office across town, and stand in line to hand the par­cel to a USPS employee. That’ll take 2-3 hours. You can use Media Mail (which runs about $1.65) but it’ll cost 45c extra for Deliv­ery Con­fir­ma­tion.

    You can go to USPS​.com with Safari, and use their desk­top ship­ping, sav­ing you the trip across town; you can drop it in any mail­box. You get Deliv­ery Con­fir­ma­tion for free. How­ever, you can’t use Media Mail. You have a choice between Pri­or­ity Mail (about $6) and Express Mail (some­thing like $12-15).

    Or you can use Slip­stream Man­ager from Pitney-Bowes. You can ship by Media Mail, get free Deliv­ery Con­fir­ma­tion, and drop it in any nearby mail­box – except that you can’t do it on a Mac, even if you pay hun­dreds of dol­lars for VMware. It’s strictly Win­dows only.

    If you like all your periph­er­als that much, well, that’s the rea­son not to switch. But not because the OS is some rav­en­ous beast, because it isn’t.

    Well, this *is* a periph­er­als issue. I didn’t say the OS was bad, I said it was expen­sive to keep updated. Just as a Maserati isn’t a bad car, but even if you win one in a lot­tery, the cost of gas and insur­ance is a killer.

    So if the cig­a­rette lighter on your car didn’t work, and you wanted to charge your cell phone while you were dri­ving, wouldn’t it make more sense to replace the cig­a­rette lighter than to replace your VW with a Maserati?

    That’s what we’re talk­ing about. I can (and will) even­tu­ally find all the CDs I need so I can refor­mat my wife’s hard drive. That will be free (which is the kind of price I like.) Alter­na­tively, I could spend about $100 to replace the moth­er­board on my PC so that the USB and IEEE 1294 ports work, or I could sim­ply move the 4 hard dri­ves to a new Everex GPC, which is $200 at Wal­Mart.

    But while mov­ing to a Mac might be an inter­est­ing option for some­one who only surfs and emails, it’s not for some­one who depends on his PC to do the wide vari­ety of jobs I use mine for.

  27. Kafkaz said on March 24th, 2008 at 1:22 am

    The Spike Jonze ads sure do count as art. I hopped from the inspi­ra­tion link over to quite a few exam­ples of his ad work. Destruc­tion seems to be one of his best things, but I like the dream sequence ad for the sneak­ers even more. Cap­tures dream logic per­fectly.

  28. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on March 24th, 2008 at 7:04 am

    Harl . . . eat the pod . . . go ahead, it won’t hurt you . . . just eat the pod, Harl . . . we’re wait­ing for you . . . eat the pod . . . time to eat the pod . . . Harl, the pods are call­ing you . . . eat the pod.

    [Yes, i'm typ­ing this on a Mac­Book. Lovely Wife's dis­ser­ta­tion on a Mac LC in 92 was our first bite of the Apple, which device still works*, as does the printer it came with; my father-in-law uses it to print the cal­en­dar pages he likes, even though he bought an iMac G5 last year. We've all eaten the pod, and we're so happy . . . so very happy. Just eat the pod, Harl, you can be happy, too.]

    [*A semi-serious obser­va­tion, while con­ced­ing the Mac-itude is a bit much from we who are the Elect -- in var­i­ous contract/free-lance gigs i've been given to work with three lap­tops of var­i­ous PC brands, and they've all died of short/wiring/major fail­ure causes (HP, Dell, Gate­way). The LC of 92 vin­tage is still work­ing, the tan­ger­ine clamshell iBook my wife wan­gled as part of her first job back in Ohio in '99 is now on our ten year old's desk, hav­ing only replaced the bat­tery on it, and my Mac­Book is sub­lime. Dura­bil­ity and com­pat­i­bil­ity over time makes Apple cost-effective as my home base choice, while i work with the prod­ucts of the Antichrist else­where with rel­a­tive equa­nim­ity.]

  29. basset said on March 24th, 2008 at 7:21 am

    Harl, I don’t give a shit what you use, and I don’t need to hear you going on once again about how absolutely right you are and every­one else can just shut up.

    I’m telling you what works for me; if you don’t want to lis­ten, that’s fine, but don’t pull an atti­tude (“what part… do you not com­pre­hend?”) over it.

    First thing I thought when I saw your post was “hmmm, won­der if he’s try­ing to use the Firewire port and thinks it’s the USB?”

    I have four Macs, includ­ing the LC in the attic, and a day job with a gov­ern­ment agency which uses only Dell PCs. The Dells are a con­stant source of trou­ble and aggra­va­tion (“Pro­gram is not respond­ing…”), the Macs… just work.

  30. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on March 24th, 2008 at 7:36 am

    See how pain­less it is? Eat the pod . . . the pods are good, they make you feel good . . . eat the pod, Harl.

  31. brian stouder said on March 24th, 2008 at 7:51 am

    loved the movie; it caught Chloe’s atten­tion, too, and stopped her in her tracks – so, in addi­tion to appeal­ing to us Friends of nn.c, we have inde­pen­dent con­fir­ma­tion that it has real hooks.

    Harl lost me at the bak­ery when it comes to OJ/inappropriate behav­ior in front of chil­dren, but I agree with him on Mac ver­sus Win­dows. I’m firmly in the Heaven’s Gates sect

  32. Connie said on March 24th, 2008 at 9:30 am

    Loved the movie, but Mitzi’s hair looked awfully nice for some­one who just got out of bed.

    In other news, I am more appalled every day at the things men are will­ing to say about women, most par­tic­u­larly Hillary and Heather Mills (see dis­gust­ing woman hat­ing com­ment about Mills above).

  33. nancy said on March 24th, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Spike Jonze’s shorts/commercials/music videos are so good, it almost makes me for­get he was the inspi­ra­tion for Gio­vanni Ribisi’s neglect­ful hus­band in “Lost in Trans­la­tion.” Of course, if my wife had been Sofia Coppola’s char­ac­ter in that movie, I’d have neglected her, too.

    The Gap ad is fab­u­lous. Never ran. It scared the com­pany, or so I’ve heard.

  34. jcburns

    jcburns said on March 24th, 2008 at 10:19 am

    The need to have the “lat­est and great­est” is a com­pelling one, and I’ve cer­tainly suc­cumbed to it, but with any prod­uct (Apple, Adobe) one oughta take a breath before plunk­ing down a credit card merely because it’s new. If you run Mac OS 10.3 (2003) you can run Final Cut Pro HD (the pre­de­ces­sor to Stu­dio) and Adobe After Effects 6.5 and Pho­to­shop 7 and frankly, there’s noth­ing you can’t do with that trio in terms of cre­at­ing television—DV to HD—that requires an upgrade. That’s all I was sayin’.
    Absolutely the newer stuff has nuances and work­flows that may be more effi­cient or faster (color cor­rec­tion, all the stuff that Aper­ture offers) but I’m hard-pressed to say any of that is must-have…and when you have older hard­ware, espe­cially stuff that doesn’t have fancy new graphics-card pro­cess­ing, the newer OS can be a pain to slog through…when on even a low-end new machine, it flies.
    Trade­offs.

  35. John said on March 24th, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Nancy,

    Now that you have had a day to bask in the glow of the acco­lades, can you address the light­ing issue at 33 sec­onds in? It appears the cam­era was left on auto-adjustment and opened up as Swifty entered the door. But the light from the fix­ture floods the frame. Did the film­ing crew have a dis­cus­sion about this or was it dis­cov­ered in post-production?

    Also, Swifty’s head was shin­ing pretty bright dur­ing the phone con­ver­sa­tion. Was there a dis­cus­sion about apply­ing more (or some) pan­cake makeup?

  36. nancy said on March 24th, 2008 at 10:58 am

    Well, we def­i­nitely talked about his shiny head. We decided to leave it alone because we thought it fit the scene — he was in a kitchen with an over­head light, and that’s the sort of thing over­head lights do. Even­tu­ally we thought it was a mis­take we could live with.

    As for the sneakin-through-the-doorway shot, that was a pain in the ass from the get-go — the cam­era oper­a­tor on his belly, the cam­era propped up with a stack of paper­backs, etc. No one men­tioned the aper­ture adjust­ment, so THANKS A LOT, JOHN, for giv­ing me another flaw to focus on. What I remem­ber about that was the light on his face, which was accom­plished with two hand-held flash­lights. I held one of them, and yet, I didn’t insist on a credit; there is no end to my gen­eros­ity.

  37. brian stouder said on March 24th, 2008 at 11:13 am

    I held one of them, and yet, I didn’t insist on a credit;

    I think that makes you a ‘gaffer’ or a ‘best boy’, or some such

  38. John said on March 24th, 2008 at 11:45 am

    Nancy,

    It is obvi­ous that your five minute film has 100s of man-hours invested in it. The pro­duc­tion qual­ity is appar­ent. I merely asked because I want to know what the film­mak­ers’ think­ing process is, espe­cially dur­ing the time crit­i­cal shoot­ing of a scene. Details like these make me appre­ci­ate truly mag­nif­i­cent films. I watched “The Third Man” yes­ter­day morn­ing (my Net­flix movie of the week) so I have been spoiled.

  39. nancy said on March 24th, 2008 at 11:51 am

    I know, dar­lin’. I’m just fun­nin’ ya.

  40. basset said on March 24th, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    that’s exactly what I was doing, JC… Final Cut Pro HD 4 on a 2004 G5 with 10.3.9, cut audio on Sound­track, fid­dle around with still pic­tures in Pho­to­shop Ele­ments (my needs are small there), every­thing worked fine and sta­ble.

    then I got that damn iPod for Christ­mas. requires 10.4 so I said what the hell, upgraded to Leop­ard and bought some more mem­ory while I was at it.

    gonna repar­ti­tion the drive Wed. night so it’ll still start up in 10.3.9 and I can have Pho­to­shop and Stu­dio Pro back. assum­ing I can find them, along with the orig­i­nal sys­tem disk, or cruise eBay for cheap out of date ver­sions.