nancynall.com » Miss? Another cocktail.

Miss? Another cocktail.

One of the things I like about my Russ­ian teacher is that she’s a bit older, retired after 30 years in the pub­lic schools, and unlike my UM grad-student TA, we share a com­mon ini­tial ref­er­ence point for Rus­sia — the old Soviet Union. She shares her library of Soviet-era books with me, and under­stands what I’m ask­ing when I won­der whether young Rus­sians ever call one another tovar­itch (com­rade), you know, iron­i­cally. Some things seem to have made the tran­si­tion from Com­mu­nist Rus­sia to oli­garchi­cal Rus­sia intact, how­ever. Take the national air­line, Aeroflot:

It is nor­mally a moment of cheery reas­sur­ance when an air­line pilot greets pas­sen­gers dur­ing prepa­ra­tions for take-off. But Alexan­der Chep­levsky sparked panic on flight Aeroflot 315 when he began to speak.

His slurred and gar­bled com­ments ahead of a flight from Moscow to New York con­vinced pas­sen­gers that he was drunk. When he appar­ently switched from Russ­ian into unin­tel­li­gi­ble Eng­lish, fear turned to revolt.

It gets bet­ter. After the air­line sent reps to calm the pas­sen­gers, they offered this com­fort­ing rationalization:

One sought to reas­sure them by announc­ing that it was “not such a big deal” if the pilot was drunk because the air­craft prac­ti­cally flew itself.

And then the pilot finally came out of the cock­pit to face his accusers:

Mr Chep­levsky did lit­tle to ease pas­sen­gers’ fears by refus­ing to leave the cock­pit to show that he was sober. When he was finally per­suaded to face them, wit­nesses said that he appeared unsteady on his feet and had blood­shot eyes.

“I don’t think there’s any­one in Rus­sia who doesn’t know what a drunk per­son looks like,” Katya Kush­ner, one of the pas­sen­gers, told the Moscow Times, which had a reporter trav­el­ling on the flight.

Well, they can’t all be Ches­ley Sul­len­berger, I guess. That last quote made me gig­gle — vodka is to Rus­sia what gin was to Vic­to­rian Eng­land, i.e., what crack cocaine was to late 20th-century urban Amer­ica. Remem­ber crack? Remem­ber crack babies? Amer­ica was birthing a gen­er­a­tion of mon­sters, we were told, a zombie-youth corps that would doom our already impov­er­ished cities to true night­mare sta­tus. I believed it. You prob­a­bly believed it. And guess what? It’s not true. While smok­ing crack dur­ing preg­nancy isn’t harm­less to infants, and while it’s true that babies can be born addicted to drugs, the life­long effects are about roughly equiv­a­lent to…well, let the NYT nut graf tell the tale:

Cocaine is undoubt­edly bad for the fetus. But experts say its effects are less severe than those of alco­hol and are com­pa­ra­ble to those of tobacco — two legal sub­stances that are used much more often by preg­nant women, despite health warnings.

All of this is lead­ing to some­thing you prob­a­bly already read — it’s got­ten a lot of cir­cu­la­tion in the last few days. I nor­mally hate “the speech he should have given” pieces, but Radley Balko’s thoughts on what Michael Phelps should have said about that bong pic­ture breaks the bounds of the genre by being actu­ally read­able and, um, true:

I take it back. I don’t apologize.

Because you know what? It’s none of your god­damned busi­ness. I work my ass off 10 months per year. It’s that hard work that gave you all those gooey feel­ings of patri­o­tism last sum­mer. If dur­ing my brief win­dow of down time I want to relax, enjoy myself, and par­take of a sub­stance that’s a hell of a lot less bad for me than alco­hol, tobacco, or, frankly, most of the pre­scrip­tion drugs most of you are tak­ing, well, you can spare me the lecture.

It goes on, and it’s worth read­ing. I gen­er­ally object to drugs on more prac­ti­cal grounds, i.e., does the world need more stu­pid peo­ple pinned to their couches, laugh­ing at “Jack­ass”? But it’s a free coun­try, and you don’t have to join them, and Balko’s argu­ment is sound. When it comes to drugs that really take a toll on soci­ety, it’s hard to top alco­hol. This isn’t an argu­ment for pro­hi­bi­tion. We already had it, and we lost, or rather we scram­bled to some sort of Gaza/partition deal, where alco­hol is OK but other drugs aren’t. So the swim­mer who earned 14 Olympic medals has to grovel and pre­tend what he was pho­tographed doing is pre­cisely the same as inject­ing a speed­ball into his arm. While some­where halfway around the world, the dark com­edy of Aeroflot and its drunken pilot unfolds as farce.

I don’t get it, either. But I appre­ci­ate it.

And so we come to the news I’ve been avoid­ing so far: Amy Wel­born, my ex-neighbor in Fort Wayne, lost her hus­band sud­denly yes­ter­day. Michael Dubruiel went for a run at the Y, col­lapsed and died of sud­den car­diac arrest. They had recently relo­cated to Alabama and were lov­ing their new home (even while their old one sits like a rock on the mori­bund Fort Wayne real-estate mar­ket). Besides Amy, he leaves behind two lit­tle boys and all the usual holes in many other lives. This is the third time in a year that some­one I’ve known has died and left lit­tle chil­dren with­out a par­ent. Worst year ever.

57 responses to
“Miss? Another cocktail.”

  1. jeff borden said on February 4th, 2009 at 10:59 am

    Con­do­lences to you on the death of your friend. We lost two great pals over the past cou­ple of years who were only in their mid-40s: one to a stroke that led to a brain anuerism that killed him and the other to a heart attack. Allan had remar­ried for a sec­ond time just two years ear­lier and left behind a 7-month-old daugh­ter. I cried as much at his funeral as I did at those of my mother (84) and father (86). They had led long, good lives and were ready for the next phase. Allan (who left the baby daugh­ter behind) had every­thing to live for and was only 45. I still mist over when I think about that lit­tle one never being able to remem­ber what it was like to be held by her dad.

    Re: Phelps. The drug poli­cies in this coun­try are insane. There are some 600,000 Amer­i­cans in prison for marijuana-related offenses. Are some of them bad folks who deserve to be there? As Sarah Palin would say, “You betcha.” But most are no threat to soci­ety. Yet we act like these guys are the embod­i­ment of the Pur­ple Gang. Dri­ving while stoned should get you the same treat­ment as dri­ving while drunk, but I’m at a loss as to under­stand how soci­ety is threat­ened if friends sit around pass­ing the pipe while watch­ing “Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle.”

    Then there’s the racially cock­eyed way we impose justice.

    A black teen on the West Side of Chicago gets caught with a cou­ple of rocks and he is head­ing for prison. A white teen in the north­ern sub­urbs gets caught with a gram of pow­der and he heads for coun­sel­ing and then a return to school. Why is smok­ing coke worse than snorting?

    And we haven’t even broached the REAL prob­lem — the increas­ing use of pre­scrip­tion drugs. Lots of kids are get­ting a buzz from the pills they find in Mom and Dad’s med­i­cine cabinet.

    Nancy, you alluded to Pro­hi­bi­tion. Most his­to­ri­ans and crim­i­nol­o­gists find the nation­wide roots of La Cosa Nos­tra in the rich pay­day that befell those mob­sters who cir­cum­vented the law with ille­gal hooch…a pur­suit so prof­itable it was worth killing rivals to pro­tect. We face a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion today, but the gang­sters are not so dis­cern­ing as those who worked for the Mafia, who tended to kill each other. Today, if there are five inno­cent chil­dren near your intended tar­get, well, that’s just col­lat­eral dam­age to your mod­ern gangbanger.

    It’s still polit­i­cal sui­cide to even broach the sub­ject of revis­it­ing drug laws. The iner­tia ben­e­fits no one but the gangs, who just get richer and more vio­lent by the year.

  2. Dorothy said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:01 am

    Oh my good­ness, how sad about Amy’s hus­band. Her fam­ily will be in my prayers. I had for­got­ten about the other lady you men­tioned in the link, but Ash­ley Mor­ris would be a third per­son to leave so sud­denly. What a world…

  3. LA Mary said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    There was Ash­ley as well. He had some lit­tle guys, didn’t he?

  4. nancy said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:08 am

    Yes, I for­got he was in the last 12 months, too. I’ll fix that.

    Hana Mor­ris is fur­thest down this road, and from her blogs of late, it doesn’t sound like she’s hav­ing an easy path.

  5. Gasman said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    Nancy,
    My deep­est sym­pa­thy and empa­thy. My wife’s cousin, 50 years old, died a cou­ple of weeks ago. He had a mas­sive heart attack in his sleep and never woke up. He had no symp­toms and no warn­ings. We are still a bit numb. The sober­ing real­ity is that increas­ingly we feel like sur­vivors as our rel­a­tives, friends, and con­tem­po­raries start falling around us. Let us honor their mem­o­ries and toast them fondly with hap­pier mem­o­ries and bev­er­ages of our choice.

    Bon voy­age, mes amis!

  6. Catherine said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    I will keep Amy and her boys in my prayers. I lost my mother when I was about their age. All I can say is, it sucks.

    What Jeff said about drug pol­icy, and what Nancy said about alco­hol being more toxic in the womb than cocaine or tobacco. If you’ve ever worked with a child with Fetal Alco­hol Syn­drome (I had one in a Sun­day school class), it’s just… such a shame. The odd thing is (accord­ing to my sis­ter the OB) that it’s dif­fi­cult to pre­dict which chil­dren are going to be born impaired. If you’re drink­ing while preg­nant, the odds of a FAS baby are some­thing like 1 in 4. The pla­cen­tal bar­rier really does work its magic in many cases. And in other cases, much less drink­ing still leads to FAS — hence the warn­ings about drink­ing while preg­nant — but hon­estly, is there any other legal, non-prescription, ubiq­ui­tous sub­stance that can cause such fetal damage?

  7. coozledad said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    I remem­ber read­ing a sim­i­lar story about a Russ­ian jour­nal­ist who was on a pas­sen­ger train head­ing not quite to Siberia. The engi­neer walked back to his car bear­ing a cou­ple of bot­tles of vodka and offered him a drink.
    “But who’s dri­ving the train?“
    “This leg is another eigh­teen hours, and besides, the damned thing’s on rails. Chill.”

  8. brian stouder said on February 4th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

    The funny thing about death is its (alto­gether coun­ter­in­tu­itive) power to astound us, at any time. The sur­prise never gets old.

    Aside from that, if an Olympic cham­pion WERE to lec­ture us that “dur­ing my brief win­dow of down time I want to relax, enjoy myself, and par­take of [an ille­gal] sub­stance… well, you can spare me the lecture.”

    I would take the deal and spare him the lecture.

    And I would ask that, in return, the rest of us bor­ing law-abiding folks should like­wise be spared the lec­ture (from ‘open-minded’ cul­tural scolds and the like) about how it’s just non­sen­si­cal and unfair that spon­sors aren’t bang­ing down his door to give him the mil­lions he thinks he would have got­ten, if his actual behav­ior matched his All Amer­i­can good fella image (other than, say, Zig Zag)

    Deal?

  9. Hoosier said on February 4th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    No Brian death does not always sur­prise one. Some­times one prays for the pain and suf­fer­ing of a loved one to end. And when it does, its a releif; a joy that the suf­fer­ing is over.

  10. Rana said on February 4th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Nancy, I’m sorry about your friend.

  11. Jeff Borden said on February 4th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Brian,

    No lec­tures from me. By the same token, I have zero prob­lem with a 23-year-old ath­lete act­ing like a typ­i­cal 23-year-old, par­tic­u­larly given the hell­ish train­ing sched­ule he endures for most of the year. Those who want to tar this excep­tional com­peti­tor because he smoked some dope and drank some beer –par­tic­u­larly those who do it as they sip a dou­ble Scotch or a mar­tini after work– prob­a­bly would be well-served to look back to their own youth­ful dis­cre­tions before they fit the kid for his prison stripes.

  12. whitebeard said on February 4th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    I lost my two broth­ers, years apart, but both were 58 years old, one a heavy smoker, sud­denly as he walked down­stairs to his car, and the other on dial­y­sis and every­thing else fail­ing, peace­fully in his sleep. It seems unfair that one’s younger broth­ers should die first; there was so much more to talk about.
    So my prayers go out to the widow and her young boys.

  13. Deborah said on February 4th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I’m in my late 50s. A cou­ple of weeks ago I had a close friend die, aged 64, and 2 acquain­tances died a bit before that, one was my age and the other a cou­ple of years older. So I guess this will con­tinue to hap­pen as I age. I don’t think I’ll get used to it.
    Regard­ing drugs, I totally agree that we have a sys­tem that’s totally bro­ken. I had a large bev­er­age com­pany as a client once, they make bour­bon and a bunch of other adult bev­er­ages. They spend a ton of money on lob­by­ing, I don’t think things are going to change eas­ily. Alcohol.Firearms.Tobacco.

  14. nancy said on February 4th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I didn’t want this to become a mourn­ing thread. While I like Amy and knew Michael a lit­tle, we’re not close and weren’t friends beyond read­ing one another’s blogs, cor­re­spond­ing about this and that, and them com­ing to a Christ­mas party at our house a few years back. (At which their son, who was then about two, took the baby Jesus out of the Nativ­ity scene and showed him to us. He dropped the fig­ure to the car­pet and the dog, who as usual was being dri­ven INSANE by our party guests with all their FOOD, lunged for B.J. and we nearly had an inci­dent. I think they were mor­ti­fied, being far, far more reli­gious than us. I thought it was just funny. Stu­pid dog. Ha ha ha.)

    Any­way, I think what’s hap­pen­ing to me/us this year is sim­ply that we’ve reached That Age, when the phone calls that come aren’t nec­es­sar­ily good news. I’m at the point where when I receive e-mail with the sub­ject line Big News, I no longer assume it’s about a great new job, a preg­nancy or other glad tid­ings. It’s just as likely to be about tumors, ill­ness and death. “The age of grief,” Jane Smi­ley called it in one of her books. That’s it.

    When these things hap­pen I inevitably pause to reflect on how bad oth­ers have it. There was a man in Fort Wayne who lost his brother at the World Trade Cen­ter, and both his chil­dren in a sin­gle car acci­dent a year or two later. None of us live in Iraq. Imag­ine being a woman in Dar­fur when the jan­jaweed blow into town. Most of us have pretty good lives, which we’ve worked hard to get, so we can sit around at our com­put­ers through the day chat­ting with strangers. Bad things hap­pen, but we’re mainly spared real catastrophe.

    My par­ents made a bunch of new friends in their 50s, and com­menced a social whirl of fun that sus­tained them until they reached assisted liv­ing. I think maybe that’s the answer to the age of grief. Keep pass­ing the open win­dows, you know?

  15. jeff borden said on February 4th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    I will change the sub­ject. Read­ers of NN.C. How immoral am I for want­ing Dick Cheney to keel over as soon as pos­si­ble? How rot­ten am I as a per­son for wish­ing this blight on Amer­ica would go off to what­ever eter­nal pun­ish­ment he so richly deserves sooner than later?

    In his lat­est pro­nounce­ments on how Pres­i­dent Obama is endan­ger­ing us by scrap­ping the law­less meth­ods of inter­ro­ga­tion favored by him and his fas­cist bud­dies Adding­ton, Libby, Yoo etal., you can dis­cern his fer­vent wish that more Amer­i­cans die in a ter­ror­ist attack so that the filthy work done by him and his pack of jack­als is justified.

    It’ll be good for Repub­li­can elec­toral prospects, too.

    Is there a politi­cian in mod­ern times more awe­somely mon­strous than this pseudo-patriotic, five-time draft defer­ring chick­en­hawk S.O.B.?

  16. Sue said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Ok, before this com­ment board explodes re Jeff Borden’s com­ment, I would just like to say that my hus­band and I have decided that we are going to send an email to com­pa­nies that drop their Michael Phelps endorse­ments. The emails will all begin with the fol­low­ing sen­tence: “Dude. That was haaaarsh…”

  17. beb said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Jeff B. — Not good enough of an effort to change the sub­ject, alas.

    I was read­ing the other day about some researchers who made biodiesel out of used cof­fee grounds. It seems that ever after being used to make cof­fee, the gorunds are still about 10 – 15% oil, which can be squeezed out and make into diesel fuel. It’s said to smell a bit like a cup of cof­fee. As opposed to the biodiesel made from used fryr fat that smells like french fries. So save your cof­fee grounds, folks, they may be worth some­thing some day!

  18. Jeff Borden said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    Beb,

    Sheesh, what’s a guy have to do, lol? I should be immune to that creep after eight years, but Cheney’s san­ti­mony and smug­ness always push my but­tons. One more exhibit, I guess, in my emo­tional retardation.

    We drink a lot of cof­fee around here, but I won­der how much more we’ll have to con­sume to do our fair share for energy independence.

  19. LA Mary said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Can I add Rush Lim­baugh to the list of peo­ple I have no desire to ever hear of , from, or about again? He’s a rich drug addict who deserves no atten­tion, no respect.

  20. Dexter said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Lin­den Nel­son was very inter­est­ing on the Frank Beck­mann Show on WJR this AM…’tis true: the movies are com­ing to The D.
    http://​www​.freep​.com/​a​p​p​s​/​p​b​c​s​.​d​l​l​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​?​A​I​D​=​2​0​0​9​9​0​2​030361

  21. Dexter said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:26 pm

  22. brian stouder said on February 4th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    Jeff — agreed.

    edit: Mary — Agreed!!

    The NY Times still hasn’t posted their red-pencil (or blue?) quiz answers…and it was a DIFFICULT quiz.

    It became appar­ent (to me, any­way) that the more you try to “fix” things, the more things appear to need fixing! — quite difficult.

    Any­way, I just wanna know whether the ‘just’ gets the red pen­cil in the first prob­lem. If I got noth­ing else cor­rect except just that one thing, than I’ll be happy as a pig in mud!

    btw — Just found out that our W2’s are all incor­rect, and they will be re-issued. As it hap­pens, we were await­ing other doc­u­ments any­way; but we came that close to Daschle­ing our taxes all to hell! (A buddy told me that Wes­ley Snipes is going to be nom­i­nated to an admin­is­tra­tion position…)

  23. Gasman said on February 4th, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    One more attempt at sub­ject change.

    This might be the one head­line from CNN​.com that I get printed on a T-shirt:

    “Healthy kid­ney removed through donor’s vagina”

    http://​www​.cnn​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​H​E​A​L​T​H​/​0​2​/​0​3​/​k​i​d​n​e​y​.​v​a​g​i​n​a​.​s​u​r​g​e​r​y​/​i​n​d​e​x.html

    Ewww!

  24. nancy said on February 4th, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    That wasn’t all that amaz­ing to me. My BFF just got her uterus removed the same way; it’s just a few extra inches of reach.

    Liked the Slate head­line, however:

    Vagi­nal Innard Course

  25. brian stouder said on February 4th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    A post script on the traf­fic sign link Nance posted the other day:

    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​2​9​0​17293/

    …in Indiana’s Hamil­ton County, the elec­tronic mes­sage on a board in Carmel’s con­struc­tion zone warned dri­vers of “RAPTORS AHEAD — CAUTION.“And signs in Austin, Texas, recently flashed: “NAZI ZOMBIES! RUN!!!” and “ZOMBIES IN AREA! RUN.” Offi­cials in Illi­nois are con­cerned the rewrit­ten signs dis­tract motorists from heed­ing legit­i­mate haz­ards down the road. The hacked sign on Tues­day orig­i­nally warned dri­vers of crews replac­ing guardrails.

    And the punch line is:

    In Illi­nois, tam­per­ing with an offi­cial traf­fic con­trol device is a mis­de­meanor pun­ish­able by up to a $250 fine — half what a cul­prit might have to pay in Texas if caught. If con­victed in Indi­ana, a cul­prit faces up to a year in jail and $5,000 in fines.

    If’n you get froggy in Indi­ana, be warned: Homey don’t play dat shit!

  26. JGW said on February 4th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    Aeroflot, wow where to begin. I’m an air­lin­ers nut and divide my time between here and A.net (air​lin​ers​.net). I love the old Russ­ian metal, like IL-62, Tu-154, etc. Wish I could fly on one some­time. Their famed for the use of over­head recov­ery, basi­cally a mil­i­tary approach to approach and land­ing. You basi­cally fly toward the air­port pretty much at an alti­tude above 10,000 feet. Then you spi­ral down in a very tight pat­tern, not like a stan­dard pat­tern here. They dive in to land because that’s how the Russ­ian air force taught them, helps to avoid SAM’s. I think my favorite Aeroflot story involved an Air­bus, not a Soviet era jet. On a long leg over Siberia the pilot decided it would be OK to let his teenage son fly the plane (it was on autopi­lot). The pilot showed him how to adjust head­ing and speeds, etc. At some point the son acci­den­tally nudged the con­trols and the plane pro­gressed from an almost inperctible turn to a high G death spi­ral. The had to yank the kid out due to the G forces and they couldn’t get con­trol back and ker-splat. They also had a con­trolled ditch­ing in the 1960’s while test­ing a new Tupolev. The gear wouldn’t come down and they flew around until fuel became an issue. Then they decided in prac­ti­cal terms that they should take the fire axe and chop trough the floor, hop­ing they could get to the gear and drop it man­u­ally. They hacked the crap out of the cabin floor, no luck on the gear, so they landed in a river. A Soviet Sully.

    That story and more Russ­ian fun is on tap at:

    http://​eng​lishrus​sia​.com/​?​p=2201

    On another topic — Am I the only one spooked by Cheney’s crap about a nuclear ter­ror­ist attack. If that hap­pens it will likely be from the bomb hid­den under Cheney’s tool shed. What both­ers me is that long before 9 – 11 the gov­ern­ment played up Bin Laden as evil incar­nate and to me it was smelling like a telegraphed punch.

    Heck he’s still foot­loose and fancy free, quak­ing in his san­dals, but not in a cave. I’ve heard well sourced rumors he is on ice and has been since 2004. He’s more use­ful as a gob­lin than a martyr.

    I still say those moron Saudis and Bin Laden couldn’t crash a car into a falafel stand yet alone pull this one off with­out some­one see­ing it com­ing. Tom Clancy spelled out the basics ten years before 9 – 11 in Debt of Honor. I lost two friends on 9 – 11 and my fam­ily spent 8 hours think­ing my cousin’s wife was dead. Her last call was “I’m still on the 17th floor and it’s start­ing to come down.” She was OK but my aunt had a lot to deal with that afternoon.

    So if a city gets nuked I say look at the Occam’s Razor answer. And those bas­tards will go for NYC.…. Elim­i­nate the lib­er­als in a quick stroke and hit the reset button.

    OK, I’m start­ing to sound like Cal­iban but I found Cheney’s remarks to be scary, it was just like the OBL scare every­one warmup in the late Clin­ton years and the early Bush days.

  27. jeff borden said on February 4th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

    After los­ing three clients in the past six weeks and with lit­tle or no prospect of replac­ing them in the fore­see­able future, I am pon­der­ing a career change.

    Hence­forth, I will be called Tom the Plumber.

    Like my role model, Joe the Plumber, I am actu­ally not a licensed plumber. And like my role model, Joe the Plumber, my first name is not really Joe. Unlike my role model, Joe the Plumber, I do not have any tax liens against me, but if this year con­tin­ues, per­haps I can accom­plish that feat, too. I also intend to bang my head against the wall for as long as it takes to lower my IQ sub­stan­tially to the level of my role model, Joe the Plumber.

    Thus, I should be well-positioned to be a pun­dit, a cam­paigner, a war cor­re­spon­dent, an eco­nomic adviser to the Repub­li­can Party and a cos­mic star to which con­ser­v­a­tives will be drawn like moths to flame.

    I men­tion this because I see that my role model, Joe the Plumber, is call­ing the stim­u­lus pack­age “wel­fare” and say­ing that the only thing Repub­li­cans need to do in the face of the worst eco­nomic down­turn since the Depres­sion is “cut bills and kick ass.” And he is draw­ing cheers and huz­zahs from the GOP.

    If this portly bald loser from North­west Ohio can do it, I believe a skinny bald guy from Chicago can, too.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Tom the Plumber

  28. Deborah said on February 4th, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    “but we came that close to Daschle­ing our taxes all to hell!” A new term is born — Daschle­ing your taxes. Sounds like a keeper. It’s got stick­ing power.

  29. MichaelG said on February 4th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    I’m already tired of the Obama admin kiss­ing Repub­li­can ass. Read Josh Mar­shall or don’t if you don’t want to get depressed. More. And the sit­u­a­tion her in Calif is rapidly approach­ing the cliff and the geniusesses (what is that plural any­way?) under the dome are just whistling. They lack the tal­ent to fid­dle. I think I’ll turn to drugs. Maybe I can bum a hit from Phelps.

  30. paddyo' said on February 4th, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    “Rap­tors ahead” … ahh, I’ve passed “EAGLES ON HIGHWAY” on I-70 in east­ern Utah many times dri­ving home to Nevada to visit fam­ily and friends, and often won­dered how come that rock band never wan­dered out there to do the oblig­a­tory album cover photo shoot along­side those diamond-shaped yel­low warnings …

    As for reach­ing “that age” when folks start dying all around you — or, at any rate, when you start notic­ing it more — yes, a friend and fel­low recov­er­ing news­pa­per reporter took ill over the week­end after Thanks­giv­ing while vis­it­ing fam­ily, got home to Philadel­phia and appar­ently died right there, alone, in his house. A big attack on an over­sized (lit­er­ally) heart.
    For­tu­nately, Larry and his sis­ter exchanged a daily e-mail and she was able to get friends/ex-colleagues from the Inky to go by to check on him before too long. (A very good rea­son for those of us who are sin­gle to do the same, no?) He was a year or two older than I, but not yet 60.
    For some rea­son, that one really reg­is­tered. I expect that sen­sa­tion will only become more common …

  31. Jeff Borden said on February 4th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Michael,

    I also have been dis­ap­pointed with the O-man, but then I have to remind myself it has been exactly two weeks since he took office. I also have to remind myself that many times dur­ing the cam­paign I thought he was off in the wrong direc­tion and each time he sur­prised me.

    My guess is he has adopted this strat­egy for a reason…probably to paint him­self as an accom­mo­dat­ing leader who is try­ing to live up to his rhetoric about mov­ing beyond par­ti­san labels…but also to iso­late the Repub­li­cans as petu­lant, obstruc­tion­ist par­ti­sans who would rather see mil­lions of Amer­i­cans suf­fer and our econ­omy col­lapse rather than cooperate.

    It is truly hard for me to under­stand how the GOP has reached this state of mori­bund intel­lect, where the only thing the party knows how to do is demo­nize its rivals. Just as it is hard for me to fathom how W. and Cheney emerged as great pro­tec­tors when the worst ter­ror­ist act in our nation not only occurred on their watch, but was pre­ceded by action­able intel­li­gence months before 9/11.

    A dead rat­tlesnake can still inflict a bite. An almost dead polit­i­cal party appar­ently can do the same thing. And both deal in poison.

  32. alex said on February 4th, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    What Jeff B said. The new head of the Repub­li­can Party (the fat white one, that is) has a lower approval rat­ing than Jere­miah Wright or Bill Ayres, accord­ing to this:

    http://​www​.thedai​ly​beast​.com/​b​l​o​g​s​-​a​n​d​-​s​t​o​r​i​e​s/2009 – 02-04/america-to-rush-drop-dead

    Whodda thunkit?

  33. joodyb said on February 4th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    pad­dyo’: your story is espe­cially instruc­tive fol­low­ing the demise of that poor fel­low in the book depos­i­tory. such a basic thing, to be aware of those in our daily midst. those gladys krav­itzes among us have their pur­pose in the world.

  34. MichaelG said on February 4th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    I hope you’re right, Jeff. It just looks like a famil­iar old pat­tern to me.

  35. brian stouder said on February 4th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    Alex, that was a GREAT arti­cle about Uncle Rush! I espe­cially liked this:

    Lim­baugh was the least pop­u­lar of the all the polit­i­cal fig­ures the firm polled. He polls seven points lower than Rev. Jere­miah “God Damn Amer­ica” Wright and eight points below for­mer Weather Under­ground domes­tic ter­ror­ist William Ayers.

    haha­ha­ha­ha­haha!!

  36. LA Mary said on February 4th, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    Stephen Col­bert really went after Rush last night. I was more aggres­sive than he usu­ally gets.

  37. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on February 4th, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    Purely per­sonal kvetch, borne of great weari­ness — i feel, in real-world space, let alone blo­gos­pher­i­cally, caught between fel­low wor­shipers who think cre­ation­ism is not only fine, but nor­ma­tive, and fel­low pro­fes­sion­als who think belief in any kind of spir­i­tual real­ity is the source of every sor­row in the world.

    Like­wise, i feel polit­i­cally caught between those who think a Human Life Amend­ment would result in cup­cakes and pup­pies for every­one, except abor­tion­ists who should crackle in McD style deep fry­ers for longer than it takes me to read a 1040 man­ual, and folks who really do believe Cheney wants to eat pup­pies like cup­cakes, using the Con­sti­tu­tion for parch­ment muf­fin lin­ers because he really just wants to make a for­tune for his Satanic bud­dies, while BusHitler tor­tures Gitmo cap­tives with excess carbs.

    I just want a month in New Zealand, prefer­ably by Hawkes Bay, morn­ings pick­ing kiwi fruit, and after­noons at the beach with a stack of Dick­ens and O’Brian and Davies and Irv­ing nov­els. (John or Wash­ing­ton.) Sun­days i’ll just preach to the koalas among the euca­lyp­tus trees.

  38. MichaelG said on February 4th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    Teens who ‘sext’ racy pho­tos charged with porn

    Feb 4, 3:38 PM (ET)

    By MARTHA IRVINE
    CHICAGO (AP) — Though youth is fleet­ing, images sent on a cell phone or posted online may not be, espe­cially if they’re naughty.
    Teenagers’ habit of dis­trib­ut­ing nude self-portraits elec­tron­i­cally — often called “sex­ting” if it’s done by cell phone — has par­ents and school admin­is­tra­tors wor­ried. Some pros­e­cu­tors have begun charg­ing teens who send and receive such images with child pornog­ra­phy and other seri­ous felonies. But is that the best way to han­dle it?
    “Hope­fully we’ll get the mes­sage out to these kids,” says Michael McAlexan­der, a pros­e­cu­tor in Allen County, Ind., which includes Fort Wayne. A teenage boy there is fac­ing felony obscen­ity charges for allegedly send­ing a photo of his pri­vate parts to sev­eral female class­mates. Another boy was recently charged with child pornog­ra­phy in a sim­i­lar case.
    In some cases, the pho­tos are sent to harass other teens or to get atten­tion. Other times, they’re viewed as a high-tech way to flirt. Either way, law enforce­ment offi­cials want it to stop, even if it means threat­en­ing to add “sex offender” to a juvenile’s con­fi­den­tial record.
    “We don’t want to throw these kids in jail,” McAlexan­der says. “But we want them to think

    http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090204/D964VRQG0.html

    This is incred­i­ble. Does that numb nuts pros­e­cu­tor have any idea what charg­ing kids with child porn can do to them? For­ever. What is he think­ing? Whence this peren­nial impulse to crim­i­nal­ize kids? Allen County, IN must be the most peace­ful, crime free place on earth if this is all the DA’s office has time to do. It must be won­der­ful. No mur­der, no rape, no rob­bery. No white col­lar crime. Gosh. What a utopia. Noth­ing but those awful hor­mone rid­den kids.

  39. beb said on February 4th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    Dog for­bid that a prosceu­tor ever be seen as soft on porn. So, yes, even though it could ruin a kid’s life, they will attempt to pun­ish these kids for send­ing dirty pic­tures of them­selves. This Chicago story isn’t first. It’s dumb for kids to do that But that’s kids for ya.

  40. brian stouder said on February 4th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    I think it’s a hel­luva prob­lem, really.

    Think about it. Once these under-aged nude pho­tos are cre­ated and sent, they are in the ether for­ever. If the pol­icy is that kids won’t be pros­e­cuted, then the (adult) sharks will exploit that loop­hole. (how much imag­i­na­tion does it take to con­jure up some scum­bag load­ing his kid­die porn files onto a phone that is nom­i­nally his kid’s? etc)

  41. JGW said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    Note to Tom the Plumber -
    Yes­ter­day I ran­domly descended to the place obscure com­puter parts go to die. My wife calls it the base­ment. I was look­ing for a DVi-VGA adapter. It’t not relevent to the story.
    I went down there to find a pin­hole leak from my water heater. Debated fix­ing it myself to avoid Apos­tolic land­lord grief. Due to a very tight clear­ance between the hot and cold lines instead of cut­ting out the T, I called the land­lord. Took him less than an hour or work minus three trips to Lowes.

    Since the elec­tric water heater got wet I left the breaker off for 24 hours. This morn­ing I went to turn it on and my gut said, at least go look. Well how about 6 inches of water at about 37 degrees and a pow­er­ful jet spray­ing from the main.

    Seems the land­lord tigh­t­end a drain relief on the main valve, and he cracked it. It burst some­time after he left and I enjoyed my bath­room after 10 hours of “If it’s yel­low, let it mellow.”

    Today the land­lord enjoyed 7 hours in the chilly base­ment. I had lunch in Fort Wayne and waited until my 17 year old called with an all clear message.…

    If it was only warmer and fil­tered I was close to the indoor pool I desire.

  42. MichaelG said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    I’m not quite sure what you, Beb and Brian, mean here. Are you in favor of pros­e­cut­ing these young­sters for what are extremely seri­ous crimes, in the inter­ests of some­how maybe pos­si­bly hope­fully pre­vent­ing the fur­ther dis­sem­i­na­tion of pic­tures that are already out there? Please clar­ify. I see some irony with Beb but none with Brian.

  43. MichaelG said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    Lord, JGW, I know. I’ve also replaced water heaters a day after they should have been replaced. I was lucky that the last one was in the garage so clean up was minor. We brought the new water heater back from Home Depot in a Geo Metro. Yep, one of those lit­tle shit boxes. I dropped the rear seat, ran the front pas­sen­ger seat all the way for­ward and reclined the back all the way. Then I cut a piece of ply­wood to fit. The new water heater lay on the ply­wood and the hatch even closed in the back. We had to take two cars. Pretty lucky. They had plum trees on sale that day and I stuffed one down the sun­roof on the Ford.

  44. JGW said on February 4th, 2009 at 11:51 pm

    Have to shame myslef. In a pre­vi­ous post I basi­cally used the word basi­cally as if I was basi­cally Car­o­line Kennedy (would not hit it) say­ing “You Know.” Well you know.

    EDIT — In a pre­vi­ous life I asso­ci­ated with a NJ lawyer and asst. pros­e­cu­tor who had Cape Cod roots and he and his brother divided their prac­tices between NYC, NJ, Cape Cod, and Palm Beach. Tough life. The brother of my asso­ciate was involved in the nephew raper case. What stuck with him is for all of their Kennedy money and power, the famed man­sion there has no cen­tral air, and they have win­dow units, and some rooms just have fans in the win­dow. Sounds like my house. With less booze and guilt.

  45. Dexter said on February 5th, 2009 at 12:00 am

    Yahoo has a video up…a snake’s remains have been found in Colom­bia, related to the boa constrictor…snakus gigan­ti­cus or some­thing like that…goddam thing was 45 feet long and snacked on crocs and could have eaten a COW.
    Sweet dreams :) ;)

  46. moe99 said on February 5th, 2009 at 1:02 am

    Ok, here’s my Russ­ian vodka story.

    In 1995 the head of the Antitrust sec­tion of the Wash­ing­ton Attor­ney General’s office spent a year in Belarus, teach­ing lawyers and other gov­ern­ment offi­cials about the laws of com­pe­ti­tion in the US and Europe. When his year was over, he got the gov­er­nor to pay for a del­e­ga­tion of Belaruss­ian offi­cials to come over to the US for a sev­eral week visit (with their KGB han­dlers too). When they arrived at the SeaTac air­port, they set off all the dogs in secu­rity, because along with the copi­ous amounts of vodka in their suit­cases, they had packed large quan­ti­ties of pig fat which they believed, if they ate before drink­ing their vodka, enabled them to drink that much more vodka.

    Well two other cou­ples and my ex and I hosted the group for din­ner one night and they brought vodka, lots of vodka with them. They opened the refrig­er­a­tor and the stove to make sure that they were real (they’d been told that American’s houses were stuffed with fake appli­ances). Then they got down to eat­ing our grilled salmon and drink­ing their vodka neat, which they did with furi­ous and sin­gle­minded aban­don, toast­ing all of us numer­ous times, and singing loud, long Russ­ian songs. We’d been warned about drink­ing, so all but the ex hus­band took very tiny sips to nurse our one shot glass for most of the evening.

    The ex (the cur­rent Trea­surer for the state of Washin­gon) was two sheets to the wind as a result of his attempts to keep up with the Rus­sians, and very vocally and exten­sively sick there­after (I have black­mail pic­tures somewhere).

    But they left 3/4 of a bot­tle of vodka with us as a part­ing gift for the evening, and I put it in my freezer and it lasted for almost two years. It was extremely good. I still have the bot­tle and the top name on it in cyril­lic is ‘rapevka’ only the e is back­wards and the v is upside down. and there are two dates to either side of that: 1893 on the left and 1993 on the right. The num­ber 100 is promi­nently dis­played in sil­ver under the other name on the vodka bot­tle which looks like ‘kpbi­w­tavb’ again with the v upside down.

    PS. The other good story to come out of their visit (at least the one that is print­able gen­er­ally) was when they went to Costco and were being shown around. The first ques­tion from a group mem­ber to the Costco rep­re­sen­ta­tive was, “But what do you do when you run out of all this stuff?”

  47. nancy said on February 5th, 2009 at 1:20 am

    That first name is, translit­er­ated, “garelka,” and what I can find via Google says it’s Beloruss­ian vodka — don’t know if it’s a brand name or just their own dialec­tal word for the stuff.

    The sec­ond word is “krish­tal,” which sounds like “crys­tal” and is likely some des­ig­na­tion of its qual­ity. 100 sounds like the proof, or, given the dates, maybe a des­ig­na­tion of its cen­tury mark.

    Vodka itself is a diminu­tive of “voda,” the word for water. Putting the “ka” end­ing on it implies mis­chief — Rus­sians have more ways to make diminu­tives and endear­ments than any other lan­guage. So Mikhail Barysh­nikov is Misha to his friends, Mishenka to his lover, and Mishka when he’s misbehaving.

    You see why so much great poetry was writ­ten in Russ­ian. All those harsh Ks and glot­tal sounds, but rhyme after rhyme in its endings.

  48. Catherine said on February 5th, 2009 at 1:35 am

    So when my cousin calls me Katrinka, is that a nice thing?

  49. Dexter said on February 5th, 2009 at 2:48 am

    Good story, moe99. I used to be friends with an old man who was a WWI vet­eran. He had a keen inter­est in the world, and he sub­scribed Soviet Life Mag­a­zine for me for sev­eral years. I learned a lot from that mag­a­zine, but the claim they made that Rus­sians always drank water glass sized tum­blers of vodka for break­fast, to wash down their pick­led cucum­bers , turned out to be not uni­ver­sally true. Most Rus­sians drink a glass of yogurt for break­fast, and have a hunk of sour rye bread and maybe have tea.
    If you want a primer on Rus­sia, this is as good as I have found:
    http://​www​.answers​.com/​t​o​p​i​c​/​russia

  50. whitebeard said on February 5th, 2009 at 2:53 am

    The cold­est cap­i­tal is not Moscow, to get really cold the Rus­sians must travel to Ottawa and expe­ri­ence the Cana­dian air masses first hand. I expected warmer weather when I moved to Con­necti­cut years ago but we have had the cold­est Jan­u­ary in 15 years and the tem­per­a­ture now is zero and the bath­room pipes have frozen again (about the 10th time this dreaded win­ter of win­ters).
    I am run­ning the elec­tric fan/heater in the bath­room to thaw the pipes and think­ing of the 45 degrees fore­cast for Chicago next week when I am there for the auto show press pre­views.
    I am not too wor­ried about leav­ing the house for Chicago because we have our handy­man liv­ing with us in the depths of win­ter while his house nears fore­clo­sure and the Grand Old Pub­lic util­ity has cut off his elec­tric­ity.
    Isn’t this depres­sion great, just what we needed to cleanse the econ­omy, the mar­kets, the hedge funds and the obscene bonuses from our sys­tem.
    Katrinka has a nice ring to it, with a hint of mis­chief in the air.

  51. Dexter said on February 5th, 2009 at 3:15 am

    white­bear­duka, I feel ya on those effin’ pipes…my upstairs faucet is run­ning a solid stream and I am about to check it again.
    It’s cold here, too…must be zero again, but no wind until day­light, I think the man said. Sat­ur­day can­not get here quickly enough…I have to bust-up that ice dam on top of my eavespout­ing.
    I have been one of the crazy-old-guys-on-a-bicycle-in-the-winter for over thirty years in this town, but not this win­ter.
    Since this stel­lar sea­son vis­ited its damna­tion upon us, I have cycled exactly 1/4 mile. Ice every­where, snow piled high, it seems it’s always about 8 degrees…
    well sir, Gas­man doesn’t like me stay­ing up this late, he gave me hell last night, told me to GO TO BED !
    I am scared he will chas­tise me again…off to Face­book and Twit­ter a while!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Eddie Schwartz has died in a Chicago nurs­ing home. He was a media junkie and long-time radio per­son­al­ity, and he was great on the radio…dead at 62.
    http://​www​.chicagotri​bune​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​c​h​i​-​h​e​d​-​e​d​s​c​h​w​a​r​t​z​-​0​5​-​f​e​b​0​5​,​0​,​3​0​9​7​4​4​6​.story

  52. brian stouder said on February 5th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Well, hell. I com­pre­hen­sively failed that edit­ing quiz

    http://​top​ics​.blogs​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​2​/​0​4​/​q​u​i​z​-​a​n​s​w​ers-2/

    but the unkind­est cut is that they just could not care less about the word “just” in the first prob­lem. I fooled and fooled with that para­graph, and do you know what the sum total of their fix was?

    1. The last sen­tence includes a so-called comma splice: two inde­pen­dent clauses joined only by a comma. A semi­colon or per­haps a dash would work.

    That’s it! There ain’t no more! I now admit to myself that copy edit­ing isn’t in my future (let alone my ‘present’!)

    btw MichaelG — all I meant about the sex­ting thing was that I DO want a vig­or­ous offi­cial (crim­i­nal jus­tice) response or inter­est in these cases, so as to keep it rare. I’m all for flex­i­bil­ity within that response, but in essence this seems to reduce to “sex­ting” = “child sexploitation”

  53. Kirk said on February 5th, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Brian, kudos to you for hav­ing the courage to put your edit­ing quiz answer out there for all to see. Believe it or not, I would have changed that comma to a semi­colon and left the “just,” too, but I have been paid for a long time to fig­ure out such things “Just” is overused, but it serves a pur­pose there, I think.

    I didn’t get seri­ous about answer­ing the oth­ers, but I did give them a look, and they’re def­i­nitely tough ones.

  54. LA Mary said on February 5th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    MichaelG,
    I have done the same errand in a 1980 Dodge Colt. Water heater in the Colt and an olive tree in the other car, which was a 1974 Kar­mann Ghia. There must be some­thing in the water here in CA.
    Speak­ing of which, where’s Danny been lately?

  55. brian stouder said on February 5th, 2009 at 11:25 am

    Alex would say (and he begins to sway me!) Danny has been leav­ing his mark here under a nom de plume

  56. Ricardo said on February 7th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    I say to the crit­ics of Michael Phelps: Next time you go to the Olympics instead of Michael Phelps. You bet­ter come home with mul­ti­ple gold medals, oth­er­wise keep quiet.

    As for pot, it comes out of the ground and you smoke it or ingest. What could be more nat­ural than that? How many ingre­di­ents and how much pro­cess­ing does it take to make scotch?

  57. Gasman said on February 7th, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    Ricardo,
    It takes three ingre­di­ents to make Scotch: water, malted bar­ley, and yeast. The ingre­di­ents are strictly reg­u­lated and you can be sure that any Scotch you buy is going to be free of unknown impurities.

    Unless you grow your own dope you have no idea what the hell you are smok­ing. You assume that the grow­ers aren’t adding nasty-ass chem­i­cals like fer­til­iz­ers and such. That is fool­ish. The crop, after all, is ille­gal. It’s not like pro­duc­ers have much to fear from the FDA.

    Scotch is health food com­pared to dope.