nancynall.com » Exit, leaving no footprints.

Exit, leaving no footprints.

A few sug­ges­tions for Pres­i­dent Obama’s first Supreme Court nomination:

Bill Ayers (thanks, Gas­man);
His wife, the lovely and unre­pen­tant domes­tic ter­ror­ist Berna­dine Dohrn;
Squeaky Fromme (after a pres­i­den­tial par­don);
Some home­less guy who now forges sig­na­tures for ACORN.

The pos­si­bil­i­ties are end­less, really. I’m putting my money on “a mod­er­ate Demo­c­rat with XX chromosomes.”

They say David Souter, the retir­ing jus­tice, hates Wash­ing­ton and aches to get back to New Hamp­shire. “They” have to say it because, as usual, Souter says noth­ing. When he was nom­i­nated I recall a Mark Rus­sell song about him, called “The Man Who Has No Foot­prints.” I know there are many peo­ple in this coun­try who delight in court-watching, peo­ple who in another time would have made excel­lent Krem­li­nol­o­gists, spend­ing months ana­lyz­ing body lan­guage and posi­tion in the May Day pho­to­graph, but I’m not one of them. I think their pro­ceed­ings should be on tele­vi­sion, too. All it takes is one Clarence Thomas to queer you on the idea of the Gang of Nine as some sort of coun­cil of divine mandarins.

Souter must be insane. I can hardly blame him for hat­ing Wash­ing­ton, but on his cur­rent work sched­ule he can enjoy his New Hamp­shire home four months of the year, the best four months (in New Hamp­shire, any­way). The guy must love win­ter, I guess. Once he’s retired he can go on leav­ing no foot­prints up there, year-round. Noth­ing like Ver­mont and New Hamp­shire for pri­vacy pro­tec­tion. Solzhen­it­syn found it a nice, cold, media-free sim­u­lacrum of Rus­sia. You won­der why more of these camera-shunning Hol­ly­wood nin­nies don’t buy houses up there — it’s cer­tainly pretty enough. On my sole trip to Ver­mont, nearly oh-my-god 30 years ago, I recall: Hardly any free­ways, every town a small one. (Mont­pe­lier is smaller than Grosse Pointe Woods.) Very scenic, gen­eral stores, the whole bit. New Hamp­shire, which we drove across to get to Ver­mont — much the same, plus an valued-out-of-proportion primary.

Well, god­speed, Jus­tice Souter. The best job in the world, fol­lowed by the cushi­est retire­ment. Enjoy it.

Good to see the out­stand­ing Nina Toten­berg broke the story. For some media out­lets, cov­er­ing the court is sort of like being on the court — a life­time appoint­ment. No one can say she hasn’t left big foot­prints, how­ever. She’s going to be a hard act to follow.

From her report:

Rather than fly home, Souter pre­ferred to drive. He also resisted other forms of con­tem­po­rary tech­nol­ogy and con­ve­nience, hold­ing out against the cell phone and e-mail and con­tin­u­ing to write his opin­ions and dis­sents in long­hand, using a foun­tain pen.

Another tech­no­log­i­cal stick-in-the-mud! What is it about writ­ing that makes peo­ple so loathe to change their ways? (I don’t know how any­one writes in long­hand, any­more. My brain moves so much faster than my pen these days it would be like run­ning a race with one foot in a bucket of cement. I can barely write a check any­more.) On the other hand, good for him for spurn­ing e-mail. I watched “Rachel Get­ting Mar­ried” last week. My favorite line, from the addict Kim: “She never responded to my amends e-mail. I hate it when peo­ple won’t meet you halfway.” A cou­ple years ago I told a friend her ex-husband had got­ten a big job he’d been after for a while. “I’ll have to send him a con­grat­u­la­tory e-mail,” she said. I replied: “Yes, for when only the least you can do will do, the con­grat­u­la­tory e-mail.”

I’m sure you lawyer types will bat this sub­ject around in the com­ments, so have at it. Please, ladies and gen­tle­man, no hit­ting below the belt.

NPR had a a piece on Snow­ball the danc­ing cock­a­too last night, which prompted me to look up his YouTube col­lec­tion. This being NPR, the story was on research into whether ani­mals really can coor­di­nate move­ment to music, but me being me, I was mainly inter­ested in the yuks. Snowball’s open­ing act was to a Back­street Boys track, but I really pre­fer his inter­pre­tive rou­tine to Ste­vie Nicks.

I’ve always liked birds like this, although I’d never own one. When Kate was a tod­dler I used to take her to a local pet store where they had about half a dozen par­rots, macaws and cock­a­toos, none for sale, that talked and inter­acted with cus­tomers with­out fail. My favorite was Smoky, an African gray, who loved to make this sound: A descend­ing whis­tle, a muf­fled explo­sion and then, “Bombs away!” It reminded me of a par­rot in a Carl Hiaasen novel, who’d been lib­er­ated from a drug dealer’s home after its owner was shot to death. DEA agents taught it to say, “Duck, shithead!”

A lit­tle TGIF blog­gage? OK:

Did you know the Keep Your Dis­tance Bug Vac­uum not only exists, but is a big seller? Now you do. Sky­Mall cat­a­logs: The middle-class man’s Archie McPhee.

Finally, if you missed Coozledad’s most excel­lent descrip­tion of a day on the farm yes­ter­day, you missed some­thing that prompted a writer with a national pro­file to e-mail and say, “I’d read a whole book of sto­ries like that.” Me, too, but Coo­zledad says he lacks the moti­va­tion. As a con­so­la­tion prize, he sends along a pic­ture of the farm’s newest res­i­dent, Bodankey:

Bodankey

I can’t top this. Have a great weekend.

95 responses to
“Exit, leaving no footprints.”

  1. Jolene said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:25 am

    Awwwwwwwww. So cuuuuute.

  2. cconfoy said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:30 am

    It’s strange that Jus­tice Souter can’t abide cell phones and email. It must be that he has no time left after updat­ing his Face­book pro­file and Twit­ter­ing away the days.

  3. brian stouder said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Agreed, Jolene!

    “I’d read a whole book of sto­ries like that.”

    Really? I guess the great appeal of barn­yard lan­guage (along with fine wines and oper­atic bal­let) is sim­ply lost on me, but whatever

  4. mark said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:33 am

    I’ll tee off on the Supreme Court nominee.

    First, I think Pres­i­dents should get a lot of dis­cre­tion on judi­cial appoint­ments, so no fil­i­buster unless it is Bill Ayres. Have a rea­son­able num­ber of hear­ings, debate, etc., then vote.

    Sec­ond, I hope it is some­one from within the fed­eral judi­ciary. There are lots of bril­liant thinkers with good judi­cial tem­pera­ment there, many quite lib­eral. Please, no more Souters. And please no Sen­a­tors. Although this could be an oppor­tu­nuity to off-load Joe Biden to a more secure loca­tion. Give him a chance to proof-read his gaffes before he pub­lishes them.

    Third, I don’t give a damn what their view is on abor­tion and I would give a lot to not have to hear the zealots on that issue gnash their teeth and make out­ra­geous pre­dic­tions. I’m gen­er­ally pro-life, but I’m tired of the issue screw­ing up judi­cial appointments.

    Fourth, I wouldn’t mind see­ing David Hamil­ton from Indi­ana, cur­rently nom­i­nated to the Sev­enth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals, be con­sid­ered. Great mind, excel­lent judge and writer. Prob­a­bly won’t happen.

    And thanks for the shot of Bodankey at the bar.

  5. Randy said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:36 am

    My boss is no techno­phobe, but she hand­writes notes in nearly every meet­ing. She cat­a­logues and retains them for a while, like a year or so, and refers back to them when necessary.

  6. moe99 said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:42 am

    I hate to spec­u­late on who the nom­i­nee will be. Big waste of time. I’d rather wait until the nom­i­na­tion is made. That is when the sparks should fly based upon past experience.

  7. jeff borden said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:43 am

    Mark,

    Those are all excel­lent sug­ges­tions. Since Pres­i­dent Obama has a strong legal back­ground, he prob­a­bly shares your belief that a seat on the Supreme Court should go to some­one who has abju­di­cated cases at the fed­eral level. I’d like to see some­one seated who is not so in thrall to the power struc­ture as Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito, but also some­one with the intel­lec­tual heft to engage Scalia’s dys­pep­tic view of the world. Lots of lib­er­als love to snark on Clarence Thomas, but it’s the sheer nas­ti­ness and pet­ti­ness of Nino that pushes my but­tons. He’s clearly a bril­liant guy, but a bully and a power worshipper.

    Any­how, I hope the deci­sion is a wise one. I sus­pect it will.

  8. Jolene said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:44 am

    All the TV talk­ers, mark, are say­ing that the new jus­tice will be a woman, a His­panic, or, even bet­ter, a His­panic woman. Lots of dis­cus­sions online re dis­tin­guished can­di­dates who fit in one or both or those cat­e­gories – an appeals court judge, the cur­rent solic­i­tor gen­eral, and so on and on.

  9. Gasman said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:59 am

    Mazel tov, Bodankey! Wel­come to the world.

    nancy,
    I, too heard the NPR story about Snow­ball and saw the YouTube clips. As some­one who has had sev­eral cock­atiels (smaller cousins of the cock­a­too) I know first­hand that par­rots def­i­nitely can under­stand impor­tant aspects of human music.

    Our male cock­atiel Cory used to whis­tle the word­less refrain from the Queen of the Night’s Act I aria in Mozart’s Magic Flute. Over time, like any good jazz musi­cian, he would frag­ment and vary the melody to suit his tastes. By the time he was fin­ished with it few peo­ple would have rec­og­nized its ori­gins. How­ever, he lacked Snowball’s very phys­i­cal sense of rhythm.

    I had actu­ally seen Snow­ball on Letterman’s “Stu­pid Pet Tricks” from the recent past. He seemed to be spooked by the crowd (Snow­ball, not Let­ter­man) and was off his game.

    My favorite Nina Toten­berg inci­dent was she was cov­er­ing the Clarence Thomas nom­i­na­tion. It was Toten­berg who broke the Anita Hill angle on NPR’s “Week­end Edi­tion.” I remem­ber hear­ing her story and her sub­se­quent appear­ance with for­mer Sen­a­tor Alan Simp­son on “Night­line.” Toten­berg her­self leads the following:

    “When I walked into the Capi­tol on Mon­day morn­ing the place was erupt­ing. The fax machines were vapor­iz­ing; the phones were jammed; I was almost as sur­prised as those male sen­a­tors were. They could not push through a vote the next day as they had hoped,” Toten­berg said. Days after the report aired, Toten­berg found her­self under attack. The report dis­cred­ited Clarence Thomas’s sup­port­ers, who had pro­moted his char­ac­ter over his lack­lus­ter legal qual­i­fi­ca­tions. It embroiled the Sen­ate Judi­ciary Com­mit­tee, as its mem­bers had largely down­played or out­right ignored Anita Hill’s claims. Indi­vid­ual sen­a­tors were also quick to pounce on Toten­berg for what they called “biased” report­ing. A heated on-camera dis­cus­sion between Toten­berg and Repub­li­can Sen­a­tor Alan K. Simp­son of Wyoming on a Night­line episode devoted to Hill’s alle­ga­tions turned into “a full-tilt, epithet-strewn melee” after­wards in the ABC park­ing lot, accord­ing to Van­ity Fair’s Ann Bardach.

    The above is from a very good arti­cle on Toten­berg from the Paley Cen­ter for Media. As the reporter who was blamed by the Repub­li­cans for expos­ing the whole Thomas/Hill affair, Toten­berg was tar­geted by the fair minded seek­ers of jus­tice that made up the Repub­li­can Party. Not much has changed, has it? As chair­man of the Judi­ciary Com­mit­tee, cur­rent Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden fig­ured promi­nently in those events.

    I admire any woman that could go toe to toe in an obscen­ity laden shout­ing match with Alan Simp­son. That was some­thing that I always wanted to do. She also pissed off J. Edgar Hoover with her story about him. Her facts were so metic­u­lously doc­u­mented that she eas­ily fended off Hoover’s cries of a smear. Read the arti­cle above for the whole story.

  10. mark said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:09 am

    jolene,

    Yes, I’d for­got­ten that we are over­stocked on white men. Plenty of tal­ent in every fla­vor, so why not vary the menu.

    Thank God I won’t have to wit­ness another choice like Hariet Meiers. That was the final straw for me with Bush.

  11. brian stouder said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:27 am

    Gas­man — thanks very much for the link to that superb Toten­berg arti­cle; very good stuff!

  12. Peter said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:28 am

    Hariet Meiers — holy cow, I com­pletely for­got about her. Now I have to gouge my eyes out.

    Speak­ing of birds, I was born in beau­ti­ful Aurora, Illi­nois (cue Wayne’s World..) and at the time they had a flam­boy­ant mayor who loved to do stunts for the news­reels, one of which was appoint­ing a talk­ing par­rot as police chief.

  13. LA Mary said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:32 am

    Gas­man, that was what solid­i­fied my admi­ra­tion for Nina Toten­berg. She was amaz­ing dur­ing the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas mess. I was tak­ing some grad classes at the time, and the teacher opened class one night with by say­ing, “tonight’s class will be ded­i­cated to Nina Totenberg.”

  14. Gasman said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Toten­berg did good work expos­ing the Thomas/Hill con­nec­tion, how­ever, when she told Alan Simp­son to, “Go fuck your­self,” her stock rose immea­sur­ably in my eyes. Simp­son always got under my skin. He reeked of an air of impe­ri­ous dif­fi­dence. He tended to treat his oppo­nents like they were some­thing offen­sive he’d stepped in.

    As I recall their exchange on “Night­line,” I had the dis­tinct impres­sion that Toten­berg was doing her best to hold back the tor­rent of obscen­i­ties that she so des­per­ately wanted to direct at Simp­son. Simp­son unfairly accused her of lib­eral bias because she had the audac­ity to uncover some dirt on Thomas that the Judi­ciary Com­mit­tee knew about, but had cho­sen to keep secret. Toten­berg merely told us what they already knew.

    Simp­son was one of the orig­i­nal mod­ern Repub­li­can bul­lies. When he wanted to, he could be very mean.

  15. coozledad said on May 1st, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Snow­ball is a hoot. I’ll have to play that for our cock­atiel, Balto. He has sim­i­lar moves, but you have to jump through a whole lot of hoops to get him to do them. The film of me and my wife lurch­ing around the house with socks on our hands in order to get Balto to dance for thirty sec­onds might be of inter­est to behaviorists.

  16. Sue said on May 1st, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    I worked for a man who didn’t write his orig­i­nal doc­u­ments in long­hand (he dic­tated), but he loved loved loved to revise and edit. We would get revi­sions back five or six times (the record was eleven; after awhile we started hav­ing con­tests to see who got the most), filled with hiero­glyphs and arrows point­ing every­where, before they were done to his sat­is­fac­tion. The revi­sions would come back with cof­fee rings and pieces of food on them (sticky orange bits were com­mon). He had a com­puter and didn’t use it, obvi­ously. I felt sorry for myself until I talked to one of his orig­i­nal sec­re­taries who told me he used to do this even before the days of word pro­cess­ing. Now that’s some evil boss behav­ior. The year after he retired, one sec­re­tary was finally allowed to go back to her orig­i­nal depart­ment due to the reduced work­load and our department’s paper use count went down by 87,000.

  17. Danny said on May 1st, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    Thank God I won’t have to wit­ness another choice like Hariet Meiers. That was the final straw for me with Bush.

    C’mon, Mark. Didn’t you hear that she was a trail-blazer?

  18. Mindy said on May 1st, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    My father-in-law spent many years repair­ing gui­tar ampli­fiers and elec­tronic organs. Years ago he arrived ahead of sched­ule to work on an organ in a pri­vate res­i­dence. He knocked on the door and plainly heard a man say “Come on in, the door’s open!” The door was indeed open, so he went in. No one was there but a large par­rot on a stand in the cor­ner. He had the organ dis­as­sem­bled and was con­cen­trat­ing on the repair when a lady in a bathrobe with her hair in a towel came into the room and jumped at the sight of him. She shouted, “Oh, that damn bird! How does he always know when I for­get to lock the door?”

  19. nancy said on May 1st, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    One of my bosses had a cock­atiel, Ozzie, that whis­tled the Andy Grif­fith theme song. It was funny and enchant­ing when he learned it, and my boss was pretty pissed when he saw a tape of another bird doing the same thing win $10K on “America’s Fun­ni­est Home Videos” one night. Any­way, like you said, Gas­man, he played it like Coltrane — mix­ing the phrases up, repeat­ing them over and over (he really liked that high-note pas­sage in the mid­dle). It’s how they learn, it turns out; they don’t do beginning-to-end com­po­si­tion, but a series of phrases.

    The other funny thing about him was his reac­tion to the open­ing cred­its of “North­ern Expo­sure.” The theme started with the cry of an eagle, and it never failed to freak him out.

    Ozzie died when a neighbor’s cat came in through the dog door one night. Very sad.

  20. LA Mary said on May 1st, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Mindy, that has to be the begin­ning of a dirty joke. Organ? Bird? Woman in bathrobe?

  21. beb said on May 1st, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    if you missed Coozledad’s most excel­lent descrip­tion of a day on the farm yes­ter­day, you missed some­thing that prompted a writer with a national pro­file to e-mail and say, “I’d read a whole book of sto­ries like that.”

    What, you get e-mails from Mitch albom? (Just kidding)

    I don’t know if I’d read a whole book of sto­ries like that but I wouldn’t mind the occa­sional col­umn. The pic­ture is cuter than kit­tens, and it’s pretty hard for any­thing to be cuter than kittens.

    For Supreme Court jus­tice I’d like to see Jonathan Tur­ley, the guy Olber­mann has on all the time, the one that insists Obama is required by law to pros­e­cute Cheney, et al, for war crimes. For John Dean, who may be a con­ser­v­a­tive but believes strongly in the rule of law. And is a strong voice for it. There are too many — Scalia, Roberts, Thomas so see essen­tially lawless.

  22. paddyo' said on May 1st, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    Nice words about Nina Toten­berg, a joy to lis­ten to whether the SCOTUS is in ses­sion or not …

    I met her once, early in 1983. As a young “loaner” to USA TODAY, I had been dis­patched across the Potomac to the NPR news­room to cover their big finan­cial cri­sis (which resulted in restruc­tur­ing, lay­offs, etc. — gee kids, just like the news biz today!).

    I talked to sev­eral folks there, both on– and off-air voices, but it was Nina T. who was most gen­er­ous with her time and will­ing to talk about NPR, which in those days was still a lit­tle bit invis­i­ble in the DC media-go-round (like the young McPa­per was, too).

  23. Danny said on May 1st, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Mindy, that has to be the begin­ning of a dirty joke. Organ? Bird? Woman in bathrobe

    Mary, and it already has the under­pin­nings of a “knock-knock” joke. It’s prac­ti­cally com­edy gold!

  24. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 1st, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Re: “North­ern Expo­sure” open­ing — it’s a red tailed hawk call, and i can see why it would worry a bird.

    Happy May Day, y’all, and time for a song:

    Debout, les damnés de la terre
    Debout, les forçats de la faim
    La rai­son tonne en son cratère
    C’est l’éruption de la fin
    Du passé faisons table rase
    Foules, esclaves, debout, debout
    Le monde va changer de base
    Nous ne sommes rien, soyons tout
    C’est la lutte finale
    Groupons-nous, et demain
    L’Internationale
    Sera le genre humain

  25. Gasman said on May 1st, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Com­poser Bruce Adolphe, who does the seg­ment “Piano Puz­zlers” on Per­for­mance Today has a par­rot named Polly Rhythm. NPR did a seg­ment about Polly sev­eral years ago. As Adolphe has lots of musi­cians in and out of his place for var­i­ous rehearsals, Polly has been exposed to real musi­cians mak­ing music. As I recall, Polly loves to sing opera. She was quite good at mim­ic­k­ing the tone, vibrato and all, of a col­oratura soprano. She would sing in the appro­pri­ate lan­guage, not just a whis­tled ver­sion, I believe. I don’t have time to research that story, but I’d be inter­ested to hear it again.

  26. Jean S said on May 1st, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    I’ve been whistling L’Internationale the last day or so. Oh for a cock­atiel that knew it and could be given as a present to Ole Rush-bo.

  27. Joe Kobiela said on May 1st, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    Nancy,
    Isn’t it about time to launch the boat??
    Wait­ing for pic­tures and descrip­tion of the annual dis­cus­sion between you and your mate. Tak­ing a char­ter out to put-in-bay tonight before I go to Ypsi­lanti and Cleve­land I’ll look down and wave at you all.
    Pilot Joe

  28. brian stouder said on May 1st, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    For­get May Day — it’s game night, baby! (tonight I host, and I think we’re going to play a game called Pom­peii, wherein play­ers spend the first part of the game plac­ing peo­ple into the city, and then the last part evac­u­at­ing them out before they’re buried by ash…fun stuff!)

    This sen­tence stuck with me, as the habits of writ­ers has come up a time or two, lately

    I don’t know how any­one writes in long­hand, any­more. My brain moves so much faster than my pen these days it would be like run­ning a race with one foot in a bucket of cement

    PJ O’Roarke was on 60 Min­utes (I think) and showed the trusty IBM Selec­tric he writes on. He has a cache of five more, against the even­tual fail­ure of these things.

    Pre­sume­ably the main goal for PJ (and WFB with his ancient soft­ware) is comfort…but the Jus­tice who insists on writ­ing long­hand, which Nance responded to, reminded me of Shelby Foote, who said he always wrote with a dippy quill pen; he said it slowed him down and made him think things over. But also, one assumes he just really wanted to BE an ink-stained wretch, and smell the work in process; he wanted to really and truly ‘get his hands dirty’ and expe­ri­ence the writ­ing process.

    My nickle psycho-theory is that the never-married bach­e­lor from NH also needed that per­sonal involve­ment in the writ­ing he was doing.

    But in any case, behind such peo­ple there are (no doubt) under­paid cler­i­cal peo­ple who word-process the words these writ­ers produce

  29. Dexter said on May 1st, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Sour grapes…it is May Day, but we had to call it “Law Day” when I was a high school kid…lawyers in the assembly-gym, telling us of the per­ils of evil-doing and giv­ing us a workshop-lecture on how they pros­e­cute even the most least-offensive misdemeanors.

    We were never told of the 1886 Hay­mar­ket Mas­sacre, never told of the peo­ple that died fight­ing for the eight-hour day, never told of how the Chicago Anar­chists were framed and exe­cuted.
    And while I dis­cov­ered the whole, true story on my own, I’d bet most folks have for­got­ten 1886, or never heard of the events lead­ing up the mas­sacre. It’s an amaz­ing, cov­ered up, passed-over part of Amer­i­can history.

  30. brian stouder said on May 1st, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    amaz­ing, cov­ered up, passed-over part of Amer­i­can history.

    Dex­ter, there’s a LOT of that! The Spring­field, Illi­nois race riot back in 1908 (was it?) might prop­erly be viewed as peo­ple act­ing on geno­ci­dal impulses.

    For that mat­ter, think about how plu­to­crats acted in the late 19th and early 20th cen­tury, com­pared to now. Guys like Her­shey and Pull­man — and to some extent Ford, had some sort of an ideal soci­ety in mind, and then worked to bring them into being. Sort of off-putting, when you think about it — except NOW lots of plu­to­crats sim­ply out-source the work, with­out much care at all…which raises the ques­tion of which is worse? An in-your-face, vision­ary molder-of-society, or a go-to-hell bot­tom­line guy?

    This is why reflex­ive defense of abstrac­tions like “the free mar­kets” and gen­u­flec­tion to our ‘found­ing fathers’ never impresses me.

  31. moe99 said on May 1st, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Talk­ing about cov­ered up his­tory, here in Wash­ing­ton state, no one talks or teaches about the Wob­blie upris­ing post WW1 and Rus­siand rev­o­lu­tion, when one wob­blie mem­ber, Wes­ley Ever­est, was cas­trated, tor­tured and then hung by the out­raged busi­ness inter­ests in Cen­tralia, WA after pro­vok­ing a vio­lent con­fronta­tion with the Wob­blies where Ever­est killed one man and wounded another in self defense. I first read of it in John DosPas­sos’ book, USA, right after we’d moved to Seat­tle in 1981 and it struck me that no one talks about this, no one reads about it in his­tory books. Like the Armen­ian geno­cide, if we don’t say any­thing, maybe it will go away.

  32. Sue said on May 1st, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    Even when it’s a fairly-well-known part of his­tory, we don’t make the con­nec­tion. Lots of peo­ple are aware of the truth-based plot of Upton Sinclair’s book The Jun­gle, which was writ­ten to call atten­tion to labor abuses and instead caused an uproar about tainted food, lead­ing to reg­u­la­tions put in place dur­ing a Repub­li­can admin­is­tra­tion. Today, in part due to weak­en­ing of reg­u­la­tions, we’ve been deal­ing with tainted food issues for a few years and there has not been an equiv­a­lent uproar. And labor prac­tices in the food/ag indus­try? So much bet­ter than 100 years ago.

  33. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 1st, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    Albert Spies’ final state­ment to the court that con­victed him — “I say, if death is the penalty for pro­claim­ing truth, then I will proudly and defi­antly pay the costly price! Truth cru­ci­fied in Socrates, in Christ, in Gior­dano Bruno, in Huss, in Galileo still lives — they and oth­ers whose num­ber is legion have pre­ceded us on this path. We are ready to follow!”

    And his last words on the gal­lows — “The time will come when our silence will be more pow­er­ful than the voices you stran­gle today!”

    The Hay­mar­ket mar­tyrs and John Peter Alt­geld, the Illi­nois Gov­er­nor (maybe the last one we had worth being proud of) are some of the most inter­est­ing unknown major fig­ures of Amer­i­can his­tory. Plus Har­vey Wiley of Pur­due Uni­ver­sity, the father of the FDA as Upton Sin­clair is father of the Pure Food and Drug Act … ah, the Pro­gres­sive Era! Is it with us again, ver­sion 2.0? I’d feel bet­ter about that prospect if it wasn’t for so much of the pop­u­lar awful­ness that went along with Pro­gres­sive Era 1.0 (i.e., lynch­ing and the Klan peak­ing in 1890 – 1930).

    Too bad the old canard is wrong about the Chi­nese char­ac­ters for “cri­sis” being a com­bi­na­tion of “dan­ger” and “oppor­tu­nity.” Another case of “too good to check out.”

  34. Old Lino Operator said on May 1st, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    The Lud­low Mas­sacre (1914) when the Col­orado National Guard machine­gunned two women and eleven chil­dren. A Google search for lud­low mas­sacre is inter­est­ing read­ing just for the headings.

    On the oppo­site side of the ledger was George Jones and his Golden Rule Com­pany. The book Holy Toledo says that the day of his funeral the only peo­ple not lin­ing the funeral route were the pris­on­ers in jail.

  35. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 1st, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Lino, i think that’s the event lightly fic­tion­al­ized in Bar­bara Kingsolver’s “Ani­mal Dreams.” Another good take on untold his­tory that won’t go away.

  36. alex said on May 1st, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    I think my first glimpse of labor his­tory must have been many years ago tour­ing the restored Gless­ner house on Chicago’s South Prairie Avenue. It was built as a fortress so that it couldn’t be attacked from the street side by dis­grun­tled labor activists in the late nine­teenth cen­tury. The inte­rior was pretty amaz­ing as well. To keep the ser­vants invis­i­ble at all times, a net­work of nar­row hall­ways sur­rounded every room of the house. Even­tu­ally the Gless­ners and the Pot­ter Palmers and all the other gilded age barons moved up to Lake For­est, about a half day’s travel from Chicago at that time, out of fear of being mas­sa­cred in their homes by antic­i­pated labor uprisings.

  37. Gasman said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    Here’s one for the work­ing stiffs! (Imag­ine me rais­ing my glass of intox­i­cant now. Well, actu­ally later, as I have a rehearsal to go to.) Three cheers for unions.

    Any other union mem­bers out there? Me; Amer­i­can Fed­er­a­tion of Musi­cians, local 618.

  38. Cathy D. said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    Nina Toten­berg reads the Supreme Court tran­scripts bet­ter than the orig­i­nals pro­duce them. Only rea­son I wouldn’t want the pro­ceed­ings aired live.

  39. jeff borden said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Another inter­est­ing bit of Illinois/Chicago labor lore can be gleaned dur­ing a guided tour of the Grace­land Ceme­tery on Clark Street. Many of the most famous Chicagoans and Illi­noisans are buried there, includ­ing a local plu­to­crat who made sure his bur­ial site over­looked the place where his mis­tress would be buried.

    The most inter­est­ing story, how­ever, is about the grave of George Pull­man, the guy who built the famous Pull­man sleep­ing cars in a fac­tory sur­rounded by his own com­pany town of the same name. When he died dur­ing very vio­lent and bru­tal labor bat­tles between Pinker­tons and the work­ers, he was buried “some­where” near the huge mon­u­ment that marks his name. First, they poured con­crete into the hole, then dropped in rail­road ties, then the cas­ket, then more rail­road ties, and then more con­crete. His fam­ily feared angry union­ists would come into the ceme­tery after dark, dig up his corpse and muti­late it.

    They played for keeps in those days. I still think John Hughes’ “Mate­wan” is a pretty good primer for just how vicious were the bat­tles between man­age­ment and work­ers, even if it is a fic­tion­al­ized account.

  40. Dexter said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    Local 164, UAW, retired. I entered the ranks when Leonard Wood­cock was Inter­na­tional Pres­i­dent, then saw Doug Fraser, Owen Bieber, Stephen Yokich, and Ron Get­tlefin­ger serve at the top.
    Ron Get­tlefin­ger was our Region 3 Direc­tor for six years and he’d come to our plant some­times; a good guy, I marched with him at a Vet­er­ans Day parade in Indi­anapo­lis a cou­ple years before he became the really big cheese of the union.
    He was a chas­sis line repair­man at the Ford Louisville plant since 1964 and still prefers that title.

  41. Dexter said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    jeff bor­den: The Pull­man story is true, of course, and the the­ory worked; no ghoul­ish labor­ers ever got to his bones. By the way, the Pull­man family’s fears were well-founded, as George Pull­man was the most-hated man of that century.

    Do you know why all Pull­man porters were called “George” by train passengers?

  42. Dexter said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:47 pm

    I have a friend who is an ama­teur pho­tog and he lives not far from Grace­land Ceme­tery, which is very near Wrigley Field in Chicago.
    He recently emailed me how he likes to stroll around Grace­land for a break from city life, and he has sent won­der­ful pho­tos of the head­stones and mon­u­ments.
    The Pull­man Mon­u­ment at the grave site:

    http://​tinyurl​.com/​cztgws

  43. moe99 said on May 1st, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    Jeff B, I think Mate­wan was a John Sayles movie.

  44. jeff borden said on May 1st, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    Moe,

    Omigod. Of course. I have slurred a great artist by com­par­ing him with a hack. My embar­rass­ment knows no bounds.

    The cool thing about Sayles, as was true with John Cas­savetes, was his abil­ity to do main­stream stuff, even pop cul­ture stuff like the script for “Alli­ga­tor,” then use the pro­ceeds to make his own movies includ­ing “Matewan.”

    I’m still struck by the clas­sic line uttered in “Brother From Another Planet,” when Joe Mor­ton as the mute black alien is seated next to another black man on a sub­way train. The alien’s seat­mate notes that, in just a moment, all the white peo­ple will dis­ap­pear. The con­duc­tor announces the next stop will be 125th and Lenox in Harlem as all the white folks pile out. This is exactly what hap­pens when I take the L to Comiskey Park for a Sox game. All the white peo­ple get off at 35th Street while the black rid­ers con­tinue on to the vir­tu­ally all-black South Side.

  45. MichaelG said on May 1st, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    Between the fab­u­lous Nina T. on the radio and the ever won­der­ful Dahlia Lith­wick on Slate we have excel­lent SCOTUS coverage.

    I’m a mem­ber of a State employ­ees’ union. Pro­fes­sional Engi­neers in Cal­i­for­nia Gov­ern­ment — PECG. I’m not an engi­neer but I play one on TV. A lot of peo­ple in the union are not engi­neers. There are jobs that don’t require engi­neer­ing degrees or licenses. Stand­ing around job sites with one’s hands in one’s pock­ets is one of them.

  46. jeff borden said on May 1st, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Okay, Dex­ter, why were all the porters called George?

  47. Dexter said on May 1st, 2009 at 6:29 pm

    jeff:
    (being called George ) …it was a throw-back to slav­ery days…slaves often went by the name of their masters…“Lincoln freed the slaves, and Pull­man hired them.”

  48. LA Mary said on May 1st, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    This was on a resume we got here today:

    Major: nurs­ing
    Grade Point Aver­age: 3.8
    Degree Obtained: ass

  49. MichaelG said on May 1st, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Yeah, but what degree of ass?

  50. Deborah said on May 1st, 2009 at 8:35 pm

    I’ve been to Grace­land Cemetary, walked there and back actu­ally which is about 8 miles round trip. I love places like that. The archi­tect Louis Sul­li­van is buried there.
    Also an archi­tect friend of ours worked on the restora­tion of the Gless­ner house, Ben Weese, brother of the famous archi­tect Harry Weese.

  51. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 1st, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    Mate­wan wasn’t hardly fic­tion at all; Blair Moun­tain and Sid Hat­field and Baldwin-Felts are all true sto­ries — Sayles put very lit­tle orna­ment on the story. The sto­ries in West Vir­ginia are as close to the sur­face as a vein; not a vein of coal, but one right under the skin. Peo­ple remem­ber who bled, and who didn’t.

  52. Gena said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    AFM since my 16th birth­day when I drove the fam­ily sta­tion wagon to south St Louis to the union hall. Can still smell the cigar smoke.

  53. basset said on May 1st, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    NABET here, for a cou­ple of years in the late 70s up in Michi­gan. our local was worse than worth­less, don’t get me started…

  54. Another Mary said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    My first post here -

    Dex­ter, is it true that Ron Get­tlefin­ger is the brother of Bishop Ger­ald Get­tlefin­ger of the Evans­ville (IN) Roman Catholic dio­cese? That’s what I always heard. And, I’ve been read­ing here for a cou­ple of months. I have no idea why this is the topic of my first post.

  55. Joe Kobiela said on May 1st, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    Steel­work­ers local 903, retired
    Pilot Joe

  56. CrazyCatLady said on May 2nd, 2009 at 12:41 am

    I’ve been to Grace­land, which has a ceme­tery area where Elvis is buried, along with his Mom, Dad, Grandma and Elvis’ twin who died at birth. talk about awe­some! lol

  57. Dexter said on May 2nd, 2009 at 1:40 am

    I hope some­one of Latino descent can help me with this. Up-thread I was rant­ing about how as a kid, I was kept igno­rant of the greater mean­ing of May Day.
    Now I want to know: In Mex­ico or at least the Great Amer­i­can South­west of the USA, was Cinco de Mayo a huge party day?
    In my younger days when I never missed a party, I never attended or heard about any Cinco de Mayo parties…now it seems all the brew­eries pro­mote Cinco de Mayo as a huge beer drink­ing day.
    It’s a lim­ited regional hol­i­day in Mex­ico, is not Mex­i­can inde­pen­dence day, and com­mem­o­rates a bat­tle fought against the French a hun­dred and forty-seven years ago.
    Why was this par­tic­u­lar day and not the Sep­tem­ber cal­en­dar date which sig­ni­fies Mex­i­can inde­pen­dence been claimed as Mex­i­can party day?
    I’m just sayin’…if it is indeed so impor­tant, why had so few heard of it until rel­a­tively recently? After all, Mex­i­can Day and the parade in the Chicago Loop is still held in September.

  58. Dexter said on May 2nd, 2009 at 2:27 am

    well…lots of peo­ple remem­bered May Day, alright…
    http://​www​.nytimes​.com/​s​l​i​d​e​s​h​o​w​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​5​/​0​1​/​w​o​r​l​d​/​2​0​0​9​0​5​0​1​-​m​a​y​d​a​y​-​s​l​i​d​e​s​h​o​w​_​1​3.html

    …and it’s Friesan Fire, my pick for The Derby…spozed t’be muddy, and my horse won big in the mud last time out…pray for rain!

  59. Gasman said on May 2nd, 2009 at 4:25 am

  60. Gasman said on May 2nd, 2009 at 4:35 am

    Dr. Con­dolezza Rice has claimed, as has George Bush pre­vi­ously, that Al Qaeda is the great­est threat that the United States has ever faced. At a meet­ing with stu­dents at Roble Hall, at Stan­ford Uni­ver­sity she made that star­tling state­ment. She also asserted that we never tor­tured any­one and effec­tively admit­ted to being part of a con­spir­acy to tor­ture. I’d like to look at her claim con­cern­ing the Nazis and Al Qaeda.

    Let’s com­pare the two:

    Nazi Ger­many
     – had 18.2 mil­lion sol­diers in uni­form between 1935 – 1945
     – the com­bined mil­i­tary forces, the Wer­ma­cht, was made up of the Heer (army), the Luft­waffe (air force), the Kriegs­ma­rine (navy), and the Waffen-SS (essen­tially an armed de facto fourth branch of gov­ern­ment that answered only to top mil­i­tary com­mand)
     – con­quered most of Europe
     – had a sys­tem of over 15,000 con­cen­tra­tion camps which impris­oned Jews, Roma, Poles, Soviet pris­on­ers, homo­sex­u­als, Jehovah’s Wit­nesses, Catholic Clergy, and oth­ers they deemed unde­sir­able
     – insti­tuted a racial cleans­ing oper­a­tion designed to rid Europe of Jews, Roma, homo­sex­u­als, and oth­ers
     – mur­dered mil­lions in their infa­mous death camps
     – assem­bled what was the great­est con­cen­tra­tion of arma­ments in his­tory
     – had an actual, active nuclear weapons pro­gram
     – had an active inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic mis­sile pro­gram
     – was directly respon­si­ble for more than 16,000,000 allied mil­i­tary deaths
     – was directly respon­si­ble for more than 45,000,000 allied civil­ian deaths

    Al Qeada
     – at its pre 9/11 peak, prob­a­bly num­bered in the low thou­sands at best
     – its great­est oper­a­tional suc­cess involved util­ity knives, coor­di­nat­ing air­line sched­ules and less than two dozen thugs will­ing to com­mit sui­cide as they mur­dered 3,000 peo­ple
     – lived in caves

    I can cer­tainly see how Dr. Rice could think that Al Qaeda is a greater threat than the Nazis. They had util­ity knives! What Al Qaeda did was hor­ri­ble, but there were many bat­tles fought in WWII that had greater death tolls than 9/11.

    Her cri­te­ria for her state­ment? Al Qaeda trumps the Nazis because Hitler never attacked Amer­i­can soil. On that flimsy basis Al Qaeda is a greater threat?

    Some might think that the total num­ber of deaths might be a greater mea­sure of threat: 61,000,000 dead vs. 3,000 dead seems like a very sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence. Al Qaeda’s death toll is but 1/20,333, or 0.005% that of the Nazis.

    So, if a van load of drunken Cana­dian Toronto Maple Leaf fans gets in a van and decides to attack Detroit, they con­sti­tute a greater threat than the Nazis sim­ply by virtue of launch­ing an attack on U. S. soil, no mat­ter how lit­tle dam­age or death they cause? By exten­sion of that logic, for­eign born Sirhan Sirhan rep­re­sented a greater threat to our coun­try than did the Nazis because he killed a sin­gle Amer­i­can on U. S. soil. Dr. Rice’s con­tention is sim­ply ludicrous.

    Find a sin­gle his­to­rian any­where on the planet who will agree with her state­ment. Aside from defy­ing credulity, it is insult­ing to the men and women who waged war against Hitler and his allies.

    By the way, Dr. Rice, Hitler’s prime ally did attack Amer­i­can soil, Pearl Harbor.

    Dr. Rice is not a stu­pid woman. For her to make such an insult­ingly moronic argu­ment sig­ni­fies a level of des­per­a­tion that com­pels her to grasp at the mer­est of straws. She can­not pos­si­bly think that this argu­ment can with­stand any scrutiny.

  61. Linda said on May 2nd, 2009 at 7:39 am

    Yes, I’m union – Asso­ci­a­tion of Pub­lic Library Employ­ees, affil­i­ated with the UAW.

  62. basset said on May 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Not only Pearl Har­bor… the Japan­ese attacked Alaska in WWII as well, and occu­pied sev­eral islands for over a year:

    http://​www​.hlswilli​waw​.com/​a​l​e​u​t​i​a​n​s​/​A​l​e​u​t​i​a​n​s​/​h​t​m​l​/​a​l​e​u​t​i​a​n​s​-​w​w​ii.htm

    they also shelled the Ore­gon, and I believe the Wash­ing­ton, coast a few times from sub­marines… and released explosive-carrying bal­loons which drifted across the North­west on the wind, caus­ing the only civil­ian deaths from direct enemy action on the main­land US dur­ing the war.

  63. coozledad said on May 2nd, 2009 at 10:35 am

    The Luft­waffe was devel­op­ing a flying-wing type stealth bomber con­structed of ply­wood with car­bon adhe­sives to avoid radar detec­tion. The pay­load range, 4000 lbs, sug­gests they orig­i­nally planned to carry a fis­sion weapon, but the most they could have man­aged by the time their for­ward bases were over­run would have been a prim­i­tive dirty bomb.
    It’s the thought that counts.
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​A​m​e​r​i​k​a​_​Bomber
    http://​www​.unmu​seum​.org/​n​b​o​mb.htm

  64. Gasman said on May 2nd, 2009 at 11:06 am

    The point that I was try­ing to make was the absolute ludomi­cros­ity of Rice’s asser­tion. A his­tory savvy ele­men­tary schooler would be able to see through her implau­si­ble rationale.

    I have always thought that Dr. Rice was the smartest per­son in the Bush admin­is­tra­tion. She is now behav­ing like some­one who is not very bright. For her to put forth such an extremely tor­tured excuse (pun intended) indi­cates the depth of her des­per­a­tion. That she needs to force­fully make this case even to under­grad­u­ates is also rather pathetic.

    I also noticed that now she makes no efforts to care­fully parse her lies. She just blurts them out.

  65. del said on May 2nd, 2009 at 11:44 am

    If you repeat lies enough, Gas­man, and nobody objects, it’s truth by estop­pel, right? Thanks.

    As for Supreme Court nom­i­nees, after read­ing Bob Woodward’s book, “The Brethren,” my work­ing hypoth­e­sies is that a pres­i­dent would be wise to nom­i­nate some­one with sense of humor. They wield more clout behind closed doors than the humor­less, I think.

  66. Dexter said on May 2nd, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    Get­ting close to Put-In Day over at the marina, eh, nance?

  67. brian stouder said on May 2nd, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    True about George Pullman’s grave with the cement and steel reinforcement.

    And this impressed Pullman’s right-hand man, Robert Lin­coln, enough that in 1901 he had Pres­i­dent Lincoln’s remains sim­i­larly entombed in cement and steel — so as to pre­vent any fur­ther attempts at snatch­ing the remains of our great­est president.

  68. caliban said on May 2nd, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    Any one of those peo­ple in Nancy’s first graf would be supe­rior to the grotesque ide­alogue Scalia. A seated judge that claims to be strict con­struc­tion­ist but ignores the Fed­er­al­ist Papers on the sub­ject of the Sec­ond Amend­ment, actu­ally, any judge that held for W vs. Gore, has proven he couldn’t care less about indi­vid­ual rights and is will­ing to twist the Con­sti­tu­tion to match reac­tionary per­sonal beliefs, and the let­ter of the Constitution.

    There’s going to be an inane par­ti­san tem­pest in a teapot no mat­ter who Obama nom­i­nates. These mind­less twits should just shut up. Roberts and Alito are fel­low trav­el­ers of Repub­li­cans that don’t buy any part of the Bill of Tights other than their flawed, stran­gled inter­pre­ta­tion of the Sec­ond Amend­ment, and they’re blights on the inten­tions of the Found­ing Fathers, who under­stood they couldn’t fore­see assault weapons and gun man­u­fac­tur­ers that make semi-auto weapons and con­ver­sion kits you can buy with­out actu­ally iden­ti­fyinng yourself.

    Con­sider the dam­age by mind­less oppo­si­tion to well-qualified Obama. appointees. The fact that cor­rupt Repub­li­can Sen­a­tors like Vit­ters can hold up Sibelius Craig Fugate is out­ra­geous. James Lee Witt knew what he was doing, and W needed a loyal Bushie that was entirely incompetent.

    So no mat­ter who Obama chooses for the SC, nitwits like Boehner and our Sen­a­tor Lind­say Gra­ham (who has to be the most con­flicted bas­tard in the his­tory of the US Sen­ate, and why doesn’t Lind­say just admit these bas­tards are tor­tur­ers, he’d sleep bet­ter) will have phony reser­va­tions they claim are prin­ci­pled oppo­si­tion. Fact is, Obama is not going to nom­i­nate any­body a rea­son­able per­son could object to.

    Con­cern­ing the judi­ciary, Repub­li­cans are hyper to the point of were­wolfism about orig­i­nal intent, but they nom­i­nate plas­tic pocket pro­tec­tor tough guys like Scalia and Clarence Thomas. How does stop­ping a legit­i­mate recount coin­cide with Con­sti­tu­tional prin­ci­ples? I guess if you go duck hunt­ing with Cheney and he doesn’t blow your face off, KBR can elec­tro­cute all the sol­diers it wants and that’s just fine.

    I’d like to see these bas­tards pros­e­cuted. Every­body seems to have forg­pot­ten about Cheney’s stovepipe. SERE said the tor­ture would pro­duce false pos­i­tives. These bas­tards were try­ing to get detainees to impli­cate Sad­dam, and that is such a spec­tac­u­lar lie, it’s hard to comprehend.

    Grav­i­tat­ing back to 2004, we have the Swift-boaters. Cheney was hip-deep. Six ques­tion­able, actu­ally ridicu­lous, defer­ments, but Kerry was such an oppor­tunist he wounded him­self? Out­right slan­der. Every­thing that comes out of Cheney’s mouth is an out­right lie. There’s no way of ascer­tain­ing why he was so keen on tor­ture. It seems fairly obvi­ous he thought some­body could be made to impli­cate Sad­dam in 9/11. Every­body was sup­posed to ignore the cash this jerk made off this grotesque lie.

    So, how does the nation progress? One way or another, Cheney must be pros­e­cuted. Dis­bar every sin­gle ass­hole lawyer that had any­thing to do with this mas­sive per­jury. If there’s a path to fol­low, it’s the Stovepipe

    http://​www​.moth​er​jones​.com/​m​o​j​o​/​2​0​0​7​/​0​6​/​c​h​e​n​e​y​-​s​t​o​v​e​p​i​p​e​s​-​c​l​i​m​a​t​e​-​p​o​l​i​c​y​-​c​h​r​i​s​t​i​e​-​t​o​d​d​-​w​i​t​m​a​n​-​d​e​c​l​a​r​e​s​-​h​e​r​s​e​l​f​-​c​a​n​d​i​d​a​t​e​-​er-inn

    http://​www​.usnews​.com/​u​s​n​e​w​s​/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​0​6​0​5​2​9​/​2​9​a​d​d​i​n​g​t​on.htm

    Cheney is Mr. Inter­locu­tor for W. Cheney thought it was just fine for nuns to be raped and mur­dered in Sal­vador. There’s actu­ally no excuse for this dickhead.

    http://​www​.moth​er​jones​.com/​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​1​/​p​e​o​p​l​e​-​v​s​-​d​i​c​k​-​cheney

    He’s a pis­sant excuse for a civil ser­vant with no brains to muster but hind­brain. He fix­ated on the idea of impe­r­ial pres­i­dency, he appointed him­self VP for the most lame dum­b­ass ever appointed Pres­i­dent, and now his crim­i­nal behav­ior and greedy dis­re­gard for human life has come back to haunt his ass.

  69. Deborah said on May 2nd, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    Crazy Cat Lady,

    The Grace­land I’m refer­ring to is in Chicago, I have never been to the one where Elvis is buried, always wanted to go there though.

  70. caliban said on May 2nd, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    Elvis is fas­ci­nat­ing, and there’s no way to con­sider Elvis apart from ho weird he was. J. Edgar? Far as music is con­cerned, spec­tac­u­lar out of the gate, bloated and sac­carine later. But “Sus­pi­cious Minds”, that’s bril­liant. “In th Gnetto” is pretty good.

    If Steve Stills had just made “For What It’s Worth” and stroked out on the crap­per He’s an icon and Neil’s buddy. Any­body knows the his­tory of these guys knows both played best when they played off each other.

    So what did y’all thingk about Time’s most influ­en­tial? Rush? Apoth­e­o­sized by Glen Beck? Small num­ber of peo­ple that claim some con­nec­tion with san­ity, That pompous wind­bag Bono, that never met sny­thing he couldn’t steal from the Alarm?

  71. basset said on May 2nd, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    »The Luft­waffe was devel­op­ing a flying-wing type stealth bomber con­structed of ply­wood with car­bon adhe­sives to avoid radar detection.

    they devel­oped, and actu­ally flew against US bombers a very few times, a jet inter­cep­tor made largely of ply­wood… because they couldn’t get enough metal. this is a Wikipedia entry, but it appears to be accurate:

    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​H​e​i​n​k​e​l​_​He_162

    Grace­land… we stopped there in 1981 on a hon­ey­moon trip to New Orleans and sent post­cards home signed “Elvis and Priscilla.”

  72. brian stouder said on May 2nd, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    Here’s a rock­band for y’all

    http://​scrap​soflife​-pam​.blogspot​.com/

  73. coozledad said on May 2nd, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    bas­set: I was always stunned how many pilots the Ger­mans got for the Messer­schmitt Komet pro­gram, despite the prob­lems with rup­tured hydro­gen per­ox­ide hoses liq­ue­fy­ing pilots on a bad day, and the spinal injuries most pilots suf­fered on a suc­cess­ful skid land­ing. It must really suck to be tech­no­log­i­cally advanced losers.

  74. caliban said on May 2nd, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    When I was in JSchool at the Grady School, there was a room where we could read the Sacbee and the Mer­cury, and the Boston Globe, the Chris­t­ian Sci­ence Mon­i­tor, Louisville Courier-Journal, and other papers that actu­ally meant some­thing and car­ried edi­to­r­ial weight.

    Do peo­ple believe Twit­ter is news? Or think­ing? I’m on board with tech­nol­ogy, but if it’s going to mean everybody’s stu­pid, I’ll walk out into the Atlantic. Albert Ein­stein was only half as smart as Oppen­heimer. Ein­stein said

    Two things are infi­nite: the uni­verse and human stu­pid­ity; and I’m not sure about the universe.

    Rely­ing on the net and let­ting news­pa­pers die is proof. The net is 99 and 44/100 blath­er­ham­mers. Ein­stein also said

    A knowl­edge of the exis­tence of some­thing we can­not pen­e­trate, of the man­i­fes­ta­tions of the pro­found­est rea­son and the most radi­ant beauty — it is this knowl­edge and this emo­tion that con­sti­tute the truly reli­gious atti­tude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply reli­gious man.

    Thomas Jef­fer­son said

    Ques­tion with bold­ness even the exis­tence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of rea­son than that of blind­folded fear.

    And so, Teill­hard said Joy is the most infal­li­ble sign of the pres­ence of God.

    Joy is dis­cov­er­ing intel­libence and com­pas­sion where you thought it couldn’t pos­si­bly exist.

  75. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2009 at 12:20 am

    Jack Kemp, RIP.

    What­ever the Repub­li­can party ever was, or ever will be, he was the best of them; he can­not be replaced.

    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​3​0​5​40404/

    “Pro foot­ball gave me a good per­spec­tive,” he was quoted as say­ing. “When I entered the polit­i­cal arena, I had already been booed, cheered, cut, sold, traded, and hung in effigy.”

    PS — finally watched “No Coun­try for Old Men” tonight. Maybe it just hit me wrong, or maybe I just have no stom­ache for such movies; indeed, it’s no movie for an old guy

  76. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 3rd, 2009 at 7:51 am

    Thanks, Brian. I loved that guy.

    Did you get the impres­sion that the miss­ing part of the movie was that Chi­urgh came into room where the sher­iff was, flipped his coin, and left him alive … and he just can’t face that?

  77. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2009 at 10:45 am

    Jeff — well I gotta admit, THAT hadn’t occurred to me! The coin, as fate-decider and all-purpose screw dri­ver, DID remind me of Batman’s neme­sis, although in Bat­man we get to see what drove the coin-flipping maniac over the edge.

    The other movie that NCFOM rips off (in a major, major way) is Arnold Schwarzenegger’s orig­nal (1984) Ter­mi­na­tor –which inter­est­ingly was made back near the time that NCFOM is set…I sup­pose the Coen broth­ers would affect a Texas accent and say this is an “Oh-mahzhhhh”.

    But Arnold’s cryp­tic, unstop­pable and remorse­less killing machine — with an intrigu­ing for­eign accent — has the intrin­sic inno­cence (and rai­son d’être) of actu­ally BEING a machine; whereas NCFOM’s cryp­tic, unstop­pable and remorse­less killing machine — with an intrigu­ing for­eign accent — seems to be a free-floating men­ace with no begin­ning nor end. (and by the way — what sort of bad-guy boss is bad enough and resource­ful enough to hire killers, such as the psy­cho and then Woody Har­rel­son, but NOT bad enough and resource­ful enough to have ANY secu­rity, at ALL, back at his headquarters?)

    Bleh

  78. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 3rd, 2009 at 11:50 am

    Brian — just picked this up off Twit­ter from Scott Simon of NPR, and again, i loved Jack Kemp: http://​tinyurl​.com/​d25btr

    And i real­ize the part of Joe Biden i like is the part that reminds me of Kemp (may that part flourish!).

  79. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    Jeff — Thanks for that link; a truly mar­velous article.

    Jack Kemp was the first national politi­cian that I really, truly admired. It all seemed so clear for a shin­ing moment, back there in the ate ’80’s. The Rea­gan admin­is­tra­tion had sur­vived its sec­ond term scan­dal, and GHWB was going to run and win, and he’d pick Kemp for his VP, and finally — Jack Kemp would be the GOP’s vision­ary activist pres­i­dent some­where in the late ’90’s.….but GHWB didn’t see it that way, and we got pos­tur­ing instead of belief from the GOP, and the Democ­rats (improb­a­bly enough!) have all the ideas and the deep bench and the great president!

    My, oh my

  80. Dexter said on May 3rd, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Jeff..it was the gas sta­tion man, not the sheriff…he wasted that deputy at the out­set of the movie…STARZ showed this movie a hun­dred times and I have watched it may thirty times, a lit­tle here, a lit­tle there, in full maybe a half dozen times.
    “It’s your lucky day…don’t put that quar­ter in your pocket, then it would become just another quar­ter, which it is.” Make any sense to you?
    Chig­urh was one nasty hom­bre. “Hello Car­son, let’s go to your room.” Uh-oh.

  81. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 3rd, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Dex, i mean when the sher­iff was in the one hotel room, and it doesn’t seem pos­si­ble that Chi­urgh missed him, and there’s the clos­ing mono­logue from Tommy Lee — it made me think that, shar­ing the sheriff’s pov, we’ve had that moment edited out, and it’s what we/he can’t face — that there are moments when even some­one like him can do noth­ing, except wait for jus­tice to fall in its own way, someday.

  82. LA Mary said on May 3rd, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    Cinco de Mayo is not the same as Mex­i­can Inde­pen­dence day and it’s a big deal here in LA. I under­stand it’s not that big a deal in Mex­ico. It cel­e­brates a bat­tle won over French forces.

  83. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    “Hello Car­son, let’s go to your room.” Uh-oh.

    Another stu­pid scene. Why would a sharp bounty hunter like Woody Harrelson’s char­ac­ter — who could find Josh Brolin (the cow­boy) within three hours — allow the psy­cho to escort him from a crowded lobby to the cer­tain death of a pri­vate room?

    Bleh!

  84. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 3rd, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    OK, so when some­one eight, nine years older than me says “time for us old peo­ple to get out of the way of the bright young folk com­ing up” — http://​www​.newsweek​.com/​i​d​/​195657 — i can’t help but want to reply “you’re gonna have to come and get me, ya dirty copper!”

    So it’s a dated ref­er­ence, but i meant it iron­i­cally. Or are we post-irony now?

  85. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2009 at 10:22 pm

    Say Jeff, this pas­sage, about Andrew Mellon’s grand­fa­ther Thomas Mel­lon, made me think of you when I read it ear­lier today in the book “Mel­lon” (sub­ti­tled “An Amer­i­can Life”) by David Can­na­dine (and co-starring Dorothy’s Pitts­burgh) (from page 14)

    He con­tin­ued to work on the fam­ily farm for two more years, gain­ing first­hand knowl­edge of con­struc­tion work by build­ing houses and barns, and all the while brood­ing on how best he might set about acquir­ing that “knowl­edge and wealth and dis­tinc­tion” on which he was now so deter­minedly set. “Knowl­edge” would clearly come first, and in his lim­ited spare time, he read yet more widely and acquired the rudi­ments of Latin. In 1832 he enrolled at the Rev. Jonathon Gill’s Tran­quil Retreat Acad­emy near Mon­roeville in Allegheny County to pre­pare for col­lege. Dur­ing the next two years, he mas­tered Murray’s Latin gram­mar, learn­ing all seventy-six rules of syn­tax by heart; he read Ceasar, Vir­gil, and Ovid; and he made a good start at Greek. As he would later recall, with more pride than self pity„ he was “pur­su­ing a course of clas­si­cal study under dif­fi­cul­ties.” This was partly because Gill was more than a touch eccen­tric — he was con­fi­dent that the world would end in 1837 — and partly because Thomas was still work­ing for his par­ents, who in 1833 moved from Poverty Point to a new and big­ger farm at Mon­roeville.

    Any­way — it made me chuckle! And if the col­or­ful 19th cen­tury Rev. Gill of West­ern PA is any rela­tion, it just goes to show that it’s a small world

  86. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 3rd, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    “This was partly because Gill was more than a touch eccentric…”

    You just made my week, and it’s only Sun­day night. My Gills were in the Pitts­burgh area, but fled fed­eral war­rants (i’m so proud) after 1794 to the hin­ter­lands of Clearfield County, due to some unpleas­ant­ness over whiskey and rebel­lious­ness. So it would seem pos­si­ble that they were related in some way, but i’ve got no Jonathan’s in my genealog­i­cal data­base, let alone clergy … i’m the first one in the fam­ily to add that offense to our proudly eccen­tric line (our fore­bearer came over to fight in the British Army, deserted at Saratoga and then joined the Con­ti­nen­tals in time to spend the win­ter of 1777 at Val­ley Forge).

    But i’ll have to check up on Rev. Jonathan; gra­zie, Brian!

  87. Dexter said on May 4th, 2009 at 2:06 am

    Well, fel­las, it was on again Sun­day night … I watched a bit of it, and of course what threw me was Jeff’s refer­ral of Woody (Car­son) as a sher­iff, when he was a sort-of bounty hunter, as brian ref­er­ences above.
    A theme was indeed “ya can’t stop what’s comin’ ” as well as the beer-drinking woman who was try­ing to bed Lewelyn…Lewelyn says he he’s just look­ing for what’s com­ing next, and the woman says “yeah, but ya never see that comin’ ”

  88. Elaine said on May 4th, 2009 at 8:31 am

  89. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on May 4th, 2009 at 8:36 am

    Nope, i’m talk­ing about the sher­iff, and his despair at the end, and the mys­tery of how he sur­vived “almost” being found by Chig­urh. I’m won­der­ing if the point is that, unde­picted in the movie, in a sequence that is mostly the pov of Jones’ char­ac­ter, is Chig­urh find­ing him, hav­ing him weapon­less, flip­ping the cursed coin, and not killing him based on the out­come — leav­ing him to live, but hav­ing trou­ble com­ing to terms with the ran­dom­ness of that fact.

    And not able, even, to say or recall how it is that he sur­vived. It would be awful and well nigh impos­si­ble for a man like him to admit he was faced with a sit­u­a­tion like that and could do noth­ing, other than stand there.

    It’s a thought, any­how. But has noth­ing to do with dead meat Woody.

  90. brian stouder said on May 4th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Dex, it blew right past me — until you pointed it out — that indeed the sexy woman by the pool said “yeah, but ya never see that comin’“ (I was busy pon­der­ing the temp­ta­tion that Luellen had deftly skirted) — and of course she ends up a floater.

    But Woody clearly ‘saw it comin’, or should have — since he was the one guy in the whole movie who had any con­cept of what Anton was…yet the movie mak­ers have him leave a pub­lic space (where Woody has some small chance — judg­ing by the trailer park lady who was saved by the toi­let flush) and go to a pri­vate room, where there is no chance at all.

    After sim­mer­ing for the past two days, I think the source of my anger at the movie is the way we (the audi­ence) are lead into (what we will only in hind­sight rec­og­nize as) a slaugh­ter house, and intro­duced to many char­ac­ters that we like and will root for, and then sub­jected to their slaughter.

    Bleh!

  91. nancy said on May 4th, 2009 at 9:22 am

    You’re blam­ing an awful lot on the Coens, Brian. That movie is an almost page-for-page-faithful adap­ta­tion of the Cor­mac McCarthy novel, and trust me, he doesn’t rip off Ter­mi­na­tor movies in search of plot twists. I think he was play­ing vari­a­tions on the theme of Evil And Its Inevitabil­ity, per­son­ally, as that’s one that runs through all of his work that I’ve read, which is not a lot — he’s really not my grim cuppa tea. “The Road” was the one that made me put him aside once and for all. That movie is com­ing this fall, and will make “No Coun­try” look like musi­cal com­edy, I’ll bet.

    (Just look at the char­ac­ter names: Baby Eater, Well-Fed Can­ni­bal, Amputee Man #1 in Cel­lar, etc. I smell a Christ­mas movie!)

  92. brian stouder said on May 4th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    Good point about Ter­mi­na­tor; hell, Ahnuld (wasn’t that a Cameron movie?) prob­a­bly ripped off McCarthy, come to think of it!

    The nihilism (lit­er­ally point­less, for most of the mur­der vic­tims) is strik­ingly sim­i­lar in both movies.

    Here’s a par­lor game ques­tion that occurred to me: leave aside the all the dead guys (but includ­ing the two suits that Anton kills there) at the desert site that Luellen finds — how many peo­ple get killed in the movie?

    I’m think­ing the body count is north of 12, with sev­eral shown in excru­ci­at­ing detail.

    Excru­ci­at­ing enough that if the Coen broth­ers make the movie with “baby eater” in it, I’ll be sure to skip it!

  93. LA Mary said on May 4th, 2009 at 11:11 am

    Blood Merid­ian is a tough read by McCarthy. A good book though. I like his stuff. The Cross­ing is a favorite.

  94. brian stouder said on May 4th, 2009 at 12:04 pm

    Mary, in my opin­ion this relent­less, remorse­less movie (or book) vio­lence is like movie (or print) pornog­ra­phy. If the movie mak­ers (or pub­lish­ers) expend all their crafti­ness on immers­ing us in the expe­ri­ence itself, and not the ram­i­fi­ca­tions and con­se­quences and the right and the wrong; if it is devoid of any rec­og­nize­able human­ity — then the whole effort strikes me as sim­ply a pruri­ent appeal to — what? — the sav­age within us?

    Given the choice between vio­lence for its own sake, or reprod­c­u­tive activ­ity (for exam­ple) for its own sake, I pre­fer naked brunettes wildly over-acting their orgasms as some mys­te­ri­ous and unstop­pable fel­low with a funny hair­cut and an odd tool goes tire­lessly about his work (and even THAT gets old very quickly, but we digress!)

  95. LA Mary said on May 4th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    I agree, Brian, but I think Cor­mac McCarthy does deal with consequences.