nancynall.com » A walk in the woods.

A walk in the woods.

isleroyale1991.2

Some­times I think the rea­son so much fuss is made over places like Pic­tured Rocks and Sleep­ing Bear Dunes is because they’re parts of the Great Lakes shore­line that look dif­fer­ent from all the other parts. Kid­ding. But all of my northern-Michigan pic­tures fea­ture the same low line of conifers on the hori­zon, like they’re fol­low­ing me around.

The back­packs are the tell in this week’s Embar­rass­ing Pho­tos — that’s Isle Royale, August 1991. Ten days or so in the back­coun­try in north­ern Lake Supe­rior, one of the pret­ti­est and least-visited National Parks in the coun­try. Saw: Moose, pileated wood­peck­ers, mis­cel­la­neous eagles, a snake swal­low­ing a toad, a load of canine poop shot through with hair, which is about as close to one of the island’s wolves as one should ever get. Heard: Loons, the wind whip­ping across a series of cor­duroy ridges like ocean waves. Did not hear: Inter­nal com­bus­tion engines. Allowed: Nerves to relax, leg hair to grow. The shower when we came out of the coun­try was one of the best of my life. The rest was unset­tling, to learn that while we’d been gone there’d been riot­ing between blacks and Jews in Crown Heights, a coup in the Soviet Union and a tree that fell on J.C. and Sam’s house, nearly cut­ting it in two.

It sort of made us want to turn around and go back in.

[Pause.] Well, “error estab­lish­ing data­base con­nec­tion” just ate the bot­tom half of this post. I’m tak­ing that as a sign that it was worth­less and weak and start­ing my Fri­day chores on sched­ule, instead of try­ing to recre­ate it. Blog­gage? Sure:

Roy dis­poses of the Andrew Sullivan-led Twit­ter rev­o­lu­tion, plus a video. (I actu­ally own that record. Even as a cal­low youth, I won­dered if any­one had actu­ally asked seven-eighths of these peo­ple to even play Sun City, so they could refuse.)

Well, now we know why her husband’s staff code-named her “Ghetto:” Mon­ica Cony­ers can be bought with a pawn-shop shop­ping spree. Allegedly. In fair­ness, she also has more upmar­ket tastes.

And with that, another half-assed effort limps to a close! A few more like this and I may beat this blog­ging jones after all.

50 responses to
“A walk in the woods.”

  1. mark said on June 19th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    Aaahh, camp­ing! An activ­ity that was edu­ca­tional and some­what enter­tain­ing when I was a child. Tol­er­a­ble, later, with friends and mood alter­ing substances.

    If a group of pop­u­lar musi­cians couldn’t change the world with a song, there is cer­tainly no rea­son for the leader of the free world to firmly con­demn the actions of Iran. Waste of breath. Our new leader will solve prob­lems with the per­sua­sive force of his per­son­al­ity and intel­lect, unbur­dened by divi­sive and sim­plis­tic notions of “Amer­i­can val­ues.” As the Supreme Leader just pointed out, how dare Amer­ica med­dle in Iran with Waco, Texas in our own his­tory? More beams for Obama to remove before talk­ing about the other guy’s mote.

  2. ROgirl said on June 19th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    The last time Ira­ni­ans took to the streets to protest a cor­rupt, oppres­sive regime they paved the way for … a cor­rupt, oppres­sive regime. Maybe things will change this time around, but it’s hard to believe a lot of peo­ple believe that.

  3. Sue said on June 19th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    I was never an enthu­si­as­tic camper, but I tried to be a good sport about it, even the wilder­ness stuff. That came to a stop after the kids arrived and I real­ized that I got to do the exact same stuff I did at home with­out the ben­e­fit of closely-available hot water and large magic boxes with knobs and but­tons that heat and cool and wash and dry things. Did you know that small humans are built very close to the ground so that all that dirt does not have to travel as far?

  4. Jen said on June 19th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Can you believe I’ve never actu­ally been camp­ing? My family’s idea of “rough­ing it” is a Hol­i­day Inn Express. My husband’s fam­ily, on the other hand, loves camp­ing. I got out of it last sum­mer because my hus­band had to work every week­end, but I think I might have to go this sum­mer. I told him I’d try it. I don’t know, though — I like the out­doors, and hik­ing, and all that, but I’m not sure I really want to sleep on the ground in a tent. Couldn’t I do all the out­door stuff, then stay in a hotel at night?

    As come­dian Jim Gaffi­gan said: “If camp­ing is so great, why are all the bugs try­ing to get in my house?”

  5. coozledad said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    Mark: Per­haps we should sim­ply bomb the lot of them, as McCain blithely sug­gested. I often wish other coun­tries had med­dled in our own stolen elec­tion, but the­o­ret­i­cally it would have united us behind pres­i­dent Short­bus, or, more likely, in front of him. Since when can Repub­li­cans even dis­cuss the neces­sity of count­ing the votes, when democ­racy is anath­ema to them.
    Seems to me the mul­lahs are going to be the only peo­ple will­ing to cite Bush v. Gore as a pat­tern for elec­tion man­age­ment. All them peo­ple wan­tin’ votes counted they’re just a tram­plin on poor old Achmedinajad’s free­dom. And them pro­test­ers over there needs to find ‘em a job, don’t they, Billy Bob?

    Your folks ought to cut the mul­lahs a check: they’ve given future Repub­li­can elec­tion­eers a new tac­tic– Just destroy the votes! Then have the Supreme Court-er, aya­tol­lah call the elec­tion for the autocrats.

  6. paddyo' said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    Since you men­tioned a cou­pla national park sites, Nance, I’ll just throw in a shame­less plug here for my post-newspaper-career employer (14 months and count­ing) and note that this is a “fee-free” week­end in all 391 national parks, mon­u­ments, lakeshores, his­tor­i­cal parks, etc., etc. Free admis­sion through the entry gate (although camp­ground fees are not included).
    It’s the first of three such week­ends this sum­mer. Read all about it at:
    http://​www​.nps​.gov/​f​i​n​d​a​p​a​r​k​/​f​e​e​f​r​e​e​p​a​r​ks.htm

  7. Sue said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:16 pm

    From yesterday’s com­ments:
    Deb, I’m a trans­planted Flat­lander, so accord­ing to Wisconsin’s con­sti­tu­tion, I can never, ever be a Wis­con­si­nite, even if I have a Place Up North and know my way around a deep-fried cheese curd. But it’s a won­der­ful state and a great place to raise kids.

  8. Jeff Borden said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    What, exactly, are Amer­i­can val­ues? I must be a quart low on ‘em because I dis­like the vast major­ity of peo­ple who evoke them. Then again, I live in Chicago, so I’m not allowed to be a “real Amer­i­can” as defined by the Ora­cle of Wasilla and her followers.

    Cooz makes a great point about the neo­cons. They never saw a prob­lem they didn’t want to nuke. Being lec­tured on the proper response to the sit­u­a­tion in Iran by Paul Wol­fowitz, Charles Krautham­mer, Bill Kris­tol, etc. –men of such epic fail I can­not remem­ber the last time any of them was cor­rect about any­thing– is rich. Two weeks ago, they’d have been happy to see mis­siles and bombs rain­ing down on Tehran and killing the very peo­ple they now lion­ize for march­ing in the streets. Now, Obama is a pussy for not get­ting per­son­ally involved.

    A pox on all the chick­en­hawk neo­cons. They’ve writ­ten a chap­ter of Amer­i­can his­tory with the blood of oth­ers. May they all rot in hell…if it exists.

  9. Connie said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    Long ago on my 40th birth­day I announced I would no longer sleep on the ground. Never occurred to my guy to buy me an air mat­tress, he just went camp­ing with the kid.

    Pad­dyo, I rushed to your link to see if one of the free week­ends would coin­cide with my last week in July at Sleep­ing Bear. No such luck. And I am always happy to pay my $10.

    Sue are you there in August again?

    This has been a most stress­ful year at work, (prop­erty tax reform and unem­ploy­ment overload)and I am ready for some peace and relax­ation at the beach. Espe­cially since I hear there has been a new stairs built to my for­mer favorite beach, which I had to quit vis­it­ing a few years ago due to bluff ero­sion. I was not up to rap­pel­ing to get there.

  10. beb said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:31 pm

    I won­der, if the camer­man had turned around, would we have seen all the snow that was in last week’s picture?

    About the only camp­ing I remem­ber was when m par­ents took the fam­ily on a two week tour of the East. We stayed in tents each night until we arrived at friends and fam­ily we could crash at. When you’re ten, rough­ing it is not so back. It’re when you real­ize that ele­phants can get up off the grond veasier than I can that the idea of camp was firmly snuffed out. Also, I’m not big on the idea that a toliet is a hole behind some trees.

    Pawn­store jew­elry? Man, that woman is low rent!

    And the Wash­ing­ton Post, in an effort to “improve its busi­ness model” (cough! cough!) has has fried Dan Froomkin, prob­a­bly the only reporter to give Obama as much pain as he gave Bush. How­ever he appar­ently had a spat with right-wing crazy Charles Krautham­mer last week over tor­ture. Appar­ently, like Lim­baugh, Krautham­mer is an intouchable.

  11. LAMary said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

  12. 4dbirds said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    Meh. I was in the army. Enough camp­ing to last a lifetime.

  13. Sue said on June 19th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    Con­nie — yes I will be there in August. For my com­puter back­ground, I have a photo of the beach as seen from our rental, so every day I can look at late-afternoon sun­shine and shade on Glen Lake. What beach do you go to? And have you heard how the con­struc­tion is going on the road at the Nar­rows?
    And… how’s the cam­paign going to get Brian Stouder to join the Glen Lake/Sleeping Bear Dunes club?
    LAMary, as always, Gawker com­menters deliver: “Why is there a stream of urine pour­ing from that gin­ger­bread house?”

  14. LAMary said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

  15. Jolene said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Nance, I’m curi­ous. What’s your beef w/ Andrew Sullivan?

  16. James said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    Coo­zledad:

    Great minds think alike.

    I wrote and drew this yesterday.

  17. coozledad said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    Sue: Kinkaid is a well known pub­lic uri­na­tor. The iconic ele­ments of that paint­ing are knit tightly with its nar­ra­tive struc­ture. The mas­ter has just returned to work rip­ping his daughter’s Dis­ney posters off the wall of her play­house (which he’s expro­pri­ated as stu­dio space), in yet another fit of anti-Walt pique.
    Sweat­ing pro­fusely in the heat of numer­ous halo­gen work­lights, he pauses occa­sion­aly to knock back a swig of Green-Label Jack Daniels and scream bit­terly “I AM the king of happy paint­ings. I am the mas­ter of light!” Before he crum­ples from dehy­dra­tion in a pud­dle of his own urine, which leaks out over his yard and onto the side­walks of Carmel, CA.

  18. ROgirl said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    A lot of chim­neys for such a small cot­tage. Very odd look­ing too, with their streams of smoke going straight up — rather phal­lic. Another com­menter goes into his drunken antics at sign­ings and at Dis­ney­land. Hilarious.

    Appar­ently Henry Kissinger has said that Obama is tak­ing the right approach towards Iran. Has Rush drummed his ass out of the party already?

  19. Jolene said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    Whew! LAMary, you might want to check out TinyURL: http://​tinyurl​.com/

    Thanks, though, for the link to Ver­meer. Light, indeed. See also Edward Hop­per.

  20. LAMary said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    The roof looks like it’s cov­ered with fur.

  21. coozledad said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    James: Yup. A com­menter over at Roy’s made a good point: Achmedinajad’s base is made up of rurals, fun­da­men­tal­ists, mil­i­tary hard lin­ers, oil-wealthy for­mer Pas­daran. What’s a Repub­li­can not to love?
    I’m afraid it’ll wind up like Tia­nen­men Square. They’ll call the douchebags in from the sticks to do the killing.
    By the way– excel­lent work. My art teacher used to tell me I had the mak­ings of a painter, except for the abject lack of draw­ing skills.

  22. Connie said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    Sue, based on where I think you stay you may have our cot­tage in that pic. We are just a few doors east of the old Dairy Bar next to Shady Shores. And I hear the nar­rows bridge will be closed all sum­mer, which means any trips to Glen Arbor for us will involve dri­ving around a Glen Lake. Most likely Lit­tle Glen.

    The new stairs is at the Lane Rd. dead end on Pyra­mid Point. I still have an entire bag of petoskey stones found there one day with my mother and my aunt. (My mom died 18 years ago, and it would have been many years before that.) It was always the best rock hunt­ing beach.

  23. Danny said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    You know, Mark, though I con­sider myself con­ser­v­a­tive in many ways, I’m still hold­ing out hope for Pres­i­dent Obama. I think he needs at least 6 – 18 months before we can start to get a sense of his contributions.

    I lis­ten crit­i­cally and in great mod­er­a­tion to any right-leaning talk­ing heads. A week or so ago, I heard some­one dis­cussing how Pres­i­dent O was post-American and that he did not sub­scribe to the “Doc­trine of Amer­i­can Excep­tion­al­ism” … and I thought, “So what?” I remem­ber when Pres­i­dent Bush (then Gov­er­nor) dur­ing a debate with VP Gore explained how he thought Amer­ica needed to be more mod­est in it’s approach to the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity and that we should eschew “nation build­ing.” When I heard that, it made sense. Of course, that went out the win­dow (at least to some extent, nec­es­sar­ily, I would argue) after 9/11, but I think it is still a wor­thy stance.

    I’m all for Amer­ica being excep­tional by being a model of mod­esty and ret­i­cence. Let our great­ness be our intel­li­gence, com­pas­sion and meek­ness, not our words and saber-rattling. Let other nations sing our praise or not. Other nations can some­times fig­ure things out for them­selves too, right? Less of our gov­ern­ment inter­ven­tion in other nations gov­ern­ing seems a pretty con­ser­v­a­tive idea to me.

    Although I don’t agree with some of his moves thus far (e.g. spend­ing), right now, the biggest prob­lem for Pres­i­dent O (some­what iron­i­cally) is the fact that he has a very com­plicit, lap-dog Press. Peo­ple know this and are not going to like this for very much longer.

  24. Jolene said on June 19th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Couldn’t one of you nice peo­ple from Indi­ana do some­thing to bring an end to the career of Mike Pence? Maybe get him a post as the over­seer of all farm­ers’ mar­kets in the state – not that I’d want to inflict him on the farm­ers. He is as stu­pid as a stick, and, for some rea­son, the TV peo­ple are always ask­ing him what he thinks.

  25. jeff borden said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Danny,

    Well-said. No, bril­liantly said. I agree with every syllable.

  26. paddyo' said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    One more out­doors note, campers:
    Sun­day, besides being the Sum­mer Sol­stice, also is National Naked Hiker Day, or Naking Hik­ing Day, depend­ing on local par­lance:
    http://​www​.google​.com/​h​o​s​t​e​d​n​e​w​s​/​a​p​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​A​L​e​q​M​5​g​R​I​P​y​s​H​R​X​m​A​M​O​N​v​k​h​Y​E​D​o​S​d​6​t​z​T​A​D​9​8​TMG6G6

    There’s already some buzz about what National Park Ser­vice rangers may encounter out there dur­ing this free week­end.
    Need­less to say, use sunscreen …

  27. Rana said on June 19th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    Jolene, alas. Pence seems freak­ishly well-ensconced.

    I would argue that he’s more stu­pid than a stick, judg­ing by the let­ters his office sends back to me. His belief that we can drill our way to energy inde­pen­dence is par­tic­u­larly obdu­rate and ludicrous.

  28. 4dbirds said on June 19th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    OMG he’s paint­ing Nascar scenes now. http://​www​.thomaskinkade​.com/​m​a​g​i​/​s​e​r​v​l​e​t​/​c​o​m​.​a​s​u​c​o​n​.​e​b​i​z​.​c​a​t​a​l​o​g​.​w​e​b​.​t​k​.​C​a​t​a​l​o​g​S​e​r​v​l​e​t​?​c​a​t​a​l​o​g​A​c​t​i​o​n​=​P​r​o​d​u​c​t​&​a​m​p​;​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​I​d​=​2​0​6​3​2​5​&​a​m​p​;​m​e​n​uNdx=0

    This past week­end, I was in Atlantic City play­ing in a poker tour­na­ment at the Bor­gata when Paris Hilton showed up for a club date. She gets paid hahuge bucks for these appear­ances. I wish I could turn back the clock say to my 16 year old self “Self you need to go into the schlocky paint­ing pro­fes­sion or the go to par­ties pro­fes­sion because that’s where the money is”.

  29. ROgirl said on June 19th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    He’s the next Leroy Neiman.

  30. Catherine said on June 19th, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    I’m a lit­tle con­cerned that a Ver­meer link can co-exist on a thread with a Thomas Kinkade link. And on a site with at least one Cezanne link (loved that, LAMary).

    And just to pull together months worth of com­ments, else­where I saw TK referred to as “The Painter of Shite.”

  31. Dexter said on June 19th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Noth­ing looks so out of place and lone­some as Mighty Mac from the road around Mack­inac Island as you pedal along.
    And if you long for the conifers, take a drive up to New­berry, and drive some stretches on routes 28, 2, 123 in the U.P. —seem­ingly never-ending des­o­la­tion and pine trees.

  32. Sue said on June 19th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

  33. LAMary said on June 19th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

    How does TK work Jesus imagery into his NASCAR scenes? Oh, come to think of it, it’s prob­a­bly pretty easy and works per­fectly for his demographic.

  34. mark said on June 19th, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    danny,

    I haven’t given up hope on Obama on for­eign pol­icy, though the early signs aren’t encour­ag­ing to me. I’m not sure they have fig­ured out what to do yet, in which case doing lit­tle is fairly wise until you sort things out.

    I’m not crit­i­cal of Obama’s response to the Iran­ian elec­tions and after­math because I don’t have the infor­ma­tion to under­stand his approach. The tepid response could be fully con­sis­tent with the “real­ists” approach, but I don’t see the Obama peo­ple as dis­ci­ples of Mor­gen­thau. Maybe Clin­ton. If, for rea­sons we wouldn’t nec­es­sar­ily be privy to, the Admin­is­tra­tion thinks it can make short term progress on the nuclear issue with the cur­rent regime, it’s prob­a­bly wise not to rock the boat over less imme­di­ate concerns.

    My impres­sion, though, is that Obama over­es­ti­mates the extent to which events are dri­ven by personalities.

  35. mark said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    danny (part 2)

    And I guess I’m not as much of a rel­a­tivist when it comes to Amer­ica. Com­pared to almost all other coun­tries, we are the “shin­ing city on a hill,” and the hand­ful that com­pete mostly ben­e­fit from our dis­pro­por­tion­ate shoul­der­ing of col­lec­tive bur­dens or responsibilities.

    Fol­low­ing the col­lapse of the Soviet Union, it was very easy to think that we could take a breather and no longer com­pete with the same vigor either for influ­ence or to pro­mote democ­racy. While oth­ers might con­tinue to suf­fer in the var­i­ous hell­holes of the world, our lives would be rel­a­tively unthreatened.

    The unap­pre­ci­ated rise of rad­i­cal islam and the pre­dictable spread of and improve­ments upon tech­nolo­gies of destruc­tion may have changed things. Regard­less of how or why we got into Iraq, the exper­i­ment now is whether a democ­racy can grow in the mid­dle east, whether it spreads, and whether it derad­i­cal­izes (if there is such a word) the region.

    Liv­ing in the US and liv­ing under the mul­lahs of Iran are not, IMO, two equally weighted sides of the same coin.

  36. moe99 said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:20 pm

    I’m cer­tainly not inter­ested in con­tin­u­ing to pay for the deba­cle in Iraq except via repa­ra­tions to those who have been harmed by our unjus­ti­fied and unpro­voked attack on that country.

    Get over it. We are not the world’s nurse­maid or patrol cop. Once we get our own act together, then let’s talk about the rest of the world. But we’ve got more domes­tic prob­lems than we can shake a stick at, and unless there is some coun­try out there who is in imme­di­ate dan­ger of attack­ing us, we do not have a decent jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for fur­ther aggres­sive action.

  37. jeff borden said on June 19th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    Mark,

    When I think of the lost oppor­tu­ni­ties in the wake of 9/11, I almost weep. The civ­i­lized world was united in its sup­port of the U.S. and its revul­sion at the cow­ardly attacks while the wreck­age still smol­dered. The oppor­tu­nity was there for a sus­tained, global approach to the issue of ter­ror­ism in gen­eral and rad­i­cal Islam in particular.

    And our con­ser­v­a­tive lead­ers blew it. They blew it big time…like los­ing your house on a coin flip. What’s most galling was the absolute incom­pe­tence melded with the preen­ing arro­gance of the chick­en­hawk cheer­lead­ers, who con­tinue to shirk respon­si­bil­ity for the enor­mous cost of blood, trea­sure and pres­tige for which they alone are responsible.

    They believed they would show the world how big and tough and impe­ri­ous we were. Instead, they proved just the oppo­site. Our nation is weaker and poorer by far than it was when they took over. They’re bas­tards. They deserve seri­ous jail time, but at the very least, they should be shunned by their fel­low countrymen.

  38. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 19th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    Yeah, because fight­ing an effi­cient and well thought through war would have been so easy and straight­for­ward if Al Gore had been elected president.

    Enough of that — not that i’m want­ing to main­tain an Obama love­fest from the right, but i got back from Cub Scout Day Camp this after­noon *just* in time to hear a sim­ply mar­velous speech from Pres­i­dent Barack Nobodyelsec­ould­makethat­speech Obama on father­hood and Father’s Day. Truly heart­felt, on point, and uplift­ing with­out being unre­al­is­tic about the obsta­cles we still face. 4 of 10 kids are born out of wed­lock, and say­ing “that really doesn’t mat­ter” had no trac­tion any­where in Obama’s extremely mov­ing per­sonal tes­ti­mony, which he used to open a dia­logue on pol­icy that affirmed tra­di­tional val­ues with­out get­ting overly con­crete on tra­di­tional forms, which strikes me as rea­son­able and appro­pri­ate for a pres­i­dent to avoid (mommy, daddy, poochie, kit­tie, and 2.3 kid­dies on the swingset just doesn’t work as a pol­icy descrip­tion default).

    Could i put my rightwingnut tin­foil hat on and kvetch that he didn’t talk about the sources of the par­ent­ing dilemma we’re in? Actu­ally, no, because i’d think Mike Huck­abee or Mike Pence would be wast­ing time to make that part of the pub­lic dia­logue, and i can’t imag­ine how Obama or Joe Biden could use­fully go there even if they wanted to, and i’m sure they don’t.

    Today’s speech by Obama was part of why i’m still a bit hope­ful about the impact over­all of this admin­is­tra­tion, creep­ing social­ism aside. The speech in Cairo, in my opin­ion, was iden­ti­cal to speeches Bush made, but it does, in fact, sound dif­fer­ent com­ing from Barack Hus­sein Obama; what he clearly wants to say about the com­mit­ment of father­hood and the need for com­mu­ni­ties and social groups to affirm respon­si­ble male behav­ior and, neatly alluded to with­out get­ting mud­dily spe­cific, con­demn­ing irre­spon­si­bil­ity among some men, sim­ply could not be said by a Bush or McCain (or Palin).

    Plus, Demo­c­rat or Repub­li­can, we need to find new metaphors beyond William James’ accursed “moral equiv­a­lent of war” for efforts on things like poverty, father­hood, and health care. Obama’s team may get some refram­ing done that, in turn, can only be fin­ished off and painted and sold by Repub­li­cans. Right now, i’m very proud of our pres­i­dent — check out his speech at http://​www​.white​house​.gov. Worth a read.

  39. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 19th, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    Seri­ously, you want to read this: Obama’s remarks at the Father­hood Town Hall.

  40. moe99 said on June 20th, 2009 at 12:29 am

    Just saw The Vis­i­tor star­ring Richard Jenk­ins. Very touch­ing film.

    And it is a blue moon when I agree with some­one at the Amer­i­can Con­ser­v­a­tive, but I do:
    http://​www​.amcon​mag​.com/​l​a​r​i​s​o​n​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​9​/​a​-​q​u​i​c​k​-​r​o​u​nd-up/

  41. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 20th, 2009 at 9:18 am

    I’ll see your “thirty years of bank­rupt Iran pol­icy” and raise you “fifty years of igno­rant, ill informed Mid­dle East­ern pol­icy,” and no, i don’t mean sup­port of Israel (which i think can be rea­son­ably defended from 1948 through the present, given the orig­i­nal “facts on the ground” in 1947).

    There’s been so lit­tle com­pre­hen­sion of the actual polis of Arab nation­hood, the prac­ti­cal side of Islamic theology(ies), the demo­graph­ics of Moslem regions vis a vis Per­sian and Turk­ish, and an utter, will­ful denial of the eco­nom­ics of oil *within* the Mid­dle East, let alone between that region and the rest of the world — but in sum, i agree (tho’ i don’t often with Lar­i­son, who is Rod Dreher on a full bot­tle of brandy) that Obama has so few options today because of the hand the last few decades have dealt him.

    Only an idiot could say he’s been “silent.” He’s clearly being guarded, in such a way that at each junc­ture, play­ers all around the table are lis­ten­ing closely to what he will or won’t say next. He’s in the game, which is where he ought to be, but not push­ing the bid­ding, which he shouldn’t.

  42. crinoidgirl said on June 20th, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    And now for some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent — John Hodg­man roasts Mr. Obama at the Radio & TV Cor­re­spon­dents’ Dinner:

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​y​W​7​O​P​ByRGDY

  43. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 21st, 2009 at 7:56 am

    Check the YouTube side­bar on that for Obama’s remarks, too.

  44. moe99 said on June 21st, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    Happy father’s day to all you dads out there! Hope the weather’s good and you have some­thing cook­ing on the bbq.

  45. Jolene said on June 21st, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Another pup­py­cam!

  46. Jolene said on June 21st, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    The bril­liant Tom Ricks sneers at Tom Pence.

  47. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 21st, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Ditto Moe’s wish, and — i got a dvd of “Pride & Prej­u­dice”! (The new one with Keira Knightly.) You can tell ties are ded, dead, Dead.

    My apolo­gies to any dad who got a tie; i’ll loan you my dvd when we’ve watched it. Unfor­tu­nately, the way this sum­mer is going, that will be Labor Day.

  48. brian stouder said on June 21st, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    Well, I got a small air com­pres­sor for Father’s day; not sure if Pam was mak­ing a slyly sar­cas­tic point — but a handy machine nonetheless.

    We went to Logans­port for the week­end, and as it hap­pens, Pam’s uncle (only 56!) sud­denly died Fri­day (another story), so that lead to a fairly somber Father’s Day weekend.

    And, coin­ci­den­tally, I noticed a newly-added sign on US-24 near where one turns to head to Pam’s folks’ place. It said “Potawatomi Trail of Death” in large let­ters, with “Regional His­toric Trail” beneath a sil­hou­ette of a (pre­sume­ably) Potawatomi dad and a mom with a baby on her back, and with a bird wheel­ing above them (one sup­poses it’s a noble eagle and not a hun­gry vulture).

    I was so taken with that, that the girls and I headed back to snap a photo — but the sign on US-24 is in a place where no sane per­son would stop; so we pro­ceeded about 10 miles down the Trail of Death to another marker, in a spot fur­ther from the road, and got our photo.

    It did cause me to google, and I came up with this

    http://​www​.potawatomi​-tda​.org/

    Any­way — it sparked dis­cus­sion amongst Grant and Shelby and I, about cru­elty and racism and Amer­ica and Andy Jackson…Shelby asked what would have hap­pened if a Barack Obama could have been pres­i­dent back then — and (after dis­cussing the impos­si­bil­ity of any­one but a white male gain­ing the office 170 years ago) that lead the dis­cus­sion to Pres­i­dent Lin­coln — and the cat­a­clysmic upheaval that fol­lowed his election.

    Any­way, I had heard of “Trail or Tears”, but come to think of it, “Trail of Death” sounds infi­nitely more honest

    (if Pam posts the photo, I’ll link to it)

  49. Connie said on June 22nd, 2009 at 8:09 am

    Brian, some­where on the back roads between Colum­bia City and Ship­she­wana there is a lit­tle park called Indian Kitchen. Accord­ing to the his­tor­i­cal marker it was the site of a kind of last din­ner before the forced march out of Indi­ana began.

  50. brian stouder said on June 22nd, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Some­how, this story ties in…

    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​3​1​4​8​3​4​4​9​/​n​s​/​u​s​_​n​e​w​s​-life/

    an excerpt -

    The U.S. Jus­tice Depart­ment asked a fed­eral judge to dis­miss a law­suit brought by descen­dants of Apache leader Geron­imo, whose remains were pur­ported to be stolen long ago by mem­bers of a secret soci­ety at Yale University.

    and

    Both Pres­i­dents Bush, Mass­a­chu­setts Sen. John Kerry and many oth­ers in pow­er­ful gov­ern­ment and indus­try posi­tions are mem­bers of the soci­ety, which is not affil­i­ated with the university.