nancynall.com » Free crack.

Free crack.

So many inter­est­ing things in the meeee-dya — every so often I like to say it like the pests who brayed it in my ear all these years — this week­end. I hardly know where to start. As many of you know, Detroit is hav­ing a moment in the national spot­light; Time mag­a­zine bought a house in town to be home base for its year­long look at the city. Their first cover story is either this week or last, but I haven’t read it yet (although I book­marked the blog). I’m catch­ing up with every­thing else this week­end:

“On the Media” looks at poverty porn with the unnamed but unmis­tak­able pres­ence of Jim Grif­fioen, aka Sweet Juniper. (The piece slams Time mag­a­zine for its drive-by tac­tics, amus­ingly.)

The New York Times cov­ers Mayor Dave Bing, the ol’ crepe­hanger.

Best of all was this WSJ fea­ture, look­ing at the decline through the lens of a sin­gle house, which was once in the swanki­est neigh­bor­hood in town and today is vacant and recently sold for a four-figure price. This was the part that caught my eye:

In 2005, (a pre­vi­ous owner, the Andrews) found a buyer, Kim­berly Car­pen­ter, will­ing to pay their $189,000 ask­ing price. They were too relieved to ques­tion why Ms. Carpenter’s clos­ing doc­u­ments recorded the sales price as $250,000.

County records show Ms. Car­pen­ter took out simul­ta­ne­ous loans of $200,000 and $50,000 from First NLC Finan­cial Ser­vices, a unit of Fried­man, Billings, Ram­sey Group, an Arling­ton, Va., invest­ment bank. First NLC spe­cial­ized in sub­prime mort­gages — loans for bor­row­ers with dam­aged credit.

At the time, Detroit was swept up in the subprime-lending frenzy that hit much of the coun­try and even­tu­ally sparked the finan­cial cri­sis and deep reces­sion. Lenders became quick to loan to high-risk bor­row­ers.

Ms. Car­pen­ter, 37, says she was buy­ing the house on behalf of her father, Lewis Maxwell, whose own credit record was too blem­ished. “My father han­dled all of that,” she says of the finan­cial details. Her father, who worked on the Chrysler assem­bly line, died of can­cer in 2007.

David and Ruth Andrews say Ms. Car­pen­ter paid them $189,000. They say they don’t know what hap­pened to the other $61,000 entered into sales records.

“I have no idea about any of that,” says Ms. Car­pen­ter. “It’s over. It’s out of my head.”

OK, so clearly Car­pen­ter is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, nor does she come from a long line of sharp knives. When I hear the Tea Party peo­ple com­plain that they’re being asked to bail out peo­ple who got in over their heads, fool­ishly signed papers they shouldn’t have signed, I’m sym­pa­thetic. But Car­pen­ter at least lost the house and is in a world of finan­cial hurt. Why are the NLC bankers not in jail? That’s what I want to know:

Ms. Car­pen­ter quickly fell behind on her pay­ments. In August, 2006, First NLC Finan­cial bun­dled Ms. Carpenter’s first loan with a pool of other trou­bled mort­gages and sold them to Amer­i­can Res­i­den­tial Equi­ties, or ARE, a Miami com­pany that spe­cial­ized in buy­ing bad loans.

First NLC Finan­cial went into liq­ui­da­tion last Jan­u­ary, dragged down by mort­gage losses. Its par­ent com­pany, FBR Group, became Arling­ton Asset Invest­ment Corp. A spokesman for Arling­ton said the com­pany can’t locate the orig­i­nal files on the Car­pen­ter loans or com­ment on the lend­ing deci­sion.

By Novem­ber 2006, ARE’s col­lec­tion agents were after Ms. Car­pen­ter for $218,348.53 on the $200,000 mort­gage, accord­ing to county doc­u­ments.

Good luck with that, ARE. I won­der where the folks are who pimped a quarter-million dol­lars to a woman who can’t even say, today, what hap­pened to her. There’s enough blame in this dis­as­ter to slice it up like a big fat mort­gage tranche. But I’ll be say­ing this until the end: When you open a store giv­ing away free crack if you sign here and here and ini­tial there, and if any­one expresses reser­va­tions you say, “Don’t worry, this is the spe­cial non-addictive crack we’re giv­ing away” — when that hap­pens, you really can’t com­plain that the neigh­bor­hood is sud­denly full of crack­heads.

Oh, well. Onward to the more uplift­ing things:

I’m not an opera fan by a long shot, but I enjoyed this piece about Peter Gelb, the new direc­tor of New York’s Met­ro­pol­i­tan Opera. It was worth read­ing just to pluck this mar­velous bit of jar­gon from the word-sluice: “park and bark,” used to describe singers who can’t act. In usage:

…He has com­mis­sioned new pro­duc­tions, some of works sel­dom seen in New York; signed up new singers, who don’t just “park and bark,” as he puts it, but actu­ally act; and recruited direc­tors from Broad­way…

There was also a great piece, by an opera afi­cionado, look­ing at Bar­bra Streisand and her mirac­u­lous voice, which was bestowed upon a woman who only saw singing as a way to get to what she really wanted to do — act­ing. She doesn’t warm up, she doesn’t read music, she processes every­thing from her gut and ear:

“I hear these melodies,” she said. “I hear horn lines and string lines. That’s what’s fun about record­ing with an orches­tra.” She can sing things, and composer-arrangers like Bill Ross or Jeremy Lub­bock have the skill to write them down, she said.

She talked about record­ing with Mar­vin Ham­lisch. “I can go, ‘That’s not the right chord, no, it has to be an 11th or a 9th or some­thing,’ ” she said. “I just know that the chord has to be in con­trast, it can’t just be this.” She sang a sus­tained husky pitch. “I’ll say: ‘It has to rub. I want that slight rub there.’ ”

It’s funny how, when Streisand was given the chance to just act and not sing, the results were pretty uni­formly crap­ola — “Nuts,” “The Prince of Tides,” and so on — but all agree that what makes her singing spe­cial is how very emo­tional it is, i.e. how much act­ing she does while singing.

Finally, in the On Lan­guage col­umn, a piece on “phantonyms” — words that sound like they should mean some­thing, but don’t. They don’t dis­cuss my per­sonal pet peeve (infa­mous does not mean “really famous”), but it scratched a very spe­cific itch.

On Lan­guage, of course, was William Safire’ col­umn. Who is no longer with us.

Mon­day, Mon­day. Can’t trust that day. (If I may be excused a lit­tle John Phillips lyric.) Have a good one.

59 responses to
“Free crack.”

  1. jcburns

    jcburns said on September 28th, 2009 at 4:32 am

    2:10 am!? It’s a school day, isn’t it? ( let me guess: wind and rain.)

  2. nancy said on September 28th, 2009 at 7:40 am

    I’m work­ing until 2 every morn­ing this week. And ris­ing at the usual ridicu­lous hour. If I don’t kill some­one by week’s end, call the Vat­i­can and alert them to the mir­a­cle.

  3. Lex said on September 28th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    Hooper wants to know why “infa­mous” doesn’t mean “unfa­mous,” which I thought was a pretty good ques­tion for an 8-year-old who can’t spell. More trou­blingly, he’s going all meta on me with his read­ing lessons. On the one hand, I feel obliged to back his teacher. On the other hand, when the les­son mate­r­ial is so crap­pily worded, I’ve got to have at least some sym­pa­thy for his posi­tion.

    A friend with older kids sez I should start prepar­ing now for the inevitable day when Hooper lands with a teacher who isn’t as smart as he is. Sounds like a good idea, I said; how do I pre­pare? “Oh, I have no idea,” she said, “but you need to pre­pare any­way. We didn’t, and it was a dis­as­ter.” Hee.

  4. ROgirl said on September 28th, 2009 at 8:11 am

    I was sur­prised the On Lan­guage col­umn didn’t include spend­thrift.

  5. John said on September 28th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    Lex,

    My son cor­rected his 3rd grade teacher who pro­nounced the “T” in tsunami. Need­less to say, the year went down­hill from that point.

  6. Jim said on September 28th, 2009 at 9:00 am

    I recall a line from “Three Ami­gos”: “He’s not just famous; he’s INfa­mous!”

  7. KLG said on September 28th, 2009 at 9:13 am

    Wow. THAT Dave Bing! Maybe the beloved city of my father’s teenage years in the late 1940s, and for the first year of my life in the mid-1950s, has a chance. Well, it could hap­pen.

  8. Peter said on September 28th, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Jim, my favorite line from the Three Ami­gos was when El Guapo asked his deputy if he had a plethora of pinatas – “Do you know what a plethora is?”

  9. Julie Robinson said on September 28th, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Yep, Time started its series on Detroit this week. Haven’t read it yet, but I did peruse Nancy’s favorite Detroit author, Mitch Albom, who showed up in Parade yes­ter­day. He was shilling for his new book, Have a Lit­tle Faith. And amus­ingly, when I looked up the title on Ama­zon, the page also sug­gested another book title, The Five Jerks You Meet on Earth.

    As a musi­cian I’m always been awed by Bar­bra Stresiand’s voice. It’s a shame that she has often bestowed those golden pipes on mar­ginal mate­r­ial. (I wanted to say “drecky”, is that a word?) But this one was pro­duced by Diana Krall and includes pieces by Leonard Bern­stein and Jacques Brel, so I have high hopes.

  10. Dorothy said on September 28th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    Thay­ing plethora juth maketh me tho happy!

    I myself am a fan of sniglets. I’m really hop­ing y’all are famil­iar with them:
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​S​niglet

    Then there are the peo­ple who use a word that sounds or looks like what they want to say but they use the wrong word. One of the favorites in my fam­ily is using “phan­tom” instead of “fathom.” My niece’s boss says it all the time, as in “I can’t even phan­tom how bad it would be if the Steel­ers lost to the Ben­gals!”

  11. alex said on September 28th, 2009 at 10:13 am

    How about those who flaunt the rules instead of flout­ing them?

  12. LAMary said on September 28th, 2009 at 10:45 am

    Julie, I’m with you. I could get a lot more inter­ested in Bar­bra Streisand if she had never recorded Guilty with the BeeGees. What dreck­i­ness.

  13. ROgirl said on September 28th, 2009 at 10:59 am

    A guy I once worked with told me that some­one else in the com­pany said “pacific” instead of “spe­cific.” I’d never heard of that and thought he was jok­ing, but it was true. It sounded like a speech imped­i­ment.

  14. Rana said on September 28th, 2009 at 11:16 am

    Peter, I love that line – and that movie – as well.

    Lex, as a kid I – and my brother – reg­u­larly found our­selves in your son’s soon-to-be sit­u­a­tion. (The most noto­ri­ous inci­dent involved my brother and a debate about whether or not birds have whiskers. As it turns out, my brother was cor­rect – some do.) The worst was the year one of my teach­ers was replaced by the sub­sti­tute for most of the term; the woman was, to put it bluntly, an idiot, and not one that was good at hid­ing it, either.

    I guess my advice would be to tell your son to learn what he can despite such teach­ers, and to take it as an exer­cise in learn­ing how to look for what they can teach him, and how to feign respect for peo­ple for whom you have lit­tle or none. Some­times one can be sur­prised by what “dumb” peo­ple can teach you (smart is more a mat­ter of pro­cess­ing speed than knowl­edge, in my opin­ion), so don’t assume that just because a teacher has typos in the home­work you know more than they do. Remind him too that being dis­re­spect­ful won’t get him off the hook for the home­work, and it’ll make life harder. And he can always vent at home, where it’s safe to do so.

  15. Sue said on September 28th, 2009 at 11:28 am

    Lex, lis­ten to Rana and then sit down and read together a whole bunch of Roald Dahl, in par­tic­u­lar ‘Matilda’ and ‘Danny, The Cham­pion of the World’, then dis­cuss. Roald comes back again and again to themes about deal­ing with idi­otic and dan­ger­ous adults in sub­ver­sive and cre­ative ways.

  16. moe99 said on September 28th, 2009 at 11:30 am

    As long as we are talk­ing about a sub­set of mala­propisms, let me men­tion my favorite: mon­de­greens.

    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​M​o​n​d​e​greens

    Jimi Hen­drix singing Pur­ple Haze, “S’cuse me while I kiss this guy.”

  17. cosmo panzini said on September 28th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    All the talk of the great things hap­pen­ing to Dee-troit, and not a word about the Lions yes­ter­day? And Streisand–Oy vey, how did she get so rich with such lim­ited gifts?

  18. Jean S said on September 28th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    oh, mon­de­greens my mon­de­greens, how I love thee…

    from an early Jon Car­roll col­umn, this adap­ta­tion of “God Bless Amer­ica” lyrics: “through the night, with a light from a bulb.”

  19. Sue said on September 28th, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    Cosmo, I don’t like Bar­bra but even I have to admit her tal­ent is spe­cial.
    The thing that springs to mind when­ever her name comes up, though, is tele­vi­sion cov­er­age I saw sev­eral years ago of some fundraiser she had at her place, for one of her lib­eral polit­i­cal causes. It was hilar­i­ous, all glit­tery and shiny with Bar­bra speak­ing to a group of appar­ently enrap­tured fel­low lib­er­als as a piano tin­kled accom­pa­ni­ment to her speech. With that odd smack­ing noise she makes when she speaks, it had the feel of a par­ody but these peo­ple were dead seri­ous in their ado­ra­tion.
    Sound famil­iar? Such behav­ior is across the spec­trum, appar­ently, and should be laughed at inde­scrim­i­nately.

  20. kayak woman said on September 28th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    I won­der if there is a word for my octo­ge­nar­ian mother’s ten­dency to sub­sti­tute words. The most recent was when some­one men­tioned tri­fo­cals and, even though she knew that the con­ver­sa­tion was about cor­rec­tive lenses, she took off on a long expla­na­tion about her “tri­cy­cles” and how she didn’t need them any more after her recent cataract surgery.

    My favorite mon­de­green (never heard that word before today, thanks, Moe!) also involves my mother, *many* years ago. After hear­ing an ama­teur duo sing “Leav­ing on a Jet Plane”, she asked, “why on earth would any­one sing about Lin­coln on his death bed?”

  21. Dave K. said on September 28th, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    Cosmo, Pilot Joe and Dex­ter both offered their con­grat­u­la­tions late on the pre­vi­ous thread. I add my hearty “Well Done” as well. Maybe folks heard the score and thought “it must be a mis­take…”.

  22. coozledad said on September 28th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    A friend of mine said she couldn’t lis­ten to Elvis Costello any­more after he released his coun­try album. He’d become an anti-Semite, she said.
    She’d mis­heard the line
    “Why don’t you love me like you used to do?
    Why do you treat me like a worn out shoe?
    as
    Why don’t you love me like you used to do?
    Why do you treat me like a one-eyed Jew?”

  23. LAMary said on September 28th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    I’ve always liked “She’s got the wasted move­ment, Cherry.” by Neil Dia­mond.

  24. Jeff Borden said on September 28th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    Cooz,

    Reminds me of that scene in “Annie Hall,” where the Woody Allen char­ac­ter is con­vinced of another character’s anti-Semitism because he has asked, “Didn’t you,” which Woody’s ears hear as “Jew.”

    Every time I think the indus­try I gave more than three decades of my life to can­not get any cra­zier in its death throes, I read some­thing that sig­nals we have not yet hit bot­tom. I see the New York Times has assigned a staffer –whose iden­tity will be kept secret to pre­vent him from being lob­bied, appar­ently– to mon­i­tor the fever swamps of extreme opin­ions on radio, TV and the Inter­net because the paper appar­ently feels that it is not learn­ing about impor­tant trends like birtherism and death pan­els soon enough.

    Aside from pity­ing the poor staffer who must lis­ten daily to Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Sean Han­nity, Michael Sav­age and the rest of the cir­cus per­form­ers, I’m more than a lit­tle appalled that the nation’s paper of record is sig­nal­ing that it must weigh in on and/or cover the fever dreams of some of these loons. Ugh.

  25. beb said on September 28th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    For the longest tijme I thought the song was “going to the boat show” only to learn just recently that it was “going to the go-go.” Wow, that changes every­thing. Though, of the two I’d prob­a­bly enjoy the boat show over a go-go.

    I felt smugly supe­rior that I rec­og­nized most of the dis­tinc­tions given in the On Lan­guage col­umn.

    Speak­ing of keep­ing up with your chil­dren, recently I was wait­ing for my daughter’s bus to show it. It was run­ning late, so I texted her ask­ing where she was. She replied “en route.” Where the hell did she learn that word? Or now how to spell or use it cor­rectly? It’s not a com­mon con­ver­sa­tional word.

    ROGirl, I think spend­thrift is more an oxy­moron than an phantonym.

    As a city worker I’m less than impressed by Bing’s plan to close a $300 mil­lion hole in the city bud­get through worker con­ces­sions. The prob­lem is that even if he got every­thing he wanted it only comes to $40 mil­lion sav­ings which doesn’t comes close to clos­ing any­thing. He would do bet­ter to ter­mi­nate out­side con­trac­tors and take work back in-house where it can be done cheaper. (Becase munici­ple work­ers aren’t try­ing to make a profit on top of the work per­formed.)

    Maybe I’m just being crankly today.

  26. Julie Robinson said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Beb, you get a pass–anyday that includes con­tem­plat­ing lay­offs in your work­place gives you the right to be cranky and crankly.

  27. Sue said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:18 pm

  28. Dexter said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    I loved my fifth grade teacher, and as I looked back, I real­ized she was the best teacher I had , period.
    I really felt bad when I cor­rected her dur­ing geog­ra­phy. She said “YO-sem-eye-t”. I knew it was Yo-SEMM-uh -tee , because I watched car­toons and Yosemite Sam was a fave. Still, that dumb kid back then should have bit his stu­pid tongue.

  29. 4dbirds said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Well here in DC the callers to sports shows are ready to string up all the Red­skins, their coach and espe­cially their owner for los­ing to Detroit.

  30. Dexter said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

  31. paddyo' said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    ROgirl, in the tra­di­tion of “pacific,” David Let­ter­man pokes fun at that kind of mala­prop­ism when­ever he talks in his mono­logue about “sta­tis­tics” as “satis­tics” …

    OK, Rock­ing Horse Peo­ple, a round of marsh­mal­low pies in honor of dear departed Lucy …

  32. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    The Vice­land story included this sum­mary by Sweet Juniper – “Time mag­a­zine sent a 24-year-old guy to Detroit,” James Grif­fioen told me. “They wouldn’t let him rent a car, so he was dropped off in a cab down­town. He’s there for six hours and he’s sup­posed to write a fea­ture arti­cle on Detroit. For Time. He had a meet­ing with the mayor in the morn­ing, the mayor stood him up, then he had a meet­ing with me, and that was it.”

    I was inter­viewed for a Newsweek story that appears in three weeks, and i have to admit i’m simul­ta­ne­ously excited & ter­ri­fied, given the gen­eral lack of start­ing knowl­edge the writer had com­ing into our sit­u­a­tion, and the obvi­ous con­straints she was work­ing under (non-existent per diem, not worth it to her to spend more than two days on site, and i can’t blame her for that). There’s pres­sure to find the splashy con­flict in a story like ours, but we don’t need more con­flict pumped up between com­mu­nity groups, even though we’d love to have a wider audi­ence for our nar­ra­tive.

    Unlike Detroi­ters, i can’t imag­ine get­ting to where i’d want to tell inquir­ing media sorts to stuff them­selves, but if i saw myself quoted in a half dozen sto­ries none of which helped our cause a bit, and maybe set it back a ways, i’m sure i could find word­ing that was clear but that i wouldn’t feel guilty about using with a stranger.

  33. paddyo' said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    I’m more than mildly sur­prised at Jeff TMMO’s descrip­tion of the ter­ri­ble way our nation’s two “lead­ing news­magazines” are toss­ing off this assign­ment — what I’d call “doing the Detroit story” — but appar­ently not even mak­ing believe they’re doing it jus­tice.

    “Gen­eral lack of start­ing knowl­edge” is astound­ing, as is “lack of per diem” and, in Time’s case, the unwill­ing­ness even to rent a car — not to men­tion six-hours’ duty to pull off the Detroit story. Sheesh. (I recall Sweet Juniper’s blog­post some months ago on his expe­ri­ence squir­ing the Time writer around town after the mayor’s office stiffed him …)

    And if these are staffers and not “merely” free­lancers (whom we all know tend to be treated like excre­ment by many, if not most edi­tors big and small), it’s even worse.

    Which makes Time’s pur­chase of a house all the more amaz­ing — though I gather than many houses in Motown are now cheaper than cars . . .

  34. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 28th, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    I believe both are free­lancers, but since that describes a grow­ing per­cent­age (half?) of the con­tent of Time & Newsweek . . . does this mean that edi­tors will need to not fecally han­dle those writ­ers in the future?

    And i’m not even remotely impressed by Time buy­ing a house in Detroit, espe­cially since i’m sure they did it a) to make a point about how cheaply you can do it, and b) since it was inte­grated into the story, they’ll take it off their taxes.

  35. MichaelG said on September 28th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    My favorite mon­de­green (I even sent it in to Jon Car­roll one time) is Neil Diamond’s “Crack­lin’ Rosie Peed on the Floor”.

    The Sacto Bee is call­ing the Red­skins “The Raiders of the East Coast” and goes on for a col­umn with rea­sons and com­par­isons.

  36. velvet goldmine said on September 28th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    There’s a bath­room on the right

  37. Hexdecimal said on September 28th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Nuke, Nuke, Nuke, Nuke the girl – Gene Chan­dler

  38. Jean S said on September 28th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    it’s a doggy dog world.

    I told you I love them!!

  39. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 28th, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Oh, and by the way — Betty was an anthro­pol­ogy major? Get. Out.

    Trivia point worth know­ing is that Mar­garet Mead was a minister’s wife for five years before she decided to “cut loose.” But she and Luther Cress­man hadn’t had a child yet (and Luther him­self was prepar­ing to leave the min­istry to get his advanced degree in archae­ol­ogy). Mead & Dr. Spock were big deals in the early 60s . . . hmmm.

  40. deb said on September 28th, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    dex­ter, in high school one of my eng­lish teach­ers read us a poem with the line “lis­ten to the cal­liope.” she pro­nounced it KALL-ee-ope. sheesh.

  41. Sue said on September 28th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

  42. coozledad said on September 28th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    Sue: They’ve pretty much taken up here. I’m just as likely to trip over one. I’ll try and get some pic­tures of them hob­nob­bing with the goats.

  43. Hexdecimal said on September 28th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

  44. LAMary said on September 28th, 2009 at 8:05 pm

    West Vir­ginia wins for deer squash­ing.

  45. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 28th, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    I dunno, west­ern Penn­syl­va­nia has the high­est piles of car­casses on the road­sides (vs. OH & WV).

  46. LAMary said on September 28th, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    That map Sue linked shows a one in 39 chance of hav­ing a deer acci­dent.
    I feel safe here in CA. One in 1488.

    Speak­ing of killing wildlife, Sarah Palin’s book will be com­ing out on 11/17. Bet­ter get in line now.

  47. Dorothy said on September 28th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    My brother Dave thought the Bee Gees were singing about a “bald-headed woman” (more than a woman).

  48. Connie said on September 28th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    I must admit that for years I won­der how it was “F**k the Cas­bah” could be played on the radio.

  49. crazycatlady said on September 29th, 2009 at 12:35 am

    ‘Climb every woman’ was about tall ladies? The real words are “I’m Every Woman’.

  50. Dexter said on September 29th, 2009 at 1:29 am

    I watched the Ken Burns thing. It was spe­cial to me because I learned a lot about the rela­tion­ship between Theodore Roo­sevelt and John Muir. I have blogged here before about my awe-filled vis­its to Muir Woods and Yosemite National Park when I was in Cal­i­for­nia when I was a young man. I drove to Yosemite a few times and like TR and Muir, I slept on an army pon­cho thrown on the ground , under the stars. Back on the coast, I walked around in Muir Woods totally awe struck.
    I had for­got­ten the lit­tle foot­note I had read about the Hetch-Hetchy dam/reservoir project that broke John Muir’s heart and spirit.
    When I was a kid in school in Indi­ana, we were taught Indi­ana his­tory.
    I won­der if Cal­i­for­nia kids were taught about the polit­i­cal power play that was exerted to dam-up that won­der­ful val­ley a hun­dred years ago.
    I thought this show last night was well worth the time.

  51. MarkH said on September 29th, 2009 at 2:39 am

    What Dex­ter said. I’m watch­ing episode 2 right now cour­tesy of the direct feed from PBS, and saw your post. How close we came to not hav­ing national parks, if not for the well-known Muir, and many oth­ers I had not heard of. TR cer­tainly becomes a big hero when the power of the Antiq­ui­ties Act is dropped in his lap. Then Hetch-Hetchy hap­pened and broke Muir’s heart, as you said. The series is excel­lent and more than worth your time.

  52. Deborah said on September 29th, 2009 at 6:53 am

    MarkH, do you see a cor­re­la­tion between not hav­ing National Parks and not hav­ing National Health­care? They are both inter­ested in pre­serv­ing our great­est National trea­sures that com­merce was/is squan­der­ing. Are they not sim­i­lar?

  53. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Ask any hos­pi­tal admin­is­tra­tor – we have a national health care pol­icy. That’s not say­ing “end of dis­cus­sion,” but for con­text, it’s impor­tant to think it through from that angle. The debate is how big it should become, and whether it should be more state-by-state, or more fed­er­ally man­aged.

    Right now, you have an implicit “right” to emer­gency care, unevenly (unequally) pro­vided across the coun­try through pub­lic hos­pi­tal ERs. There’s broad agree­ment this is not enough, and may actu­ally cost more than pro­vid­ing more com­pre­hen­sive care. But jump­ing from that sys­tem to a “right” to equiv­a­lent care for all res­i­dents of the coun­try, regard­less of loca­tion — that’s com­pa­ra­ble to going from a com­mit­ment to pro­vide shel­ter for all cit­i­zens to mak­ing hous­ing a right, and defin­ing it as no less than 600 sq ft per per­son with pri­vate bath­room & kitch­enette as a legal min­i­mum stan­dard. I can argue that get­ting to that out­come is desir­able and morally incum­bent on us, but still say that mak­ing it a right, when we have no idea how to pay for it and deliver it, sim­ply puts the gov­ern­ment simul­ta­ne­ously on the defen­sive and forces intru­sion into the econ­omy in a way that is very likely to actu­ally impede the deliv­ery of hous­ing ser­vices to those get­ting it right now.

    Mak­ing the House/Senate plan level of health care a “civil right,” which is what i hear said with great sin­cer­ity and pas­sion, is going to have more neg­a­tive out­comes than pos­i­tive ones, even beyond the unsus­tain­abil­ity of that level across the board. It will take us back to the pre-1997 enti­tle­ment approach to gov­ern­men­tal ben­e­fits, and the sticky trap of AFDC and lit­i­ga­tion as social work. Add in that we couldn’t have afforded that cost, socially, even before 2008, and i gotta say “whoa.”

  54. Lex said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:48 am

    Rana: Hooper didn’t think the teacher was dumb; he was just stunned that she couldn’t see it his way, too. (And he’s a pretty polite kid. He just often finds him­self con­fused, for good rea­son.)

    Sue: Dahl! Of course! Why didn’t I think of that? (smacks self in head)

    And for all inter­ested in mon­de­greens, there’s KissThis​Guy​.com. Enjoy!

  55. ROgirl said on September 29th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Good Vibra­tions always had me con­fused. I thought it was “gotta keep those love good vibra­tions a half man weather.”

    The real lyrics are pretty strange any­way: “gotta keep those lovin’ good vibra­tions a hap­penin’ with her.” Thank you, Brian Wil­son.

  56. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:06 am

    Flip side — by way of my wife, a for­mer NPS nat­u­ral­ist ranger and PhD in non-formal education/natural resources inter­pre­ta­tion: over 98% of all vis­i­tors to national parks never get more than 150 feet from their car.

    If i weren’t a con­ser­v­a­tive, i’d say there should be fed­eral leg­is­la­tion requir­ing every­one to spend at least one week a year not using a car (spe­cial pro­vi­sion for dis­abled per­sons, etc.), and call for a national pro­gram to ensure that each per­son take at least two nature hikes a sea­son. Ide­ally with Shel­ton John­son.

  57. Crabby said on September 29th, 2009 at 9:56 am

  58. LAMary said on September 29th, 2009 at 10:50 am

    Crabby, those are such per­fect look­ing deer. I know they eat the gar­den and spread ticks and things, but, awwww. They look like Bambi.

  59. Deborah said on September 29th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Every­thing you’ve said jeff (tmmo) about the cost being too high and dire out­comes of National Health­care was said back then to try to keep the gov­ern­ment from hav­ing and fund­ing National Parks. And it didn’t hap­pen.