This wouldn’t be the internet…

…if there weren’t the occasional snickering sex story linked here, would it? Behold, the burning issue of vagina size, thoroughly explored in a respectable Manhattan newspaper.

Posted at 9:15 am in Uncategorized |

4 responses to “This wouldn’t be the internet…”

  1. alex said on October 22, 2003 at 12:09 pm

    Ah! Coochie snorcher! Forgot about that one. Never saw the Monologues myself, but I certainly remember reading that pet name in some review somewhere.

    Women have the upper hand not because of the nether region but rather the top shelf. They can augment theirs. Men can spend money on all kinda quackery for their dinky winky, but there’s really nothing medical science can do for your dick that’s on a par with a boob job.

    But, hey. After the romance wears off, everyone’s either a pin dick or a glass of water.

    518 chars

  2. michael golden said on October 22, 2003 at 8:47 pm

    Oh boy. This could be trouble, but I’ll say this very simply. During my various single years before and between marriages, I, how shall I say it, well . . . I very diligently practiced heterosexuality. After a number of years and some serious sampling and without going into specifics, I can say definitively that there is significant variation in the sizes of women’s vaginas. This is not judgemental and shouldn’t cause controversy. It isn’t good or bad. It’s simply the way things are.

    497 chars

  3. Nance said on October 22, 2003 at 9:43 pm

    Did you read far enough to the part where Dian Hanson, as much an expert as you can probably find on the subject, says this is one area where heavier women have it over the teeny tiny ones? Go, fat chicks.

    205 chars

  4. John Ritter said on October 23, 2003 at 8:23 am

    What is the next discussion going to be? Loose shoes or a warm place to shit?

    81 chars