and regarding the possibly risky content — now I understand the origins of the ‘facial tic’ you mentioned
brian stoudersaid on June 17th, 2005 at 5:15 pm
oops! I guess I have a tic, too.
This site could use a ‘delete’ button
harry near indysaid on June 18th, 2005 at 4:21 am
damn, i love the smell of burning bridges!
too, too bad that, according to murphy, the spirit of the journal was crushed by the spirit of the sentinel — the hearst sentinel.
folks, back in the day, hearst was the rupert murdoch of his day.
i bet he smiles in hell when he thinks of that.
poochloversaid on June 18th, 2005 at 9:36 am
you go, girl!!!
i know nothing about a newsroom or your profession, but understood completely what you were saying!
bassetsaid on June 18th, 2005 at 4:49 pm
haven’t seen the article in question and don’t particularly care to, but a former Journal photographer who later taught at Indiana U. was one of the two guiding lights of my misspent career in tv news, so I felt compelled to run my mouth to Romenesko on that topic. let’s see if it gets onto the page.
hmmm, two journalistic role models, one in Milwaukee and the other in Wichita. maybe that’s why I never made the big time.
hey harry…when you say it’s too bad the spirit of the journal was crushed by the spirit of the sentinel, i can only conclude that you weren’t reading either paper from, say, 1985 until the two merged 10 years later. i worked at the sentinel, and during that decade it wasn’t “the hearst sentinel” at all. we were the redheaded stepchild of the journal company — underpaid, understaffed and underappreciated. but we were proud, we were scrappy, we covered the goddamn news, and we regularly kicked the journal’s ass.
(Order your Amazon through me and I earn 4 percent. Click the “powered by Amazon” logo.)
brian stouder said on June 17th, 2005 at 5:11 pm
that was pretty good!
Now I understand the ‘facial tic’…
brian stouder said on June 17th, 2005 at 5:13 pm
that was a pretty good letter!
and regarding the possibly risky content — now I understand the origins of the ‘facial tic’ you mentioned
brian stouder said on June 17th, 2005 at 5:15 pm
oops! I guess I have a tic, too.
This site could use a ‘delete’ button
harry near indy said on June 18th, 2005 at 4:21 am
damn, i love the smell of burning bridges!
too, too bad that, according to murphy, the spirit of the journal was crushed by the spirit of the sentinel — the hearst sentinel.
folks, back in the day, hearst was the rupert murdoch of his day.
i bet he smiles in hell when he thinks of that.
poochlover said on June 18th, 2005 at 9:36 am
you go, girl!!!
i know nothing about a newsroom or your profession, but understood completely what you were saying!
basset said on June 18th, 2005 at 4:49 pm
haven’t seen the article in question and don’t particularly care to, but a former Journal photographer who later taught at Indiana U. was one of the two guiding lights of my misspent career in tv news, so I felt compelled to run my mouth to Romenesko on that topic. let’s see if it gets onto the page.
hmmm, two journalistic role models, one in Milwaukee and the other in Wichita. maybe that’s why I never made the big time.
naaaaah.
Sheila said on June 19th, 2005 at 11:35 am
Great stuff, Nancy. Here’s to yer chops.
deb said on June 20th, 2005 at 1:16 pm
hey harry…when you say it’s too bad the spirit of the journal was crushed by the spirit of the sentinel, i can only conclude that you weren’t reading either paper from, say, 1985 until the two merged 10 years later. i worked at the sentinel, and during that decade it wasn’t “the hearst sentinel” at all. we were the redheaded stepchild of the journal company — underpaid, understaffed and underappreciated. but we were proud, we were scrappy, we covered the goddamn news, and we regularly kicked the journal’s ass.