nancynall.com » What a boob.

What a boob.

The pain sit­u­a­tion has esca­lated. Mrs. R. Knee has now been heard from. Yes­ter­day I found myself long­ing for a cane, and curs­ing the one truth of being female: The body you hated yes­ter­day will be the one you long for today. When you’re younger, you think, “Remem­ber four years ago, when I thought I was so fat? I wish I was that skinny now.” And then you get older, and you think, “Remem­ber four days ago, when I was merely sore? I wish I was sore now, instead of crip­pled, too.”

The doc­tor has been called. I’ll spare you more details.

Well, this: While I was recu­per­at­ing yes­ter­day, I found the most awe­some bra store online. I usu­ally buy my chest ham­mocks from Harp’s in Birm­ing­ham, which along Town Shop in New York City may be the two great­est bra stores on the planet. Amus­ingly, both stores share a secret weapon: A tiny Jew­ish lady behind the counter who has seen every boob shape under the sun and can tell your size through a win­ter coat with 99 per­cent accu­racy. Excuse me, make that “shared.” The New York Times has a way with obits:

Selma Koch, a Man­hat­tan store owner who earned a national rep­u­ta­tion by help­ing women find the right bra size, mostly through a dis­cern­ing glance and never with a tape mea­sure, died Thurs­day at Mount Sinai Med­ical Cen­ter. She was 95 and a 34B.

Mrs. Harp is also in her 10th decade, and still works most days. The last time I inter­viewed her, I asked if she was pass­ing the store along to her heirs. She said “none of my grand­chil­dren want to work as hard as Nana.”

In this econ­omy, I’m not tak­ing my busi­ness else­where. But I like the cus­tomer com­ments on the web­site, where I note that nearly every woman refers to her breasts as “the girls” or “the twins.” Taken along with Kramer’s famous line about tighty whities — “My boys need a house!” — this would seem to be a uni­ver­sal pref­er­ence. The clos­est I ever came to giv­ing my own a sep­a­rate iden­tity was when I was nurs­ing a new­born, and they were so stripped of eroti­cism that one day I nearly answered the door with my shirt open to the waist. That would have given the UPS man a jolt, I’d say, although to me, they were just another cou­ple of hard-workin’ body parts. Like my feet.

OK, now that I’ve, uh, low­ered the tone, let’s see if we can’t wal­low around down here for a while.

This is why I hardly ever read sci­ence fic­tion. Slate unpacks Mitt Romney’s fond­ness for “Bat­tle­field Earth,” L. Ron Hubbard’s, er, novel:

For those of you who didn’t study it in school, “Bat­tle­field Earth” takes place in the year 3000, when the human race is nearly extinct and the planet stripped of its nat­ural resources. Mankind has been enslaved by evil aliens with very bad breath that explodes when it comes into con­tact with radioac­tive mate­r­ial. A young slave wield­ing lasers and draped in a ten­nis cardi­gan leads a rebel­lion and retakes Earth, only to be attacked again by a series of foes includ­ing a race of inter­stel­lar bankers try­ing to col­lect on bad debts. (There may be kung-fu fights and a cham­pi­onship foot­ball game, too; I con­fess that I haven’t read it all.)

Remem­ber that Jon Car­roll col­umn on mir­a­cles? Here’s the 20 Most Amaz­ing Coin­ci­dences, includ­ing the James Dean car curse. In doesn’t include one I heard about many years ago, when a pho­tog­ra­phy mag­a­zine ran a famous tabloid photo of a man being car­ried into an ER with what appears to be a tele­phone pole dri­ven through the cen­ter of his chest. The man was awake and calm, and the story was that the pole some­how shoved all his vital organs aside on its trip into his vis­cera, spar­ing his life. He spent months in a hos­pi­tal recov­er­ing, only to be released and, just a few weeks later, swept off a jetty on Long Island by a freak­ishly large wave, never to be seen again. A super­sti­tious per­son might say the devil had come to col­lect one way or another, but I say: Life is strange.

Shower-bound, I am. Don’t spend too much time with the boob pic­tures, guys.

31 responses to
“What a boob.”

  1. Marcia said on May 3rd, 2007 at 9:28 am

    Nancy, I’m sorry about your injuries. Take care of yourself.

    Now, at last, it’s my turn to be the com­menter who has, per­son­ally encoun­tered the famous peo­ple men­tioned in your post.

    Well, okay, they aren’t peo­ple. But I too have seen every boob shape under the sun. Assist­ing with lac­ta­tion is part of my job, and man, there’s some fright­en­ing stuff out there. Some­times I look at, um, things through the eyes of the baby and think, dear God, I wouldn’t want to latch on to that either.

    Ahem. Right now I am men­tally rant­ing against the every-so-often study that comes out that puts a salary on the duties of a stay-at-home mom.

    Every time, it makes my blood boil. Who the hell do they think does that stuff in the home of a work­ing mother? I’ll tell you who – it’s me! I do! I do every­thing the stay-at-home chick does, plus I bring in a sub­stan­tial part of the house­hold income. Kiss my tired feet once in a while, will you?

  2. Marcia said on May 3rd, 2007 at 9:31 am

    Okay, so there’s a bit of stray comma stuff going on it that com­ment. So what. It’s hard to be punc­tu­a­tion­ally per­fect after WORKING ALL NIGHT AND COMING HOME AND GETTING PEOPLE READY FOR SCHOOL WHILE STRAIGHTENING THE HOUSE AND BEING TOTALLY UNAPPRECIATED BY THE MEDIA FOR EVERYTHING I DO, ALL BEFORE GETTING TO BED.

    Which is where I should be head­ing. I seem to be a lit­tle cranky. ‘Night.

  3. Marcia said on May 3rd, 2007 at 9:34 am

    P.S. Nance, while you’re lying around, you can check out my kid’s cute prom pic­tures. (He’s the guy with the red tie and the, um, big hair.)

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​v​v​t​u​K​pQa3D0

  4. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2007 at 9:44 am

    Mar­cia — you have a hand­some son, who looks like quite the lady’s (or is it ladies’?) man.

    And his prom date is wear­ing gloves?! Are those back ‘in’?

    Any­way — I’m headed back to the boob pictures

  5. Dorothy said on May 3rd, 2007 at 10:09 am

    I like to unhar­ness “the team” in the evening right after I walk the dog for the last time. Ahhhh.. what a relief!

    Hey Con­nie — I’m leav­ing in 45 min­utes for my last Syn­Visc injec­tion. My knee feels ter­rific most of the time! Every once in while it gives on me, but I think that’s the torn car­ti­lage play­ing tricks on me, not the arthritis.

  6. alex said on May 3rd, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    If you hear any noise, it ain’t the boys…

  7. Cathy Dee said on May 3rd, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    If you have to unhar­ness the team, you need to visit the dead lady who can eye-ball your bra size! Sounds like your bri­dle is too tight.

  8. ashley said on May 3rd, 2007 at 2:20 pm

    Mitt Rom­ney and Bat­tle­field Earth, eh? Well, it just shows that cults aren’t all that dif­fer­ent from each other, whether they be Mor­mon or $cientology.

  9. MichaelG said on May 3rd, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    If he’s a Mor­mon why’s his fave book the Bible?

  10. Dorothy said on May 3rd, 2007 at 2:58 pm

    Nah Cathy, it’s just an expres­sion! I heard it from a friend on the Inter­net about 10 years ago. Cracked me up so I like to use it now and then. My team is cozy at the moment I’m glad to say!!

  11. Jolene said on May 3rd, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    “95 and a 34B” is one of the best phrases I’ve ever heard. Love it, as I do this blog … even though I rarely comment.

  12. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    I loved the ‘unhar­ness the team’ imagery, too! (reminded me of the com­mer­cial where the unhitched Clydes­dales are cavort­ing on the beach and in the surf…sorta)

    A cynic would say that Madam Telling Tales really DID change her NN.c for­mat to “Sparkling com­men­tary; analy­sis of items of pass­ing inter­est; boobs”

    …and indeed, I like it!

  13. Jeff said on May 3rd, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    (Off topic for Dorothy from pre­vi­ous post’s comments)

    Dorothy –

    Go to http://​www​.deni​son​.edu and check the employ­ment list­ings, more specif­i­cally, http://​www​.deni​son​.edu/​h​u​m​a​n​_​r​e​s​/​p​o​s​tings/ ; Deni­son is that rar­ity where the online post­ings show up as early as any­one else has seen them, and they like to get the online response (it’s a very wired cam­pus). Kenyon is even closer (depend­ing on where you buy, of course), but i don’t know their sys­tem a’tall. Also Ohio State (www​.osu​.edu, natch) has a large branch in Newark, and employ­ment is posted and you could apply there as well before you even get back to Ohio.

    And feel free to email me with any other ques­tions you have (click my name and the address is mildly masked from spam­bots in the header of the blogspot page).

    Help­fully yours,
    Jeff

  14. Rory on Lawn Guyland said on May 3rd, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    Nance: Was in sim­i­lar (painful) straits this week. Hurt my foot from run­ning and shoul­der from lift­ing (at the gym). After lis­ten­ing to me whine (inter­minably), wife said to go on Advil every fours hours for a few days. Seems to be work­ing! No pain.Might wanna give it a try.

    Mr.-Fighting-off-aging-as-55-looms-this-August

  15. Dorothy said on May 3rd, 2007 at 4:31 pm

    Many heart­felt thanks, Jeff!!! I’ll do all that once I can wrest the com­puter away from my hus­band at home.

  16. MarkH said on May 3rd, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    I have noticed other euphemisms of breast tandem­ness like Dorothy’s lately (Wow, does THAT sen­tence look strange). My wife’s are “the girls”; either Mariah Carey’s or Scar­lett Johanssen’s are “the twins”. Any others?

    BTW, Dorothy, like Jeff, I vote for Deni­son. Great col­lege, beau­ti­ful town (Granville); a cou­ple of high school bud­dies went there, as well as my old high school prin­ci­pal, as an admin­is­tra­tor in the ‘70s-‘80s.

    Off-topic: any­one got an opin­ion on the Time 100 Most Influ­en­tial? Osama bin-Laden made it, W didn’t.

    The ter­ror­ists have won.

    http://​www​.time​.com/​t​i​m​e​/​s​p​e​c​i​a​l​s​/​2​0​0​7​/​t​i​m​e​1​0​0​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​0​,​2​8​8​0​4​,​1​5​9​5​3​2​6​_​1​5​9​5​3​3​2​,​0​0.html

  17. LA mary said on May 3rd, 2007 at 7:56 pm

    I know what you mean about what breast feed­ing does to your atti­tude toward your tits. Mod­esty seems irrelevant.

  18. Dorothy said on May 3rd, 2007 at 8:26 pm

    Here, here Mary. I agree whole­heart­edly. I nursed my first for 20 months, the sec­ond for 19 months.

    Hey I cre­ated an OUTSTANDING cover let­ter, Jeff, and I’m mail­ing it off with a copy of my resume tomor­row! Thanks for the tip. If I get a job there, I owe you and your Beloved a dinner!

  19. Jeff said on May 3rd, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    Re: Um, boobs

    Any­one else watch­ing the Repub­li­can gag­gle? Can’t call it a debate … Matthews is not really up to the man­age­ment task of mod­er­at­ing this, either; like the prover­bial car wreck, tho’, i can’t turn away (touch typ­ing, y’know).

    Bless­ings and good luck, Dorothy!

  20. brian stouder said on May 3rd, 2007 at 9:55 pm

    Jeff — you got that right! Who was it that got asked if a pri­vate employer should have the right to fire an employee for being gay? Was it Gov­er­nor Thomp­son? And he stands there silently for 5 sec­onds — and then says some­thing like “Pri­vate employ­ers need to have the free­dom to do what they want” — and then another awk­ward silence — and the ques­tioner says “that’s a ‘yes’ then?”!!!

    Good God!! The follow-up that SHOULD have been asked, but was not — was ‘Well — should a pri­vate employer have the right to fire employ­ees for being black?”

    But of course there wa no follow-up, and they mean­dered for­ward from there. Rudy and McCain were inter­est­ing, Rom­ney looked like a used-car sales­man, and the oth­ers were out to lunch — includ­ing the moderators!

    And I’m sorry — and I’m sure a mil­lion other peo­ple will com­ment on this — but wasn’t it flat-out bizarre that the debate took place beneath a Boe­ing 707 sus­pended from the ceil­ing? What a strange, even off-putting set­ting, espe­cially given the cen­tral­ity of the Sep­tem­ber 11 sui­cide plane crash attacks to Amer­i­can politics

  21. John said on May 4th, 2007 at 7:51 am

    “Mod­esty seems irrelevant.”

    My wife wasn’t a mil­i­tant nurser, but if you were in the same zip code when the kid was eat­ing, you got the show. Not because she was a crazed exhi­bi­tion­ist (that’s an entirely dif­fer­ent dis­cus­sion), but rather because her first pri­or­ity was her child and not the false sen­si­bil­i­ties of those around her. I am in the camp of “what­ever the mom thinks is best for her and her child is okay with me”. So as much as I enjoy a fine fig­ured lady (i.e. one that is breath­ing), I never for an instant for­got the true and much, much higher pur­pose served by today’s topic.

  22. brian stouder said on May 4th, 2007 at 8:55 am

    Hey Dorothy — Kenyon col­lege was attended by where Salmon P Chase, whose uncle (Phi­lan­der) ran the place; and by Edwin Stanton.

    I bet they have some inter­est­ing things in their library

  23. Kirk said on May 4th, 2007 at 9:00 am

    Paul New­man a Kenyon guy, too.

  24. Dorothy said on May 4th, 2007 at 11:23 am

    AND Alli­son Janey. I did my homework!

  25. michaelj said on May 5th, 2007 at 6:44 am

    The idea that Mitt would like Bat­tle­field Earth is sort of spec­tac­u­lar, but it’s not really sur­pris­ing. Joseph Smith. L. Ron. The dif­fer­ence, other than cen­turies? Do the tem­ple u-trou inter­fere with the mirac­u­lous and mys­te­ri­ous work­ings of the e-meter? Are the Sons of Dan watch­ing his back and run­ning his campaign?If hip-hop nation is crit­i­cized for ‘don’t snitch’, what about a lat­ter day reli­gion that insists on always snitching?

    Blam­ing bBat­tle­field Earth on sci­ence fic­tion is pretty base calumny. I sup­pose if Kurt Von­negut was a sci­ence fic­tion writer, Tom Pyn­chon is too. I guess Jonathan Strange and Mr Nor­rell is period sci­ence fic­tion, and Lempriere’s Dic­tio­nary. (H. G. Wells or Chas. Dick­ens – well, that’s a very close call, and Dick­ens was obvi­ously aching to write sci­ence fiction.)

    Every one a bet­ter writer than a hack like, say, Ernest Hem­ing­way. Maybe not a good exam­ple since almost any­body writes bet­ter. Except William Faulkner.

    Who’d have thought the secret to longevity would be sell­ing bras. As sec­ond careers go, this sounds inter­est­ing, sinced I’ve never really seen a bosom I didn’t find attrac­tive. But I’ve always been a fool for long legs, and I fear my good heart and naivete might be taken advan­tage of in this busi­ness. And my IRA won’t make it to 95. As far as nurs­ing in pub­lic, I get queasy think­ing about what’s going on in the minds of offi­cious men that have a prob­lem with that. Call­ing Mr. Tobias. Jus­tice Thomas?

  26. basset said on May 5th, 2007 at 9:51 am

    “chest ham­mock”? that’s a new one.

    I like the term Penn & Teller used in their (bril­liant, btw) gun con­trol video… “tit sling.”

    (con­text: a female shopowner who kept guns all over the place, includ­ing a pis­tol down her bosom.)

  27. Unindicted Co-conspirator said on May 5th, 2007 at 9:18 pm

    I’m flat out amazed that Willard’s love for L. Ron’s wretched book hasn’t become a cam­paign issue!
    Where is the GOP blo­gos­phere?
    Don’t the Freep­ers under­stand that read­ing such a crappy, over­long mess, let alone lov­ing it makes Willard a really strange guy?
    I think he’d have come off sane if he said some­thing by Hein­lein, Asi­mov or even Doc Smith was his fave, not some crap from a washed up hack like Hub­bard!
    This makes him as loony as either McCain or Rudy [you must read the Guil­iani pro­file in the June Van­ity Fair, Rudy is so obvi­ously men­tally ill, it’s sad].

  28. brian stouder said on May 5th, 2007 at 11:06 pm

    Well, Rudy’s pri­vate life is a train­wreck, but the guy has a flair for pub­lic lead­er­ship, and cri­sis man­age­ment. McCain has ‘seen the ele­phant’, but he missed his chance at the pres­i­dency in 2000, and now he comes across as a very good kar­ioke (spelling?) singer…entertaining enough at try­ing to sound the way he should, but not the real deal.

    But no mat­ter — I am smit­ten with the junior sen­a­tor from Illi­nois, who made his announce­ment in front of the old state cap­i­tal in Spring­field, and invoked Lin­coln to great effect

  29. michaelj said on May 6th, 2007 at 5:24 pm

    America’s mayor put the com­mu­ni­ca­tions cen­ter for crises at the absolute most likely ground zero for a cat­a­stro­phe. Really clever plan­ning. And he put the noted mob­ster manque Bernard Kerik in charge of everything.

    The fact that Repub­li­can ‘base’ vot­ers would sup­port a guy with weirder than Hol­ly­wood (or Bol­ly­wood) pri­vate life after they spent $70 mil of our money on the voyeur per­vert Ken Starr, just so they can win ought to make sane peo­ple ques­tion their motives.

  30. brian stouder said on May 6th, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    America’s mayor put the com­mu­ni­ca­tions cen­ter for crises at the absolute most likely ground zero for a cat­a­stro­phe. Really clever planning.

    horse feath­ers, michaelj. Look­ing back, he put the com­mand cen­ter exactly where Atta and the other nihilis­tic shit­heads struck — but who thought that the World Trade Center’s twin 110 story tow­ers would be gone — GONE — in a sequence of events that took a sin­gle hour? And that, in cat­a­stroph­i­cally los­ing the twin tow­ers — we would also lose WTC-7 (where the com­mand cen­ter was) — which was what? — 50 sto­ries tall? — before the sun went down?

    Rudy has a fouled up per­sonal life, but he was the one real leader who emerged and did his job unfail­ingly and with­out hes­i­ta­tion on that infa­mous day.

    Rudy is OK, but Obama appeals to me

  31. michaelj said on May 7th, 2007 at 2:26 am

    Gee, I don’t know? Where could they have put that com­mu­ni­ca­tions cen­ter? Cheney’s bunker. And who would have thought, if they hadn’t read the hair on fire PDB about fly­ing air­planes into build­ings>? Maybe the com­mu­ni­ca­tions cen­ter for all of NYC’s first respon­ders needed to be located within walk­ing dis­tance of Kerik’s lovenest.

    Then there’s the mat­ter of Rude­boy Giu­liani man­ag­ing to out­rage even a staunch loy­al­ist Bushie like Chris­tine “Stop and Frisk” Todd Whit­ney by lying his ass off about air qual­ity in the lower east side. Well, you know, those peo­ple didn’t vote for him any­way. Maybe he’d like to be Pret­zeldent to hold off the law­suits for a few years with spu­ri­ous claims of exec­u­tive priv­i­lege. Being a whack­job is one thing. Being a polit­i­cally cor­rupt malfea­sor of a mayor of the biggest city in Amer­ica is another.

    Any­way, if the so-called GOP base will sup­port this guy, it pretty much proves there’s no moral­ity in the moral major­ity, just a mind­less obses­sion with dom­i­na­tion of other people’s thoughts and actions. And shred­ding the Amer­i­can Con­sti­tu­tion while they’re at it.

    I’d vote for any decent dog of what­ever color against any Repub­li­can so my opin­ion doesn’t count for much, but if Hagel doesn’t run, the Repub­li­cans don’t seem to have a can­di­date worth any­thing more than deri­sion, indict­ment, or bank­ruptcy by class action civil suit for wrong­ful death.