nancynall.com » Fatal distraction.

Fatal distraction.

Noth­ing like a lit­tle smack in the face to start your Mon­day off right. From a story in my alma mater, the Colum­bus Dis­patch:

Patrick Sims was dri­ving and typ­ing a text mes­sage when he fatally struck a bicy­clist in Col­orado. Ash­ley Miller was doing the same when she killed a dri­ver in Ari­zona. And New Yorker Bai­ley Good­man might have been read­ing or typ­ing when she slammed into a tractor-trailer, killing her­self and four pas­sen­gers.

Even if you dis­count the final exam­ple — dead men tell no tales — that’s some sober­ing stuff there. Peo­ple some­times ask me why I still drive a stick shift, and I tell them, “Because you have to pay atten­tion.” Also, it occu­pies your tex­ting hand.

Ah, what a week­end. Lessons learned: Don’t eat braised lamb shanks at 10 p.m., fol­lowed by a big cup of strong cof­fee, if you want to sleep well that night. Also, avoid scal­lops the next night, unless you want to spend early Sun­day morn­ing throw­ing up. In between was some fine sail­ing with John C and his wife Mary, on their share-boat Voyageur, which is docked at Wind­mill Point, Grosse Pointe Park’s pub­lic marina. Wind­mill Point is at the very bot­tom of Lake St. Claire, where it fun­nels into the Detroit River. The cur­rent is stronger, and the freighters come a lot closer:

img_1749.JPG

But you get a lit­tle sky­line with your sun­sets, imper­fectly cap­tured here:

img_1756.JPG

Every­body looks at the sun­set, but when you’re on the water, it’s always reward­ing to look to the east, too, to see the dark ris­ing out of the lake:

img_1760.JPG

I don’t know if I got bad scal­lops or just too much fine food in too short a time. My life is so PB&J these days, it’s a shock to the sys­tem to see a white table­cloth. Maybe that’s what did it. In any case, it made for a wasted Sun­day; noth­ing like dehy­dra­tion to take it out of a gal.

So let’s skip to the blog­gage:

The pros but mostly cons of mer­ce­nar­ies: “If I’ve got one ambi­tion left here,” (the Amer­i­can offi­cer serv­ing in Iraq) said, “it’s to see one of those show­boats fall out.” Out of the heli­copter, that is:

In a style now famil­iar to many liv­ing beneath Baghdad’s skies, a Black­wa­ter sharp­shooter in khaki pants, with match­ing T-shirt and flak jacket, sat side­ways on the right side of each chop­per, lean­ing well out­side the craft. With their auto­matic weapons gripped for bat­tle, their feet planted on the helicopter’s metal skids, and only a slim strap secur­ing them to the craft, the men looked as if they were self-consciously re-creating the movies of Arnold Schwarzeneg­ger and Jean-Claude Van Damme.

Black­wa­ter defends its low-flying, ready-to-shoot pos­ture as a pow­er­ful deter­rent to attacks on Amer­i­can offi­cials being moved through the capital’s streets. But that pos­ture has become, to the company’s crit­ics, a hall­mark of its muscle-bound showi­ness.

…Con­trac­tors say the high pro­file of their armored con­voys, cou­pled with the covert nature of the insur­gents, places a pre­mium on high mobil­ity and rapid response — dri­ving at high speed and in a bul­ly­ing man­ner through city traf­fic and dri­ving on the wrong side of boule­vards and express­ways, always ready to resort instantly, at the first hint of threat, to heavy fire­power.

It is a for­mula fraught with poten­tial for error. To be over­taken on Baghdad’s air­port road by a pri­vate secu­rity con­voy dri­ving at 120 miles an hour, with con­trac­tors lean­ing out of win­dows or part-opened doors with lev­eled weapons, wav­ing their fists in a fran­tic pan­tomime, is a heart-stopping expe­ri­ence even for other West­ern­ers in armored cars with guards of their own. For ordi­nary Iraqis, with no weapons and no armor­ing, it can be pure ter­ror.

No shit. Never mind when they open fire on a car­load of civil­ians.

I guess the UAW didn’t learn from the Detroit news­pa­per strike: It’s unwise to strike an indus­try already on the ropes. But hey, they’ll give it a try. Maybe. This all comes with the news the state leg­is­la­ture has one week to get the lead out and put together a bud­get agree­ment that will keep state gov­ern­ment run­ning into the next fis­cal year. “Wouldn’t it be great to have a UAW strike and a gov­ern­ment shut­down at the same time?” Alan won­dered this morn­ing, a surly note in his voice. Sure. Our house has already lost 18 per­cent of its value since we’ve lived here; soon it’ll be like Mis­sis­sippi, only with more snow.

T-minus 12 min­utes to strike dead­line? Bet­ter hit pub­lish and hope for the best.

14 responses to
“Fatal distraction.”

  1. alex said on September 24th, 2007 at 10:11 am

    I pre­fer a stick for the same rea­sons, although don’t own one cur­rently. I learned to drive on big old GM cars with V8s and 4-barrel car­bu­re­tors and was quite reck­less (which is not to say wreck­less) when I was young. I’m lucky to be alive today.

    When I got my first car with a stick it made me a much bet­ter dri­ver because it required me to pay atten­tion to how fast I was going. Never had a cita­tion in a car with man­ual, and had quite a few cars with man­ual over the years. To any par­ent who has the jit­ters about a teen child dri­ving, I would rec­om­mend the kid be taught to drive a man­ual and not be allowed to drive any­thing else.

  2. Cathy D. said on September 24th, 2007 at 10:15 am

    I fol­lowed a guy down I-69 last week who had a cell phone pressed to his ear with one hand, was stretch­ing with the other, and chang­ing lanes in front of me to boot. I’m afraid of which appendage he was using to drive.

  3. LA mary said on September 24th, 2007 at 10:26 am

    I think at least once a day I have some huge SUV oper­ated by a per­son either tex­ting or talk­ing on the phone com­ing straight at me. This morn­ing I was sit­ting at a red light, and some­one in a Nav­i­ga­tor, mak­ing a left turn, nearly took off the cor­ner of my car. More often I’m in the park­ing garage here head­ing uphill, and com­ing down­hill is the SUV with the dis­tract­ing dri­ver, right in the mid­dle of the lane.

  4. colleen said on September 24th, 2007 at 10:41 am

    I CANNOT believe that tex­ting while dri­ving is even an issue, it is so com­pletely moronic. It never dawned on me to even con­sider it.

    The “Myth­busters” guys actu­ally did an exper­i­ment test­ing whether being on the cell phone or being tipsy was worse while dri­ving, and I THINK the cell phone, if it did not win, was tied with legally drunk as being an impair­ment.

    And I drive a stick too.

  5. John said on September 24th, 2007 at 10:51 am

    Cathy D., nice pic­ture at your blog. Your age and zodiac sign match mine so we must be within days of each other!

    As for crazy dri­vers, I see the same here on I-95 every­day. There is a half mile stretch near my office exit that must have idiot mag­nets on both side since the guard rails are down every week. I always blame the Rhode Island and Mass­a­chu­setts dri­vers going home from the casi­nos but I guess there are some local idiots too.

  6. LA mary said on September 24th, 2007 at 11:11 am

    My cur­rent car is the first auto­matic I’ve ever owned, and when I pass it on to my kid, I’m get­ting another stick shift. My right hand still gets twitchy going up or down hills, want­ing to down­shift.

    Isn’t that stuff about Black­wa­ter exactly how you imag­ined those guys to be? It’s a crappy action movie within what was sup­posed to be a crappy heroic war movie.

  7. alex said on September 24th, 2007 at 11:24 am

    So much for Hollywood’s lib­eral bias. They gave us “Wag the Dog” dur­ing the Clin­ton years; imag­ine the war epic/action thriller they could make out of the Bush years.

  8. Mindy said on September 24th, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    My husband’s 76-year-old uncle was was hit by a car in July while train­ing for his umpteenth Apple Cider Cen­tury.

    http://​www​.apple​cider​century​.com/​i​n​d​e​x.html

    The dri­ver had fallen asleep at the wheel and struck Uncle Dan head on. He endured daily surg­eries for a week and finally left the hos­pi­tal for a nurs­ing home three weeks ago. The active mem­bers of his entire fam­ily choose where to share the road very cau­tiously if they haven’t given up their road bikes entirely. I barely know the guy and am still very upset about his acci­dent.

  9. Julie Robinson said on September 24th, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Nancy, your home value may be plum­met­ing, but it could be worse; you could still be at the News-Sentinel in the good old Fort. The new press has been one dis­as­ter after the next and papers are late almost every day. Since hubby isn’t there any­more I no longer know (or care) about the nitty-gritty of it all, but I’ve heard just enough.

  10. nancy said on September 24th, 2007 at 2:46 pm

    So I’ve heard about the new press. You have to fig­ure they’ll get the kinks out even­tu­ally, but not a good start.

    I was always baf­fled why they needed a lav­ish new press, just at the dawn of the no-more-presses era, but then, you know what my opin­ion is worth.

  11. Dorothy said on September 24th, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    My hus­band got a new truck that’s a man­ual trans­mis­sion in June. I drive it occa­sion­ally, but even in my lit­tle Mal­ibu, I refuse to have the phone near me when I drive. It’s in my purse in the back seat. Only when I’m with another pas­sen­ger or another dri­ver will I have the phone within reach. Just not worth it!

  12. brian stouder said on September 25th, 2007 at 8:01 am

    You know, it might be fun to photo-shop a cell phone into Alan’s hands, in the photo with the approach­ing freighter (pre­sume­ably, he would be tex­ting “omg! ttfn!”)

  13. alex said on September 25th, 2007 at 8:23 am

    Note to Cathy, above…

    I vis­ited your site and would have responded there except I never cre­ate new blog IDs/passwords and all that yada yada because I already have too many pass­words to remem­ber.

    Any­way, I heartily agree about the arbi­trari­ness of place names given to new devel­op­ments. The exam­ples you cite are indeed about as tacky and phony as they get — with one big excep­tion.

    I grew up in Cedar Canyons. I recently moved back there. Cedar Creek, Cedar Creek Town­ship and Cedar Canyons all take their name from the first pio­neer inhab­i­tants who arrived in the 1830s, not some philis­tine real estate devel­oper.

    There once were dense stands of cedar there until farm­ers evis­cer­ated most of it. And as for the Canyons, while they’re not of the Cal­i­for­nia vari­ety, they are absolutely unchar­ac­ter­is­tic of the rest of Allen County. And mostly unknown. To see them you must walk deep into the Van­dolah Nature Pre­serve, which I sug­gest you do because it’s quite lovely. It looks like south­ern Indi­ana.

    It’s too bad more thought doesn’t go into nam­ing things around here. Another prime exam­ple is Oak Something-or-Other — such a noth­ing name I can’t remem­ber it even though I pass it every day — built on the site of the for­mer Robin­son Park, a nine­teenth cen­tury amuse­ment park that fig­ures sig­nif­i­cantly in local his­tory.

    Water­song. Eagle Creek. These are no doubt con­sumer focus-grouped and trade­marked names/logos that can be found in numer­ous Amer­i­can cities, not just Fort Wayne.

  14. brian stouder said on September 25th, 2007 at 9:57 am

    Well, I live in “Tower Heights” – and it IS high ground, and we DO have a tow­er­ing tower, loom­ing over heart and hearth­stone….