nancynall.com » We dabble in the arts.

We dabble in the arts.

On Sat­ur­day morn­ings, I take a class at the Detroit Film Cen­ter. Like most things in life, it’s not the des­ti­na­tion, it’s the jour­ney. Let’s take a quick tour.

The cen­ter recently relo­cated from the Wayne State area to the East­ern Mar­ket, where lots of artists are set­ting up in the ancient-but-cheap warehouse/loft space. The address is on the Chrysler Free­way ser­vice drive, which is con­fus­ing to some peo­ple. For­tu­nately, there’s a help­ful sand­wich board and, this being Detroit, a smear of graf­fiti (I think it says, “butout”):

sidewalk

But the Hol­ly­wood glam­our really starts when you step into, um, the…I guess you’d call it the foyer:

foyer

It’s a lot murkier than the pic­ture sug­gests. I think it would be an excel­lent set for a ser­ial killer’s lair. There’s another sand­wich board at the end of this pas­sage, which directs you to take a left turn, and please close the door behind you to save heat. Then you enter the glam­orous anteroom:

anteroom

The incred­i­bly steep stair­case is the next leg of your jour­ney. Last week I got there early and took a closer look at that pile of molder­ing banker’s boxes:

closed appeals

The one on top was labeled “closed appeals.” (Appar­ently there’s a lawyer’s office else­where in the build­ing.) A shame­less snoop, I plucked one out at ran­dom and started read­ing a very sad story about a man who loved mar­i­juana more than pay­ing child sup­port. Drama is all around us; all we have to do is look.

But at some point you have to ascend two floors at a sharp angle. I always take note of the chandelier:

chandelier

Every time I see it I reflect that if it were fea­tured in the New York Times Thurs­day Styles sec­tion, it would sell for $3,000. But keep climb­ing. Now you’re halfway there:

staircase

You’ll notice it starts to look sig­nif­i­cantly less grimy at this point. By the time you get to the top, it’s actu­ally pretty nice, in a shoestring-budget, kindness-of-strangers, scrabblin’-for-grants kind of way. And the view is great.

I’ll always remem­ber this place as the first time I ever heard actors read lines I’d writ­ten. We had audi­tions for our group project this week, although “group project” prob­a­bly makes a three-minute nar­ra­tive film sound a lit­tle grand. Not film, video. But it has a story, and two actors, and two loca­tions, and a script. Seven peo­ple answered our Craigslist ad, which promised only lunch in return for a day’s work. But this was the strange part — one cou­ple pre­sented them­selves as a pack­age deal, so we had them read together. They put a lot of energy into the lines, and it worked very well. Then the next guy came in, and played it just the oppo­site — very dry, very low-key, and it worked equally well.

We cast the first cou­ple, but told the other guy we wanted to keep him close, because the teacher wants the next class to write some­thing specif­i­cally for him. (Just like in Hol­ly­wood, only with no money or recog­ni­tion what­so­ever.) On just these Sat­ur­days, I’m get­ting a lit­tle of the news­room back — that sense of col­lab­o­ra­tion and teamwork.

Of course, pro­duc­tion isn’t until this week­end. I may feel very dif­fer­ently after that.

So, another busy morn­ing on not enough sleep. (Thank you, God, for cof­fee.) So short blog­gage today, but some:

Flash fun to be found here. Load and wait two sec­onds for the fun to start. If any­one reads Dutch, let me know what it says.

If you’re in a Super Tues­day state, tell us a lit­tle about E-Day where you are. An expe­ri­ence in col­lab­o­ra­tive cit­i­zen jour­nal­ism, eh?

Off to run six errands and make eight phone calls. Back eventually.

28 responses to
“We dabble in the arts.”

  1. ashley said on February 5th, 2008 at 8:52 am

    Tues­day will indeed be super. I want a coconut.

  2. MichaelG said on February 5th, 2008 at 9:18 am

    I mailed my vote in a week ago. I keep the bal­lot stub and post it out­side my cube as my “License to Complain”.

    Whadda you mean you can’t read Hema’s cute web site? The ghetto blaster is right there, just next to the con­fetti which is next to the feestvlagget­jes which is just above the feestballonnen.

  3. John said on February 5th, 2008 at 9:35 am

    No lines here in mid-suburban Con­necti­cut. But lots of cars and peo­ple com­ing and going in the ele­men­tary school park­ing lot. My precinct showed 38 votes (800 vot­ers in recent city coun­cil elec­tion) by 7:20 am. Zero cam­paign sig­nage out­side of school and no toad­ies pass­ing out litature. Most can­di­dates ignored Con­necti­cut dur­ing this pri­mary sea­son as it is seen as a safe blue state.

    Only reg­is­tered Repub­li­cans and Democ­rats are allowed to vote in Con­necti­cut. Over 50% of all vot­ers are listed as Inde­pen­dent. If reg­is­tered as an Inde­pen­dent, you are allowed to change affil­i­a­tion on the day of the pri­mary, but I can’t see a lot of peo­ple will­ing to take the time to do this.

  4. Dorothy said on February 5th, 2008 at 9:48 am

    If I were you I’d keep a work­ing flash­light in my pocket when enter­ing that build­ing. It looks cool, but be pre­pared “just in case.”

    I love going to audi­tions. It’s nerve-wracking but a thrill just the same. Wish I could do that stuff full time instead of what I do now.

  5. Danny said on February 5th, 2008 at 9:59 am

    I got my sam­ple bal­lot a few weeks ago and was look­ing at the polling address. It looked famil­iar. Turns out it is the address of somone we know: the fam­ily of the girl who used to rent next to us. The one who had the cops over her house about eight or nine times for vio­lence, theft and other drug related fun activities.

    The girl and her new ex-con boyfriend now live with mom at this res­i­dence. Not a big deal, but the mom and us are not on the great­est terms because we had a few of heated dis­cus­sions about the fact she thought we were mak­ing much ado about noth­ing. Despite all of the destruc­tion of prop­erty, yelling and scream­ing and drunken brawls. “Hey, weren’t you young once.” Why, yes. Yes we were, but our neigh­bors didn’t have to have the police on speed dial.

    Any­way, I think I will vote at the Reg­is­trar of Vot­ers today. Less chance of my bal­lot get­ting “lost.”

  6. Kirk said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Inter­est­ing, Danny. I don’t even know if pri­vate homes can be used as polling places in Ohio, but most of the time peo­ple here vote in schools, churches, fire houses, court houses and town­ship halls. I won­der how some­one goes about get­ting his/her home des­ig­nated a polling place.

  7. Jim in Fla said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:24 am

    In Cal­i­for­nia they put polls in people’s homes?

  8. Laura said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:30 am

    I don’t know about polls, but I’ve heard they put poles in people’s homes in CA.

  9. Jim in Fla said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:34 am

    I too was young once, but I never had a pole in my house. It would have been too hard to explain to Grandma.

  10. LAMary said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:43 am

    They do put polling places in homes in Cal­i­for­nia. I remem­ber vot­ing for Clin­ton the first time in a house with a chicken coop in the back yard. In LA.

    What do you need trans­lated from Dutch? The names of the items shown? My Dutch is very rusty but I can still read some.

  11. Danny said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:45 am

    My polling place has changed a few times over the years. Last few elec­tions were at a local school, but sev­eral peo­ple on my block have had their garages cleared out for vot­ing. If it’s at a pri­vate res­i­dence, it has always been the garage with the door wide open. Never in the liv­ing area of the home. That would be odd.

    I’m not sure about the restric­tions and reg­u­la­tions, but the Reg­is­trar of Vot­ers accepts appli­ca­tions for this.

  12. Jim in Fla said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Wow. I learned some­thing new today. Thx.

  13. Sue said on February 5th, 2008 at 10:55 am

    Holy Moly, Nancy, where are the build­ing and fire inspec­tors? That build­ing actu­ally has per­mis­sion for pub­lic occupancy?

  14. Danny said on February 5th, 2008 at 11:03 am

    The one thing I took note of in the pic­tures was that first stair­case. There is a handrail against the wall, but none on the out­side to pro­tect from a fall.

    I know in the D life is tough and this all adds to N Nall’s steet cred, but we get “safety” drilled into us a lot where I work.

  15. Julie Robinson said on February 5th, 2008 at 11:39 am

    I want some of those feestvlagget­jes. They are so darn cute I’m sure they would perk up my life. Was that store a Dan­ish com­peti­tor to IKEA? That’s the only place around here that sells such cool stuff. And we have to drive to Chicago. There’s no fun shop­ping here in the Fort.

  16. LAMary said on February 5th, 2008 at 11:49 am

    Dutch, not Danish.

  17. Julie Robinson said on February 5th, 2008 at 12:04 pm

    Whoops, wasn’t read­ing care­fully! But we still don’t have any­thing like that within 100 miles.

  18. MichaelG said on February 5th, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    I’ve voted at people’s homes many times in Cal­i­for­nia and as Danny says, it’s always been in the garage with the door(s) open. And the res­i­dents have no access to any­thing so, Danny, you can feel safe vot­ing at your old antagonist’s place. You prob­a­bly knew that.

    There’s no way that DFC stair­way meets basic code or ADA require­ments from any per­spec­tive: treads and ris­ers, rail­ings, lack of land­ings, nut­tin. I can’t imag­ine an insur­ance com­pany cov­er­ing that death trap.

  19. Connie said on February 5th, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    I don’t see any pic­ture or link to pic­ture, but obvi­ously the rest of you do. Gotta wonder.

  20. nancy said on February 5th, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    I believe some his­toric build­ings can get exempted from some ADA require­ments if they have alter­na­tive routes to the top, and there is a freight ele­va­tor. As for “death trap” — eh. Life is a ter­mi­nal dis­ease. As long as no one’s smok­ing and the wiring was installed by non-morons, I’ll take the risk.

  21. ashley said on February 5th, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Yeah, we had a Super Tues­day, but since this is the biggest hol­i­day of the year, you hea­thens can vote today — we moved the elec­tion to Saturday.

  22. Sue said on February 5th, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    Nancy, you men­tioned that the wiring had to be installed by non-morons. Take a closer look at the chandelier.

  23. jcburns said on February 5th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    ‘laden 100%’ –uh, I think that means ‘Load­ing 100%’…

  24. Danny said on February 5th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Ash, usu­ally one would snidely com­ment “Hey, at least your pri­or­i­ties are straight,” but given the fiasco that con­tin­ues in terms of the rebuild­ing effort and lit­tle sup­port from the Feds, I’d say you DO have your pri­or­i­ties straight.

    Party on, Wayne. Party on, Garth.

    On another note. Have any of you been fol­low­ing the story of these mas­sive under­sea inter­net trans­mis­sion lines that are get­ting cut in the Mid­dle East? Odd. I am typ­i­cally not a con­spir­acy guy, but some­thing doesn’t smell right here. It is prob­a­bly just a coin­ci­dence, but I was also think­ing about the elec­tions today and all of the hub-bub in recent years about the (in)security of elec­tronic vot­ing and it just briefly crossed my mind that what if the two things were related.

    Not enough for a fea­ture movie there, but maybe enough for part of a plot line on sev­eral episodes of 24.

  25. MichaelG said on February 5th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Oh, don’t get me wrong here, Nance. I’m not being cen­so­ri­ous. I’ve cer­tainly hung out in worse places. Still do. I was just observ­ing. There are some excep­tions in his­toric build­ings for some ADA require­ments. There are vari­ables such as the bldg itself, its usage, the type of short­com­ing and the degree of ren­o­va­tion that is being under­taken. I also have no idea what Michi­gan or Detroit or local county codes require. In my coun­try, that stair­way would need work.

  26. brian stouder said on February 5th, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    A com­ment from the cheap seats, here in May-primary Indi­ana (we may be late and irrelevant…but still valid, which beats Michigan’s and Florida’s early, tainted, and poten­tially anti-democratic trainwrecks-in-progress)

    After today, both Sen­a­tor Clinton’s and Obama’s real­is­tic chances to win the nom­i­na­tion will STILL be alive, and this begins to raise the pos­si­bil­ity of a really destruc­tive pri­mary battle…WJC has already shown his unflinch­ing will­ing­ness to play that game…and indeed, 2008 is prob­a­bly HRC’s only chance at the brass ring (espe­cially if another Demo­c­rat wins the White House in 2008, tying up the D race for that place until 2016), whereas Obama almost cer­tainly has at least one more major run at the White House in him, even if he has to wait all the way until 2016 and the end of a sec­ond HRC term in office.

    There­fore, if it comes right down to a slash-and-burn fight to the fin­ish, or a grace­ful exit, I think Obama is more likely to choose the lat­ter, IF his trend-lines turn decidely south. But if Obama gets the upper-hand — mean­ing — a win in Cal­i­for­nia and a win in New Jer­sey (regard­less of the close­ness of the del­e­gate counts in these pro­por­tional con­tests), going for­ward from Tues­day — I think HRC/WJC might see NO real down-side to play­ing every last card they have.…which could lead to a gen­uinely dis­ap­point­ing anti-climax to this oth­er­wise uplift­ing exer­cise in democracy

    Regard­ing Super Tues­day, this site offers an up-to-date buf­fet of polls (all ‘name-brand’ sur­veys) for every state

    http://​www​.usa​elec​tion​polls​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​s​t​a​t​e​-​p​o​l​l​s.html

    which may not mean any­thing at all*, but which are fun to look at (like read­ing the National Enquirer head­line while you’re in line at the supermarket)

    So as the sun sets, my Tos­tito scoops and fresh-made gua­camole and icy cold Diet Coke await

    *the poll num­bers vary so wildly — espe­cially in Cal­i­for­nia — as to make them all noth­ing more than talk­ing points. One won­ders when the big expose’ of how polling com­pa­nies make their money will come out)

  27. paddyo' said on February 5th, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    Here in the host city for the Dems’ con­ven­tion this sum­mer, there are no lines because there’s no bal­lot­ing, per se:
    Col­oradans are cau­cus­ing at 7 p.m. Moun­tain Time (The Time Zone That Time For­got And Decades Can­not Improve) in homes, schools, etc.

    As a recov­er­ing news­pa­per jour­nal­ist, I’m cau­cus­ing tonight for the first time since curios­ity in ’92 led me around the block to an across-the-alley neighbor’s living-room meeting.

    (There was a bit of a row last week over the two com­pet­ing daily papers’ restric­tions here on staffers going to cau­cuses. The Rocky Moun­tain News described them as party orga­niz­ing ses­sions and for­bade all edi­to­r­ial staff from attend­ing, while The Den­ver Post restricted most on the News side, dis­cour­aged the rest but said it couldn’t stop peo­ple. Gee, ain’t cit­i­zen par­tic­i­pa­tion grand?)

    Any­way, inter­est in Clinton-Obama is so high that the Den­ver Dems are pre­dict­ing HALF the city’s 95,000 or so reg­is­tered Democ­rats will attend their cau­cuses, some­thing absolutely unheard of. For­rest Whit­taker came to town the other day to help Obama-ites prac­tice how to run and par­tic­i­pate in their cau­cuses — and yeah, to sign a few autographers.

    The robo-calls from Obama (I’ve had a few the past week from both him and Hillary) list the start­ing time at 6:30 p.m. in antic­i­pa­tion of giant confuso-cluster-jams at the doors, since the cau­cuses close doors and start promptly at 7.

  28. Mitch Harper said on February 7th, 2008 at 10:02 am

    East­ern Mar­ket is now headed by Dan Car­mody, imme­di­ate past direc­tor of Fort Wayne’s Down­town Improve­ment District.