nancynall.com » Get you six mo’.

Get you six mo’.

Every state has its self-flattering mythol­ogy, but Texas’ is one of the worst. HT: Virgotex.

34 responses to
“Get you six mo’.”

  1. brian stouder said on June 17th, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    Well, in the inter­ests of equal-time buf­foon­ery, what the hell was Gov­er­nor Granholm doing last night, in Detroit?

    If there isn’t a YouTube yet, there will be — but the Cana­dian seemed to be pretty much came uncorked and seemed to be going all Kruschev on the audi­ence, when she referred to Sen­a­tor Clin­ton, and took her shoe off and waved it??!!

    edit — here’s a still, but it’s gotta be YouTubed somewhere

    http://​www​.newser​.com/​i​m​a​g​e​/​113013 – 6-20080617032747.image

    She was giv­ing an impas­sioned speech.…almost angry, really (and indeed that suits the chal­lenges fac­ing our region of the nation, just now. Still, it was some­what off-key, I thought, for Obama’s rally)

    edit 2: maybe Granholm’s rant encap­su­lates Michigan’s ‘mad as hell and ain’t gonna take it any­more’ mythol­ogy, as opposed to texas’ self-flattering brand

  2. LAMary said on June 17th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    I don’t have sound here at work, so I only got the visu­als. Please tell me the sound didn’t make it even more bullshitty.

  3. derwood said on June 17th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    But, he’s doing the Lord’s work for Texas.

    Gack.

    daron

    I caught the shoe wav­ing moment but hadn’t been lis­ten­ing in prior. Strange.

  4. Kirk said on June 17th, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    That’s the kind of super­fi­cial horse­shit that this coun­try runs on.

  5. nancy said on June 17th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    Mary, the sound and the video are evenly matched for bullshittery.

    Missed Jenny’s shoe act. Maybe she was doing one of those Iraqi beat-on-the-statue things.

  6. Danny said on June 17th, 2008 at 2:16 pm

    OK, as Brian said. Equal time and all that rot.

    It’s now mak­ing the air­wave rounds about the Obama cam­paign staff and con­gress folks involved in the Coun­try­wide Mort­gage sweetheat-deal scan­dal. Obama has been run­ning as the pris­tine, above-scandal-and-influence out­sider while crit­i­ciz­ing the sub-prime mort­gage lend­ing fiasco pretty heavily.

    Stay tuned.

  7. James said on June 17th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    I can’t wait till he’s dis­cov­ered a rub­bin’ shoes with some guy in an out-of-state bathroom.

    Big John.

    Big bad John.

    Big bad gay John.

  8. coozledad said on June 17th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    “Ya see, I’m from Texas where we do things quick. I’ve got to see a spe­cial­ist about my…
    Big John”

  9. MichaelG said on June 17th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    I can’t play the sound here either, Mary, but I can hear the stir­ring music and the deep, manly voice anyway.

    I vis­ited the Alamo once (it’s right in the mid­dle of town) and dis­cov­ered that it’s not a his­toric build­ing, mon­u­ment, museum, pre­serve or such. Nope. It is a Texas State Shrine.
    Says so right on the plaque.

  10. Jolene said on June 17th, 2008 at 3:52 pm

    Good lord.

  11. colleen said on June 17th, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Gack. that reminds me of the video they use behind the star span­gled ban­ner at my husband’s work functions.

  12. coozledad said on June 17th, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    I didn’t watch it all the way through. Does his fey ass wind up in the bot­tom of a mine?

  13. Jolene said on June 17th, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    Here’s a lit­tle some­thing else from the Texas GOP con­ven­tion. Am sure sorry I didn’t get my tick­ets in time.

  14. brian stouder said on June 17th, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    Pam and I vis­ited Texas a year and a half ago; it is def­i­nitely a self-conciously unique place. We vis­ited the bat­tle­ship USS Texas (BB-35), which looms over the San Jac­into bat­tle­field (both the bat­tle­ship and the park are admin­is­tered by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department!).

    Picked up and read a book called “18 min­utes”, about the war for Texas inde­pen­dence, and I was taken aback at how bru­tally remorse­less that short war was. Santa Anna ordered the exe­cu­tion of all the com­bat­ants who sur­ren­dered at the Alamo, and then, when another part of the Texan army (under Fan­nin) sur­ren­dered at Goliad — the Mex­i­can com­man­der there didn’t want to slaugh­ter them; but direct orders to exe­cute them all came from Santa Anna, and it was done.

    http://​www​.tsl​.state​.tx​.us/​t​r​e​a​s​u​r​e​s​/​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​/​g​o​l​i​a​d​/​g​o​l​i​a​d.html

    A few lucky men man­aged to escape from the slaugh­ter, as it became clear what was hap­pen­ing, and even­tu­ally made it back to Houston’s small army, and fought at San Jacinto.

    The bat­tle lasted 18 min­utes, and the Mex­i­can army was routed.…but the killing con­tin­ued for sev­eral hours. The Tex­ans weren’t tak­ing any pris­on­ers (Santa Anna him­self was cap­tured a few days later, and nego­ti­ated the end of the war)

    It is as if the bru­tal his­tory of Texas, from the for­ma­tive days of its youth deformed the con­cious­ness of the place, forever

  15. Yvette said on June 17th, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    I lived in Texas (Dal­las and Austin) for a com­bined 7 years. Was called the N-word for the sec­ond (and last, so far) time in my life in Dal­las in 1986.

    First was in Hobart, Ind. in 1984. ‘Nuff said.

    These but­tons are a pathetic way to make money. And there IS that free­dom of speech thing. But the RNC should have put up a big sign saying:

    THIS VENDOR HAS THE RIGHT TO SELL THIS CRAP. WE DON’T HAVE TO LIKE IT.

  16. Sue said on June 17th, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    Coo­zledad, you’ve done it again.
    And Texas has always scared me, even before our cur­rent pres­i­dent. I think I would only visit if Lyle Lovett would agree to stay right next to me at all times and explain things (“that’s right, you’re not from Texas”…).

  17. alex said on June 17th, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    The Texas female dress code, with its big blond hair and What­ever Hap­pened to Baby Jane makeup, stands in quite a con­trast to the more flat­ter­ing basic black favored by the Islamofascists.

  18. nancy said on June 17th, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    The Freep on the guv’s shoe gambit:

    The crowd booed when Granholm said the name of Sen. Hillary Clin­ton, Obama’s rival dur­ing the pri­maries, whom she sup­ported until she dropped out of the race this month.

    Tak­ing off a navy blue pump and wav­ing it aloft, she said, “These high heels have car­ried a lot of weight for first women every­where. But I’m proud to say that I’m sup­port­ing Barack Obama to be the next pres­i­dent of the United States.”

  19. LAMary said on June 17th, 2008 at 6:44 pm

    Oh. I see. She loans her shoes to other women in politics.

  20. brian stouder said on June 17th, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    She’d a’ done bet­ter if she had on boots, and did a riff on “These boots were made for walkin’ and that’s just what they’ll do”, etc, ala Weeds (the best thing about that show is the opening)

  21. joodyb said on June 17th, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Shoe Power! Seri­ously, was that all she could come up with? or did i miss some inside base­ball?
    Did any­one look at the DMN com­ments about the but­ton (which also made Salon​.com today)? some­one raised the pho­to­shop issue; another asked if any­one had called the Texas GOP for pub­lic com­ment. these are at the very least valid ques­tions. why didn’t we hear or see it before w/all the media there? i’m even more sus­pi­cious now: all the pix of the but­ton scat­tered hither and blog are the exact same one. …

    ION, did any­one see the baby mama thing last week on Fox? that michele malkin is one crazy chick, man.

  22. Crabby said on June 17th, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    This is a cool pic of the rally, you can pan up, down & 360 around.

    Cool freep pic

  23. Joe K said on June 17th, 2008 at 10:42 pm

    As a GREAT singer,song writer from Texas,
    by the name of Ray Wylie Hub­bard says in one of his best songs,
    SCREW YOU, were from Texas.
    SCREW YOU, were from Texas
    SCREW YOU, were from Texas
    Were from Texas so SCREW YOU.
    It’s a great bluesy type song.
    Ray Wylie Hub­bard also wrote Up against the wall red neck moth­ers.
    Laugh­ing at life,
    pilot Joe

  24. brian stouder said on June 18th, 2008 at 12:28 am

    Did any­one look at the DMN com­ments about the but­ton (which also made Salon​.com today)?

    joodyb — I went in search of ‘the but­ton’, and I didn’t know what ‘DMN com­ments’ meant, but I went to Salon​.com and tripped across alink to this excel­lent (and entirely enter­tain­ing) arti­cle New Yorker arti­cle on Olber­mann uber allis

    http://​www​.newyorker​.com/​r​e​p​o​r​t​i​n​g​/​2​0​0​8​/​0​6​/​2​3​/​0​8​0​6​2​3​f​a​_​f​a​c​t​_​b​o​y​e​r​?​c​u​r​r​e​n​t​P​a​ge=all

    Some of the inter­est­ing tid­bits in there include

    He has been given a diag­no­sis of Wittmaack-Ekbom’s syn­drome, also known as “restless-legs syn­drome” (and also “the kicks,” “Jimmy legs,” and “jit­ters”), a neu­ro­log­i­cal dis­or­der that pro­duces a prick­ling, itch­ing, or crawl­ing feel­ing in the legs, pro­foundly dis­turb­ing sleep. Reclin­ing exac­er­bates the con­di­tion, so Olber­mann got out of bed, took a pill for the ail­ment, and, while wait­ing for the drug to kick in, scrolled through his Black­Berry, scan­ning recent mes­sages. One arrested his atten­tion. It was a link to the Web site Politico, which fea­tured an inter­view con­ducted that day with Pres­i­dent Bush. Olber­mann was struck by two ques­tions from the inter­view, and by Bush’s answers to them

    at which time he dashes off his 18 page jere­miad and then e-mailed it (at 3am) to his pro­duc­ers, for a “Spe­cial Com­ment” that aired in the next Count­down broadcast!

    the piece goes on to show the the immense amount of hubris and con­ceit that is at the core of the guy.…and takes a glance at how cable lip-flappers like O’Reilly and him feed off one another, and also sub­tly (and not so sub­tly) sway the “real” news oper­a­tions of their respec­tive employers.

    Thanks joodyb!!

  25. Gasman said on June 18th, 2008 at 12:35 am

    Ah, the bull­shit still runs wide and deep down in the heart of Texas. I did 14 years down in the Lone Star State, so I’m very famil­iar with the “you ain’t shit if you ain’t from Texas” atti­tude that was palpable.

    They have an impres­sive tra­di­tion of idiot gov­er­nors — “Good Hair” Perry and his pre­de­ces­sor Bush, come to mind — and it looks like they’re expand­ing it to include Sen­a­tors. We had already fled the state by the time Cronyn was elected, so I had noth­ing to do with it.

    How about that jacket in the video? He looks like he was audi­tion­ing for a part in the sequel to Broke­back Moun­tain. Texas is no place for ladies, queers, or lib­er­als. Cronyn would prob­a­bly say they’re all the same.

    Drink­ing and dri­ving was legal in Texas in the mid 80’s, but the blue laws said that you couldn’t buy a Bible on Sun­day. That’s Texas style logic for ya’.

    Remem­ber the words of Gen­eral Phil Sheri­dan: “If I owned Hell and Texas I would rent out Texas and live in Hell.”

    He clearly rec­og­nized the true glory of Texas.

  26. Terry WAlter said on June 18th, 2008 at 1:40 am

    Here in the Fort,there is a Texas Road­house restau­rant. When the wait­ress came around, I asked her if she had ever been to Texas. This was my lead-in to a dia­tribe about what the eff do those peo­ple think they’ve got to brag about. Her reply,” oh, I’m FROM Texas”. Well, not want­ing to act like a Texan, this just led to some small talk about the old home. Nice girl, must be the bet­ter ones plan their escape.

  27. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 18th, 2008 at 9:44 am

    Sen. Cornyn — you need a bucket of irony mixed in with yer feed trough, ‘cuz you ain’t get­tin’ enuf in yer diet.

    Plus some roughage. Yer a bit backed up, too.

  28. del said on June 18th, 2008 at 11:00 am

    Thanks for the link to the New Yorker arti­cle about Olber­mann. Though there are sim­i­lar­i­ties between O’Reilly and Olber­mann it’s a mis­take to equate the two. Olbermann’s been jus­ti­fi­ably mad as hell about a mis­lead­ing pres­i­dent and a press corps com­prised almost entirely of lem­mings; what’s O’Reilly ever been jus­ti­fi­ably mad about? Immi­grants? Gay mar­riage? “Happy Holidays?”

  29. del said on June 18th, 2008 at 11:36 am

    I read the New Yorker piece on Olber­mann. You have to love any­body who got so sick of the Mon­ica Lewin­sky affair being high­lighted every-day-for-months that he almost refused to go on air for the show “White House in Cri­sis” to decon­struct it. Anger can be a good thing too. Charles Dick­ens wrote about the virtue of hav­ing “a heart that never hard­ens, and a tem­per that never tires …”

  30. brian stouder said on June 18th, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Olbermann’s been jus­ti­fi­ably mad as hell about a mis­lead­ing pres­i­dent and a press corps com­prised almost entirely of lemmings

    True enough — but as the piece points out, he’s been mad as hell since the 5th grade!! — about EVERYTHING!!

    It WAS a rev­e­la­tion to me that he almost got the CBS news gig. That sort of explains his hos­til­ity toward Couric. (and speak­ing of hot women on TV, it was also news to me that he dated Laura Ingra­ham back in the day…although his ungal­lant remarks about her were no sur­prise at all)

  31. del said on June 18th, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    I saw her ungal­lant remarks about him (some­thing about call­ing in a med­ical team for him) but what were his ungal­lant remarks about her?
    On a related note, I’m always amazed at the hot­ness fac­tor of some of the cable TV news women. (Not so much with the men.) CNN’s got this lovely con­ser­v­a­tive black female polit­i­cal pun­dit whose eyes are goo­gly like she’s downed some bel­ladonna … and then she opens her mouth and sounds like a Chi Omega soror­ity girl.
    Reminds me of the por­trait of Kramer on Sein­feld about which the art patron remarked, “It is repul­sive … and yet … I can­not avert my gaze.”

  32. del said on June 18th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    I just looked at the arti­cle again and, not to be too picky but I didn’t see any­thing in it about Olber­mann being mad at every­thing since 5th grade — though he did skip a grade and was unath­letic and got beat up some.

  33. brian stouder said on June 18th, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    Well, del, I guess rea­son­able peo­ple can dis­agree rea­son­ably. This pas­sage seems to be where I inferred “mad at every­thing since 5th grade” — which you do not see; and where you inferred that he “got beat up some”, which I don’t see.

    (empha­sis added)

    He also had the rep­u­ta­tion, even among those who admired his tal­ents, of being some­what dif­fi­cult. Grow­ing up in sub­ur­ban Hastings-on-Hudson, in Westch­ester County, he was the sort of kid who, when his par­ents thought psy­cho­log­i­cal test­ing was in order, responded to the Rorschach test by say­ing, “It looks like an inkblot.” Advised that Keith might be bet­ter served by a pri­vate edu­ca­tion, his par­ents — Theodore, a com­mer­cial archi­tect, and Marie, a preschool teacher — enrolled him at the Hack­ley School, in Tar­ry­town. It wasn’t an easy adjust­ment; Keith had skipped a grade and was younger than any­one else in his class, and he wasn’t a jock. But he was a good stu­dent, and the school’s radio sta­tion became his home. Olber­mann worked as a sports stringer in col­lege, at Cor­nell, and when he grad­u­ated, in 1979, he went directly to a sports­cast­ing job at UPI radio in New York.

    Other parts of the arti­cle point out how he got him­self fired with some reg­u­lar­ity, and how he burned bridges (or “napalmed” them, as an ESPN col­league said!) when­ever he left one place to go to another; and indeed the piece ends with his cur­rent boss com­par­ing him to a jerk of a boyfriend that the women in his audi­ence have to live with, since they have “no place else to go”.…which sounds wrong enough that one almost won­ders if Kieth-O might have knocked a seri­ous crack into his viewr­ship base.

    But in any case, I find the guy more enter­tain­ing than not, and watch him at least a time or two each week.…although to be hon­est, my pro-Obama bias made me very much hap­pier with Kieth-O, in recent months. Nowa­days I’ve turned the wick down on the day-to-day pol­i­tics fix (we’ve got all sum­mer and fall for this steady accu­mu­la­tion of crap, right? Wake me up at the end of September)

  34. del said on June 19th, 2008 at 9:15 am

    I love it that Keith said that the Rorschach blot looked like and inkblot. Maybe that’s being dif­fi­cult or maybe that’s just step­ping out­side of the box and telling the truth — I think my Psych 101 text referred to that as an “Ein­stel­lung.” (Will check Wiki) Same goes for his with­er­ing exit inter­view; most lem­mings diplo­mat­i­cally offer mea­sured feed­back with an eye toward future needs; not too many to tell the ter­ri­ble truth to power. More power to him, I say. Though life is dif­fi­cult for folks who don’t com­pro­mise their integrity. Also, Keith said in the arti­cle: “This is an old school­yard thing I learned from being repeat­edly beat up in the fourth grade.” I don’t agree with every­thing the guy says but I cer­tainly do respect him.