nancynall.com » What a weasel wants.

What a weasel wants.

Carny art.

32 responses to
“What a weasel wants.”

  1. Gasman said on August 29th, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    Nancy,
    Is this from that Burger King cam­paign?

  2. LA Mary said on August 29th, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    Were you inspired to post this by this image:

    http://www.zieak.com/…/2008/04/sarahpalincrop.jpg

  3. brian stouder said on August 29th, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    Mary – now THAT’S my kind of stat­u­ary!

  4. LA Mary said on August 29th, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    Hmm, were you see­ing the photo of Sarah Palin with the furry thing around her shoul­ders?

  5. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    I believe that’s about John McCain. I find it excep­tion­ally dif­fi­cult to believe women would vote for some ahole that called his wife a c#@nt, instead of the pick­aninny. That is the char­ac­ter­i­za­tion the ahole chose in both cases. This is Rov­ian. What­ever it takes.

    If you had brains, the alleged Tem­ple is actu­ally more like a the­ater, but, you know, what the hey, we can lie one way or another. W had columns in the back­ground. Pat Buchanon says the VP nom­i­nee is a beauty queen.

    Andrea Mitchell says John McCain is a for­eign pol­icy guru. Appar­ently she didn’t get the deal on Geor­gia. Moron. Is she not a fuck­ing moron? Holy crap?

  6. brian stouder said on August 29th, 2008 at 5:23 pm

    were you see­ing the photo of Sarah Palin with the furry thing around her shoul­ders?

    Nope. I was see­ing (in what I now under­stand was just a ban­ner ad!) a statue located some­where in Cam­bo­dia, of a nude female (with party hats!) who seems to be explor­ing her wom­an­hood.

    Going back there now, the happy stone god­dess is gone, and there is a much more pro­saic ad, and the con­tent part of the site says “error 404″.

    But – it was good stuff for a minute there!

  7. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on August 29th, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    Try this link –
    http://​www​.zieak​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​8​/​2​9​/​s​a​r​a​h​-​p​a​l​i​n​-​a​s​-​v​i​c​e​-​p​r​e​s​i​d​e​n​t​/​#​c​o​m​m​e​n​t-6021

    There’s your weasel! A dead one, any­how.

    I get the impres­sion she has a healthy, well devel­oped sense of irony, which i hope they fig­ure out how to keep in play and not hide in the blind trust can­di­dates seems to put their sense of humor into.

    Quiz ques­tion — what state shares a bor­der with Rus­sia? Yep.

    McCain-Palin: We Accept The Sup­port of SCA Mem­bers!

  8. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on August 29th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    Nice quotes from an Alaskan with cropped photo lost from ear­lier link –
    http://​www​.zieak​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​4​/​1​0​/​s​a​r​a​h​-​p​a​l​i​n​-​i​s​-​a​-​g​o​o​d​-​r​e​p​u​b​lican/

    LAMary, i owe you a drink for point­ing me to that site; another reminder of how this lady is a great choice for the ticket.

  9. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 5:51 pm

    Sorry, I think she’s a joke. I think McCa­daver is Bush warmed over. Nobody needs this shit any­more.

    I thought in 2004 that my fel­low Amer­i­cans couldn’t pos­si­bly be that stu­pid. I knew for a fact Ken­neth Black­well would steal votes in Cuya­hoga County. Why that ass­hole isn’t in jail, well that’s bey­omd me.

  10. MichaelG said on August 29th, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    Of course she’s not qual­i­fied. But I wouldn’t sneer too much. Wait until they fin­ish pack­ag­ing her. “I’m pro-choice. I chose to have my Down Syn­drome baby” After think­ing a lit­tle about it, I still agree Palin is a cyn­i­cal choice but I’d never sell Rove and the Repub­li­can slime machine short. How­ever, I don’t think they’re going after the Hillary hold outs. Their track record shows that they chase elec­toral votes and they have a demo­graphic in par­tic­u­lar states they are chas­ing. Maybe I’m over think­ing it but I’m going to worry until the morn­ing of Novem­ber 5 and I see Obama’s name on top.

  11. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on August 29th, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    I learn that Palin is a mem­ber of the Assem­blies of God, which is (cue omi­nous thunder-rumble) the church John Ashcroft is a lay min­is­ter in. Think Pentecostal-lite, not that the AGs i know would appre­ci­ate the short­hand. (They call them­selves AGs, noth­ing to do with their famous son who was Bush’s first AG.)

    Michael, is it slime, or are there actu­ally lots of peo­ple who worry about abor­tion with­out even won­der­ing what Karl Rrrrrrove thinks? And maybe McCain wants their votes, and wants them to know he sup­ports their per­spec­tive.

    And if you’re pro-choice, you get clar­ity like with no other veep he coulda tapped (see entry under Rom­ney, flip-flops). No smoke blown, no slime, just a . . . [koff] choice. You’ll vote for Obama, not against Palin. And i’m not vot­ing against Obama, but i know most of my col­leagues in church and social work cir­cles and y’all here will insist that’s what i did.

    McCain-Palin: Not Exactly Hid­ing Their Posi­tions On Any­thing

  12. Gasman said on August 29th, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Yet more McCain hypocrisy. If Obama didn’t have enough expe­ri­ence to be Com­man­der In Chief, how does Gov. Palin? McCain is still run­ning the “He’s too inex­pe­ri­enced” ad here in New Mex­ico. So Obama is too inex­pe­ri­enced and elit­ist. Hmm.

  13. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

    World Assem­blies of God Fel­low­ship is a cult. I say this as mem­ber of what the Repub­li­can Party has called a “demonic cult”. You know, Catholics. I thought it would be hilar­i­ous if McCain chose the Holy Under­pants. This woman believes every crim­i­nal has a right to an AK until some jack-booted thug from ATF pries it from her cold dead hands. She is Jeanne Schmidt, but bet­ter look­ing, or at least not zomb­i­fied.

    The insult to women’s intel­li­gence in gen­eral goes right along with the troglodyte’s com­ment on his own wife, how­ever cor­rect he may have been.

  14. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    But you know, the baby mur­derer, drill, drill, drill female vote is prob­a­bly huge. These peo­ple also think home school­ing is peachy keen. And the Con­sti­tu­tion is fly­pa­per we need to get rid of, because it doesn’t really let moral arbiters like her and W screw your lives over.

    And guess what. She sup­ported the Bridge to Nowhere in 2006 before she thought it wasn’t such a good idea. How’s that ofr mov­ing out from under the Feds?. Oh, and she said Hillary Clin­ton was an “insuf­fer­able whiner”. That ought to go over big time with dis­af­fected vot­ers. No joke, she is Camille Paglia with a lobot­omy. But, you know, W knows Alaska is right next to Rus­sia.

  15. Dexter said on August 29th, 2008 at 8:38 pm

    I won’t vote for her but I damn sure would …never mind…but she was selected pre­cisely to nab the Party Unity My Ass PUMAS.
    Karl Rove told Lieber­man to take a hike…disappear, two days ago. This is Rove’s cam­paign, you bet­ter believe it.
    I thought Rom­ney would emerge, then it looked more like Pawlenty…but then Rove springs this one on us.
    Promises are float­ing that they won’t diss her like the party dissed poor old dumb-fuck Dan Quayle.
    This pick is sim­i­lar in the “what the hell?” depart­ment; has any­body seen Quayle weigh­ing in with com­ment? No? Didn’t think so.

  16. basset said on August 29th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    I would too, Dex­ter. Michelle Obama… naaah. Too per­fect, too brit­tle, too… Republican-looking.

    what’s Quayle doing now, any­one know?

  17. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Vot­ers are spec­tac­u­larly stu­pid. Peo­ple believe W served in the Texas National Guard, even though he was crim­i­nally AWOL. And peo­ple believe John Kerry some­how staged get­ting shot and pulling his buddy out of the Mekong. What I’d like to know is what the hell is wrong with peo­ple?

    You know what fueled the Repub­li­can vit­riol against Kerry? He exposed the patron saint when he inves­ti­gated the patron saint:

    http://​dir​.salon​.com/​s​t​o​r​y​/​n​e​w​s​/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​/​2​0​0​4​/​1​0​/​2​5​/​c​ontra/

    I believe Cheney was involved in that too. These peo­ple are sorry excuses for actual peo­ple. Lee Atwa­ter took it all back when he was dying.

  18. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    What the hell does it mean when it’s a jest to say some psy­chopath like Karl Rove is con­trol­ling elec­tions? I guess if you’re the moral equiv­a­lent of Enron, that’s all prob­a­bly fine. Oil com­pany exec­u­tives eat salade nicoise with VP Elmer Fudd, and they take home 35 times the cash that rig work­ers clear. I’m sure they all get a big kick out of that, but I’d like to see the oil rig guys beat shit out of the Repub­li­cans..

  19. coozledad said on August 29th, 2008 at 9:08 pm

    Cal­iban: I’ve learned today that Repub­li­cans are unashamedly pro-torture and, as the FDIC spi­rals into insol­vency, we need to make sure the fed­eral gov­ern­ment gets behind the home­schooler notion that God him­self hand­crafted GW Bush from… a heav­enly stool? I’ve also learned it was a good thing we “won” the Iraq war for the Chi­nese. What a day.
    I’m going to go reg­is­ter some peo­ple to vote tomor­row who have ben­e­fited from the Bush admin­is­tra­tion so much they’re suf­fer­ing from ennui, and want to see Repub­li­cans rot in jails.

  20. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 9:26 pm

    The surge is fas­ci­nat­ing. What it actu­ally was is mon­ster cash to war­lords and Shia mili­tias choos­ing not to fight, and US will aban­don those guys like stink remov­ing from shit, and all hell will break out. That’s McCain’s wis­dom.

    McBane was slan­dered by Karl Rove in South Car­olina in 20000. Appar­ently, he thinks those tac­tics are per­fectly fine when Demo­c­ra­tic can­di­dates are tar­gets. Mav­er­ick? Horse­shit. High road cam­paign­ing? He’s a scum­bag that was fine with Swift Boat. What a hero.

  21. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 9:35 pm

    Coo­zle: Did you know that the infa­mous SKM never said a word to his cap­tors until it was proved to him that his fam­ily was in the same boat he was? If Amer­i­cans really wanted to track down the 911 mur­der­ers, tor­tur­ing the Saudi royal fam­ily might have been more effec­tive. Fact is, top-down, these peo­ple are war crim­i­nals.

  22. coozledad said on August 29th, 2008 at 9:51 pm

    They’re not just war crim­i­nals, they’re us. And they def­i­nitely don’t give a fly­ing fuck about peo­ple who are fight­ing to pre­serve their right to shoot whichever human is handy when the meth jit­ters git em, eat white bread, or restrict Mex­i­cans to high­way labor. They just see every­thing in terms of the flow of money, and how best to free that up. Some­times you have to use a rube. Some­times you have to own a shit­sack parad­ing around as a cow­boy. But a lot of the time, you just sit back and watch while the whole fuck­ing Potemkin vil­lage falls down.

  23. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Do you sup­port aholes with am agenda that tor­ture peo­ple and claim it’s to pro­tect you? Do peo­ple under­stand the fact that the New Amer­i­can Cen­tu­ri­ons tried to talk Clin­ton into this shit, but he refused to have any­thing to do with it? There really is no excuse for immoral behav­ior, no mat­ter what some tor­tured legal­is­tic piece of shit like John Yoo might fab­ri­cate. That’s the kind of legal advice you get when you rely on Fundy diploma mills.

    But hey, it’s a repub­lic. Each and every one of us is respon­si­ble for the inhu­man and ille­gal behav­ior of these aholes. And they’ve invaded a coun­try that was a key ally of Ray­gun, they’ve tor­tured peo­ple, they’ve screwed over Amer­i­cans that needed health care for the $4billion a week, includ­ing wounded vets. There is basi­cally no way in the Eng­lish lan­guage to express or describe the moral turpi­tude of the cur­rent admin­is­tra­tion. And John McCain wants four more years.

    Know what? Bull­shit. And the hockey mom thinks the Con­sti­tu­tion guar­an­tees a right to sell cop-killer ammo at “gun shows”. Great Mur­ri­can.

    Long national night­mare from which we all need to wake up. Stolen in 2000, stolen in 2004. Brown­shirts lose this time. Ass­holes.

  24. coozledad said on August 29th, 2008 at 10:22 pm

    I sure hope so, Cal­iban. I’m bet­ting my ass on it.

  25. caliban said on August 29th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    You got your basic choice between that ass­hole hack that cut and pasted The DaVinci Code or Will Shakes, who was actu­ally respon­si­ble, along with the catamite Kit Mar­lowe, for the Bible those anti-Christians like to beat. Me, I’ll take twan­gling:

    Be not afeard: the isle is full of noises,
    Sounds and sweet airs that give delight, and hurt not.
    Some­times a thou­sand twan­gling instru­ments
    Will hum about mine ears; and some­time voices,
    That, if I then had wak’d after long sleep,
    Will make me sleep again; and then, in dream­ing,
    The clouds methought would open and show riches
    Ready to drop upon me, that, when I wak’d,
    I cried to dream again.

  26. WhiteBeard said on August 30th, 2008 at 5:34 am

    My wife is a polit­i­cal sci­ence major, has fol­lowed pol­i­tics all her life, thinks this year is the best yet, polit­i­cally speak­ing. After lis­ten­ing to the talk­ing heads, surf­ing the inter­net to find out Palin’s views on every­thing, she has come to this star­tling con­clu­sion. McCain picked Palin because she is, get this, shorter than he is . . . even with her hairdo . . . and that is his guid­ing cri­te­ria. And i sin­cerely hope that he waits at least two weeks until he hits on Palin, his other guid­ing cri­te­ria.

  27. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on August 30th, 2008 at 8:09 am

    Y’all will find this of inter­est, i am sure –
    http://​blogs​.tnr​.com/​t​n​r​/​b​l​o​g​s​/​t​h​e​_​p​l​a​n​k​/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​/​2​0​0​8​/​0​8​/​2​9​/​w​h​a​t​-​t​h​e​-​p​a​l​i​n​-​p​i​c​k​-​m​e​a​n​s​-​f​o​r​-​e​v​a​n​g​e​l​i​c​a​l​s.aspx

    Nice to have The New Repub­lic help­ing me make the case for the com­plex­ity of evan­gel­i­cals.

    Free space on the Bingo sheet for those appalled by Palin: she is pro-”Intelligent Design” [acck, koff] in school class­rooms. Biggest crit­i­cism i have of her so far; feel free to make it your own!

  28. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on August 30th, 2008 at 8:58 am

    On the other hand — from getre​li​gion​.org

    Queerty (motto: “Free of an agenda, except that gay one”) reports that she’s “rel­a­tively good on gay issues”:

    While she opposes gay mar­riage – as all the national con­tenders do – Palin’s fre­quently come out in sup­port of her gay friends and insists she’s open to dis­cus­sions on dis­crim­i­na­tion leg­is­la­tion. Palin told an Alaska news­pa­per that she’s “not out to judge” gay peo­ple. She went on to say that she believes “that hon­or­ing the fam­ily struc­ture is that impor­tant,” and would thus oppose a gay mar­riage mea­sure. She pre­vi­ously sup­ported a 1998 bill to ban gay mar­riage.

    Despite her oppo­si­tion to same-sex nup­tials, Palin helped move Alaska toward a more inclu­sive fron­tier in 2006 when she blocked a bill that would have pro­hib­ited gay ben­e­fits in the state.

  29. Jolene said on August 30th, 2008 at 9:44 am

    Palin’s action on ben­e­fits for same-sex part­ners, Jeff, was essen­tially com­pelled by a deci­sion of the state Supreme Court. Accord­ing to this arti­cle, there is no evi­dence to sug­gest she has done any­thing to sup­port gay rights. In fact, the arti­cle makes the point that, since tak­ing office, her atten­tion has focused almost entirely on oil and gas issues.

  30. Linda said on August 30th, 2008 at 10:19 am

    Jeff, I went to the queerty site, and accord­ing to them, she’s no gay ally.

    You should hope that she does not have much of an impact on the race–when veep picks do, it’s usu­ally a dis­as­trous one, like Thomas Eagle­ton. She is doing what she is sup­posed to do–sealing the deal with social con­ser­v­a­tives who were ner­vous about McCain. Get­ting the PUMA vote? No, only con­ser­v­a­tives think that will hap­pen. Con­ser­v­a­tives mostly think women are dumb (as Caitlin Flana­gan has said out loud), and that any inter­change­able vagina will pull in female vot­ers.

  31. moe99 said on August 30th, 2008 at 10:51 am

    The art is sort of a com­bi­na­tion of RCrumb and this:

    http://www.zappa.com/…/Weasels_Ripped_1024.jpg

  32. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on August 30th, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    Not say­ing she’s a gay ally, just that she isn’t totally pigeon­holeable.