nancynall.com » Caught up.

Caught up.

I can go one night on six hours sleep, fol­lowed by another, but by the third the bill has come due. So I went back to bed this morn­ing after dri­ving the morn­ing car pool, and can report it was the best sleep I’ve had in weeks — 90 min­utes of dead-to-the-world REM with actual dream­ing. It was the unfinished-house dream, which is the one I have when­ever I have work to do. I had dreams last night, too — ones I remem­ber, any­way — in which I was the Cybill Shep­herd char­ac­ter in “Taxi Dri­ver,” and was on a date with a face­less man who took me to a dirty movie. Make of that what you will. I didn’t watch the movie. I was wait­ing for the right moment to make an escape.

All this by way of giv­ing you guys short shrift AGAIN, but I know all any­one wants to talk about today is the last debate, so have at it. Lis­ten­ing from an adja­cent room, McCain sounded angry. This is becom­ing a theme with him, I notice. Per­son­ally, I think the anger is self-directed; every time his eyes flash while Obama gives a calm answer, I imag­ine his train of thought: So, this is my last act. I can’t believe I lis­tened to those peo­ple. There’s no fool like an old fool, I guess. I won­der if I have a retire­ment house in Mon­tana yet. It’s cool up there in the sum­mer — screw Ari­zona.

But I could be projecting.

Any­way, I have report­ing to do. Have at it, my friends, and I’ll be in and out.

30 responses to
“Caught up.”

  1. Laura said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    When Katie Couric inter­viewed Joe the Plumber (post debate), he told her that when he met Obama, the sen­a­tor tap-danced around the issues – bet­ter than Sammy Davis Jr. Hmmmmmm

  2. Dorothy said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    Maybe his name should be changed to Joe the Bigot?

  3. LAMary said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Joe the spigot bigot.

  4. Kirk said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Break­ing news: Joe the Plumber has no plumb­ing license, AP reports. He said that, because he works for some­one else, he doesn’t need one. Does that apply to nurses and lawyers, too?

  5. nancy said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    I’m going to give Joe the Plumber a pass on this one, because when I say, “tap­danced like (fill in the blank),” I can’t think of any white tap­pers. Gene Kelly? Shirley Tem­ple? Fred Astaire? A lit­tle Googling brought me a cou­ple more, as well as this won­der­ful detail: taps are known as “cla­que­ttes” in French.

  6. Kirk said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    I was think­ing the same on tap dancers. Were I to answer such a ques­tion that way, I’d have said he tap-danced around it like Gre­gory Hines. Joe prefers to stick with the clas­sic era, obviously.

  7. Jeff Borden said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    Joe the Plumber is actu­ally related by mar­riage to the infa­mous Charles Keat­ing, the bank­ing exec­u­tive and reli­gious zealot who got a whole scan­dal named after him.

    In short, Joe is GOP roy­alty. He wouldn’t vote for Obama if you gave him the plumb­ing com­pany he says he wants to buy.

    My hap­pi­ness with the prob­a­ble elec­tion of Obama is heav­ily weighted by the mess he or any other pres­i­dent will face after eight years of the most cor­rupt and incom­pe­tent admin­is­tra­tion in Amer­i­can his­tory. (Sorry, James Buchanan but you’ve lost your spot in history’s shame­ful pantheon.)

    There will be no hon­ey­moon for the next pres­i­dent. And he may well be a sin­gle term pres­i­dent. The moves that must be made, the tasks that must be under­taken to mop up after this band of goons will be painful and hor­rific. The next pres­i­dent will still confront:

    a.) Two wars going badly.
    b.) Bud­get deficits so vast as to defy descrip­tion.
    c.) An econ­omy some experts believe will remain in reces­sion for another two or three years.
    d.) A dam­aged Army and Marine Corps.
    e.) Angry and/or bit­ter allies.
    f.) Courts and fed­eral bureau­cra­cies stuffed with rightwing zealots and Regency Uni­ver­sity grads.
    g.) Just enough Repub­li­cans in Con­gress to pre­vent for­ward move­ment on an array of issues.
    h.) Diplo­matic chal­lenges on every continent.

    The pres­i­dent is going to be tested from Day One, both domes­ti­cally and inter­na­tion­ally. This nation can’t tol­er­ate another Repub­li­can pres­i­dency at this moment but I have no illu­sions that Obama will have a very, very rocky presidency.

  8. John said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:07 pm

    Don­ald O’Connor.

  9. caliban said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

  10. moe99 said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

    I enforce con­trac­tor reg­is­tra­tion laws in WA state and RCW 18.106.020 pro­vides in part: “No per­son may engage in or offer to engage in the trade of plumb­ing with­out hav­ing a jour­ney­man cer­tifi­cate, spe­cialty cer­tifi­cate, tem­po­rary per­mit, or trainee cer­tifi­cate.” How­ever, in Wa state you can work for a con­trac­tor to do con­trac­tor type work and not need to be reg­is­tered as a con­trac­tor, so per­haps Ohio is more lax on this. But frankly, I would not want any­one near my pipes unless they were cer­ti­fied in some way. I know, that’s harsh, but hav­ing seen what I’ve seen, I don’t think it is unrealistic.

  11. Kirk said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    Ray Bol­ger, too.

  12. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    Joe is appar­ently opposed to other soci­etal con­straints as well, such as pay­ing taxes.

    Also, Politico reported last night that it appeared he wasn’t reg­is­tered to vote. Today, it seems that he is; his name didn’t appear in the ini­tial search of the voter rolls because the name on file was mis­spelled. This makes Joe just like the new vot­ers who are in dan­ger of hav­ing their names purged from the Ohio voter rolls right now.

  13. nancy said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    Looks like Joe got the same care­ful vet­ting that Sarah Palin got. I know it’s hard for some of you to believe, but every now and then I try to step back and look at these cam­paigns with a lit­tle objec­tiv­ity, and ask myself if they might change my mind. And after watch­ing the GOP train­wreck this sum­mer and fall, I just don’t see how. It’s like every new dawn brings a new kitchen-sink strat­egy. If you can’t run your cam­paign, how will you run the country?

  14. MichaelG said on October 16th, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    I asked that ques­tion of John Kerry last time around, Nance, and voted for him any­way. Hold­ing my nose.

    In CA Joe could work as a plumber for some­body else but couldn’t open his own shop with­out a contractor’s license. Most “plumbers” are roto-rooter type guys any­way, not real plumbers.

    By the way, in NoCal the plumbers and elec­tri­cians unions have excel­lent, rig­or­ous appren­tice­ship pro­grams. A per­son with a union jour­ney­man card knows his or her stuff.

  15. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    The Plumbers and Pip­efit­ters Union endorsed Obama way last Jan­u­ary, but, if he’s not licensed, he may not be a union mem­ber either.

  16. Gasman said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    I have been dis­gusted with the Repub­li­can rhetoric since at least 1980. They have got­ten pro­gres­sively meaner, nas­tier, and more prone to lying dur­ing the inter­ven­ing 28 years. Dur­ing that time, I have not wit­nessed a sin­gle Repub­li­can cam­paign for national office that was issue dri­ven or was con­ducted hon­or­ably. Hav­ing said that, the McCain/Palin cam­paign has been grubby even by Repub­li­can stan­dards. Nei­ther of the two prin­ci­pals on the ticket seems to be able to tell the truth.

    I find it astound­ing that they lie as a mat­ter of course even when it seems unnec­es­sary for any per­ceiv­able gain. The Joe the Plumber plant is just another hokey con­trivance designed to con the vot­ers. That kind of behav­ior indi­cates a pal­pa­ble con­tempt of the McCain/Palin cam­paign for the Amer­i­can pub­lic. If they are so damn right on the issues, why do they need to lie to us?

    At least our Euro­pean cousins are not as gullible con­cern­ing Saint Sarah, Queen of All That Is Pure And Right­eous (and guns too!):

    http://​www​.cnn​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​P​O​L​I​T​I​C​S​/​1​0​/​1​6​/​e​u​r​o​p​e​.​p​a​l​i​n​.​o​a​k​l​e​y​/​i​n​d​e​x.html

    Palin’s pick fur­ther dis­plays McCain’s dis­dain for the Amer­i­can vot­ers. By any stan­dard you would invoke to mea­sure a candidate’s fit­ness for the pres­i­dency, she doesn’t even make the first cut. She is an utter buf­foon. She is also a vin­dic­tive bully that seems to rel­ish using her elected power to set­tle old grudges. I am will­ing to bet that she will be jammed up in this ethics probe to the point that she will not fin­ish her term as Gov­er­nor. In my mind, it is sim­ply a mat­ter of will she resign, or will she be removed from office?

    Given all that, why in hell would any­one vote for these clowns?

  17. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    I don’t think there’s any rea­son to assume Joe is a plant, Gas­man. Obama was knock­ing on doors in his neigh­bor­hood, and he got into the mix.

  18. Dorothy said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    Ray Bol­ger? Buddy Ebsen?

  19. Gasman said on October 16th, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    Jolene,
    A rel­a­tive of Charles Keat­ing, Repub roy­alty that just “hap­pens” to get in the mix? I don’t buy that one bit. As to the racist tinge to the Sammy Davis line, if this cam­paign hadn’t con­stantly reeked of big­otry either from the top of the ticket or their sur­ro­gates or sup­port­ers, I’d be inclined to give them a pass. How­ever, we’ve heard inces­santly about Islam­o­pho­bic charge of Obama being a Mus­lim, Obama being an Arab (i.e., ter­ror­ist), openly call­ing him a ter­ror­ist, and the lat­est sug­ges­tion that minori­ties are to blame for the sub-prime loan fiasco. Too many instances in my mind to think that Joe’s remarks weren’t indica­tive of racial prejudice.

    If Joe Plumber was a plant, why did McCain mess up his name? Why also did McCain bring up autism in ref­er­ence to Palin and her famil­iar­ity with same? Surely, in the debate prep his staff had told him about Down’s syn­drome and not autism. It does not fol­low that Sarah Palin expe­ri­ence with Down’s means that she knows any­thing about autism.

    Those types of gaffes seem out of place for some­one in McCain’s posi­tion, given all of the prepa­ra­tion that he undoubt­edly went through prior to the debate. Is this indica­tive of some­thing we should be con­cerned about? In ret­ro­spect, it sure looked like Rea­gan was show­ing signs of demen­tia before the end of even his first term. I am not try­ing to be insult­ing to McCain, but he would be the old­est pres­i­dent in his­tory. He also has an idiot as a run­ning mate. I am not tak­ing a cheap polit­i­cal shot here, I am gen­uinely con­cerned in his abil­ity, or inabil­ity to ful­fill the terms of the office.

  20. Scout said on October 16th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    Oh Nancy, how I WISH Grampy would say “screw Ari­zona!” I and sev­eral thou­sand of my fel­low res­i­dents would be ecstatic.

  21. The Subtle Rudder said on October 16th, 2008 at 3:44 pm

    Watched a bit of the debate last night with mom, who’s a nurse. (Well, mostly we watched Project Run­way, while I tracked the debate live­blog­ging on my phone). I knew she was deeply offended by the Palin pick, and that she’d had her first fight ever with her sister-in-law over Polar(izing) Spice ear­lier that day. But I was astounded when she turned around after 40 sec­onds of Grandpa Spice and said, “That’s it. He’s senile! Any­one can see it!”

  22. mark said on October 16th, 2008 at 3:54 pm

    Well, I see the “attack the mes­sage by destroy­ing the mes­sen­ger” approach to argu­ment around here extends even to poor old Joe. Keep look­ing, folks. Maybe he has a daugh­ter who is preg­nant out of wed­lock– that will elim­i­nate any rel­e­vance to Obama’s “I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for every­body” com­ment. If his sec­ond cousin is on a sex offender list, or his wife got caught years ago on a “Girls Gone Wild” video, then you can claim com­plete victory.

    The times are chang­ing. Peo­ple need to pay a high price for dar­ing to ask Obama a ques­tion that elic­its a reveal­ing response, par­tic­u­larly when the cam­eras are running.

  23. Dexter said on October 16th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    I couldn’t watch much, because the Phillies were beat­ing the Dodgers on the way to win­ning the NL pen­nant.
    Base­ball junkies can’t be dis­tracted by a mere pres­i­den­tial elec­tion!
    If Tampa Bay beats Boston and advances to the World Series, it will be the worst-case sce­nario for Fox-TV, accord­ing to base­ball genius/guru Steve Stone today. With no LA, NY, or Chicago Cubs…shares will plum­met, accord­ing to Stone, who I believe will be in the 2009 White Sox tele­cast­ing booth.

  24. LAMary said on October 16th, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    Mark, I haven’t said any­thing bad about Joe. I will say I was tired of hear­ing about Joe about two men­tions into the debate, since it was clearly one of those “look over there, not at what I’m actu­ally doing” deals. Accord­ing to the fact check­ers on the radio this morn­ing, Joe would not have to pay a fine if he didn’t insure his work­ers and Joe would not have had a tax increase. Joe and McCain choose to ignore those facts, and if that’s what they need to do, so be it.

  25. Gasman said on October 16th, 2008 at 6:12 pm

    mark,
    Oh, come on! Nobody was crit­i­cal of of Joe the Plumber, or McCain, because they deigned to ask Obama a ques­tion. Some of us were incred­u­lous because of Joe’s more-than-a-little-miraculously-coincidental con­nec­tions to Charles Keat­ing. How about if a cousin of Genifer Flow­ers just “hap­pens” to turn up and ask McCain a ques­tion that he can’t answer to her sat­is­fac­tion? To add to the improb­a­bil­ity, how about if Obama then brought it up onstage dur­ing a debate? When the media found out the con­nec­tion, are you sug­gest­ing that you would accept that at face value?

    Yet again, you dodge, weave, and obfus­cate around the issue at hand. McCain tried to stage a the­atri­cal “gotcha!” ploy and it back­fired. He couldn’t even get the name right. Just another of McCain’s weekly Hail Mary passes lobbed into an empty end-zone.

    McCain & Palin; bea­cons of truthi­ness in these trou­bled times.

  26. Jeff Borden said on October 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

    Mark,

    Say what­ever you want about Joe the Plumber, but Obama has been cam­paign­ing for almost two years now and has dealt with scores of rough ques­tions. Sarah Palin, on the other hand, plucked from obscu­rity and thrust onto the national stage, has not and will not answer any queries unless they are made by rightwing toad­ies like Sean Han­nity. Now the Wash­ing­ton Post is report­ing that Secret Ser­vice agents are pre­vent­ing reporters from inter­view­ing mem­bers of the audi­ence at Palin events. McCain, once the dar­ling of the press corps, also has refused to have any press con­fer­ences since the con­ven­tion. The Rovians have taken con­trol of his campaign.

    The his­toric nature of Obama’s cam­paign makes it easy for his detrac­tors to claim he has had an easy time of it because he has attracted so much cov­er­age. Yeah. Right. Much of that cov­er­age has been neg­a­tive or silly or both.

    My favorite being that this man raised first by a sin­gle mother, who some­times needed food stamps to get by, and then by his grand­par­ents; who worked his ass off to get into Har­vard and excelled; who only paid off his stu­dent loans a few years ago when his books sold well; who eschewed a guar­an­teed for­tune on Wall Street or K Street to work as a com­mu­nity orga­nizer; who mar­ried a South Side Chicago woman who fol­lowed a sim­i­lar path; is some­how an elit­ist while the son and grand­son of admi­rals; who attended Annapo­lis; became a jet fighter pilot; returned from Viet­nam a hero; and mar­ried a beer heiress; and owns some­thing like eight houses and 13 cars is a man of the people.

    Please.

  27. Linda said on October 16th, 2008 at 9:03 pm

    Kirk:
    Where Joe (really Samuel) works in Lucas County, Ohio, he and his employer need a license, and it turns out nei­ther of them have it. Of course, now every­body knows this. They also know he has a lien on him (which HE prob­a­bly didn’t know till now). I bet he ends up curs­ing the womb that bore him.

  28. Linda said on October 16th, 2008 at 9:13 pm

  29. Howie said on October 16th, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    Hear, Hear, Dex­ter from a base­ball junkie who also hap­pens to be a True Red Phillie Phanatic.

  30. Joe K said on October 16th, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    Will some­one explain to me how you can give a tax cut to 95% of Americans,when 40%, don’t pay any income tax????.
    And who decided,$250,000, was the cut off point??
    And if after say a year 250,000 still doesn’t gen­er­ate enough rev­enue, who gets to decide what the next level of being rich is?? 150,000?? 100,000??
    I really don’t care if Joe the plumber or Joe the ceo asked the ques­tion the Obama answer was still going to be the same. I am going to decide who is rich and then take YOUR money and give it to some­one else. And one more ques­tion, If you tax Exxon Mobil’s profit, do you think they will sit back and say Oh well, will make do with what is left. or do you think they will raise their price to cover their tax bill thereby putting the bur­den back on the work­ing peo­ple??
    Joe