nancynall.com » Don’t light a match.

Don’t light a match.

If Cal­i­for­nia were Vir­ginia, they could get Pat Robert­son to turn stuff like this back:

fire

God hates the Golden State, obvi­ously. I often note, dri­ving around town, that Detroit is really one of the butt-ugliest cities I’ve ever seen, but so far I’ve never seen any­thing like this, dri­ving home. On the other hand, I can’t say it’s all that much worse than a typ­i­cal Jan­u­ary morn­ing com­mute down, say, Jef­fer­son, with the boarded store­fronts and the snow pushed to the curb and what is that in the right lane that I can barely make out in the gray murk of a steely dawn? An old woman dri­ving her elec­tric scooter in the road because the side­walk is impass­able? Oh, OK.

(Some­times she’s walk­ing on two canes. Alan and I have been to the Majes­tic The­ater com­plex a cou­ple times in the past year. It’s adja­cent to the Detroit Med­ical Cen­ter, for­merly Detroit Receiv­ing, the big pub­lic hos­pi­tal that serves every­one. In a place where the safety net is strained and fray­ing, it’s safe to say that not every­one is released from the ER into the arms of a lov­ing fam­ily and a com­fort­able home. Both times we were at the Majes­tic, I came this­close to mow­ing down some poor shlub in a hos­pi­tal scrub top and fresh ban­dages, jay­walk­ing home from their lat­est doc­tor visit, across Wood­ward and against the light. One was in a wheel­chair. I almost wet my pants.)

Any­way, LA Mary, who sent me a cou­ple of fire pic­tures this week: Keep your roof wet and your pow­der dry.

I’ve said this before, I’ll say it again: It’s hard to under­stand what life is like in another place, even another place you’ve vis­ited. Even if you read a lot and are very skilled at putting your­self in the shoes of another. And if that place is Los Ange­les, triple that. I’ve never been any­where in this coun­try that felt so much like a dif­fer­ent coun­try, and that mostly has to do with the land and the weather. Every­one dis­cusses L.A.‘s essen­tial odd­ness in terms of free­ways, which seems silly, because every city big­ger than a grease spot has free­ways. What always baf­fled me about L.A. was the topog­ra­phy — one minute you’re in a reg­u­lar old city and the next you’ve gone over a ridge and you’re in a canyon, and you might as well be in a cow­boy movie. When I was free­lanc­ing for a horse mag­a­zine, I had a long chat with a California-based rider, who told me she kept four jumpers on a sin­gle acre of land tucked back in one of those canyons, and it all worked out fine. There was a small barn — I imag­ine the horses slept in bunk beds — and a small cor­ral made of PVC pipe, and her own liv­ing space. The tack was hung from trees. The ani­mals were rid­den daily, and there was a net­work of trails lead­ing to a com­mu­nity ring for their school­work, and that was just the Cal­i­for­nia Way.

In the Mid­west, in case you’re won­der­ing, the rule of thumb for horse­keep­ing is one acre per horse. Some peo­ple go denser than that, but those would be com­mer­cial oper­a­tions, not back­yard owners.

Throw in the hell winds from the desert and the sort of single-digit humid­ity that makes your skin feel like a stretched drum­head, it’s easy to see how this sort of thing hap­pens. But hard to fully under­stand, just the same.

Mean­while, I’m always telling peo­ple how flat is is here. How flat? This flat: Last week­end I stopped at a light at Mound and 10 Mile Road, fac­ing south. And I could see the Renais­sance Cen­ter. Ten miles away.

OK, blog­gage, while I fran­ti­cally clean house — John and Sam due this after­noon — and pre­pare for Tolstoy:

You know how Sarah Palin com­plained about how irri­tated she was with Katie Couric’s mean, irrel­e­vant ques­tions? She was prob­a­bly hap­pier with Rush Lim­baugh:

“You seem to under­stand the stark choice we have and the real dan­ger the coun­try faces in the future if the Obama-Biden ticket is elected. And I’d just like to know, do you see it that way?”

“I do,” she responded.

I missed David Frum on Rachel Maddow’s show the other night, but that’s why we have YouTube. My lord, what a hor­ri­ble, hor­ri­ble man. Is it worth it, hav­ing to take ridicu­lous, con­temptible posi­tions in pub­lic in exchange for a fat liv­ing? It can’t be, not in the end. (When he brought up Paul Wol­fowitz, I thought my head would asplode.) Roy, as usual, nails it.

OK, sheet-changin’ time. The floor is yours.

74 responses to
“Don’t light a match.”

  1. brian stouder said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:18 am

    From the Lim­baugh link above:

    “I’ve got noth­ing to lose in this,” Ms. Palin said. “And I think Amer­ica has every­thing to gain by under­stand­ing the dif­fer­ences, the con­trasts here between Obama and McCain.”

    When I read “I’ve got noth­ing to lose in this”, I was thunderstruck.

    True enough, I may well be mis­in­ter­pret­ing what she meant (a recur­ring prob­lem with me!), but Good Heavens!

    It is like she took the detached, out of step atti­tude that McCain expressed at the begin­ning of the mar­ket crash — “the fun­da­men­tals of the econ­omy are strong” — and tur­bocharged it!!

    ‘Course, when your talk­ing to a multi-millionaire lip-flapper who is safely clois­tered in a Florida com­pound, an “I’ve got noth­ing to lose” atti­tude in these try­ing times WILL meet with recep­tive ears; one won­ders about the aver­age Uncle Rush lis­tener, though

  2. nancy said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:25 am

    That was the prover­bial rare moment of can­dor, Brian. She knows she’s on a los­ing team, and she’s not work­ing for the elec­tion of John McCain in 2008; she’s work­ing for the nom­i­na­tion of Sarah Palin in 2012, or 2016. That much is sim­ply obvi­ous — it’s the only way her strat­egy makes sense at all.

  3. coozledad said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:31 am

    Nabokov said some­thing once about sociopaths being unable to hold a mir­ror up to them­selves. I don’t think Frum is a sociopath; but he’s def­i­nitely been a stringer for one, and it appears to have rubbed off.
    One of his asso­ciates must have informed him he came off as a bloated, heavy lid­ded cretin, because he issued an excuse (I was jet-lagged) after the show.
    What I saw was Mad­dow very gen­tly mop­ping the stu­dio floor with his arse.

  4. Rana said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:32 am

    As a long-time res­i­dent of Cal­i­for­nia, I feel much that way about the Mid­west, though obvi­ously in reverse. The grad­ual shift­ing from city to sub­urb to farm and then… back to the sub­urbs of _another_ city is still quite odd to me.

    The fires and mud­slides though — that can be laid pretty clearly at human feet. It’s a fire ecol­ogy out there — lots of dry, resinous native species — but one that used to burn fre­quently enough that the fires were small and unim­por­tant. (Pretty much every kid in Cal­i­for­nia used to grow up know­ing what a “brush fire” smelled like, ver­sus the smell of woodsmoke from a fire­place.) These days, there are so many peo­ple in areas with chap­ar­ral, that they’ve been unwill­ing to either let it burn or to do the hard work of grub­bing out the dead under­growth. I used to walk through the smaller canyons of San Diego, the kind with big mega man­sions perched on the rim, and shake my head at the state of the brush in them. Not good. Ditto on the mud­slides — which the fire makes worse by destroy­ing ground cover and hard­en­ing the sur­face soil, increas­ing run-off. (If you ever want to read some amus­ingly cyn­i­cal analy­ses of these dynam­ics, check out Mike Davis’ books on Los Angeles.)

    All in all, California’s sim­ply a place with far more peo­ple than its envi­ron­ment can com­fort­ably sus­tain; that, along with the high cost of liv­ing and lack of jobs, is a big part of why we no longer live there.

    Still, I miss it.

  5. John said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:33 am

    She (Palin) truly is a flash in the pan. Except­ing it ain’t gold! Can you imag­ine her for one moment on the cam­paign trail in Iowa or New Hampshire?

  6. nancy said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:36 am

    Rana, some day you natives will have to explain “debris flows” to me. John McPhee’s essay on them, com­plete with the descrip­tion of debris catch basins the size of foot­ball sta­di­ums, left me barely com­pre­hend­ing them. They’re, basi­cally, mud­slides? Of devel­oped land? So they’re mud­slides with houses and cars mixed in? Mind-boggling.

  7. Rana said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:04 am

    Nancy — yup, that’s what they are.

    I will say, though, that while fires and quakes were pretty famil­iar (at least small ones) I don’t remem­ber mud­slides being that big of a deal. The kind McPhee describes (from The Con­trol of Nature, right?) seem pretty extreme — sort of the mud­slide equiv­a­lent of the big fires we see now. The mud­slides I was famil­iar with, grow­ing up, were ones that blocked parts of roads in steep, hilly areas — the kind of places that had “watch for falling rock” signs and wire mesh on the slope. I wasn’t in LA, though — San Diego and the Bay Area and work­ing knowl­edge of the south­east­ern deserts — so LAMary would prob­a­bly have a bet­ter sense of the Los Ange­les mud­slides than I would.

    If you want to see pic­tures of truly impres­sive move­ments of dirt, check out the his­toric pic­tures of hydraulic min­ing — now, _those_ were mudslides!

  8. brian stouder said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:11 am

    OK — so if Cheney dies and we get a state funeral, what effect might that have on the election?

  9. LAMary said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:12 am

    I read that John McPhee essay not long after I bought a house here, shud­der. Rana is right about where houses have been built. Much of the fire areas that are pop­u­lated are filled with houses 25 years old or less. Wind tears through those canyons, and they filled now with big houses on cul-de-sacs. I have sev­eral cowork­ers who live in the Santa Clarita area. They are used to being evac­u­ated. Where they live is not tol­er­a­ble with­out air con­di­tion­ing 24 hours a day for about 8 months out of the year. They com­mute 40 or 50 miles in each direc­tion to work, and every­thing nat­ural around them burns every year. I’ve only lived here since 81, and the sprawl I’ve seen makes no sense other than it allows peo­ple to own huge silly houses when they never could before, at a cost that is not part of your mort­gage pay­ment. They think I’m nuts for liv­ing in the city.

  10. ellen said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:24 am

    I went to K-State. Which is right next to Ft Riley, home of the Big Red 1. They do infantry artillery train­ing at the fort nearly every day. So basi­cally you live with shelling as near-constant back­ground noise. Depend­ing on the day/exercise, your dorm room win­dows might rat­tle. I was there in the run-up to Gulf War 1. Then it was shelling and Black­hawk heli­copters in the sky. I had a Lebanese instruc­tor. He felt right at home.

  11. paddyo' said on October 15th, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    I grew up in SoCal’s San Gabriel Val­ley, about 20 miles east of the L.A. city lim­its, in the shadow of the moun­tains of the same name. (IF they could actu­ally cast a shadow, I should has­ten to add; the amaz­ingly nox­ious yel­low smog of the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s flat­tened every­thing and often hid those moun­tains from view, less than 3 miles from our front yard.)

    We had two sea­sonal rituals:

    In late summer/early fall, watch from our front lawn as the wild­fires leapt from the ridges of the San Gabriels … and in the win­ter, watch the mud­slides down the same foothills canyons and hill­sides above Azusa, Glen­dora, San Dimas, etc.

    A for­mer neigh­bor from our flatland/valley-floor sub­di­vi­sion (“Glen­side Grove,” they called it in the mid-‘50s when throngs of post-WWII cou­ples and their grow­ing broods moved into no-money-down 3 BR /1 – 1/2 BA ram­blers carved out of old orange groves, with three or four still-producing trees left on each lit­tle lot) moved on up into the hills one year, and that win­ter saw a neighbor’s house surf down the street in front of them on a wave/wall of “debris flow” and mud.

    It’s the L.A. con­di­tion … hasn’t changed in half a cen­tury or more.

  12. moe99 said on October 15th, 2008 at 12:50 pm

    http://​nymag​.com/​d​a​i​l​y​/​i​n​t​e​l​/​2​0​0​8​/​1​0​/​m​a​t​t​_​t​a​i​b​b​i​_​a​n​d​_​b​y​r​o​n​_​y​o​r​k​_​b​u​t.html

    The back and forth is absolutely hilar­i­ous. Not as good as Rachel Mad­dow with Frum, but again, it points out the shal­low­ness of the Repubs on the eco­nomic cri­sis. I want the away from reg­u­lat­ing my banks stat!

  13. MichaelG said on October 15th, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    The worst mud­slide in recent mem­ory was in 2005 in La Con­chita, Ven­tura County just up the coast from L. A. There have been many others.

    http://​www​.beach​cal​i​for​nia​.com/​s​e​a​c​l​i​f​f.html

    One of the guys in our group is doing the slope sta­bi­liza­tion con­tract there even as we speak.

    Some years ago there was a large slide on Angel Island in S. F. Bay. I had the fixit job then. It was basi­cally “See that road and hill­side sit­ting in the Bay? Pick it all up and put back on the hillside.”

    Sun­day and Mon­day Angel Island par­tially burned down. Check out the link and click on “view more images”:

    http://​www​.sfgate​.com/​c​g​i​-​b​i​n​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​.​c​g​i​?​f​=​/​c​/​a​/​2​0​0​8​/​1​0​/​1​5​/​B​A​S​C​1​3​H​3​IJ.DTL

    Now you know why I remain so ner­vous about my for­mer spouse who still lives in the woods in Auburn.

  14. Gasman said on October 15th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    For you few McCain/Palin sup­port­ers who reg­u­larly read and con­tribute here at NN​.com, the fol­low­ing excerpts from last night’s Olber­mann suc­cinctly encap­su­lates the hypocrisy, inflam­ma­tory hyper­bole, and the bizarrely schiz­o­phrenic nature to which the McCain/Palin cam­paign has descended.

    On Con­gress­man John Lewis’ remarks regard­ing the McCain/Palin campaign’s seem­ingly tacit endorse­ment of vio­lence at their ral­lies, a la vin­tage George Wallace:

    McCain:
    “And I’m aston­ished that Sen­a­tor Obama has not repu­di­ated Con­gress­man John Lewis, who said the most out­ra­geous thing I’ve ever seen in pol­i­tics. Con­nect­ing Sarah Palin and me to a church bomb­ing, to George Wal­lace, to seg­re­ga­tion, and Sen­a­tor Obama has not repu­di­ated John Lewis. That’s the worst thing I’ve ever heard.”

    Really? The worst thing he’s ever heard? Worse than “Ter­ror­ist!”, “Off with his head!”, or worse than “Kill him!”? Judg­ing from their actions, the Secret Ser­vice finds the later com­ments far worse as they have launched a crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion into the “Kill him!” remarks. They are not inves­ti­gat­ing Con­gress­man Lewis’ remarks. Shout­ing “Kill him!” while refer­ring to a pres­i­den­tial can­di­date is crim­i­nal, Con­gress­man Lewis’ remarks are not. So, Sen­a­tor McCain, how exactly are John Lewis’ remarks “the worst thing (you’ve) ever heard?”

    Then there’s this gem, where McCain asserts that there are rec­i­p­ro­cally equiv­a­lent remarks about him at Obama ral­lies (from a CNN inter­view with Dana Bash):

    Bash:
    “We’ve heard peo­ple in the crowd scream­ing things like ‘Ter­ror­ist’, ‘Trai­tor’ and when you talked about Sen­a­tor Obama, and worse.”

    McCain (inter­rupt­ing):
    “I’ve heard the same thing, I’ve heard the same thing, at uh, I’ve heard the same thing, unfor­tu­nately at Sen­a­tor Obama’s ral­lies being said about me.”

    Can any McCain sup­porter cite such an instance? Can you pro­vide a sin­gle video link or tran­script? No, you can­not, because it is pure fic­tion — no, it is a lie — for McCain to make such ridicu­lous charges. Set aside McCain’s ham-fisted and goofy responses to the lat­est eco­nomic cri­sis. I believe that it is McCain’s schiz­o­phrenic, over-the-top hyper­bole that is hav­ing the great­est effect upon his declin­ing poll numbers.

    He acts as if we are too stu­pid to remem­ber what he said yes­ter­day. He seems to feel that all Amer­i­cans should behave like the mind­less ditto-head drones that pop­u­late his ral­lies, the ones who lap up the most ludi­crous non­sense and duti­fully boo on cue. I won­dered how these folks could sus­tain the deaf­en­ing lev­els of cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance being pumped into their skulls, then I real­ized: there is no dis­so­nance if there is no cog­ni­tion. It seems that you either have to be gullible enough to not ques­tion the McCain/Palin rhetoric, or you have to be will­ing to go along with all the lies.

  15. alex said on October 15th, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    La Con­chita — hey, that’s Venezue­lan for “a lit­tle pussy.”

    Michelle Obama’s in the Fort right now giv­ing a speech. I’d be there were it not for pre­vi­ous com­mit­ments, work related.

  16. brian stouder said on October 15th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Michelle Obama’s in the Fort right now

    Yes — they moved her event to the Grand Wayne con­ven­tion cen­ter, instead of the airy pavil­lion at Head­wa­ters Park.

    Sarah Palin is doing an event in Indi­anapo­lis today, too.

    If you wanted to go see Ms Obama, all you had to do was show up at the event, and then you’re in.

    If you wanted to go see Ms Palin, first you go to your local Repub­li­can head­quar­ters, and request a ticket; and if they decide to let you have one, then you’d have a chance to get in.

    But what the hell, Ms Palin’s ‘got noth­ing to lose in this’, at all!

  17. Jolene said on October 15th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    Marc Ambinders reports that Obama’s Michi­gan field staff are being deployed in more com­pet­i­tive states – some to Indi­ana and some to North Car­olina. Coo­zledad, Brian, Alex … here’s your chance to meet big-time polit­i­cal operatives!

  18. caliban said on October 15th, 2008 at 1:50 pm

    I remem­ber vividly see­ing scenes like that fly­ing into Detroit in 1967 after a fam­ily vaca­tion in Freeport GB, while being told by our pilot that the city was about to be put under mar­tial law and that we’d bet­ter get our bag­gage and get our white asses the hell out of Dodge, out Wood­ward Avenue to Birm­ing­ham and the Bloom­fields. Still smol­der­ing, with troops and tanks too, when I went to Met­ro­pol­i­tan Hos­pi­tal (12th Street and Tuxedo, hard by the John Lodge, cou­ple blocks from the Ground Zero blind pig)) with my dad. He had a Pub­lic Safety Physician’s pass through check­points and 24-hour cur­few, and the rest of us didn’t think he should make the drive solo.

    Human agents for the con­fla­gra­tions, for sure in Detroit, most likely in Cal­i­for­nia (sub­prime arson?). Dif­fer­ent tin­der – slum­lord death­traps in the ghet-toe, red­wood and glass greed cathe­drals in mis­man­aged forests.

  19. Jeff Borden said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    Cal­i­for­nia Lovers or Haters:

    Some years ago I read an book called “Ecol­ogy of Fear: Los Ange­les and the Imag­i­na­tion of Dis­as­ter” by a Los Ange­les based writer named Mike Davis.

    Among the fac­toids I recall is that Mal­ibu Canyon is one of the most fire-prone canyons in the world, a place so dan­ger­ous that indige­nous Indian tribes burned it out every year rather than be con­sumed by fire. Now, of course, it’s home to multi-gazillion-dollar man­sions. When fire take them out, the insur­ance pays off and even larger homes go up.

    At base, this book is about how South­ern Cal­i­for­nia was ruined after the Span­ish were dri­ven out because the North­ern Euro­peans who took over did not rec­og­nize SoCal as a Mediterranean-style, arid climate.

    His book is very, very down­beat, con­clud­ing that SoCal may actu­ally be mov­ing from a rel­a­tively wet period that spanned the last cen­tury or so to its real sta­tus as a gen­uine desert. As pop­u­la­tions grow in states to the east, the bat­tle for water among the parched res­i­dents of SoCal, Nevada, Ari­zona, etc. could be pretty intense.

  20. Jolene said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:24 pm

    Jeff, based on what lit­tle I know about what’s ahead of us as cli­mate change unfolds, the bat­tle for water may get intense in lots of places. SoCal and the neigh­bor­ing states are just a small part of the prob­lem, although, of course, they’re our part.

  21. Catherine said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    Ange­leno since 1986 here. I grew up mostly in CA’s Cen­tral Coast where we were taught to turn up our noses at the sprawl and ugli­ness of LA. Liv­ing here and gain­ing a small mea­sure of under­stand­ing has changed my atti­tude. Sev­eral books that helped me see this city: Slouch­ing Towards Beth­le­hem by Joan Did­ion; any mys­tery by Naomi Hir­i­hara; Less Than Zero by Bret Eas­ton Ellis (I know, not all that as a book) and my very favorite, Tor­tilla Cur­tain by TC Boyle. A lit­tle James M. Cain and John Stein­beck (for con­text) are nice too. The brush­fires are part of the pack­age, and you haven’t really lived here until you’ve stood in a friend’s yard watch­ing the euca­lyp­tus on the next ridge flash into flames, won­der­ing how long until it reaches you.

    So, what books get at the heart of Detroit, or Alexan­dria, or any other city?

  22. JGW said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    I finally have some­thing (off topic) to con­tribute. It’s a blog called “Criggo” which com­piles news­pa­per goofs, home town news (police blot­ter) for your read­ing pleasure.

    http://​criggo​.word​press​.com/

    Their motto is: News­pa­pers are Going Away. That’s too bad.

    I’m going to have to scour the Bluffton News-Banner for mate­r­ial to add. I hap­pen to like the post here titled Sexism:

    http://​criggo​.word​press​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​1​0​/​15/97/

  23. Jim said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    The fact that Indi­ana is even in play show’s where this thing is heading.

  24. brian stouder said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:42 pm

    Jim, you got that right! On the other hand, I’ll only start to breathe more eas­ily when — is it Decem­ber 20th? — the Elec­toral Col­lege bal­lot­ing is over, and the President-elect is Con­sti­tu­tion­ally elected

  25. MichaelG said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    There’ll be a big fight over water between NoCal and SoCal. It’s been sim­mer­ing for years. It’s called the periph­eral canal.

    You know you’re a CA res­i­dent when you have pix of water bombers taken from your front porch. When you have to clean the ashes off your car.

  26. LAMary said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    You get very jumpy here dur­ing fire sea­son. My hill has been built up since the early twen­ti­eth cen­tury and we’ve had a cou­ple of slides, a cou­ple of small­ish fires. It could be another Oak­land Hills eas­ily, though. My house is from either 1928 or 1935, depend­ing on which doc­u­ment you look at, and it’s held up so far. We’re good about brush clear­ance and we don’t have a shake roof, but you are only as safe as your neigh­bors are dili­gent, and on a windy day, peo­ple five miles away are your neighbors.

  27. Rana said on October 15th, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    Jeff — you should also check out Davis’ _City of Quartz_ — which was his first look at “hid­den L.A.” Reisner’s _Cadillac Desert_ and Don Worster’s _Rivers of Empire_ are also pretty good (if huge).

    (If any­one wants fur­ther sug­ges­tions for books on the sub­ject of Cal­i­forn­ian and West­ern his­tory and envi­ron­men­tal issues, email me (it’s what my degree’s in).)

  28. mark said on October 15th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    gas­man–

    You are always amus­ing. You should get a dic­tio­nary. And then look up “hyper­bole”, fol­lowed by a quick glance at “irony.”

  29. moe99 said on October 15th, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​z​R​q​c​f​qiXCX0

    This is way close to my roots in Ohio. And it rings so true of folks that live there, unfor­tu­nately. How ironic that it is Al Jazeera that brings us this report.

  30. Gasman said on October 15th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    mark,
    Yet again, in your quaintly Pali­nesque way, you fail to address the sub­stance of my cri­tique toward McCain.

    Yes, I do have access to a dic­tio­nary. The online ver­sion of Oxford lists the following:

    hyper­bole — exag­ger­ated state­ments or claims not meant to be taken literally.

    irony — the expres­sion of one’s mean­ing by using lan­guage that nor­mally sig­ni­fies the oppo­site, typ­i­cally for humor­ous or emphatic effect.

    So, I gather, based upon the above def­i­n­i­tions that you are sug­gest­ing that McCain is imply­ing the oppo­site of what he has been say­ing? So, accord­ing to the McCain use­age of ironic hyper­bole, Obama IS to be trusted, he DIDN’T asso­ciate with Bill Ayers, McCain really DOES know who the real Bar­rack Obama is, and he did NOT cause the cur­rent finan­cial crisis?

    The trou­ble is with McCain is his that rhetoric changes weekly, or some­times by the hour. There is no con­sis­tency in his pro­nounce­ments, so how do you know what is meant to be taken seri­ously and what is meant to be tongue in cheek? Fur­ther­more, when called upon con­cern­ing his more incen­di­ary remarks or the incit­ing of his mobs, he doesn’t pro­vide a wink-wink-nudge-nudge reac­tion indi­cat­ing it was all meant as a joke. No, he defends his words and his actions. McCain has engaged in utterly, totally rep­re­hen­si­ble behav­ior that can­not be jus­ti­fied, so to avoid the issue, he tries to estab­lish that there is some sort of equiv­a­lent behav­ior from the Obama camp. There is not.

    Please, just once, address the sub­stance in a cri­tique with­out attack­ing the mes­sen­ger. I pointed out another exam­ple of McCain’s galling hypocrisy, which by now are legion in num­ber. You side­stepped McCain’s ridicu­lous claims entirely and chose to mock me instead. You con­tinue to make my point about the sub­stan­tive vacu­ity of the McCain/Palin cam­paign as well as I can myself.

    I didn’t pose it as a ques­tion before, but I will now. Do you sup­port McCain’s state­ments quoted above? Do you think there is sub­stance to McCain’s charges? Can you cite a sin­gle instance that would but­tress his claims?

    I’ll be anx­iously hold­ing my breath while you research your answer.

  31. Dexter said on October 15th, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    moe99: That was almost car­toon­ish, that video…but of course we know many peo­ple feel that way. Let me cheer you up: here in NW Ohio , Obama / Biden yard signs out­num­ber Palin / McCain ( that’s the way she wants the signs to read) at least 3 to 1. Williams County, where I live, always votes 3 – 1 repugg, so this is an amaz­ing situation…I see more and more Obama signs on my daily bicy­cle jaunts.
    As Carville pointed out today on TV, this race will tighten up as elec­tion day nears, HHH closed rapidly and nearly won in ’68, Ford closed quickly and almost beat Carter in ’76.
    It appears this out­come will give us our first Black Pres­i­dent.
    And as Chris Rock sez: “Do NOT expect no Black shit to get done on Novem­ber 5…you’ll carry your own bags that day!!”

  32. Dexter said on October 15th, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    …used to be able to see the Twin Tow­ers from the Tap­pan Zee, 25 miles north of Midtown…we could see the Fort Wayne broad­cast tow­ers nearly 30 miles away from our higher alti­tude home in De Kalb County. Those broad­cast tow­ers were on FWA’s south side.

  33. Dexter said on October 15th, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    CATHERINE: “So, what books get at the heart of Detroit, or Alexan­dria, or any other city?”

    To cap­ture the beauty of Detroit, aer­ial pho­tog­ra­phy works.
    Dale Fisher had a few books printed of his pho­tos , shot from heli­copters. They are dirt cheap now…how cheap? Like a cou­ple bucks!

    http://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Fisher,%20Dale

  34. Linda said on October 15th, 2008 at 5:17 pm

    Let me sec­ond Dex­ter. Here is Toledo, a largely Demo­c­ra­tic town, Obama is doing well, although my neigh­bor believed until just last week that Obama was a Mus­lim (her brother finally set her straight). In past elec­tions, the Ayers stuff would have got­ten much more trac­tion just because peo­ple would have the lux­ury of sweat­ing the small stuff. No more. Real­ity – in the form of a sever eco­nomic down­turn – can trump non­sense sometimes.

  35. moe99 said on October 15th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    Dex­ter, my pater­nal fore­bears were Pauld­ing County res­i­dents (next door to Williams County): my great grand­fa­ther, WH Cullen, was appointed post­mas­ter of Pauld­ing Oh by Theodore Roo­sevelt. It is heart­en­ing to hear your news.

    Edited to fix the county designation

  36. Jolene said on October 15th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    Rolling Stone has yet another Obama cover story. Ambinders calls it “Obama porn”. (Click on the photo to get to the article.)

  37. Dexter said on October 15th, 2008 at 6:16 pm

    LAMary, Rana, Cather­ine… :
    My wife’s cousin recently moved to Chino Hills, (just a few miles SE of Pamona)…Google Earth shows a lot of trees all around Chino Hills…are res­i­dents sub­ject to major fire prob­lems in Chino Hills?

  38. LAMary said on October 15th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

    Dex­ter, it would depend on where in Chino Hills. I think they had some fires there last year. Any newish devel­op­ment that’s sur­rounded by hills with uncleared brush is vulnerable.

  39. joodyb said on October 15th, 2008 at 6:32 pm

    not like David Frum has a con­science. i saw it live. hair-raising. i kept wait­ing for rachel to freak out, but no, of course she con­tin­ued to call him on his accu­sa­tions which he did not answer — it was clear his agenda was to call out msnbc for what he per­ceives to be its smug and flip­pant cov­er­age of the cam­paigns. great tv, if you’ve the stom­ach. if he thought she was so child­ish, why was he talk­ing to her? nobody is THAT tired. he really did him­self a dis­ser­vice, one hopes career­wise as well.

    under­stand mccain pulled ad buys in Wis. this afternoon.

  40. Rana said on October 15th, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    Dex­ter — what LAMary said, with addi­tional caveats if the trees are high-resin ones, like pines or euca­lyp­tus. Your cousin-in-law should look into clear­ing the land around the prop­erty, replac­ing a shake roof if there is one, and mak­ing sure that sparks can’t get in through ven­ti­la­tion fans. (It ought to be pretty easy to Google up spe­cific fire pre­ven­tion dia­grams and check-lists). Tell him/her to watch out espe­cially dur­ing the fall, when you get strong, dry, hot winds mix­ing with summer-dried veg­e­ta­tion. If there’s a time to keep the yard plants irri­gated, that’s it.

  41. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 15th, 2008 at 7:36 pm

    for LA/SoCal/Vegas — Tim Pow­ers: Last Call, Expi­ra­tion Date, Earth­quake Weather (a pecu­liar angle, but quite a view of the region).

    for Indi­anapo­lis — Kurt Von­negut: Palm Sunday

    for Chicago — Nel­son Algren and Studs Terkel: any­thing (and Jean Shep­herd for Da Region to da sou’east)

    Allan Eck­ert has Ohio nailed, but only up to about 1830. Con­tem­po­rary … Mark Wein­gar­dener (sp?) w/ “Crooked River Burn­ing,” and check out Joe Eszter­haz’ non-fiction mem­oirs “Hol­ly­wood Ani­mal,” “Amer­i­can Rhap­sody,” and “Cross­bearer.” There’s an African-American jour­nal­ist who wrote on post-Thurber Colum­bus, and i haven’t tracked him down yet.

  42. Catherine said on October 15th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Dex­ter, what Mary & Rana said, espe­cially about the roof. Chino Hills is pretty recently devel­oped, although it’s right in the mid­dle of built-up areas. Chino Hills State Park is a great big green­space (aka, per­fect place to start a brush­fire) that was for­merly a dairy farm/ranch. It’s like Nancy said, you’re in a fairly dense sub­urb, then you go around the cor­ner and you’re in a Cal­i­for­nia ran­cho from the early 1900s. A lot depends on how far you are from the edge of things — it’s not very nice to view your neigh­bors as a fire­break, but there you go.

  43. Jolene said on October 15th, 2008 at 8:08 pm

    Jeff, were you think­ing of Wil Hay­good? His book is The Hay­goods of Colum­bus: A Love Story. I haven’t read this book, but I’ve read some of his fea­ture arti­cles in the Post, and they were excellent.

  44. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 15th, 2008 at 8:22 pm

    That’s it! Danke schoen.

  45. Catherine said on October 15th, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    Thanks for the read­ing lists!

  46. alex said on October 15th, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    If this is John McCain with the gloves off, it looks like his press-on nails aren’t glued on too well.

  47. derwood said on October 15th, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    Is it just me or is McCain rambling?

  48. basset said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    based on what lit­tle I know from a few vis­its to Detroit and a cou­ple of years upstate, Elmore Leonard appears to have the Motor City totally nailed. have a PDF on my desk­top right now of a piece he did for the Detroit News Sun­day mag­a­zine that is one of the best exam­ples of mag­a­zine writ­ing I have ever run across on any topic, send me your address offlist and I’ll pass it on.

    I would go with Con­rad Richter for the early-settler days Ohio stuff, not famil­iar with Allan Eckert.

    sec­ond the Nel­son Algren, Jean Shep­herd, and Studs Terkel… and add Mike Royko.

  49. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:26 pm

    They say the Daleys still won’t shop at Jewel because their stores had stand-up dis­plays of “Boss” by Royko when it came out — made my aunts shop there all the more.

    Slats Grob­nik, RIP.

    (They should have had a clos­ing debate with 90 min­utes of just the two of ‘em, and elec­tric fences in the wings to keep them on stage for 90 min­utes of face to face, and Schi­ef­fer retreat­ing to the wings to flash the lights if either started to fil­il­buster — and if a run-on state­ment ignored the lights blink­ing, then a bucket of ice water from the rafters. Seri­ously, two of ‘em, no chairs, no table, no podia, just a stage and a split audi­ence free to react to the can­di­dates. IOW, they’re both ram­bling. Like a Ram­bler. With­out power steering.)

  50. alex said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    Sarah Palin has an autis­tic child? Or was McCain merely fum­bling not to say ‘tard?

  51. caliban said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:00 pm

    Pat Buchanon and the other GOP talk­ing heads insist­ing (again) that McCain won the debate and will get a bump. First thing everybodyy’s going to see tomor­row is what McOld­Fart has in com­mon with Ted Stevens:

    http://​voices​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​w​a​s​h​i​n​g​t​o​n​p​o​s​t​i​n​v​e​s​t​i​g​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​2​0​0​8​/​1​0​/​e​x​c​l​u​s​i​v​e​_​v​e​r​i​z​o​n​_​g​a​v​e​_​c​e​l​l​_​t​o.html

    And the story makes it look like Cindy has the First Dudes in that family.

  52. beb said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:22 pm

    When Detroit is in the news, it’s never good news. The Wash­ing­ton Monthly links to an arti­cle on the Free Press about the median price of houses in the city — cur­rently sell­ing for under $10K. Read­ers of the blog were dis­be­liev­ing that hous­ing prices could be that low.

    http://​www​.wash​ing​ton​monthly​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​i​n​d​i​v​i​d​u​a​l​/​2​0​0​8​_​1​0​/​0​1​5​2​02.php

  53. del said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    Alex, that was funny. The best part of the debate was when the mild man­nered Obama called out FOX News. About time.

  54. joodyb said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    What’s funny about the wapo story is the raised hack­les on ‘the cam­paign.’ what clowns. get over report­ing. it’s pub­lic record. if it is true as they say that any­one can solicit such spe­cial­ized cel­lu­lar ser­vice in iso­lated areas, why do they care if it’s in the paper? given facts, read­ers will decide.
    my mind, post-debate, has asploded.

  55. Gasman said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:12 am

    These are the num­bers from FiveThir​tyEight​.com regard­ing debate performance:

    Sur­veyUSA Cal­i­for­nia debate-watchers: Obama 56, McCain 28. Among Cal­i­for­nia inde­pen­dents: Obama 55, McCain 29.

    CNN poll from the tee-vee: Obama 58, McCain 31.

    Medi­aCurves inde­pen­dents: Obama 60, McCain 30.

    CBS unde­cid­eds: Obama 53, McCain 22.

    These num­bers essen­tially mir­ror the pre­vi­ous two debates. McCain can­not claim a clear win. Michelle can start mea­sur­ing the drapes.

  56. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:48 am

    James Fal­lows ana­lyzes the debate here. As always, crisp and incisive.

  57. Dexter said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:25 am

    I am a huge Studs Terkel fan (I’ve blogged here before about how I have met him a few times and he sent me an inscribed book once) , and I love Nel­son Algren’s books and would rec­om­mend them to any­one who wants to jour­ney to the rough side, but we must not for­get Richard Wright’s “Native Son”. You read that book and you will not for­get you read it…it’s pow­er­ful; I’ll go so far as to say it’s as pow­er­ful as Maya Angelou’s “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings”. I read that 38 years ago and I still think about it. The former’s a novel and the lat­ter an auto­bi­og­ra­phy and both should be required read­ing for all of humanity.

  58. Dexter said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:34 am

    Thanks for the tips for my wife’s cuz in Chino Hills.
    He’s an old man liv­ing with younger rel­a­tives in a sort of com­mu­nal arrange­ment and he is not the home owner, but I am gonna send him the info you posted if my wife has his email…hell…now I’m think­ing he’s com­puter illiterate…oh well.

  59. Gasman said on October 16th, 2008 at 2:44 am

    I don’t have cable, so I am some­what behind the curve on watch­ing Olber­mann and Rachel Mad­dow. I just watched the Mad­dow seg­ment regard­ing Palin’s reac­tion to the ethics inves­ti­ga­tion of same:

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​q​n​-​k​X​mjiQCM

    This is more evi­dence of the inabil­ity of Palin (or McCain, see my rants above) to tell the truth. I down­loaded the entire report, and no, it does not exon­er­ate Palin, as she claims. Quite the con­trary, it evis­cer­ates her on her lack of ethics. Poten­tially more trou­bling is Todd Palin’s rogue port­fo­lio which, appar­ently empow­ers him to do what­ever the hell he wants to do, account­able to nobody.

    With her own self appointed inves­ti­ga­tion going awry and, amaz­ingly, the mem­bers of said panel seem­ingly decid­ing to actu­ally inves­ti­gate her, Gov. Palin appears to be in trou­ble. How does she dis­tance her­self from her own “legit­i­mate” inves­ti­ga­tion? Will she refuse to coop­er­ate with this one also? Will she even be in office as Gov­er­nor come inau­gu­ra­tion day? Curi­ouser and curiouser.

  60. Julie Robinson said on October 16th, 2008 at 8:14 am

    Alex, I thought the same thing when McCain kept men­tion­ing autism in regard to Palin’s youngest. Can he not even be both­ered to learn that he has Down’s Syn­drome? I have an adult cousin with Down’s and with all due respect to Sarah Palin, her son is less than a year old and that doesn’t give her very much expertise.

    McCain sounded vague and des­per­ate at the same time. Obama did a good job fend­ing off the per­sonal attacks and urg­ing him to dis­cuss the issues that are so vital today. He took the high road on the vice-presidential ques­tion, when it would have been SO easy to go low.

    It’s thrilling to live in Indi­ana and finally have a vote that mat­ters in the elec­tion. Down­side is all the hor­ri­ble com­mer­cials being run. In the Fort we’re also get­ting the Ohio ads about the propo­si­tion for casi­nos. Maybe a wind­fall profit tax on TV sta­tions could help our economy.

  61. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 8:29 am

    I’ve seen sev­eral peo­ple com­ment­ing on var­i­ous blogs, Julie, about the idea that Sarah Palin hasn’t yet begun to learn what it means to raise a child w/ spe­cial needs. Given that her son doesn’t appear to have any of the crit­i­cal phys­i­cal health prob­lems that Down syn­drome kids some­times have, his cur­rent needs are likely not much dif­fer­ent from those of any other infant. When he gets to be 14 months old and isn’t walk­ing yet, they’ll begin to under­stand. I don’t mean to wish hard­ships on the Palins, but I find it nau­se­at­ing that she’s spo­ken of as if she were both a great expert and a great advo­cate in the realm of spe­cial edu­ca­tion when she is neither.

  62. Dave K. said on October 16th, 2008 at 9:27 am

    CBS Early Show just ran a seg­ment on “Joe The Plumber”. First they said, “Joe thinks the Repub­li­can party has used him as a pawn in the debate.…but he still dis­agrees with Obama’s tax pro­posal…”. The actual inter­view with Joe revealed once again the “Ele­phant in the Liv­ing Room” which unfor­tu­nately con­tin­ues to influ­ence this elec­tion. Joe: “…so I decided to ask some ques­tions myself and unfor­tu­nately, he tap-danced around it, almost as good as Sammy Davis Jr.…”.

    I saw the video of Barack’s answer and I thought he answered the ques­tion very directly. The “Sammy Davis Jr.”, racist atti­tude is alive and kick­ing out there. Obama’s lead in the polls is still grow­ing but I cer­tainly won’t feel com­fort­able until he is sworn in as Pres­i­dent of the United States.

  63. John said on October 16th, 2008 at 9:33 am

    Hey, even Archie Bunker loved Sammy!

  64. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 9:52 am

    And Sammy was a good tap-dancer. But, I agree, Dave. This can’t be over soon enough for me.

  65. brian stouder said on October 16th, 2008 at 10:08 am

    Well, on the sub­ject of tim­ing, one bit of cos­mic jus­tice is that this crash/meltdown/recession can­NOT be blamed on ‘Pres­i­dent Obama’s woe­ful mis­man­age­ment and out-moded left­ist dogma’ (etc etc).

    The rightwing lip flap­pers would have instantly and intractably pro­claimed and reit­er­ated (for­ever and always) that this crash was ENTIRELY the fault of Obama’s sorry-assed lead­er­ship, if it occurred on Jan­u­ary 22, 2009 .…whereas, in actual fact, they are all muted at the moment, with dark ref­er­ences to ‘the late unpleas­ant­ness’ and how it is all so unfair to McCain’s chances — as if this cri­sis fell out of the sky the way Dorothy’s Kansas farm­house smashed the Wicked Witch of the East (well, maybe they wouldn’t com­pare McCain to the Wicked Witch of the West’s sis­ter, but I will!!).

    The only ques­tion is, how many sec­onds after Pres­i­dent Obama com­pletes his inau­gural address before Uncle Rush/Human Events/Weekly Standard/Sh*t-for-brains-Sean/NRO/etc etc retroac­tively and ex post facto blame IT ALL on Obama?

    My open­ing bet is — 34.5 seconds

  66. moe99 said on October 16th, 2008 at 10:15 am

    http://​hel​lotxt​.com/​l/b0fS

    appar­ently not pho­to­shopped post debate pic

  67. Jolene said on October 16th, 2008 at 10:22 am

    Brian, clearly you lack the imag­i­na­tion to be a true right-wing crank. Were you such a vision­ary, you’d real­ize that the sell-off in the mar­ket is occur­ring because peo­ple rec­og­nize that Obama is going to nation­al­ize all our indus­tries, impose con­fis­ca­tory tax laws, and send cap­i­tal­ists to re-education camps. As for the past, well, all those prob­lems in the hous­ing mar­ket are a con­se­quence of left-wing sen­a­tors leg­is­la­tors who forced banks to issue loans to poor black peo­ple who couldn’t afford to pay them back.

  68. Kirk said on October 16th, 2008 at 10:36 am

    Jolene, don’t for­get to men­tion that those non-white peo­ple have smaller brains that pre­vent them from know­ing that they’re buy­ing some­thing they can’t afford.

  69. brian stouder said on October 16th, 2008 at 10:43 am

    Jolene, your obser­va­tion about the right has the ring of truth.

    As an aside to last night’s debate, I was very impressed by….Walmart’s com­mer­cials! Say what you will about that enter­prise in gen­eral, but their ads struck me as laser-like; they make an unadorned and unam­bigu­ous eco­nomic pitch (one-stop shop­ping for many dif­fer­ent things, and low prices at that), and they look to me to be just spot-on with our cur­rent, tur­bu­lent times.

    Even if you think Wal­Mart is a weed-like cor­po­ra­tion, still one has to rec­og­nize the hearti­ness and adapt­abil­ity of weeds!

  70. coozledad said on October 16th, 2008 at 10:46 am

    I was try­ing to come up with a way to watch the debate last night that enabled me to see it through a more empathic lens for John McCain. The best strat­egy I could come up with was to try and cast it as a debate between Hugh Grant and myself about who gets more pussy.
    I still think I’d be a more ami­able loser.

    Hugh Grant-99
    Coozledad-.03

  71. Dwight said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    Journos putting words in someone’s mouth is one of my all time pet peeves, espe­cially local tv news reporters try­ing to draw out a man-on-the street interview.

    “So, would you say this was the most ter­ri­fy­ing fire you’ve ever witnessed?”

    Gah. Why don’t you just inter­view your­self, Copernicus?

    I think about the story of Don Hewitt pre­view­ing one of Mike Wallace’s 60 min­utes pieces in the edit­ing room. One of the B-roll shots was of a spin­ning revolv­ing door on a NY building.

    “Was that door really spin­ning by itself when you shot the footage? Or did some­body on the crew spin it for effect?” Hewitt asks.

    “I spun it,” says the producer.

    “Then cut that shot,” says Hewitt.

    That said.… No sane per­son con­sid­ers Rush Lim­baugh, Sean Han­nity, Rachel Mad­dow, or Keith Ober­mann a jour­nal­ist. Those cre­den­tials are hereby forfeited.

  72. brian stouders said on October 16th, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Those cre­den­tials are hereby forfeited.

    True enough, as far as that goes. But these per­son­ages are arche­typ­i­cal Amer­i­can muck­rak­ers and opin­ion lead­ers, and it would be a mis­take to sim­ply dis­re­gard what they’re croak­ing about, I think.

  73. joodyb said on October 16th, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    good photo post, moe. i was afraid i’d get caught last night if i posted from AP — there’s another hilar­i­ous sim­i­lar one of him with Cindy. what’s up with his tongue?

  74. Ricardo said on October 19th, 2008 at 12:29 am

    It was just about 1 year exactly since I posted my last Santa Ana wind report. This year it was short, only two days (so far). It was trash day so all of my recy­cle items, mostly boxes, were strewn all over my neighbor’s yard. The tree that many branches blew into my other neighbor’s yard was removed a few months ago. Also, my avo­cado tree that lost all of its fruit and blos­soms last year, bore no fruit this year. I used to like Santa Ana winds, but they have become more fierce and destruc­tive over the years. Chalk it up to global warming.