nancynall.com » My so-called life.

My so-called life.

ebonyivory
Ebony and ivoreeee live together in per­fect har-mo-neeeee side by side on my formica kitchen table, oh lord, why don’t weeeeee?

For the record, I thought the grilled-cheese sand­wich thread was hilar­i­ous. Tacos. Ha. Oth­er­wise I didn’t keep up with much news yes­ter­day. My day was full to the brim with activ­ity and hostess­ing, so I didn’t really learn about the Holo­caust Museum shoot­ing until this morn­ing, not to men­tion the David Let­ter­man ker­fuf­fle among the right­blog­gers, and you know what? There’s noth­ing like a day away from the news to let you know what’s impor­tant. Of course, any day that begins with a trip to one of the auto­mo­tives is always well-spent, espe­cially when they take you dri­ving on one of their prov­ing grounds. You learn the most amus­ing things, like the names of cer­tain stretches of test pave­ment — “sine wave,” for instance, and “pitch and jounce.”

But the best thing was the entrance and exit ramps, which were banked. Seri­ously banked. Noth­ing like fly­ing through a banked turn to make you say wheeee.

Then it was lunch in Mex­i­can­town and a stop at the Hon­ey­bee Mar­ket for man­gos, and home to make agua fresca and wait for John and Sam. The New York Times fea­tured agua fresca in its Recipes for Health col­umn a few days back, Laura Lipp­man Face­booked it and cred­ited it with all sort of miracle-working pow­ers, so I thought, OK, I’ll bite. I even made two pitch­ers — one mango, one water­melon. And both were fab­u­lous, but the mango went dry first. I’m old enough to have rel­a­tives who think a mango is a green pep­per, and here they are, years later, read­ily avail­able in any old Kroger. I think, how long did Latin Amer­ica keep these fruits to them­selves, and can we bring action for this in some sort of inter­na­tional court?

I also think: You know what would go well with this? A shot of vodka.

Tip: Make it with the smaller, yel­low man­goes. They’re sweeter. Although I’m sure the big red ones would work splen­didly, too. You really can’t go wrong with man­goes.

Agua fresca was only one thing on the menu, how­ever. The other bev­er­age was wine, which may explain why I for­got to make a salad. Also, one of my stu­dents stopped by — long story, not inter­est­ing — and when he left, his clutch failed, so there was 10 min­utes spend bleed­ing the air out of some­thing under the hood, and long story short, din­ner was sort of a blur. But a fun blur! Who cares when your friends are in your kitchen?

Oh, and for all you Detroit haters? The car with the bum clutch was a Honda.

After din­ner we ate ice cream and watched the first two episodes of “Nurse Jackie.” Edie Falco is great, isn’t she? They really worked to wash the Carmela off of her — that frosted-tips hair­cut is just inspired — although her scrub tops looks suspiciously…fitted. But she tran­scends the cos­tume, I’d say. Our one-year arrange­ment with Com­cast expires in August, at which time I fig­ured I’d boot Show­time and Starz, the two pre­mium chan­nels they threw in gratis when we switched our phone ser­vice. Not being a fan of either “Dex­ter” or “Weeds,” I thought this would be easy to do. Now? Damn.

So what hap­pened in your neck of the woods yes­ter­day?

If you didn’t see Connie’s husband’s heron pic­tures, you are miss­ing a treat. Big file, long down­load even in broad­band, absolutely worth the wait.

Look, the museum shooter thinks the pres­i­dent isn’t a natural-born cit­i­zen. How shocked I am to learn this.

And now I am off. But I’ll be back.

59 responses to
“My so-called life.”

  1. Connie said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    Thanks for the link Nancy. To me the most amaz­ing thing is that the heron pics were shot in the cen­ter of the city, just two blocks from my office. Guess it helps to have two rivers down­town.

    I live with a 59 yr old guy who has a 13 yr old boy brain in many ways, and, well I just knew I didn’t need to read the grilled cheese thing.

  2. Deborah said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    I love man­gos. I grew up in Miami, FL so nat­u­rally we had a tree in our back­yard, every­one did. It seems like mango sea­son lasted all year, but I was a kid so every­thing seemed bound­less. all our neigh­bors were try­ing to get rid of man­gos, tak­ing large paper bags of them to work but nobody wanted them because they all had their own to get rid of. My fam­ily moved to FL from Iowa so we thought man­gos were very exotic. I remem­ber my mother brag­ging to her sis­ter that Jackie Kennedy said the pres liked to have man­gos with his break­fast occa­sion­ally and here we had them ever­day.

  3. Dorothy said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:41 am

    How the heck did you get to see two episodes of Nurse Jackie? I thought only one was out so far? I’m jeal­ous.

    Didja see the pos­i­tively creepy mugshot of Phil Spec­tor? No won­der he wears those ugly wigs: http://​blogs​.usato​day​.com/​.​a​/​6​a​0​0​d​8​3​4​5​1​b​4​6​2​6​9​e​2​0​1​1​5​7​0​e​f​a​6​5​1​9​70b-pi

  4. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    My mom used to always drink Fresca.

  5. beb said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    Cal­gon, I mean, Nancy, take me away…. I just dis­cov­ered that, accord­ing to my insur­ance com­pany, I was born on the wrong day. I’m feel­ing a lit­tle dis­ap­ated right now. Do I even exist. Was Franz Kafka chan­nel­ing my life?

    Let­ter­man should have known that it’s not right to make jokes of the chil­dren of politi­cians. But then, too, he was obvi­ously jok­ing about the knocked up one, not her younger sis­ter. As for “slutty air­line atten­dent make-up” f it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it can’t com­plain if son­me­one makes a duck joke at their expense.

  6. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    I enjoy David Let­ter­man a great deal and have always pre­ferred his more acidic approach to things over Jay Leno’s nice guy per­sona, but I’m dis­ap­pointed he went for such an easy cheap shot on Sarah Palin in his Top Ten list.

    Now that she’s a pub­lic fig­ure, she is fair game, and there is plenty about this intel­lec­tual and polit­i­cal light­weight to mock. Her sense of enti­tle­ment, her tor­tured logic, her inabil­ity to speak in com­plete sen­tences, her shock­ingly shal­low world view, etc.

    The good gov­er­nor is a walk­ing “tar­get rich envi­ron­ment,” as old Rummy would say. Focus­ing on her looks is truly the lazy writer’s way out.

  7. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    In the morn­ing, I lis­ten to WOWO for traf­fic and news and Char­lie Butcher – who bugged me 30 years ago when I was rid­ing to high school, but who has since grown on me. By way of say­ing, when I roll off to lunch at about 12:30 each day, the radio starts right up on WOWO, and I hear Uncle Rush ful­mi­nat­ing about what­ever the hell. Often, I let him have his say until he makes me cuss, and THEN I switch away. As Keith Olber­mann pointed out yes­ter­day, I can attest that at just about the same moment a secu­rity guard at a museum(!!) was being mur­dered by a hate-filled man who thinks the pres­i­dent isn’t a natural-born cit­i­zen, Uncle Rush was mak­ing the exact same “point”.

    So we have free-floating anti-semitism (per­son­i­fied by the remorse­less shooter), con­spir­a­to­r­ial stage whis­pers and lunatic rav­ings from radio lip-flappers, and oh-by-the-way old fash­ioned racist impulses (the shooter aimed his open­ing shots at the armed black man). I agree that the left­wing fever swamps are sore losers when ‘their side’ loses; hell, a num­ber of the fever-swampers on the left aren’t happy with Pres­i­dent Obama’s WIN! But what makes the rightwing fever-swampers so damned vio­lent? Good Christ! You lost! Get over it!! Here’s a thought – maybe even work on doing bet­ter next time!! I think we, here, can all agree that the panic gun-buying/ammo stock-piling, end-of-days think­ing, spu­ri­ous super­sti­tions sup­ple­ment­ing schtick that Fox News and broad­cast radio cvhurns out every­day is, at best, unhealthy. After­all, the left wing fever swamps – the ones that are as stri­dent as Rush and Sean and Glen – are in internet-land, and not on MSNBC or broad­cast radio.

    Or, maybe we can­not agree about that.

  8. Connie said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    Was your prov­ing ground trip to Mil­ford? My brother-in-law is a third shift test dri­ver there, and tells great sto­ries. My fave had to do with run­ning a Corvette on the cob­ble­stone road track. Also sto­ries about the 17 employee deaths on the site over the years. He also says he’s not offi­cially a dri­ver, he is some­thing like an engineer’s test­ing assis­tant.

  9. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    Brian,

    From your lip’s to God’s ear. We only hear about the main­stream loud­mouths with the big con­tracts: Lim­baugh, Han­nity, Beck, O’Reilly, et​.al. You’re quite right that there is a sub-group that is fur­ther under­ground, oper­at­ing on the Inter­net and short­wave radio. One of these creeps, Hal Turner, is not that far afield from the shooter at the Holo­caust Museum and he has turned up more than once on Hannity’s pro­gram.

    The bas­tard who killed a secu­rity guard in D.C. yes­ter­day was a long-time Holo­caust denier and white suprema­cist, but also a mem­ber of the so-called “birther ele­ment,” which believes Pres­i­dent Obama is not eli­gi­ble for office because he actu­ally was born in Kenya. He is as far right as you can get. So, nat­u­rally, last night Glenn Beck assured his audi­ence that this guy was a “lone nut­case.” Beck also insisted his daily dose of rhetor­i­cal gaso­line could not pos­si­bly influ­ence creeps like the Nazi wor­ship­per who pulled the trig­ger in D.C. Beck is pre­dict­ing more of this kind of vio­lence because “the pot is boil­ing” in Amer­ica while refus­ing to acknowl­edge he helps sup­ply the heat.

    The Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity direc­tive warn­ing of out­breaks of far rightwing vio­lence looks incred­bly pre­scient.

  10. LAMary said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    NPR had a story about Indian man­gos this morn­ing which has inspired me to seek out a mango tree to plant in my yard. Here you can buy man­gos at the end of free­way ramps. My local mango guy gets six to ten bucks a box for man­gos or papayas, depend­ing on how much he wants to get off the free­way ramp. He’s got straw­ber­ries and those per­fect look­ing half sized bananas right now too.

  11. Catherine said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Aguas fres­cas are God’s gift. Try cucum­ber: http://​tinyurl​.com/​mas78n

    Hor­chata, too, but not as healthy.

  12. nancy said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    If you have on-demand cable, the upcom­ing episode is avail­able a week early. They some­times do this with buzz-y shows like “The Wire.”

  13. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Ok, let’s get this over with, because you know it’s going to be part of the non-mango discussion/argument even­tu­ally: Rev. Jere­miah Wright is blam­ing “Them Jews” for keep­ing him away from Obama.
    http://​www​.chicagotri​bune​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​n​a​t​i​o​n​w​o​r​l​d​/​c​h​i​-​w​r​i​g​h​t​_​1​1​j​u​n​1​1​,​0​,​5​5​3​2​8​7​9​.story

  14. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Ok, let’s get this over with

    Well, Jere­miah Wright is an idiot. Done!

    (and if Jere­miah Wright’s views must be ascribed to Pres­i­dent Obama, and ippso-facto Obama is an anti-Semite and there­fore attached to the museum shooter -

    then indeed all who go to churchs that are anti-abortion are sim­i­larly attached to the domes­tic ter­ror­ist shoot­ers of doc­tors and bombers of clin­ics!)

  15. Joe Kobiela said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    Jeff and Brian,
    Why no out­rage from the media about the sol­dier mur­dered last week? He was gunned down by a jerk that has been quoted as say­ing it was jus­ti­fied, because we are killing women and chil­dren in Mus­lim nations. Why does it seem so one sided in the media?
    Pilot Joe

  16. LAMary said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    I don’t know what media you’re read­ing, Joe, but I’ve seen only con­dem­na­tion of his actions.

  17. James said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Joe:

    If you mean, why no cov­er­age, then you haven’t been read­ing the right papers. Why no out­rage? I don’t want the media feed­ing me out­rage… just news.

    Can you give us an exam­ple of what you’re talk­ing about?

  18. Joe Kobiela said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I guess to me it seems that when some­thing hap­pens to some­one like Dr Tiller or this deal with the guy in D.C. peo­ple are quick to point out that the killers were right wing lean­ing. Then Rush and Beck are brought up along with O’Rielly, like some how it’s their fault, but no one in the media attempts to make a con­nec­tion between this killer and the left.
    I just wish the cov­er­age was not so bias, accord­ing to the fac­tor last night, the Tiller killing gen­er­ated a 10-1 story count over the sol­diers mur­der.
    Pilot Joe

  19. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Joe, it’s pos­si­ble that some of the 10-1 story count is because Tiller’s mur­derer has, against his attorney’s advice, spo­ken repeat­edly to the press. The man who killed the sol­dier appears, at the moment any­way, to be hon­or­ing a gag order that was issued at the request of the pros­e­cu­tor who stated that he wanted to pro­tect the man’s right to a fair trial.
    http://​www​.google​.com/​h​o​s​t​e​d​n​e​w​s​/​a​p​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​A​L​e​q​M​5​g​Q​A​C​N​s​h​V​F​Y​t​6​M​9​C​D​y​k​H​q​6​D​K​q​P​h​i​w​D​9​8​NIFVO0

  20. Scout said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Good ques­tion Pilot Joe. Why is it, indeed? Why is it that peo­ple like O’Reilly, Beck, Lim­baugh, Han­nity, Scar­bor­ough, et al con­tinue to dom­i­nate the national soap­box to spew their dog whis­tled calls for vio­lence? Why ARE things so one-sided?

    And address­ing your other ques­tion – who in the so-called one sided media expressed an opin­ion that led to incit­ing the mil­i­tary shooter to vio­lence? Who specif­i­cally?

    There is a dif­fer­ence between fac­tual report­ing and a drum­beat of right wing idiocy that con­stantly pounds out stuff like the rhetoric that Obama is not a cit­i­zen, Obama is going to take your guns, Obama is a social­ist, and on and on.

    All these recent vio­lent deaths are tragic, but what makes the PA cop mur­ders, the Tiller mur­der and the Holo­caust Museum mur­der even more so is that the shoot­ers were dri­ven by rage talk that seems to esca­late daily from the mouths of right wing pun­dits with national mega­phones.

  21. basset said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Did they men­tion “tum­ble­home,” Nance? for some rea­son that term sticks with me.

    and I sus­pect “slutty flight atten­dant” will too.

  22. James said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Joe:

    There’s no evi­dence that the killer of the sol­dier was left-leaning. Where’d you get that from? A rad­i­cal­ized Mus­lim man might be described many ways, but left-leaning is not one of them.

  23. LAMary said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    I think Ms Palin DOES look like a slutty flight atten­dant. It’s that “bronzer under the cheek­bones” look paired with her hairdo.

  24. Dorothy said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    I com­pletely for­got about the on-demand cable thing. We had that when we lived in South Car­olina.

  25. coozledad said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Appar­ently a num­ber of wingers, in another dis­play of infan­til­ism and pro­jec­tion, have tried to paint Von Brunn as a lefty. Here’s the refu­ta­tion, in case any of the ass­wipes have pulled their hands from over their ears:
    http://​www​.talk​ing​pointsmemo​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​n​o​t​e​_​f​o​u​n​d​_​i​n​_​v​o​n​_​b​r​u​n​n​s​_​c​ar.php
    So now Obama’s a mem­ber of the inter­na­tional Jew­ish con­spir­acy, as well as a Mus­lim Com­muno­fas­cist Illu­mi­nati scary black dude baby killer.
    I don’t know how he finds the time.

  26. ROgirl said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    He may have been a “lone nut­case,” but con­sider these recent events: the guy who killed the Wes­leyan stu­dent in May wrote about a killing spree tar­get­ing Jews, and the foiled plot to blow up the syn­a­gogues in the Bronx.

    When Obama came into office the haters and cra­zies took it as a sign to ramp up the para­noia and act on it, egged on by the foam­ing fear-mongering of the right-wing media enter­tain­ers.

    I have to say, I won­der what ever drew Obama to Jere­miah Wright.

  27. JRG said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I’ve just been card-shopping on Etsy and came across one that one of you lovers of the Great Lakes might like.

  28. JRG said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Joe, that soldier’s death was as much of a loss and as much of a tragedy as the other hor­ri­ble inci­dents we’ve expe­ri­enced recently, but there are lots of rea­sons it hasn’t got­ten the same play in the press. Unlike Tiller, the vic­tim wasn’t a high-profile fig­ure asso­ci­ated with a hot-button polit­i­cal issue. Unlike yesterday’s shoot­ing, the site of the Arkansas shoot­ing is not a shrine ded­i­cated to teach­ing about and try­ing to pre­vent the kind of hatred reflected in the shoot­ing, much less a shrine located in one of the nation’s media cap­i­tals.

    And then, as James says, rad­i­cal jihadism is not a key plank in the plat­form of the polit­i­cal left.

  29. JRG said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    As usual, LAMary, you’ve put your fin­ger on exactly the right details–definitely the bronzer, but espe­cially the hairdo.

  30. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    and not for noth­ing, but our ‘main­stream media’ DOES ascribe rad­i­cal atti­tudes to mideast media (al Jazeera, et al) and loud­mouthed (and loathe­some) devil-may-care pro­nounce­ments from unaccountable-to-anyone-else Mul­lahs.

    Our rad­i­cal­ized jihadists have their media, and our dis-satisfied fel­low coun­try­men have theirs, too.

    edit- the old joke about slutty flight atten­dants was the one liner: “Cof­fee, milk, or TWA tea?”

  31. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    JRG: that post­card looks like it has a fancy ver­sion of the SS Bad­ger on it. Thanks.
    Brian: Edit – that was yesterday’s topic. I think.

  32. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Putting the lie to the lat­est rightwing canard( if you haven’t heard it yet, you will):

    http://​firstread​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​1​9​6​1​4​2​2.aspx

    an excerpt:

    An arti­cle in the Weekly Stan­dard says the Obama admin­is­tra­tion has ordered a change in pol­icy, requir­ing agents to give Miranda warn­ings to all detainees. In fact, agents have from time to time given Miranda warn­ings to some detainees who, it’s thought, might end up being pros­e­cuted in U.S. courts. This began in the last admin­is­tra­tion.

    The infec­tious rumi­na­tions of right­ward Swine con­tinue their unabated spread (our local radio lip-flapper is in high dud­geon over this, and has spent the past half hour whip­ping peo­ple up)

  33. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Joe,

    I believe your points already have been refuted, but it bears repeat­ing: There is noth­ing on the left side of the radio or tele­vi­sion dial that even comes close to the kinds of rhetoric reg­u­larly thrown around by the blovi­a­tors of the right.

    If Rachel Mad­dow or Keith Olber­man or Ed Schultz or Stephanie Miller were reg­u­larly refer­ring to our armed forces as ene­mies and urg­ing their lis­ten­ers and view­ers onward with vicious, elim­i­na­tion­ist rhetoric, you’d have a point. But they don’t and you don’t.

    It’s not like this is any­thing new, Joe. I believe it was dur­ing the Clin­ton Admin­is­tra­tion years that G. Gor­don Liddy –now there’s a great Amer­i­can hero if ever there were one– advised his lis­ten­ers that if any fed­eral agents ever came call­ing, to aim for the head because they all wore bullet-proof vests.

  34. Joe Kobiela said on June 11th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    I have never heard O’Riely Rush Han­nity or Beck, Tell any­one to use vio­lence
    If you have show me where.
    Pilot Joe

  35. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

  36. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    No Brian, what Joe is look­ing for is one of these folks say­ing “I want you to go out there and kill [fill in the blank]“. Which you will not hear. Should any of them say that, they would not have any cover when some­thing hap­pens. Although I did like the part about Abra­ham Lin­coln dis­lik­ing Tim­o­thy Gei­th­ner.
    Joe, be fair. When O’Reilly says “And if the state of Kansas doesn’t stop this man, then any­body who pre­vents that from hap­pen­ing has blood on their hands as the gov­er­nor does right now, Gov­er­nor Sebe­lius” and “Kansas is a great state, but this is a dis­grace upon every­one who lives in Kansas”, do you not think that he might, just might, be engag­ing in behav­ior designed to incite hatred and vio­lence? And doing it in front of a large fan base?

  37. Hexdecimal said on June 11th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Brian – I too have to call you on this one. It has noth­ing to do with Joes request. The Rush piece only men­tions killing in the title – “Obama Wants to Chan­nel Your Anger Toward Killing Cap­i­tal­ism”. The rest of the piece is a rant, for sure, but no where is it even close to what one would con­sider hate speech.

    Actu­ally, the piece was funny in sev­eral places. When he ref­er­ences the teleprompter as the one telling Obama [the speech] he harkens back to when folks were say­ing it was Dick Cheney who was the pup­pet mas­ter (with his arm stuffed up Bush’s ass). I believe Obama comes out the win­ner because at least the teleprompter can sting together two or more coher­ent sen­tences with the cor­rect enun­ci­a­tion.

  38. Dexter said on June 11th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Cable TV…Since Time Warner took Sun­dance away from me , then (after FORTY phone calls!) said I could get it back, but it would cost me another ten bucks a month, I thought I had bet­ter not go ahead and order Shotime, like I wanted to.
    It makes me laugh to see these ads for DishTV —” $9.99 for three months!” is the lat­est, when I have to pay more than that for ONE extra pre­mium chan­nel.
    I dumped DirecTV after 11 years when I found out I could have been get­ting local chan­nels for years, but my receiver was obso­lete, but nobody ever told me, no emails, no mailings…and I was pay­ing the local cable provider almost $700 a year all that time for pro­gram­ming I should have been receiv­ing from my satel­lite dish. The cable com­pany made me get a full pack­age of chan­nels if I wanted broad­band. I was pay­ing for the same sta­tions on both DirecTV and cable. Then I was lied to by DirecTV for the last time when they told me local chan­nels were not avail­able in my area…when they in fact were, indeed.
    Did I tell yas about my “free insta­la­tion”? $450 it cost me cuz I had three TVs. Now they adver­tise 4 rooms for free. Do not believe them.

  39. moe99 said on June 11th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    http://​www​.salon​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​5​/​3​1​/​t​iller/

    Bill O’Reilly on Tiller is the same effect as using a dog whis­tle on a dog. All the right words are there to incite some­one, any­one to kill him. Just not said directly so O’Reilly can dis­claim respon­si­bil­ity. Very clev­erly done. May he rot in hell.

  40. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Since we began with riffs on the brain­less and irri­tat­ing Gov. Palin, let’s not for­get that this overly ambi­tious polit­i­cal hack spent much of the final months of last fall’s cam­paign claim­ing that Pres­i­dent Obama “paled (or palled??) around with ter­ror­ists” and that the only “real Amer­i­cans” could be found in small towns. Her cam­paign rhetoric was so extreme, even McCain had to work to damp it down.

  41. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Dex­ter – we spent 10 or 11 years with Dish, after dump­ing Com­cast cable in the wake of one of their end­less rate increases.

    We were happy with Dish – but our equip­ment had worn out, too. We had found Dish remotes on E-Bay, but the receivers were giv­ing up the ghost, plus we noticed (as you did) that the newer deals were much more capa­ble, and for a bit less than we were pay­ing.

    We called them to asked for new equip­ment, and they tried to tell us how much it would cost….and to make a long story short, we fired them.

    And THEN – then and only then – they SUDDENLY were will­ing to make con­ces­sions!

    To make a long story short, THAT’S when we learned that the very first card you play with these folks is – can­cel the ser­vice. Then, the pow­er­less tele­phone per­son hands you off to a super­vi­sor, and things begin to hap­pen.

    We’ve been with DirecTV for sev­eral years, and we noted they were offer­ing a very nice deal (DVR/low rates, etc) for new cus­tomers, so we con­tacted them and informed them that we were tem­i­nat­ing the ser­vice unless we got the new stuff, too – and voila!

  42. coozledad said on June 11th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

  43. joodyb said on June 11th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    Brian, the ‘new cus­tomer’ pol­icy is squishy in all mar­kets. fact is, they have to offer you the same price, but most cus­tomers never call them on it. we had the same issue with Com­cast (nee Time­Warner). I had a grand­fa­thered rate for cable/broadband bun­dle. when Com­cast came to town, they tried to tell me i couldn’t have it any­more. i said “fine, turn it off. at my age, i’ve paid tens of thou­sands for cable ser­vice. you should be ashamed of your­selves.” I got a let­ter the next week, all sta­tus quo.
    any­one can cut a deal. most peo­ple just don’t know to do it.

  44. Dexter said on June 11th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    yeah brian st.—we get DirecTV mail­ings twice a week beg­ging us to come back.
    I mean, after all, I paid them $98 a month for 11 and a half years, I bought my own equip­ment back then, (before they stopped that) and I enjoyed trouble-free ser­vice for years. You’ve seen the ads for cable that brag they never lose sig­nal “like satel­lite does”? Well, Time Warner is always going off line! Almost every week we have outages…just today, CNN was off all morn­ing, along with about 20 other channels…complain? Why? “…no dis­counts off your bill unless we are off 24 hours straight.”
    There’s just no easy way at all.
    brian? How about a Fort Wayne Tin Caps update…like the sta­dium? park­ing rea­son­able? Dol­lar hot dogs and peanuts?

  45. alex said on June 11th, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    Pilot Joe isn’t worth argu­ing with. I started a long, well-reasoned post ear­lier today and after almost fin­ish­ing it I just deleted the whole damned thing because it’s lost on him any­way.

    Just like the fol­low­ing is surely lost on devout right-wingers. But it’s bring­ing tears to my eyes.

    http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​z​a​h​r​a​-​r​a​h​n​a​v​a​r​d​-​i​r​a​n​i​a​n​s​_​n​_​2​1​4​5​5​4.html

    EDIT: And it’s “writ­ten in the sky.” Kind of like our recent elec­tion:

    http://​www​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​o​p​i​n​i​o​n​/​1​1​i​h​t​-​e​d​c​o​h​e​n​.​h​t​m​l?_r=1

    Ain’t just the Amer­i­can mul­lahs run­ning scared these days.

  46. Kevin Knuth said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

  47. basset said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    I started to get Bell­South DSL back when I upgraded from dialup… only live about a half-mile from the switch so I fig­ured it’d be no prob­lem, they had a free-hookup spe­cial so I called.

    Turns out it was free if you had a PC, $100 for a Mac. Told them we’d do it our­selves, we know how, really… no, still $100. Went to Com­cast, not out­stand­ing ser­vice but it works most of the time.

  48. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Mar­velous story, Alex, as is the link i found in the side­bar — http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​a​m​y​-​s​i​s​k​i​n​d​/​s​e​x​i​s​m​-​a​g​a​i​n​s​t​-​c​o​n​s​e​r​v​a​t​i​_​b​_​2​1​4​2​4​8.html

    The descrip­tive rhetoric used for Sarah Palin, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clin­ton, and yes, even Ann Coul­ter (“her bony clav­i­cle” — i mean, c’mon, who else always gets this kind of detailed mock­ing phys­i­cal descrip­tion in polit­i­cal cov­er­age?) is just ridicu­lous. Mock­ing Rush’s girth is fair because he is a kind of sideshow clown and so it comes with the ter­rain, but Palin’s detrac­tors would have pro­voked Mar­garet Mead to leap to her defense. Appar­ently women have to be safely, markedly post-menopausal to avoid the hyper-sexualized mock­ery that is so nor­mal­ized in polit­i­cal chat­ter.

    Roger Ebert’s blog­ging has been a real gift to me in recent months, but his thrice affirmed links to a buddy who has painted a puerile nude of Alaska’s gov­er­nor: what in heaven’s name is that about? What’s it got to do with any­thing, other than “non-aged pow­er­ful woman we don’t agree with — quick, take her clothes off in pub­lic to put her in her place!”

    I just don’t get the left’s fas­ci­na­tion with get­ting Palin’s clothes off, or their obses­sion with the fact that she doesn’t look like Phyl­lis Schlafly. She looks like eight of the last ten women i talked to today, the two excep­tions being heav­ily tat­tooed and some­what under­dressed even for a June day. None of whom i’d call a slutty flight atten­dant, and none of whom i’d dare make jokes about the avail­abil­ity of their 14 year old daugh­ters . . . and that’s who was with her at Yan­kee Sta­dium, as the NYTimes had clearly noted that day, so if Dave’s joke was about the daugh­ter who was at the ball park, then he just can’t say “well, well, hey, i meant the one that’s slutty, any­one can tell that’s what i would have meant if i’d been think­ing about it.”

    Yeah, i *really* like Dave telling us who he can and can’t joke about “get­ting knocked up with a ballplayer.” Palin over-reacted? That’s not what any mom with a 14 year old daugh­ter would say that i know.

    Can’t y’all go back to mak­ing fun of pilonoidal cysts and Mark Levin’s voice? It would be mildly infan­tile, but fair enough; this glee­ful cheap shot­ting of the Palins is really mak­ing some of you sound merely silly as you try to call foul balls as “in bounds.” Now, mock­ing Goe­glein — well in bounds. Take your base.

  49. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    By the way, Jon Stew­art has been strik­ingly fair and rea­son­able as he tees off on Sarah Palin, so it clearly isn’t “can’t talk about her if you can’t mock her looks.”

    The most fair and bal­anced broad­caster on TV!

  50. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    Dex­ter – I con­fess I haven’t ven­tured into Parkview Field yet. The kids and I drove past when a game was going, and could feel the elec­tric­ity.

    Any­way, if we don’t get in there sooner, Pam and I will be a com­pany event there July 15 (extra good seats, plus food and good­ies), and I’ll give you a full report!

    KK’s Goe­glein alert was pretty funny to read; thanks!

    And ALex – those Iran pieces are good stuff. I’ve been tak­ing in the hope­ful pic­tures and such from there – of throngs in the streets…and I’m work­ing not to get my hopes up. But indeed, and with all due cau­tion and so on – I think it wouldn’t be too much to say that if the Iran­ian elec­torate responds – in the com­ing hours – to what the Amer­i­can elec­torate did last Novem­ber (and dumps Nutjob), I’m going to have some seri­ous pollyanna reac­tions about how folks are folks the world over, etc etc.

  51. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    Jeff tmmo – let me leap to say that I am in com­plete agree­ment with you about Letterman/Palin.

    Letterman’s style of humor has really never appealed to me, and his bash­ing of Palin’s daugh­ter was meanly stu­pid.

    And – I think the Palin family’s response has been more com­posed and rea­son­able than the Stouder family’s would have been, if the lanky come­dian (who lives in a moral glass house, too) had slimed our daugh­ters. Just sayin’

  52. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    Stew­art is jok­ing with Katie Couric about some­thing that our local net­work news is, in fact, doing — “news bingo, then they can win stuff!” NBC4 is doing key words in the news­casts (i call them, gen­er­ously), and when you have enough key words on your reg­is­tered pro­file, you can “win stuff.”

    Sorry, Jon, as Tom Lehrer said, it gets harder and harder to do satire (Lehrer said, with­out a smile, that he quit the satire biz when Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize: “How can i top that?”).

  53. Catherine said on June 12th, 2009 at 1:08 am

    Actu­ally, those of you who find the cov­er­age of Sarah Palin sex­ist (and believe me, although I think she’s awful, the cov­er­age is worse), I think you might want to con­sider whether the cov­er­age of the Iran­ian candidate’s wife is a mite patron­iz­ing, too. “Never under­es­ti­mate the power of a woman?” I ask you. While it’s good to see a change afoot in Iran, the role of women in it is being depicted as quaint and, well, almost to Amer­i­can stan­dards — imag­ine that! How about we imag­ine an Amer­ica (first) and a world (soon there­after) in which you don’t have to be someone’s wife to be a national polit­i­cal fig­ure? Eliz­a­beth Edwards taught me, if you like the wife, VOTE FOR HER, not the hus­band.

    rant over, sorry for the caps lock voice.

  54. alex said on June 12th, 2009 at 7:26 am

    Cather­ine, I don’t see the cov­er­age of the Iran­ian candidate’s wife as patron­iz­ing. It’s an act of courage for her to be part of the cam­paign and she sym­bol­izes an unspo­ken (and at this time unspeak­able) promise to lib­er­ate women from the oppres­sion of the cur­rent regime.

    She is also of the gen­er­a­tion that came of age when the Shah was in power and Iran was a much more lib­eral, west­ern­ized coun­try where women could aspire to have careers and dress how­ever they please. I remem­ber meet­ing an Iran­ian cou­ple back in the ’80s who were try­ing des­per­ately to remain in the U.S. because their cher­ished way of life in Iran was no more and they couldn’t bear going back. They were edu­cated pro­fes­sion­als in an egal­i­tar­ian mar­riage. I don’t know what became of them but I hope they were granted cit­i­zen­ship.

    It is kind of cheap to attack Palin on her looks and to cast asper­sions about her daugh­ters being sluts, but it doesn’t bother me. Palin, after all, would never have come to the defense of Chelsea Clin­ton when Rush Lim­baugh was call­ing her an ugly dog that nobody would want to fuck. They used to take some pretty gra­tu­itous swipes at Chelsea on Fox. I remem­ber a Chelsea joke on a graphic lead­ing into a com­mer­cial break that said some­thing like “An African prince asks Bill Clin­ton for Chelsea’s hand in mar­riage. He offers three chick­ens and a goat. Bill Clin­ton accepts. Ques­tion: Is the prince get­ting screwed?”

    Palin, in all fair­ness, really is more beauty than brains. She serves her­self up in the kit­ten­ish way that true fem­i­nists loathe. And while I don’t think politi­cians’ chil­dren should be exploited, I also don’t think politi­cians should exploit “fam­ily val­ues” as cheaply and cyn­i­cally as she does. For this, I think she deserves to be tweaked for hav­ing a knocked up teen daugh­ter. Time will tell whether abstinence-only edu­ca­tion is work­ing for the younger one, and frankly I won’t be dis­ap­pointed if and when it doesn’t.

  55. nancy said on June 12th, 2009 at 7:39 am

    Leav­ing out the Iran­ian woman, I think Alex is absolutely right. I’d be more sym­pa­thetic to her if she kept her kid off the cover of Peo­ple mag­a­zine and off the morn­ing news shows, if she acted the way she claims she wants to be treated. I think the world would be happy to ignore Sarah Palin, given the chance. But she won’t give us one.

  56. JRG said on June 12th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Amen, Nancy. Although I admit Letterman’s jokes sort of rolled over me at first, I do see that they were prob­a­bly off base. But I find her intel­lec­tual vapid­ity and her appar­ent unaware­ness of it, cou­pled with the odd com­bi­na­tion of aggrieved vic­tim and self-righteousness that make up her per­sona, so revolt­ing that it’s hard for me to be dis­turbed by things peo­ple say about her and her fam­ily. I really do wish she would just go away.

  57. brian stouder said on June 12th, 2009 at 9:38 am

    For the record, last evening around 5:30 I called our local radio lip-flapper (and for­mer media part­ner of the pro­pri­etress, when she tested her wings on the air­waves of the Sum­mit City) and flatly stated (to him and his lis­ten­ing audi­ence) that the con­tention (which he was loudly and insis­tently pro­claim­ing) that the Obama admin­is­tra­tion had issued a new direc­tive to the mil­i­tary in Afghanistan – order­ing the “Miran­diz­ing” of cap­tured enemy com­bat­ants – was flatly false!

    This drew no argu­ment – and the host allowed me to con­tinue, so I pressed the other things we dis­cussed here – regard­ing the civic respon­si­bil­i­ties that comes with broad­cast­ing on the pub­lic air­waves, and THAT pro­voked a response from the host.

    But the point is – he did allow me an inning, and he did not have any answer for the main con­tention (the fal­sity of the ‘Obama the deluded civil-libertarian-for-enemies-of-the United States’).

    Any­way, it was refresh­ing to think that at least a few peo­ple might have heard the host’s point rebutted, and noted that the host had no fur­ther argu­ment. Really, I can­not help but like our local guy; he will allow oppos­ing views (very unlike his national coun­ter­parts), as long as one is polite about it.

    Can’t ask for any­thing more

  58. LAMary said on June 12th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    We mock appear­ances of male can­di­dates. John Edwards hair, Mitt Rom­ney look­ing like Guy Smi­ley, Den­nis Kucinich look­ing like an elf. Say­ing Sarah Palin looks like a slutty flight atten­dant. She chooses to look that way and spends a lot of money achiev­ing that look.

  59. Cathy (the Ft. Wayne one) said on June 12th, 2009 at 9:55 pm