nancynall.com » My so-called life.

My so-called life.

ebonyivory
Ebony and ivoreeee live together in per­fect har-mo-neeeee side by side on my formica kitchen table, oh lord, why don’t weeeeee?

For the record, I thought the grilled-cheese sand­wich thread was hilar­i­ous. Tacos. Ha. Oth­er­wise I didn’t keep up with much news yes­ter­day. My day was full to the brim with activ­ity and hostess­ing, so I didn’t really learn about the Holo­caust Museum shoot­ing until this morn­ing, not to men­tion the David Let­ter­man ker­fuf­fle among the right­blog­gers, and you know what? There’s noth­ing like a day away from the news to let you know what’s impor­tant. Of course, any day that begins with a trip to one of the auto­mo­tives is always well-spent, espe­cially when they take you dri­ving on one of their prov­ing grounds. You learn the most amus­ing things, like the names of cer­tain stretches of test pave­ment — “sine wave,” for instance, and “pitch and jounce.”

But the best thing was the entrance and exit ramps, which were banked. Seri­ously banked. Noth­ing like fly­ing through a banked turn to make you say wheeee.

Then it was lunch in Mex­i­can­town and a stop at the Hon­ey­bee Mar­ket for man­gos, and home to make agua fresca and wait for John and Sam. The New York Times fea­tured agua fresca in its Recipes for Health col­umn a few days back, Laura Lipp­man Face­booked it and cred­ited it with all sort of miracle-working pow­ers, so I thought, OK, I’ll bite. I even made two pitch­ers — one mango, one water­melon. And both were fab­u­lous, but the mango went dry first. I’m old enough to have rel­a­tives who think a mango is a green pep­per, and here they are, years later, read­ily avail­able in any old Kroger. I think, how long did Latin Amer­ica keep these fruits to them­selves, and can we bring action for this in some sort of inter­na­tional court?

I also think: You know what would go well with this? A shot of vodka.

Tip: Make it with the smaller, yel­low man­goes. They’re sweeter. Although I’m sure the big red ones would work splen­didly, too. You really can’t go wrong with mangoes.

Agua fresca was only one thing on the menu, how­ever. The other bev­er­age was wine, which may explain why I for­got to make a salad. Also, one of my stu­dents stopped by — long story, not inter­est­ing — and when he left, his clutch failed, so there was 10 min­utes spend bleed­ing the air out of some­thing under the hood, and long story short, din­ner was sort of a blur. But a fun blur! Who cares when your friends are in your kitchen?

Oh, and for all you Detroit haters? The car with the bum clutch was a Honda.

After din­ner we ate ice cream and watched the first two episodes of “Nurse Jackie.” Edie Falco is great, isn’t she? They really worked to wash the Carmela off of her — that frosted-tips hair­cut is just inspired — although her scrub tops looks suspiciously…fitted. But she tran­scends the cos­tume, I’d say. Our one-year arrange­ment with Com­cast expires in August, at which time I fig­ured I’d boot Show­time and Starz, the two pre­mium chan­nels they threw in gratis when we switched our phone ser­vice. Not being a fan of either “Dex­ter” or “Weeds,” I thought this would be easy to do. Now? Damn.

So what hap­pened in your neck of the woods yesterday?

If you didn’t see Connie’s husband’s heron pic­tures, you are miss­ing a treat. Big file, long down­load even in broad­band, absolutely worth the wait.

Look, the museum shooter thinks the pres­i­dent isn’t a natural-born cit­i­zen. How shocked I am to learn this.

And now I am off. But I’ll be back.

59 responses to
“My so-called life.”

  1. Connie said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    Thanks for the link Nancy. To me the most amaz­ing thing is that the heron pics were shot in the cen­ter of the city, just two blocks from my office. Guess it helps to have two rivers downtown.

    I live with a 59 yr old guy who has a 13 yr old boy brain in many ways, and, well I just knew I didn’t need to read the grilled cheese thing.

  2. Deborah said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:17 am

    I love man­gos. I grew up in Miami, FL so nat­u­rally we had a tree in our back­yard, every­one did. It seems like mango sea­son lasted all year, but I was a kid so every­thing seemed bound­less. all our neigh­bors were try­ing to get rid of man­gos, tak­ing large paper bags of them to work but nobody wanted them because they all had their own to get rid of. My fam­ily moved to FL from Iowa so we thought man­gos were very exotic. I remem­ber my mother brag­ging to her sis­ter that Jackie Kennedy said the pres liked to have man­gos with his break­fast occa­sion­ally and here we had them everday.

  3. Dorothy said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:41 am

    How the heck did you get to see two episodes of Nurse Jackie? I thought only one was out so far? I’m jealous.

    Didja see the pos­i­tively creepy mugshot of Phil Spec­tor? No won­der he wears those ugly wigs: http://​blogs​.usato​day​.com/​.​a​/​6​a​0​0​d​8​3​4​5​1​b​4​6​2​6​9​e​2​0​1​1​5​7​0​e​f​a​6​5​1​9​70b-pi

  4. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    My mom used to always drink Fresca.

  5. beb said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:03 am

    Cal­gon, I mean, Nancy, take me away.… I just dis­cov­ered that, accord­ing to my insur­ance com­pany, I was born on the wrong day. I’m feel­ing a lit­tle dis­ap­ated right now. Do I even exist. Was Franz Kafka chan­nel­ing my life?

    Let­ter­man should have known that it’s not right to make jokes of the chil­dren of politi­cians. But then, too, he was obvi­ously jok­ing about the knocked up one, not her younger sis­ter. As for “slutty air­line atten­dent make-up” f it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it can’t com­plain if son­me­one makes a duck joke at their expense.

  6. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:04 am

    I enjoy David Let­ter­man a great deal and have always pre­ferred his more acidic approach to things over Jay Leno’s nice guy per­sona, but I’m dis­ap­pointed he went for such an easy cheap shot on Sarah Palin in his Top Ten list.

    Now that she’s a pub­lic fig­ure, she is fair game, and there is plenty about this intel­lec­tual and polit­i­cal light­weight to mock. Her sense of enti­tle­ment, her tor­tured logic, her inabil­ity to speak in com­plete sen­tences, her shock­ingly shal­low world view, etc.

    The good gov­er­nor is a walk­ing “tar­get rich envi­ron­ment,” as old Rummy would say. Focus­ing on her looks is truly the lazy writer’s way out.

  7. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    In the morn­ing, I lis­ten to WOWO for traf­fic and news and Char­lie Butcher — who bugged me 30 years ago when I was rid­ing to high school, but who has since grown on me. By way of say­ing, when I roll off to lunch at about 12:30 each day, the radio starts right up on WOWO, and I hear Uncle Rush ful­mi­nat­ing about what­ever the hell. Often, I let him have his say until he makes me cuss, and THEN I switch away. As Keith Olber­mann pointed out yes­ter­day, I can attest that at just about the same moment a secu­rity guard at a museum(!!) was being mur­dered by a hate-filled man who thinks the pres­i­dent isn’t a natural-born cit­i­zen, Uncle Rush was mak­ing the exact same “point”.

    So we have free-floating anti-semitism (per­son­i­fied by the remorse­less shooter), con­spir­a­to­r­ial stage whis­pers and lunatic rav­ings from radio lip-flappers, and oh-by-the-way old fash­ioned racist impulses (the shooter aimed his open­ing shots at the armed black man). I agree that the left­wing fever swamps are sore losers when ‘their side’ loses; hell, a num­ber of the fever-swampers on the left aren’t happy with Pres­i­dent Obama’s WIN! But what makes the rightwing fever-swampers so damned vio­lent? Good Christ! You lost! Get over it!! Here’s a thought — maybe even work on doing bet­ter next time!! I think we, here, can all agree that the panic gun-buying/ammo stock-piling, end-of-days think­ing, spu­ri­ous super­sti­tions sup­ple­ment­ing schtick that Fox News and broad­cast radio cvhurns out every­day is, at best, unhealthy. After­all, the left wing fever swamps — the ones that are as stri­dent as Rush and Sean and Glen — are in internet-land, and not on MSNBC or broad­cast radio.

    Or, maybe we can­not agree about that.

  8. Connie said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    Was your prov­ing ground trip to Mil­ford? My brother-in-law is a third shift test dri­ver there, and tells great sto­ries. My fave had to do with run­ning a Corvette on the cob­ble­stone road track. Also sto­ries about the 17 employee deaths on the site over the years. He also says he’s not offi­cially a dri­ver, he is some­thing like an engineer’s test­ing assistant.

  9. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    Brian,

    From your lip’s to God’s ear. We only hear about the main­stream loud­mouths with the big con­tracts: Lim­baugh, Han­nity, Beck, O’Reilly, et​.al. You’re quite right that there is a sub-group that is fur­ther under­ground, oper­at­ing on the Inter­net and short­wave radio. One of these creeps, Hal Turner, is not that far afield from the shooter at the Holo­caust Museum and he has turned up more than once on Hannity’s program.

    The bas­tard who killed a secu­rity guard in D.C. yes­ter­day was a long-time Holo­caust denier and white suprema­cist, but also a mem­ber of the so-called “birther ele­ment,” which believes Pres­i­dent Obama is not eli­gi­ble for office because he actu­ally was born in Kenya. He is as far right as you can get. So, nat­u­rally, last night Glenn Beck assured his audi­ence that this guy was a “lone nut­case.” Beck also insisted his daily dose of rhetor­i­cal gaso­line could not pos­si­bly influ­ence creeps like the Nazi wor­ship­per who pulled the trig­ger in D.C. Beck is pre­dict­ing more of this kind of vio­lence because “the pot is boil­ing” in Amer­ica while refus­ing to acknowl­edge he helps sup­ply the heat.

    The Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity direc­tive warn­ing of out­breaks of far rightwing vio­lence looks incred­bly prescient.

  10. LAMary said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    NPR had a story about Indian man­gos this morn­ing which has inspired me to seek out a mango tree to plant in my yard. Here you can buy man­gos at the end of free­way ramps. My local mango guy gets six to ten bucks a box for man­gos or papayas, depend­ing on how much he wants to get off the free­way ramp. He’s got straw­ber­ries and those per­fect look­ing half sized bananas right now too.

  11. Catherine said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Aguas fres­cas are God’s gift. Try cucum­ber: http://​tinyurl​.com/​mas78n

    Hor­chata, too, but not as healthy.

  12. nancy said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    If you have on-demand cable, the upcom­ing episode is avail­able a week early. They some­times do this with buzz-y shows like “The Wire.”

  13. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Ok, let’s get this over with, because you know it’s going to be part of the non-mango discussion/argument even­tu­ally: Rev. Jere­miah Wright is blam­ing “Them Jews” for keep­ing him away from Obama.
    http://​www​.chicagotri​bune​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​n​a​t​i​o​n​w​o​r​l​d​/​c​h​i​-​w​r​i​g​h​t​_​1​1​j​u​n​1​1​,​0​,​5​5​3​2​8​7​9​.story

  14. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Ok, let’s get this over with

    Well, Jere­miah Wright is an idiot. Done!

    (and if Jere­miah Wright’s views must be ascribed to Pres­i­dent Obama, and ippso-facto Obama is an anti-Semite and there­fore attached to the museum shooter -

    then indeed all who go to churchs that are anti-abortion are sim­i­larly attached to the domes­tic ter­ror­ist shoot­ers of doc­tors and bombers of clinics!)

  15. Joe Kobiela said on June 11th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    Jeff and Brian,
    Why no out­rage from the media about the sol­dier mur­dered last week? He was gunned down by a jerk that has been quoted as say­ing it was jus­ti­fied, because we are killing women and chil­dren in Mus­lim nations. Why does it seem so one sided in the media?
    Pilot Joe

  16. LAMary said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    I don’t know what media you’re read­ing, Joe, but I’ve seen only con­dem­na­tion of his actions.

  17. James said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    Joe:

    If you mean, why no cov­er­age, then you haven’t been read­ing the right papers. Why no out­rage? I don’t want the media feed­ing me out­rage… just news.

    Can you give us an exam­ple of what you’re talk­ing about?

  18. Joe Kobiela said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I guess to me it seems that when some­thing hap­pens to some­one like Dr Tiller or this deal with the guy in D.C. peo­ple are quick to point out that the killers were right wing lean­ing. Then Rush and Beck are brought up along with O’Rielly, like some how it’s their fault, but no one in the media attempts to make a con­nec­tion between this killer and the left.
    I just wish the cov­er­age was not so bias, accord­ing to the fac­tor last night, the Tiller killing gen­er­ated a 10 – 1 story count over the sol­diers mur­der.
    Pilot Joe

  19. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Joe, it’s pos­si­ble that some of the 10 – 1 story count is because Tiller’s mur­derer has, against his attorney’s advice, spo­ken repeat­edly to the press. The man who killed the sol­dier appears, at the moment any­way, to be hon­or­ing a gag order that was issued at the request of the pros­e­cu­tor who stated that he wanted to pro­tect the man’s right to a fair trial.
    http://​www​.google​.com/​h​o​s​t​e​d​n​e​w​s​/​a​p​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​A​L​e​q​M​5​g​Q​A​C​N​s​h​V​F​Y​t​6​M​9​C​D​y​k​H​q​6​D​K​q​P​h​i​w​D​9​8​NIFVO0

  20. Scout said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Good ques­tion Pilot Joe. Why is it, indeed? Why is it that peo­ple like O’Reilly, Beck, Lim­baugh, Han­nity, Scar­bor­ough, et al con­tinue to dom­i­nate the national soap­box to spew their dog whis­tled calls for vio­lence? Why ARE things so one-sided?

    And address­ing your other ques­tion — who in the so-called one sided media expressed an opin­ion that led to incit­ing the mil­i­tary shooter to vio­lence? Who specifically?

    There is a dif­fer­ence between fac­tual report­ing and a drum­beat of right wing idiocy that con­stantly pounds out stuff like the rhetoric that Obama is not a cit­i­zen, Obama is going to take your guns, Obama is a social­ist, and on and on.

    All these recent vio­lent deaths are tragic, but what makes the PA cop mur­ders, the Tiller mur­der and the Holo­caust Museum mur­der even more so is that the shoot­ers were dri­ven by rage talk that seems to esca­late daily from the mouths of right wing pun­dits with national megaphones.

  21. basset said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Did they men­tion “tum­ble­home,” Nance? for some rea­son that term sticks with me.

    and I sus­pect “slutty flight atten­dant” will too.

  22. James said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Joe:

    There’s no evi­dence that the killer of the sol­dier was left-leaning. Where’d you get that from? A rad­i­cal­ized Mus­lim man might be described many ways, but left-leaning is not one of them.

  23. LAMary said on June 11th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    I think Ms Palin DOES look like a slutty flight atten­dant. It’s that “bronzer under the cheek­bones” look paired with her hairdo.

  24. Dorothy said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    I com­pletely for­got about the on-demand cable thing. We had that when we lived in South Carolina.

  25. coozledad said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Appar­ently a num­ber of wingers, in another dis­play of infan­til­ism and pro­jec­tion, have tried to paint Von Brunn as a lefty. Here’s the refu­ta­tion, in case any of the ass­wipes have pulled their hands from over their ears:
    http://​www​.talk​ing​pointsmemo​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​n​o​t​e​_​f​o​u​n​d​_​i​n​_​v​o​n​_​b​r​u​n​n​s​_​c​ar.php
    So now Obama’s a mem­ber of the inter­na­tional Jew­ish con­spir­acy, as well as a Mus­lim Com­muno­fas­cist Illu­mi­nati scary black dude baby killer.
    I don’t know how he finds the time.

  26. ROgirl said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    He may have been a “lone nut­case,” but con­sider these recent events: the guy who killed the Wes­leyan stu­dent in May wrote about a killing spree tar­get­ing Jews, and the foiled plot to blow up the syn­a­gogues in the Bronx.

    When Obama came into office the haters and cra­zies took it as a sign to ramp up the para­noia and act on it, egged on by the foam­ing fear-mongering of the right-wing media entertainers.

    I have to say, I won­der what ever drew Obama to Jere­miah Wright.

  27. JRG said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I’ve just been card-shopping on Etsy and came across one that one of you lovers of the Great Lakes might like.

  28. JRG said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    Joe, that soldier’s death was as much of a loss and as much of a tragedy as the other hor­ri­ble inci­dents we’ve expe­ri­enced recently, but there are lots of rea­sons it hasn’t got­ten the same play in the press. Unlike Tiller, the vic­tim wasn’t a high-profile fig­ure asso­ci­ated with a hot-button polit­i­cal issue. Unlike yesterday’s shoot­ing, the site of the Arkansas shoot­ing is not a shrine ded­i­cated to teach­ing about and try­ing to pre­vent the kind of hatred reflected in the shoot­ing, much less a shrine located in one of the nation’s media capitals.

    And then, as James says, rad­i­cal jihadism is not a key plank in the plat­form of the polit­i­cal left.

  29. JRG said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    As usual, LAMary, you’ve put your fin­ger on exactly the right details – def­i­nitely the bronzer, but espe­cially the hairdo.

  30. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    and not for noth­ing, but our ‘main­stream media’ DOES ascribe rad­i­cal atti­tudes to mideast media (al Jazeera, et al) and loud­mouthed (and loathe­some) devil-may-care pro­nounce­ments from unaccountable-to-anyone-else Mullahs.

    Our rad­i­cal­ized jihadists have their media, and our dis-satisfied fel­low coun­try­men have theirs, too.

    edit– the old joke about slutty flight atten­dants was the one liner: “Cof­fee, milk, or TWA tea?”

  31. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    JRG: that post­card looks like it has a fancy ver­sion of the SS Bad­ger on it. Thanks.
    Brian: Edit — that was yesterday’s topic. I think.

  32. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    Putting the lie to the lat­est rightwing canard( if you haven’t heard it yet, you will):

    http://​firstread​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​1​9​6​1​4​2​2.aspx

    an excerpt:

    An arti­cle in the Weekly Stan­dard says the Obama admin­is­tra­tion has ordered a change in pol­icy, requir­ing agents to give Miranda warn­ings to all detainees. In fact, agents have from time to time given Miranda warn­ings to some detainees who, it’s thought, might end up being pros­e­cuted in U.S. courts. This began in the last administration.

    The infec­tious rumi­na­tions of right­ward Swine con­tinue their unabated spread (our local radio lip-flapper is in high dud­geon over this, and has spent the past half hour whip­ping peo­ple up)

  33. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    Joe,

    I believe your points already have been refuted, but it bears repeat­ing: There is noth­ing on the left side of the radio or tele­vi­sion dial that even comes close to the kinds of rhetoric reg­u­larly thrown around by the blovi­a­tors of the right.

    If Rachel Mad­dow or Keith Olber­man or Ed Schultz or Stephanie Miller were reg­u­larly refer­ring to our armed forces as ene­mies and urg­ing their lis­ten­ers and view­ers onward with vicious, elim­i­na­tion­ist rhetoric, you’d have a point. But they don’t and you don’t.

    It’s not like this is any­thing new, Joe. I believe it was dur­ing the Clin­ton Admin­is­tra­tion years that G. Gor­don Liddy –now there’s a great Amer­i­can hero if ever there were one– advised his lis­ten­ers that if any fed­eral agents ever came call­ing, to aim for the head because they all wore bullet-proof vests.

  34. Joe Kobiela said on June 11th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    I have never heard O’Riely Rush Han­nity or Beck, Tell any­one to use vio­lence
    If you have show me where.
    Pilot Joe

  35. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

  36. Sue said on June 11th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    No Brian, what Joe is look­ing for is one of these folks say­ing “I want you to go out there and kill [fill in the blank]”. Which you will not hear. Should any of them say that, they would not have any cover when some­thing hap­pens. Although I did like the part about Abra­ham Lin­coln dis­lik­ing Tim­o­thy Gei­th­ner.
    Joe, be fair. When O’Reilly says “And if the state of Kansas doesn’t stop this man, then any­body who pre­vents that from hap­pen­ing has blood on their hands as the gov­er­nor does right now, Gov­er­nor Sebe­lius” and “Kansas is a great state, but this is a dis­grace upon every­one who lives in Kansas”, do you not think that he might, just might, be engag­ing in behav­ior designed to incite hatred and vio­lence? And doing it in front of a large fan base?

  37. Hexdecimal said on June 11th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Brian – I too have to call you on this one. It has noth­ing to do with Joes request. The Rush piece only men­tions killing in the title — “Obama Wants to Chan­nel Your Anger Toward Killing Cap­i­tal­ism”. The rest of the piece is a rant, for sure, but no where is it even close to what one would con­sider hate speech.

    Actu­ally, the piece was funny in sev­eral places. When he ref­er­ences the teleprompter as the one telling Obama [the speech] he harkens back to when folks were say­ing it was Dick Cheney who was the pup­pet mas­ter (with his arm stuffed up Bush’s ass). I believe Obama comes out the win­ner because at least the teleprompter can sting together two or more coher­ent sen­tences with the cor­rect enunciation.

  38. Dexter said on June 11th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Cable TV…Since Time Warner took Sun­dance away from me , then (after FORTY phone calls!) said I could get it back, but it would cost me another ten bucks a month, I thought I had bet­ter not go ahead and order Shotime, like I wanted to.
    It makes me laugh to see these ads for DishTV —” $9.99 for three months!” is the lat­est, when I have to pay more than that for ONE extra pre­mium chan­nel.
    I dumped DirecTV after 11 years when I found out I could have been get­ting local chan­nels for years, but my receiver was obso­lete, but nobody ever told me, no emails, no mailings…and I was pay­ing the local cable provider almost $700 a year all that time for pro­gram­ming I should have been receiv­ing from my satel­lite dish. The cable com­pany made me get a full pack­age of chan­nels if I wanted broad­band. I was pay­ing for the same sta­tions on both DirecTV and cable. Then I was lied to by DirecTV for the last time when they told me local chan­nels were not avail­able in my area…when they in fact were, indeed.
    Did I tell yas about my “free insta­la­tion”? $450 it cost me cuz I had three TVs. Now they adver­tise 4 rooms for free. Do not believe them.

  39. moe99 said on June 11th, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    http://​www​.salon​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​5​/​3​1​/​t​iller/

    Bill O’Reilly on Tiller is the same effect as using a dog whis­tle on a dog. All the right words are there to incite some­one, any­one to kill him. Just not said directly so O’Reilly can dis­claim respon­si­bil­ity. Very clev­erly done. May he rot in hell.

  40. jeff borden said on June 11th, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Since we began with riffs on the brain­less and irri­tat­ing Gov. Palin, let’s not for­get that this overly ambi­tious polit­i­cal hack spent much of the final months of last fall’s cam­paign claim­ing that Pres­i­dent Obama “paled (or palled??) around with ter­ror­ists” and that the only “real Amer­i­cans” could be found in small towns. Her cam­paign rhetoric was so extreme, even McCain had to work to damp it down.

  41. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 7:53 pm

    Dex­ter — we spent 10 or 11 years with Dish, after dump­ing Com­cast cable in the wake of one of their end­less rate increases.

    We were happy with Dish — but our equip­ment had worn out, too. We had found Dish remotes on E-Bay, but the receivers were giv­ing up the ghost, plus we noticed (as you did) that the newer deals were much more capa­ble, and for a bit less than we were paying.

    We called them to asked for new equip­ment, and they tried to tell us how much it would cost.…and to make a long story short, we fired them.

    And THEN — then and only then — they SUDDENLY were will­ing to make concessions!

    To make a long story short, THAT’S when we learned that the very first card you play with these folks is — can­cel the ser­vice. Then, the pow­er­less tele­phone per­son hands you off to a super­vi­sor, and things begin to happen.

    We’ve been with DirecTV for sev­eral years, and we noted they were offer­ing a very nice deal (DVR/low rates, etc) for new cus­tomers, so we con­tacted them and informed them that we were tem­i­nat­ing the ser­vice unless we got the new stuff, too — and voila!

  42. coozledad said on June 11th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

  43. joodyb said on June 11th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    Brian, the ‘new cus­tomer’ pol­icy is squishy in all mar­kets. fact is, they have to offer you the same price, but most cus­tomers never call them on it. we had the same issue with Com­cast (nee Time­Warner). I had a grand­fa­thered rate for cable/broadband bun­dle. when Com­cast came to town, they tried to tell me i couldn’t have it any­more. i said “fine, turn it off. at my age, i’ve paid tens of thou­sands for cable ser­vice. you should be ashamed of your­selves.” I got a let­ter the next week, all sta­tus quo.
    any­one can cut a deal. most peo­ple just don’t know to do it.

  44. Dexter said on June 11th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    yeah brian st. — we get DirecTV mail­ings twice a week beg­ging us to come back.
    I mean, after all, I paid them $98 a month for 11 and a half years, I bought my own equip­ment back then, (before they stopped that) and I enjoyed trouble-free ser­vice for years. You’ve seen the ads for cable that brag they never lose sig­nal “like satel­lite does”? Well, Time Warner is always going off line! Almost every week we have outages…just today, CNN was off all morn­ing, along with about 20 other channels…complain? Why? “…no dis­counts off your bill unless we are off 24 hours straight.“
    There’s just no easy way at all.
    brian? How about a Fort Wayne Tin Caps update…like the sta­dium? park­ing rea­son­able? Dol­lar hot dogs and peanuts?

  45. alex said on June 11th, 2009 at 9:44 pm

    Pilot Joe isn’t worth argu­ing with. I started a long, well-reasoned post ear­lier today and after almost fin­ish­ing it I just deleted the whole damned thing because it’s lost on him anyway.

    Just like the fol­low­ing is surely lost on devout right-wingers. But it’s bring­ing tears to my eyes.

    http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​z​a​h​r​a​-​r​a​h​n​a​v​a​r​d​-​i​r​a​n​i​a​n​s​_​n​_​2​1​4​5​5​4.html

    EDIT: And it’s “writ­ten in the sky.” Kind of like our recent election:

    http://​www​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​o​p​i​n​i​o​n​/​1​1​i​h​t​-​e​d​c​o​h​e​n​.​h​t​m​l?_r=1

    Ain’t just the Amer­i­can mul­lahs run­ning scared these days.

  46. Kevin Knuth said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

  47. basset said on June 11th, 2009 at 10:58 pm

    I started to get Bell­South DSL back when I upgraded from dialup… only live about a half-mile from the switch so I fig­ured it’d be no prob­lem, they had a free-hookup spe­cial so I called.

    Turns out it was free if you had a PC, $100 for a Mac. Told them we’d do it our­selves, we know how, really… no, still $100. Went to Com­cast, not out­stand­ing ser­vice but it works most of the time.

  48. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Mar­velous story, Alex, as is the link i found in the side­bar — http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​a​m​y​-​s​i​s​k​i​n​d​/​s​e​x​i​s​m​-​a​g​a​i​n​s​t​-​c​o​n​s​e​r​v​a​t​i​_​b​_​2​1​4​2​4​8.html

    The descrip­tive rhetoric used for Sarah Palin, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clin­ton, and yes, even Ann Coul­ter (“her bony clavicle” — i mean, c’mon, who else always gets this kind of detailed mock­ing phys­i­cal descrip­tion in polit­i­cal cov­er­age?) is just ridicu­lous. Mock­ing Rush’s girth is fair because he is a kind of sideshow clown and so it comes with the ter­rain, but Palin’s detrac­tors would have pro­voked Mar­garet Mead to leap to her defense. Appar­ently women have to be safely, markedly post-menopausal to avoid the hyper-sexualized mock­ery that is so nor­mal­ized in polit­i­cal chatter.

    Roger Ebert’s blog­ging has been a real gift to me in recent months, but his thrice affirmed links to a buddy who has painted a puerile nude of Alaska’s gov­er­nor: what in heaven’s name is that about? What’s it got to do with any­thing, other than “non-aged pow­er­ful woman we don’t agree with — quick, take her clothes off in pub­lic to put her in her place!”

    I just don’t get the left’s fas­ci­na­tion with get­ting Palin’s clothes off, or their obses­sion with the fact that she doesn’t look like Phyl­lis Schlafly. She looks like eight of the last ten women i talked to today, the two excep­tions being heav­ily tat­tooed and some­what under­dressed even for a June day. None of whom i’d call a slutty flight atten­dant, and none of whom i’d dare make jokes about the avail­abil­ity of their 14 year old daugh­ters … and that’s who was with her at Yan­kee Sta­dium, as the NYTimes had clearly noted that day, so if Dave’s joke was about the daugh­ter who was at the ball park, then he just can’t say “well, well, hey, i meant the one that’s slutty, any­one can tell that’s what i would have meant if i’d been think­ing about it.”

    Yeah, i *really* like Dave telling us who he can and can’t joke about “get­ting knocked up with a ballplayer.” Palin over-reacted? That’s not what any mom with a 14 year old daugh­ter would say that i know.

    Can’t y’all go back to mak­ing fun of pilonoidal cysts and Mark Levin’s voice? It would be mildly infan­tile, but fair enough; this glee­ful cheap shot­ting of the Palins is really mak­ing some of you sound merely silly as you try to call foul balls as “in bounds.” Now, mock­ing Goe­glein — well in bounds. Take your base.

  49. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    By the way, Jon Stew­art has been strik­ingly fair and rea­son­able as he tees off on Sarah Palin, so it clearly isn’t “can’t talk about her if you can’t mock her looks.”

    The most fair and bal­anced broad­caster on TV!

  50. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    Dex­ter — I con­fess I haven’t ven­tured into Parkview Field yet. The kids and I drove past when a game was going, and could feel the electricity.

    Any­way, if we don’t get in there sooner, Pam and I will be a com­pany event there July 15 (extra good seats, plus food and good­ies), and I’ll give you a full report!

    KK’s Goe­glein alert was pretty funny to read; thanks!

    And ALex — those Iran pieces are good stuff. I’ve been tak­ing in the hope­ful pic­tures and such from there — of throngs in the streets…and I’m work­ing not to get my hopes up. But indeed, and with all due cau­tion and so on — I think it wouldn’t be too much to say that if the Iran­ian elec­torate responds — in the com­ing hours — to what the Amer­i­can elec­torate did last Novem­ber (and dumps Nutjob), I’m going to have some seri­ous pollyanna reac­tions about how folks are folks the world over, etc etc.

  51. brian stouder said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    Jeff tmmo — let me leap to say that I am in com­plete agree­ment with you about Letterman/Palin.

    Letterman’s style of humor has really never appealed to me, and his bash­ing of Palin’s daugh­ter was meanly stupid.

    And — I think the Palin family’s response has been more com­posed and rea­son­able than the Stouder family’s would have been, if the lanky come­dian (who lives in a moral glass house, too) had slimed our daugh­ters. Just sayin’

  52. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 11th, 2009 at 11:24 pm

    Stew­art is jok­ing with Katie Couric about some­thing that our local net­work news is, in fact, doing — “news bingo, then they can win stuff!” NBC4 is doing key words in the news­casts (i call them, gen­er­ously), and when you have enough key words on your reg­is­tered pro­file, you can “win stuff.”

    Sorry, Jon, as Tom Lehrer said, it gets harder and harder to do satire (Lehrer said, with­out a smile, that he quit the satire biz when Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize: “How can i top that?”).

  53. Catherine said on June 12th, 2009 at 1:08 am

    Actu­ally, those of you who find the cov­er­age of Sarah Palin sex­ist (and believe me, although I think she’s awful, the cov­er­age is worse), I think you might want to con­sider whether the cov­er­age of the Iran­ian candidate’s wife is a mite patron­iz­ing, too. “Never under­es­ti­mate the power of a woman?” I ask you. While it’s good to see a change afoot in Iran, the role of women in it is being depicted as quaint and, well, almost to Amer­i­can stan­dards — imag­ine that! How about we imag­ine an Amer­ica (first) and a world (soon there­after) in which you don’t have to be someone’s wife to be a national polit­i­cal fig­ure? Eliz­a­beth Edwards taught me, if you like the wife, VOTE FOR HER, not the husband.

    rant over, sorry for the caps lock voice.

  54. alex said on June 12th, 2009 at 7:26 am

    Cather­ine, I don’t see the cov­er­age of the Iran­ian candidate’s wife as patron­iz­ing. It’s an act of courage for her to be part of the cam­paign and she sym­bol­izes an unspo­ken (and at this time unspeak­able) promise to lib­er­ate women from the oppres­sion of the cur­rent regime.

    She is also of the gen­er­a­tion that came of age when the Shah was in power and Iran was a much more lib­eral, west­ern­ized coun­try where women could aspire to have careers and dress how­ever they please. I remem­ber meet­ing an Iran­ian cou­ple back in the ‘80s who were try­ing des­per­ately to remain in the U.S. because their cher­ished way of life in Iran was no more and they couldn’t bear going back. They were edu­cated pro­fes­sion­als in an egal­i­tar­ian mar­riage. I don’t know what became of them but I hope they were granted citizenship.

    It is kind of cheap to attack Palin on her looks and to cast asper­sions about her daugh­ters being sluts, but it doesn’t bother me. Palin, after all, would never have come to the defense of Chelsea Clin­ton when Rush Lim­baugh was call­ing her an ugly dog that nobody would want to fuck. They used to take some pretty gra­tu­itous swipes at Chelsea on Fox. I remem­ber a Chelsea joke on a graphic lead­ing into a com­mer­cial break that said some­thing like “An African prince asks Bill Clin­ton for Chelsea’s hand in mar­riage. He offers three chick­ens and a goat. Bill Clin­ton accepts. Ques­tion: Is the prince get­ting screwed?”

    Palin, in all fair­ness, really is more beauty than brains. She serves her­self up in the kit­ten­ish way that true fem­i­nists loathe. And while I don’t think politi­cians’ chil­dren should be exploited, I also don’t think politi­cians should exploit “fam­ily val­ues” as cheaply and cyn­i­cally as she does. For this, I think she deserves to be tweaked for hav­ing a knocked up teen daugh­ter. Time will tell whether abstinence-only edu­ca­tion is work­ing for the younger one, and frankly I won’t be dis­ap­pointed if and when it doesn’t.

  55. nancy said on June 12th, 2009 at 7:39 am

    Leav­ing out the Iran­ian woman, I think Alex is absolutely right. I’d be more sym­pa­thetic to her if she kept her kid off the cover of Peo­ple mag­a­zine and off the morn­ing news shows, if she acted the way she claims she wants to be treated. I think the world would be happy to ignore Sarah Palin, given the chance. But she won’t give us one.

  56. JRG said on June 12th, 2009 at 8:26 am

    Amen, Nancy. Although I admit Letterman’s jokes sort of rolled over me at first, I do see that they were prob­a­bly off base. But I find her intel­lec­tual vapid­ity and her appar­ent unaware­ness of it, cou­pled with the odd com­bi­na­tion of aggrieved vic­tim and self-righteousness that make up her per­sona, so revolt­ing that it’s hard for me to be dis­turbed by things peo­ple say about her and her fam­ily. I really do wish she would just go away.

  57. brian stouder said on June 12th, 2009 at 9:38 am

    For the record, last evening around 5:30 I called our local radio lip-flapper (and for­mer media part­ner of the pro­pri­etress, when she tested her wings on the air­waves of the Sum­mit City) and flatly stated (to him and his lis­ten­ing audi­ence) that the con­tention (which he was loudly and insis­tently pro­claim­ing) that the Obama admin­is­tra­tion had issued a new direc­tive to the mil­i­tary in Afghanistan — order­ing the “Miran­diz­ing” of cap­tured enemy com­bat­ants — was flatly false!

    This drew no argu­ment — and the host allowed me to con­tinue, so I pressed the other things we dis­cussed here — regard­ing the civic respon­si­bil­i­ties that comes with broad­cast­ing on the pub­lic air­waves, and THAT pro­voked a response from the host.

    But the point is — he did allow me an inning, and he did not have any answer for the main con­tention (the fal­sity of the ‘Obama the deluded civil-libertarian-for-enemies-of-the United States’).

    Any­way, it was refresh­ing to think that at least a few peo­ple might have heard the host’s point rebutted, and noted that the host had no fur­ther argu­ment. Really, I can­not help but like our local guy; he will allow oppos­ing views (very unlike his national coun­ter­parts), as long as one is polite about it.

    Can’t ask for any­thing more

  58. LAMary said on June 12th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    We mock appear­ances of male can­di­dates. John Edwards hair, Mitt Rom­ney look­ing like Guy Smi­ley, Den­nis Kucinich look­ing like an elf. Say­ing Sarah Palin looks like a slutty flight atten­dant. She chooses to look that way and spends a lot of money achiev­ing that look.

  59. Cathy (the Ft. Wayne one) said on June 12th, 2009 at 9:55 pm