nancynall.com » Speedblogging.

Speedblogging.

Twenty min­utes! That’s all the time I have before I have to hit the ground run­ning, and I really should wash my face and put on a bra first, so make that…15 min­utes! Let’s bunt this post with a cleanout of my iPhone pho­tos, stu­pid picture-notebook stuff I’ve been car­ry­ing around think­ing this might make a blog item, but prob­a­bly won’t. (And usu­ally doesn’t.) But maybe when we com­bine them, we can get a much big­ger lame-ass blog. Let’s find out. First, a Prous­t­ian memory-prod:

paint

Pyra­mids of this stuff were stacked in the win­dow of my local paint store, which I don’t visit often, but it’s next door to the bak­ery, which I do. It went up around the end of the school year, and even though this area doesn’t do much in the way of stu­dent rentals, there’s some­thing about this no-nonsense prod­uct — “Detroit’s Orig­i­nal”? Really? — that con­jures up mem­o­ries of end-of-term mov­ing day, of pack­ing the boxes and suit­cases and car­ry­ing them to the truck. The stuff you thought was so impor­tant in Sep­tem­ber turned out to be not-so-much; in fact, Sep­tem­ber is a dis­tant mem­ory. You leave behind a few loose papers, maybe some hang­ers in the closet. Soon the painters will be here with five gal­lons of Detroit’s Orig­i­nal Xtra Hide Apart­ment Flat, and that will be the end of your chap­ter in this place.

OK, so not exactly a madeleine. Let’s move on.

I have so many sto­ries that begin “I knew the news­pa­per busi­ness was fin­ished when…” that I really look like an idiot. If I knew, why didn’t I leave when I had the chance? Answer: Because I’m lazy and inert, and suck at every­thing else. But here’s one of those I-knew moments, in the Pets aisle at Target:

puppypads

Do you real­ize, in a few more years, reporters won’t be able to make jokes about their work today being used to house­break dogs tomor­row? It’ll be like the expres­sion “drop­ping a dime.” What’s that? A pay phone? And it once cost a dime? Why didn’t they use Skype, grandpa? Shaddup, kid.

Finally, I’ve seen sev­eral of these vehi­cles around town in the last cou­ple years:

whokilledrosa

They have signs on posts, too, but at least two and maybe three white vehi­cles — I’ve seen an SUV and this van — with the same mes­sage. SOMEONE KILLED R*SA, and dammit, they’re going to let the world know about it. (I don’t dare use this woman’s name, as I sus­pect they troll Google every 30 min­utes, and the last mail­ing list I want to be on is theirs.) I went to the web­site, and it appears they do have a valid com­plaint; patients should not fall off the table in the cath lab. Nev­er­the­less, it’s pos­si­ble to view this as cruel and unusual pun­ish­ment for poor Dr. B*rman.

And now it’s been 15 min­utes, and I must begone. Begone! And have a swell day.

78 responses to
“Speedblogging.”

  1. coozledad said on July 7th, 2009 at 10:31 am

    I can see a mar­ket for those “alle­ga­tion vans”; espe­cially if you offer a lower rate for sim­ple insults.

  2. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 10:43 am

  3. Dorothy said on July 7th, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Happy 87th birth­day to my mom today! She’s with us for a lit­tle over two weeks while they work on the ele­va­tor in her apart­ment build­ing. I’m pick­ing her up in about a half hour and tak­ing her to lunch. Four co-workers are join­ing us, as is my hus­band, since she knows no one here in Mount Ver­non. Have to do lunch cuz I have rehearsal tonight — which means we can’t go to din­ner. Sorry Mum, but we’re gonna have a fun lunch anyway!

  4. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:07 am

    Will LAMary be pro­vid­ing us with ongo­ing com­men­tary regard­ing the lit­tle event planned in LA today?

  5. moe99 said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Do folks here know that Lance Arm­strong, along with Amer­i­cans Levi Leipheimer and Chris Horner, are cycling for Team Astana which is spon­sored by the City of Astana and the coun­try of Kaza­khstan? I hope Borat is there to cheer them on.

  6. Hattie said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:19 am

    Catch­ing up with your ever enter­tain­ing blog. And well writ­ten, of course.

  7. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    moe: yep, and I watch it every day, and took a break and TiVo’d the last hour of the team time tri­als . When I was a kid, I’d watch base­ball, bas­ket­ball, foot­ball, and have to dash out to play that sport a lit­tle bit — couldn’t wait.
    That left me , naturally…but I am an old timer now and after watch­ing cycling for a cou­ple hours I GOTSTA go for a bike ride!
    These tdf rid­ers are tough hom­bres! Hor­ri­ble crashes? No problem…the race-doctor will patch you up on the fly, out the car win­dow! Three nasty crashes today, but no elim­i­na­tions nec­es­sary for bro­ken bones …yet!

    Last year…this bike went a quar­ter mile down the moun­tain!
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​u​A​d​n​x​_4A2G8

  8. brian stouder said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    Dorothy — Happy birth­day to your ma!

    So, since she was born four score and seven years ago, if you go out for Ital­ian for lunch, it’s pos­si­ble she’ll end up with a gen­uine spaghetti blurred dress (lit­tle Penn­syl­va­nia joke, there) (very little!)

  9. Catherine said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:48 am

    Sue, if you want the MJ play-by-play, I rec­om­mend the live stream at http://​www​.scpr​.org/​p​r​o​g​r​a​m​s​/​a​i​rtalk/

    We’re for­tu­nate to have local pub­lic radio that’s all-news. The host, Larry Man­tle, is smart and funny. Cov­er­age starts at 10 Pacific.

    I have a meet­ing at 1:00 in Bur­bank, not far from For­est Lawn. Pray for me!

  10. LAMary said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    I got in to work at about 7:30, across the free­way from For­est Lawn. Lots of heli­copters hov­er­ing, and lots of CHPs guys and Sheriff’s Dept. along the free­way and along the closed For­est Lawn ramp. I think you’ll be ok in Bur­bank at 1, Cather­ine. It’s down­town that’s going to suck at that hour. It’s going to real time con­stant cov­er­age and com­men­tary going on for days, as well as months of law­suits over money, cus­tody, music rights.

  11. Julie Robinson said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    Happy Birth­day to Dorothy’s Mom, how ter­rific! Mine will be 77 later this month and seems to be going strong except for cataracts. We just spent the week­end with her and the rest of the fam, which is to say my sis­ter and our two kids. DH’s is 86 but sadly lost in Alzheimer’s.

    When I read that 20 lawyers had gone to court ini­tially, I won­dered if MJ’s estate will be like the infa­mous Jarndyce and Jarndyce in Bleak House. After years of lit­i­ga­tion the suit is finally set­tled but the entire estate has been emp­tied in the process.

  12. beb said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Your ghoul­ish thought for the day: Will they bury MJ like an ordi­nary per­son, in just a cas­ket cov­ered with dirt or are they plan­ning to bury in in some kind of huge con­crete vault to pre­vent sickos from dig­ging him up?

  13. moe99 said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Palin, like San­ford, can­not stop talking:

    http://​abc​news​.go​.com/​P​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​s​t​o​r​y​?​i​d​=​8​0​1​6​9​0​6​&​a​m​p​;​page=1

    …But as for whether another pur­suit of national office, as she did less than a year ago when she joined Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in the race for the White House, would result in the same polit­i­cal blood sport, Palin said there is a dif­fer­ence between the White House and what she has expe­ri­enced in Alaska. If she were in the White House, she said, the “depart­ment of law” would pro­tect her from base­less eth­i­cal allegations.

    “I think on a national level, your depart­ment of law there in the White House would look at some of the things that we’ve been charged with and auto­mat­i­cally throw them out,” she said.

    There is no “Depart­ment of Law” at the White House.…

  14. nancy said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Beb, I believe every­one gets a con­crete vault these days. The dirt-falling-on-polished-walnut shot you see in the movies is just artifice.

    Jews, I believe, still go for plain pine boxes and no vault, but for more ceme­ter­ies it’s now SOP.

  15. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:37 pm

    Oh for cry­ing out loud, beb! Now I’m going to be think­ing of Michael Jack­son relics show­ing up on ebay, lit­tle altars with cur­tained boxes flanked by can­dles in red votive cups, mag­i­cal heal­ing pow­ers assigned to var­i­ous body parts…

  16. coozledad said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

  17. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Del (re: last thread), i’m some­how not say­ing it right: i don’t think any terrorist/s test any one par­tic­u­lar politi­cian (there may be excep­tions, but rarely and w/ spe­cial cir­cum­stances). It’s the fact that for over a cen­tury now, acts of mass ter­ror have come with irreg­u­larly reg­u­lar reli­a­bil­ity. We’re due for another one, and it’s likely to have noth­ing to do with Osama. Which is what i think Biden was try­ing to say — there will be a ter­ror­ist attack in Obama’s first term, because, well, there will be, and peo­ple will watch to see how we han­dle it.

    I’ve been in a hat­ful (well, three) homes in Indi­ana & WV where there was a scarf under glass or in a case, and can­dles nearby — one had a cross behind it. They were thrown by Elvis dur­ing con­certs in his last few years. No one — as far as i could tell — actu­ally knelt and prayed in front of them, but they were the focus of atten­tion in the liv­ing rooms where they were arranged.

    So MJ gloves are only a mat­ter of time, right? Or did he throw those the way Elvis tossed scarves and towels?

    BTW, many fam­i­lies want to toss dirt onto the cof­fin, and do, though most leave before the low­er­ing. In my expe­ri­ence, maybe 1 in 10 stay to watch the low­er­ing (and most of those have a few who want to add some earth to the grave, and do), and 2 out of some 250 i’ve done insisted on stay­ing until the vault lid was set (now *there’s* a sound with final­ity) and the grave filled. Younger fam­ily mem­bers stepped up to the ceme­tery staff and cour­te­ously took the shov­els and said to the back­hoe oper­a­tor: thanks for mak­ing the grave, and we’ll take care of fill­ing in.

    And at one of those two, a fel­low whipped out a har­mon­ica when the sweat­ing and strain­ing was over, and played a lovely tune while his broth­ers smiled. They said “we wouldn’t have felt like we’d really laid Grandma to rest with­out doing that,” and i was hon­ored to help them fin­ish the task that way. YMMV.

    edit note: Coo­zledad, i love that web­site. It’s a book­mark bar fave.

  18. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:55 pm

    Cooz! Behave yourself.

  19. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 12:58 pm

  20. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    coo­zle­pops: Thanks for the inspi­ra­tion. I’ll have the cre­ma­tory save my head and dec­o­rate it for the kiddies.

  21. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    MMJ­eff, a lit­tle late on this, but did you hear that Stephen Col­bert called on cit­i­zens of Mis­souri to help Rep. Cyn­thia Davis climb the polit­i­cal lad­der by tak­ing her food away from her when­ever pos­si­ble? He thinks that she hasn’t risen far enough in her polit­i­cal career and it might be because she gets too much food and is there­fore not prop­erly moti­vated. Given that the Col­bert Nation rises to every chal­lenge, count on this hap­pen­ing next time she shows up at the cream puff or fried-thing-on-a-stick booth at the State Fair or some­thing. Per­son­ally, I hope the cam­eras are run­ning when it hap­pens.
    http://​www​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​2​0​0​9​/​0​7​/​0​2​/​c​o​l​b​e​r​t​-​t​e​l​l​s​-​v​i​e​w​e​r​s​-​t​o​_​n​_​2​2​4​6​2​8.html

  22. coozledad said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    I’m think­ing about being freeze-dried, spray painted black and stuck out by the road like one of those ply­wood cow­boy silhouettes.

  23. moe99 said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    C-dad,
    I have book­marked that site. It is fas­ci­nat­ing in a very odd way. Thanks!

  24. jeff borden said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I’m going with cre­ma­tion. No kids so there’d be no one to visit my grave any­how. Plus, it’s in keep­ing with Neil Young’s the­ory that it’s bet­ter to burn up than it is to rust (or rot).

  25. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    jeff…ever walk past the Jew­ish ceme­tery that’s very near Wrigley Field? (Racine Ave, Grace St., and Sem­i­nary Ave.) Totally weed cov­ered, top­pled stones…looks like nobody’s tended the graves for decades…this was a few years ago, maybe it’s been cleaned up?

  26. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:27 pm

    Hey, jour­nal­ists, what’s going on at the Wash­ing­ton Post? Access din­ners? Froomkin’s been hired by the Huff­in­g­ton Post, so he’s landed on his feet, sort of. But really, for-pay access dinners?

  27. coozledad said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    moe99: I liked their arti­cle on the Josephe­nium (sp?). Those wax anatom­i­cal mod­els are stunning.

  28. LAMary said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    I’m still telling the kids to put me on an ice flow and push me out to sea. If I’m dead, fine. If I’m nearly dead and just in the way, fine as well.

  29. Dorothy said on July 7th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Count Mike and I among the ones who will be cre­mated. I’d rather be dust sooner than later.

  30. basset said on July 7th, 2009 at 2:25 pm

    back to the van for a minute — wasn’t Geof­frey Fieger one of Dr. Kevorkian’s lawyers?

  31. LAMary said on July 7th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    That name sounded famil­iar to me too. I google it and yes, he was the guy on the Kevorkian and Jenny Jones cases.

  32. Rana said on July 7th, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    Cre­ma­tion here, though I’d con­sider green bur­ial if it were an option.

    I had a friend who wanted to be cre­mated and made into bone china. I always thought that sounded rather cool.

  33. 4dbirds said on July 7th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    No vault. Fire me up!!

  34. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

    No, folks, here’s what’s going to hap­pen. It will turn out that the Rap­ture is the real thing, and after spend­ing our later years at the Nancy Nall Nurs­ing Home (some of us in the Pot-and-Pizza wing, some of us in the Mar­garita Wing), because of a celes­tial com­puter glitch we will all be called up to Heaven together and spend eter­nity harass­ing the True Believ­ers and wav­ing to our friends down in Hell.

  35. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    Geof­frey Fieger is the brother of Doug Fieger of The Knack, too.
    Geof­frey was every­where in the media for years, mostly because of Dr. Jack, who I adored; Dr. Jack used a VW Microbus as a quickie-hospice ter­mi­nus.
    Fieger was in the papers all the time, at a time when I could get Detroit dailies out of a cash-box here, and I read about him all the time. He was also a fave guest of WJR-am 760 at dif­fer­ent times all through the day…I mean, you couldn’t be even remotely con­nected (like I was) to Detroit and not know every­thing about Geof­frey Fieger.

    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​T​h​e​_Knack

  36. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 3:44 pm

    Sue…some of will end up in the Ash­ley Mor­ris wing of Reme­dial Writ­ing Skills, imi­tat­ing Pro­fes­sor Ash­ley, call­ing out to class­mates “You fuck­ing FUCKMOOKS!”

  37. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    Oh, I want to be in that wing! Can we all wear sweat­shirts with FYYFF on them?

  38. 4dbirds said on July 7th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    Dex­ter was that sar­casm about Dr. Jack? Some­times I miss the fine line of sar­casm. I think Dr. Jack was a ser­ial killer. I know he made a good argu­ment ref dig­nity, pain­less, right to die etc, but some­thing about him was too eager to see peo­ple go.

  39. alex said on July 7th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Kevorkian was a creepy per­son­al­ity, to be sure, but when you’d see the tes­ti­mony of the fam­i­lies he assisted you couldn’t help but believe in what he was doing. This was exactly why juries exon­ner­ated him every time. Except of course for the time he decided to be his own lawyer — never a smart move — and was pre­vented from hav­ing such wit­nesses tes­tify on his behalf.

    Kevorkian cer­tainly was not the best mes­sen­ger for what is oth­er­wise a very wor­thy cause. And Fieger came across as an unsym­pa­thetic per­son­al­ity also.

  40. Lex said on July 7th, 2009 at 4:52 pm

    Re the van, I saw a twist on that here the other day: an SUV with a spare-tire cover embla­zoned with some­thing on the order of “Remove [child’s name] from DSS cus­tody!” and a URL. Was dri­ving so couldn’t take photo.

  41. moe99 said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Okay, I have a dumb Michael Jack­son ques­tion because I am not up on my MJ lore. Are his kids related to him by blood? I am assum­ing it was in vitro fer­til­iza­tion but I really don’t know.

  42. LAMary said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    Seems like the memo­r­ial ser­vice went along with­out a hitch and there was no crowd crazi­ness or traf­fic melt­downs. We had some heli­copter action here about an hour ago, but I don’t think it was related. Likely was a trans­fer of a patient to or from some other facility.

  43. nancy said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    It is said to be widely known that the Jack­son tots are not genet­i­cally related, that he used a sperm donor and per­haps an egg donor, although obvi­ously none of this has ever been con­firmed. How­ever, it is a source of baf­fle­ment to me to see MJ so fiercely embraced by the black com­mu­nity when it is so obvi­ous his racial iden­tity was a source of pain and self-loathing, and I’M SORRY BUT HOW MUCH MORE OBVIOUS DOES IT HAVE TO BE THAN THE FACT THE GUY CHOSE TO HAVE WHITE CHILDREN, AND, and …

    God, what a fool’s game even think­ing about this is. I’d best leave it for Hank. Some­one sent me the YouTube link to the sob­bing daugh­ter, and it sent me off the rails for a moment. Who. ARE. These. HIDEOUS. People?

  44. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    4birds: Dr. Jack is a hero for a con­tro­ver­sial cause. Hey, it’s an either/or choice. Deep seated reli­gious views pre­vent many peo­ple from see­ing things Dr. Jack’s way, I know. I respect your view­point, and I am not a cru­sader for assisted sui­cide, I just believe in it as an alter­na­tive that should be a legal choice, like that other soci­etal issue that gets peo­ple killed in this great country.

  45. LAMary said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    Liz Tay­lor didn’t even go to the ser­vice. We were spared that.

  46. Sue said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    My Michael Jack­son ques­tion is: how was he rais­ing his kids? How can a man who has absolutely no idea of what a nor­mal child­hood is, who seemed to fre­quently con­fuse fan­tasy with real­ity, whose expe­ri­ence with child­hood dis­ci­pline included fre­quent use of a belt, raise kids by the nor­mal method (do what you think is right and then hope for the best)? My guess is that the atmos­phere in the house was sim­i­lar to Nev­er­land before Wendy showed up.
    Edit: and another ques­tion: who’s going to play him in the movie? I can hear you all scream­ing now. I guess Johnny Depp.

  47. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    nance: I tried my damn­d­est to avoid this event on TV, but Mrs. had it on and I noticed the huge back­drop was a blow-up of the African-American MJ, not the white-looking, clown­ish appear­ing MJ. While I was in the room where she had it on the teevee, I heard MLK’s chil­dren prais­ing Jack­son for being the best or whatever…well, I found myself recall­ing for­mer send­offs for music greats, a cou­ple, Miles Davis and Dex­ter Gor­don, barely got men­tioned off the obit page.

  48. Dexter said on July 7th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

    Opie and Anthony (XM 202, Sir­ius 197) were mak­ing fun of young MJ’s home Christ­mases with Papa Joe…wonder what that was all about…?

  49. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 7th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Johnny Depp would prob­a­bly pull it off, and with class and with­out recrim­i­na­tions from any side … speak­ing of which, and remem­ber­ing who rushes in where angels fear to tread:

    Nancy, i’d pull that obser­va­tion back a notch or two. The fact of the mat­ter is that the African-American com­mu­nity has a long stand­ing, vexed, ambiva­lent rela­tion­ship with the ques­tion of skin tone. Leave aside the whole vitiligo/lupus/auto-immune thing, which Deepak Chopra said really was a prob­lem (not my pre­ferred med­ical source on any sub­ject, but an MD who has been can­did about his attempts and his weak­ness in try­ing to mount an inter­ven­tion for Jackson).

    Read Haley’s “The Auto­bi­og­ra­phy of Mal­colm X” and you’ll encounter lit­er­ally sear­ing descrip­tions of what “conk­ing” your hair by home­brew was like, back in the day, just to get it a bit straighter, and what it meant to be “Detroit Red” with the lighter shade of not-pale. You get a bit more about what’s involved with chas­ing women who are blond, let alone white.

    Then try out Spike Lee’s films, where he gets painfully spe­cific in most and spent a whole pic­ture once try­ing to get at the mul­ti­ple mean­ings of light­ness for black­ness among Blacks (“School Daze”), let alone in “Jun­gle Fever.” And then watch the var­i­ous shad­ings in Tyler Perry’s films of how char­ac­ters pair off and relate, very often along the brown­ness spectrum.

    It just doesn’t track with the real­ity of the African Amer­i­can expe­ri­ence, as i very much sec­ond­hand­edly under­stand it, to say he was self-loathing or “wanted to be white.” That’s part of it, but it nowhere near sums it up. I say all of this sim­ply because i don’t under­stand it, but i do under­stand that blacks of my acquain­tance are very sen­si­tive about cri­tiques, par­tic­u­larly from whites, about hair straight­en­ing, skin bleach­ing (extremely com­mon in more upper-middle-class com­mu­ni­ties, less so in wealthy or poorer black com­mu­ni­ties), or, yes, nose jobs. I’ve heard lots of Jew­ish folk i’ve known talk rel­a­tively casu­ally about rhino­plasty among them and theirs, but African Amer­i­cans are very uncom­fort­able about either talk­ing about the sub­ject, or hear­ing oth­ers crit­i­cize it. But ask a plas­tic sur­geon about the sub­ject, and with a quick glance over the shoul­der, they will say “yeah, hap­pens all the time, and the weird thing is, it’s usu­ally such a small change it doesn’t even seem worth it.”

    Just thought you’d like to hear that side of it …

  50. Jeff Borden said on July 7th, 2009 at 6:39 pm

    Dex­ter,

    I ride my bike past the Jew­ish ceme­tery you ref­er­enced each time I go to Wrigley Field, most recently last night. It remains some­thing of an eye­sore, but there have been some efforts to clean it up. It prob­a­bly would be a great story to chase. Years ago, when I was at Crain’s Chicago Busi­ness, we had a front page story on a ceme­tery that had gone bank­rupt. The “per­pet­ual care” funds had been lost in some sort of stock crash. I’m rather proud of the fact that the head­line I sug­gested ran above the story: “Night of the Liv­ing Debt.”

    The most poignant Jew­ish ceme­tery I’ve ever seen is in Prague. Ram­pant anti-semitism gave the Jews only a tiny, tiny, tiny patch of land on which to bury their dead, so head­stones are lit­er­ally inches away from each other. And, in the great tra­di­tion, most of the head­stones have piles of small stones and rocks on top. The build­ing nearby had been a Jew­ish com­mu­nity cen­ter. It is now a memo­r­ial to the thou­sands of Czech Jews shipped to the death camps. The names and dates of birth and death are listed from floor to ceil­ing in an unend­ing cas­cade of let­ters as you walk from room to room.

    The most heart-rending part of the visit was learn­ing about a Jew­ish art teacher, who asked the chil­dren who had been shipped to the camps to paint and draw what they saw. Some­how, these works were pre­served. You look at them and below is the name of the child and whether or not they sur­vived the camp. Most did not.

  51. joodyb said on July 7th, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    may i just say i love the word ‘bunt.’

    and who’s for going ahead and mak­ing up some of them FYYFF sweat­shirts? cuz i’m in.

  52. brian stouder said on July 7th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

    Years ago — in fact, it was Pam’s and my honeymoon(!) — we vis­ited the National Bat­tle­field Park and the National Cemetary at Shiloh, and while the Union boys’ remains reside (for the most part) within marked graves on a beau­ti­ful bluff above the Ten­nessee River, with lots of ground flow­ers and mature shade trees, if you won­der the bat­tle­field you occa­sion­ally come across muted mark­ers that indi­cate this or that 100 foot strip con­tains the remains of (for exam­ple) 475 Con­fed­er­ate sol­diers, give or take.

    This caused me to stop and pon­der; In any case, lots of long-forgotten heart­break in the pretty cemetary and in the blunt mass graves…I won­dered — if given the choice — which alter­na­tive the sol­diers would have selected.

    But let’s leave old Death aside (‘ask not for whom the bell tolls’ — and all of that, right?); in two weeks we’ll have a major, major 40th anniver­sary to talk about — one where my par­ents lit­er­ally did “wake the kids and phone the neigh­bors”; a his­toric moment that was also no less an iconic cultural/political/societal hap­pen­ing; the night the cur­tain rose for the orig­i­nal ‘moon-walker’ moves by that fel­low from an Apollo stage, by way of Wapakoneta (instead of Gary).

    Really, it should get at least 10% of the blan­ket pun­ditry and archival recaps that Michael Jackson’s pass­ing has got­ten, yes?

    After­all, all of us folks of a cer­tain age know pre­cisely where we were that night, yes?

  53. nancy said on July 7th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    Inter­est­ing thoughts as usual, Jeff. I’ll give you the vitiligo, but you have to give me the nose. And the lips. And the hair. And the white kids. That’s 4 – 1. I win!

    Actu­ally, I remem­ber when Spike Lee was openly crit­i­cal of MJ, accus­ing him of race hatred, etc. That was a dif­fer­ent Spike Lee, how­ever, back when he talked about send­ing his kids to pub­lic schools, etc. Then he mar­ried a bup­pie lawyer wor­thy of being pres­i­dent of the soror­ity in “School Daze” and I’m fairly sure he’s prep school all the way now.

    I’m fully aware I’m not wor­thy of express­ing an opin­ion on this to an actual African-American, but lordy, am I sick of the whole Jack­son clan. It was the clip of the sob­bing daugh­ter that did it, and how her whole fam­ily seemed more con­cerned that she “speak up” and directly into the micro­phone than any­thing else. They learned from the best, sure, but at this point I only want a pox upon all their houses.

  54. Catherine said on July 7th, 2009 at 8:37 pm

    You can’t assume those kids are 1) white; and 2) not his, based on looks alone. In my cir­cle there are lots of chil­dren of inter­ra­cial cou­ples and some of them look just like Paris (the daugh­ter), down to the blue eyes. Hear­ken­ing back to 10th grade biol­ogy, all you need is two reces­sive blue eye genes. Many, many African Amer­i­cans have white ances­tors, and reces­sive genes can get passed along for gen­er­a­tions with­out being expressed. So you’re still at 3 – 2, if you’re keep­ing score, and I’m not argu­ing too much with the over­all point, but let’s give the kids a break.

  55. moe99 said on July 7th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    Well, this is the first time I’ve seen the kids with­out their masks on and I was star­tled at how very unlike Jack­son they look. And I seem to recall that it was arti­fi­cial insem­i­na­tion that was used for con­cep­tion with no real des­ig­na­tion of who the father was at the time. And I won­dered if the mask­ing was done to try and keep these sorts of inquiries to a min­i­mum.
    And on the con­verse we have Angelina Jolie and Madonna adopt­ing chil­dren of another race with lit­tle com­ment. So why would MJ feel the need for all this secrecy if that’s what was going on?

  56. nancy said on July 7th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    I’m know a lot of bira­cial peo­ple with light eyes, but not too many tow­heads. Agreed, how­ever, that kids are kids and should be left alone.

  57. beb said on July 7th, 2009 at 9:26 pm

    I’m with JTMMO on this. Color is a big issue among peo­ple of color. Look at all the suc­cess­ful black men who’ve mar­ried white women. At the same time Nancy dies have a point that MJ’s chil­dren are, from all appear­ances, white. The big­ger point is that Jack­son was really messed up. The sug­ges­tion that Jack­son used a sperm donor instead of donat­ing his own sug­gests that at age 50, Jack­son may have been a vir­gin. An hon­est to god, lit­eral 50 year old virgin.

    But enough of Jack­son. What are the odds that Sen­a­tor Al Franken will go an entire year in Con­gress with­out crack­ing one joke? I think they’re pretty good.

  58. Jolene said on July 7th, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    Nancy, that tow­head­ed­ness came from a bot­tle. Here’s a pic­ture of the three kids from today. Also, I saw an ear­lier pic­ture some­where in which his roots were show­ing. Joe Jack­son, Michael’s father, report­edly has blue eyes.

    It’s kind of sur­pris­ing that some­one as vain as Jack­son would have wanted some­one other than his own won­der­ful self to father his children.

  59. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 7th, 2009 at 9:43 pm

    Janet say­ing “honey, speak into the mike” really broke into the moment … or brought us back to real­ity. The idea that this is more about celebritism than racism i can buy into wholeheartedly.

  60. Jolene said on July 7th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    One more pic­ture. In this one, it’s clear all three kids have light brown skin. And, in this photo, the older son looks a bit like the younger, and both boys have some­what broad noses.

  61. nancy said on July 7th, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    I can’t believe we’re dis­cussing this, but…

    Tow­headed kids almost always darken with age, and not much age at that. You’re look­ing at one.

    That said, I still think those kids are white, what­ever white means.

  62. Jolene said on July 7th, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    I agree. It’s a weird dis­cus­sion to be hav­ing, and I wouldn’t nec­es­sar­ily argue that the chil­drens’ father wasn’t white. But I don’t think that kid was a nat­ural tow­head. If I come across the other pic­ture (the one w/ the roots) again, I’ll post a link.

    In the mean­time, if you want detail re how bizarre MJ might really have been, there’s noth­ing like the arti­cles pub­lished by Mau­reen Orth in Van­ity Fair.

  63. moe99 said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    Orth’s last arti­cle in the series indi­cates that the nat­ural father of Rowe’s chil­dren was prob­a­bly white. That’s a dev­as­tat­ing arti­cle. Will read the oth­ers as well. Thanks for the lead, Jolene.

  64. Jolene said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    I’ve read sev­eral of the Orth pieces, and found them both hor­ri­fy­ing and frus­trat­ing – hor­ri­fy­ing because of the story she tells and frus­trat­ing because the sto­ries are so weakly doc­u­mented. Many of her inter­views were off-the-record, and there are many second-hand reports.

  65. velvet goldmine said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:22 pm

    I got the impres­sion that Paris’ wish to address the crowd was a sud­den deci­sion of hers, and I can’t say it pushed me over the edge into out­rage. I felt the way one does when one sees a child at a parent’s funeral: Pretty torn up. She wanted to say some­thing, and the adults around her (aunts and uncles) were help­ing her, just like you see at a mil­lion school assem­blies and grad­u­a­tion cer­e­monies. Noth­ing to sneer about, in my opinion.

  66. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    The event is hard to get a grip on from news bits and YouTube snip­pets (i don’t have either the con­nec­tion speed or the time to watch the whole deal), but i have to admit i’m grabbed by the idea that his favorite song is one writ­ten by Char­lie Chap­lin. That takes my head in mul­ti­ple direc­tions, and just adds to the poignancy of the whole thing.

  67. velvet goldmine said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    I saw an ambush inter­view with a man alleged to me the older kids’ bio­log­i­cal father. If he is, I’m sorry — those kids dodged some major genetic bul­lets. They are absolutely gor­geous and this man and Deb­bie Rowe are on the plain-to-average side, one would prob­a­bly have to say.

    The kids look bira­cial to me, but what the hell do I know?

  68. del said on July 7th, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    I enjoyed MJ’s music, and, if a karoake machine’s around would per­form “I Want You Back” at the drop of a hat. But cov­er­age of his death is revolt­ing. Just revolt­ing. It’s so dis­turb­ing because, to me, it high­lights the Cas­san­dra night­mare that cer­tain poor chil­dren had to endure. Weren’t there chil­dren whose own moth­ers “sold” them for adven­tures at Nev­er­land? Fuckmooks.

    JTTMO, point taken (though I will say that after my post last night I saw a clip on The Daily Show of a wingnut on FOX who sur­mised that only a Bin laden attack could save us from Obama.)

  69. Catherine said on July 8th, 2009 at 1:01 am

    If the chil­dren are not genet­i­cally MJ’s, and he didn’t legally adopt them, then they are in a cus­to­dial no-man’s-land. As dis­or­dered, irre­spon­si­ble and self-destructive as he appar­ently was, you’d think that the attor­neys who got him to exe­cute that will would have made sure that the cus­tody issues were taken care of, too. That’s one rea­son I ulti­mately think they are genet­i­cally his.

    Is any­one else think­ing about John Lennon’s death?

  70. Jolene said on July 8th, 2009 at 1:20 am

    I’m not sure that’s cor­rect, Cather­ine. I’ve heard sev­eral attor­neys say that, under the law, they are his chil­dren. In the case of the two older chil­dren, he was mar­ried to the woman who gave birth to them, which makes him the father regard­less of their genetic con­nec­tion. And, pre­sum­ably, there was a con­tract that makes him the father of the youngest child. Per­haps one of our lawyers can comment.

    Not sure what your ref­er­ence to John Lennon was about.

  71. basset said on July 8th, 2009 at 8:03 am

    maybe Cather­ine meant Ringo’s birth­day, which was yes­ter­day… his 69th, the old­est Beatle.

  72. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 8th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Lennon’s death seems like the last time before this that a celebrity death gar­nered so much media and cul­tural atten­tion, over as long a period. In between have been polit­i­cal deaths and extended funer­ary folderol, but from Lennon to Jack­son i can’t think of any other pure celeb that got this sort of gen­eral cul­tural conversation.

  73. basset said on July 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am

    well, yeah, but the nature of media was so dif­fer­ent then. and I sup­pose MJ had some effect on mass cul­ture, but com­pared to the Bea­t­les? no way.

    mean­while… I see another “lost” Bea­t­les track has been dredged up and is sup­posed to go on release soon, some old demo that the sur­viv­ing Fabs added parts to… far enough back that George is on it. come on now, this stuff didn’t get released way back when for a reason.

  74. Julie Robinson said on July 8th, 2009 at 8:39 am

    With all respect to Jeff tmmo and celebrity deaths, Princess Diana.

    Valu­ing lighter skin is com­mon in many cul­tures around the world, espe­cially India.
    Our daugh­ter was telling us about her exchange stu­dent from Indone­sia, who had got­ten a tan here and was very wor­ried about her friends’ reac­tions. She felt she had dropped a notch or two in social sta­tus. She is smart, well-off, and beau­ti­ful, and yet she val­ues her­self by skin color.

  75. moe99 said on July 8th, 2009 at 8:58 am

    There is a legal pre­sump­tion that chil­dren born to cou­ples in wed­lock are the legit­i­mate off­spring of the par­ents. So, Jolene would be right wrt to the older two of Jackson’s chil­dren. Have no idea about the third and I have been stay­ing as far away from the deba­cle as possible.

  76. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 8th, 2009 at 9:27 am

    Well, you can’t call Diana an enter­tainer … or can you? But she surely wasn’t a politician.

  77. LA Mary said on July 8th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    The kids mom said a while back that MJ is not the father, and yes, kids can be nearly plat­inum blonde and their hair dark­ens. I have two of those kids. One is still blonde but a dark blonde, the other brown. I don’t think MJ’s a vir­gin, but I think he wanted white kids just as he wanted white wives.

  78. 4dbirds said on July 8th, 2009 at 10:25 am

    Lisa Marie Press­ley stated that there was sex in their mar­riage. Why do I know these things?