nancynall.com » Stay awake for it.

Stay awake for it.

My search for the ideal stim­u­lant con­tin­ues. I’m try­ing to find that elu­sive pick-me-up that I can down some­time around 10 p.m. that will keep me alert until 1 a.m., but still let me sleep after­ward. Two cups of cof­fee han­dle the stay-awake part, but sour my stom­ach for sleep­ing. Energy drinks make me feel like a 51-year-old in baggy shorts, tryin’ to hang with the kids. Today I got a brain­storm — a mem­ory, actu­ally. Morn­ing Thun­der.

My friend Paul hated cof­fee but needed seri­ous stim­u­la­tion to get going in the morn­ing, and used to drink a gigan­tic tankard of Celes­tial Sea­son­ings’ Morn­ing Thun­der tea, with four or five bags steep­ing in there. It was a pretty vile drink, but it did the trick. I tried it for a while (one bag at a time), but dropped it when I got tired of peo­ple mak­ing poop jokes about my bev­er­age. (What brings on the famous 10 a.m. ses­sion with the morn­ing paper, any­way? Is it the ali­men­tary canal mak­ing room for break­fast, the hot liq­uid or the caf­feine? And why does it mostly affect men? I’ve never known one who didn’t need a lit­tle me-time at mid­morn­ing.) After a while, it made me asso­ciate Morn­ing Thun­der with boom-booms, and by then I had devel­oped the oblig­a­tory journalist’s taste for ran­cid news­room cof­fee, which was free.

But with this unusual need for a spe­cific eye-opener, maybe it’s time to check out the M.T. again. So I stopped where I never do — the tea sec­tion at the super­mar­ket.

It’s kind of depress­ing. Tea runs in cycles like every­thing else, and now we’re deep into the relax­ation thing. With eye-opening del­e­gated to Star­bucks and dark-roast ara­bica beans, tea has to take the oppo­site tack, and the most com­mon word is decaf­feinated, along with calm­ing and seren­ity. No Morn­ing Thun­der in evi­dence. Ah, well.

Last night a triple-e from Star­bucks at 8:45 did the trick mag­nif­i­cently. Drowsi­ness arrived at 12:55 a.m. If I try it tonight, it’ll either be too much or too lit­tle.

Do the guys at Star­bucks try to speak Ital­ian to you, too? “Here’s your trip­plio,” or what­ever; I wasn’t tak­ing notes. Some­times, when I feel like mak­ing my triple a dessert, I’ll order it with whipped cream. Trip­plio con panna, the baris­tas say. They’re prob­a­bly the same wiseasses who refer to Detroit as day-twah. Blech.

What a pleas­ant week­end, made for long bike rides, a lit­tle weightlift­ing and a pass through the Nordstrom’s shoe sale. The Steve Mad­den boots I’ve been eye­ing keep falling in price, but they’re still not a jus­ti­fi­able pur­chase. I don’t have the legs, or the youth, to stuff jeans into boots any­more. And Kate will give up her Ed Hardy sneak­ers when they pry them off her cold, dead feet. Best would be a cool pair of ankle boots, but the only ones like that they’re mak­ing these days have tow­er­ing heels. My knees hurt just look­ing at them. Where is a woman some­where between stilet­tos and Hush Pup­pies to find her footwear? Not at Nordstrom’s shoe sale, evi­dently.

As you can see, friends, I have very lit­tle today. I stayed away from my com­puter for a cou­ple of days and strongly rec­om­mend it, except for the pile of e-mail that accu­mu­lates under the slot. And I didn’t get too much blog­gage, but a lit­tle:

New York mag­a­zine looks at the birther/wacker far right. What a bunch of maroons.

And now off to begin manic Mon­day. Kate woke up with a sore throat and informs me it’s sweepin’ the school­yard. Oh, joy.

89 responses to
“Stay awake for it.”

  1. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 9:52 am

    Find me a news­room that still has a cof­feepot. Haven’t see one in years. Last sight­ing, a tv sta­tion news studio’s break­room, but oth­er­wise, it’s microwaves and bring your own nox­ious pow­ders.

  2. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:24 am

    I’m send­ing this to every­one i can, since it puts the basic facts behind the prob­lem in clear enough terms for a House staffer to under­stand: http://​www​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​w​p​-​d​y​n​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​9​/​1​9​/​A​R​2​0​0​9​0​9​1​9​0​0​1​1​2.html

    Lots of “sauce for the gan­der” in the NY mag arti­cle — adroit use of “appar­ently lucra­tive” and “but still,” and you have to get to the end of page three to learn that the heart of the birther move­ment springs from a group of PUMAs. It’s like Bob Her­bert in the NYT this week­end and all the oth­ers talk­ing about “right-wing haters” killing JFK . . . Oswald emi­grated to the Soviet Union, for pity’s sake, and came back for the fresh pro­duce with his Russ­ian wife, but was furi­ous with Kennedy for his *anti-communism* which obvi­ously adds up to con­ser­v­a­tive blame for his assas­si­na­tion.

    Pelosi mak­ing Capt. Twinkie a metaphor for her deep fears (yes, Dan was a Repub­li­can, but as any­one who saw “Milk” knows, he was also quite unsta­ble and ide­o­log­i­cally a mess) would be funny if it weren’t so infu­ri­at­ing. We’re blam­ing peo­ple for oppos­ing a major ini­tia­tive which has seen a nation­ally tele­vised speech to a joint ses­sion of Con­gress, a full Gins­burg (not really, since Bill drove around to all the shows, and the Pres. had them come to him, but fine), and still there’s no one who can tell us what the “plan” actu­ally is, includ­ing the holder of the bully pul­pit itself.

    I’m feel­ing like one of those kids in the insur­ance ads with the pony or bike or toy truck. “That’s a piece of junk” just evokes “I made that, pretty good, huh?” So far, we’re just get­ting card­board cutouts, and being told we’re greedy or ungrate­ful for not want­ing to trade our truck for the prop. And i don’t think the “excise tax” penalty for not hav­ing insur­ance is going to fly with any demo­graphic, other than the “we know this is all just cover for edg­ing towards sin­gle payer, neener neener neener” seg­ment of the elec­torate.

  3. brian stouder said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Well, I’ve never been a cof­fee man. I pre­fer my caf­feine to be icy cold and fizzy. In our work­place, we recently, we did away with the old fash­ioned light switches in our bath­rooms. In the past, lights in such out of the way places might remain on all night, or all week­end. Now, you walk in and twist a knob, and up to an hour is then on a timer. Thanks to my Diect Coke, I make my share of stop-and-goes, and of course the nor­mal expe­ri­ence is that you walk into the room and the light is already on; it is easy to for­get all about the timers, and you might only have a minute or two of light remain­ing(!) So – in the first week that we had these knobs, I walked into a dark bath­room and twisted the knob, and just as I was attend­ing to busi­ness, a some­what sheep­ish voice from inside the stall said “thank you”! (and the kicker is, he was the guy who made this energy sav­ing change!)

  4. Rana said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:41 am

    I always order a “small” when I’m at Star­bucks, and the baris­tas pre­tend that I asked for the “Tall” which is the same thing. I did dis­cover, dur­ing a visit to Japan, that Japan­ese Star­bucks baris­tas use “tall,” “grande” and “vente” the same as in the States, so you can get your fix with­out know­ing Japan­ese.

    My cho­les­terol counts are deemed to be through the roof, so this week my doc­tor put me on Crestor. What’s laugh­able is that one of the side effects to watch for is mus­cle pain… and I’m resum­ing jog­ging to deal with the HDL side of the equa­tion. Heh. On the other hand, I am get­ting tons of amuse­ment from my new jog­ging shoes, which are the sil­li­est things ever, but boy are they fun to run in: http://​www​.vibram​fivefin​gers​.com/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​s​/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​s​_​S​p​r​i​n​t​_f.cfm

    (I’ve long had a love-hate rela­tion­ship with shoes, as I have wide fronts, nar­row backs, high arches, and sen­si­tive skin, which means I have a closet full of shoes that I switch among when one gets to be too uncom­fort­able to wear. So far these haven’t given me any prob­lems, but I don’t see myself wear­ing them to work any­time soon!)

    Regard­ing health care and insur­ance reform, there’s an inter­est­ing take on it here: http://​www​.ian​welsh​.net/​t​h​e​-​p​r​o​b​l​e​m​-​w​i​t​h​-​h​e​a​l​t​h​c​a​r​e​-​r​e​f​o​r​m​-​i​s​n​t​-​t​h​e​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​-​p​eople/

  5. Rana said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:42 am

    brian, that’s hilar­i­ous. :)

  6. Bill White said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:45 am

    I recently dis­cov­ered Eng­lish break­fast tea – just enough caf­feine to set you up and clear your mind for a few hours.

  7. Carolyn said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:54 am

    Cof­fee is still strong and free in this South Florida news­room. Was nearly cut in the last go-round, but some things are still sacred.

  8. coozledad said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:59 am

    I ate a lot of ephedrine based stim­u­lants in col­lege, but all they seemed to do was make my scalp tin­gle as I fell asleep. For awhile I used to add a small amount of Ma Huang to my tea before going to the gym, until I found out that ephedra often mys­te­ri­ously causes stroke or pul­monary embo­lus, par­tic­u­larly in peo­ple who are work­ing out.
    The only thing that halfway works for me is about six table­spoons of French roast ground to a fine pow­der and steeped in a cof­fee press for about five min­utes. If noth­ing else, it makes you look awake.

  9. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 11:01 am

    Rana, ditto with my feet and my shoes. I have duck feet with high insteps and high arches. Clogs work but I get really tired of them. Today I’m wear­ing very cute bal­let flats but I know my feet will hurt by the end of the day.

  10. Jen said on September 21st, 2009 at 11:09 am

    We have a cof­feepot in our news­room (actu­ally, in the break­room down the hall from the news­room), but it is sup­plied by the peo­ple who drink cof­fee, not the com­pany. I gen­er­ally drink my Diet Coke or Diet Moun­tain Dew instead, or make cof­fee (with fancy fla­vored creamer – one of my rare indul­gences) at home. I just about have to have caf­feine in the morn­ings to func­tion, although it’s not really a huge deal on days I don’t have to work – I can wait until the mid­dle of the day before I need a pop or cof­fee.

    I laughed at your talk about the 10 a.m. “appoint­ment” with the morn­ing paper. Back when we were an after­noon paper and every­one was in the office by 7 a.m., we could just about set a clock by our edi­tor. The only think that sucked was when one of the women wanted to read the paper and had to dart into the men’s room to retrieve it. Thank­fully, the guys usu­ally just read the sports page, which we usu­ally didn’t need.

  11. coozledad said on September 21st, 2009 at 11:21 am

  12. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 11:26 am

    JTMMO, I don’t think Pelosi was say­ing any­thing about Dan White’s party affil­i­a­tion. She was refer­ring to the type of ugly pub­lic talk about Milk and Mosconi. It wasn’t about pol­i­tics; it was about hate and fear, and that’s going on now about Obama. He’s Hitler and a com­mie and a secret Mus­lim.
    I remem­ber in ’91 hear­ing my brother and a friend of his talk about how much they hated Hillary Clin­ton. Noth­ing spe­cific, just hated her. Bill Clin­ton hadn’t even been nom­i­nated yet, but Hillary was a ball buster and a com­mie and a bitch. Why? She just was. Obama is a tax raiser and wants to kill peo­ple and give African Amer­i­cans more then white folks get. Why? He just does.
    This isn’t polit­i­cal dis­course. It’s a giant tantrum by peo­ple who didn’t get their way. Unfor­tu­nately, they have guns and jack­asses like Glenn Beck and Rush Lim­baugh who turn free speech into a way to make lots of money stir­ring up lots of peo­ple who can’t quite put their fin­ger on what they hate about Obama. Or rather they don’t want to know what it really is because it’s so embar­ras­ing to admit you’re a racist.
    Not every­one who dis­agrees with Obama is a racist, obvi­ously, but many are. Many of the most vocal are. Just as the peo­ple who hated Har­vey Milk and Mayor Mosconi weren’t nec­es­sar­ily homo­pho­bic.

  13. moe99 said on September 21st, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Well they don’t call them cof­fee BEANS for noth­ing!

    Looks like birther lawyer, Orly Taitz is in a hell of a lot of trou­ble:

    http://​tinyurl​.com/​l4rnkx

    Not that there’s any­thing wrong with that.

  14. adrianne said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:09 pm

    I’m with Rana – I stead­fastly refuse to order a Star­bucks “tall” drink when what I want is small. Small is all this ‘mer­i­can is going to order, dammit!

    Our edi­tor, a cof­fee addict, pur­chased one of those Keurig one cup at a time cof­fee machines, with the lit­tle vacuum-packed cof­fees. Nuthin’ like a lit­tle French vanilla in the mid­dle of the morn­ing!

  15. Dorothy said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    Not a cof­fee drinker here – and my daugh­ter sent me a $5 gift cer­tifi­cate to http://​www​.ada​gio​.com for teas. I’m lov­ing all the tea I have bought so far. Well, wait, not so much love for the Hazel­nut. I love the smell of hazel­nut cof­fee – so why is it not very yummy in tea vari­ety? I’m not sure if they have the Morn­ing Thun­der, but I did buy some gun­pow­der tea recently. Have not tried it yet. The Christ­mas tea was very good, and so is the peach, apri­cot, Earl Grey and rasp­berry.

    Don’t you have DSW Shoe stores in Day-twah, Nancy? You can order online if you don’t have one to browse through in per­son. I have had good luck with the two or three pair I have ordered on line. But there’s noth­ing quite like the fix of going shoe shop­ping. Just the smell of the store is enough to get me going!!

    Adri­anne – we got one of those machines about a year ago in my office and they are very pop­u­lar. All the cof­fee drinkers in my divi­sion love it.

  16. beb said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    And to add to what LAMary says above, this was what Bob Her­bert was talk­ing about regard­ing JFK. Dal­las Texas at that time was filled with peo­ple who were mad, crazy angry and blamed Kennedy for every­thing that had gone wrong. I lived through one pres­i­den­tal assas­si­na­tion. I don’t want to live through another.

    As for Nancy: this desire for some­thing to keep you up through 1AM and then put you down for 8 hours sounds a lit­tle Michael Jackson-ish. A drug for this, a drug to coun­ter­act that… Not good.

    I’m sure they still sell black tea, just make a strong pot of it. That should have enough caf­feine to get your through the night…

  17. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    Go to Zap​pos​.com and become a vip mem­ber. Free overnight ship­ping, free ship­ping on returns, and instant credit when you notify them you are return­ing some­thing.

    https://​secure​-vip​.zap​pos​.com/​v​i​p​SignIn

  18. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    LAMary, it sounds like we may agree more than not — i think there’s plenty of room for Repub­li­can lead­ers to con­demn racism among pro­tes­tors even while i’m cer­tain that much of the “gasp, racism!” talk is insin­cerely ginned up by Shrum et alia. Now, we need some GOP lead­ers, since the absence of any­one to fill that bill is a vac­uum filled by Lim­baugh and Beck. I don’t think they con­sti­tute lead­ers in any mean­ing­ful way, but it’s hard to argue that they aren’t lead­ers short of being able to point at some­one else and say “no, THAT’S our lead­er­ship.” We don’t got that yet. Paw­lenty, Jin­dal, and a few oth­ers are still a few turns on the pub­lic spit away from being done; we all know what hap­pened the last time we put an under­cooked entree out on the buf­fet. Half-Baked Alaska.

    That still doesn’t mean i can’t fume over the absolute nasty hate­ful­ness i lis­tened to re: Bush for eight years, which appar­ently didn’t hap­pen, or doesn’t count because it was “true” while any rumor-mongering about Obama is “racist lies.” You could say in parades, in print, or in per­son any­thing at all about Bush, and it was just “pol­i­tics ain’t bean­bag.” Now, if i say “Obama has no plan, and wants me and my descen­dants to pay dearly for it”, and i object, i’m sup­posed to sit still for being called a racist hater.

    If i really were polit­i­cally inclined, i’d just shut my mouth and let any and all lib­er­als and pro­gres­sives just keep think­ing the 9-12 rally and tea par­ties and so on were just a fringe group of kooks all astro­turfed by FoxNews. Sure, toss me in the briar patch. The prob­lem is — i want health care reform, and cov­er­age for the unin­sur­able, and a refram­ing of inter­na­tional aims for for­eign inter­ven­tions, and a more ratio­nal national energy pol­icy to boot. So i’d really like for peo­ple like Tom Fried­man, whom i used to respect immensely, to not guz­zle the grape flavor-ade and believe that the tax­payer reac­tion isn’t com­ing.

    Ron Paul is way too iso­la­tion­ist and unre­al­is­tic for me, and Fried­man said a smart thing this week­end in such a stu­pid way no one right of Harry Reid will lis­ten to him (the energy tax on gaso­line idea). If we didn’t have the reverse racism of Michael Steele as RNC chair, stuck on stu­pid, we could work some bipar­ti­san debate on cre­at­ing some effec­tive leg­is­la­tion, but that actual piece of Repub­li­can racism isn’t likely to be pub­licly repented of any­time soon. So i’m frus­trated.

  19. Sue said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    MMJ­eff, is that “briar patch” ref­er­ence just to see who’s pay­ing atten­tion?

  20. moe99 said on September 21st, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    What “lies” about the Bush admin­is­tra­tion are we talk­ing about here, Jefft­mmo?

    I refuse to accept that asser­tion with­out proof.

    Here’s a list of Bush scan­dals and it lists almost 300 of them. But this was 2 years ago, so I would think we could add at least Gale Norton’s inves­ti­ga­tion to it….

    http://​tpm​muck​raker​.talk​ing​pointsmemo​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​4​9​51.php

  21. Deggjr said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    Not only are the birthers maroons, they are gullibulls.

  22. coozledad said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    I don’t know if these folks have really thought this one through. I’ve known a cou­ple of peo­ple who worked in an emer­gency room, and before the advent of Cock Ring Ware­house, there were a lim­ited, but sur­pris­ing num­ber of poor bas­tards who showed up tumesced with a wed­ding band stran­gling their penis. Accord­ing to the radi­ol­o­gist, it was vir­tu­ally a party, with all the hos­pi­tal employ­ees stop­ping in to have a look. It didn’t quite get as far as pos­ing for a Polaroid with the patient, but almost.
    http://​www​.talk​ing​pointsmemo​.com/​g​a​l​l​e​r​y​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​9​/​v​a​l​u​e​s​-​v​o​t​e​r​s​.​p​h​p​?​i​m​g​=​3​&​a​m​p​;​r​e​f​=fpblg

    Cock Ring Ware­house:
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​Q​b​-​K​h​1oJSGE

  23. Scout said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Jeff(tmmo) has referred to the “absolute nasty hate­ful­ness” dis­played by left lean­ers towards Bush, and I respect­fully sub­mit the fol­low­ing rea­sons for any nas­ti­ness and hatred on my part:

    1. Ignored a memo stat­ing Bin Laden to attack US; sat par­a­lyzed and read to school kids while US under attack.
    2. Used the hor­ren­dous attack as an excuse to start an unnec­ces­sary and immoral war in Iraq.
    3. Con­doned and set up loop­holes for tor­ture.
    4. Spied on ordi­nary Amer­i­can cit­i­zens, many of whom were sim­ply polit­i­cal oppo­nents (Quak­ers?!).
    5. Closed town-hall meet­ing in which loy­alty had to be estab­lished to gain entry.
    6. Allowed a crony to com­pletely mis­man­age the Kat­rina cri­sis while he, Bush, was flit­ting around mak­ing pub­lic appear­ances.
    7. Set Cli­mate Change pol­icy back for 8 years that the earth can ill afford.
    8. Gave tax cuts to the already obscenely wealthy, while spend­ing more money than all pre­vi­ous US Pres­i­dents com­bined. Now we’re sup­posed to believe the world of hurt we’re in is some­how all Obama’s fault.

    I know I’m for­get­ting stuff, but at this point, Obama’s haters sim­ply do not have the sheer vol­ume of pol­icy to pick from to be so vehe­mently upset. In my opin­ion.

  24. Sue said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Cooze:
    Bad Hos­pi­tal Employ­ees! Bad Employ­ees!
    Seri­ously, not to take any­thing away from your com­ment, but every one of those peo­ple should have been writ­ten up at min­i­mum. That’s a huge no-no in any health care set­ting, from a pro­fes­sional and legal per­spec­tive.

  25. kayak woman said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    I have the ugli­est feet on earth, bunions and all. Peo­ple are always try­ing to sym­pa­thize with me because they think my feet must hurt. Not. I walk 5-6 miles a day. Every day. In my Chaco san­dals. I add polartech socks when it starts get­ting cold. When the snow flies and the tem­per­a­ture dips below about 25, I rather reluc­tantly switch to a pair of LL Bean “win­ter ten­nis shoes” or what­ever they’re called these days.

    There is a DSW in Ann Arbor (Arbor­land) so I bet there are more through­out the Metro Daytwa area.

  26. ROgirl said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    There must be enough peo­ple out there who CAN buy shoes online to make it a prof­itable busi­ness, but for those of us who have prob­lems find­ing shoes that fit, it’s just not prac­ti­cal. I have a wide foot and high arch which that makes it a real crap­shoot at times, and I gen­er­ally don’t like the wide width styles. In the past I’ve found shoes at Nord­strom Rack, but not recently. DSW is in the area (I go to the one across from Oak­land Mall), and I’ve found a few things there too.

  27. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    http://​www​.zom​bi​etime​.com/​z​o​m​b​l​o​g​/​?p=621

    But that’s your point – Bush deserves it. No one on the left ever needed to say a word about it, because it was all fair.

    Mean­while, the “oppo­si­tion” con­tin­ues to be described en masse as “Obama’s haters.” And as crazy, loons, nutjobs, wingnuts, insane, unbal­anced, and that’s the nice stuff.

    Is there any way that “I” or any­one to the right of the spec­trum, many of whom were say­ing fairly uncom­pli­men­tary things about Bush all the way back to “com­pas­sion­ate con­ser­vatism” in regards to expand­ing the reach and cost of fed­eral gov­er­nance, can object to fur­ther growth of national ini­tia­tives with­out being called racist? It sure seems like the over­all aim is to make sure that any expos­tu­la­tion against the un-plan Plan that was so ani­mat­edly pressed on Sun­day morn­ing is put in the same loony bin as LaRouche (Demo­c­rat, last time he ran) and Oswald (Com­mu­nist, unhappy about Kennedy anti-communism), let alone the Glenn Beck and var­i­ous unhooded Klan fan­ta­sists.

  28. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    Shoes on-line are just such a crap­shoot. Three dif­fer­ent size 15s fit like any­thing from a 12 to a muk­luk for a sasquatch; at least L.L. Bean is totally mel­low about returns.

  29. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    I wouldn’t be too wor­ried about claims that you’re racist for ques­tion­ing admin­is­tra­tion posi­tions Jeff. Ignore all that. Just press on with seri­ous crit­i­cisms about the health care plan, or skep­ti­cism as there is no plan, really.

    There’s a lot of rage out there among the teabag­gers for sure, they’re afraid for their eco­nomic future. They’re look­ing for some­one to blame for their trou­bles — an enemy, a scape­goat. Not long ago some of my fel­low Michi­gan­ders, whipped up by incen­di­ary anti-government rhetoric on the radio, gath­ered in a farm­house to plan events lead­ing to the Okla­homa City bomb­ing.

    I’m frus­trated too, frus­trated with how money pol­lutes our sys­tem so per­va­sively, leg­isla­tively and judi­cially. It stinks. I’m no expert on com­par­a­tive law so I don’t know exactly how our U.S. sys­tem stacks up against oth­ers, but I doubt that it’s the best.

    Here’s an exam­ple from one of my cases. In June the Michi­gan Court of Appeals held that our Con­sumer Pro­tec­tion Act doesn’t pro­tect con­sumers deceived by non­profit cor­po­ra­tions. The court (or more likely a law clerk) pulled out a dic­tio­nary to find a def­i­n­i­tion to suit its pur­poses – a def­i­n­i­tion by which it could “rea­son” that non­profit cor­po­ra­tions, by def­i­n­i­tion, don’t engage in “trade or com­merce.” (If Blue Cross rips off a con­sumer, fah­hged­d­a­bout look­ing to the Con­sumer Pro­tec­tion Act for help.)

    It’s one thing when an indi­vid­ual like Bill Clin­ton finds an eso­teric def­i­n­i­tion from the OED to save his ass (“sex­ual rela­tions” in the Lewin­sky affair) and entirely another when the appa­ra­tus of the state does so with quiet delib­er­a­tion to affir­ma­tively harm indi­vid­ual con­sumer inter­ests vis-a-vis cor­po­rate inter­ests.

  30. brian stouder said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Jeff, I never cot­toned to the “Bush is Hitler” crowd, and in fact I still part com­pany with many (here­abouts) with regard to what our ter­ror­ist detainees deserve (to para­phrase Judge Roy Bean – a fair trial and then a hang­ing).

    In my own expe­ri­ence, many of the same folks who didn’t like the spec­ta­cle of angry peo­ple shak­ing signs with Adolf Bush on them, now heartily agree with signs like that with Obama’s vis­age on them.

    And – I don’t recall any Demo­c­rat shout­ing “YOU LIE” at the pre­vi­ous pres­i­dent, as he addressed con­gress.

    And fur­ther – recently it was flatly dis­heart­en­ing to watch my con­gress­man sit serenely as one crank after the next referred to the cur­rent pres­i­dent as a nazi or social­ist or com­mu­nist or fas­cist, or as a foreign-born usurper or an advo­cate for death-boards. Our son of a bitch con­gress mem­ber qui­etly, politely smiled through ALL of that – and only leaped up with vig­or­ous responses on the two or three occa­sions when a cit­i­zen dared to go after HIM or the GOP. THEN – he was all right­eous indig­na­tion!

    See – as you know from lead­ing cam­pouts, if the adults in the tent don’t assert them­selves, then God only knows what the adven­tur­ous campers will say or do. To me, that’s the point. We’ll always have cranks, but if the main stream doesn’t “call them out” – then they BECOME the “main­stream”

  31. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Rana, it’s because I have weird feet I have bet­ter luck online. I can enter the size, width, heel height, every­thing, and Zap­pos sorts out what would work for me. I’ve had great luck with a brand called J-41, which while comfy is also quirky look­ing enough to allow me to not feel 100 years old. I get the shoes in one day, and if they don’t work, I drop them off at the UPS place or FedEx and get my credit imme­di­ately.

  32. Scout said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    Jeff(tmmo), yes Bush deserved it and it this point I main­tain that Obama does not. That could change. Right now the birthers, the deathers, the anti every­thing Obama says and does (includ­ing condi­ment choices) fac­tions of the Repub­li­can party are the ones mak­ing all the noise and get­ting all the atten­tion. They are a col­lec­tive Boy Who Cried Wolf at this point and I am hard pressed to see how any­one can blame most Amer­i­cans for not draw­ing equiv­a­lence to what went on from 2001-2008.

  33. Dexter said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    Bill Granger , who wrote a great col­umn for the ChiTrib for many years (and is now dis­abled and in an Old Sailors home) wrote of many com­mon things, like pickup trucks, cans of beer, and Irish Break­fast Tea. I tried those teas and loved them, but now I drink Stash brands mostly, usu­ally Earl Grey. I start every day with about 2/3 of a pot of cof­fee, though, and tea is for the evening and TV time.
    I got a very nice birth­day gift in the mail, and I am going out in search of a be-bop con­cert to break out—I got the coolest hat ever…a leather porkpie, from my daugh­ter. It is awe­some!
    http://​www​.mikethe​hat​ter​.com/​I​t​e​m​S​e​a​r​c​h​.​a​s​p​?​S​t​y​l​e​I​D​=​4​&​a​m​p​;​B​randID=

  34. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Mock­ing those who got wrought up over Obama’s choice of mus­tard – absolutely, that was just pathetic. (And kind of funny, about them.)

    The role of money — this is what stymies me from pick­ing a party qua party. Cen­tral­iz­ing more con­trol and author­ity seems like a good way to just put more influ­ence ped­dling in the DC ball­park, but broader struc­tures also lets big cor­po­ra­tions carry exces­sive weight in pick­ing off oppo­si­tion piece­meal with manip­u­la­tive pr and mar­ket­ing. It is why i’d like to see more social pro­grams truly oper­ate at the state level, where you can exper­i­ment, lobby back in a really grass­roots way, and learn from sim­i­lar states in other parts of the coun­try. I’m tempted to argue that let­ting health insur­ance plans com­pete across state bound­aries would help con­trol costs, but then you need a multi-state, if not national panel to nego­ti­ate for fees/prices with providers . . . so why not go whole hog?

    Which takes me back to the French plan (national pol­icy, pri­vate insur­ers, close reg­u­la­tion); but unlike online shoe pur­chases, we can’t send this one back if it pinches our feet worse than the shoes that are wear­ing out on us right now.

  35. Dexter said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:51 pm

  36. Julie Robinson said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    For me the place between stil­letos and Hush Pup­pies is Birken­stock. I share fit­ting prob­lems with every­one above and add the com­pli­ca­tion of plan­tar fasci­itis, so I have to have a sup­port­ive footbed. Are they ugly? Who cares–trust me, when my feet hurt I’m not pleas­ant to be around. The one store that car­ries them locally only gets a few styles in each year. Appar­ently they haven’t heard about the magic of the inter­nets.

    Cof­fee smells won­der­ful but makes the tummy roil, so I stick to tea and pop for my caf­feine. Can’t drink any after mid-day or I don’t sleep.

    Nancy, my father kept a sim­i­lar sched­ule to you, often cov­er­ing meet­ings or games late at night but still doing his early shift on the news desk at the radio sta­tion. Amaz­ingly I never saw him use any caffeine–maybe all those cig­a­rettes gave him energy? He was also an early mas­ter of the power nap and could fall asleep any­where. And fre­quently did.

  37. coozledad said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Sue: This was in the late sev­en­ties and early eight­ies, and most of this par­tic­u­lar hospital’s employ­ees were coked to the gills, espe­cially the Fri­day night through Sun­day night­mare shifts. A few years and over­doses later, I think there were some more strin­gent dis­ci­pli­nary mea­sures under­taken.
    My friends did get writ­ten up about a few things, notably, nearly dri­ving a portable x-ray unit through a fourth floor hall win­dow of the oncol­ogy hos­pi­tal.

  38. Dorothy said on September 21st, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Don’t for­get to set your DVR – the Prez is on Let­ter­man tonight!

  39. Scout said on September 21st, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Jeff(tmmo), you know, we really do agree on many things. Money does poi­son pol­i­tics. I guess we’ll need to agree to dis­agree about any pres­i­den­tial merit Mr. Bush may have had. I will com­mend him on his grace­ful and quiet exit from office. That was well done.

  40. Danny said on September 21st, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    I’m with Rana and who­ever else says they don’t order “tall.” Actu­ally, I rarely hit Star­bucks in San Diego because we brew our own Jose’s Vanilla Nut from Costco at home and I take a ther­mos to work (some­times feel like Fred Flint­stone).

    Brian, more than a few years back I was using one of the bath­room stalls in a Barnes and Nobel. Some teenagers walked in, did their busi­ness and then turned the lights out on me on the way out, gig­gling all the way. Need­less to say, I had to be care­ful about the “paper­work” in the dark.

    When I got out of the bath­room, I looked around for any­one with sly grins and furtive glances, but to no avail. It was kind of funny though.

  41. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    The biggest dif­fer­ence I dis­cern between the rage directed at Bush and Obama is where the anger is derived.

    The Bush Admin­is­tra­tion dis­graced our nation in many pal­pa­ble ways from gin­ning up a war with Iraq to sus­pend­ing habeas cor­pus to tor­tur­ing ter­ror sus­pects. It politi­cized EVERYTHING or has the image of W. on the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abra­ham Lin­coln declar­ing the end of major com­bat oper­a­tions slipped our minds? After the deba­cle of Hur­ri­cane Kat­rina, the nation finally began to see through the smoke and mir­rors of Karl Rove to real­ize this was a cor­rupt and incom­pe­tent group of peo­ple.

    With Obama, the fury is based more on what peo­ple think he MIGHT do and on the very nature of who he is. I am not call­ing all those who dis­like the O-man racists, though there is a sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of crack­ers amongst the tea partiers. But the melange of signs and slo­gans on dis­play focused very lit­tle on any pro­posed leg­is­la­tion.

    Obama has been in office since Jan­u­ary. He inher­ited two wars, the worst eco­nomic sit­u­a­tion since the Great Depres­sion, a politi­cized Jus­tice Depart­ment, a for­eign pol­icy built on noth­ing but sneers and fists and scores of other sig­ni­cant issues. I’d give him a C or a C-plus at best, so far, but man, it has been only eight months. What exactly has he DONE, as opposed to what he has pro­posed, that is gen­er­at­ing this kind of ire?

  42. Deborah said on September 21st, 2009 at 2:45 pm

    I was in your neck of the woods this week­end, Nancy. I got a last minute seat to tour Cran­brook with my hus­band and his archi­tec­ture stu­dents from IIT. It was a glo­ri­ous week­end there, at least till late Sat­ur­day after­noon when we left for Chicago. Cran­brook is beau­ti­ful by the way, have you ever been there?

    Regard­ing shoes: before my Fin­land trip I looked high and low for brown, flat, ankle boots to wear with jeans. They had to be brown because every other pair of shoes I own is black, I wanted some­thing dif­fer­ent and I had bought a cou­ple of pairs of wheat col­ored jeans. I never found any until I got back, of course. They are every­where now.

  43. Sue said on September 21st, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    Brian Stouder, you get a big gold star and a hug for that calm and thought­ful com­ment. That last para­graph was per­fect.

  44. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 2:52 pm

    I promise to drop it after this — brother Jeff, if you get a wider view of the posters car­ried on 9-12, they were much more about rein­ing in the expan­sion of gov­ern­ment than they were about Obama, and like Ron Paul, most of them have cried foul at NCLB, adding enti­tle­ments to the Medicare pro­gram with­out bud­getary sup­port, and no small per­cent­age of them have polled “get out” on Iraq for years. Look at the stats, those poll num­bers included a fair num­ber of Repub­li­cans, let alone inde­pen­dents. When you say all the tea party/9-12 pro­test­ers are scream­ing about Obama, you’re drink­ing the wrong bev­er­age. Put down the pur­ple stuff and have some Earl Grey. Yes, there are hate­ful loons (and, GOP­ers are gonna take swipes at a Demo­c­ra­tic pres­i­dent), but there’s a large and grow­ing reac­tion against expand­ing gov­ern­ment, and it goes back well into Bush’s terms. McCain lost in large part because those folks weren’t con­vinced he wasn’t a me-too in the Bush vein, and they said “what the heck, let’s see what Obama actu­ally does.” Now, like my dad, they’re (ridicu­lously) say­ing “Whaaaaa?” to the pol­icy ini­tia­tives com­ing out, but it really isn’t about the guy.

    And the Obama as Hitler posters are almost every last one from LaRouch­ies. You can look it up. Thank­fully, they really are a small but inde­fati­ga­ble lit­tle group that won’t run out of money, dang it. Nei­ther party is aided by their “the Queen is a drug dealer” clap­trap, let alone demo­niz­ing Obama as a fas­cist.

    Hey, what about that foot injury on “Mad Men”? WHOAAAA . . . that’s gonna leave a mark.

    ps – ditto on Brian’s cam­pout metaphor. Truly.

  45. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 3:04 pm

    Jeff TMMO, your point about fed­eral ver­sus state leg­is­la­tion is inter­est­ing. State gov­ern­ments may be more respon­sive to peo­ple and less prone to cor­rupt­ing influ­ence. That was a stan­dard “states rights” argu­ment advanced by con­ser­v­a­tives on Rehnquist’s Supreme Court. They struck down fed­eral leg­is­la­tion (typ­i­cally lib­eral) so that state leg­is­la­tion (typ­i­cally con­ser­v­a­tive) would be per­mit­ted and spoke of the ben­e­fits of states exper­i­ment­ing in the “caul­dron” (my word) of free enter­prise. It’s an inter­est­ing idea. It plays into heart­landers’ skep­ti­cism about the Belt­way crowd too. It mor­phed into the canard that the fed­eral gov­ern­ment gets every­thing wrong. But I won­der about whether local gov­ern­ment is any less cor­rupt­ible than fed­eral gov­ern­ment. Local politi­cians, includ­ing judges, are more acces­si­ble to local cor­rupt­ing influ­ences from my van­tage point. Corruption’s not just a Wash­ing­ton thing.

  46. ROgirl said on September 21st, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    Brian, I think the cyn­i­cism that Rove unleashed is still play­ing out. Even peo­ple who sup­ported Bush for a long time came to the real­iza­tion that they’d been played, but the atmos­phere has been poi­soned by the Bush tac­tic of play­ing only to its sup­port­ers and ignor­ing every­one else, and that’s what I think a lot of the vit­riol is about (in addi­tion to other fac­tors like racism and dis­tance from real­ity). They think that’s how Obama is deal­ing with them and their con­cerns.

  47. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 3:27 pm

    I watched a slide show of the Value Vot­ers Sum­mit over at Talk­ing Points Memo and was struck by some­thing. In the 25 pho­tos included, there is only one per­son of color and it is some­one stand­ing in front of a booth. Every speaker pho­tographed is white and with the excep­tion of Michelle Bach­mann and our favorite beauty pageant con­tes­tant, Car­rie Pre­jean, all are male.

    Per­haps this is a skewed photo essay. Per­haps there were His­panic and/or black speak­ers who were not included. But if this was the lineup, it was awfully pale con­sid­er­ing how diverse this nation has become.

  48. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    I’d say both, Jeff; there were many minor­ity speak­ers on the 9-12 plat­form, but there was what should be a dis­turbingly small num­ber of pro­test­ers out on the Mall from all i’ve heard (and that’s from happy-to-be-there peo­ple). David Brooks’ col­umn con­firmed that.

    It’s like when i try to say to my evan­gel­i­cal col­leagues, “Does it bother you at all that pic­tures of your annual gathering/meeting/assembly are all mid­dle aged, paunchy, bald­ing white guys, where diver­sity is a few men with beards among the clean-shavenness?” And their reac­tion is “Jeff, you’re get­ting all multi-culti on us!”

    Nope, i’m a demo­graphic real­ist: if you aren’t reach­ing minor­ity audi­ences, you’re only reach­ing a declin­ing per­cent­age of the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion. That’s evan­ge­lism how, again? (From my twit­ter feed ear­lier today, in fact — RT @EssentialChurch From 1990-2004 the US pop­u­la­tion grew by more than 18% and the num­ber of peo­ple attend­ing church declined by 3%.)

    But seri­ously, was any­one jolted up out of the sofa by the foot-mangle last night, or did you actu­ally all stick with the Emmys instead of watch­ing “Mad Men”?

  49. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    JeffT­MMO,

    As always, you are gra­cious in your response. I am not drink­ing the Obama-Ade. As noted, I am dis­ap­pointed in many areas includ­ing his lack of “oomph” in push­ing health care reform until all this back­lash had built itself into a tsunami.

    My point was sim­ply that Bush actu­ally did things that drove the protests against him. I am not sure what it is Obama has done that has led to all these denun­ci­a­tions. If these pro­test­ers are so fired up about gov­ern­ment intru­sion into their lives, where were they when the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion decided it didn’t need court approval to read our e-mails or lis­ten in to our phone con­ver­sa­tions? Where were they when the pres­i­dent gave him­self power to declare any­one, any­where at any time an “enemy com­bat­ant,” sub­ject to jail­ing in seclu­sion with no rights to coun­sel? Where were they when the Con­gress was stick­ing its nose into the Terri Schi­avo affair?

    To me, these are con­crete exam­ples of a gov­ern­ment very much intrud­ing into our lives, but there wasn’t a peep on the right. Now, all of a sud­den, they are upset and engaged. Why now??

  50. basset said on September 21st, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    We’re going to the Zap­pos ware­house store this Sat­ur­day… on the way to visit some friends who live near there. the ware­house is enor­mous, some­thing like a mil­lion square feet off I-65 on the south­ern fringes of Louisville.

    call up a satel­lite map of Shep­herdsville, Ken­tucky, and look on the east side of the inter­state.

    first time we went there I pulled off the high­way and asked for direc­tions…

    “you can’t miss it.”

    “I more than likely can, tell me again.”

    “No, you don’t under­stand. You REALLY can’t miss it.”

  51. Jean S said on September 21st, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    Shoes. Pol­i­tics. Pol­i­tics. Shoes.

    I vote for shoes.

    Nance, did you see the NYTimes’ piece on news from Detroit? Looks like we’ll be swamped with cover sto­ries, “human inter­est” pieces, etc. in the months to come.

  52. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    Okay, I’ll play.

    My most recent shoe pur­chase was a beau­ti­ful pair of brown and white spec­ta­tors, which I wore when teach­ing last Fri­day to the amuse­ment of my much, much, much younger stu­dents. They are com­fort­able and very cool look­ing and were pur­chased online because I have been unable to find any spec­ta­tors in the scores of shoe stores vis­ited here in Chicago.

  53. Danny said on September 21st, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    …well there is also the lights off/on in the bath­room topic. Not a very com­pelling day, eh?

  54. Sue said on September 21st, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    MMJ­eff needs to explain the foot-mangle. Would that be com­pelling? Noth­ing but sports on my tv yes­ter­day, all day. I didn’t even know the Emmys were on. Good to see Bryan Cranston won again.

  55. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    I can’t deny watch­ing most of the Bears vs. Steel­ers game while slog­ging through one of my new text­books yes­ter­day. (Sheesh. More than 35 years later and I’m still study­ing like I did as an under­grad­u­ate with either TV or radio on in back­ground.) It was a fun game, but if the Steel­ers kicker hits those two field goals, it’s another L for the Mon­sters of the Mid­way.

    I’m always a lit­tle torn when watch­ing the NFL. I do enjoy the games, but the super vio­lent hits that are deliv­ered these days are just amaz­ing. One pro QB has pre­dicted we are get­ting close to the day when some­one will be killed on the foot­ball field in one of these huge col­li­sions. And I’m old enough to remem­ber the hit Jack Tatum deliv­ered to Daryl Stin­g­ley many years ago, which left Stin­g­ley par­a­lyzed below the neck.

    Any­one else out there feel the same way? Admi­ra­tion for the ath­leti­cism, strength and skill, but fear for what those crush­ing hits are doing to both the hit­ter and the hit­tee? Man, no won­der the aver­age NFL career is 3.5 years.

  56. Jenine said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    The kick in Morn­ing Thun­der is from yerba mate. The Wikipedia descrip­tion spec­i­fies that it “con­tains caf­feine and has a pun­gent taste like a cross between green tea and cof­fee, with hints of tobacco and oak”. One of my husband’s favorite nov­els, Hop­scotch by Julio Cor­tazar, includes many mopey Argen­tini­ans dis­cussing the mean­ings of life and art while smok­ing many cig­a­rettes and drink­ing lots of mate.

  57. Danny said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    Yeah, I heard that too, Jeff. One solu­tion is to remove the face guards. I’d also like to see them imple­ment very strin­gent test­ing for per­for­mance enhanc­ing drugs.

  58. Sue said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:21 pm

    Jeff Bor­den, this was recently in Sports Illus­trated. I have trou­ble see­ing this as a “happy end­ing”, but I know I’m in the minor­ity. What’s with a sport that leaves men crip­pled to var­i­ous degrees by the time they’re forty, kills kids who are forced to prac­tice in August heat or get kicked off the team, or leaves 13-year-olds par­a­lyzed? I do think that’s tak­ing “win or die try­ing” a lit­tle too far.
    http://​sport​sil​lus​trated​.cnn​.com/​v​a​u​l​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​m​a​g​a​z​i​n​e​/​M​A​G​1​1​5​9​2​4​3​/​i​n​d​ex.htm

  59. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:36 pm

    I’ll play too. We were in Province­town MA on vaca­tion a few weeks ago. My wife went into a store to shop. As I waited out­side a gay male looked fetch­ingly at me while slowly twirling his index fin­ger in a cir­cu­lar motion on the hair south of his navel. He was wear­ing styl­ish sneak­ers. My wife emerged from the store with a box con­tain­ing an iden­ti­cal styl­ish sneak­ers — see pic
    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.kaboodle.com/hi/img/a/0/0/8/1/AAAACsyHxrkAAAAAAAgbiQ.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.kaboodle.com/reviews/converse-rummage-all-star&usg=__e9dOKDfyUa5LDdsmuVXmlxRbm-Q=&h=240&w=160&sz=11&hl=en&start=3&tbnid=ZpBP4YssG_y4oM:&tbnh=110&tbnw=73&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlaceless%2Bconverse%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den

  60. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    I’m get­ting lots of com­pli­ments on them.

  61. Rana said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:38 pm

    LAMary, I think you meant to respond to ROgirl?

    Any­way, I’m a fan of both Zap­pos and Birken­stocks, and I shall look into the J-41s. I was a bit leery of them, because they resem­ble Keens, and I have dis­cov­ered to my dis­may that Keens’ sole bumps just do not work with my feet. Privos, by Clark, are also nice; what I appre­ci­ate is that they are both low and cushy, and the straps are stretchy. I like clogs, but they’re some­thing I’m reluc­tant to buy online because of the high arch thing; I’ve got too many veins on the top to enjoy shoes that are tight there. Adjustable straps across the arch are essen­tial.

    My only dis­ap­point­ment with Zap­pos is that they don’t always have what I want, and way too many tren­doid shoes that scare me and my feet. But then, I’m pretty damn picky.

    My caf­feinated bev­er­age of choice is either Japan­ese green tea (which tastes nutty, unlike Chi­nese green tea, which tastes grassy) or black tea with milk and sugar. But the effect of the caf­feine is mostly to ease with­drawal headaches. Unless I’ve been com­pletely off it for a while, in which case my reac­tion is strong enough to trig­ger panic attacks, it doesn’t seem to have much effect except on my blad­der. I can drink a full mug of strong black tea just before bed and fall asleep with no prob­lems.

  62. Rana said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    del, those are cool. Did you get the red ones?

  63. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    And I agree about pro foot­ball. Way too vio­lent. I admit I watch col­lege ball though.

  64. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:40 pm

    No. Mine are lace­less brown­ies.

  65. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Sue,

    What a sad story in SI. And how poignant that the first thing the kid asks the doc­tors is whether he’ll ever be able to play again?

    I don’t believe in blam­ing the mes­sen­ger, but the col­lec­tion of clips of “great hits” that are a sta­ple of ESPN and the other sports chan­nels makes me won­der if some of these guys aren’t angling to be fea­tured in one of these seg­ments by deliv­er­ing the most vicious hit pos­si­ble.

  66. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Con­verse All Stars are pretty stan­dard footwear around here for both gen­ders. I’ve got them in green and black. The off­spring have white, blue and black. I’ve been eye­ing some pur­ple ones. The Famous Foot store, which used to be Famous Footwear but the wear part of the sign burned out, has buy one get 1/2 of the sec­ond pair deals all the time, so they work out to about 34 bucks a pair.

  67. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Rana, you’re right. I did mean ROgirl.

  68. brian stouder said on September 21st, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    Off topic – but here’s a CULTURAL ALERT for Alex and Julie and any other Fort Wayne/Allen County per­son:

    When Shelby (our 11 year old daugh­ter) and I attended the kick­off event for the 2009-10 Omnibus Lec­ture Series at IPFW (an excel­lent pre­sen­ta­tion by Henry Win­kler and Mar­lee Matlin, which was par­tic­u­larly well-suited for Shelby), she noticed Harold Holzer’s face on one of the video screens as we were enter­ing the audi­to­rium.

    So we stopped and watched until the image came up again (she had a par­tic­u­larly high opin­ion of him, from the times we have met him at the late Fort Wayne Lin­coln Museum) and learned that he is giv­ing a lec­ture titled “The Edu­ca­tion of Abra­ham Lin­coln” at IPFW. I went search­ing on Holzer’s web­site, and found noth­ing at all, but on IPFW’s cal­en­dar, under The Mike Downs Cen­ter for Indi­ana Pol­i­tics, we found the announce­ment about “Harold Holzer, Lin­coln author/scholar and co-chair of the United States Lin­coln Bicen­ten­nial Com­mis­sion” sched­uled to deliver a lec­ture and talk about Abra­ham Lin­coln, at the beau­ti­ful Rhine­hart Music Cen­ter; Rhine­hart Recital Hall.

    But here’s the kicker:

    IT’S COMING UP IN JUST 10 DAYS!! – on Octo­ber 1!

    The doors open at 7 pm, the pub­lic is wel­come, and there is no charge. I sus­pect LOTS of peo­ple would attend, if they know that it’s com­ing; but – as for me – I’d have NO IDEA it was occur­ring if Shelby hadn’t spot­ted him on a video screen at the Auer Audi­to­rium.

    Be there or be square, I say!!

  69. MarkH said on September 21st, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    Jeff Bor­den, your post #55 hits home in a num­ber of areas. That “someone’s going to die” remark was made by Cincinnati’s Car­son Palmer and reported by Nancy’s old J-school class­mate, Peter King in SI a few days ago. King said it just flat stopped the con­ver­sa­tion among him and other QB’s, sug­gest­ing that the notion has been the ele­phant in the room for some time now. Play­ers are get­ting larger and larger and hit­ting harder and such an event is just inevitable, they admit­ted.

    I always had this notion about Jack Tatum: that he was this fig­ure that came out of nowhere, emerged from the dark shad­ows, if you will. That he never went to school, that Woody Hayes found him down the street in the Ohio State Pen­i­ten­tiary and some­how deter­mined that he was a gifted ath­lete. How con­ve­nient that he was also a killer. Hid his entire past from the NCAA and school offi­cials, or just con­cocted a high school his­tory. No one knew his real back­ground. I know this story isn’t true (I think), but Tatum was bru­tal; qui­etly lethal. Never said a word, just went out and destroyed the oppos­ing player. He had many such inci­dents, Stingley’s was just the most notable, and the worst. How could you get that way with­out some kind of crim­i­nal back­ground, I won­dered.

    My first year of high school foot­ball, Fall of ’67 in Cincin­nati, we had a pre­sea­son scrim­mage with Mt. Healthy. As the 2nd period started, we wit­nessd one of the oppos­ing defen­sive backs go into a seizure, as he was on the field. Stag­ger­ing, grab­bing his hel­met in des­per­a­tion, falling down, writhing a bit, then, still. Still, because he was dead; just like that. We were all frozen as all the coaches ran over and with our trainer, an EMT, worked furi­ously to revive him. No avail. Ten min­utes into this, our fine drill sergeant of a coach and a ter­rific math teacher, Jack Orri­son, came over to us, drained, ashen. “Go shake hands and get on the bus, boys, it’s over”. Very emo­tional, a tough thing for 15-year old sopho­more, and every­one else to wit­ness. Still clear in the mind 42 years later.

    That Steel­ers kicker is in the crosshairs this week, you can be sure. I know this is a team sport, and everey­one has to take respon­si­bil­ity for a loss, yada, yada. But it’s also true that each player is told, just do YOUR job. If ebery­one does that, together we’ll come out on top. When it mat­tered, he missed two rel­a­tively easy shots, when it mat­tered most. So that’s his loss, the way I see it.

    Danny, could you explain remov­ing the face­guards? That helps…what?

  70. Laurie said on September 21st, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    Re caf­feine, I’ve been going to a doctor’s office that puts out all kinds of Celes­tial Sea­son­ings prod­ucts (some newer than oth­ers), and I saw one I hadn’t seen before- Verde Peach Mist Maté (i.e., yerba maté). The box claimed it gets you going “with­out the cof­fee jit­ters,” and blath­ered on about its cul­tural his­tory in South Amer­ica. I tried it, and indeed it was a pleas­ant, mild rev-up. Sadly, it’s been dis­con­tin­ued (put that box on E-Bay!). I think the only maté prod­uct CS now makes is Morn­ing Thun­der. On their caffeine-o-meter, drip cof­fee is 90, Eng­lish Break­fast is 60, MT is 40, and decaf cof­fee is 5.
    The things that strike me about tea now are “well­ness” (for the nation of the Wor­ried Well); peo­ple turn­ing to small com­forts they can con­trol, when they have no con­trol of many big things; and the high prices on those cute lit­tle boxes. I love the way they hide the family-size boxes of Lip­ton and Red Rose (remem­ber the chimp jazz band?) on the bot­tom shelves.
    I keep a box of No-Doz around for emer­gen­cies, but its side effects are jan­gly and unpleas­ant (as am I if I take it). My stom­ach can’t take cof­fee, and I think reg­u­lar tea is part of my DNA now, as it doesn’t have much effect.
    I have read inter­est­ing sci­ence about the ben­e­fi­cial effects of reg­u­lar prac­tice of med­i­ta­tion on alert­ness, atten­tion, and sleep.

  71. Danny said on September 21st, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    Mark, I heard it in an inter­view with a retired QB (maybe Joe Mon­tana, I for­get). He said that it would reduce the vio­lence of hits, but he did not elab­o­rate on if he was talk­ing about hel­met hits or just any hit where a guy might also have to worry about inci­den­tal or sec­ondary face con­tact. Prob­a­bly reduc­ing pads all around would be good too.

  72. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    MarkH,

    Thanks for attribut­ing that quote to Car­son Palmer. I just couldn’t remem­ber the source.

    It’s hard to see what can be done to pre­vent these griev­ous injuries. Beyond the stu­pid machismo that dom­i­nates so many play­ers –what line­backer was it who said after rules to pro­tect the quar­ter­back were insti­tuted sneered, “Why don’t they just dress in skirts?”– we fans eat it up and the league knows it.

    I sup­pose at some point there could be rules about weight, but who is going to pro­pose them? And it’s not all about size. The Pitts­burgh defender who rang Chicago tight end Greg Olsen’s bell yes­ter­day with a vicious but legal hit was one of the smaller guys on the team.

    I feel for your expe­ri­ence, man. I totally under­stand why you recall it with such clar­ity decades later.

    Yes, there are no guar­an­tees in life. But when you are send­ing a fast-moving, 300-pound line­backer directly at a fast-moving, 275-pound run­ning back com­ing in the oppo­site direc­tion, you are cre­at­ing a car crash with humans instead of crash test dum­mies.

  73. LAMary said on September 21st, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    There are lots of Mate’ teas on the mar­ket. TJ’s def­i­nitely has some.

  74. Kirk said on September 21st, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    Any of you guys see Jack Tatum on the side­line dur­ing the Ohio State-Navy game (or, as Del says, maybe it was the USC game)? Doesn’t look so much like an assas­sin now; he more resem­bles an aging Ras­ta­man.

    http://​www​.amazin​gau​to​graph​s4all​.com/​s​k​i​n​1​/​i​m​a​g​e​s​/​s​i​g​n​i​n​g​_​i​m​a​g​e​s​/​j​a​c​k​_​t​a​t​um.JPG

  75. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 7:09 pm

    Foot­ball, shoes, and more pol­i­tics. The Repub­li­cans are fight­ing rules of net neu­tral­ity.

    http://​voices​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​p​o​s​t​t​e​c​h​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​9​/​s​e​n​a​t​e​_​r​e​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​n​s​_​t​o​_​p​u​s​h​_​a​g​a.html

    Dis­grace­ful. No other way to put it.

    Back to foot­ball. Get­ting rid of face­masks and pads would make the play­ers more self-regulating when it comes to con­tact.

    And Jack Tatum. He was at the OSU-USC game get­ting some TV face­time. Years ago he “wrote” a book titled, “They Call Me Assas­sin,” as I recall. A photo inside was cap­tioned “the awe­some upper torso of Jack Tatum.”

  76. del said on September 21st, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    You’re prob­a­bly right Kirk. Very Ras­ta­man, Tatum was.

  77. basset said on September 21st, 2009 at 7:16 pm

    Rugby and Aus­tralian foot­ball play with­out pads, any­one know what the injury lev­els might be there? Do those leagues have the same issues with performance-enhancing drugs?

    Seems to me the best way to reduce foot­ball injuries is – no way in hell will this hap­pen – make the game less impor­tant. No mas­sive col­lege pro­grams, no huge pro salaries, less incen­tive to get all steroided up and stretch the lim­its of human phys­i­ol­ogy.

    Tea and stay­ing awake… Hubert Humphrey’s lit­tle pick-me-up, at least the way I heard it, was a hand­ful, fifty or so, of One-A-Day vit­a­mins washed down with a shot of bour­bon.

  78. Jeff Borden said on September 21st, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    I know rugby and Aussie foot­ballers make great sport of Amer­i­can foot­ball and all its pro­tec­tive gear. Rugby is a tough sport –when I was in col­lege a pop­u­lar bumper stick was “Give Blood. Play Rugby”– but I think you’re talk­ing mostly bro­ken noses, arms and teeth, not life-threatening or alter­ing major injuries. At Kent State, rugby was a club sport, so after a game was over, the teams would drain a few kegs of beer and hang out together, no doubt com­par­ing bruises, scars and miss­ing incisors.

  79. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    Obvi­ously, no one watched “Mad Men” last night. Maybe tonight at 10 pm, eh?

    I buy my shoes at sport­ing goods stores that sell kayak cov­ers, and wear LL Bean duck shoes as much of the year as i can get away with.

    (Spoiler-ishy: We did get the Con­rad Hilton bit con­firmed.)

  80. jcburns

    jcburns said on September 21st, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    Bought shoes late last night. Shopped a bunch of places, includ­ing Zap­pos, but ended up with AZ Shoe​.com, who checked me out with my Ama­zon cre­den­tials. Con­fus­ing, since didn’t Ama­zon just buy…? Yeah. Any­way, they had the bet­ter price by $20 for these fine New Bal­ance walk­ing thin­gies, which will be deliv­ered to the Upper Penin­sula in 10 days or so, because that’s where I’ll be.

  81. MarkH said on September 21st, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    Danny, that’s what I thought you meant, that know­ing the expo­sure of the other player, one will try to reduce the vio­lence of the hits. Too late for that, I think. The fury, it weems, is pro­grammed to just get greater.

  82. Deborah said on September 21st, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    Does Mad Men come on tonight too? I missed it last night. Unfor­tu­nately I’m still at work crank­ing out a pro­posal, but I can tell my hus­band relax­ing at home, that he can catch it tonight if that’s true???

  83. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    AMC was re-showing on Mon­days at 10 & 11 pm, but they appear to have stopped. Sorry! My bad.

  84. Rana said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    del, it’s inter­est­ing that they’re think­ing about the ways that over-protection encour­ages play­ers to dam­age them­selves and oth­ers – it’s a sim­i­lar sort of think­ing that’s behind those weird Vibram shoes I bought. The idea is that run­ners (and oth­ers) are dam­aged by over-protective footwear, both because it weak­ens the mus­cles needed to sup­port the body, and because such footwear makes it hard to receive feed­back that tells you when you’re on the verge of injur­ing your­self.

  85. Joe Kobiela said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    Myself and brother Dave, who chimes in here on occa­sion both played foot­ball in col­lege. Myself at St Joe’s in Rennsalear and Dave at Hills­dale. Yep The left lean­ing bro is a Hills­dale Grad. Dave also played Col­lege Lacrosse,we both played Rugby. I was prob­a­bly hit harder play­ing rugby than foot­ball but never really hurt. Rugby has no block­ing and tack­les are made between the shoul­ders and knees. This tends to keep injury’s to a min­i­mum. Mostly bruises and scrapes. Foot­ball is a very vio­lent game and I can­not see how you can make it less. Check out some old video from the 50-60 years, those dudes were down right nasty. Tatums hit was legal, it was a fluke that Daryle was hurt. Iam guess­ing that if you would poll ex play­ers, very few would not do it all over again.
    Per­hapse brother Dave can chime in on this.
    Pilot Joe
    If you get a chance, stop over at Ken Levine .com and read his take on state fairs. Funny stuff.

  86. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 21st, 2009 at 10:53 pm

    Never put your head down — face­mask into the pads. It’s point­ing the top of your hel­met into some­one that gets *you* hurt.

    The whole “per­for­mance enhanc­ing drugs” thing is a real head-scratcher for any of us who think occa­sion­ally that we should con­sider end­ing the “war on drugs”, because what would hap­pen if you just lost all drug test­ing for com­peti­tors? You’d have a huge spike of early deaths risked for short term gain, and then a big chunk of later in life down­sides. Some­how the eco­nomic rea­son­ing gets thrown out of whack, and like the “free­dom” to go with­out motor­cy­cle hel­mets, you get a few hun­dred new nurs­ing home patients who are drool­ing veg­eta­bles with young healthy hearts that last for forty and more years. Some­how the cost has to be re-presented up front.

  87. joodyb said on September 21st, 2009 at 11:34 pm

    Jeff tmmo, I saw it. I couldn’t quite believe my eyes. the whole show was dis­turbingly detached. the busi­ness with Sally and the baby espe­cially so. i await some Hitch­cock­ian acting-out on her part.

    i won­dered if there was some basis in fact for the John Deere acci­dent. as we say in the news­room, you can’t make that shit up.

    ((thanks to the boss or maybe his truly bril­liant assis­tant, we too have the Keurig cof­fee machine in the break room, which is right next to me. it seems (as we are an MNG prop­erty and uber fru­gal) eco­nom­i­cal and smells deli­cious. i can’t make myself try it. my brew of choice: i buy Star­bucks Komodo Dragon by the pound, have them grind it for espresso and then i straight-drip it with a gen­er­ous dash of Viet­namese cin­na­mon in a Chemex cof­fee maker.))

  88. crazycatlady said on September 22nd, 2009 at 12:53 am

    Regard­ing ‘Morn­ing Paper’ bath­room vis­its: Some teas have not only caf­feine but some con­tain sig­nif­i­cant fiber. The two together act as a peri­s­tolic stim­u­lant, which can cause an urgent call from nature. Tim­ing is every­thing!! As for me, I love tea. I espe­cially love Chai. I have lots of dif­fer­ent brands, some with or with­out caf­feine. I like cof­fee, but at home I pre­fer tea–it soothes and relaxes.

  89. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 22nd, 2009 at 7:57 am

    Yikes. “Post-journalistic” makes post-modern sound tidy and coher­ent.