nancynall.com » Going down swinging.

Going down swinging.

I have to say some­thing about Henry Allen, a jour­nal­ism story that’s mostly stay­ing in jour­nal­ism cir­cles and prob­a­bly that’s where it belongs, because it has no greater import or any­thing. I men­tion it mainly because I always wanted to work for or with Allen, a leg­endary writer and edi­tor at the Wash­ing­ton Post, whose career ended abruptly last Fri­day when he scuf­fled with a writer who was chap­ping his ass. He lit­er­ally went down swing­ing, and while I can’t con­done punch­ing one’s col­leagues, I can cer­tainly under­stand the urge to do so, and given that no one was hurt, let’s chalk it up to a final glimpse at a cer­tain Front Page stan­dard of news­room behav­ior and leave it at that.

I first encoun­tered Allen, then a super­star of the Style sec­tion, when I took a two-day writ­ing work­shop very early in my career. It was a strange trip — a hot week­end in late May. My salad-days starter car didn’t have air-conditioning, and I drove from Colum­bus to Cham­paign, Ill. with the win­dows down, wear­ing a pair of bib over­alls with a bikini top for max­i­mum air cir­cu­la­tion. It was a long trip, and I arrived wind­blown and look­ing crazy, at least if I’m to judge from the looks the desk clerk at the hotel gave me. Things went fur­ther down­hill when I real­ized I’d packed all my career clothes but not my career shoes, and had to attend the work­shop and net­work­ing ses­sions in jeans and a T-shirt. A few of the young reporters stayed up late the first night, drink­ing wine in the court­yard of the hotel, asked by man­age­ment sev­eral times to keep it down. (“It’s that girl with the over­alls and bikini,” some­one undoubt­edly said.)

Allen’s sem­i­nar was the fol­low­ing day, and what I mainly remem­ber about it was that I fell in love. He quoted a col­league at the Post: “I want to write sto­ries peo­ple can dance to,” and I got it imme­di­ately. The guy next to me didn’t — I could tell by the look on his face — but I com­mit­ted the phrase to mem­ory, and use it from time to time when I’m teach­ing young writ­ers. Prose, even jour­nal­is­tic prose, has rhythm and mood and rec­og­niz­ing it is very much like hav­ing an ear for music. It’s hard to teach that qual­ity, but show me some­one who under­stands the phrase — writ­ing you can dance to — and I know I can work with him or her.

From then on, I mainly just sat there and made dreamy eyes at my new hero. He made fun of AP leads and talked about the drive in from the air­port, and after­ward, I came up to gush. He said he had a book com­ing out, and could he send me a copy? Who, me? Um, sure…. “Fool’s Mercy” arrived at my apart­ment a few weeks later, with a note, “Please, run to your library and demand it be taken off the shelves.”

(Recall­ing that note, I won­der who might be the source of this Ama­zon reader review, penned by A Cus­tomer: “This is a novel that has taken the art of shap­ing the reader’s world­view and raised it to the level of phys­i­cal inter­ven­tion. By that I mean that Mr. Allen has dis­cov­ered tech­niques of using Eng­lish syn­tax to alter synap­tic rela­tion­ships within the brain itself, pos­si­bly per­ma­nently. He may have gone deeper, as well, func­tion­ing as the ana­log of a com­puter hacker as he cracks the DNA code and blithely rearranges the human genome with untold con­se­quences for gen­er­a­tions to come. Were this novel some outre exer­cise in mod­ernist befud­dle­ment, the dan­ger would be min­i­mal, but Mr. Allen’s dark­est motives are masked by a brisk yet poignant thriller pop­u­lated with haunt­ing per­son­al­i­ties. As such, it may pose the sever­est test the First Amend­ment has faced since the found­ing of our repub­lic — a book that is what the law calls ‘an attrac­tive nui­sance,’ but a nui­sance on the level of Jacob-Kreutzfeld syn­drome, the human equiv­a­lent of “mad cow” dis­ease. It should not only be banned, but all of its known read­ers should be rounded up like cat­tle and incar­cer­ated pend­ing central-nervous-system biop­sies. Mean­while, it remains avail­able to an unwary cit­i­zenry from Dryad Books, of 15 Sher­man Ave., Takoma Park, Md. 20912.” I have a sneak­ing sus­pi­cion.)

I still take “Fool’s Mercy” off the shelf from time to time, to soak in his grace­ful prose style. Is it a great thriller? Prob­a­bly not enough plot, and char­ac­ters a bit too three-dimensional. But there are some won­der­ful descrip­tions, and, well, it was sent to me per­son­ally by the author. Those books are always spe­cial.

The story linked above said Allen, a 68-year-old for­mer Marine and Viet­nam vet, was moved to vio­lence by the reac­tion of a reporter whose error-ridden “char­ti­cle” he was crit­i­ciz­ing:

(Allen) gave pretty much the same sharp-elbowed spiel to both Hesse and Roig-Franzia. Hesse responded by ask­ing for the story back so that she could iron out some of the wrin­kles.

Roig-Franzia responded by say­ing, “Henry, don’t be such a cock­sucker.”

Boom.

Oh, well. As is noted in the story, this is a new era in jour­nal­ism. Chicago Sun-Times writ­ers don’t pee off the ledges into the river any­more, either. It doesn’t mean we can’t miss the good ol’ days, at least a lit­tle.

Enjoy retire­ment, Henry. Write another novel. I’ll buy it. And I’ll still pay any price to hear what­ever writ­ing advice you might give at another Uni­ver­sity of Illi­nois work­shop.

So. Up until 2 a.m. last night, but with an E-day school hol­i­day, got to sleep clear until 8. They say you can count the hours of sleep Roger Penske gets on one hand, and that he is mas­ter of the power nap. He’ll announce, “I’m going to grab 40 min­utes,” put his head down, fall asleep imme­di­ately and awaken 39 min­utes and 59 sec­onds later.

My role model.

My other role model is Elmore Leonard. What does it say about me when my role mod­els are old men? Vig­or­ous old men, but still. The next thing you know, I’ll be ask­ing for a Via­gra pre­scrip­tion.

As you can imag­ine, yes­ter­day was in the crazy-busy, and today will be the same. With that heed­less extra hour of sleep I had to cut some­thing, and today it was: Gym. Haven’t done that in a while. (Where’s my medal?) But if I’m ever going to learn Russ­ian I have to give my home­work the respect it deserves, and today I have to write 10 sen­tences, using the gen­i­tive sin­gu­lar. I’m inspired because I watched a Russian-language movie Fri­day night, one of the few truly indo­lent me-times I get in the week, and I under­stood more of it than I thought I would. It’s like I’m trem­bling on the brink of another leap in under­stand­ing, and I want to nur­ture it along.

The film? “The Ital­ian,” or, as imdb​.com insists on translit­er­a­tion, “Ital­ianetz.” Worth your time, even with sub­ti­tles.

One of these days it’ll be you folks I cut loose. Don’t assume I’ve been kid­napped or any­thing.

One brief item of blog­gage: Eric Zorn finds the new GOP in North Car­olina. Cooze, is this one of your neigh­bors?

33 responses to
“Going down swinging.”

  1. Sue said on November 3rd, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    “One of these days it’ll be you folks I cut loose. Don’t assume I’ve been kid­napped or any­thing.”
    What? What?
    What?

  2. Nick said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    He had me groovin’ until Jacob-Kreutzfeld – it’s Creutzfeldt-Jakob. Even with a skip in the record, it still has a good beat.

  3. Scout said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    Sue, I had the exact same spit-take.

  4. Jeff Borden said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    “The Ital­ian” is a fine lit­tle movie. We watched it last year, after my wife ordered it from Net­flix in some­thing of a mis­take, but we both enjoyed it a great deal. There was a real sweet­ness to the film, but it cer­tainly did not sugar-coat the life of an orphan in Rus­sia these days. The young man who is the title char­ac­ter is a really empa­thetic and charis­matic actor.

    I’m read­ing only text­books until my grad­u­ate school semes­ter ends in a few weeks, which has given me a severe case of brain cramps. Why must text­books be ren­dered so impen­e­tra­ble? A good ex-journalist work­ing as an edi­tor would make an enor­mous dif­fer­ence in con­vey­ing the facts and the­o­ries in these books. Instead, I find myself read­ing the pas­sages two or three times before under­stand­ing dawns.

    Classes will be over and I’ll be at the in-laws in Florida for a long Thanks­giv­ing hol­i­day, so I have plenty of books lined up start­ing with Jane Mayer’s “The Dark Side,” but also includ­ing Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath.” While not in the dire straits of the Joad clan, my five-plus years of being “under­em­ployed” fig­ures in this deci­sion.

    One of my more adven­tur­ous pub­lic speak­ing stu­dents is read­ing “Atlas Shrugged,” because she wanted to learn what the term “going Galt” meant when she heard it from one of her con­ser­v­a­tive friends. She is hav­ing the same reac­tion I did when I was required to read it 30-plus years ago: It’s a mean-spirited cel­e­bra­tion of arro­gance and elit­ism poorly writ­ten and pop­u­lated by card­board char­ac­ters.

    This is why I love my stu­dents.

  5. John said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:42 pm

    wear­ing a pair of bib over­alls with a bikini top

    Please find and post a photo of this out­fit, enquir­ing minds and all that.

  6. coozledad said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Nancy: He’s run­ning against David Price, whose dis­trict is Greater Chapel Hill and some Ban­tus­tans of “The City of Cun­nilin­gus!©” Durham, NC. He’ll get a cou­ple hun­dred or so votes from Ruri­tans, Hell’s Angels, his mama, and his sister/wife. After the elec­tion he’ll have to go back to work sweep­ing the dri­ve­way of the funeral home.

  7. MichaelG said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Mr. Roig-Franzia sounds like a prime jerk. I’m always leery of peo­ple who fid­dle with names. Mr. Allen sounds like a man who has reached the end of his rope. Mr. Wem­ple has given us a very poorly writ­ten story. He needs Mr. Allen’s help.

    I’m with Sue and Scout. WTF?

  8. KLG said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    What John said. I think we are near-contemporaries and I saw more than one woman at my large South­ern State Uni­ver­sity in that out­fit! Some­times even with­out the bikini top. Those were the days. And about Henry Allen, any­one who calls another per­son a c*cksucker deserves to be punched out. Period. Once and for all. Prob­a­bly not as bad as the c-word, but almost.

  9. Joe Kobiela said on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    N,
    Bibs and a bikini top, went through your flicker page and couldn’t find THAT one. Please post.
    Pilot Joe

  10. Jason T. said on November 3rd, 2009 at 2:19 pm

    That reporter needed punchin’. Every news­room has at least one like that.

    And if the WaPo news­room is like other news­rooms which I’ve con­t­a­m­i­nated, Mr. Allen was just doing what all of his cow-orkers have wanted to do for a long time.

    Mr. Allen will drink for free on that punch for years, wher­ever real reporters con­gre­gate, and I hope he has a long, pleas­ant retire­ment, away from the likes of pri­madon­nas whose prose may not be edited, and who never let the “facts” get in the way of their copy.

  11. LAMary said on November 3rd, 2009 at 2:46 pm

    “…I have plenty of books lined up start­ing with Jane Mayer’s “The Dark Side…”
    I believe that is called The Dork Side in Louisiana.

  12. beb said on November 3rd, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    ‘bibs and a bikini top…’ Was that your Bana­narama or Dexie’s Mid­night Raider’s period? Re Pilot Joe and John… some­things are best left to the imag­i­na­tion.

    I was dis­ap­pointed to learn that Henry Allen punched a stu­dent rather that douche bag extra­or­di­naire, Fred Hiatt. If WaPo ever goes down it will be Hiatt’s fault.

    My daugh­ter also has a school hol­i­day today. “Pro­fes­sional devel­op­ment” it says on the cal­en­dar. What’s up with that?

  13. Jeff Borden said on November 3rd, 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Well, I never saw a fist-fight in a news­room, but one of my col­leagues attended a hol­i­day party in the news­room one year in the late 1970s and had a few too many Scotches. He more or less passed out, then vom­ited all over his desk. Pho­tos of him lying uncon­scious in a pud­dle of puke appeared for years after the event, just to keep him reminded of his folly.

    I try to not get very far into that “good old days” baloney, but it does seem like there are a lot of very prissy and enti­tled reporters out there. When I started at the Colum­bus Dis­patch in 1974, only an edi­tor could put a byline on a story, and they were fairly stingy with them, too. To the very end of my career, I always turned my sto­ries in sans byline. (This was more out of habit than any­thing else.) These days, most reporters type their byline first, then pon­der the lead.

    Times change. I get it. But when the largest and most pres­ti­gious news­pa­pers con­tinue to employ lunkheads –like the TV writer for the NYT who churned out mul­ti­ple bone-headed errors in her obit­u­ary of Wal­ter Cronkite and was rewarded by get­ting her very own copy edi­tor– it still makes my stom­ach hurt.

    I will toast Mr. Allen with a 12-year-old Scotch tonight. And, no, I will not throw up on my desk.

  14. Dorothy said on November 3rd, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    Sheesh am I the only one who under­stood the kid­nap­ping ref­er­ence??

    I think what Nance meant was that she’s very busy, and recently has not been to the gym. That’s what she had to “cut loose” recently to make time for other things, like Russ­ian home­work. Then she men­tioned that per­haps her blog/her loyal read­ers will be the thing she has to cut loose some other day. And we are not to think that per­haps she was kid­napped, but rather she was occu­pied else­where.

    Is this right, Nancy?

  15. nancy said on November 3rd, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Yes, that’s right, Dorothy. Although I worded it poorly (hur­ry­ing, as usual), all I meant was, there may be a day from time to time when things don’t get updated here, and all it means is, I have some­thing else to do.

    As for the other thing, Gene Wein­garten dis­cusses the Allen Affair here, far bet­ter than I ever could, and includes some excerpts of Allen’s jour­nal­ism. I’m sorry I was hur­ry­ing today, or I would have looked up more of it, and not made this all about a school­girl crush on a writer with an out-of-print novel. Long-form nar­ra­tive jour­nal­ism is where Allen was truly at his finest. I used to have a paper­back called “The Best of the Post,” which fea­tured some won­der­ful pieces, and many of them were his. Like a fool, I loaned it to a writer I thought could ben­e­fit from it, and never saw it again.

    My Russ­ian teacher gave me a matryoshka stamp on my home­work!

  16. Cynthia said on November 3rd, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    So it’s ok now to call your boss a “c*cks*cker” and keep your job? Unbe­liev­able.

  17. Jason T. said on November 3rd, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    At a news­pa­per, Cyn­thia? It’s prac­ti­cally a require­ment.

  18. whitebeard said on November 3rd, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    When I was night city edi­tor, an obnox­ious reporter and a copy edi­tor had a nasty ver­bal dis­pute about some tiny fact and the reporter van­ished. I did not smell blood so I fig­ured he was safe … and alive. It turned out he had spent hours in the morgue look­ing up files of prose gone by instead of writ­ing the story he was work­ing on. He sur­faced and chal­lenged the same copy edi­tor with a clip­ping that showed he was wrong and in a shrill, unpleasant-sounding voice chanted: “I was right and you were wrong, I was right and you were wrong, I was right and you were wrong. Say it, I was right and you were wrong, say it.” the copy edi­tor decked him and the reporter hit the floor, got up slowly after a few min­utes and called the police.
    When the police came, every­one in the news­room said he or she had not seen a thing. As “The Boss” I tes­ti­fied that I had not seen what hap­pened ear­lier but I saw the reporter on the floor beside the pic­ture desk and ven­tured a guess that maybe a pho­tog­ra­pher had brought in a wet print and there was water on the floor and the reporter had slipped and fell. The offi­cer grinned at me and said he would write in his report that there were no wit­nesses to the alleged “attack” and I had agreed, as the per­son in charge.
    This is the same obnox­ious reporter I had told to go home months later or I would kick his fat ass down every stair after he pointed out a fel­low reporter to riot­ers so they would chase him. He called the city edi­tor to com­plain, who called me and said I could have fired said obnox­ious reporter on the spot and he would have backed me 100 per­cent.
    I have been reluc­tant to Google his name in fear that he still is an unpleas­ant tack under the sad­dle of some­one else’s horse. He once pro­posed a res­o­lu­tion to ban women from the press club and every­one dis­liked him so much, even the chau­vin­ists, that they voted against his res­o­lu­tion, and admit­ted women to the sacred sanc­tum.
    Ah, the mem­ory; the copy editor’s punch was spec­tac­u­lar, right to the chin and the obnox­ious lit­tle twit was down for the count.
    I will buy a round in Allen’s name any time there is a con­gre­ga­tion of news­pa­per peo­ple and I am present.

  19. nancy said on November 3rd, 2009 at 7:25 pm

    What Jason said. A news­room ain’t an insur­ance agency, although lately they cer­tainly resem­ble them. Read what Wein­garten wrote, linked above; he gets the vibe pretty per­fectly.

    That’s a pretty good yarn, White­beard. Reminds me of the shoot­ings that hap­pen in dodgy bars in dodgier neigh­bor­hoods, when the cops walk out shak­ing their heads and say, “I counted 80 noses in that place. How could so many of them be in the bath­room at the same time?”

  20. Jolene said on November 3rd, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    Glad you found the Wein­garten piece, Nancy. I saw it ear­lier in the day, but didn’t have time to com­ment. You (and oth­ers) might also be inter­ested in this blog item by Joel Achen­bach, another of the best writ­ers at the Post.

    I came across this when I went look­ing for the “appre­ci­a­tion” of Hunter S. Thomp­son that Henry Allen wrote when Thomp­son died. Achen­bach links to that, so I’m post­ing his piece, as it’s a nice state­ment re how admired Allen is among his col­leagues.

  21. Deborah said on November 3rd, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    There seem to be sim­i­lar­i­ties in the world of design and writ­ing. I loved your descrip­tion of writ­ing sto­ries peo­ple can dance to. Design has rhythm and mood like music, it also has nar­ra­tive. I read the piece by Gene Wein­garten and that led me to read the piece by Sally Quinn. I’m not sure I get what was so hor­ri­ble about the Quinn piece but then again I know that it must be hard for non-design ori­ented peo­ple to under­stand what I think is really awful about some design out there. Some of this is just stuff you have to live and breathe to get.

  22. Jolene said on November 3rd, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    Henry Allen is, appar­ently, an artist too. He has a blog where he’s posted a fairly large col­lec­tion of pen­cil draw­ings, includ­ing a self-portrait. The draw­ings are very good, and the sub­ject mat­ter varies widely–still lifes, land­scapes, and por­traits, includ­ing an arrest­ing image of Lin­coln.

  23. Deborah said on November 3rd, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    I just posted and noticed that the time came up as 8:38, I checked my clocks to make sure but it was 6:38 CST. You are EST so it should read 7:38?

  24. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    Hat tip and dit­tos to Jason T. re: Mr. Allen.

    Back to hit­ting refresh on the local Board of Elec­tions web­site — i love not hav­ing to sit around the County Admin Bldg for hours in a tie on Tues­day nights.

  25. del said on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    Great story white­beard. Reminds me of a career pros­e­cu­tor I know, a gra­cious and dig­ni­fied man who would com­plain bit­terly that civil­ity pre­vented him from act­ing like that copy edi­tor. When he found him­self in such sit­u­a­tions he would, under his breath, cite scrip­ture to the end that Jus­tice ought be meted out swiftly, with a sword, or, in his words, a 2×4.

  26. del said on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    A favorite movie scene of his was when Tommy Lee Jones slams an inso­lent barkeep’s face into the bar in Lone­some Dove.

  27. brian stouder said on November 3rd, 2009 at 11:56 pm

    Here’s an exam­ple of why I am per­fectly happy to pay taxes so that police and oth­ers will approach the jobs that I’d find unap­proach­able; and why I’ll pay a sub­scrip­tion rate so that jour­nal­ists can try and fathom sto­ries I’d find unfath­omable:

    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​3​3​6​0​4​7​8​7​/​n​s​/​u​s​_​n​e​w​s​-​c​r​i​m​e​_​a​n​d​_​c​ourts/

    CLEVELAND – The num­ber of bod­ies found in and near a rapist’s home rose to at least 10 on Tues­day when author­i­ties unearthed four corpses from the back­yard and found a skull in a bucket in the basement.Cleveland police stopped search­ing for vic­tims for the night and planned to con­tinue on Wednes­day. They have extended their efforts to boarded-up homes in the neigh­bor­hood where res­i­dents com­plained for years of a stench that one even said “smelled like a dead body.”
    Some in the com­mu­nity want an inves­ti­ga­tion into why it took so long to trace the grisly source.

    Some­times one won­ders just how crazy things really are, just beyond the win­dow pane

  28. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 4th, 2009 at 12:31 am

    Why does the world keep chal­leng­ing my level of com­mit­ment to oppose the death penalty? Eh, he’ll get “NG by rea­son of insan­ity” and work out his days in a secure facil­ity, unless some­one free-weights his sen­tence a bit shorter as hap­pened to Jeff Dah­mer. (This poor deranged fel­low has to pass 17 to beat that level of evil lunacy.)

  29. Jason T. said on November 4th, 2009 at 12:48 am

    I would add one thing — the macho bravado that’s cel­e­brated in news­rooms can also make them very hos­tile, dis­cour­ag­ing envi­ron­ments.

    Not coin­ci­den­tally, the last news­room that I really enjoyed work­ing in was a sub­ur­ban office, dom­i­nated by women and with a female bureau chief. Every­one was com­pet­i­tive and fairly cyn­i­cal, but there was also coop­er­a­tion and peo­ple helped one another on big sto­ries.

    Nat­u­rally, the-powers-that-be broke us up. We were hav­ing too much fun and show­ing up the reporters “down­town.”

    Most news­pa­pers are run by peo­ple who have no man­age­ment train­ing, and they either stamp out any indi­vid­u­al­ity or let the inmates run the asy­lum.

    There has to be a mid­dle ground between bland, bor­ing news­rooms and “Lord of the Flies.”

  30. crazycatlady said on November 4th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    Moe- Please update us on how you’re doing…

  31. whitebeard said on November 4th, 2009 at 1:19 am

    Del, the story con­tin­ued many moons later when I received a call from the local police that said copy edi­tor, then a colum­nist, was sleep­ing it off in a jail cell after an alter­ca­tion in a bar and what did I want to do with him.
    I called his wife and explained the sit­u­a­tion and asked if she wanted him home sooner than later and her reply was keep him there, which is what I did, also ask­ing if I needed to post bail in the morn­ing. “No, we will just let him go when he wakes up,” the offi­cer said.
    Amaz­ing the num­ber of calls I received from the police about reporters, etc. One was about one of the police reporters who had been picked up because he matched the descrip­tion of a kid­nap­per and would I con­firm his iden­tity, which I did.
    Another was about the afore­men­tioned obnox­ious reporter in No. 18. He had been picked up in another city on the island of Mon­treal because the police thought he was a kid (he was quite short) who had stolen one of the newspaper’s press cars. I hemmed and hawed and asked for a bet­ter descrip­tion until he screeched: “Tell them it’s me, tell them to let me go.” I said that I guessed I could not sug­gest that the “lit­tle car thief” be locked up and the cell key thrown away and the police offi­cer laughed. ” Don’t want him back, do you?”
    I obvi­ously did not work in a bland, bor­ing news­room, Jason T., or maybe I made it less bor­ing.

  32. Dexter said on November 4th, 2009 at 2:06 am

  33. Dorothy said on November 4th, 2009 at 10:26 am

    crazy­cat­lady – moe can cer­tainly speak for her­self but I’ll use this oppor­tu­nity to direct you to her blog. I think Nancy links to it as well, if mem­ory serves cor­rectly.

    http://​moesmisad​ven​tures​.blogspot​.com/