nancynall.com » Soup without tears.

Soup without tears.

Jan­u­ary is National Soup Month. Before it slips into the books, let’s recall a few of the month’s steam­ing pots here at the Nall-Derringer Co-Prosperity Sphere:

Sweet potato bisque: I hap­pened to be at the Rus­sell Street Deli, an East­ern Mar­ket insti­tu­tion known for its spec­tac­u­lar soups, the week before Christ­mas, when this was on the menu. It was…mouth-gasmic. It fogged my glasses and my mind. I tried to con­sider what the “Top Chef” judges call its “fla­vor pro­file,” but my taste­buds were happy-dancing so, it was hard to get them to set­tle down and give some sober feed­back. It had many of the notes of a sweet potato pie — cin­na­mon, nut­meg, gin­ger — but was savory over­all. I found a recipe online that seemed to come close, using but­ter­milk for the tang, and whipped up a batch. It was very good, but not as good as Russell’s. Three stars (out of four).

Cur­ried but­ter­nut squash: An early impro­vi­sa­tion, inspired by Mark Bittman. I make a ver­sion of this every fall, basi­cally squash soup with curry and a tart apple thrown in the mix. For this, I left out the apple and added a can of coconut milk, and my friends? It was fab­u­lous. I’m buy­ing coconut milk every other week now. Four stars.

Cream of cau­li­flower: Another Bittman inspi­ra­tion, brought on by the peren­nial Jan­u­ary real­iza­tion that I could eat a lot more veg­eta­bles if I tried. Sauté onion and gar­lic, throw in a whacked-up head of cau­li­flower, cover with broth, sim­mer to soft­ness, puree and swirl in a half-cup or so of cream. Yum. Three-and-a-half stars.

Roasted gar­lic with white ched­dar: I make this in the win­ter most years, but not for the last few. It’s an old Betty Ros­bot­tom recipe, sim­plic­ity itself: Break up and peel two heads of gar­lic, cover with olive oil and roast in the oven for 40 min­utes or so. Mean­while, soften some leeks or onions or both, add a few pota­toes, cover with broth, sim­mer sim­mer sim­mer, etc. When it’s soft, throw in the roasted gar­lic [EDIT: Remove the gar­lic from the oil first] and puree. Fin­ish by stir­ring in a hand­ful of grated white ched­dar cheese. Serve with a green salad and crusty bread you can sop in the oil from the gar­lic roast­ing. Refrain from kiss­ing for the rest of the night. Four stars.

Chili: Because if it’s win­ter in the Mid­west, there will be chili. Every­one has their own favorite recipe. You don’t need to hear mine. Three stars.

No-cream of cau­li­flower and car­rot: This was last night. I had a head of golden cau­li­flower tee­ter­ing on the edge, so I made it the same way I did the other cau­li­flower soup, only I added a dou­ble hand­ful of car­rots and left out the cream and curry. Topped with some grated ched­dar, cocked my shot­gun, held it to the head of my daugh­ter and forced her to choke down 10 spoon­fuls or so, which she advised me were “gross.” Reader, it was not. It was deli­cious. Three and a half stars.

Note all the puree­ing. You can do it in batches in the blender, but that’s a pain in the ass. Far bet­ter to spend $30 on what Emeril calls a “boat motor” and most cook­books call an immer­sion blender. Mine broke last night, which seemed to be a fit­ting marker for the end of National Soup Month.

Although I will buy a new one this week­end. Because you really need an immer­sion blender. At least in our house.

Which takes us to the blog­gage at the end of a cold but sunny week here in the Mitten:

You want to know why peo­ple hate lawyers? Try the NFL’s jerk­ish­ness in try­ing to stop New Orleans retail­ers from sell­ing T-shirts and other mer­chan­dise fea­tur­ing the fleur de lis and/or the phrase “Who dat?” One of my Face­book friends, Ray Shea, said it best:

The fleur de lis pre­dates the exis­tence of the NFL by more than two mil­lenia. The fleur de lis has flown on flags over Lou­siana for more than four cen­turies. Black and gold has been asso­ci­ated with the Zulu Social Aid and Plea­sure Club for almos a cen­tury. The phrase “Who Dat” is more than a cen­tury old and exists in recorded New Orleans music since the 1930s.

The NFL is granted a tem­po­rary non-exclusive license to suck my balls.

Ray is an old friend of Ashley’s, and won my alle­giance to the Saints the night the team beat Indi­anapo­lis, and he posted, “Who dat push­ing Manning’s face in the turf? WHO DAT?” Indeed. Pey­ton Man­ning is a guy whose face can never be pushed into the turf too often.

I just surfed through Mem­o­ran­dum to see what’s going on in the world of pol­i­tics, and found this head­line: Palin to Obama: Stop the fin­ger­point­ing. And with that, irony died once again and I offi­cially declared the week­end under way.

So enjoy yours.

83 responses to
“Soup without tears.”

  1. Dorothy said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:33 am

    I started but could not fin­ish read­ing the Palin/Van Sustern inter­view. I started feel­ing nau­seous try­ing to count all the “you know“s that each of them used.

  2. A different Connie said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:35 am

    On kids forc­ing down soup: I once made some nommy carrot/ginger soup, roughly from the Moose­wood cook­book, pured with pis­ta­chios. My son reluc­tantly ate it, say­ing it tasted funny, and that was the day we dis­cov­ered his nut allergy.

  3. judybusy said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:43 am

    Now I just want to run outta the office and make about ten kinds of soup. In real­ity, I’ll be mak­ing a new chili recipe tonight that calls for re-hydrated New Mex­i­can and ancho chilies pureed, ham­burger and ground pork, plus the req­ui­site onions, gar­lic and cumin. Because we’re from MN, we’re adding beans. It will be served for lunch tomor­row after XC ski­ing with friends.

    I laughed pretty hard at that headline!

  4. coozledad said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:48 am

    I was tak­ing a wheel class in ceram­ics stu­dio dur­ing that carb-free diet insan­ity, and brought in a small bowl of potato leek soup to have as a snack. While I was heat­ing it up in the microwave a cou­ple of the other stu­dents began to decom­pen­sate, even at fairly long range.
    Seems the pow­ers of the human olfac­tory bulb are mag­ni­fied by starvation.

  5. Deborah said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:50 am

    There will be soup this week­end (you hear that Lit­tle Bird?). Maybe chili, the white kind.

    New Yorker Alert: Good arti­cle in the lat­est issue on Tea Bag­gers. Great cover illus­tra­tion too, by the same guy who did the fist bump one.

  6. LAMary said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:55 am

    I think Sarah Palin is get­ting blonder. It’s required for any women on Fox. Soon she’ll be blonde and have the dreaded Fox Lips.

  7. Dorothy said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:00 am

    A co-worker knows I dis­like kid­ney beans, so she gave me her recipe for bean­less chili and I make it reg­u­larly now. It has one pound each of ground meat, ground sweet sausage and ground hot sausage. Then chopped toma­toes with jalapeno pep­pers, chili pow­der, tomato juice, etc. Oh man, oh man do I love it!

    That Sweet Potato Bisque might find its way onto our table this week­end — or the Roasted Gar­lic and White Ched­dar. It sounds divine.

  8. 4dbirds said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:01 am

    I like a good old fash­ioned navy bean soup.

  9. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:17 am

    Don’t for­get a nice tomato soup, either minestrone-style or smooth/creamed, made from a cou­ple of jars of toma­toes from last year’s gar­den.
    Our chili has to include onions cut into large enough pieces so they can be picked out and big, not small, chunks of tofu (frozen, thawed and drained, then cut into 1/2 — 3/4″ cubes). This is what hap­pens when you give birth to a picky eater then raise her as a vegetarian.

  10. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:22 am

    Oh, man. This thread is mak­ing me really hun­gry. One of the best soups I’ve made was this corn chow­der, which was deli­cious and also very pretty. The chopped red pep­per, sweet potato, and corn give it great color. Can’t remem­ber for sure, but I prob­a­bly made it with whole milk or half-and-half instead of cream.

  11. paddyo' said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:25 am

    I couldn’t read it, either, Dorothy — I was kinda get­tin’ some whiplash there, y’know?

    Plus (and this is ver­ba­tim from She Who Will Not Be Named):
    “That’s point­ing fin­gers, kind of cre­at­ing more con­tention and divi­sion than needs to be. And that way, gosh, human nature is a desire to work together and get things done, these elected offi­cials. They know who they’re work­ing for. The peo­ple who are their bosses, their vot­ers, they sent them there expect­ing com­mon sense solu­tions, just get the job done.”

    W … T … F

  12. Dorothy said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:34 am

    It’s a won­der her eyes aren’t crossed, she talks in so many cir­cles, right paddyo’?

    Sue we have made soup from our gar­den toma­toes twice in the past 10 days. The taste is just out of this world. We walked into Lowe’s after church on Sun­day and we both sort of gasped — BIG racks of seeds for your gar­den, in the store in JANUARY!!!! That was a balm on that cold win­ter day, let me tell you. Speak­ing of which, it seems my sis­ter Janet and my daugh­ter might be pounded with snow this week­end at the shore (Vir­ginia). Janet’s sons don’t even own boots. Won­der which shoe store they’re going to after school today? Zack is excited — he turns 15 on Sun­day and an accu­mu­la­tion of 5 – 10″ of snow is a great birth­day present.

  13. Peter said on January 29th, 2010 at 11:56 am

    No kid­ding, Dorothy — I made it almost 1/3rd and my head hurt so much it wasn’t funny. Oh yeah Sarah, you have just bent over back­wards to help with health care.

    Good soup/bad soup — next week is the dis­trict Klondike Derby — each kid brings a can of soup, they’re all thrown in one pot, heated up and passed out, and I swear it tastes so much bet­ter than it sounds…

  14. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 12:07 pm

  15. Jenine said on January 29th, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Warm sweaters and good soup, Jan­u­ary com­forts. Here’s my offer­ing: Chicken Corn Asianesque Soup. Also con­tains coconut milk. Total yum.

  16. Joe Kobiela said on January 29th, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    Greet­ings from freez­ing Lex­ing­ton Ky.
    Just a quick note for Ms. Nall, I think they have horses down here. I went to break­fast, took some back roads and wow, pas­tures, huge barns, and curvy roads, with big old houses.
    Like to see it in the sum­mer.
    Pilot Joe

  17. Rana said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    paddyo’ — wtf indeed. How dare Obama tell the Sen­a­tors to lis­ten to their vot­ers and get things done when all they want to do is lis­ten to their vot­ers and get things done. Uh, what?

  18. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:05 pm

    That’s a pretty blog, Jenine, and the recipe sounds good too. Just curi­ous … are there other cooking-related blogs that you all fol­low? I don’t do as much cook­ing as I should, but I always like to look at the pictures.

  19. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:10 pm

  20. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    Rana, I hate to say it, but our elected offi­cials ARE lis­ten­ing to their vot­ers. This is very much a squeaky wheel thing. So call, now, and get other like-minded vot­ers to do the same.

  21. Bob (not Greene) said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    Ahh­h­h­hhh! I just tried to read the tran­script of the Palin-Greta thing and my eyes hurt. The woman can’t put together a coher­ent thought. She was a gov­er­nor! I can’t believe she was even elected mayor of some­thing. Can you imag­ine cov­er­ing a city coun­cil meet­ing and try­ing to quote her or try­ing to inter­view her? Gah.

  22. moe99 said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    Glad for the notion of soups. I can heartily rec­om­mend the chicken coconut curry soup dished out by our local Met­ro­pol­i­tan Mar­kets. Which I will be serv­ing for lunch (just got the word y’day they would be pass­ing through) with my dear friend Randi, her hus­band and daugh­ter. Randi and I went to Spencer School and Defi­ance Junior High together, so this will be a mid­west­ern reunion.

    And Joe K, as a 5 year res­i­dent of Lex­ing­ton who still has fam­ily there, let me rec­om­mend that you go visit when Keeneland is in ses­sion. 2 weeks in the spring and 2 weeks in the fall. Unfor­tu­nately they now have an announcer sys­tem, but it is still the pret­ti­est track out there.

  23. nancy said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:25 pm

    The best thing about Keeneland — besides the century-old oaks in the pad­docks and the grace­ful archi­tec­ture and the gor­geous horse­flesh — is that they assume every­one there has at least min­i­mal horseman’s skills, and the sad­dling areas are all open to spec­ta­tors. You’re expected to use com­mon sense, but as long as you do, come on in and stand close enough to the next Ken­tucky Derby win­ner to brush his tail. (At least that’s what I’m told. Never been there myself.

  24. John said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:37 pm

    Just had Spicy Sausage Soup with white beans and kale at The Voodoo Grill and Betsy has veg­etable soup ready for tonight. This is Soup Season!

  25. Deborah said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    And don’t for­get the bour­bon. I designed exhibits for a bour­bon museum in Ver­sailles near Lex­ing­ton (for the Wood­ford Reserve brand). I knew every­thing there was to know about bour­bon for awhile, but have for­got­ten much of it except the taste. It’s a beau­ti­ful place, in the rolling blue­grass area, sur­rounded by fancy horse farms.

  26. Little Bird said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:47 pm

    Oh yes, there will be soup. I fig­ured I’d make French Onion soup, from scratch. Yes, the beef stock too. It will take roughly 5 hours to make. I also fig­ured we’d have a cae­sar salad. And we’d make the dress­ing. And the crou­tons. Sound good?

  27. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    Have you folks been lis­ten­ing to Obama speak to the Repub­li­can House mem­bers? They’re hav­ing a retreat some­where in Bal­ti­more, and he gave a short speech and has been tak­ing ques­tions for about an hour. I hate to sound like a dewy-eyed teen-ager, but, really, it is so excit­ing to have a pres­i­dent who can speak clearly, has the facts at his com­mand, is will­ing to lis­ten, and able to push back.

    He is really chal­leng­ing them on the way they have described the stim­u­lus pack­age, the health care pro­gram, and such, i.e., in terms of death pan­els, pulling the plug on Grandma and so on. Key state­ment: When you char­ac­ter­ize the health care pro­gram as a Bol­she­vik plot, you leave your­selves very lit­tle room to negotiate.

    It would be lovely to think this exchange could make a dif­fer­ence. I think, just for today, I’ll believe that it will.

  28. Deborah said on January 29th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

    I just stepped out to get lunch and bring back, now I’m eat­ing a bowl of loaded cream of potato soup and it’s pretty darned good too.

  29. Jenine said on January 29th, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Jolene, my favorite food blog­ger is Smit­tenKitchen. Great pho­tos and well proofed recipes. I like the Pio­neer Woman too but for her sass rather than the cui­sine. Who’s your pick of the litter?

  30. Peter said on January 29th, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    Sue, the Kansas guy and the Lan­drieu break-in artist sure have one thing in com­mon — they are smack dab in the mid­dle of their alter­nate universe.

    The prob­lem with those nuts is drugs. Too much or not enough, that part I can’t fig­ure out.

  31. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Jolene:
    ’He is really chal­leng­ing them on the way they have described the stim­u­lus pack­age, the health care pro­gram, and such’
    Now he needs to do the same thing to the dems.
    Peter:
    ’The prob­lem with those nuts is drugs. Too much or not enough, that part I can’t fig­ure out.‘
    Excellent!

  32. MRMARK said on January 29th, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Wow, love the soup/food dis­cus­sion Nance. Check out this deli­cious Lemon Pound Cake my wife made for my 40th (gulp) Birthday.

    Remem­ber how young we were when you spoke at my Senior High din­ner back in FTW?? (circa 1988).

  33. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Now he needs to do the same thing to the dems.

    I agree, although I think that, at least w/ regard to health care, it’s fair to say that it’s the R’s who are most guilty of dis­tort­ing what is really hap­pen­ing – and of being cav­a­lier of what will hap­pen if noth­ing is changed. The video and tran­script of O’s exchange w/ the R’s is online, and there’s a dis­cus­sion of the exchange at Politico.

  34. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    Jenine:

    I like Smit­tenKitchen too. Alexandra’s Kitchen is another good blog by an indi­vid­ual, although she could ben­e­fit from the ser­vices of an edi­tor. Seri­ous Eats and Slash­food have lots of good things, but they’re too busy to read every­thing. Also, too many arti­cles re restau­rants in towns I’m not likely to visit. And, of course, Mark Bittman’s blog at the New York Times. That’s more than I can pay atten­tion to, but, of course, I’m always curi­ous about what I might be missing.

  35. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    Carrot-sweet potato soup yes­ter­day, lentil stew for Sat­ur­day night; I’ve just plain given up on bay leaves, hav­ing been asked “do they actu­ally add any­thing to the fla­vor?” and not had an answer.

    Had to toss this in here, since I sus­pect it will be enjoyed whether you liked Salinger or not — http://​www​.rut​land​her​ald​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​2​0​1​0​0​1​2​9​/​N​E​W​S​0​2​/​1​290341

    I can just see the first seat­ing for those roast beef din­ners. Been to many of them, but all in all, it sounds like he wasn’t much of a recluse after all, he just didn’t have any­thing else to pub­lish. Maybe he actu­ally learned some­thing from his creepy rela­tion­ship with Joyce Maynard.

  36. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    Oh, absolutely Jolene. But dems had chance after chance to get the mes­sage out, even when things were chang­ing on a daily basis, and they didn’t. How hard is it for all of them to come together and refute the most obvi­ous non­sense? Or, why weren’t they all on-message together, point­ing out basic things, like while you might have health insur­ance, your kid prob­a­bly doesn’t past age 18 and these days is also likely to be priced out of a mar­ket intended to make money for share­hold­ers more than pro­vide actual health­care? This kind of stuff — pro­vid­ing basic infor­ma­tion — should be able to work as well as death panel scare tac­tics, and no one was doing it at a level that could be heard. If they all stayed on-message like that, maybe there might have been news cov­er­age com­pa­ra­ble to what was pro­vided to the death panel liars.

  37. Rana said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:27 pm

    Sue, I do con­tact my Con­gress­men, reg­u­larly. And each time I get a bland non-answer, and busi­ness as usual con­tin­ues. The thing is, my views are a minor­ity among their vot­ers, so they don’t have to worry about los­ing my vote. Besides, I have a hard time believ­ing that the com­ments of one ran­dom woman are as per­sua­sive as the com­ments of large donors and cor­po­ra­tions. So long as their com­peti­tors at the elec­tions are worse, they don’t need to improve.

    Besides, many of the things that I ask for are seen as inher­ently unrea­son­able, like cov­er­ing abor­tion or end­ing our depen­dence on fos­sil fuels, or allow­ing more third-party par­tic­i­pa­tion. Those get the let­ters that tell me that I should be grate­ful that they’re work­ing to fight child­hood obe­sity. I keep telling them what I want, repeat­edly, but as far as I can tell, it’s like talk­ing to a wall. Increas­ingly I’m head­ing towards apa­thetic non-voter ter­ri­tory, because it doesn’t seem like my views mat­ter at all — so why give them the cover of my appar­ent endorse­ment by vot­ing for them?

    Any­way… the point of my com­ment wasn’t to talk about vot­ers and their rela­tion­ship to Con­gress­folk. It was to make fun of Palin scold­ing Obama for telling peo­ple to do some­thing she says they’re already doing.

  38. Bob (not Greene) said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    Speak­ing of J.D Salinger, this is the angle only a home­town news­pa­per can get.

  39. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    But dems had chance after chance to get the mes­sage out, even when things were chang­ing on a daily basis, and they didn’t.

    I couldn’t agree more. I do fault Obama for not doing a major pre­sen­ta­tion w/ charts and graphs that would explain how things are, what the trends are, and what the gen­eral struc­ture of the pro­posed reforms is. The level of pub­lic igno­rance on these points is mas­sive. Oppo­si­tion to the gen­eral idea of reform melts away (or, at least, dimin­ishes greatly) when peo­ple are asked about spe­cific ele­ments of the plan. Lots of peo­ple aren’t going to pay atten­tion no mat­ter what he does, but he and the Con­gres­sional Dems could have done better.

    The video of today’s dis­cus­sion (the whole thing) is now up at C-SPAN. It’s prob­a­bly too long to watch unless you’re doing some­thing else, but, if you’re cook­ing or wash­ing dishes or rid­ing your exer­cise bike, it’s worth a listen.

  40. Bob (not Greene) said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    Nev­er­mind — Jeff (TTMO) beat me to it!

  41. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:36 pm

    Rana: I agree that the responses you get from con­tact­ing peo­ple in Con­gress are gen­er­ally lame, but I don’t think that’s a rea­son not to do it. They may not gen­er­ate indi­vid­ual responses to your queries or be moved to sup­port causes that only a minor­ity of vot­ers favor, but, on big issues, they do total up the pro and con calls. There is, I think, no doubt, that it was right-wing out­rage that killed com­pre­hen­sive immi­gra­tion reform, which was, in my view, one of GWB’s few good ideas.

  42. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 3:43 pm

    Rana, the tack I’ve been tak­ing with calls and emails is: what is the point of vot­ing if my vote means noth­ing? If it is more impor­tant to appease the peo­ple who won’t vote for you any­way, why do you think you can count on my vote? Or, as I write at the end of my emails, “Are you TRYING to get me to sit out the next elec­tion?“
    The peo­ple I have talked to (and I’ve got­ten through to an actual per­son each time, even at the White House line), have been a lit­tle uncom­fort­able with that thought.

  43. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on January 29th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    Bob, don’t you love the idea of the hard­ware guy and the lady at the post office telling the spring flood of Eng­lish majors var­i­ous snipe hunt routes to “Jerry’s place”? You get a good sense of the place from the arti­cle, and it seems like a good place. Salinger made some bad deci­sions in life, but pick­ing Cor­nish wasn’t one of them.

  44. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 4:17 pm

    Haven’t vis­ited Bossy for awhile, but my good­ness, her take on the State of the Union address is as usual, insight­ful polit­i­cal analy­sis not seen else­where:
    http://​www​.iam​bossy​.com/

  45. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    One more com­ment on Obama among the R’s. This one is from Mark Ambinders at The Atlantic. Sorry to be tire­some on this point, but it’s so rare to have some­one make so much sense in a pub­lic forum.

  46. Sue said on January 29th, 2010 at 4:42 pm

    Jolene, tying this in with Nancy’s link to Sarahville, when Pres­i­dent Palin gets her turn, I sin­cerely hope we get to see the mir­ror image of what hap­pened today.

  47. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    when Pres­i­dent Palin gets her turn, I sin­cerely hope we get to see the mir­ror image of what hap­pened today

    Hon­estly, I don’t think I could bear it. James Fal­lows called “Obama among the R’s” the most inter­est­ing thing you can watch today.

  48. nancy said on January 29th, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    I’m sorry I missed this. Fal­lows’ embed­ded video is not what he thinks it is, but I was struck by this line:

    I would like to hear from spokes­men for the once-strong “Obama can’t pos­si­bly think with­out his teleprompter” camp after watch­ing more than an hour of live Q-and-A.

    I am well and truly aston­ished by how often I hear this, STILL. I mean, I can’t count how often we’ve seen this man take ques­tion after ques­tion, think on his feet and do so with grace, style, brains and even humor. And yet I still see this one on blogs. That’s my cue to never take another word that per­son says seriously.

    I see Mike Pence was one of the ques­tion­ers, refer­ring to “lit­tle David Carter and his dad.” The use of “lit­tle” in front of a child’s name (unless it’s done to sort out a child with the same name as an older rel­a­tive) is another one of those instant “you’re a smarmy ass­hole” mark­ers for me.

  49. Jolene said on January 29th, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    Nancy, the link in Fallows’s text (or the link in my mes­sage re C-SPAN above) will take you to the video of the whole dis­cus­sion. Am not sure exactly what Fal­lows is doing w/ the short piece embed­ded in his post.

    And, yes, Mike Pence is a dick and a dope too.

  50. LAMary said on January 29th, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    JeffT­MMO, add too many bay leaves and you’ll know what they can do.

  51. Floral Joy said on January 29th, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    You just made me really hun­gry and I don’t have any­thing at home to make soup with. If you’re ever in mid­town in Man­hat­tan, you should go to the soup nazi (the one from Sein­feld). It’s the best soup ever!

  52. Rana said on January 29th, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    Sue, I think I will steal that line!

    I haven’t sunken into apa­thy and I don’t intend to, but it does grow dis­cour­ag­ing, and I am becom­ing more con­vinced that the idea that vot­ing on its own is suf­fi­cient to prompt change is flawed and dan­ger­ous. It’s too easy to think that check­ing a box every few years is enough; it’s not. Instead, one has to be more involved on a reg­u­lar basis, and, boy howdy, is that tir­ing. *wry expression*

  53. Dexter said on January 29th, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    I am not a horse­man but a for­mer co-worker always went in April, and from our talks I real­ized that for him, Keeneland was as clas­sic old base­ball parks were to me, the kind of place where a per­son stops and real­izes they are in a place where they would rather be than any place else on the planet.

    I used to get that way at Wrigley Field, and he got that way at Keeneland. Oh, one time I sent a C-note with him to take to Churchill Downs and place a bet on the Derby. My horse won, but I bet on him to show. “Always put it on the nose!” I heard that for a year.…
    ~~~~~
    I had soup for lunch. Bean curd soup from Ori­en­tal Express in Auburn, Indi­ana.
    Tofu squares, sliced car­rots, broc­coli flo­rets, water chest­nuts, a lit­tle bok choi , in chicken broth. A nice side for my veg­etable lo mein. I love that lit­tle place — it’s been there for years, in the old Scott Store Plaza, Grand­staff Drive North.

  54. Michael said on January 29th, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    Alright, I’ve just spent a week at a national con­fer­ence of lawyers so maybe I’m feel­ing a lit­tle bit of pro­fes­sional defen­sive­ness. But let’s all get this straight; “Lawyers don’t sue peo­ple — peo­ple sue peo­ple”. We are hired to advo­cate on behalf of our clients and the sys­tem only works when even ass­holes have com­pe­tent legal counsel.

    The NFL and the Saints are engaged in intim­i­da­tion. The fleur de lis is in the pub­lic domain. A law stu­dent can argue that com­pe­tently. Before this is over a very com­pe­tent lawyer will do the same thing.

  55. moe99 said on January 29th, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    John Cole over at Bal­loon Juice has the best line:
    “If Mike Pence really is regarded as one of the deep thinkers for the GOP, I’m begin­ning to under­stand why they refused to admit Terri Schi­avo was brain-dead.”

  56. basset said on January 29th, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    I have only been on a horse once in my life, at the fair when I was ten, and didn’t care for it, but my aunt and uncle are sup­pli­ers to the horse busi­ness in Lex­ing­ton and we have been there sev­eral times, includ­ing once when I had too much wine, way too much, and behaved badly at one of their par­ties. Woke up the next morn­ing with a vicious hang­over and couldn’t fig­ure out the plumb­ing in their guest room, so I cleaned up by stick­ing my head under the bath­tub tap in between bouts of ver­tigo and got dressed just in time for the spe­cial treat they had pre­pared for us — a trip to one of the local breed­ing farms.

    Arti­fi­cial insem­i­na­tion is not allowed in the “blood horse” busi­ness, breed­ing has to be done by the nat­ural act. I will spare you the descrip­tion of the “teaser” mare and her respon­si­bil­i­ties, as well as the groom with the big leather gloves. Believe me, two horses going at it, no mat­ter how nice the stone barn they’re in, is not what you want to see when you have one of those damn near hal­lu­cino­genic hang­overs, no mat­ter how quickly the horses get it over with.

  57. nancy said on January 29th, 2010 at 8:49 pm

    I think one of Tom Wolfe’s nov­els — “A Man In Full,” if I recall cor­rectly — fea­tures about a 30-page descrip­tion of that very act, and you are very cor­rect, Basset.

    We toured Select Sires, a cat­tle breed­ing facil­ity, when the National Soci­ety of News­pa­per Colum­nists met in Colum­bus many years ago. There, it’s the guy with the scimitar-shaped whatchamacal­lit you don’t want to know about. It’s all AI there, but they still use teasers to get the sires in the mood.

    What a life a select sire has.

    Oh, and Michael, I’ll give you your due on lawyers. But why doesn’t any with a J.D. tell the NFL to back the hell off before they write the cease-and-desist let­ters? That’s just chick­en­shit intimidation.

  58. Deborah said on January 29th, 2010 at 9:07 pm

    Just watched the 80 minute or what­ever C-span Obama con­fronta­tion. Well worth the watch from start to fin­ish. Thanks for the link.

  59. basset said on January 29th, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    was it Allen Gins­berg who men­tioned hav­ing had a hang­over that was so intense it was almost like a mesca­line high?

  60. moe99 said on January 30th, 2010 at 12:22 am

    bas­set, when I lived in KY, what you heard about was the teaser male horse, not a female teaser.

    Mares are vicious when they are in heat and you need some­one to ‘get them in the mood” so they don’t dam­age the stud. Studs are multi mil­lion dol­lar invest­ments and a ‘love bite’ or a kick from a mare in heat can really dam­age that invest­ment. The teaser pony is intro­duced and at the very last minute, yanked out and the stud is ‘inserted’ into the breed­ing room in place of the teaser pony.

    So the fig­u­ra­tive job that no one really wants is to be the teaser pony for the stud. There was in fact a law­suit filed in Lex­ing­ton against a farm where the teaser pony actu­ally made it – the mare gave birth to a colt that looked noth­ing like the stud and every­thing like the teaser pony. All the guys in my law school class were high fiv­ing each other when we learned about it. It musta been a guy thing.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teaser%20pony

  61. Dexter said on January 30th, 2010 at 1:07 am

    No image, none, stayed with me in great clar­ity of recall like the sight of the breeder insem­i­nat­ing a cow in the barn. I saw it 52 years ago. For a kid, it was “SO GROSS!“
    http://​www​.every​day​ca​reer​.com/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2​0​0​9​/​0​9​/​d​a​i​r​y​10.jpg

  62. Joe Kobiela said on January 30th, 2010 at 8:28 am

    Dex­ter, its Ori­en­tal Gourmet, not express, if were talk­ing about the same place. Over by the radio sta­tion in Auburn. Wife and I eat there at least once a week. We call the gal behind the counter “the gen­eral” because of the way she keeps the place run­ning.
    Pilot Joe

  63. basset said on January 30th, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Mare, stud, what­ever… I was just try­ing to act inter­ested and not throw up where any­one could see me.

    Four inches of snow overnight in Nashville and sleet on top of it which froze into a hard crust. Good day to stay in.

  64. alex said on January 30th, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    “If Mike Pence really is regarded as one of the deep thinkers for the GOP, I’m begin­ning to under­stand why they refused to admit Terri Schi­avo was brain-dead.”

    moe, sel­dom any­more does any­thing make me laugh so hard that I pee. Thanks for mak­ing my day.

    I think all this spec­u­la­tion about Pence’s pres­i­den­tial poten­tial is as non­sen­si­cal as the talk about Palin’s. Polit­i­cally he’s prob­a­bly indis­tin­guish­able from Mike Huck­abee, who could barely make a dent in the GOP pri­maries last time around, and doesn’t have Huckabee’s telegenic pres­ence or oth­er­wise lik­able per­son­al­ity. Pence is an odd mix of pop­ulist lib­er­tar­ian and bluenose theo­crat all dressed up in an empty suit with no fire in the belly. He’s regarded as a ris­ing star in the party only because the media haven’t yet busted him shoot­ing his damn fool mouth off in any way wor­thy of national scorn. But just you wait.

  65. Jolene said on January 30th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    He’s regarded as a ris­ing star in the party only because the media haven’t yet busted him shoot­ing his damn fool mouth off in any way wor­thy of national scorn. But just you wait.

    That day might not be too far away. As Matt Ygle­sias points out, it might come sooner if the peo­ple inter­view­ing him had more sub­stan­tive exper­tise themselves.

  66. Deborah said on January 30th, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    I just did some­thing I said I’d never do, I went to Michele Malkin’s blog to see what the right wing was say­ing about Obama at the Repub­li­can event. Now I feel like I need a shower. I can’t believe I even read all the com­ments. I’m going to have to wash my eyes out with bleach. Very nau­se­at­ing. I don’t rec­om­mend it.

  67. Scout said on January 30th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    I think La Palin has aready acquired the req­ui­site Fox Bimbo lips. As a mat­ter of fact, I think she has had the full plas­tic make over. Her face was a frozen mask dur­ing her post-SOTU “analy­sis” the other night. It was hilar­i­ous watch­ing her try to lift an eyebrow.

  68. brian stouder said on January 30th, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    Mike Pence may indeed be as dumb as a post, but grant him this much: he had sense enough to know that Evan Bayh would have dropped him like a bad habit, for the Sen­ate seat.

    I’ve always thought Pence’s chief polit­i­cal asset, here in Indi­ana, is his resem­b­lence to Bobby Knight (but with­out the paunch, or the brains).

    Leav­ing him aside, here’s another guy to add to the wacko-list: Allen County Sher­iff Ken Fries. On the Pat White radio show yes­ter­day, he solemnly swore that he will per­son­ally oppose any effort by “the Feds” to come into Allen County and dis­arm cit­i­zens(!); this in answer to a moon-beam caller who expressed the fear that “the Feds” will try and do this any time now. The Sher­iff said he has the power to oppose any such move, and he would exer­cise it to the fullest extent. He might as well have pledged to fight off any and all space aliens that may descend upon Allen County, Indiana.

    Fries looks a lit­tle like that nude model who just won a Sen­ate seat in Mass­a­chu­setts. When he tries to become “a Fed” office holder, it will be worth remem­ber­ing that he’s insane

  69. beb said on January 30th, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    Moe98, re “teaser ponies” at least there are no fluffer ponies.…

  70. whitebeard said on January 30th, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    Deb­o­rah et al, I will never link to a Malkin site ever again but a thought did come to me about Obama’s dar­ing move, it was like Daniel in the lyings den

  71. brian stouder said on January 30th, 2010 at 8:40 pm

    A total non-sequitur:

    Here in Fort Wayne, there is a major shakeup com­ing in sev­eral of our largest high schools; prin­ci­pals and assisi­tant prin­ci­pals are being re-assigned all around the dis­trict, which has some peo­ple all atwitter.

    And today was the annual FWCS school choice fair at Northrup High School, which Grant (our 14 year old) and I went to, since he is work­ing on decid­ing which high school he wants to attend.

    As we made the rounds, an attrac­tive tv newsie zigged right into us and started ask­ing ques­tions (the arti­cle saves the best for last)

    http://​www​.wane​.com/​d​p​p​/​n​e​w​s​/​w​a​n​e​-​f​t​w​a​y​n​e​-​P​a​r​e​n​t​s​-​p​i​c​k​-​s​c​h​o​o​l​s​-​a​m​i​d​s​t​-​s​h​ake-up

    (We also saw our­selves on TV, which is always a jar­ring expe­ri­ence; and, I shud­der to think I almost didn’t shave before we headed to the expo!)

  72. alice said on January 30th, 2010 at 8:46 pm

    I feel com­pelled to strongly sec­ond the won­ders of the immer­sion blender, and to men­tion the Two Fat Ladies always referred to it as “the kitchen vibrator.”

  73. moe99 said on January 30th, 2010 at 10:20 pm

  74. Dexter said on January 30th, 2010 at 10:48 pm

    What the hell! As I was watch­ing some fab­u­lous col­lege games — men’s bas­ket­ball games, I now am made aware a new Miss Amer­ica was crowned.
    I remem­ber when the pageant was huge, every­one talked about it, Bert Parks sang the song, every­body had the TVs on…it really was big.
    Now it is on TLC? I think I get it on cable, but I have never watched any­thing on it, cer­tainly not the Gos­selins.
    Well, Miss Vir­ginia won, I didn’t see a sec­ond of it, and for all the hours I lis­ten to all that talk on my XM radio, not one radio per­son­al­ity even gave it two sec­onds of men­tion before­hand.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~
    Pilot Joe: you are right, of course, it’s Ori­en­tal Gourmet. Who needs extrav­a­gant buf­fets when we have a place like that? I eat there about twice a month.

  75. Dave K. said on January 31st, 2010 at 12:41 am

    Regard­ing Mike Pence’s deci­sion not to run for Sen­ate against Evan Bayh. I fig­ured the RNC made that call, think­ing, “Why try and defeat Sen­a­tor Bayh when he is already as help­ful to our agenda as a Republican?”.

    I sin­cerely hope that he will prove me wrong.

  76. alex said on January 31st, 2010 at 11:58 am

    Well, Dave, from what I’ve read, Pence’s level of senior­ity in the House is such that he’d be fool­ish to leave at this point, and that the polls pur­port­ing to show Pence beat­ing Bayh if an elec­tion were held today aren’t reli­able enough to make it a risk worth tak­ing. Of course, his announce­ment that he won’t run for Bayh’s Sen­ate seat is now fuel­ing the gos­sip that he intends to run for pres­i­dent in 2012.

    If you believe the prog­nos­ti­ca­tors, the GOP pri­mary in 2012 will again fea­ture a wide field of mostly une­lec­table can­di­dates talk­ing crazy shit, from which a tepid mod­er­ate who talks out of both sides of his ass will emerge as vic­tor for the thank­less job of being stomped into the ground by a charis­matic incum­bent pres­i­dent. If Huckabee’s pol­i­tics knocked him out of the race early on in 2008 despite the force of his per­son­al­ity, it’s hard to imag­ine why Pence would even bother, but you never know.

  77. Jeff Borden said on January 31st, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    So long as the Repub­li­can Party is dumb­ing itself down, embrac­ing the inner yahoo and dis­tanc­ing itself from edu­ca­tion, accom­plish­ment and achieve­ment, guys like Pence are going to be men­tioned as poten­tial national candidates.

    She Who Must Not be Named has made smil­ing stu­pid­ity fashionable.

  78. moe99 said on January 31st, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    Used to be that pol­i­tics was con­sid­ered “Hol­ly­wood for ugly peo­ple.” Now it seems that pol­i­tics is “Hol­ly­wood for beau­ti­ful but really dumb people.”

  79. brian stouder said on January 31st, 2010 at 6:00 pm

    I con­fess that I laughed out loud when I read that John Edwards is the star attrac­tion on a sex tape, now in the pos­ses­sion of the tell-all-book-of-the-week guy.

    One could have guessed that a per­son as self-conciously beau­ti­ful as he is, would want to star in such a thing; but the detail that made me laugh is this one (empha­sis added):

    http://​abc​news​.go​.com/​2​0​2​0​/​J​o​h​n​_​E​d​w​a​r​d​s​_​S​c​a​n​d​a​l​/​j​o​h​n​-​e​d​w​a​r​d​s​-​m​a​d​e​-​s​e​x​-​t​a​p​e​-​a​b​o​r​t​i​o​n​-​p​l​e​a​-​a​i​d​e​/​s​t​o​r​y​?​i​d​=​9​680626

    Young, who had worked for Edwards since his 1998 Sen­ate win, said he was absolutely sure it was his boss in the tape. “It’s def­i­nitely him. You never see her face. But you see — you clearly see his face for a long time. And I can’t speak for the other body parts, but it’s def­i­nitely his face,” Young told ABC News.

    What a maroon!

  80. Jeff Borden said on January 31st, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    Maybe some­day John Edwards will make a sex tape with Paris Hilton, though the risk of a dan­ger­ous over­load of vapid­ity might pre­vent such a union.

    I believe it was in a novel by John Barth, but there’s a pas­sage where the hero/narrator is hav­ing sex with an impres­sion­able young woman. He gets a glimpse of them mak­ing the two-backed beast in the mir­ror and finds the imagery so hilar­i­ous he begins laugh­ing uncon­trol­lably. This does not go over well the woman, need­less to say, but in his mind, the phys­i­cal sen­sa­tion of sex is over­come by the wild tan­gle of limbs he observes.

    Maybe John Edwards should read some John Barth.

  81. Deborah said on January 31st, 2010 at 7:32 pm

    It is so true that the Repub­li­cans have fig­ured out that attrac­tive­ness sells… Except when it comes to peo­ple like Rush, then it’s bully-ness. If you can’t be attrac­tive be a bully, that seems to be the strat­egy. When you look at the “babes” on Fox, it’s just so obvi­ous how shal­low it is. I will say that Obama is attrac­tive and that prob­a­bly didn’t hurt him one bit. Edwards just got creepier and creepier as his cam­paign pro­gressed. He seemed super obsessed with his looks as time went on.

  82. Dorothy said on January 31st, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    I made the roasted gar­lic and white ched­dar soup for din­ner tonight, aided by our very own “kitchen vibra­tor” (thx alice!) and it was deli­cious. Thank you Nancy for shar­ing the recipe!

  83. basset said on January 31st, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    We made the cream of cau­li­flower, but with broc­coli and no cream, just a lit­tle milk that hap­pened to be part of some left­over potato soup I threw in there. Car­rots for color, potato cubes for tex­ture, wasn’t bad at all.

Leave a Reply