Yeah, I know — the pictures are atrocious. All I can say in my defense is: I’m a writer, not a photographer, dammit! and the working conditions are, er, challenging. It’s bellies-to-bummies sardine-packing in most of these throwdowns, and my top priority is: Keep up with the pace. So I haven’t had the luxury to hang around until the crowd thins out and get a nice beauty shot.
Otherwise, it’s very hectic and mostly fun.
It’s also 6:15 a.m. and I have another press conference in about an hour, so better shove off.
I’ll be here all day, under the heading Auto show today.
brian stouder said on January 9, 2006 at 3:28 pm
I liked your pictures – Good stuff!
35 chars
alex said on January 9, 2006 at 3:52 pm
So GM plans to resurrect the Camaro? I wonder if they can replicate all of the charming little quirks I remember. Like the the leaky windows and saggy doors. Like the cheezoid interior finishes that disintegrate like cotton candy. It’s the one car I ever owned that succumbed almost entirely to gravity.
303 chars
Dorothy said on January 9, 2006 at 3:55 pm
I must be doing something wrong. I can’t find ANYTHING written by or photographed by Ms. Nall at the Freep. Suggestions, anyone??
131 chars
Dorothy said on January 9, 2006 at 4:06 pm
Never mind (says Emily Litella). I found it!
45 chars
Dave said on January 10, 2006 at 11:40 am
Is the Camaro as reminescent of a 1969 Camaro as the retro Mustang is of a 65-66 Mustang. Hard to tell from the picture, sorry if it’s yours, no wish to offend.
Chrysler and the hype on the SUV? Really, what the world needs, more SUV’s.
241 chars
Dave said on January 10, 2006 at 11:42 am
Off topic but was surprised my comments showed up. I must have been pre-approved to the new, improved website, which is much easier to read. Thank goodness I don’t have to wear two pairs of glasses at once!
208 chars