nancynall.com » The fruit-pie front.

The fruit-pie front.

sunflowers.jpg

I know I used a ver­sion of this pic­ture before, sev­eral sunflowers-in-the-silver-pitcher episodes ago, but this is why I bought this thing. It might as well get its publicity.

It was a sun­flow­ery day, the kind of day that makes you wish sum­mer would never end, even though I noted with cha­grin today that I must start mon­i­tor­ing the front win­dow again. As the sun creeps south, it length­ens its reach into the liv­ing room and threat­ens to bleach the fur­ni­ture. In win­ter, a sunny day means the blinds stay closed most of the day. And now…

…I’m start­ing to sound like Lileks. A bet­ter solu­tion: Get some of that bleached-muslin fur­ni­ture and let the solar radi­a­tion make it even whiter..

Finally saw “Syr­i­ana.” And finally, was grate­ful that I’d waited for the DVD, because this is a movie that requires a sec­ond view­ing, prefer­ably the next day, to sort every­thing out. But I’m glad I did. Every­body talks about the stars of a movie, and so it seems every­one knows George Clooney packed on a toddler’s weight in fat to play a CIA agent, but why doesn’t any­one ever talk about Chris Cooper? He’s, like, the great­est char­ac­ter actor since Gene Hack­man, and I didn’t even know he was in this thing. In the last sev­eral years I’ve seen him play a horse trainer, an orchid thief, a Kansas state police detec­tive, a homo­pho­bic Marine and now an oil­man, and he just dis­ap­pears into every char­ac­ter. I’d hire him to train my horse and run my oil com­pany, I would. I think he could do it.

Any­way, it’s hard to say what “Syr­i­ana” is about, because if I say, “It’s a demi-thriller about the com­plex­i­ties of the global oil busi­ness,” that sounds pretty bor­ing, and it’s not, really. You should see it, if you haven’t already, if only for Tim Blake Nelson’s speech about cor­rup­tion. (“It keeps us safe and warm!”)

Not much today, as I’m busy and blah blah the usual excuses blah blah. Ash­ley, our reg­u­lar com­menter and long­time pen pal, was in both the L.A. Times and Sun-Times yes­ter­day, and he wasn’t even charged with a felony, AND the sto­ries were on two dif­fer­ent top­ics. Links at his joint.

Mean­while, as the nation’s threat level remains at red, I’m con­tin­u­ing my pie-related coun­ter­pro­gram­ming. Today: Mmm…blueberry.

blueberry.jpg

13 responses to
“The fruit-pie front.”

  1. Dorothy said on August 14th, 2006 at 6:37 am

    We saw Syr­i­ana about 2 weeks ago. Wow. I was just amazed at how good it was. I am not a col­lege grad­u­ate but I’m no dummy, either. Still, we paused the DVD player at least 5 times so Mike could straighten out the mul­ti­ple plots for me and keep me straight. You’re right about Chris Cross. Money in the bank, that guy.

    (Danny the peach pie was done at 7:30 last night. Two pieces are miss­ing and you bet­ter come over soon if you want a slice!)

  2. Bob said on August 14th, 2006 at 7:55 am

    This sum­mer I went beyond keep­ing the liv­ing room blinds closed. I have a lot of south– and west-facing win­dows; they’re great for solar heat in win­ter, but they raise hell with the air-conditioning bill in summer.

    I went to Lowe’s and bought some sheets of foil-backed insu­la­tion board, the kind they use for sheath­ing new houses. I cut pieces to fit inside my win­dow cas­ings, and put it against the win­dows, foil side out, behind the venet­ian blinds. It’s not very vis­i­ble from the inside, not very pretty from the out­side, and effective.

    The com­fort level in the house on hot days improved a lot, and I think the small amount of addi­tional power con­sump­tion from increased use of com­pact flu­o­res­cent lights is more than off­set by the sav­ings in air-conditioning costs.

    Yes, I’m a nerd.

  3. Dorothy said on August 14th, 2006 at 8:29 am

    Ooops. Chris Cooper.

  4. brian stouder said on August 14th, 2006 at 10:56 am

    So here’s a ques­tion — Is Mitch Harper’s treat­ment of Nicole Manske on his FWOb blog bla­tently sexist?

    I think it is. (he is now bury­ing it with newer posts)

    http://​indi​ana​.type​pad​.com/fwob/

  5. mary said on August 14th, 2006 at 10:59 am

    A big old loquat tree fell down this win­ter, and now my south and west fac­ing win­dows are com­pletely exposed. I never needed blinds before, but now all the win­dows have wooden blinds on them. The dif­fer­ence that tree made was huge, and I didn’t real­ize how big that dif­fer­ence was until it was gone.

  6. Danny said on August 14th, 2006 at 11:05 am

    Dorothy, I will not be in the Greenville area until Christ­mas. Go ahead and let some­one else have those two pieces. :-(

  7. Dorothy said on August 14th, 2006 at 11:17 am

    Okay if you insist. Maybe there will be fresh Christ­mas cook­ies by the time you come, though! Cheer up!

  8. nancy said on August 14th, 2006 at 11:52 am

    Brian, I’m going to say no. I think Mitch responds pretty well to your ques­tion in his own com­ments, so I’m not going to great lengths about it. I’ve been form­ing some other opin­ions about FWO, how­ever, and may put them in a post some­where down the line, maybe later in the week.

  9. brian stouder said on August 14th, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    Well, when I fol­lowed the links that the blog­gers he cites based THEIR assess­ments of Nicole Manske’s roman­tic inter­ests(!!??!) upon, I found dead links to the IndyS­tar, and then links to Wikipedia!

    Wikipedia strikes me as no bet­ter than say­ing “lots of peo­ple think[fill in the blank] — it is sim­ply not a worth­while citation.

    Plus, one of the motor-sport blog­gers refers to Ms Manske as

    an (ahem) “reporter”

    which I took as a sour grapes, wrapped in sexism.

    Full dis­clo­sure — I posted some­thing like this response a few hours ago, and it never made it into the thread.

    Fur­ther full dis­clo­sure — I argued with Craig Lad­wig (an old N-S guy) on another thread at FWOb, and whereas he got sev­eral posts, my last effort never made it past the approval stage.

    By way of say­ing — FWOb can be run how­ever Mitch chooses.…and if your nascent essay on that site makes the point that it has shifted from a more general-interest regional blog into a sub­ur­ban Repub­li­can white guy blog…then I AGREE!!

  10. alex said on August 14th, 2006 at 4:10 pm

    Yes, Brian, Mitch is selec­tive about whom he allows to post. A few times my remarks have been squelched, and I’d say it’s been either on account of my bawdy sen­si­bil­i­ties or lib­eral world view.

    But I don’t see sex­ism in ques­tion­ing how Nicole Manske can report objec­tively on rac­ing when she’s been around the, uh, track more than a few times.

  11. Kevin Knuth said on August 16th, 2006 at 9:54 am

    If you like Chris Cooper– check out “LONESTAR”.

    GREAT MOVIE!

  12. chcheese said on August 16th, 2006 at 12:47 pm

    I’ll see(saw) your “Lone Star” and raise “Octo­ber Sky”

  13. Tom said on November 5th, 2006 at 11:26 pm

    “Well, when I fol­lowed the links that the blog­gers he cites based THEIR assess­ments of Nicole Manske’s roman­tic interests(!!??!)

    }snip{

    Plus, one of the motor-sport blog­gers refers to Ms Manske as
    an (ahem) “reporter�?
    which I took as a sour grapes, wrapped in sexism.”

    Let me put this very bluntly as a for­mer reporter (one who would never con­sider going back to news­pa­pers): It is an absolute con­flict of inter­est for a reporter to date one of the peo­ple he or she cov­ers, and it is one of the most obvi­ous exam­ples of lack of pro­fes­sional ethics. Miss Manske’s inabil­ity to keep her hands off the mer­chan­dise, so to speak, does not speak well of her.

    So it wasn’t sour grapes.