nancynall.com » Our communities, ourselves.

Our communities, ourselves.

One of the things that inter­ests me about the inter­net is its community-building poten­tial. Over­whelm­ingly, this is a good thing, at least for me — I’ve “met” peo­ple online that I’ve later met in per­son, widened my cor­re­spon­dence con­sid­er­ably and gen­er­ally find life far more inter­est­ing with e-mail than with­out it. It goes with­out say­ing that if you’re a par­ent of a child with a rare dis­ease, or a dog-fur knit­ter, or a body-modification enthu­si­ast liv­ing in a small Indi­ana town, you no longer need to feel you’re the only one in the world car­ry­ing your bur­den. Surely there’s a Usenet group for you, or a blog, or whatever.

No mat­ter how small the pond, the inter­net sup­plies a map.

One of the more interesting/amusing com­mu­ni­ties to start talk­ing amongst them­selves has been the…well, I’m not sure what they call them­selves. New Urban­ists, Crunchy Con­ser­v­a­tives, New Tra­di­tion­al­ists, who the hell knows? I don’t think they do, either. The face they present to the world is of polit­i­cally con­ser­v­a­tive Chris­tians who reject the go-go mar­ket forces beloved by the rest of their con­fed­er­ates, and in some lifestyle mat­ters verge dan­ger­ously close to filthy-hippiedom. Rod Dreher, the self-designated crunchy con, is prob­a­bly the arche­type. He eats organic veg­eta­bles (and can go on at great, bor­ing length about it), lives in a Crafts­man bun­ga­low, likes urban neigh­bor­hoods over sub­urbs, etc.

Here’s a pro­to­typ­i­cal post from a Fort Wayne blog called The Good City. The author grew up in the Fort, moved away to New York City, mar­ried and had a few kids, and decided to come back to a place where a fam­ily of five didn’t have to share 700 square feet. It starts like this:

Tonight I’m sit­ting out on the front porch of our 100-year old rental house in a paleo-urbanistic neigh­bor­hood, and I’m quite enjoy­ing myself. The porch light is on, my pipe is lighted, my legs are propped up on the balustrade, and a slight chill is in the air. Though dark out­side, the old-fashioned street lamps allow me to see clearly up and down the street and notice the won­der­ful rhythm of other houses with sim­i­lar front porches. Quickly, how­ever, the charm­ing atmos­phere so much pro­moted by New Urban­ists begins to fade as I notice that I’m the only one actu­ally out­side on my front porch. Well, you say, maybe it’s because this is the cold­est night so far this fall. Not true, how­ever. This has pretty much been the same as every other night: for all prac­ti­cal pur­poses, no one is ever out on their front porch!

Where are they?! Don’t these peo­ple know this man returned from NYC to sit on this porch? Why aren’t they pop­u­lat­ing his fan­tasy of front-porch America?

Well, it didn’t take me more than a cou­ple times walk­ing up and down the block to real­ize the prob­lem: instead of sit­ting out on the front porch, every­one is inside watch­ing TV!

How dare they.

This makes me chuckle because I’m mostly in agree­ment with him — I, too, love old houses and front porches and wish oth­ers did, too, so we could stop build­ing hor­ri­ble sub­di­vi­sions and the like. And I’ve writ­ten about it. I guess I didn’t real­ize what a scold I must have sounded like. (Just one tip for the blog­ger: In Indi­ana, they call a balustrade a porch railing.)

But not even in my scoldiest moments could I have writ­ten some­thing like this, by Patrick Deneen: “It’s a Destruc­tive Life,” all about how George Bai­ley destroys Bed­ford Falls:

George Bai­ley hates this town. Even as a child, he wants to escape its lim­it­ing clutches, ide­ally to visit the dis­tant and exotic locales vividly pic­tured in National Geo­graphic. As he grows, his ambi­tions change in a sig­nif­i­cant direc­tion: he craves “to build things, design new build­ings, plan mod­ern cities.” The mod­ern city of his dreams is imag­ined in direct con­trast to the enclo­sure of Bed­ford Falls: it is to be open, fast, glit­ter­ing, kalei­do­scopic. He craves “to shake off the dust of this crummy lit­tle town” to build “air­fields, sky­scrap­ers one hun­dred sto­ries tall, bridges a mile long.…” George rep­re­sents the vision of post-war Amer­ica: the ambi­tion to alter the land­scape so to accom­mo­date mod­ern life, to uproot nature and replace it with mon­u­ments of human accom­plish­ment, to re-engineer life for mobil­ity and swift­ness, one unen­cum­bered by per­ma­nence, one no longer lim­ited to a mod­er­ate and com­pre­hen­si­ble human scale.

You know, it occurs to me he might be kid­ding. But he might just as well be not. The Crunchy Cons blog, which ran at National Review Online when the book was pub­lished, swiftly descended into blan­ket pro­nounce­ments that any­one who moves away from the (small) town of their birth is, prima facie, a bad par­ent and a self­ish whelp. I liked it bet­ter when we said things like, “It takes all kinds” and left it at that.

OK, some new year house­keep­ing notes: Along with the sexy and cur­va­ceous Ash­ley Mor­ris and four oth­ers, I’ll be par­tic­i­pat­ing in a group blog on sea­son five of “The Wire,” which all fans know starts this com­ing Sun­day. The first episode is avail­able On Demand now, and I’ve watched it twice, but I’m not post­ing any­thing until Sun­day. Very old-media of me, I know, but some­times a lit­tle stew­ing time is bet­ter than nyah-nyah-I-got-here-first speed. The site’s up now, and called — what else? — The New Pack­age.

(Not-even-a-spoiler: One of the many small jokes in this mul­ti­lay­ered series is the back­ground noise of the cor­ner touts call­ing out their wares, the brand names of which change peri­od­i­cally and reflect the times we live in; in past sea­sons we’ve heard them push­ing heroin called WMD and Pan­demic. There’s a new one this year. We should start a pool on what it will be.)

Blog­gage:

Hank tells us what’s in and out for 2008. You know he’s right.

No, it’s not just you: Net­work news sucks out loud. John Hock­en­berry has some thoughts.

On the sec­ond day of the New Year, I resolve to bring some order back to my chaotic office. Bet­ter get started.

36 responses to
“Our communities, ourselves.”

  1. MichaelG said on January 2nd, 2008 at 9:24 am

    Agy­ness Deyn? = Agnus Dei? Lamb of God? WTF is she try­ing to say? Has any­body told the Pope?

    Vinho Verde  —  Here I’m way ahead of kool. Been drink­ing it for years. It’s $4 to $9 a bot­tle at BevMo. Clean, clear, crisp with a hint of a sparkle. It’s a great, refresh­ing sum­mer treat. The “Verde” refers not to the color of the wine but to the state of the grapes when har­vested. They’re some­what green rather than fully ripe. Try some. You’ll love it.

  2. Julie Robinson said on January 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am

    When first mar­ried, we bought a home in a decay­ing neigh­bor­hood. Though we came from the oppo­site end of the polit­i­cal spec­trum we were no less dewy-eyed about build­ing com­mu­nity than the new urbanists.

    Real­ity quickly led to dis­il­lu­sion­ment. Trashed yards, par­ents scream­ing obscen­i­ties at chil­dren, motor­cy­cles at 3 am, and fre­quent “domes­tics” were all part of the daily fare. There were a few good peo­ple, but they were sim­ply overwhelmed.

    By the time our daugh­ter was three or four, we knew we had to get her out of there, but of course it wasn’t easy to sell the house. It took two years and we still lost money. So much for our naivete.

    I will say that we never felt unsafe. The crim­i­nals that lived in our neigh­bor­hood knew there was noth­ing of value, so they com­muted else­where to com­mit their crimes.

    I much pre­fer the com­mu­nity here at NNC!

  3. alex said on January 2nd, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Fort Wayne’s crunchy cons/new urban­ists strike me as hav­ing con­trol issues, the same pathol­ogy shared it seems by every­one who pur­sues a career in archi­tec­ture. Quite an odd fan­tasy world they have in their heads too, mix­ing bour­geois bohemian con­sumerism and holy rol­lerism. Impu­dent lit­tle closet cases, methinks.

  4. Dorothy said on January 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 am

    We are hop­ing to build a new home here in Mount Ver­non or Gam­bier once our South Car­olina house sells. Plans include a wrap around porch — just write if Pas­tor Jeff and his wife want to stop by for a glass of home­made ice tea! And all of you are wel­come to stop by, too. NNC is my favorite shar­ing web­site of all time.

  5. michaela said on January 2nd, 2008 at 11:24 am

    Argh, time to start the annual blog-cott of NN.C, since we refuse to pony up for HBO despite our great and abid­ing love for The Wire. We were able to watch sea­son 4 already thanks to some, umm, less than legal DVDs pro­vided by my dad… hear­ing about 5 is gonna kill me.

    So I guess that means it’s time to check out exactly how much Time Warner will extort from us if we splurge for the last season…

  6. 4dbirds said on January 2nd, 2008 at 11:27 am

    The Meerkats are out? Never.

  7. Vince said on January 2nd, 2008 at 11:32 am

    I must be liv­ing in fan­tasy land. My neigh­bors and I have front porches and actu­ally use them! We’re less likely to be sit­ting on them watch­ing each other than we are to hang out on each other’s porches together.

    We talk. We read. We eat Chi­nese take-out together on our front
    porches.
    That said, there aren’t many of us. Just 5 homes on our long block who stay out front frequently.

    But this being Port­land, we’re the crunchy with­out the con.

    Oh. One thing more. NOT ONE of our porches has a rail­ing (or balustrade). We teter a full one, per­haps two feet above the ground unpro­tected!
    They must be death traps in wait­ing! Quick call Date­line NBC.

    (Hockenberry’s piece is long but worth read­ing. Espe­cially telling: a net­work “stan­dards” per­son watched every news mag­a­zine story to insure they are accept­able in the same way cen­sors vet every Sat­ur­day Night Live script.)

  8. Peter said on January 2nd, 2008 at 11:47 am

    Alex, if I may speak for my fel­low archi­tects, bite me.

  9. John C said on January 2nd, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    I lived for 13 years in Chicago, all of them in “the neighborhoods” — as opposed to the down­town and lake­front high-rises. Our last place was across the street from a Catholic church that had two Masses in Eng­lish, one in Span­ish and one in Pol­ish. Talk about a melt­ing pot! (And I’m sure my older son barely remem­bers the pros­ti­tutes we used to pass, politely say­ing excuse us we walked up behind them, on morn­ing walks in his baby stroller.) Like most peo­ple we set­tled on sub­urbs because of schools. But we drifted toward urban­ish ones, like Oak Park. Believe it or not, leafy Grosse Pointe qual­i­fies, at least for us. There are side­walks, for one. A great many new sub­urbs don’t have them, which makes it harder on the lit­tle ones and the walk­ers. Also, there are sev­eral small shop­ping dis­tricts, one of which is walk­ing dis­tance from our house. And our kids walk to school, as do most kids round here. One thing we lack is a front porch, which I wish we had. But we get along with our neighbors.

  10. John C said on January 2nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    By the way, I haven’t read Hockenberry’s story. But should it sur­prise any­one that a net­work would want to look at sto­ries before they aired? I’ll fight cen­sor­ship wher­ever it rears its ugly head. But the owner of a sta­tion mon­i­tor­ing what is to be broad­cast is hardly that. Maybe I’m miss­ing something.

  11. Carter said on January 2nd, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Off-topic, Nancy, but for the last week or so, 1/2 of the main text, ver­ti­cally, of NN.C has been obscured by the blue back­ground ema­nat­ing from the left mar­gin. The com­ments are clear and read­able but the text requires squinting.

  12. nancy said on January 2nd, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Carter, I think it’s a photo prob­lem. Work­ing on it now.

  13. LAMary said on January 2nd, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Sort of off topic: my older son and I saw a pro­mo­tion for a net­work show called “Cash­mere Mafia,” which looked like some muta­tion of “Sex and the City” via “Sopra­nos.” This led both of us in the same direc­tion, that being the next show cre­ated will be a com­bi­na­tion of “The Wire” and “Big Love.” Mor­mons in Bal­ti­more! Polyg­a­mist drug dealers!

  14. Welcome nancynall.com visitors « the good city said on January 2nd, 2008 at 1:03 pm

    […] 2, 2008 (Jon) Nancy didn’t know how to label us. We don’t really know, […]

  15. Kim said on January 2nd, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    When I lived in Oak Park, IL (John C. were we neighbors? — S. Ridge­land for me) I hung out on my front porch all the time. After mov­ing to VA we sur­ren­dered the front porch of the 100-year-old home for a brand-new con­tem­po­rary with no front porch but the late 1900s replace­ment: the screened-in back porch. The bet­ter to hide from the neigh­bors, I guess. Any­way, our move from that house to a crazy mash of mid-last-century has restored our front porch, which I hang out on all the time. Took out the old porch post-hurricane and restored it with­out balustrades. Scary!
    I first encoun­tered vinho verde in Por­tu­gal about 20 years ago. Try it; it’s delicious.

  16. virgotex said on January 2nd, 2008 at 1:47 pm

    There’s a new one this year. We should start a pool on what it will be.)

    Sub-Prime?

    Surge?

    ille­gal immigrant?

  17. nancy said on January 2nd, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    Our front porch in Fort Wayne is one of the few things I truly mourn about the place. We spent plenty of time there. We also spent time watch­ing TV. I guess my prob­lem with too much of this new-urbanism blather is how swiftly it descends into moral finger-shaking about watch­ing too much TV, not to men­tion its pro­mo­tion of an ideal I’m not sure ever existed. That’s one rea­son the George Bai­ley screed blows my mind — the author writes as though Bed­ford Falls was an actual place, and not just a col­lec­tion of Hol­ly­wood sound stages.

    Same with front-porch Amer­ica. For every per­son who loves hang­ing out on the swing and drink­ing a cold beer on a warm sum­mer evening, there’s another who’d pre­fer to be in the back, behind a screen, or maybe turn­ing burg­ers on the grill. The big front porch was what houses had before air-conditioning, and I really can’t blame peo­ple for pre­fer­ring A/C to slap­ping mos­qui­tos out front. It really does take all kinds to make a world.

  18. alex said on January 2nd, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Not sure what front-porch Amer­ica looks like in other cities, but here in the Fort it’s usu­ally uphol­stered and squalid, a spare bed­room for drunk and job­less ne’er-do-well in-laws.

  19. MichaelG said on January 2nd, 2008 at 2:20 pm

    My front porch is a large, airy, usable, porch with an old time glider. Peo­ple do use front porches here and back yards as well. It’s a nice place to have a cigar, sip some­thing (maybe some vinho verde) and read. Of course my neigh­bor­hood is a tad dif­fer­ent from most of yours. For exam­ple I haven’t had any Mor­mons or Wit­nesses at my door but I have had the Black Mus­lims politely invit­ing me to ser­vices. I’m sure they were relieved I didn’t go. And the 6 — 8 drug sales­men who hang on the porch across the street all wave and say “Hi, Mike” when I park my car. Liv­ing alone here is fine, but I wouldn’t want to live here with kids. New Years Eve mid­night sounded like some arab city with every­body fir­ing their weapons into the sky. Seems like so many peo­ple con­fuse their idea of what real­ity should be with what real­ity actu­ally is.

    Kim — talk­ing about wine in Por­tu­gal: The first time I went there I bought a nice bot­tle of vin­tage port  —  then dropped it in the park­ing lot at JFK. I almost wept.

  20. ashley said on January 2nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    New Orleans is now the big-ass petri dish for New Urban­ists and every­body else with some type of archi­tec­tural agenda to push. Me, my kids walk to school, I sit on my porch and smoke ille­gal cig­ars and drink fine adult bev­er­ages. Some times the neighbor/columnist comes over and shares in the bev­er­age and cigar consumption.

    This feels sort of organic. Pretty much the polar oppo­site of hell Sea­side.

  21. Scott Greider said on January 2nd, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Nancy,

    Thanks for the plug. I think.

    I didn’t mean to offend or finger-wag with this post, but rather express sad­ness over one of the losses Amer­i­can soci­ety has sus­tained with the astro­nom­i­cal increase in TV view­ing: social inter­ac­tion and con­cern result­ing from front porch activ­i­ties. Being nei­ther a soci­ol­o­gist nor a writer, per­haps I don’t under­stand it or didn’t express it well enough, but it seems to me there must be con­nec­tions between some Amer­i­can social ills (social dis­con­nect­ed­ness, 50% divorce rate, record low char­i­ta­ble giv­ing, unfath­omable lev­els of pornog­ra­phy usage, etc.) and the pop­u­la­tion spend­ing record amounts of time being enter­tained in front of a box. Sure it’s a big state­ment, and cer­tainly needs con­tour­ing (Jon’s bet­ter at that than I am). But I felt it was worth putting out there, at least.

    In the end, I am look­ing to be happy. And I’ve found that help­ing oth­ers be happy is the pri­mary means by which I become happy. Dis­con­nected lives, often times brought about by archi­tec­ture (the near com­plete dis­ap­pear­ance of the front porch from the Amer­i­can home) or media con­sump­tion (aver­age per­son watches more than four hours of TV a day!), make it much harder for that to hap­pen. There­fore, I’m sad. And inter­ested in what could change to make that hap­pen bet­ter. Might be naive, but I feel it in my gut and I don’t know what else to do.

    BTW, at The Good City, I’m the more hot-headed and provoca­tive one, while Jon’s the more sen­si­ble and soft one. I hope read­ers will read some of his level-headed posts before they write off the blog and it’s ideas — if that’s what they were inclined to do from read­ing your post.

  22. brian stouder said on January 2nd, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    New Years Eve mid­night sounded like some arab city with every­body fir­ing their weapons into the sky.

    I saw a report on an Indi­anapo­lis sta­tion over the hol­i­day. They set a cam­era on a street cor­ner (38th and somewhere-or-other)

    and you could hear a cas­cade of shots echo­ing in the night, includ­ing auto­matic weapon fire. They let the video run for 20 sec­onds, and it sounded like a pitched battle…in Indi­anapo­lis, Indiana.

  23. Dorothy said on January 2nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    This past Mon­day night was the first New Year’s I can remem­ber where I did not hear noises of any kind at mid­night. It’s quiet out here in the country!!

  24. Colleen said on January 2nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    We un-enclosed our porch in the Fort sum­mer before last…restored it to such a degree that we got a cita­tion from ARCH. We sit out there in the sum­mer, on our wicker rock­ers, some­times play­ing backgam­mon, but dang…it’s HOT! I blame A/C more than TV for lack of porch sitting.

    And Alex…my route to work takes me past those porches. But you for­got the dirty dia­per clad babies…

  25. Andrea said on January 2nd, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    After burn­ing through sea­sons 1 – 4 begin­ning with ep. 1 on Aug. 1 and watch­ing eps. 49 and 50 on New Year’s Eve, we signed up for dig­i­tal cable with free HBO for 60 days to watch sea­son 5 (sadly, no on-demand). We might have to pay for one month to get the entire sea­son, but it’s well worth it.

  26. Carter said on January 2nd, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    All fixed, Nancy. Thanks.

  27. John C said on January 2nd, 2008 at 5:38 pm

    I used to be a police reporter in Chicago. One of the things I learned is this: At pre­cisely mid­night and for a good while after that on Dec. 31, all cops that can be are in their cars parked under over­passes, or in the precincts and area head­quar­ters, away from the win­dows. Here in Grosse Pointe, a good friend told me that when they put a new roof on, roofers found many bul­let marks. It’s one of those things that makes for teeth gnash­ing. I don’t own a gun but know many peo­ple who do. I’m for rea­son­able gun con­trol and feel that decent folk who hunt or col­lect or target-shoot or feel they need pro­tec­tion should more or less be able to own a weapon. But what kind of moron thinks it is in any way accept­able to stand out in the yard in a densely pop­u­lated area and fire round after round — every one of them with a not insignif­i­cant chance of killing some­one — into the air. Sheesh!

  28. basset said on January 2nd, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    New Year’s Eve in the early 80s in Jack­son, Mis­sis­sippi… I’m week­end anchor on the number-three tv sta­tion, nobody’s left in the news­room after we’re done at ten-thirty so I take a portable scan­ner home and lis­ten for what might develop.

    Right at the stroke of mid­night, the police and fire dis­patch chan­nels light up — gas-line explo­sion on the main street down in the hood! I call the on-call pho­tog­ra­pher, grab a cam­era myself, and scoot on down there; turns out some drunk rolled out of a bar when the ball dropped, shot a deer rifle straight up in the air, and hit a 17-kilovolt power line which fell onto a no-parking sign. All that cur­rent arced down the sign and into the ground, where it found a gas line, split it and set it on fire — so what we have is a gas flame the size of a small car squirt­ing out of a crack in the curb.

    We all stand around and watch it awhile. Pho­tog­ra­pher shows up, sees a hooker he knows, sets the cam­era and recorder (this was back in the days of 3/4 tape) on the ground next to me and they dis­ap­pear for awhile. Aside from that, not much hap­pens for the next cou­ple of hours until the gas com­pany finally shows up and shuts the line off, the crowd dis­perses, we’re done, noth­ing to see here, every­one go home.

    Mean­while… I’m not an archi­tect but I work with a bunch of ‘em, we are a New Urban­ist, sustainability-sensitive orga­ni­za­tion, and Alex, you can bite me too. Good to see you got your vocab­u­lary words for the week in there, though.

  29. nancy said on January 2nd, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Give Alex a break now. Fort Wayne’s nerves are a lit­tle frayed on the sub­ject of uppity architects.

    Oh, and by the way: Great story, Bas­set. I’d have loved to see that.

  30. John C said on January 2nd, 2008 at 9:11 pm

    I agree Bas­set. Great story. It reminded me of another night in the 80s. I was work­ing at a small daily out­side Boston. A local super­mar­ket started a “sin­gles night” and we duti­fully sent a reporter and pho­tog­ra­pher. The reporter was an extremely prissy sort. And when she returned at about 9 p.m. — this was back when we worked late cov­er­ing night meet­ings — we eagerly asked her what it was like. She wrin­kled her nose and shud­dered. “It was awful,” she said. “Just awful.” About a half-hour later the pho­tog strolled in. He was a leg­endary bach­e­lor in the swing­ing 70s style — red Camaro, wide col­lars and gold chains, etc. “How was it?” I asked. “It was AWESOME,” he bel­lowed, for all the news­room to hear. “I was there 15 min­utes and I got a blowjob in the park­ing lot!”

  31. Julie Robinson said on January 2nd, 2008 at 9:27 pm

    Oh wow, no way can my story com­pare with those. We were wak­ened one July 5 by our daugh­ter, who stated “there’s some­thing naughty in the liv­ing room and I didn’t do it”. The some­thing naughty was a bul­let that some rev­eler had shot into the air, uncon­cerned about its down­ward arc, which was of course, our roof. The police said it could have come from any­where within a one-mile radius. We were just happy it was in an empty room.

  32. basset said on January 2nd, 2008 at 10:43 pm

    that pho­tog was a real char­ac­ter and well-known, as you would expect. he’d go off to shoot some­thing and just van­ish, couldn’t get him on the two-way and this was before cel phones… then come back five hours later with the bot­tom of the car cov­ered in mud and grass, that kind of thing. I hung out with him quite a bit off work and met some of his shady friends, very inter­est­ing char­ac­ters but you had to stay careful.

    the sta­tion was out on the edge of town and after the late news on week­ends we would set up bot­tles and jugs out in the side yard and shoot at them.

    the place had a long dri­ve­way and you could see any­one com­ing a long way off. one night we’re out there blast­ing away and see that same pho­tog turn­ing off the main road on his way back from a late shoot, ball game or something.

    so we crouched down behind one of the parked news cars and just as the pho­tog got out of his car one of the guys jumped up, screamed “Die, mother****er!” and let loose sev­eral rounds of twelve-gauge right over his head.

    the pho­tog man­aged to get com­pletely under a Chevy Cita­tion faster than you would think pos­si­ble, wouldn’t have believed it if I hadn’t seen it. he wasn’t too amused when he real­ized what was going on, either.

    then there was the morn­ing one of the engi­neers met me at the side door when I came in at dawn, said “Watch ‘is here!,” and man­gled a pine tree with a Mac-10 on full auto, you shoulda seen the bark fly.

    very dif­fer­ent kind of place down there.

  33. alex said on January 2nd, 2008 at 11:36 pm

    All right, it’s not about architects.

    What really chaps my ass about Fort Wayne’s crunchy cons is that they want a city that looks and feels like an urban gay neigh­bor­hood, only with­out any gays in it.

  34. basset said on January 2nd, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    bet­ter be care­ful about men­tion­ing chaps and your ass around ‘em, then.

    seri­ous ques­tion… how do you think the city should look?

  35. alex said on January 3rd, 2008 at 7:20 am

    I think there could be much bet­ter plan­ning. I would rather they had poli­cies as in other cities where a busi­ness has to exhaust all pos­si­bil­i­ties for adapt­ing exist­ing struc­tures to their pur­poses before tear­ing down and build­ing some­thing new that they’ll be aban­don­ing in a few years any­way. I would love to see more orig­i­nal­ity in com­mer­cial spaces and res­i­den­tial spaces as well, more atten­tion to scale in new build­ings to make them har­mo­nious with their sur­round­ings. This town has a long tra­di­tion of doing things half-assed and it shows.

    Yeah, I kind of jones for the neigh­bor­hoods these crunchy cons are talk­ing about, and might share their enthu­si­asm except that what they envi­sion is a reli­gious police state every bit as much as an archi­tec­tural utopia. Hav­ing come from a diverse urban neigh­bor­hood I see how wrong­headed this is. Reli­gion is a per­sonal mat­ter, kind of like din­gle­ber­ries and can­didi­a­sis, and you just don’t harp on it to others.

    Speak­ing of per­sonal mat­ters, I never forced my gay mar­riages into anyone’s face. I never asked for the state’s seal of approval. I know what I have and I don’t need val­i­da­tion from the likes of my Con­gress­man. But I’ll be damned if I stand by silently while politi­cians and dem­a­gogues and new urban­ists like the Good City guys make a polit­i­cal foot­ball out of the thing that I hold most sacred.

  36. MichaelG said on January 3rd, 2008 at 9:29 am

    Dec 31, 1968, Fort Bragg, North Car­olina. I was the duty NCO when some numb­nuts tossed a grenade from the bar­racks 3d story win­dow . “Oh, shit”, I thought, with moun­tains of paper­work danc­ing in my head. I was due to get out of the Army in two weeks and didn’t want the bother. It took a moment for it to occur to me that some­body might have got­ten hurt. Nobody did. With a spark of genius I called the Sgt of the Guard and reported a loud noise. He hot footed over and it became his prob­lem. I kind of stayed lost as much as pos­si­ble and played dumb (never dif­fi­cult for me) and man­aged to avoid the worst of the paper­work. I never did know who threw it and never cared.

    The super­mar­ket sin­gles night reminds me of the Marina Safe­way in San Fran­cisco. Sto­ries abound about the place. It has a fab­u­lous view (a super­mar­ket with a view?) and it was prob­a­bly the best looked after Safe­way in the chain since the cor­po­rate pres­i­dent and his wife shopped there. Best meat and pro­duce, new carts every few months etc., etc. Every­thing except park­ing. It was also located dead cen­ter in yup­pie sin­glesville. Wednes­day night was pick up night. It was one of those things that just hap­pened. It was never adver­tised or pro­moted, it just was. It got writ­ten about, but that was after the fact. You can’t arti­fi­cially cre­ate these kinds of things. They have to just occur nat­u­rally. The guy in Boston prob­a­bly read about the store in SF. You can check out the view on local​.live​.com at the cor­ner of Marina Blvd and Laguna.