nancynall.com » Bye.

Bye.

I have an early inter­view today, fol­lowed by a date with some dust bun­nies, so I may have to make this a bye day. (Although never under­es­ti­mate my pow­ers of pro­cras­ti­na­tion, which truly are super­hu­man.) I real­ize I could write this para­graph from here to Novem­ber and it wouldn’t make a dif­fer­ence, as the engine of this blog these days is in the com­ments, but I feel I have to make an appear­ance from time to time — open the front door, turn on the “open” sign, refill the bowls of nuts and pretzels.

I’ve taken on a few new oblig­a­tions this fall, in an effort to inject a lit­tle oxy­gen in my sad lit­tle life, and they will take some time. One is reap­ply­ing my nose to the grind­stone of learn­ing Russ­ian. Another is join­ing a great-books dis­cus­sion group (like my hero, Tim Goe­glein), which meets monthly but requires a bit more than my cus­tom­ary light read­ing of mys­ter­ies and the Wall Street Jour­nal. This week we’re cov­er­ing Tolstoy’s sec­ond epi­logue to “War and Peace,” and I need to plow through the last 15 pages today.

Geez, I sound like a whiny sopho­more, I real­ize. So let’s lighten the tone a bit with one of Anthony Lane’s great, meaty pans, a twin take­down of “Filth and Wis­dom” and “Rockan­dRolla,” the autum­nal out­put of Mr. and Mrs. Guy Ritchie. I watched a trailer for the for­mer online the other day, and thought, “That nar­ra­tor sounds just like Borat.” I think my instincts are sound here.

Back later, maybe. Any thoughts on Tolstoy?

60 responses to
“Bye.”

  1. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 9:04 am

    One is reap­ply­ing my nose to the grind­stone of learn­ing Russian

    fas­ci­nat­ing!

    Reminds me of a com­ment from Lin­coln that back when he was a boy (in Indi­ana, baby!) if a per­son could read they were con­sid­ered to be almost a wiz­ard. This same sen­ti­ment makes sense to me with regard to peo­ple who are multilingual.

    By way of say­ing, I will prob­a­bly never read Tol­stoy — but later on I can sup­ply an awkward/funny bit from the first Lincoln/Douglas debate, where Abe had a major Sarah Palin Moment. Dou­glas had sur­prised Lin­coln with an issue for which he had no ready answer (at all!) — and the rail split­ter, reel­ing, spent sev­eral min­utes spout­ing obscure legal terms that made no sense to any­one! (after that debate, Lincoln’s advi­sors all agreed he would have to step up his game, which he did!)

    Youtube woulda’ given his gar­ble inex­haustible “legs”

  2. alex said on October 14th, 2008 at 9:19 am

    Col­lege ruined Tol­stoy for me. Or maybe it was Check­hov. As you can see, I wasn’t pay­ing much attention.

    Youth really is wasted on the young.

  3. Laura said on October 14th, 2008 at 9:42 am

    I believe the work­ing title for “War and Peace” was “War: What is it Good For?”

  4. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 14th, 2008 at 9:56 am

    All i retained from my attempt to learn enough to read Dos­to­evsky were “Boje­moi!” “pjal­sta,” and “Nekul­turny,” the lat­ter i under­stand to be the ulti­mate put-down.

    That, and know­ing Pec­topah is Cyril­lic for Restaurant.

    (All spellings con­jec­tural, rooted in fee­ble mem­ory, sub­ject to review. Except restaurant…i’m pretty sure of that one.)

  5. moe99 said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:27 am

    In Van­cou­ver, BC, I met an attor­ney who was descended from a group of Russ­ian dis­si­dents, Chris­tians, who were per­se­cuted by the Tsar’s gov­ern­ment and had reset­tled in NW Canada cour­tesy of Tol­stoy who donated the prof­its from a book of his (went back and looked it up and the title is actu­ally Res­ur­rec­tion) to fund their depar­ture from Russia.

    Found this in a google search:

    http://​edocs​.lib​.sfu​.ca/​p​r​o​j​e​c​t​s​/​D​o​u​k​h​o​b​o​r​-​C​o​l​l​e​c​t​i​o​n​/​T​o​l​s​t​oy.htm

  6. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:30 am

    some inter­est­ing, indepth North Car­olina voter reg­is­tra­tion num­bers; or — for­get the “Bradley effect”, and con­sider the “com­bined Coo­zledad impact”

    http://​www​.fivethir​tyeight​.com/

    Also — for a patri­otic inter­lude, check out our 4 year old proudly recit­ing the Pledge of Alle­giance at the sup­per table last night

    http://​www​.scrap​soflife​-pam​.blogspot​.com/

  7. Howie said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:36 am

    My col­lege Russ­ian pro­fes­sor ruined Russ­ian for me. maybe if he would have let us read Tol­stoy instead of a text­book full of Russ­ian propaganda…

    Learn­ing to speak and read the Cyril­lic alpha­bet was fun, but that lasted about 5 weeks. Jeff tmmo, I don’t remem­ber your first word, but I think “pjal­sta” is “please,” and “Nekul­turny” trans­lates as “uncul­tured.” And yes, you are cor­rect about restaurant.

    Nancy, I’d offer to help, but I’ve already shared 20% of what I retained!

  8. LAMary said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:52 am

    Laura
    Absolutely nuthin.
    Say it again.

  9. Jeff Borden said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:57 am

    A NN.C READER SEEKS HELP FROM BRAINY NN.C AUDIENCE

    I teach broad­cast news at Loy­ola in Chicago –it’s a sur­vey class so there are plenty of non-journalism majors– and today we’re set to do an exer­cise in inter­view­ing. Basi­cally, we’ll be pair­ing off and hav­ing each stu­dent inter­view the other for, say, 10 or 15 min­utes, then write a brief report. This pre­cedes an out-of-classroom inter­view for next week.

    In the past, I’ve asked the stu­dents to inter­view their peers on sub­jects like why they chose Loy­ola or their career aspi­ra­tions or thei fam­ily back­grounds. These tend to pro­duce work­man­like but deadly dull interviews.

    Can you folks help me come up with a cou­ple of inter­view ques­tions that would really go to the hearts of a group of bright, diverse young adults? I want them to enjoy the expe­ri­ence but to learn some­thing from it, too.

    Any and all help is wel­come. Thanks!

  10. LAMary said on October 14th, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Jeff B
    I inter­view peo­ple all day for employ­ment, not jour­nal­ism. I work in a hos­pi­tal, so I’m look­ing for the car­ing side of folks. The ques­tion that has pro­duced the most inter­est­ing responses for me is, “Tell me a time when you did a lot more than you had to for some­one.” I don’t know if this can be trans­lated into what you’re doing. It can pro­duce very mun­dane answers, but it can also pro­duce answers that are remark­able. I’ve had to work hard to not cry at some of the answers I’ve gotten.

  11. Jeff Borden said on October 14th, 2008 at 11:09 am

    Thanks, Mary. That’s a great one.

  12. michaela said on October 14th, 2008 at 11:10 am

    Jeff, I’ve worked with a docu-studies pro­gram that sends our fledg­ling doc­u­men­tar­i­ans out to do vox pop inter­views on the main street of our small city. We’ve had suc­cess with ques­tions like, “What’s in your pock­ets? Why?” or “What do you remem­ber about your first kiss?” or “What did you dream about last night?”

    Granted, these are not news-gathering pieces… but at least they get peo­ple talking.

  13. Jolene said on October 14th, 2008 at 11:32 am

    Brian, the Pledge of Alle­giance clip is adorable.

    Inter­est­ing that you thought of ask­ing about first kisses, michael. I was think­ing about that too. Also thought of first sex­ual expe­ri­ence, but that might go a bit far for a class­room expe­ri­ence, and not every­one remem­bers them fondly.

    Seem like I should be able to think of other ideas, but the only thing that comes to mind is some­thing hav­ing to do with “dis­as­ters”. Cook­ing dis­as­ters, weather dis­as­ters, auto­mo­tive dis­as­ters. Also fan­tasies: fan­tasy dates, fan­tasy careers, fan­tasy homes, fan­tasy travels.

    Or, you could try, “Tell me some­thing that you do bet­ter than most other peo­ple.” Could lead to fur­ther ques­tions about how the inter­vie­wee acquired the skill, demon­stra­tions of it, etc.

  14. Jeff Borden said on October 14th, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Thanks. These are all very helpful.

  15. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 11:53 am

    Jeff — I’d ask “name a book or movie that seared your world­view” and dis­cuss what imagery or detail really sealed the deal…

    and the ques­tion could be widened to include the flat-out fun­ni­est or most mem­o­rably absurd thing they saw or read…but the nub of the ques­tion would remain “why?”

  16. WhiteBeard said on October 14th, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Some inter­view ques­tions pop up in my mind.
    What was the first story you wrote?
    What was the expe­ri­ence in your life that gave more than it took?
    Who was your biggest influ­ence in your career choice?
    What is the most money you made in a sum­mer? Why? Where?

  17. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Describe a time when your mind changed.

  18. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    Describe a time when your mind changed

    2005, Kat­rina, Amer­i­cans wait­ing in an orderly fash­ion at a con­ven­tion cen­ter at a dev­as­tated major US city, for help that did not come after two days, and then three, and then four, and then five

    “pol­i­tics” switched from being a petty term about ‘my guys’ ver­sus ‘your guys’ and became (to me) much more clearly impor­tant and pertinent…and in need of re-examination and modification

  19. Dorothy said on October 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Wow you guys are com­ing up with great ques­tions. I think some day if Madam Telling Tales is lack­ing ideas (and those days are few and far between), she could plug in a cou­ple of those ques­tions and we’d be busy all day and the next answer­ing them, and read­ing them to find out even MORE about each other!

    p.s. to Mary & Laura: Don­cha just love Edwin Starr??!??!

  20. Laura said on October 14th, 2008 at 12:56 pm

    Mary/Dorothy:

    Good God, y’all

  21. Jolene said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

    How did a ref­er­ence to Edwin Starr arise from this conversation?

  22. Laura said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    I made a bad Tol­stoy joke (lifted from Sein­feld, btw).

  23. Peter said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    Jolene — that was a Sein­feld ref­er­ence — back when Elaine was work­ing at Pen­dant Pub­lish­ing one of her jobs was escort­ing a big shot Russ­ian author around, and she said that to break the ice. I can’t remem­ber who gave her that com­ment — I think it was Kramer.

    ON ANOTHER MATTER, I’m sorry I was out the last few days and missed the Andy Mar­tin talk. I think Andy was for­merly known as Anthony Mar­tin Trigg­ona, and I thought he ran for sen­a­tor on the demo­c­ra­tic ticket (or am I con­fus­ing him with Alex Seith?) In any case, this guy’s nut­ti­ness is LaRouchian.

    And speak­ing of LaRouche, where’s the infomer­cial? For some­one my age, it isn’t Elec­tion Day until one of those aired — kind of like the old Norelco com­mer­cials told you that Christ­mas was finally around the corner.

  24. Kirk said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    “Float­ing heads, float­ing heads … ”

  25. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    How did a ref­er­ence to Edwin Starr arise from this conversation?

    the pro­gres­sion was thus: the pro­pri­etress said Any thoughts on Tol­stoy?; Laura quipped that the work­ing title of Tolstoy’s mag­num opus was “War: What is it Good For?”; Mary imme­di­ately picked up and enhanced the bon mot with “Absolutely nuthin. Say it again.”; Dorothy said what I was think­ing, about the Motown guy who made that song; and Laura car­ried it over the goal line with “Good God, y’all”.

    and there you have it — 5 degrees of seper­a­tion between Leo Tol­stoy and Motown

  26. Jolene said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    Thanks for the expla­na­tion. Am not sure how it is that I largely missed Sein­feld. I know the char­ac­ters, of course, and the gist of the show, but never really fol­lowed it, so don’t know about spe­cific episodes and lines.

    And yes, Peter, Andy Mar­tin is Anthony Mar­tin Trig­ona. I posted a link to a review of the recent Sean Han­nity show on which he appeared at the end of a pre­vi­ous thread. He does, indeed, sound like a totally clue­less goof­ball. And yet, Sean Han­nity has become a rich man pre­sent­ing such nonsense.

  27. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    Gold stan­dard! The Queen of Eng­land sell­ing heroin through her evil tools, The Bea­t­les! Direct democ­racy, except when elite edi­tors shall con­trol all! The peo­ple will reveal the Zion­ist con­spir­acy in Chris­t­ian pop­u­lar music for the evil worm in the apple of clas­si­cal sym­phonic art that it is, once every­one lis­tens to the Bach B-minor mass in manda­tory arts re-education classes to be orga­nized voluntarily!

    (Did i men­tion the gold standard?)

    Oh — Bilder­berg­ers, Bilder­berg­ers, Bilderbergers!

    http://​www​.wash​ing​ton​monthly​.com/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​s​/​2​0​0​7​/​0​7​1​1​.​k​l​e​i​n.html

    [Peter, you should feel bet­ter now; but that’s all you’ll get. Lyn­don ain’t run­ning this year — first time in over three decades. YouTube has the Noelco Santa ads in b/w and color, so we’re good to head right through to Nov. 5.]

  28. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    to judge by Uncle Rush and crazy cousin Sean (lov­ingly known as “sh*t-for-brains-Sean”), they are now look­ing past the immi­nent defeat of their national can­di­dates (and the mas­sive col­lat­eral dam­age to their con­gres­sional contingent) — and busily sewing the seeds for an inces­santly whiney cam­paign of post-election recrim­i­na­tions against cheaters and frauds all across the country!

    ‘Course, the prob­lem with think­ing that the evil Democ­rats are sim­ply going to steal the elec­tion on Novem­ber 4, is that you also have to believe that every polling firm in the coun­try is “in” on the con­spir­acy, here and now in October!!

    I’m wait­ing for them to cite the LACK of a “Bradley effect” as PROOF that Obama stole the elec­tion — because those whiteys in PA and IN and OH and WV sim­ply could not pos­si­bly have ever voted for the black man!!

  29. Connie said on October 14th, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    Dosvedanya tovar­itch. Good bye com­rade. Two semes­ters, that’s about what remains.

  30. Dorothy said on October 14th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

    Jolene I’m in the same boat as you re Sein­feld. I used to work Thurs­day evenings at the quilt store and really never watched it. If i was home, I was prob­a­bly putting my kids to bed or some such thing. Any show that was on between 9:00 PM and 10:00 PM I never saw for a few years.

    And if Laura and Mary had not already started the veiled ref­er­ences to Edwin Starr, I would have explained that in my fam­ily they are called “Dorothy Tan­gents.” My daugh­ter calls them that — it’s because I’m famous for mak­ing u-turns in con­ver­sa­tions and steer­ing them into com­pletely oppo­site direc­tions. Ask any­one who knows me.

    Who wants to go see the movie “Rachel Get­ting Mar­ried” with me? (see — a DT right there)

  31. Jolene said on October 14th, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    “Rachel” got a great review on CBS Sun­day Morn­ing, Dorothy. But you’re in Cal­i­for­nia, right? Lit­tle far for me to drive to see a movie.

  32. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    I never watched Sein­feld when it was new; but the tbs reruns make me laugh and laugh. Same story for Every­body Loves Raymond.

    I’m think­ing W will hit the dol­lar movie house right after the elec­tion, and I think I’ll catch it then

  33. Catherine said on October 14th, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    Jeff, that link was… astound­ing? fas­ci­nat­ing? hor­ri­fy­ing? I’m not sure of the word.

    I guess even being raised Quaker is no pro­tec­tion from grow­ing into a whackjob.

  34. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    And ya know, if the Soci­ety of Friends can’t pro­tect you from moon­bat­tery, then … seri­ously, if Lyn­don LaRouche isn’t mas­sively bipo­lar (and off his lithium) with episodes of psy­chotic grandeur and para­noid ten­den­cies, then i haven’t spent time sit­ting around in the break room across the table from clinicians.

    Oh, and dri­ving across town (not at lunch) it sud­denly came to me — Naz­drovyeh! A most use­ful phrase, but is it in Tolstoy?

  35. caliban said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    A great Tejas dou­ble fea­ture for free on Hulu:

    http://​www​.hulu​.com/​movies

    Iraq wasn’t the only vic­tim of obscenely cyn­i­cal inva­sion and irre­spon­si­ble indif­fer­ence to the dam­age of occu­pa­tion. But, sure as hell, there’s an exit strat­egy for Crawford.

  36. LAMary said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:38 pm

    Dorothy is not here in the land of brush­fires. She’s in Ohio, land of the, um, Ohioans.

  37. brian stouder said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:40 pm

    aka ‘buck­eye’

  38. Catherine said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    Ohio, where they have a sea­son called fall. In CA we are think­ing of chang­ing the name to “brush­fire.” Fol­lowed by mudslide.

  39. Hattie said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    Par­don my grumpi­tude, but there hasn’t been a good movie reviewer since Pauline Kael died.

  40. caliban said on October 14th, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    So, one of McCain’s keep­ers was in bed for cash with Sad­dam between the father and son Iraqi expeditions:

    http://​nl​.huff​in​g​ton​post​.com/​l​i​n​k​.​p​h​p​?​M​=​1​4​1​6​2​6​&​a​m​p​;​N​=​7​2​4​&​a​m​p​;​L=3529

    This would be shock­ing if there hadn’t been strong evi­dence for years, which Dick­less Cheney and Rummy were too con­temp­tu­ous of Amer­i­can cit­i­zens to be both­ered withh deny­ing, that the das­tardly duo could see Iraq from their back­yards and were pulling the same crap.

    Sure put’s a crimp in Ms. Alaska Independence’s all-Ayres strat­egy. And now what’ McOld­Fart sup­posed to talk about at the debate?

  41. LAMary said on October 14th, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    Hat­tie, the WSJ guy is pretty good.

  42. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 14th, 2008 at 5:19 pm

    What about Joe Bob Briggs’ Drive-In Movie reviewing?

    http://​www​.joe​bob​briggs​.com/​r​e​v​i​ew.asp

    Who, it must be noted here, con­tributed an audio com­men­tary to the DVD release of “The Incred­i­bly Strange Crea­tures Who Stopped Liv­ing and Became Mixed-Up Zombies.”

    As his real life per­sona, John Bloom, he wrote a great cover arti­cle on Benny Hinn for the mag/website he’s “Door­keeper” for, http://​www​.wit​ten​burgdoor​.com — worth a look.

  43. Dorothy said on October 14th, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    I am a Pitts­burgher, first, fore­most and pri­mar­ily. I just hap­pen to live in Ohio. I will NEVER be a buckeye.

  44. Kirk said on October 14th, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    I was born and raised in Ohio and, except for 3 1/2 years as a stu­dent in Mis­souri, have lived here all my life. But please call me any­thing but a Buckeye.

  45. Jolene said on October 14th, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    Pitts­burgh! My next-most-recent home. I loved it there too, although I can’t say I long to go back. I live in DC (well, actu­ally North­ern Vir­ginia), so we could almost meet there for a movie.

    Jeff, your friend Joe Bob needs some guid­ance on site design. That light green type is very hard to read.

  46. MichaelG said on October 14th, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Many, many years ago when I was in the army, a cou­ple of us were dri­ving through Ohio. We stopped at some road­side joint for a burger and ordered beer to drink. It was 11:45 PM on a Sun­day and the guy told us he couldn’t serve beer because it was Sun­day. We just had water. A lit­tle while later the guy came back, announced that it was now Mon­day and asked if we still wanted beer. Blue laws are wonderful.

  47. moe99 said on October 14th, 2008 at 7:56 pm

    On a lighter note, “Yes we Carve.” Obama related pump­kin carv­ing for Halloween.

    http://​yeswe​carve​.com/​i​n​d​ex.php

  48. Jim said on October 14th, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Jolene, I’m back in north­ern Vir­ginia — a recent re-transplant. I’m in Alexandria.

  49. alex said on October 14th, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    Bet nobody’d bother with a McCain jack-o-lantern. Or Palin. Now that would be scary, come to think of it. Maybe bet­ter to do it with a bell pep­per, though, to cap­ture those drawn cheeks. Smudge some bronze on them too, the way she does.

  50. beb said on October 14th, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    “Blue laws are wonderful.”

    My brother bought a bunch of Irish folk albums back in the 60s. One of them had the delight­ful line “Hark, I hear the Tem­ple Bells; they’ll all be open now.” Which I always assumed ref­ered to Irish tav­ern hours.

  51. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:08 pm

    That’s not bronze on her cheeks; it’s the salt of the earth, infused with the rosy glow of a Last Fron­tier sunset.

    But i can see where you’d be confused.

  52. Jolene said on October 14th, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    I’m in Alexan­dria too, Jim. Guess it’s the place to be.

  53. Dexter said on October 15th, 2008 at 1:20 am

    Obama is here in Ohio, holed up about 90 min­utes from me, prepar­ing for the debate . He’s spend­ing the night on the shores of Lake Erie, near Toledo.

  54. brian stouder said on October 15th, 2008 at 8:27 am

    So, I was zip­ping along, skim­ming fivethir​tyeight​.com, and tripped over this pas­sage. Re-reading it more care­fully, I still don’t ‘get’ what he’s say­ing — but maybe one of y’all can help me…

    It is imper­a­tive that McCain does not just draw tomor­row night’s debate, does not just win a vic­tory on points, but emerges with a resound­ing vic­tory, the sort that leaves the spin room gasp­ing for air. Fail­ing that, we are get­ting into dead girl, live boy territory.

    “dead girl, live boy ter­ri­tory”? What? Maybe I’m just dirty-minded, but other than necrophilia, what could this mean?

    And even if this IS a such an utterly crude ref­er­ence, I’m still not sure I fol­low the anal­ogy, unless the ‘dead girl’ is McCain’s pres­i­den­tial hopes, while the ‘live boy’ is McCain.…..

    or maybe I’m hope­lessly onto the wrong track.

  55. nancy said on October 15th, 2008 at 8:35 am

    It’s an old saw of pol­i­tics, usu­ally attrib­uted to Edwin Edwards: “The only way I can lose this elec­tion is if I’m caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.”

    I can’t believe some­one as keenly inter­ested in pol­i­tics never heard it before, Brian — it’s one of those “bucket of warm spit” quotes that gets trot­ted out every few months — but I guess everyone’s knowl­edge base has a few black holes.

  56. Kirk said on October 15th, 2008 at 8:47 am

    Edwin Edwards being a noted thief and slime­ball in the best tra­di­tions of Louisiana, he prob­a­bly stole it from some­one else.

  57. brian stouder said on October 15th, 2008 at 8:50 am

    Hah!! I’ve seen that quip before, but (as is now obvi­ous!) the quoted pas­sage cer­tainly didn’t bring it to mind!

    So look­ing back, the pas­sage makes an implied leap from McCain’s poor prospects, to Obama’s “dead girl/live boy” prospects.

    THIS sort of per­cep­tive­ness is why Nance is the Proprietress

    (btw — I was also shat­tered to see that the Ritchies, whose artis­tic film-making was high­lighted here at nn.c yes­ter­day, are divorc­ing; ruined my whole morn­ing, more or less)

  58. LAMary said on October 15th, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Edwin Edwards took a bunch of his friends who con­tributed to one of his cam­paigns on a trip to France, fin­ish­ing off with a ban­quet at Ver­sailles. His com­ment on the food was, “No doubt about it, them frogs flat know how to cater.”

  59. basset said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    reminds me of a com­ment attrib­uted to Gov­er­nor “Big Jim” Fol­som of Alabama some years ago, a man who was alleged to take a sip now and again… the way I heard it, he was on the review­ing stand at an air show on Mobile Bay when a National Guard jet went into the water full-speed, mas­sive crash, spray and fire everywhere…

    “Well, kiss my ass if that ain’t a show.”

  60. Deborah said on October 15th, 2008 at 10:49 pm

    I am so dis­ap­pointed in the e-community. I’m here in Abiquiu, New Mex­ico, no way to watch the debates live. I tried to skip around live blog­gers and get the scoop, but it was pathetic try­ing to get the gist of it. This medium has a long way to go before it works for peo­ple who do not have access to cable or broad­cast news. Sad but true.