nancynall.com » Minor-key Monday.

Minor-key Monday.

With the post-election after­glow quickly cur­dling into the usual nas­ti­ness, let me state a few things for the record today:

I think Sarah Palin knows Africa is a con­ti­nent, not a coun­try. Given that the lady is one of those peo­ple whose words, ver­bally, tend to become — I think in terms of the ver­bal expres­sion, you know, she could be express­ing, word-wise…

You get the idea. Also, I’ve heard many, many peo­ple refer to Africa as a coun­try, and I know they know bet­ter. It’s just one of those things.

The NAFTA thing, I could go either way on. And I believe every word about the clothes and the shop­ping. I can’t say how, except that I’ve seen oth­er­wise sen­si­ble peo­ple make utter fools of them­selves when they thought some­thing was free. This is all I have to go on — a few hunches.

Also, I think the McCain we saw at his con­ces­sion speech was the real man, and his fail­ure to be that man through­out his cam­paign is one of those Greek-tragedy things he’ll carry to his grave.

We’re reach­ing the end of my gra­cious­ness toward Amer­i­can con­ser­vatism, but I’ll hang on a lit­tle longer, to say this P.J. O’Rourke piece is worth a read. Every­body likes funny Patrick Jake, although some like him bet­ter than oth­ers, and this piece has the advan­tage of at least sound­ing honest:

Since the early 1980s I’ve been present at the con­cep­tion (to use the polite term) of many of our for­eign pol­icy ini­tia­tives. Iran-contra was about as smart as using the U.S. Postal Ser­vice to get weapons to anti-Communists. And I notice Danny Ortega is back in power any­way. I had a look into the eyes of the future rulers of Afghanistan at a sura in Peshawar as the Sovi­ets were with­draw­ing from Kabul. I would rather have had a beer with Leonid Brezhnev.

Fall of the Berlin wall? Being there was fun. Nations that flaked off of the Soviet Union in south­east­ern Europe, Cen­tral Asia, and the Cau­ca­sus? Being there was not so fun.

The after­math of the Gulf war still makes me sick. Fine to save the fat, greedy Kuwaitis and the arro­gant, grasp­ing house of Saud, but to hell with the Shi­ites and Kurds of Iraq until they get some oil.

Then, half a gen­er­a­tion later, when we returned with our armies, we expected to be greeted as lib­er­a­tors. And, damn it, we were. I was in Bagh­dad in April 2003. Peo­ple were glad to see us, until they noticed that we’d for­got­ten to bring along any per­son­nel or pro­vi­sions to feed or doc­tor the sur­vivors of shock and awe or to get their elec­tric­ity and water run­ning again. After that they got huffy and began stuff­ing dyna­mite down their pants before con­sult­ing with the occu­py­ing forces.

Is there a moral dimen­sion to for­eign pol­icy in our polit­i­cal phi­los­o­phy? Or do we just exist to help the world’s rich peo­ple make and keep their money? (And a fine job we’ve been doing of that lately.)

I haven’t always kept cur­rent on the O’Rourke cat­a­log, but I assume some­one here has; did he ever write this stuff at the time it was hap­pen­ing? If so, I don’t recall any of it, but maybe this is just his niche — truth-telling long after the fact, kind of like David Horowitz on the Pan­thers. What­ever. At least someone’s try­ing hon­esty for a change. Strate­gic hon­esty, any­way — there’s the usual abuse aimed at “lib­er­als,” but I guess if there wasn’t at least a lit­tle bit of that, it wouldn’t be a Weekly Stan­dard piece.

And so begins the new era, and while I’m opti­mistic and hope­ful, I’m not stu­pid, either. If you want to know what an abyss looks like, look at an abyss, so over the week­end I con­tem­plated what might hap­pen to this town if Gen­eral Motors, et al, filed for bank­ruptcy. Our house, already worth tens of thou­sands less than we paid for it, would fall fur­ther in value. One of the papers would prob­a­bly fold, and it would likely be the one my health insur­ance is tied to. The free­lance mar­ket would either dry up or become so com­pet­i­tive, what with all the unem­ployed jour­nal­ists on the mar­ket, that it wouldn’t pay worth a damn. When I was in col­lege, a nearby power-plant cool­ing tower — one of those wasp-waisted struc­tures you see in the non-picturesque parts of the coun­try, and in Indi­ana, prac­ti­cally on the lovely sandy beach of Lake Michi­gan, and whose idea was that — col­lapsed while under con­struc­tion. The work­ers, under pres­sure to make a dead­line, had anchored their safety har­nesses in cement that wasn’t fully set. The line gave way at one end, and took down a cou­ple dozen work­ers in a motion not unlike water going down a drain.

It would be like that.

Still, we had din­ner with friends Sat­ur­day night, and we all had a cham­pagne toast to the new era. Some­day we’ll look back on it and say, either, we should have saved those few dol­lars we spent on cham­pagne or else, hey, at least we have our mem­o­ries.

Hard times are hard times, but act­ing as though they’re harder than they are can make them worse. This is com­mon sense. Rod Dreher is on one of his pants-wetting jags about “stock­pil­ing food.” I may well lose my health insur­ance, my job and my house, but stay­ing fed has never seemed much of a risk, not in this coun­try. By the time the food runs out, most of your stock­piles will have been depleted too, so why bother try­ing to keep the mice out of the 50-pound bags of rice in the base­ment? Now that we have firearms in the house, I plan to feed us dur­ing a Depres­sion the old-fashioned way — by killing and eat­ing the neigh­bors’ pets.

Dreher goes on to quote some lady at his church: “The news­pa­pers ought to be telling us how to pre­pare, but instead they talk about noth­ing but sports and enter­tain­ment and every­thing like it is nor­mal,” she said. “It’s not going to be nor­mal.” No, I don’t expect it’ll be nor­mal, but run­ning sto­ries about how to make your own pem­mi­can and squir­rel jerky isn’t going to set well with the few adver­tis­ers you still have left, who are try­ing to sell wide-screen TVs and elec­tric skillets.

There’s a lot of automotive-buyout money float­ing around town now, and I think it’s behind a lot of small busi­nesses that are pop­ping up in the odd­est places. Two are on the com­mer­cial block near­est our house. One I sus­pect is doomed; there just can’t pos­si­bly be that much demand for a dog wash, aimed at that slice of the pop­u­la­tion that has a dog to bathe but doesn’t want to do it in their own tub. The other is a fast-casual restau­rant called the Big Salad, which amuses me because I remem­ber the “Sein­feld” episode where they got the name, and pleases me because they make a pretty good salad there. I try to stop in every week or two, if only because it’s good to get out of the house and with­out cus­tomers, the let­tuce will wilt and there will be no more Big Salad on the block. Per­haps Dreher and his old-lady friend, eyes squinched shut in fer­vent prayer, haven’t thought of this.

Any­way, I’m sick of cur­rent events, and plan to be for a while. You guys talk amongst your­selves about what­ever you like, but I’m going to turn my thoughts to art and Christ­mas shop­ping. Or that might just be the weather talk­ing — snow is fly­ing out­side my win­dow as I write this. Seems like a good time to study Russ­ian instead of polling data, and for a good long while.

(This is also, I warn you, the “my web­site is a tar baby” spasm of dis­gust I go through from time to time. I can’t think of the last time I got a nickel from Goog­leAds, those chis­el­ers. Roy Edroso details the unin­ten­tion­ally hilar­i­ous goodbye-to-all-that of a one-time high-flying right-wing blog­ger, his finances destroyed by hours spent at the key­board, along with gout and the expenses of “lap-band surgery,” for both the blog­ger and his daugh­ter (so she could make the weight require­ment for mil­i­tary enlist­ment). I was so embar­rassed for him, read­ing this, that I had to look away for a while. I don’t want to be that guy. But I would like to write some other stuff. So I may redi­rect my time for a while.)

Any­way, I think Brian Dick­er­son, eas­ily the best remain­ing colum­nist at the Freep, sums it up well:

The wild-eyed Marx­ist rev­o­lu­tion­ary known as Barack Obama con­vened the first meet­ing of his eco­nomic advi­sory board Fri­day. Besides Michigan’s own Gov. Jen­nifer Granholm, those invited to par­tic­i­pate included two for­mer sec­re­taries of the U.S. Trea­sury Depart­ment, for­mer Fed­eral Reserve Chair­man Paul Volker, and über-capitalist War­ren Buf­fett. If this strikes you as an unlikely group to task with the rad­i­cal redis­tri­b­u­tion of America’s wealth, you’ve stum­bled upon the not-so-dirty lit­tle secret of Amer­i­can gov­ern­ment, which is its frus­trat­ing (and enor­mously reas­sur­ing) continuity.

Not that any of this has occurred to yet another Hoosier ass­hole pick­ing up on the fly-the-flag-upside-down meme, tac­itly approved of by the news­pa­per colum­nist who detailed it. Get this guy to a Boy Scout, stat.

Off to the gym. Mon­day. Sigh.

59 responses to
“Minor-key Monday.”

  1. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:08 am

    Hey, i’m between com­put­ers on a semi-computer, and can’t find it fast, but your fel­low OU alum (or did he ever grad­u­ate? or did he just party and live in a house near Athens? i can’t think on a Mon­day) P.J. O’Rourke has been treated for rec­tal can­cer, and got a both hilar­i­ous and touch­ing col­umn for the LA Times out of it.

    Like him or not, worth the read (we may all get rec­tal can­cer some­day, or at least be checked for it) — can some­one find the link? Grazie.

  2. Nancy Friedman said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:11 am

    When I read about Palin’s Africa mixup I was reminded of a post-Olympics col­umn by Tom [no rela­tion] Fried­man, in which he referred to “the African team”: http://​is​.gd/6TEu

    Sigh.

  3. jcburns said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:19 am

    I think we have P.J. Bed­narski (Chicago media columnist/editor), and Miami Uni­ver­sity (of Ohio) gets P.J. O’Rourke.

    But we also can proudly (?) point in the gen­eral direc­tion of Clarence Page, Rudy Maxa, and that pin­na­cle of jour­nal­is­tic ethics, Joe Eszterhas.

    And Nancy.

  4. Connie said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Hey, the coy­ote pic showed up in Fort Wayne Observed.

    And yes for those who asked, my kid was fine once she was rehy­drated, though still feel­ing some­what flu ridden.

  5. brian stouder said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:43 am

    When I was in col­lege, a nearby power-plant cool­ing tower…collapsed while under construction.

    Here in the Fort, near where I-69 and US-24 come together, there is an Indi­ana State Police post, and a nice lit­tle southwestern-style restau­rant, and a hotel. The skele­ton of a brand new, 7-story high hotel is also going in, but work stopped because.… it has begun to leeeeeeean — 

    an excerpt from chan­nel 15’s cached arti­cle on it (which I can­not link) — regarding the nice lit­tle southwestern-style restaurant:

    Cars are few in the park­ing lot of Antigua Mex­i­can Bar & Grill. Inside, the lunch crowd is sparse. The major­ity of seats are un-warmed and numer­ous menus are untouched. “Even­tu­ally, we assumed it would ben­e­fit our busi­ness, once con­struc­tion fin­ished,” says Antigua Assis­tant Man­ager, Ernesto Leon of the project. “But it doesn’t look like it’s going to be fin­ished any­time soon.”

  6. Linda said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:04 am

    In a way, the col­umn is a typ­i­cal P.J. O’Rourke piece. He admits con­ser­v­a­tives do stu­pid things, but con­ser­v­a­tivism ™ is itself never wrong or bad, only its advo­cates are. Ide­ol­ogy doesn’t get any purer than that.

  7. Gasman said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:17 am

    I am mys­ti­fied by the reac­tions of the Rod Dreher set. I can under­stand them being freaked out by their per­cep­tion of dire things to come from a per­ceived social­ist, but they are behav­ing as if their apoc­a­lyp­tic visions have already happened.

    Fort Wayne’s can­di­date for National Moron du Jour, Jef­fery Smith, the sec­ond rabid Repub­li­can to show dis­re­spect toward the flag by fly­ing it inap­pro­pri­ately, sounds like he is blam­ing Obama for our cur­rent eco­nomic woes.

    Their seem­ingly absolute dis­con­nect from the real world is what I find hard to fathom. They’ve need­lessly worked them­selves up in a lather over what? What will they do if things get unde­ni­ably bet­ter? Whom will they credit? Bet­ter yet, will they even acknowl­edge pos­i­tive change? My guess is not.

    I keep com­ing back to race. I can’t help but feel that the extremely irra­tional response only makes sense when you look at Obama’s skin color. Obama has done not a sin­gle thing as pres­i­dent, yet these folks have got­ten angrier at Obama for doing noth­ing than they did at Bush for doing way too much. When you’ve got Drs. freak­ing out because “our busi­ness will never again expand,” how do we respond?

    They’ve donned their hair­shirts and busy them­selves with para­noid navel gaz­ing. They are worth nei­ther time nor breath in engag­ing in debate. You can’t argue with logic like that. I am afraid, how­ever, of their poten­tial for incit­ing vio­lence, because that seems to be the only step left beyond their fever­ish rhetoric.

  8. alex said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:29 am

    Not only did the coy­ote pic show up on Fort Wayne Observed, but the box of pup­pies showed up on Angry White Boy. The Repub­li­cans really are out of ideas.

  9. Dwight said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:29 am

    Dur­ing debate prep, Palin asked her han­dlers for a point of clar­i­fi­ca­tion on which– if any — CAFTA coun­tries over­lap with NAFTA countries.

    The Africa quote that spewed out in debate prep is, “Africa is a coun­try with a lot of problems.”

    Source: Bill “hard worm” Kris­tol, Fox News Sun­day, Nov 9, 2008

    McCain’s smear mer­chants sell­ing minor gaffes as stu­pid­ity know well the minds of the bumper-sticker atten­tion span lib­er­als who will run with this for years, long after the truth is known. Just like ninety-five per­cent of the com­menters here still believe that the story about GHWB not rec­og­niz­ing a gro­cery store scan­ner is true, despite the fact the reporter who wrote the story later admit­ted it was no ordi­nary gro­cery scan­ner, but rather an RF scan­ner that could price an entire cart of gro­ceries at once.

    Y’all decry repub­li­can “fear-mongering” but you have no issues at all with the patented lib­eral “dufus-ifcation” of those whose val­ues you fear: Dubya, O’Reilly, Quale, GHWB, Rea­gan, Ford, Eisen­hower. Now Palin.

    Yawn. All you did was make her more pre­pared for 12. Reagan’s first pri­mary defeat did the same thing.

  10. Gasman said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:51 am

    Dwight,
    Yep, NN​.com is a hotbed of oppo­si­tion to Eisen­hower. Us lib­er­als just can’t get over him.

    I actu­ally think that you’re headed in the right direc­tion with the NAFTA and Africa com­ments, at least I hope so. But, as a con­ser­v­a­tive, what is your take on why the McCain camp is going after Palin harder than lib­er­als did? It seems to make lit­tle sense. What could they gain?

  11. brian stouder said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:55 am

    “dufus-ifcation” of those whose val­ues you fear:Dubya, O’Reilly, Quale, GHWB, Rea­gan, Ford, Eisen­hower. Now Palin.

    dubya — let’s skip him for now

    O’Reilly — DUFUS!

    Quayle — agreed (that he was unfairly “dufusified”), although he wasn’t ready for the bright lights, and GHWB SHOULD have picked Jack Kemp that year, but we digress

    GHWB — DUFUS! I voted for him three times — if you count the pri­mary vote where I sup­ported him over the even­tual nom­i­nee in 1980, plus the 1988 pri­mary and gen­eral election.…but he made me FIRING mad when he switched from “Read my lips” to his go-to-hell “Read my hips” dis­missal of ques­tions about his out­right LIE about not rais­ing taxes, as he jogged away

    Rea­gan — Your claim is dis­missed from court. Sean Wilentz (who ain’t no right-wing Human Events/Weekly Stan­dard hack) has writ­ten a book about RWR that I intend to buy; my under­stand­ing is that the book pays seri­ous respect to RWR’s clear-sighted, upward look­ing presidency.

    Ford — agreed, he was badly treated. In 1976, in the wake of Water­gate and his par­don of the dis­graced pres­i­dent, and the igno­min­ious end of the Viet­nam War, and the onset of the killing fields of Cam­bo­dia, and our reces­sion and gen­eral down-turn — the odds were stacked against him in any case…and still, he made it pretty close

    Eisen­hower — what? Folks back in the day might have had a car­i­ca­ture of him in mind, but he did get us out of Harry Truman’s dis­as­ter­ously mis­han­dled war, and kept us out of new wars, and whacked Joe McCarthy off of the national stage, and presided over boom times, and was gen­er­ally revered as the iconic hero that he was.

    Palin — first — I agree with the pro­pri­etress; Palin’s no pushover. But your inclu­sion of her is some­what odd, unless you mean to say that the right-wing goon squad that has been attempt­ing to “dufus-ify” her is guilty of infring­ing the ‘patent’ on the ‘dufis-ification’ process

  12. Connie said on November 10th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    The thought of the box of pup­pies on Angry White Boy has started a seri­ous cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance prob­lem in my brain.

  13. Peter said on November 10th, 2008 at 12:16 pm

    Nancy — that dog wash may do bet­ter than you think.

    In Chicago we have a few of them — I fre­quent a place called Soggy Paws and they’re con­stantly booked — so much so that less than a mile away there’s a wor­thy com­peti­tor called the Bark Bark Club.

    I have an over­sized Gold­en­doo­dle (That’s right Obama, you want one of these and you know it) and when Cop­per has had fun at the beach or the muddy for­est pre­serve, if I don’t wash him there he will trash the house. Even wash­ing him between cuts is a dis­as­ter — he’ll gladly jump in the tub, but he goes into hyper­auto­matic shake­down when he gets out and I get a few rooms with dog­wa­ter spray until he calms down.

    And of course I could wash him out­side but he instinc­tively stays 50′ away from any hose unless he’s thirsty.

  14. LA Mary said on November 10th, 2008 at 12:30 pm

    Other than ask­ing my rel­a­tives in dis­tant parts of the coun­try if we could maybe tone down the whole Christ­mas thing and all spend a lit­tle less, and mess­ing around a bit with my 403b so I don’t lose a third of it again, I’ve not done much other than brace myself for the pos­si­bil­ity that the ex will lose his job and won’t send us our check each month.
    I think my job is pretty secure. Oth­ers in my depart­ment, not so much. I’m paid the least and I pro­duce the most, and I’ve been there the longest. All good rea­sons to keep me on and to lose the pair of gig­glers who make 25 per­cent more than I do and pro­duce, lit­er­ally, one sixth of what I pro­duce.
    I think my sur­vival skills are strong. And I know where the bod­ies are buried.
    What I want to know is: when did you stop being a trou­bled teen, Dwight?

  15. alex said on November 10th, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    My fave DIY dog-grooming place in Chicago had a big poster of a dal­ma­t­ian lick­ing its balls. The cap­tion: Self-service clean­ing isn’t exactly a new idea.

  16. James said on November 10th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    John:

    I know Wikipedia dis­agrees with me, but I was sure that P. J. O’Rourke went to your in-law’s alma mater, that hotbed of hip­py­dom in Ohio, Anti­och College.

    At least, his early sto­ries talked about going there… Maybe he never grad­u­ated, or changed schools.

  17. LA Mary said on November 10th, 2008 at 1:03 pm

    Con­nie might not agree with me, but hav­ing a Frisian grand­mother pre­pares one for eco­nomic down­turns. I can’t imag­ine not wash­ing my own dogs. I’m not crit­i­ciz­ing any­one who takes the dog to the groomer, I’m just say­ing I can wash my own dogs and iron my own dress shirts, and do my own gar­den­ing, car­wash­ing. And I recy­cle my gray­wa­ter.
    Bear in mind, I’m on record as say­ing I could EASILY spend 150K on clothes at Neiman Mar­cus and Saks. Selec­tive cheap­ness, it’s the Dutch way.

  18. Catherine said on November 10th, 2008 at 1:06 pm

    Know­ing where the bod­ies are buried is def­i­nitely a life skill, LAMary.

    I think the crazy doc­tor lady is pretty much in the same boat as the auto indus­try. Basi­cally, they both know that their indus­try is FUBAR. They’re look­ing at a painful restruc­tur­ing and that can make a per­son a) guz­zle cham­pagne; and b) feel inse­cure and angry. Crazy doc­tor lady is just turn­ing it toward a con­ve­nient target.

    Off to go click on those Google ads. Maybe there’s one for tar removal.

  19. alex said on November 10th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

  20. Peter said on November 10th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    I think I need to clar­ify my ear­lier post — while Soggy Paws and the Bark Bark Club will wash and clean your pooch, both places have showers/soap/towels for the DIY crowd — which is what I do.

    I mean, I can be as waste­ful as the next Repub­li­can, but I do draw the line somewhere.

  21. brian stouder said on November 10th, 2008 at 1:53 pm

    From Alex’s link:

    Pence said social issues like “the sanc­tity of mar­riage” will remain the back­bone of the Repub­li­can plat­form. “You build those con­ser­v­a­tive solu­tions, Chris, on the same time-honored prin­ci­ples of lim­ited gov­ern­ment, a belief in free mar­kets, in the sanc­tity of life, the sanc­tity of mar­riage,” Pence said.

    Hmmmm. So “lim­ited gov­ern­ment” = a game of “Mother, May I” with regard to who gets mar­ried and/or what deci­sions can be made between a doc­tor and her patient.

    Here’s some­thing that catches my ear (like a fin­ger­nail scratch­ing on a chalk­board) every­time I hear it: the Mor­mons, who put major (and tax-deducted?) dol­lars behind California’s dis­crim­i­na­tory bal­lot ini­tia­tive, are now pout­ing and whin­ing about the polit­i­cal blow-back they’re get­ting (pro­test­ers and demon­stra­tions at their facil­i­ties, and so on).

    They issued a press release say­ing that it’s NOT FAIR TO SINGLE THEM OUT for the suc­cess of the propo­si­tion they supported!

    Isn’t that absurd? They specif­i­cally backed a mea­sure that specif­i­cally SINGLES OUT indi­vid­u­als who want to get mar­ried and live their lives together, and tells them “no, YOU can­not do this”.…and they (the Mor­mons) are cry­ing that THEY are being sin­gled out?

    Some­what breathtaking

  22. Jolene said on November 10th, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    Mike Pence, who, as Alex points out, plans to rebuild the Repub­li­can party on the basis of oppo­si­tion to gay mar­riage has a con­sid­er­able record of “stu­pid as a stick” state­ments, the most promi­nent of which was his com­par­i­son of a visit to a Bagh­dad mar­ket con­ducted under armed guard to a visit ti a farmer’s mar­ket in Indiana.

    Accord­ing to Matt Ygle­sias, he is also a genius in the realm of eco­nomic affairs.

  23. brian stouder said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Well Jolene — that’s just mean-spirited dufus-ification of Pence, don­cha know?

    Hell, his back­ground includes.…talk radio!! He’s obvi­ously smarter than any­one else in the room!

  24. beb said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Does any­one else out here find Seth MacFarlane’s “Fam­ily Guy” not merely unfunny but kind of sick? I used to watch the show all the time but lately I find I can’t stom­ach any of it. Not the new shows which seem berift of plot or point, nor the later shows where some­times a plot did hold the show together. I used to find the parent’s treat­ment of their older child, Meg, kind of funny because par­ents obvi­ouly don’t always love their chil­dren equally. But lately the hatred towards Meg has become so patent and chronic that it’s like a sick­ness. Then again I don’t recall one pos­i­tive female char­ac­ter on the show, so maybe the prob­lem is that Mac­Far­lane is a hard-core misog­y­nist. But my dis­like of the show goes beyond its treat­ment of Meg. It makes jokes about child moles­ters and Stewie’s increas­ingly pre­verted sex­u­al­ity. Is it that the show has become too per­verse for me or that Mac­Far­lane has no new jokes and has become boring.

  25. Dorothy said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:09 pm

    I thought the do-it-yourself dog wash I went to when I lived in Cincin­nati was bril­liant. Wish I had thought of the idea myself. They were always busy. And it seemed much safer to take my dog there, where they had steps or a ramp for the big­ger dogs to walk on. Plus the strappy thing to hold their heads just so, to give you the free­dom to use both hands to wash them, instead of wrestling with them to keep their heads up so as not to get water in their ears. And I could leave all the drippy tow­els there.

  26. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:16 pm

    Waaaaait a minute — i thought doo­fus was spelled, well, “doo­fus.” Can we get a ruling?

    Any­how, the O’Rourke anal can­cer col­umn is here, and i’m still think­ing that in one of his mem­oirish things from his col­lege rad­i­cal days he ended up liv­ing on a farm out­side of Athens, either after or inter­spersed with his Miami of Ohio years, before he went to — Baltimore? — somewhere to work on a rad­i­cal paper and in fact was an informer for what he thought was the FBI but turned out to be the state police. I am sure of none of this, other than the embed­ded link.

  27. MarkH said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    Another one of Nancy and JC’s fel­low J-school alums, my favorite foot­ball writer, Peter King at SI. In fact, didn’t he grad­u­ate the same year as both of you? Did you know him there? I used to won­der about his polit­i­cal per­sua­sion, but today he answered it with a very nice sec­tion in his col­umn on the Obama election.

    And, beb, I agree on Fam­ily Guy; can’t get hold of it, even though my 19-year old is a devo­tee, and I try to watch it with him. And, funny thing about Peter King is he is nuts about that pro­gram and writes about it every week.

    EDIT — Jeff I agree on the spelling of doo­fus. My local ser­vice club does an annual skit show as a fundraiser where we lam­poon all the local val­ley pols. One got doo­fus as part of his name, only spelled dufus. I have argued oth­er­wise to no avail.

    And, Jeff: O’Rourke in BALTIMORE??! OHIO?? I lived in Fair­field County in the late ’70’s, and can’t imag­ine any­thing rad­i­cal there. EDIT: OK, maybe you meant Mary­land. I was track­ing a Hock­ing Hills thing there…

  28. coozledad said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    I’ve actu­ally washed one of our bea­gles in the bath­tub. The first cou­ple of times we tried a flea sham­poo, think­ing the insec­ti­cide would some­how help to cut the funk.
    It didn’t. We tried com­bi­na­tions of human and pet sham­poos, a dash of patchouli (Manet era pros­ti­tute, any­one?), even a cap­ful of house­hold bleach added to the bath­wa­ter.
    Has any­one ever tried Barkeeper’s Friend?

  29. Dorothy said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    Bea­gles fit nicely in bath­tubs. My golden retriever mix does not, unfortunately.

  30. nancy said on November 10th, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    I have sev­eral pho­tos of me and PKing (as we called him), both with ‘70s hair. Next time I’m near a scan­ner, I’ll hook you up.

    And P.J. went to Miami of Ohio. But remem­ber — Oxford is (or was) dry, so it’s no sur­prise he spent some time in Yel­low Springs. It’s close by and yet, in the most impor­tant sense, miles from the preppy Miami.

    Every­one crashed for a while on a farm near Athens, includ­ing me.

    P.J. got his master’s at Johns Hop­kins, I b’lieve.

  31. jcburns said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    PeKing not only had 70s hair, he had a white-boy-from-Connecticut afro the size of, well, Con­necti­cut. Reporters at the OU Post who didn’t want to be seen by the edi­tors could suc­cess­fully hide behind Mr. King’s hair. I say this now as some­one for whom hair is becom­ing a memory.

  32. Jolene said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:07 pm

    Just want to draw your atten­tion to a fea­ture arti­cle in yesterday’s WaPo mag­a­zine about the free clin­ics that are held in remote parts of Appalachia — this one in Wise County, VA, which appears to be some of the most god­for­saken real estate in America.

    Our images of poverty (or, at least, mine) lean toward inner cities and peo­ple of color, so this story is a use­ful cor­rec­tive. More impor­tant, though, is the por­trayal of what life is like when you have lim­ited edu­ca­tion, lit­tle income, and no health insur­ance. In short, pretty darn tough.

    In addi­tion to the story, there are a cou­ple of videos, some still pho­tos, and a follow-up web chat w/ the author.

  33. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    Jolene — you don’t have to drive past Haz­ard Co., KY to get to Wise Co., VA to find Appalachia, when up towards Colum­bus you can get to our Bal­ti­more, as MarkH points out, in Fair­field Co., OH. In Baltimore’s long-ago absorbed twin town, Basil (there’s a now-filled canal track in the long ver­sion of this story), you can walk back and forth across a quiet street to get com­pet­ing bids on meth, fresh from mama’s home-cookin’ lab.

    We lose more charm­ing yet dilap­i­dated farm houses around here to meth lab com­bustibil­ity. But in Bal­ti­more, they’re as uptown as a vil­lage of 2,800 can get. Meth, plus side­walks, and a pop machine on the cor­ner. Oth­er­wise, you have to pick the burrs out of your shoe­strings when you get back in the car after walk­ing down an unkempt rural lane to the house or shed where the deal­ing gets dealt.

  34. jcburns said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:20 pm

    It’s amaz­ing. The wash​ing​ton​post​.com folks have done some of the most sim­ple, pro­found ten minute-ish doc­u­men­taries on sub­jects from elec­tions to race rela­tions to the new eco­nom­ics to (as you saw) poverty. Their stuff should earn them a Peabody or three.

  35. nancy said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:23 pm

    Some of the best video jour­nal­ism these days is being done by print folks. The Free Press has won a cou­ple of well-deserved national Emmys. I often won­der what actual TV jour­nal­ists think when they see this hap­pen­ing. Painful thoughts, I hope.

  36. Jolene said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:30 pm

    Yeah, I worry about the Post, jc. I think they’ve been pretty cre­ative about using the web, and they have tons of read­ers from all over the world, but, like all other news­pa­pers, they are los­ing sub­scribers and adver­tis­ing rev­enue. And no one is pay­ing to use the web.

  37. MaryRC said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:38 pm

    I’m not a fan of Fam­ily Guy either but it’s my impres­sion that the cru­elty is the whole point — they’re push­ing the bound­aries of the father’s behav­ior in order to mock the stan­dard sit­com where the father is a petu­lant self-absorbed child who is always for­given. Peter can offer his wife to his friends, pub­lish an inti­mate photo of her and even get a Mafia con­tract on her life but she will just roll her eyes and say “Awwww, Petah!” and at the end of the episode there will be hug­ging. Think of sit­coms like Every­body Loves Ray­mond or any one of the many shows star­ring a boor­ish, self­ish guy mar­ried to a long-suffering wife. Fam­ily Guy is just tak­ing this to an extreme.

    On the other hand Stewie and the dog are bores. My newspaper’s comics page has no less than 4 strips fea­tur­ing talk­ing dogs, lead­ing me to observe that sim­ply putting dia­log for an adult human into a dog’s mouth doesn’t make it funny. That goes for chil­dren as well.

  38. brian stouder said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:40 pm

    Some of the best video jour­nal­ism these days is being done by print folks.

    And of course, when the broad­cast tele­vi­sion news did ‘white papers’ and doc­u­men­taries, back in the ’60’s, all their titans were print jour­nal­ists from the Sec­ond World War; that is to say, peo­ple who could write (and edit) on-the-fly.

    But we’re eat­ing our seed corn, if the papers all go the way of Lehman Brothers

  39. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 10th, 2008 at 4:48 pm

    Speak­ing of minor-key days, “the church bell chimed, and it rang twenty-nine times, for each man on the Edmund Fitzger­ald” — In Memo­riam

  40. Dexter said on November 10th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    Even though I have never been there, it’s sad about Anti­och Col­lege in Yel­low Springs clos­ing a while back. My friend wrote telling me the art-movie the­ater is still open, at least. A thumb­nail is here: http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​A​n​t​i​o​c​h​_​C​ollege

    27% of the US pop­u­la­tion is scared of Obama, thanks to right wing claims of terrorist-in-waiting and all that stuff. .

    Happy Birth­day to the United States Marine Corps. My boss at my last job was a Marine (there are, of course, no “for­mer” Marines) and he always brought in a huge fancy cake to share on this date. A salute also to all US vet­er­ans of the US Armed Forces , for tomor­row is Vet­er­ans Day.
    It’s just 38 years and a week since I invaded Viet­nam, too…tempus, it sho’ do fugit!

  41. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 10th, 2008 at 5:47 pm

    Sem­per Fi, since 1775 — cakes are being cut in some dis­tant and dusty places today.

  42. MarkH said on November 10th, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Johns Hop­kins, right. That would put O’Rourke in MD, not OH for­tu­nately for him, based on Jeff’s descrip­tion above. Sadly, this has become such a scourge. Homes in the out­ly­ing areas (read lower income) around here in the Tetons are now at risk of hav­ing required thor­ough meth lab inspec­tions prior to any financ­ing approvals; joing an increas­ing num­ber of neigh­bor­hoods through­out the coun­try, I sus­pect. Very sad about Bal­ti­more, OH. Rad­i­cal, in a way, after all. And, I had for­got­ten all about Basil! RIP

  43. coozledad said on November 10th, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    Well, so much for “there ain’t no green­house effect” fan­ta­sists.
    Here it is mid-November in NC and we’ve still got toma­toes. Not so long ago you were pick­ing the green ones in Sep­tem­ber to let them ripen on the win­dowsill; and that late avail­abil­ity wasn’t com­mon among ama­teur hor­ti­cul­tur­al­ists. It’s not just get­ting warmer, cer­tain insect pop­u­la­tions are expand­ing, turn­ing once mar­ginal pest species into real prob­lems. We now have about an acre of sod fully churned over, eaten and digested by junebug lar­vae. It looks like fuck­ing plant­ing medium. If they hatch, they’ll devour every shrub from here to New Bern.
    I remem­ber when I was a kid how cold late Sep­tem­ber used to be. Octo­ber nights you com­monly got a 15 degree freeze. Not this year. I still think we’ll get cold around Christ­mas, but win­ter only lasts two, maybe three months around here any­more.
    Today I’ve been prepar­ing Viet­namese dishes from our late fall har­vest of chiles, toma­toes and EGGPLANT. That’s just wrong.

  44. a different Connie said on November 10th, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    What do you mean you have guns in the house? You were sup­posed to turn those in last Wednesday.

  45. joodyb said on November 10th, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    for you john leonard fans, in case you didn’t see it, andrew’s tribute:

    http://​www​.salon​.com/​t​e​c​h​/​h​t​w​w​/​2​0​0​8​/​1​1​/​1​0​/​j​o​h​n​_​l​e​onard/

    ftr, there are way too many peo­ple who think africa is a coun­try and don’t know NAFTA from NAPA. big deal. our schools suck.
    i did won­der where the post-elex hatin’ was comin’ from, as the woman WAS NOT VETTED and the choice was purely polit­i­cal on McCain’s part. he wasn’t even talk­ing to her on the plane 2 weeks ago, for chris­sake. there are some ops who are seri­ously wor­ried about their careers right now.

    she is indeed ’12 mate­r­ial, based on the Rea­gan anal­ogy. i don’t think he was quite the diva she is and at least had the smarts to hire peo­ple to read the papers for him. but we’re all gonna die that year any­way, if you believe C2C.

  46. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 10th, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    Not die, but be trans­formed … big diff. We’ll all become indigo chil­dren in the cos­mic realign­ment of energy fields, pre­dicted by the infi­nitely wiser Mayans (except when they lis­tened to their shadow side and tore beat­ing hearts out of liv­ing chests of sac­ri­fi­cial vic­tims, but we all have bad days once’t in a while).

    Dec. 12, 2012. Mark your cal­en­dars, stone wheel or on-line planner.

  47. Dexter said on November 10th, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    The Africa country/continent dust-up reminded me a bit of an inci­dent from 37 years ago. I was media spokesman for our Ft. Wayne Viet­nam Vet­er­ans Against the War chap­ter.
    We had been rais­ing a lit­tle hell around Fort Wayne, demon­strat­ing a few times, and the TV and radio decided we were the big story of the day.
    For the only time in my life I was grant­ing a series of inter­views , on the phone as well as on the street.
    Rog Well­man of WANE inter­viewed me for the local evening news. The piece was taped in front of the Allen County Cour­t­house where we were con­duct­ing a demon­stra­tion against the war.
    Of course noth­ing was rehearsed and Well­man , who was quite well-versed on the war, asked a lot of good, detailed ques­tions, which I han­dled eas­ily, but some­how as I was giv­ing a long answer I said “Indone­sia” when I meant “Indochina”. I had cor­rected myself imme­di­ately, but boy…did I hear it from my brother and some friends who watched the seg­ment that night…“DUMB ASS !! DON’T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE !!…“
    Nobody is as cruel as your fam­ily and friends. No slack.

  48. Suzi said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:25 pm

    “We’re going to invite the Amer­i­can peo­ple to join us in stop­ping any slide to the left by the Obama admin­is­tra­tion or Pelosi Democ­rats,” Pence said.
    I guess Pence didn’t get the man­date memo or there’s some luke­warm KoolAid left over from the last sev­eral weeks. He wants to be Pres­i­dent reeeaal bad and the old-fashioned social con­ser­v­a­tive agenda is the only schtick he’s got. I’m warnin’ y’all — Pence/Palin … wouldn’t they make a pretty ticket?

  49. Suzi said on November 10th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

    Jeff, thanks for the reminder about the Fitz. I’ve only vis­ited the shores of Supe­rior on calm sum­mer day when the lake is serene and blue and you just can’t imag­ine a rag­ing Novem­ber gale like the one that took the Fitzger­ald. I believe the ship’s bell is still in the lit­tle ship­wreck museum at White­fish Point. You have to go through Par­adise to get there.
    Rest in peace, sailors.

  50. Suzi said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:20 pm

    Re: Panty­gate, did Sarah’s Dad really say that “the kids lose under­wear …?“
    Good God!
    So when is Sarah’s grand­baby due?
    You couldn’t make this stuff up.
    http://​emp​ty​wheel​.fire​doglake​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​1​1​/​1​0​/​u​p​d​a​t​e​-​o​n​-​t​h​e​-​u​n​d​e​r​w​e​a​r​-​audit/

  51. joodyb said on November 10th, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    And then he brought them all moose meat chili. he’s a good dad, i think. he tries.

    thanks Jeff TMMO. i feel much bet­ter think­ing of it in those terms! of course i will be try­ing to acquire the needed ‘shroomage between now and then, as well.

  52. basset said on November 11th, 2008 at 12:28 am

    the Edmund Fitzger­ald… inter­est­ing tv piece about it here:

    http://​www​.9and10news​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​s​t​o​r​y​/​?​i​d​=​144955

    comes from a local sta­tion in Michi­gan which dug up some marine radio traf­fic from the night the Fitzger­ald sank & laid pic­tures over it. needs a cou­ple of inter­views or some­thing but it’s still interesting.

  53. MarkH said on November 11th, 2008 at 12:46 am

    Uh, Jeff, I believe the date is Dec. 21, 2012. You pas­tors gotta help us be on time for our apoc­a­lypses, don’tcha know…

    http://​www​.decem​ber212012​.com/

    Can’t believe I missed the Anti­och clos­ing; had a cou­ple of friends that went there. The ones that decided to break with the crowd that went to OU.

  54. JGW said on November 11th, 2008 at 7:41 am

    My jerk ass old for­mer pub­lisher who (dis­claimer: I believe) is a com­pul­sive liar and hard core GOP wingnut decided to con­tribute to the Townsend Tire upside down flag thing with an edi­to­r­ial sup­port­ing the guy, and say­ing it’s not about race, it’s about issues. Of course he failed to men­tion that the same one issue voter who rails about abor­tion is a death penalty fan. And he also failed to note that despite all the moans and groans and Right to Life Marches every year EVERY GOP Pres­i­dent and con­gress has paid the move­ment lip ser­vice and Roe V. Wade is alive and well. I was there in the 80’s when ROn­nie waved at us in the cold, but the right is clue­less that that wave was about the strongest sup­port any GOP guy has shown the move­ment.
    For the record I am pro-life and anti-death penalty but refuse to define my vote by one issue, thats assi­nine and it’s like not both­er­ing to vote at all.
    The pub­lisher in Bluffton stated that he wrote his fan­ci­ful edi­to­r­ial to apol­o­gize for run­ning the AP brief that was not sup­port­ive of the Tire Tyrant.
    I’d post a link, but the same pub­lisher has adopted a paid access plan — like that worked well for the NY Times or any other paper– and despite a stag­ger­ing fall off in web traf­fic and , hmmmm, 35 paid read­ers, still locks out the text of sto­ries. I’m so glad that I quit that fogie fac­tory.
    I got tired of preach­ing about the new media, com­mu­nity jour­nal­ism, and build­ing good­will and cred­i­bil­ity among the younger gen­er­a­tions. Their read­ers die off in hand­fulls every day. I’d link to their obits but those are paid access too. Want to read Aunt Jean’s obit. Cough up $5.95 a month. Thanks for being clue­less and accel­er­at­ing the decline of a once great news­pa­per.
    It won’t take long before the Bluffton local paper is as retarded as the once great Hunt­ing­ton Herald-Press. They purged every­one with any clues or skills, and while the new edi­tor argues his ideas, like hype­hen­ated head­lines and huge pic­tures of noth­ing, he has man­aged to hire a staff com­posed of almost all young and pretty girls. Not women– girls.
    Am I bit­ter? Hell yes. But despite almost 20 years in jour­nal­ism I can’t con­vince my kids that news­pa­pers mat­ter any­more. If they read the local paper it’s only for the police blot­ter “man told police that lawn gnomes belong to god, thats why he stole them,” or the typos, like “He is a gifted pubic speaker.” Does he have to pick the hairs out before he speaks pubically?

  55. alex said on November 11th, 2008 at 7:46 am

    Palin is the rea­son half the GOP defected in this elec­tion. I doubt she’ll be back. Mike Pence is just Palin with a penis and a bet­ter edu­ca­tion. I’d love to see either or both on a national ticket. It’ll help keep the Dems in office.

  56. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on November 11th, 2008 at 8:03 am

    Sorry, Dec. 12 is Feast of Our Lady of Guadelupe, 21st is the win­ter sol­stice, and hence the trig­ger for the Mayan Big Crunch in 2012. Set your watches accordingly.

    Like i said to Suzi, i’m not out dri­ving around at 2 am as much as i used to (thanks be to God), so i’m a lit­tle sketchy on my C2C ref’ns.

    Today is a good day to pick up a copy of “Tolkien and the Great War,” by John Garth (uber-geek alert); it isn’t just about how WWI shaped the Lord of the Rings much more than the shad­ows of WWII loom­ing as he wrote it, but it gives you a ground level view at the front and on the home­front of just how over­whelm­ing the impact of WWI was on Eng­land, where 11 am is still a uni­ver­sally acknowl­edged moment of silence in stores and offices, pubs and parks on this eleventh day of the eleventh month, when the guns fell silent.

  57. basset said on November 11th, 2008 at 9:07 am

    Apro­pos of absolutely noth­ing… went to see Brian Wil­son last night, incred­i­ble band but I won­der what’s going on in his head. they did an hour of Beach Boys, inter­mis­sion, his whole new album and another twenty min­utes or so of old stuff… didn’t see him smile once the whole time. they had him propped behind a key­board front and cen­ter, he sang sit­ting down and lean­ing a lit­tle with his hands hang­ing by his sides.

    he’s in Ann Arbor tomor­row night, I’d go see it…

  58. MarkH said on November 11th, 2008 at 11:01 am

    Stand by, Alex. She’ll be back, and in national office.

    Lisa Murkowski’s term is up in 2010 and Palin will make a run at it. Or, how about THIS (as fel­low repub­li­can Murkowski will cer­tainly want re-election): Ted Stevens sur­vives any chal­lenge his elec­tion win, but his recent con­vic­tions wind up push­ing him out of office: she appoints her­self as his suc­ces­sor(!!). Could this actu­ally hap­pen? Based on how we’ve come to know Palin, don’t put it past her if there is a legal mech­a­nism in Alaska elec­tion law.

    In any case, my pre­dic­tion for Palin is an embarka­tion on some equiv­a­lent of a four year col­lege edu­ca­tion in pub­lic pol­icy and inter­na­tional rela­tions, as she does not let go of pres­i­den­tial aspi­ra­tions. She may sur­prise all of us. But she will end up in the sen­ate, at least. Just think of the even­tual sen­ate floor hijinx if Franken pulls this out as well. Heh.

  59. Michelle and Hillary: Salt in the wound? « Adventures at Midlife said on November 11th, 2008 at 1:18 pm

    […] all the whiny Repub­li­cans and McCain oper­a­tives who are trash­ing Sarah Palin. Please. I agree with Nancy Nall that, all the wardrobe non­sense aside, Sarah prob­a­bly knows that Africa is a con­ti­nent, not a […]