nancynall.com » Scree scree scree.

Scree scree scree.

I really don’t want to be a pill about this, but here goes: I keep run­ning into the World’s Loud­est Lawn Ser­vice. No mat­ter where I go, they are my neighbor’s choice for lawn care, lawn treat­ment and espe­cially run­ning a god­damn gas-powered edger — talk about the world’s stu­pid­est lawn chore — around the perime­ter of the lawn, prefer­ably twice, get­ting right up next to the pave­ment so sparks fly from the blade and the sound goes SCREE SCREE SCREE for 30 min­utes or so.

After which they will fire up the gas-powered blower.

The blower is always last. I am accus­tomed to work­ing in news­rooms, and I like to believe there’s no noise I can’t tune out if it’s just con­sis­tent. Tele­type machines, phones, col­leagues with dron­ing nasal voices explain­ing tax pol­icy to their edi­tors — all of these can become white noise with a lit­tle mind yoga. (In fact, I’ve often thought tele­types are even sooth­ing, that chug­ging sound they make, occa­sion­ally punc­tu­ated by bells. New lede! Writethru! Fixes Burns’ title, adds spokesman com­ment, back­ground!) But peo­ple oper­at­ing gas-powered lawn equip­ment are like the sorts of peo­ple who own motor­cy­cles — they don’t know this thing we call “idle.” The sound of a motor just going put-put-put doesn’t sat­isfy. And so they must throw in lit­tle revs every 12 sec­onds or so, goose the throt­tle a lit­tle, just to show all the other bitches out there how we roll.

Ann Arbor wasn’t lawn-crazy. You found shaggy, weedy lawns in the nicest neigh­bor­hoods in town; leggy saplings, lit­tle more than lig­ni­fy­ing (look it up) weeds, sprouted in every park strip. Tree Town always looks a lit­tle scruffy and mossy, the sign of a pop­u­lace pre­oc­cu­pied with grad­ing papers or trans­lat­ing ancient Greek or argu­ing over Hugo Chavez, and far too bohemian to worry about some­thing as stu­pid as crab­grass. Also, quiet.

Ah, well. The owner of my gym says his aches and pains remind him he’s alive. I sup­pose, when you open win­dows, you have to lis­ten to your neigh­bors from time to time. I just wish they’d let me fin­ish my god­damn cof­fee before they start.

The New York Times has a pretty good pack­age today on the Steve Jobs liver trans­plant, and the ques­tion it’s rais­ing. Look­ing for jus­tice in Amer­i­can health-care resource allo­ca­tion is a fool’s errand, but I am inter­ested in the investors’ angle, i.e., can a CEO with this high a pro­file get away with claim­ing pri­vacy when he’s obvi­ously gravely ill? This is a pub­licly traded com­pany and Jobs is hardly another cog in the Apple wheel. I’d be inter­ested in hear­ing any­one else’s thoughts about this. I’m equally amused by how quickly Jobs aban­doned the alter­na­tive ther­a­pies he was said to be try­ing after his diag­no­sis. Noth­ing like an organ trans­plant to make one a believer in the mir­a­cles of west­ern med­i­cine. Which is one way of say­ing one rea­son Amer­i­can health care is so expen­sive is because, hello, you can get a liver trans­plant. You can take statins. You can replace your damn knee when it falls apart. I’m old enough to remem­ber ads in mag­a­zines for trusses. I’m sure Jobs had great insur­ance, but still.

OK, off to the gym. Speak­ing of achy knees. Back later, but not for long, because hello? Eighty-six degrees and sunny? I’m going to the pool.

46 responses to
“Scree scree scree.”

  1. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:28 am

    God for­bid the new health care pol­icy include any rationing, because of course there’s no rationing in the cur­rent system …

  2. brian stouder said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:37 am

    Well, I was all set to offer a mild protest against the calumny heaped upon what the pro­pri­etress calls a “god­damn gas-powered edger” -

    but THEN I saw this con­text clue: “…get­ting right up next to the pave­ment so sparks fly from the blade and the sound goes SCREE SCREE SCREE for 30 min­utes or so.”

    and so I must agree with her.

    But if any­one wants to argue about gas pow­ered weed whips (with fish­ing line instead of metal blades, and which says “FFFFFFFFFFT” when it so sat­is­fy­ingly causes grass and weeds to retreat off of our dri­ve­way ad side­walk edges) — I’m ready to go to the mat (so to speak). We use ours for edges and so on, every sec­ond or third mow­ing of the lawn. (plus — I HATE grass and weeds grow­ing up in cracks)

    Any­way — we’re on the way to a funeral; prob­a­bly no cake there

  3. Colleen said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:51 am

    I have a neigh­bor who likes to light what I can only imag­ine is some kind of smudge pot. So on the approx­i­mately five lovely evenings of sum­mer, you can’t open the win­dows because of the putrid stench. Hello? We’re in city lim­its. I’m pretty sure he’s not sup­posed to do that. My fire­fighter friend actu­ally said to call 911 and report it. Um. No. Only if he lights ME on fire.

    I often won­der what it is about noise.…people just looooove to make noise. And really.…one guy with a gas trim­mer can ruin the nice morn­ing for peo­ple sev­eral blocks around. What power!

  4. moe99 said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:52 am

    Out here in the unac­cus­tomed sun­shine of Seat­tle in June, the lawn ser­vices don’t show up until Sat­ur­day. Which, of course fig­ures since that is the only day I could even con­sider sleep­ing in, if such a thing was possible.

  5. judybusy said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:54 am

    I am weirdly super annoyed by our neigh­bors two doors down when they mow the lawn. It’s tiny, no hill, and should take about _12 minutes_. But, Mrs. O_____ is out there for at least 45, obses­sively going over the lawn. Plus, she is about 75 and has TWO adult sons and a hus­band who live with her, so in a sex­ist and ageist sort of way, I seethe that they aren’t doing it. (She also shov­els the snow in win­ter.) Thanks for lis­ten­ing. I told you it was weird.

  6. Jen said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 am

    Oh, man, your lawn care sto­ries make me glad to live where I live. Due to years of neglect (our house was a shoddy rental prop­erty for years), our yard is full of weeds and very pit­ted, and it’s not even close to the worst yard on the block. We mow it weekly, which is bet­ter than many. We are work­ing on try­ing to get it to look bet­ter — we weeded one of the mas­sively over­grown flower beds Sat­ur­day, and planted some bushes a week ago — but it’s nice to know that the neigh­bors aren’t going to call the neigh­bor­hood asso­ci­a­tion on us if it’s not perfect.

  7. Sue said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:01 am

    Colleen, if you are within City lim­its you should have some kind of report­ing option. If you are in a city I’m sur­prised burn­ing is allowed at all. Your munic­i­pal code should have some reg­u­la­tions regard­ing when and how (and what) you can burn. If you are con­cerned about anonymity, you might be able to com­plain through your alder­per­son with­out bring­ing your name into it. My sug­ges­tion is that you fig­ure out code cov­er­age before com­plain­ing — it’s too easy to dis­miss a com­plainant who seems vague about what’s hap­pen­ing. Look for either a prop­erty main­te­nance, nui­sance or fire chap­ter in the code and start reading.

  8. LAMary said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:01 am

    My beloved (for so many rea­sons) next door neigh­bor has her gar­dener in at least twice a week using as many kinds of gas pow­ered equip­ment as pos­si­ble. It dri­ves my dogs crazy, so we get the combo bark­ing dogs gas engine noise and fumes pack­age. I have suc­cu­lents, cac­tus, rose­mary, laven­dar and gera­ni­ums. No grass. We use the weed whacker when nec­es­sary, and it’s elec­tric.
    Same neigh­bor has removed and installed con­crete patios three times in four­teen years. Jack­ham­mers and big mobile mix cement trucks were involved.

  9. Julie Robinson said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:19 am

    And all those gas engines are ter­ri­ble for the envi­ron­ment besides the noise pol­lu­tion. But there’s a fine line between let­ting the yard be a bit more nat­ural and hello! hillbilly.

    At half an acre we have only a push mower; most of our neigh­bors find it nec­es­sary to own a big lawn trac­tor. I find it hilar­i­ous to watch them nego­ti­at­ing sharp turns on their big behe­moths. Com­pared to where I grew up these lawns are postage stamps.

  10. Jen said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:19 am

    Colleen, what about call­ing the non-emergency num­ber for the police or fire depart­ment? I’m not sure how it works every­where, but here when you call the non-emergency num­ber you can still talk to a dis­patcher, but you’re not tying up 911 for non-essential calls? I would hope that within the city lim­its there would be a decent burn ordinance.

  11. alex said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Well, here’s a burn­ing story to beat all. The dumb broad next door who did a Mr. T on all her trees so she could have a Chem­Lawn oasis in the for­est is now burn­ing her grass clip­pings. They’re in a big metal cage where they smol­der for days and it makes the air smell like cat piss for a mile. We’re in an unin­cor­po­rated area, so there’s not much recourse. This nox­ious old bag also has a black lawn jockey on display.

  12. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:42 am

    With the white rings around the eyes?

  13. nancy said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:42 am

    Alex, you’re not really in White­Trashville until your neigh­bors burn their con­struc­tion waste and home-improvement detri­tus. One of Alan’s col­leagues died of lung can­cer a few years ago, and won­dered whether her neighbor’s asphalt-shingle fire, which smol­dered for a YEAR, might have had some­thing to do with it.

    Why pay for trash removal when you can light a match? It’s the Red­neck Way.

  14. LAMary said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:48 am

    My over­main­tain­ing and ren­o­vat­ing neigh­bor also has a panic room and an emer­gency gen­er­a­tor that auto­mat­i­cally switches on when there’s a power out­age. It turns on all the exte­rior lights includ­ing a large flash­ing yel­low light at her front gate. Last Sat­ur­day, when she wasn’t home, we were enjoy­ing her elderly deaf fox ter­rier going yap yap.…yap yap.…yap yap…for going on six hours, when someone’s stray mylar bal­loon hit the power lines and every­thing went dark. Her house lit up like Vegas so we didn’t need flash­lights. She’s got some seri­ous wattage going in with her exte­rior light­ing. That flash­ing yel­low light is just the touch to accel­er­ate the feel­ing that you are rush­ing towards tem­po­rary insanity.

  15. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:48 am

    No, that’s the White­Trash trash way — the Red­neck Way is to drive your pickup out beyond the edge of paved roads and find a good gully, then back up enough to shove it out the gate and watch it bounce down towards the streambed.

    And every so often, either the truck gets backed up too far, or the shov­eler gets too enthu­si­as­tic and flies off the end of the bed (because the gate prob­a­bly is gone years ago when you were load­ing a ‘fridge onto it, just snapped off one side so you kicked it off the other hinge and left it by the road). Then the county sher­iff who has to come help retrive you or your vehi­cle also gets to write you a ticket for “unau­tho­rized dumping.”

    (LAMary, i’m think­ing you live next to Tanned Trash, what with the panic room and the fox ter­rier. Or would it be Lexus Trash?)

  16. coozledad said on June 23rd, 2009 at 11:53 am

    I guess most zon­ing restric­tions pro­hibit sheep. They’re mostly quiet, except for a kind of chuffing/choking noise they make when it’s hot, and the occa­sional Blar­rgghh! (I think “Baa” is an angli­ciza­tion of “mehblah”, or “bebluh”, which is the only other thing I’ve actu­ally heard them say. They all mean the same thing, which is “Watch out! My tiny brain is itch­ing.”)
    If they man­age to get out of your yard, your neigh­bor will no longer have any need for noisy lawn­care equip­ment. But guns are pretty loud, too.
    These are use­ful for small acreages, although they take a lit­tle while to learn how to use:http://www.scythesupply.com/outfits.htm
    It took me a cou­ple of years to really get the hang of it, but it’s a kind of tai chi once you learn it. With a good blade, you can also do close work about as effec­tively as with a string trimmer.

  17. LAMary said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    Lexus it is! A Lexus SUV.

  18. Joe Kobiela said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    N,
    Pic­tures!! Pool pic­tures Please.
    Pilot Joe

  19. coozledad said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    The pre­vi­ous occu­pants of our house just pushed their junk into the woods. We’re still clean­ing up an old creek bed that was full of house­hold rub­bish, white goods and por­tions of old cars. There’s even an old Stude­baker strad­dling our north­ern prop­erty line.
    I’m afraid we do torch our ani­mals when they expire. Espe­cially the larger ones.
    I don’t mind dig­ging a hole, but I’m not too keen on chop­ping off legs to get an ani­mal in a shal­low grave. Plus, since I’m a veg­e­tar­ian, I fig­ure I get bar­be­cue credits.

  20. ROgirl said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:23 pm

  21. Catherine said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    I hear goats are good for land­scape main­te­nance too, but smarter than sheep. (on edit: Hah! cross posted w/ ROgirl!)

    We have a neigh­bor with the world’s nois­i­est attic fan. To me it’s more white noise, but it dri­ves DH nearly around the bend. The thing that mys­ti­fies me is that she runs this thing in defi­ance of the laws of physics. I mean, after the really hot air is out of the attic, the fan can­not make things cooler, so why keep run­ning it? We retal­i­ate with a barky dog and two screamy girls who like to swim with their equally screamy friends. Now that I see this in writ­ing, maybe that’s why she runs the fan…

  22. LAMary said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:40 pm

    For a while I mounted a bas­ket­ball hoop on the side of the yard near the nox­ious neigh­bor, but all she got was bounce bounce thunk type noises. My kids are pretty quiet.

  23. Catherine said on June 23rd, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    Get­ting all seri­ous for a moment, I think it’s clear that Apple should be telling share­hold­ers more about Jobs’ health. It’s mate­r­ial, blah blah. How­ever, when I think of the num­ber of new and cre­ative ways in which share­hold­ers have been totally screwed by the boards and exec­u­tive com­mit­tees of pub­li­cally held com­pa­nies in the recent past, it kind of pales in com­par­i­son. Which makes me think that it’s Jobs’ rock-star sta­tus, and the fact that it’s a health issue, that makes it news. If only there was as much inter­est in, say, Moody’s debt-rating method­ol­ogy and the cozi­ness of their relationships.

  24. Sue said on June 23rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    I like the sound of kids, I don’t know why. I hope that doesn’t go away as I get older (or older-er, I guess). Noisy kids, even noisy teenagers late in the evening, sound like happy life to me. I like it as a back­ground noise. Noisy kids with cars, not so much, but that hasn’t been a huge prob­lem over the years with var­i­ous crops of neigh­bor­hood children.

  25. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 23rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    Had a par­son­age with an attic fan, and i’d say it worked bet­ter than chas­ing the elu­sive “cross breeze” even on a steamy hot day. I’d trade an attic fan for cen­tral air, but lack­ing A/C, run­ning an attic fan all night start­ing pretty early in the evening works awfully well.

    By the way, if you haven’t been over to Roger Ebert’s blog lately, he has yet another mar­velous rem­i­nis­cence of an aver­age every­day early 60s child­hood, which over­laps enough with mine to feel absolutely in tune with my mem­o­ries, a few coun­ties over.

    The prob­lem with Jobs and Apple is the close­ness of the brand­ing between the two; you haven’t seen the like since Uncle Walt. Even Hewlett or Packard had less direct pub­lic iden­ti­fi­ca­tion with their com­pany, let alone Bar­tles and Jaymes. What hap­pens to Jobs hap­pens to Apple, which isn’t the same as say­ing the com­pany can’t sur­vive his loss (may he live decades longer in peace and joy), but the impact would be huge.

  26. Julie Robinson said on June 23rd, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    I’m so relieved to know that I grew up as only white trash, not red­neck…
    There was no trash pickup avail­able so we had a burn­ing bar­rel, and it let me get any incip­i­ent fire­bug lean­ings all used up.

    All those dumps are pro­vid­ing our col­lege son with gain­ful employ­ment in mos­quito con­trol again this sum­mer. They are going to a site this after­noon with acres and acres of woods filled with tires. The entire depart­ment will spend the rest of the day there.

  27. Jolene said on June 23rd, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Another tree falls: Gene Wein­garten has taken the WaPo’s buy­out offer. Says he will keep doing his weekly columns, but no more longer fea­ture arti­cles, as he will be work­ing, instead, on book and movie projects. No more weekly web chats, although he’ll do a monthly chat instead.

    Does it make me a bad per­son that I feel sad­der about this news than the news that nine peo­ple died in yesterday’s Metro accident?

  28. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Wow — what edi­tor let *that* happen?

  29. Jolene said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    The Post has offered buy­outs to many of its over-50 stars over the past few years, and many of them have taken the offer. Can’t think of all of them right now, but Tom Shales, Tom Ricks, Stephen Hunter, Marc Fisher, and Michael Dirda come to mind. Many of these peo­ple con­tinue to write for the Post, as Wein­garten will, but at a reduced level and with­out the Post being obliged to pay for their health insurance.

    Here is Howard Kurtz com­ment­ing on the buy­out pro­gram last spring. As he says, the loss in these cases is to the paper and its read­ers rather than, in most cases, to the bought-out individuals.

  30. nancy said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    I recall read­ing that Bob Wood­ward col­lects only a token salary from them, but retains his title and an office and a few other cer­e­mo­nial trap­pings. Keep the over­head a lit­tle lower and gives him the free­dom to do what he wants. Win-win.

  31. Jolene said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    That’s right. As far as I can tell, Wood­ward shows up at The Post when he has a new book to sell or when there’s some other spe­cial issue where he has exper­tise to convey.

  32. Dorothy said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Oh Sue I’m the same way! I never mind hear­ing kids laugh and play out­side. I don’t get to hear it enough now that we’re on 3 acres. But catty cor­ner from our house is a nice home and they have four lit­tle ones under the age of 7. I’ve only met two of them. But when I walk Augie and Husky after I get home from work, they never fail to come skip­ping down to talk to me. I’d rather be around most lit­tle ones than many adults — they are such enter­tain­ing con­ver­sa­tion­al­ists. I babysat for my co-workers lit­tle girls two weeks ago (ages 5 and 2) and taught the older one to sing “Hot Dig­gity, Dog Dig­gity, BOOM what you DO to me!” She thought that was the fun­ni­est song she’d ever heard.

  33. Jolene said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Here’s a descrip­tion of the specifics of the WaPo buy­out pro­gram. I sus­pect that many 57-year-olds (Gene’s age) would view them­selves as quite for­tu­nate to be sep­a­rated from their employer under such circumstances.

  34. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    And i rue­fully note that once again health insur­ance con­torts ratio­nal busi­ness deci­sions, whether in the auto indus­try or the news biz.

    Or why so many of the key play­ers in juve­nile jus­tice are 12 and 30 hour a week skilled pro­fes­sion­als, and the full time jobs are held by mostly 20-somethings and a cadre of grey­headed supervisors/administrators. Craziness.

  35. Jolene said on June 23rd, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Well, I should say that I wasn’t speak­ing on the basis of real knowl­edge when I referred to health insur­ance. But, clearly, the idea is to cut labor costs, and one does that by reduc­ing the ranks of the most expen­sive employ­ees and offer­ing more lim­ited ben­e­fits to newer ones.

  36. deb said on June 23rd, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    julie, we had a burn bar­rel, too. i was just telling some­body this morn­ing about one of my favorite child­hood amuse­ments — burn­ing trash with an aerosol can and wait­ing for the explo­sion. almost as much fun as smok­ing in the barn!

    some­times i think it’s a mir­a­cle i sur­vived my rural childhood.

  37. MichaelG said on June 23rd, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    I had a neigh­bor out there one day for over an hour try­ing to blow wet leaves.

    We had goats in Auburn. My for­mer still has them. She always felt they should be fed nice stuff. This was all well and good, but they refused to eat any crap like grass and weeds. I called them the wel­fare goats.

    Burn­ing stuff in CA is just not on. You can do some burn­ing in rural areas, but the drill is to call the county hot line first to learn if the day is a burn day. Be quick. There aren’t many. Usu­ally cool driz­zly days. Also what you burn and how you burn are reg­u­lated. They do watch and they do enforce. This is one area where rural neigh­bors will inform on you. The stakes are just too high.

  38. Rana said on June 23rd, 2009 at 8:19 pm

    MichaelG — I grew up in Cal­i­for­nia, with fam­ily friends who lived in the coun­try, so I know what you’re talk­ing about. When I first moved to the Mid­west it freaked me out a bit to see peo­ple burn­ing stuff in their yards, near trees, with­out sev­eral some­ones stand­ing guard with the hoses. I still think “brush­fire” (or, as they now call them, “wild­fire”) when I smell burn­ing leaves, not “trash pile.”

  39. coozledad said on June 23rd, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    They’re a lit­tle more dis­ci­plined about burn­ing leaves and assorted garbage here in NC now, but you still often drive by unat­tended leaf mold fires blaz­ing in a ditch and cast­ing a blan­ket of smoke across the road. Admit­tedly I’m an enviro-pain-in-the ass in a lot of ways, but it strikes me that com­post­ing the things would be far more pro­duc­tive, less labor inten­sive, and far less likely to cause the stray head-on collision.

  40. Dexter said on June 24th, 2009 at 1:13 am

    I mowed Tues­day. I have been mow­ing every five days, as all this rain makes the lawn grow double-fast. Tomor­row I have to weed. I had a plas­tic fish-line weed cut­ter but it died, so I just pull them out.
    I had the best show­ing of roses this year, ever. Prob­a­bly three times as many roses bloomed as ever before, as I have been prun­ing that bush for years.
    Now I have the best mul­berry crop ever, my tree is yield­ing thou­sands of berries.
    Now as for mow­ing, I try to mow with my reel-mower (motor­less) four days after I have used the power mower. It makes the yard look really nice to cut it that way, as I don’t har­vest lawn clip­pings, I let them dry a few days and then shred them with the reel mower.
    I had a bike ride planned but after two dog walk­ings at two parks and the lawn care in the heat, I couldn’t get out of the chair , espe­cially with the best game of the year on, a see-saw affair beween the Cubs and the Detroit Tigers, won by a Tiger home run in the bot­tom of the ninth.

    Two years ago my neigh­bor tore down his garage and burned it every night, a smol­der­ing heap . It took at least ten weeks, a lit­tle fire each night.
    You are NOT sup­posed to burn that stuff. Oh well…at least the next-door neigh­bor quit his nasty fire-habit ( I think the land­lord must have forced him to quit). Oh, and they half-assedly mowed part of the yard last week…FOR THE FIRST TIME ALL SUMMER.

    The cov­er­age of the I-69 head-on crash that killed the golfer’s wife over the week­end was quite good (kpc news, but ya gotta have a paid sub) .
    The sol­diers that were pass­ing through, the parish­ioners of St Anthony’s, the ath­letes on the bus who were not injured too bad, all pulled out all the stops to han­dle the sit­u­a­tion, even as to prepar­ing a LZ for the heli­copter ambu­lances.
    Why are so many peo­ple cross­ing lanes and smash­ing into other vehi­cles? it hap­pened in But­ler Mon­day night, too. And near Auburn Mon­day eve, I saw a semi-truck veer off onto the shoul­der and scrape some of those reflec­tive poles, and then do it AGAIN five miles down the road!

  41. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 24th, 2009 at 9:15 am

    Warn­ing, thread­jack attempt: http://​www​.medi​a​bistro​.com/​t​v​n​e​w​s​e​r​/​e​v​e​n​i​n​g​_​n​e​w​s​_​r​a​t​i​n​g​s​/​e​v​e​n​i​n​g​_​n​e​w​s​_​r​a​t​i​n​g​s​_​w​e​e​k​_​o​f​_​j​u​n​e​_​1​5​_​1​1​9​6​95.asp

    So if we’re head­ing south of 5% of Amer­ica at this rate watch­ing the evening news, and even if you assume every Blitzer/O’Reilly/Matthews/Olbermann/Maddow/Hannity/Cooper viewer is non-duplicated among them­selves or with the Big 3 news­casts, you can’t hardly even get to 10% — where are peo­ple get­ting their news from?

    This doesn’t quite sound the way i intend it, but are we already into a zone where most news float­ing around in the thought bub­ble of the body politic is that which is picked up sec­ond hand, in con­ver­sa­tion or FB com­ments from some­one who watched “The Daily Show,” with occa­sional confirmation/clarification of con­fus­ing details (what’s a Uighur, and why does Jon think this is funny?) from a zip through Google News?

    On the other hand, i’m just not con­vinced that an aver­age con­ver­sa­tion on pol­i­tics and for­eign pol­icy is that much more dra­mat­i­cally ill-informed than they were twenty years ago. My the­ory on news­pa­pers has been that we don’t actu­ally have fewer read­ers, but just don’t have as many peo­ple sub­scrib­ing & buy­ing papers they never read; ditto books and fic­tion read­ing. So could it be that even in the pri­vacy of the home, we only just recently felt (as a soci­ety) that it was OK to not turn on Wal­ter or Dan or that nice lady who was on the Today Show after din­ner? Honey, just click to that Ani­mal Chan­nel pro­gram, it’s more relax­ing than all those protests somewhere.…

    Even if i’m right about that (peo­ple weren’t really watch­ing before, stopped going through the motions in the last few years), it still leaves open the ques­tion — where is the crit­i­cal mass com­ing from on what peo­ple know/think they know about the nation and the world? I don’t think we know. And sec­ond­hand water­cooler “i heard it on Jon Stew­art” is as good an answer as any right now.

  42. nancy said on June 24th, 2009 at 9:21 am

    Inter­est­ing topic, Jeff, although I doubt it will take off today. The other I saw one of my Twit­ter fol­low men­tion Steve Jobs’ liver trans­plant, and another chide him for report­ing “old” news, because social media had it two hours pre­vi­ous. As though all you need to know is con­tained in 140 characters.

    On the other hand, tra­di­tional media have been tout­ing bull­shit “firsts” and “exclu­sives” for years, so at least I know where they learned it.

  43. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 24th, 2009 at 9:46 am

    Heh. Well, y’know, if it doesn’t take off — it wasn’t news, was it?

    (I think i’m just going to pull out my VHS of Broad­cast News and watch that open­ing sequence at the TV pro­duc­ers and reporters con­fer­ence. Holly Hunter’s pro­ducer had it pegged all too well. “You’re going to get a lot more of it.” Faint echo­ing “Good” from the depart­ing crowd.)

  44. LA Mary said on June 24th, 2009 at 9:54 am

    I saw on Col­bert the other night that Rush Lim­baugh claims the FDA is tak­ing Zicam off the mar­ket because Zicam is one of his spon­sors, not because it can relieve a per­son of their sense of smell per­ma­nently. Rush called it the Demo­c­rat push to put Zicam out of business.

  45. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on June 24th, 2009 at 9:58 am

    Is that why they made Oxy­Con­tin a con­trolled sub­stance, too?

    (Rush, Rush, don’t talk about drugs and unin­tended impacts on the senses. It’s just too easy.)

  46. Rana said on June 24th, 2009 at 11:18 am

    Jeff (tmmo) — in my case it’s a mix­ture of trusted blogs and — gasp — news­pa­pers and mag­a­zines (the Sun­day NY Times, the New Yorker, and the Econ­o­mist, mostly) and emails from orga­ni­za­tions to which I belong (like the Sierra Club) and char­i­ties I sup­port (like Heifer and Mercy Corps). No tele­vi­sion news, ever — it is eter­nally shitty and appalls me every time I encounter it anew.

    Part of the rea­son I’ve shifted away from the clas­sic tv-and-newspaper approach is that few of those actu­ally give me the kind of news I want. Not the slant, the sub­jects and the approach. One thing that I’ve found, over the years, is that the typ­i­cal main­stream news out­let in this coun­try is afraid to tackle issues of com­plex­ity that unfold over a long span, such as eco­nomic devel­op­ments, the polit­i­cal changes occur­ring in other coun­tries, envi­ron­men­tal issues, gen­der pol­i­tics, and so on. Much of it is like read­ing a child’s ver­sion of the world, with all the parts that inter­est me left out, or so dumbed-down that it’s insulting.

    I con­sider myself an informed per­son, who pays atten­tion to what’s going on around her, but what I get from most “news” out­lets isn’t infor­ma­tion, but noise. (Who cares what Jon and Kate ate? Or that the Oba­mas went on a date?)