nancynall.com » Costume party.

Costume party.

I can’t get over the known facts of this (like a good journo, I say: alleged) wire­tap­ping attempt in Louisiana. Every part of it is a forehead-smacker, up to and includ­ing the price­less detail that this escapade is, hello, a felony, mean­ing right-wing hero James O’Keefe is now in very very big trou­ble. Which doesn’t make it any less funny.

If the facts of the case turn out to be any­thing like the alle­ga­tions of the case, it’s pretty clear what hap­pened here: A stu­pid, heed­less young man, drunk on atten­tion and look­ing for a fol­lowup to a coup that landed him on all the big Fox talk shows, made the mis­take of assum­ing that because he’s smarter than a crim­i­nally dumb Acorn office worker, he’s smarter than every­one. You have to admire his logic: I was on “Fox & Friends,” ergo, I am smart. In a bet­ter world, his ridicu­lous pimp out­fit alone would have got­ten him laughed out of any­thing other than a Hal­loween party; instead, he got a hidden-camera scoop. And so he learned the les­son every reporter learns after his or her first big story: Sooner or later your edi­tor is going to wan­der past your desk, stop and say, “So, what do you have com­ing for tomorrow?”

O’Keefe appears to have been lin­ing up his sec­ond act when he and his bud­dies were arrested, “wear­ing jeans, flu­o­res­cent green vests, tool belts and hard hats.” Because that would fool any­one, right? Every­body needs a hard hat to work in an office phone closet.

I used to work with a bull­dog of a reporter who once tried to sneak into a hos­pi­tal ER — a homi­cide scene — wear­ing a white lab coat and car­ry­ing a clip­board. He was thrown out almost imme­di­ately, but it scored big A-for-effort points with the bosses and peo­ple called him “doc­tor” for a while after­ward. It’s funny how dis­guises work: Badly, most of the time. You can go to the uniform-supply store and stock up, but you almost always get impor­tant details wrong. You for­get the way nurses put stick­ers on their name tags. You wear the wrong shoes. (Maybe you’ve been watch­ing “House” and assume all female physi­cians wear stilet­tos and plung­ing neck­lines, like Dr. Cuddy.) You for­get to erase the expres­sion from your face and give off a ner­vous vibe. There’s a rea­son good actors make good money. A believ­able imper­son­ation is no small achievement.

That this ridicu­lous caper was attempted in the com­pany of the son of a U.S. attor­ney only makes it fun­nier. Things may look grim for Democ­rats in 2010, but as long as there are young men like James O’Keefe in the world, we’ll always have entertainment.

A tan­gent, but it just popped into my head: I remem­ber, in the film “Crumb,” a scene where Robert Crumb goes out mak­ing sketches of the lit­tle infra­struc­ture details in Amer­i­can cities. He was about to move to France, and wanted to get them down so he wouldn’t for­get to put them in the back­grounds of his draw­ings — high-tension wires, street lights, fire hydrants, con­crete blocks at the end of park­ing places, all visual clut­ter we see-but-don’t, and only notice when they’re miss­ing. That’s what peo­ple for­get when they’re try­ing to be some­one else.

A few years ago, I looked up from my desk in the news­room to see Sen. Evan Bayh walk­ing past, en route to a meet­ing with the edi­to­r­ial board. He is exactly what he appears to be in his pho­tos — tall, slim, blonde*, blandly hand­some in that vote-for-me kind of way. His suit fit him well with­out being overly Euro­pean. If Hoosiers can be Brah­mins, that’s what he looked like. Behind him scur­ried a num­ber of aides, the lead one car­ry­ing all the hard­ware; his pants sagged from the weight of the mul­ti­ple cell-phone hol­sters, pagers and PDAs he car­ried, this being before the era of con­sol­i­da­tion in a sin­gle device. The way his navy-blue blazer stuck out at strange angles at his waist — that was the detail a cos­tume designer try­ing to dupli­cate the look for a movie would strug­gle with. But it was the detail that estab­lished his sta­tion in life, the way Bayh’s slim weight­less­ness dis­tin­guished his own.

And with that, a dis­cus­sion of mis­be­hav­ior and one of the aide’s bur­den, we can segue neatly to the wisps of John Edwards’ dig­nity, blow­ing in the wind now that his own fac­to­tum is turn­ing on him:

Accord­ing to Young, (Reille) Hunter called him in May 2007 to say she was preg­nant. Young says that when he informed Edwards, the sen­a­tor told him to “han­dle it,” to which he replied: “I can’t han­dle this one.” Young writes that Edward unloaded on Hunter as a “crazy slut,” said they had an “open rela­tion­ship,” and put his pater­nity chances at “one in three.” Young says that Edwards asked him for help per­suad­ing Hunter to have an abor­tion. Young writes that Hunter believed the baby to be “some kind of golden child, the rein­car­nated spirit of a Bud­dhist monk who was going to help save the world.”

Crazy Agnes of God believed she was car­ry­ing the Almighty’s baby. Crazy new-age girls believe they’re Buddha’s baby mama. It’s all crazy, and it’s all cringe­wor­thy, through and through.

Guer­rilla bridge-makers step up to do what city won’t. I’m intrigued to learn this pipe has been leak­ing across a New York City side­walk for “years” — I thought that only hap­pened in Detroit. Down near Alan’s office a cou­ple years back, a bro­ken water main leaked into the street for months on end before it was repaired, and the city’s jury-rig for the win­ter was to come down from time to time and dump a load of salt on it, simul­ta­ne­ously appalling and funny. When we went to Buenos Aires, I noticed how bro­ken side­walks and other pedes­trian haz­ards were far less likely to be cor­doned off with tape or marked by cones. Walk at your own risk! It’s a dan­ger­ous world out there.

And I must turn to work. Enjoy Hump Day, how­ever you spend it.

* Hoosier read­ers object to the des­ig­na­tion of Bayh as a blonde, and after exam­in­ing the photo record, I think they’re right. I always pic­ture him as sort of an ashy dark blonde in my head, but now his hair is dark brown. He’s almost cer­tainly cov­er­ing the gray; maybe going darker is more believ­able than keep­ing him light. What­ever, only his hair­dresser knows for sure. Corrected.

53 responses to
“Costume party.”

  1. brian stouder said on January 27th, 2010 at 10:35 am

    Enjoy Hump Day, how­ever you spend it.

    Hah!! Just so you know, I’m steal­ing that one

    (it’s akin to the old George Car­lin sports­caster line “for those of you scor­ing at home, and also if you’re alone”)

  2. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 10:51 am

    Your assess­ment of James O’Keefe is, I think, right on the money. The lure of the spot­light to a young man on the make look­ing to bur­nish his right-wing cre­den­tials must’ve been nearly impos­si­ble to ignore. And now, this laugh­ably inept caper that is going to gen­er­ate any­thing but chuck­les in the homes of these four young douchemon­gers. Well, given the mur­derer of Dr. George Tiller is rak­ing in dona­tions from pro-lifers, per­haps the deeper-pocketed among greater wingnut­tia will help these creeps defray their expenses. Or maybe not. A lit­tle time in stir –most likely at a min­i­mum secu­rity facil­ity but it is still prison– might ben­e­fit these chil­dren of privilege.

  3. coozledad said on January 27th, 2010 at 10:53 am

    My fear is that some­how, with the fundies clot­ting up the DOJ, they’ll find a way to delib­er­ately mis­han­dle the case so you get another pre­fab po white boy sob story.
    I hope not, but we live in a coun­try where Gor­don Liddy can not only walk around with­out fear of being stoned to death, he’s paid for his opin­ion.
    EDIT: “Loaded dia­pers” Vit­ter is already threat­en­ing to block the replace­ment for the Bushie DA and father of one the retarded tele­phone ser­vice guys.

  4. Sue said on January 27th, 2010 at 11:16 am

    “They then told the staffer they needed to per­form repair work on the main phone sys­tem and asked where the tele­phone closet was located. The staffer showed the men to the main Gen­eral Ser­vices Admin­is­tra­tion office on the 10th floor, and Flana­gan and Basel went in. There, a GSA employee asked for the men’s cre­den­tials. They said they left them in their vehi­cle.
    The U.S. Marshal’s Ser­vice appre­hended all four men shortly thereafter.”

    This does not make Landrieu’s office staff look par­tic­u­larly bright, either. No one asked for IDs until they had been in at least two sep­a­rate offices in the build­ing? That should be stan­dard train­ing, right, espe­cially in a Fed­eral Build­ing? Maybe one staffer was call­ing the cops while the other got them out of the office.

    The arti­cle seems to indi­cate that Mr. O’Keefe still hasn’t real­ized the mag­ni­tude of the trou­ble he’s in. “The truth shall set me free”? Whose truth, sweetheart?

  5. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 11:18 am

    C’mon, Cooz! We all know “Dia­per Dave” Vit­ter is a staunch defender of tra­di­tional fam­ily val­ues and an avowed enemy of Naz­i­ho­molib­er­al­so­cial­ist­fas­cist­e­d­u­cat­edelit­ist­fem­i­nists. Can’t a brother take his pants down with a pros­ti­tute once in awhile if he is doing all that good work?

    You ever won­der how many of our 100 sen­a­tors are really just stu­pid peo­ple? I think I could stop 10 folks on the streets of Chicago and they’d be smarter, on aver­age, than Vit­ter, John Ensign or James Imhofe, who truly seems almost too dumb to breathe and walk at the same time. Think about it. There are only 100 of these jobs and a sig­nif­i­cant pro­por­tion of them are per­formed by peo­ple who are so dumb they need to remind them­selves not to look up at the rain lest they drown.

  6. Sue said on January 27th, 2010 at 11:25 am

  7. moe99 said on January 27th, 2010 at 11:45 am

    Nance, your descrip­tion of Bayh could have been of the ex as well. The guy, who for most of our mar­riage couldn’t exer­cise because of his two bad knees, now is a fit­ness and tan­ning booth hound. And Ital­ian loafers and very nice suits. I should use all the pho­tos of him from when we were first mar­ried and he was still wear­ing dou­ble knits and had his gold front tooth, as black­mail if he runs for gov­er­nor in 2012 as is rumored!

  8. brian stouder said on January 27th, 2010 at 11:51 am

    moe — I’d hang on to all that stuff, and at pre­cisely the right moment, sell it to TMZ (or whoever).

    If he looks like he’s going to win, that ‘right moment’ might be a month after his election

  9. paddyo' said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    The SETI project thing reads like The Onion, doesn’t it, Sue? Ahh, science …

    I know these undercover-disguise capers work only on TV and in movies, but a lot of places still have poorly paid, dis­tracted rent-a-cops mind­ing the front desk, even post-9/11. I guess it’s too tempt­ing, even for a for­mer fake pimp …

    Though I never par­tic­i­pated in such a scheme for a news story, I did have a part in a suc­cess­ful, no-harm-no-foul caper 20 years ago last month in the then-highly charged “news­pa­per war” between The Den­ver Post and Rocky Moun­tain News.

    The Rocky, No. 1 in cir­cu­la­tion at the time, had out­bid the syn­di­cated “Garfield” comic strip out from under The Post ear­lier that year. It cel­e­brated at Xmas­time by plant­ing giant, two-dimensional fig­ures of the fat cat (in a Santa hat) and his canine pal Odie atop the newspaper’s wedding-cake-tiered rooftop down­town. Look­ing out our news­room win­dow from The Post about four blocks away became too much for one of my col­leagues, who hatched our plan to put an equally giant copy of The Post in Odie’s mouth.

    On the appointed morn­ing, Jim and I walked through the front lobby of The Rocky, both in over­alls and he in a Rocky ball­cap. We car­ried a red tool­box (with a cam­corder inside) and an alu­minum exten­sion lad­der (Garfield and Odie were one level up from the unlocked, 3rd-floor patio where we were headed). The guards waved us through and we took the elevator.

    Five min­utes behind us, fel­low reporter Jen­nifer car­ried a giant pack­age, 4 feet by 8 feet, wrapped in butcher paper and a big red bow. The guards even held the door for her. She told them it was “for the Christ­mas party.”

    We all met on the patio, raised the lad­der, and Jen­nifer and Jim hung the “news­pa­per” (painted on a sheet of foam­core with The Post’s mast and a “MERRY XMAS” head­line by my then-wife, an artist) in the car­toon dog’s mouth while I videotaped.

    Another reporter, Michelle, waited curb­side down­stairs in our get­away vehi­cle. Across the street, one of our staff pho­tog­ra­phers took pix, and one or two of the local TV sta­tions got footage. Our gift stayed up there for more than an hour of the morn­ing rush until men in suits and ties hur­riedly scur­ryied out on the roof to tear it down.

    We like to think it helped us turn around the cir­cu­la­tion war (for the time being, any­way). It sure was a morale booster in our shop … prob­a­bly not the out­come for lit­tle pimp­boy Mr. O’Keefe.

  10. Sue said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    pad­dyo’ that is a great story. Do any pic­tures sur­vive anywhere?

  11. deb said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:12 pm

    my favorite fac­toid from the lat­est john edwards rev­e­la­tion was his (alleged) direc­tions to his aide to steal one of the baby’s dia­pers so he could do his own pater­nity test with the DNA. poor eliz­a­beth. she really is mar­ried to a monster.

  12. nancy said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    The key detail in Paddy’s story is “over 20 years ago.” That’s when you could walk around in cov­er­alls with an exten­sion lad­der and get away with stuff. You ought to see the hoops you have to jump through to get into an office build­ing in down­town Detroit these days. Some of it’s crime, but most it’s the old “in the wake of 9/11…” Some­times I think the ter­ror­ists really did win that day.

    There’s a funny story about Mike Peters, the car­toon­ist, com­ing in to a meet­ing of the Day­ton Daily News edi­tors via the win­dow, wear­ing a Super­man suit, from at least that long ago, and maybe a few more decades.

  13. deb said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    re reporters in dis­guise, an edi­tor i once worked for directed a baby-faced twen­tysome­thing to hang out in an area of the city with a lot of gay bars and “see what hap­pens.” that was about the extent of his instructions.

    the kid spent an uncom­fort­able night loung­ing on street cor­ners, fend­ing off advances and inquiries like “hey, how much?” (his response: “more than you can afford,” which might have been enough to col­lar him if the ques­tioner had been a cop.) it’s a mir­a­cle he came back to the news­room with his virtue intact.

  14. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    Great story, Paddyo.

    I was never all that clever, but when I cov­ered the police beat, I took pains to look like a plain­clothes detec­tive. I would pull up at a crime scene in a car fes­tooned with anten­nas and emerge in a cheap sport coat, slacks and tie. My hair was neatly trimmed and sans beard back then. I even bought a metal clip­board that looked like the ones the police car­ried. Any civil­ian who saw me would gen­er­ally assume I was with the P.D. and talk to me when I asked questions.

    I was very young and cal­low –really right out of col­lege– and did not rec­og­nize (or maybe I hid it from myself)that I was being uneth­i­cal by not iden­ti­fy­ing myself as a reporter straight up. I fig­ured if bystanders thought I was a cop, great. If they asked, I was hon­est. Nancy knows the old bird I was work­ing for at the time, a guy who wanted results and who advised me time and again to never ask for per­mis­sion to do any­thing at a crime scene. His dic­tate was that if the cops told me to stop, I was to take two more steps.

    The whole gam­bit col­lapsed when the news­pa­per decided to quit buy­ing its own press cars, which tra­di­tion­ally were white four-door sedans equipped with radios, scan­ners, etc. in favor of leased Buick Cen­tury two-doors. Nobody in Colum­bus would buy the idea that cop­pers were dri­ving around in flashy Buicks.

    Nance’s edit: He would also call from the press room at police HQ and say, “This is Bor­den down at police head­quar­ters. What’s going on?” Not a lie, but not the whole truth. Peo­ple fell for it all the time.

  15. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    Ouch. I for­got about that one. It was an incred­i­ble time saver, given how fre­quently 7 – 11’s were robbed. Still, not one of my proud­est moments.

    Nance: Oh, don’t go hav­ing sec­ond thoughts now, you pussy. Bor­den also taught me this old trick: “Can we have a photo of the deceased, ma’am? …Oh, that’s a nice one. …So is that one. …Say, do you mind if I take all these pic­tures with me back to the news­pa­per, so our photo edi­tor can choose the best one? We want your son to look his best.” And then, when the C-J or a TV sta­tion rolled by to do their inter­view, all the pic­tures were in the hands of the com­pe­ti­tion. Just remem­ber­ing it makes me want to put on my fedora and yell COPY!

  16. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    Noth­ing got uncom­mu­nica­tive peo­ple to talk to you faster than nod­ding under­stand­ingly and say­ing “Sure, I see you aren’t ready to talk to any­one; is there any­one else you think I could talk to about him/her/them?”

  17. Michael said on January 27th, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    In 1972 I was an under­grad­u­ate and sum­moned to be Sen­a­tor Birch Bayh’s dri­ver for the day when he was in town to speak at the annual Jef­fer­son Jack­son Day din­ner. He was explor­ing a pres­i­den­tial bid and mak­ing the rounds. I was sur­prised sev­eral months later to get a call from his office ask­ing me to accom­pany the Sen­a­tor as aide de-camp when he appeared at a polit­i­cal meet­ing in Mar­quette in Michigan’s upper penin­sula. I met his plane at Detroit’s Metro Air­port and we went to an exec­u­tive hanger and got in a four seater for the flight north. I was in the co-pilot seat con­sciously keep­ing my hands in my lap lest I actu­ally touch any of the controls.

    I spent the day tak­ing notes, col­lect­ing busi­ness cards and just stand­ing by in the event any­thing was needed. One of the good Demo­c­ra­tic ladies gave the Sen­a­tor a blue­berry pie and I brought it back to his hotel room.

    The only time he was out of my sight that day was when he said I’m going to call my son, Evan. This was the pre-cell phone era and mak­ing a phone call required the act of find­ing a phone. He made it a point to say that where ever he was he always called his son at the same time every day. That made a huge impres­sion on me. It’s a prac­tice I fol­lowed with my own son.

    At the end of a long day of smooz­ing Sen. Bayh and I had a late din­ner at the Big Boy. He gave me a sly look and said “I don’t think they will miss that fork if you pick it up and put it in your pocket.” I was con­fused. “Don’t you remem­ber, there’s a blue­berry pie back in my room”.

  18. beb said on January 27th, 2010 at 1:01 pm

    Nance, Jeff B., you guys are putting me in the mood to watch His Gal Fri­day. I didn’t think the news­pa­per biz was as out­ra­geous as that movie made it out to be.

    I think the com­ment that O’Keefe ought to have known bet­ter because his dad was a USA has it exactly back­wards. That no crime exists unless a USA decides that it was a crime. I’m not say­ing his father would have refused to pros­e­cute just that there’s a lot of slop and arbi­trari­ness to prosecution.

  19. paddyo' said on January 27th, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    Sue, some­where the black-and-white pho­tos do sur­vive, but not online. I’ve got one framed at home; guess I should scan it or some­thing. A nice pic did run in West­word, Denver’s alt-weekly, with appro­pri­ately snarky cut­line ding­ing both papers. No idea, though, if it’s in any online archive. I sus­pect not, see­ing as mid-December 1989 was still firmly rooted in the Dark Ages of snip-tearsheet-and-file-in-an-envelope news­pa­per archiving.

  20. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 1:31 pm

    Beb,

    When I entered the busi­ness, there were really two kinds of news­pa­per peo­ple. Folks like me and the pro­pri­etress, who had attended jour­nal­ism school, and those who had come by their writ­ing and report­ing skills sim­ply by doing it for many years. Many of those older guys were damned fine reporters and scrib­blers who had a lot to share.

    One guy was famous for writ­ing a story about a high-profile case in which the defen­dant was acquit­ted. The jury had been sequestered, and had gone out to din­ner to an Ital­ian restau­rant before return­ing to pon­der the case. This guy wrote a lead that read some­thing like…“filled with spaghetti bolog­nese and rea­son­able doubt, the jury in the Joe Dokes case found him not guilty.” As Kenny Banyon might say, “This is gold, Jerry, gold!”

    This same fel­low was a hope­less alco­holic by the time I got to Colum­bus, so they tried to squeeze as much work out of him before lunch, when he would retire to the State & 4th Grill for a lunch of gin and tonics.

    Today’s press corps is much bet­ter edu­cated and far bet­ter behaved. I’ll with­hold judg­ment on whether they are as much fun to hang around.

  21. paddyo' said on January 27th, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    Oh — and hey Nance and Jeff B.: Not to get all fedora-and-inky about it, but I’ve always loved the term we all used for those photos-of-the-deceased. It turned up on the daily news bud­get, and in every con­ver­sa­tion between city desk and night cops guy: “Piano art.”

    Who­ever went to see the griev­ing rel­a­tives usu­ally found that their favorite pic of the beloved departed was framed (or suit­able for such) and sat atop the family’s living-room piano (or bureau or man­tel­piece). I guess today it’s, “Wait a sec, I’ve got about 200 pic­tures of him here on my iPhone. What’s your email address?”

    And Beb, “His Gal Fri­day” is won­der­ful, but so is “Dead­line U.S.A.” — Humphrey Bog­art as hard-bitten news­pa­per edi­tor, and the absolute best clos­ing scene for a news­pa­per movie ever:

    Presses rolling with the big expose’, and Bogie shout­ing into the tele­phone to the crime boss sub­ject of said block­buster story:

    “That’s the press, baby, the press, and there’s noth­ing you can do about it, nothing … ”

  22. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on January 27th, 2010 at 1:44 pm

    Or “Cit­i­zen Kane” … (and I unashamedly like “Con­ti­nen­tal Divide,” which did at least do some shoot­ing inside the old Sun-Times newsroom)

  23. moe99 said on January 27th, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    Brian, The pho­tos plus the graphic emails he sent his (unknown to me) girl­friend in TN while we were still mar­ried, and he in his first elec­tion cam­paign mak­ing a big deal about fam­ily val­ues, should do the trick.

  24. brian stouder said on January 27th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    moe — you may get the chance to say to him

    “That’s the press, baby, the press, and there’s noth­ing you can do about it, nothing”

    Make sure to ‘Bogie’ it up, a little

  25. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    Pad­dyo,

    Bogey as an edi­tor kills. It’s a great lit­tle flick. I also have a soft spot in my heart for the dull but earnest Jack Webb film, “30.” There’s a great scene where David Nel­son (Ozzie and Harriet’s kid) is mock­ing the whole enter­prise, which occurs dur­ing a hell­ish rain­storm in Los Ange­les that has swept a young child into the drain sys­tem. Webb deliv­ers this blistering,passionate tirade about the impor­tance of the press and lays the young whelp out in a bed of clover.

    A news­pa­per movie to avoid despite its pedi­gree is Ron Howard’s “The Paper.” Absolute garbage despite a stel­lar cast. Give it a very, very wide berth.

  26. paddyo' said on January 27th, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Hey, no shame in “Con­ti­nen­tal Divide,” JTMMO … the Royko-esque Belushi was a hoot, and as a bonus, the lovely Blair Brown. Every Col­orado 14’ers climber’s end-of-the-trail fantasy …

  27. Dorothy said on January 27th, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    brian @ 1: for some rea­son this line from a Woody Allen movie just popped into my head and I can’t stop smil­ing about it.

    (Woody after hav­ing sex with a woman): That’s the most fun I’ve ever had with­out laughing!

    Speak­ing of hair color, I acci­den­tally switched the chan­nel to Wheel of For­tune last night and noticed that Pat Sajak has become a red­head! Talk about bad dye jobs, it looked ridiculous.

    My hus­band and I love “Con­ti­nen­tal Divide.” Belushi was so good in it, as was Blair Brown. Have you seen her lately? I think I caught her in an episode of Law & Order not long ago.

  28. Deborah said on January 27th, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    I love it when you guys talk about news­pa­per jour­nal­ism. Keep it up.

    More Ver­i­zon woes, I spent another hour on the phone with them today. Ear­lier this week or late last, I got a let­ter from the fraud depart­ment that the phone that was ordered and sent to another address had been removed from my account as not my fault and all was well with the world. But I had still not been sent a bill for what I really owe for nor­mal ser­vices. So today we get a notice via text that our bill is unpaid and our ser­vice is about to be cut off. The total they said we owed still included that phone that was scammed and on top of that some­thing called an equip­ment charge because after 30 days of pur­chase that phone was never acti­vated. I was boil­ing mad that no one even men­tioned the equip­ment charge ear­lier. As soon as this gets straight­ened out I am get­ting an iphone with ATT. Not that ATT is much bet­ter but this is dri­ving me crazy. If you’re think­ing about going with Ver­i­zon, think again.

  29. Jessica said on January 27th, 2010 at 3:18 pm

    On the details thing — any­body remem­ber a sci­ence fic­tion story from the late 60s where a time trav­eler is nabbed because he sits down but doesn’t do that thing guys do where they pluck the top of their trouser legs to pull them up a bit for comfort?

    Fad­ing mem­ory says it is a Hein­lein, but that’s just fad­ing memory.

  30. Sue said on January 27th, 2010 at 3:33 pm

    Deb­o­rah, have you con­sid­ered con­tact­ing your local paper or TV station(s) to see if they have a con­sumer advo­cate? The threat of tv or print expo­sure some­times gets things mov­ing before a com­pany has a chance to ruin your credit rating.

  31. Dexter said on January 27th, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    My vote goes to Bogie. That was a great film; TCM showed it last fall.
    This has been a great thread. Thanks to you folks who shared your J-stories, very enjoy­able read­ing.
    The first TV edi­tor from my child­hood was the great John Hamil­ton, Perry (DON’T call me CHIEF!!) White of the Metrop­o­lis Daily Planet. I loved the Mike Peters anec­dote that nance posted.

    I see it’s almost a year yet until The Gray Lady starts a mod­est pay-to-read plan. It won’t be at all like the failed Times­S­e­lect deal. Only reg­u­lar read­ers will be made to pay. We’ll get a few hits for free per month, then access will be denied until we pony up. Fair enough.

  32. Bob (not Greene) said on January 27th, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Oh my God, O’Keefe is such a sanc­ti­mo­nious, self-righteous doofus:

    Asked to com­ment, O’Keefe said only, “Ver­i­tas,” which is Latin for “truth.”

    This is what hap­pens when you start believ­ing your press clip­pings. Dope.

  33. ROgirl said on January 27th, 2010 at 3:59 pm

    Dorothy, I’ve been try­ing to fig­ure out why Pat looks so funny lately (he was on celebrity Jeop­ardy and did really well). I thought his head and face were look­ing kind of squinched into each other and the fore­head is very wide and unlined. Maybe he’s had some work done, too.
    http://​com​mons​.wiki​me​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​F​i​l​e​:​P​a​t​-​S​a​j​ak.jpg

  34. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 4:15 pm

    Well, here’s another rea­son I’m not unhappy to be out of jour­nal­ism. Mr. O’Keefe declares him­self “a jour­nal­ist.” Yep. And I am the Queen of France. Honest.

  35. paddyo' said on January 27th, 2010 at 4:23 pm

    I’m with you, Dex­ter — I get home deliv­ery, 7 days a week, of the NYT, and it’s ridicu­lously expen­sive. But I love that damned paper, and if I can just wean myself from the idea of the newsprint by then and still pay fairly for the online con­tent, I’ll prob­a­bly go that way come 2011.

    Except, maybe, for the Sun­day dead-tree edi­tion, even if it’s no longer quite the whale-sized mound of infor­ma­tion that it once was.

    Actu­ally, the Sun­day LA Times WAS called “the whale” back in the day. A mighty Cetacean of paper and ink, it landed on your porch (or in my dad’s gera­ni­ums) like a beached whale. Hell, it prob­a­bly made the Richter Scale jump, too.

  36. brian stouder said on January 27th, 2010 at 4:24 pm

    This is what hap­pens when you start believ­ing your press clip­pings. Dope.

    Thought exper­i­ment:

    Imag­ine if some self-righteous black fel­low had been caught doing exactly the same thing at Sen­a­tor McConnell’s office, as this O’Keefe oaf and his crew of screw-ups were attempt­ing at Sen­a­tor Landrieu’s. Fur­ther imag­ine that one of the self-righteous fellow’s col­leagues was the son of a pub­lic offi­cial that the White House was defend­ing against replace­ment; or — for that mat­ter, that the kid was related to Rev Wright in some way.

    And just to top it off, imag­ine our black ring-leader declar­ing him­self a ‘free­dom fighter for the truth’, and that he was given to pithy one-word dec­la­ra­tions (maybe instead of the slightly snooty “ver­i­tas”, he would say some­thing slightly gritty like “truth bomb”)

    What would be hap­pen­ing, right now?

    My guess is that the right-wing air waves would be black with screech­ing fly­ing mon­keys, and Fox News would again be directly orga­niz­ing street thugs to carry silly signs and spew hate, and McConnell (et al) would be toss­ing off remarks about “What did the White House know, and when did they know it?”, etc etc etc

    Just thought this was worth men­tion­ing. so that we can stay fair and bal­anced in our reac­tion to Fox-gate.

    edit: on the other hand, there’s the “There’s some­thing going on” crowd, like this

    http://​ron​bosol​dier​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​0​/​0​1​/​o​k​e​e​f​e​-​b​u​s​t​e​d​-​t​h​e​r​e​s​-​s​o​m​e​t​h​i​n​g.html

  37. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    Those look­ing to wal­low in the sad plight of James O’Keefe might want to visit Face­book. Some­one has set up a page sug­gest­ing Mr. O’Keefe be water­boarded and the num­ber of vol­un­teers for this duty is ris­ing hourly.

  38. Ronbo said on January 27th, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    Like I said in the arti­cle from my blog you linked to -

    “Sen­a­tor Lan­drieu was con­cerned that her offices had been bugged by FBI, on Holder’s orders? (and there­fore on Obama’s orders?).

    Some­how this con­cern was com­mu­ni­cated to William J. Flana­gan (US attor­ney for west­ern Louisiana).

    In turn, he acci­den­tally or pur­posely reveal this infor­ma­tion to his son, Robert.

    Robert then con­spired with O’Keefe and a cou­ple of other con­ser­v­a­tive wise-guys to reveal the FBI wire­tap­ping operation.

    Their plan? A pur­posely clumsy attempt to pose as tele­phone repair­men and tam­per with the phones. They knew that if the FBI had wire­tapped the phones, the FBI would be there in a mat­ter of minutes.

    At which point O’Keefe would use his cell phone to make a video of the FBI agents show­ing up.

    In other words, O’Keefe, etc may have been spring­ing a trap.”

    It looks like Ole Jimmy O’Keefe has taken a leaf out of the Water­gate play­book and turned it against you guys, and boy are you are folks yelling FOUL!

    Turn­about is fair play in love and civil war.

    What Ole Jimmy did down Dixie way may have started the ball rolling for impeach­ment of Obama in Phonegate.

  39. joodyb said on January 27th, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    more re hair color, because yes, i am just that super­fi­cial: Here in the land of 10,000 blonds, I’ve been told more than once that nat­ural (scando-type) blondes/blonds darken as they age, sted of gray­ing. i have no sci­en­tific basis in fact for this.
    more ger­mane trivia: present AP style dic­tates that ‘blond’ is the term for a male with blond hair as well as the adj form; ‘blonde’ is the noun for females.

  40. Dexter said on January 27th, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    pad­dyo’ :
    Keep up with the Sun­day Times. That will qual­ify you for all-access online con­tent, the way the plans cur­rently are laid out for 2011.

    Any­body like Jazz? Diana Krall:

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​3​m​x​5​-​p​Q​7​D​2​k​&​a​m​p;NR=1

  41. Jeff Borden said on January 27th, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    I won­der if any­one in the NN.C com­mu­nity can come up with a great name for these four brave* young con­ser­v­a­tive war­riors? The best I can con­jure is the thor­oughly hack­neyed Four Stooges.

    *not brave enough to enlist, of course, because they are too valu­able to the con­ser­v­a­tive move­ment, lol.

  42. brian stouder said on January 27th, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    Well, I cheated and went to this site for some Louisiana lingo -

    http://​www​.theeasy​trav​eler​.com/​c​a​j​u​n​/​c​_​l​i​n​go.htm

    and came up with

    1. The self–Boucherie Crew (pro­nounced “BOO sher ee”)

    2. The Gumbo Ya Ya Gang

    3. The Pauve ti bete teabag­gers (POVE tee bet)

    1. Boucherie: a coop­er­a­tive slaugh­ter­ing with each mem­ber fur­nish­ing his share of the animals

    2. Gumbo Ya Ya: When every­body talks at once

    3. Pauve ti bete: Poor lit­tle thing

    I think #2 is the one I’d pick

  43. Rana said on January 27th, 2010 at 8:00 pm

    Jes­sica, that does sound like the kind of thing Hein­lein might have written.

    It also reminds me of that bit in Huck­le­berry Finn? Tom Sawyer? where the male pro­tag­o­nist is hid­ing by dress­ing in girls’ cloth­ing, but flubs it when a ball is tossed to him. He brings his knees together to catch it (he is sit­ting) while a girl of that time would have opened her knees to allow it to land in her skirt. As a kid I always found that inter­est­ing, because I would have done the “boy” thing, not hav­ing grown up wear­ing noth­ing but skirts.

  44. brian stouder said on January 27th, 2010 at 8:04 pm

    And speak­ing of the Gumbo Ya Ya gang — it appears that the gumbo will con­tinue to thicken

    http://​blog​.newsweek​.com/​b​l​o​g​s​/​d​e​c​l​a​s​s​i​f​i​e​d​/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​/​2​0​1​0​/​0​1​/​2​7​/​a​c​c​u​s​e​d​-​l​o​u​i​s​i​a​n​a​-​c​o​-​c​o​n​s​p​i​r​a​t​o​r​-​h​e​l​p​e​d​-​r​u​n​-​a​c​a​d​e​m​i​c​-​p​r​o​g​r​a​m​-​f​u​n​d​e​d​-​b​y​-​u​-​s​-​i​n​t​e​l​l​i​g​e​n​c​e.aspx

    the lead:

    One of four men arrested on Tues­day for attempt­ing to inter­fere with the tele­phones at the New Orleans office of Sen. Mary Lan­drieu pre­vi­ously worked for a U.S. intelligence-funded pro­gram to train would-be Amer­i­can spies, Declas­si­fied has learned.

    One more excerpt:

    Online post­ings indi­cate that in April 2008 the pro­gram held a “col­lo­quium” on “intel­li­gence sup­port for the War on Ter­ror­ism” at which at least three serv­ing intel­li­gence offi­cials spoke: Ted Gis­taro, the top ter­ror­ism ana­lyst on the National Intel­li­gence Coun­cil; an offi­cial named Joe Brit­tain of the National Coun­tert­er­ror­ism Cen­ter; and an unnamed rep­re­sen­ta­tive from WINPAC, a CIA office respon­si­ble for col­lect­ing and ana­lyz­ing intel­li­gence related to weapons of mass destruc­tion. The day­long event ended with a recep­tion fea­tur­ing recruiters from var­i­ous U.S. agen­cies, includ­ing NSA, CIA, and the Defense Intel­li­gence Agency. Dai’s e-mail is listed on the pro­gram as a con­tact point for the sym­po­sium. Pauley said that she did not know what qual­i­fi­ca­tions Dai had when he was hired to be the program’s assis­tant direc­tor, and she said that he left Trin­ity when the DNI grant that financed it ended. She said the pro­gram was entirely funded by money from the intel­li­gence czar’s office. Other online post­ings, some of which are linked here indi­cate that Dai was a speaker at a “CIA day” last sum­mer that was arranged by George­town University’s “Junior States­men Sum­mer School”.

    things that make you go “hmmmmmmmm”

    (if this was a dime novel, this screwed up Op at the Fed­eral build­ing would lead straight back to Dick Cheney’s undead/rogue/shadow gov­ern­men­tal apparatus)

  45. Sue said on January 27th, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    You can call them the Po’ Boys, because poor boys is how this will be spun, but that’s an insult to Louisiana cui­sine. Some­thing ref­er­enc­ing the Vil­lage Peo­ple would be amus­ing, but I’m not cre­ative that way. Coo­zledad, step up, please.

  46. beb said on January 27th, 2010 at 9:10 pm

    The Gang That Couldn’t Wire­tap straight.

  47. coozledad said on January 27th, 2010 at 10:42 pm

    The only thing I can come up with is “Pimpz 2 Line­men 2 McNuggets”.
    “I am a line­man for the party
    and I’ve got no defense
    My lawyer’s reach­ing up his ass for some­thing that makes sense.
    We thought we’d tap into some wires
    we thought we’d get a show on Fox
    Now we’re Chicken McNuggets
    When we’re not bust­ing rocks.”

  48. Linda said on January 27th, 2010 at 10:50 pm

    James Wol­cott said it best:
    I mean, what are the odds that a white con­ser­v­a­tive provo­ca­teur dress­ing up in a pimp out­fit might be judgment-impaired, huh?

  49. alex said on January 27th, 2010 at 11:50 pm

    Gumbo Ya Ya. Sounds like OB/GYN war sto­ries, kinda like the journos rem­i­nisc­ing above.

  50. Dexter said on January 28th, 2010 at 2:25 am

    Before any­one gets all upset over the inter­net storm Chris Matthews cre­ated last night with his “…I for­got he was black…” rant, see the clar­i­fi­ca­tion he made on Rachel Maddow’s show a lit­tle later. Matthews is a good guy, not a racist or dum­b­ass.
    The clarification:

    http://​the​cau​cus​.blogs​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​1​0​/​0​1​/​2​8​/​m​s​n​b​c​s​-​m​a​t​t​h​e​w​s​-​i​-​f​o​r​g​o​t​-​h​e​-​w​a​s​-​b​l​a​ck/?hp

  51. beb said on January 28th, 2010 at 7:55 am

    Chris matthews is like a guy with Tourettes. He just spon­ta­neously blurts out these dis­turb­ing offence com­ments. He should be retired.

    I can’t bear to lis­ten to polit­i­cans give speeches so I never watch SOTU addresses. On the other hand I really loved the trans­la­tion of the speech given by cul­ture­oftruth at
    http://​moon​shinepa​triot​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​0​/​0​1​/​s​t​a​t​e​-​o​f​-​u​n​i​o​n​-​a​d​d​r​e​s​s​-​p​r​e​s​i​d​e​n​t​-​b​a​r​a​c​k.html

  52. brian stouder said on January 28th, 2010 at 8:23 am

    I saw Chris’s moment, and it made me wince, too.

    Beb is right — Matthews gets on a roll and blurts things out in a sort of free-verse style. On his daily show, he asks a ques­tion of this or that guest, and then bar­rels right over any attempt they might make at an answer — so as to deliver his own.

    After Pres­i­dent Obama’s address, Matthews was keyed-up and excited, and in com­pli­ment­ing the president’s efforts he made that ham-fisted racial ref­er­ence, from which there was no good road back out again.

    But I do enjoy set-piece polit­i­cal oratory!

  53. Ricardo said on February 1st, 2010 at 12:23 am

    I hope they make O’Keefe wear that fur coat when he is in prison.

Leave a Reply