nancynall.com » An internet diet.

An internet diet.

Ms. Lipp­man claims to be on an inter­net diet. As she is a very dis­ci­plined per­son, I believe it. (I add that I’m hon­ored she includes this site in her restricted surf­ing, par­tic­u­larly con­sid­er­ing it has no sup­ple­men­tal vit­a­min or min­er­als.) What’s more, I think she’s on to some­thing. I didn’t miss the inter­net (too much) dur­ing our vaca­tion, and I’m think­ing I want to be more ana­log for a while.

So I’m going on a diet. I will not be neglect­ing this site. Too much. Same daily updates, per­haps less blog­gage. Maybe you won’t notice it at all, but I’m going to restrict my time spent a) blog­ging and b) look­ing for things to blog about to 45 min­utes a day, 60 at most. I have a few writ­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties I want to explore, and if the mile of tomb­stones* this year has reminded me of any­thing, it’s that we don’t have all the time in the world, just some of it. Wouldn’t it be stu­pid to lie on your deathbed and think, “I spent it all blog­ging”? I think so.

Also, I need to do more video. Even though I am unem­ploy­able by tra­di­tional media, I like to keep the skills sharp.

What I mainly think I’m going to do is stop read­ing the sites that bug me. While there’s a cer­tain scab-picking sat­is­fac­tion in see­ing What That Idiot Has to Say Today, it’s just, alas, a waste of time. So long, Jim Lileks. Au revoir, Rod Dreher. Farewell, about a dozen other blogs. It was fun while it lasted, and besides, I’m still read­ing Roy, who will keep us updated on the high­lights.

* turn of phrase bor­rowed from Thomas McGuane, who used it as the title of an essay about a rash of deaths in his fam­ily

OK, then. What a nice week­end. Spent it at East­ern Mar­ket (July! Time for corn, peaches, snow peas, bok choy, sugar snaps, toma­toes, beets, weensy lit­tle car­rots and yes I made two trips to the car), sail­ing, moviego­ing (“Jour­ney to the Cen­ter of the Earth,” which will go on my parental-duty ros­ter in the plus col­umn, but oth­er­wise be entirely for­got­ten in a mat­ter of days) and, Sun­day, a Tigers game. As a recent trans­plant, I really don’t give a crap about the Tiger Sta­dium demo­li­tion, despite the Free Press’ ded­i­ca­tion to cov­er­ing every swing of the wreck­ing ball, and besides, Com­er­ica is hardly a dump. It was hot and sweaty in the sun, but the seats were great (thanks, Michael and Diane) and the Tigers won. Pudge Rodriguez went four-for-four — a Hot Pudge Sun­day — and there were a cou­ple of nice homers. And the heat wasn’t even that bad; for­tu­nately, there was beer.

Fri­day night at the movies was some­thing else, how­ever — we went to the 5 p.m. show and came out in the midst of Macomb County Fri­day Night, a vast gath­er­ing at a new “lifestyle cen­ter” mall up in the north­ern ‘burbs. “Lifestyle cen­ter” = open-air. Their gim­mick is, they allow dogs, and every time I go there I won­der if this will be the day dis­as­ter strikes. Because there are an awful lot of stu­pid peo­ple in the world, peo­ple who think dogs “enjoy” a Fri­day night spent strolling at the mall, in the com­pany of hun­dreds of peo­ple and dozens of strange dogs, some of which are barely under con­trol in the first place. Since we were last there the mall added an out­door splash foun­tain and climbable play area, so add a bunch of tod­dlers to the mix, too. Every time I go there I wit­ness at least one dog argu­ment barely avoided, some­times between, oh, an 80-pound boxer and a 100-pound lab, both strain­ing at the ends of their leashes, which are held by 110-pound women who sim­ply don’t have a clue. About any­thing.

Also, these trips enable me to see how many peo­ple think it is nor­mal and admirable to put clothes on dogs. I’m not talk­ing a ban­danna around the neck, either. I ask you.

So, a lit­tle bit of blog­gage:

Mitch Albom, I beg you, take the buy­out. A grate­ful read­er­ship would thank you. I would, any­way.

And one final house­keep­ing note: This week is when I’m col­lect­ing the last of my doctor’s 50th-birthday presents, the one that requires a spe­cial diet, Miralax and gen­eral anes­the­sia. So if I dis­ap­pear for a cou­ple of days, please try not to pic­ture what I’ll be doing. ‘kay?

37 responses to
“An internet diet.”

  1. Dorothy said on July 28th, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Speak­ing of dogs, how’s Spriggy since last week?

  2. nancy said on July 28th, 2008 at 10:26 am

    Bet­ter, thanks. Plump­ing back up, still eat­ing like a lit­tle hog. I don’t think we’ll leave him for that long again. He’s just not up for it any­more.

  3. LAMary said on July 28th, 2008 at 10:47 am

    I love see­ing dogs dressed in Juicy Cou­ture out­fits, car­ried through Nord­stroms either in lit­tle Louis Vuit­ton dog­gie totes or under their mistress’s arm. I’m think­ing of doing this with Max if I can find Juicy Cou­ture dog­gie clothes for 140 pound boxer/dane mixes.
    Peo­ple, dogs do not want to be car­ried around or walked through shop­ping malls unless they can scav­enge the food court.
    Two years ago I went to the LA Auto show with the kids and inhouse Brit. In the ladies’ room there was a woman with a chi­huahua. The dog had crapped all over the inte­rior of the pricey dog­gie car­rier and the woman was wash­ing it out into the ladies’ room sink. Dog diar­rhea in the sink where I needed to wash my hands. This is just wrong. I love dogs a lot but I wouldn’t take them to the auto show and I wouldn’t expect peo­ple to tol­er­ate my dump­ing their crap into the sink.

  4. Sue said on July 28th, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Daisy the Ger­man short­hair mix is cur­rently vis­it­ing us while her own­ers are up north for a week. Com­pat­i­ble house­holds, of course: Daisy will be sleep­ing with us and hog­ging the couch just like she does at her real house. If you don’t mind the long drive to drop him off, Spriggy is wel­come here any­time. He won’t lose weight, I promise.

  5. coozledad said on July 28th, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Roy’s a good one to stick with. I’m still laugh­ing at the image of Jonah Gold­berg in a press box with a bat up his ass.

  6. ellen said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:27 pm

    I had that “birth­day gift” a cou­ple of weeks ago. Best advice some­one gave to me: Make the “spe­cial drink” the night before and chill it in the fridge. Keep it as cold as pos­si­ble and drink it over a lot of ice. It goes down a lot eas­ier that way. Also, if you are lucky, you will be done in 3 liters, instead of the full 4. The actual pro­ce­dure was noth­ing. A pleas­ant nap, just like a pre­vi­ous com­menter here (LAMary? Dorothy?) said it would be. And the rest of the after­noon was a nice haze, too. I have no mem­ory of that day at all.

  7. Julie Robinson said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:31 pm

    Gen­eral anes­the­sia? It was just a local when a cer­tain sig­nif­i­cant other in my life had it done. That’s what I was count­ing on when it’s my turn in Sep­tem­ber. Gen­eral anes­the­sia scares the crap out of me. No pun intended.

  8. Dorothy said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    The prep is worse than the pro­ce­dure. I have no mem­ory of the pro­ce­dure. I must have been nice and drowsy to not even real­ize what hap­pened. And after­wards I felt just fine. In 5.5 years I will prob­a­bly have another, and not be nearly as full of trep­i­da­tion as the first one was.

    And Julie, even if it was unin­tended, it was a fun pun!

  9. Sue said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    Julie, I think it’s a twi­light kind of thing usu­ally, nei­ther local nor gen­eral. An iv is started and you get an injec­tion, which makes you very sleepy and helps you not to remem­ber any­thing. No intu­ba­tion, no anes­the­si­ol­o­gist. Talk to your doc.

  10. nancy said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Per­haps “gen­eral anes­the­sia” is a med­ical term, but I under­stand it to be any pro­ce­dure where you’re all the way knocked out, as opposed to awake. Sue is right — they told me it would be some sort of knock-out drug but I’d be breath­ing on my own.

  11. Connie said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

    I am just back from eight days with not only no inter­net, but no cell phone sig­nal with­out a drive as well. Missed the inter­net very lit­tle which sur­prised me.

    Our old man Shih Tzu stayed home with the kid – who turned 21 yes­ter­day. The kid, not the dog. The dog is suf­fer­ing from severe arthri­tis and con­ges­tive heart fail­ure and we know we are going to have make the big sleep deci­sion some­time soon.

    Glen Lake Sleep­ing Bear was won­der­ful as always, despite the over­cast nights – no star gaz­ing all week. We spent way less than usual, mostly because there were no sead­oos to gas up.

    Back to work this a.m., to find ONLY two man­agers wait­ing for me to dis­cuss what­ever it is went on in their dept while I was gone.

  12. Sue said on July 28th, 2008 at 12:58 pm

    Just fin­ished my first can­ning batch for the sea­son – cur­rant jelly. This has got to be the lat­est first ever. We have one tomato that is almost ripe, and our first green beans (the three plants that sur­vived the sec­ond flood) are about 1/2 inch long. Any day now! We bought our first local corn yes­ter­day – it’s up to almost $6 a dozen this year, almost dou­ble last year’s price. And it wasn’t very good, either; kind of like what you used to get before they started plant­ing the super­sweets.

  13. Mindy said on July 28th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    Looks like I’ve been on an inter­net diet for six months at least. Never thought of it as such, though. So far I’ve gained a much cleaner house, a few com­pleted nov­els, and time to knit. The cur­rent project will be off the nee­dles in plenty of time for fall. It was sup­posed to be ready for fall of 2006. But I was surf­ing.
    http://​www​.berroco​.com/​e​x​c​l​u​s​i​v​e​s​/​p​i​c​c​h​u​/​p​i​c​c​h​u.html

    I’ve also man­aged to spend plenty of my found time drink­ing wine on the deck in the beau­ti­ful weather we’ve had lately. But it’s a love­lier and more relax­ing way to waste time. I hope you gain at least as much on your diet as I have on mine.

  14. moe99 said on July 28th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    Well my old­est son spent the night at The Hamp­ton Inn next to the Detroit air­port due to what was billed as weather prob­lems back in NYC. Really. Thought of doing a call out here in case he couldn’t find a place to stay, but it all turned out ok. So far. He thought I was a bit over the top when I told him, all 22 years of him, that he could NOT go wan­der around Detroit proper at night. He’s really only expe­ri­enced Seat­tle, the Twin Cities, and a bit of the cleaned up NYC so he has no idea what’s out there.

  15. ellen said on July 28th, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    You aren’t knocked out; you are sedated via IV. You are not uncon­scious, because, as my gas­troen­terol­o­gist explained, they might need to ask you to shift your posi­tion slightly dur­ing the pro­ce­dure. You are awake and the thing is hap­pen­ing, but you are so doped up you don’t know/care, you don’t feel any­thing, and you have no mem­ory of it after­ward. I think they do vasec­tomies the same way.

  16. coozledad said on July 28th, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    That’s always been one of my fears. They give me the IV Val­ium and Demerol drip, and the well worn door­mat of my opi­ate recep­tors says “That’s pretty good. I’ll have another when you get a chance”. And I wind up feel­ing the entire pro­ce­dure.

  17. Gasman said on July 28th, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    Nancy,
    I’ve seen you fre­quently rant about Mitch Albom, how­ever, as I don’t read his stuff very often, I’ve not not been too offended by him. His cur­rent col­umn is some­thing to behold. If this is typ­i­cal Albom, I under­stand your rants. Takes up much space with­out actu­ally writ­ing very much.

    Must.

    Have.

    Been.

    Short.

    Of.

    Ideas.

  18. nancy said on July 28th, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    That’s pretty typ­i­cal for the non-sports stuff, which is all I read of his. Take a topic, stake out a pretty safe posi­tion on it, find a catch phrase you can repeat every three grafs, add white space.

    He’s prob­a­bly knock­ing down about 300K from the paper alone for that.

  19. brian stouder said on July 28th, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    So if I dis­ap­pear for a cou­ple of days, please try not to pic­ture what I’ll be doing.

    Just wanted to com­ment on the ele­gant con­struc­tion of this post, with the inter­net purge clev­erly con­nected to the joke at the end, mak­ing for an inter­est­ing post all around!

    My own tol­er­ance of silly bull***t is declin­ing just as rapidly as my age is advanc­ing, and the inter­net is basi­cally a big cow pas­ture, when it comes to loads of dung just wait­ing for your bare feet. Con­se­quently, the end­less polit­i­cal cow­pie sites turn me off (after spend­ing years romp­ing around in a few of them) pretty com­pletely. This web­site, plus msnbc news is most often where I go. (and true enough, I’ll fol­low links from here to else­where some­times). The BBC F1 site is another occa­sional stop.

    I can see how lots of the stuff on the inter­net glit­ters and charms young folks; it’s all so new and dif­fer­ent and odd and “in” and excit­ing. But in the end, it has no more charms than have always existed, whether in books or hap­pen­ings or the sto­ries our friends tell us (and indeed, the inter­net is no more truth­ful than any of those other sources!)

    Sat­ur­day Grant and I were at the Indi­anapo­lis Motor Speed­way for qual­i­fy­ing and prac­tice (while the girls ran off to the Children’s Museum; Pam posted some pic­tures); a long, hot, enter­tain­ing day. Late in the after­noon, hoots and hollers arose off to my right, and I saw a very attrac­tive, well built and fairly drunk blonde, and her more com­pletely drunk, buzz-headed, 6-pack ab hus­band or boyfriend came into view, and the attrac­tive blonde pulled her strap­less top down, and actively dis­played her undu­lat­ing breasts. Great stuff! She was very well built, and had a fair amount of stage­craft, as she then popped her top right back up again. But they were work­ing their way toward us, and the nov­elty wore off after the 6th or 7th time she revealed her­self – so that I was begin­ning to feel more like a con­cerned dad than a guy who just won five dol­lars on a lot­tery ticket. Ulti­mately they sat within 40 feet of us, on the same row in the bleach­ers, where the act con­tin­ued; she teased and moved and flashed – on cue from her man, who was wear­ing a bizarre $40 Ed Hardy tee shirt (I Googled Ed Hardy later, and learned about it) as he cir­cu­lated amongst other fans and spoke to them about….who knows what? Seri­ously, she looked too good, and he was act­ing too strangely. Were they drum­ming up busi­ness for a gentleman’s club? What­ever the game was, it got old in a hurry, to me, but not to Grant! (Yes – the bot­tom­line is – I’m get­ting old!)

  20. Jen said on July 28th, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    Nancy: Dave Barry wrote a col­umn back in Feb­ru­ary about the same pro­ce­dure you’re going to have. I thought it was amus­ing but, being only 23, I haven’t expe­ri­enced that “joy” yet. My edi­tor, who is over 50, said he hadn’t laughed so hard in years as he did read­ing the col­umn. It’s here: http://​www​.miami​her​ald​.com/​5​4​8​/​s​t​o​r​y​/​4​2​7​6​0​3.html

    Mitch Albom strikes me as a HUGE snot. I don’t think big-name actors are doing comic book movies because it’s the only thing Hol­ly­wood will do, or because it’s the only way they get paid. They’re doing it because the movies are MUCH bet­ter than they were. Come on – “The Dark Knight” is writ­ten bet­ter than the ’60s TV show and its movie (which I also loved). And it’s not like it’s a really new thing, either. Jack Nichol­son was already known as a good actor in 1989 when he played the Joker in Tim Burton’s “Bat­man.” It’s not like it’s a new phe­nom­e­non. Just because a movie is based on a comic book does not mean it can’t be a good story. What a turd!

    Inci­den­tally, your read­ing of Mitch Albom columns, since you know you’re just going to get ticked, reminds me of my father, who reads a cer­tain colum­nist in a cer­tain news­pa­per every week just because he hates the columnist’s writ­ing SO much and loves to rant about it.

  21. James said on July 28th, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    “I think they do vasec­tomies the same way.”

    No. You get a local, and are fully aware. Trust me. The doc­tor was teach­ing some young lady how to do the pro­ce­dure dur­ing mine, 16 years ago or so…

  22. Sue said on July 28th, 2008 at 4:04 pm

    Loved Dave Barry’s col­umn. He’s absolutely right about wak­ing up feel­ing mel­low. That’s nii­i­ice.
    The office I work in reviews sub­mit­tals for sub­di­vi­sions in our city. One ren­der­ing that came in sev­eral years ago reminded me stongly of the large intes­tine. Really. There was an ascend­ing, trans­verse and descend­ing part, plus a large area of green space right in the mid­dle where the small intes­tine would nor­mally be shoved. The only thing miss­ing was a tiny cul-de-sac where the appen­dix should be. Plus it was back­wards. Since “Rela­tion­ship to Human Anatomy” is not one of the review cri­te­ria, I didn’t bring it up to my boss.

  23. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 28th, 2008 at 5:07 pm

    Nancy, not true on yer blog hav­ing “no sup­ple­men­tal vit­a­min or min­er­als;” isn’t there a full rec­om­mended daily allowance of Irony in each serv­ing?

  24. Dexter said on July 28th, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    I remem­ber when Mitch came to the Freep, replac­ing Mike Downey, who moved to the LA Times and is now writ­ing “In the Wake of the News” for da Trib in Chicago, which is a hal­lowed posi­tion given to a sports sage with great respect by peer and reader alike.
    I really like Downey but quickly warmed up to Mitch and read every col­umn for years . He did great work , giv­ing bal­ance to sto­ries and assump­tions ,”bad raps” about con­tro­ver­sial ath­letes like Chris Web­ber.
    I was a fan of his radio show on WJR but now I never lis­ten to that crummy right wing sta­tion.
    I was moved by “…Maury” and Eddie, the car­ni­val worker in “…Heaven”.
    In the past few years I only occa­sion­ally read his stuff, though, and this col­umn Nancy linked and oth­ers lately are the rea­sons why.
    I am still a fan of his; I have never seen his B’way plays, but I like his NYC based columns. His col­umn on the great Bobby Short and the Car­lyle Hotel lounge was my favorite. I could just hear Short telling of Hilde­gard and other sto­ries.
    For those of you who have had enough, take plea­sure in know­ing that one man who was not a fan had a solu­tion for his frus­tra­tions with Mitch. In 1984 Guillermo Her­nan­dez, the best reliever in base­ball , dumped a huge bucket of ice water on Mitch’s head in the Tigers’ locker room. Mitch still hates that fucker for that. He wrote about it for years.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The drug is Ver­set, some­times com­bined w/Demerol. I was ner­vous as a whore-in-church before, for no rea­son. My doc was late and I was on the table for 45 min­utes mak­ing small talk with two nurses and the doc arrived, the nurse says, “here comes the good stuff”, drip drip, and off to “Twi­light Land”. I do recall a sound like a far-off sewer-digging machine, then it was over and I was mak­ing claims the doc­tor wanted to see me in his office right away…I had dreamed it. And I do recall I was asked to shift posi­tions once some­time dur­ing the pro­ce­dure. I go to the den­tist reg­u­larly, and the c-scope was eas­ier than ANY den­tist visit.

  25. brian stouder said on July 28th, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    a total non-sequitur: I just got the notice in the mail for the 23rd annual Lin­coln Col­lo­quium, which will com­mem­o­rate the 150th anniver­sary of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, and which fea­tures lec­tures by Dou­glas Wil­son, Rod­ney Davis, Allen Guelzo, James McPher­son, Garry Wills, and David Zaref­sky.

    It will be held at Knox Col­lege at Gales­burg, Illi­nois on Octo­ber 11 (a Saturday)….and wild horses couldn’t keep me away!!

    It sounds like it will be absolutely and won­der­fully enthralling, com­ing as it does amidst the dec­sive stages of our pres­i­den­tial election…and the cost is $25!!! (For a com­par­i­son, I paid $40 – after pop­corn and pop got added, to take the young folks to Dark Knight)….but I sup­pose I’ll come home with sev­eral more great books to read, so that has to be fac­tored in

  26. Connie said on July 28th, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    So why are you unem­ploy­able by tra­di­tional media? Surely not the Albom bash­ing.

  27. Linda said on July 28th, 2008 at 9:33 pm

    I can under­stand the inter­net diet. I stayed away from a web­site full of idiots for Lent. It was great. Gave me a new per­spec­tive. And I believe Roy exists so that we don’t have to read wingnut idiots.

  28. del said on July 28th, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    I often think of the Willie Her­nan­dez episode. Albom had some rather unkind things to say about Willie — who had reverted to his birth name, Guillermo, a deci­sion that Albom found silly as I recall. A writer can wound with his words. And after the ice-bath Albom was on a per­pet­ual rant against Her­nan­dez.

  29. Dexter said on July 28th, 2008 at 11:58 pm

    We all know the bees are going away. In China , they have to pol­li­nate the fruit trees by hand.
    Can you imag­ine that? Talk about labor-intensive!
    And I still miss Joe Strum­mer. Here he laments about the bees.
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​9​p​Y​w​P​c6UNmo

  30. MarkH said on July 29th, 2008 at 2:59 am

    Jen, thanks for shar­ing the Barry col­umn; a hoot, and very accu­rate, as was Ellen’s descrip­tion.

    I had mine two years ago, at 54, and the prep was def­i­nitely worse than the pro­ce­dure. In addi­tion to the pre­vi­ous night’s evac­u­a­tion pro­ce­dure, there was a prep IV prior to the real anethe­sia, and, as the nurse warned, it burned going in my wrist. Then I was out, and woke up a sec­ond later, it seemed. Smiles all around; a healthy colon, aside from a slight “ulcer­iza­tion”, what­ever that was. Good results added to the mel­low­ness. They are exam­in­ing you as the tube exits, with the colon care­fully inflated so the bright light shows the cam­era EVERYTHING. Your colon will never look as clean again, Nancy, so be sure to ask for the pho­tos (well, maybe not).

    You won’t want to do any­thing the rest of the day. My boss tried oth­er­wise and bragged how he came back to work for half a day. My buddy here con­firmed he did come back, but he was worth­less and looked like hell.

    On the flip side, as of last week, I am help­ing my close friend deal with a likely diag­no­sis of the worst news. He had symp­toms recently, and at only 45, had not con­sid­ered he needed the colonoscopy. After ini­tial tests, he was told by his doc­tor to pre­pare him­self as he goes to Billings next week for the colonoscopy, and get the final deter­mi­na­tion. I’m pray­ing for him, as his father passed away last Christ­mas from a malig­nant brain tumor.

  31. John said on July 29th, 2008 at 7:54 am

    Brian,

    We all looked at the pic­tures from the play­ground on fire, but when you finally get an eye-popping photo op, you don’t pro­vide did­dley!

    John

  32. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on July 29th, 2008 at 8:25 am

    If you dis­like foul lan­guage, don’t click this link; if you dis­like being edited, click this link — http://​www​.guardian​.co​.uk/​m​e​d​i​a​/​2​0​0​8​/​j​u​l​/​2​3​/​m​e​d​i​a​monkey

  33. brian stouder said on July 29th, 2008 at 8:44 am

    John – I think that was the first time I went to the speed­way with­out a cam­era!

  34. Kirk said on July 29th, 2008 at 10:35 am

    She leaves a movie trailer, with a “McCain for pres­i­dent” ad right beneath it, and closes off the com­ments. What twisted form of revenge is this?

  35. coozledad said on July 29th, 2008 at 11:02 am

    I already have night­mares about the creep in chief, but I’ll go see it any­way. Stone is actu­ally far too kind:They got an actress to play Babs.

  36. brian stouder said on July 29th, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    The pre­view makes the movie look like a very healthy (for our repub­li­can democ­racy) trip to the dunk tank for the crew cur­rently in power.

    But, fur­ther to our dis­cus­sion about age and cow­pies, we should remem­ber the great con­clud­ing voice-over by George C Scott in the movie Pat­ton:

    For over a thou­sand years Roman con­querors return­ing from the wars enjoyed the honor of tri­umph, a tumul­tuous parade. The con­queror rode in a tri­umphal char­iot, the dazed pris­on­ers [in this case, White House staffers!] walk­ing in chains before him. And a slave stood behind the con­queror hold­ing a golden crown and whis­per­ing in his ear a warn­ing: that all glory is fleet­ing.”

    by way of say­ing, we’ve seen this sort of thing before, and we’ll cer­tainly see it again, if we live long enough

  37. roy edroso said on July 29th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    So, I see, it’s all up to me. Thanks a fuck of a lot. Noth­ing makes this job eas­ier than know­ing one of the smarter peo­ple doesn’t have my back.

    One of these days I’ll accu­mu­late your level of wis­dom and go back to hyp­no­tiz­ing chick­ens. Till then enjoy your new free­dom and spare me a lone­some tear some­times. It’s nasty out here.