nancynall.com » Quel fromage.*

Quel fromage.*

Give Detroit this, peo­ple: It has manly tes­ti­cles, ooz­ing spleen and can’t get out of the bath­room before it needs another shave. Only here can a mayor, indicted on no fewer than 10 felonies, lurch­ing through a nearly year-long scan­dal, seem­ingly need­ing a pry bar to remove him­self from office — only this man, on the day he strikes a deal that calls for res­ig­na­tion and a seven-figure resti­tu­tion and sur­ren­der of his law license and jail time and a five-year probation/moratorium on run­ning for pub­lic office, can say, upon his exit:

“Detroit, you done set me up for a come­back.”

I mean, it’s hilar­i­ous. Isn’t it? How can it not be? It’s true. If this were a slasher movie, this would only be the first time the killer is thought to be dead. He’s got six or seven rean­i­ma­tions left in him, and when he comes out of jail, with his redemp­tion nar­ra­tive, he’ll start rebuild­ing his base. By the time the clock runs out on the five years, well, “tanned, rested and ready” doesn’t really describe it.

I love this town. It’s never bor­ing. You know what else? Peo­ple don’t pos­ture (so much). You get the boil­er­plate shout-outs to God’s will and all, but for the most part peo­ple don’t pre­tend to be Moses here. Pol­i­tics is bare-knuckled, the race card is played so often its cor­ners are cracked and curled, but I like to think at the end of the day every­one can sit down and have a drink. Maybe that’s naive, or just wrong — there was a shov­ing match in a Detroit break­fast place dur­ing the pri­mary sea­son, between mem­bers of oppos­ing can­di­dates’ camps — and maybe it’s pro­jec­tion. Detroit pol­i­tics, with its pan­der bears and open-handed thiev­ery, seems pos­i­tively angelic in com­par­i­son to recent days. Any­way, I’m look­ing for­ward to see­ing “Milk” this fall, the other polit­i­cal movie fea­tur­ing Josh Brolin.

Folks, I be exhausted. I’m steel­ing myself for a bike ride and the wind is blow­ing about 25 knots — my least-favorite fair-weather con­di­tions, but it must be done. So let’s skip to the blog­gage and start the week­end early, eh?

Why do peo­ple even attempt fic­tion, when real life is so much more inter­est­ing? The fas­ci­nat­ing tale of the Aqua­tots.

Be still, my heart: I love the way my new boyfriend Javier says “John Tra­volta.” (Video link.)

The tourism-ization of the shoul­der sea­son: Hal­loween becomes a rea­son to vacation.

I can never write a zom­bie movie like this one, in which the z-virus is spread through…con­ver­sa­tion. Now that’s imaginative.

Off to reignite my own.

* That’s elit­ist for, “How uppity.”

75 responses to
“Quel fromage.*”

  1. Connie said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:47 am

    Never been a zom­bie fan, but I loved the book “World War Z, an Oral His­tory of the Zom­bie Wars” by Max Brooks, son of Mel. Highly recommended.

    Gustav’s remains blew through here yes­ter­day and gave us lots of badly needed rain. My hus­band stood on the deck last night and swore he could see the grass growing.

  2. Dorothy said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:50 am

    Con­nie I love that visual image of your hubby see­ing the grass grow­ing! I think a lit­tle of Gus­tav is headed our way today. We sure need it. We have crunchy grass around these parts.

  3. Julie Robinson said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Even Christ­mas has become Hal­lowe­enized. At last year’s Fes­ti­val of Gin­ger­bread there were three or four Hal­loween entries. Retail­ers just fig­ured out it was another way to sep­a­rate us from our money. And because the aver­age Amer­i­can con­sumer is a sheep, Hal­loween has become huge. What hol­i­day will they push next? Why this month alone we’ve got Grand­par­ents’ Day, Patriot Day, and Cit­i­zen­ship Day com­ing up. The lawn dec­o­ra­tion pos­si­bil­i­ties are endless…

  4. Laura said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Quel fro­mage. Lol. Yes, and wel­come to my hum­ble chapeau.

  5. moe99 said on September 5th, 2008 at 10:26 am

    Appar­ently the tech per­son in charge of the back­drop for McCain’s speech goofed:
    http://​talk​ing​pointsmemo​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2​1​3​8​06.php

  6. LAMary said on September 5th, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Wow, that school is right up the street. I bet a lot of Wal­ter Reed grads were won­der­ing what it had to do with John McCain. It’s a great mag­net school, by the way.

  7. John said on September 5th, 2008 at 11:13 am

    I’m call­ing shenani­gans on Rep. Lynn West­more­land. I’m 5 years younger than him and grew up in the South too. The word “uppity” was a com­monly used epi­thet most fre­quently in con­junc­tion with the N-word. This wasn’t a phrase I heard once a year by semi-literate red­neck, but one I heard on weekly basis in schools, shops, and at church. For the dis­tin­guished con­gress­man to claim that he never heard “uppity” in a racial con­text is utter balderdash!

    By the way, check out Hedo-ween if you want an adult Hal­loween vacation.

  8. brian stouder said on September 5th, 2008 at 11:56 am

    By the way, I agreed with Keith Olbermann’s with­er­ing crit­i­cism of the inap­pro­pri­ate (lit­er­ally dis­grace­ful), pro­tracted use of images of the ter­ror attacks of 7 years ago, for advance­ment of McCravin’s campaign.

    Leav­ing that entirely aside, THIS (EDIT: NSFW!!! thanks, Con­nie; your Librar­ian instincts exceed my hound dog ones!)

    http://​www​.the​sun​.co​.uk/​s​o​l​/​h​o​m​e​p​a​g​e​/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​5​0​7​70.ece

    made me laugh, because of the use of one of Nance’s oft-repeated terms of art, after this lead­ing sentence:

    “LADY Heather McCart­ney posed in depraved porno­graphic clinches which are bound to sicken her estranged hus­band Sir Paul and his army of fans”

    The term of art followed:

    “Many of the images are too explicit to print in a fam­ily newspaper.”

    (the ones the Sun DOES print would never make it into the good ol’ N-S!)

  9. Connie said on September 5th, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    Oh Brian, that one needs to be tagged NSFW.

  10. Jim said on September 5th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

    Are you for­get­ting for­mer Fort Wayne Mayor Win Moses? He was forced to resign for a cam­paign finance scan­dal, then ran in the cau­cus and was re-elected! Granted, Win Moses was no Kwame Kil­patrick … but only in Detroit?? Don’t think so!

  11. caliban said on September 5th, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    In real life, the z-virus is spread through polit­i­cal report­ing. From Jim Vandehei:

    “Tom DeLay, the for­mer House major­ity leader, told us this week that his wife, who is even more con­ser­v­a­tive than he is, doesn’t think much of McCain. But she loves Palin, per­haps enough to get her to now back the GOP ticket. He said he was aston­ished how Palin has woken “the sleep­ing giant: Repub­li­can women.”

    I’ve never had a night­mare. Bevo-hived hordes may do it.

    Detroit has had states­men for may­ors. John C. Lodge, back when Repub­li­cans had souls, noblesse oblige, and the white man’s bur­den, the sort of good Repub­li­can that seems to be extinct. And Cole­man Young, who was canned from a job with Ford for foment­ing labor activ­ity and hav­ing the unmit­i­gated gall (a phrase that will never go out of style when used sar­cas­ti­cally) to think black peo­ple are citizens.

    McCain still thinks Sad­dam teamed up with the Aya­tol­lahs to destroy the WTC. But if he really wanted to pound this into the heads of the moron por­tion of Amer­ica, why didn’t he choose Rudi. Now there’s a phi­lan­der­ing mayor. It could have been 9/11 and “I was tor­tured” alter­nat­ing 24/7.

    McCain claims he could have got­ten med­ical help if he gave up infor­ma­tion. What exactly did he think the Viet Cong could do with any infor­ma­tion he could fess up? I wasn’t there, but how does this make him a hero, except in some Hol­ly­wood Dream? When the polit­i­cal game got rough, he japped (yeah, yeah, I know) on his buddy John Kerry. Sort of, let’s him and you fight. And now he’s built a polit­i­cal cam­paign around get­ting shot down and hav­ing the courage of his mav­er­ick con­vic­tions until things got hairy. Gri­mac­ing poseur and a great can­di­date for Bat­man villain.

    Me and my ‘gal’ (and that’s the polit­i­cally cor­rect term now, right, and she’d kick Sarah’s ass in a heart­beat, and she’d try to kick mine for call­ing her a gal, thank God) always take a vaca­tion for Hal­loween. We watch Under the Vol­cano, take a slurp every time Albert Finney does, and pre­tend it’s the Day of the Dead.

    Any­way, in Detroit, Halloween’s for suck­ers. It’s Devil’s Night when things get seri­ous and the ammo hits the fan.

  12. moe99 said on September 5th, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    DC Mayor, Mar­ion Berry, the cocaine addled jerk, also comes to mind.

  13. caliban said on September 5th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    Best line on the inter­nets today is from Joel Achenbach’s blog on the WaPo site:

    My favorite Tweeter: Thomas Pyn­chon writ­ing “Isn’t that Salinger?”.

    Being read by Michael Moor­cock, I hope.

  14. caliban said on September 5th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    Colos­sal Heads: Chris Matthews is on Jay Leno tonight. Gar­gan­tuan bat­tle of fatu­ous ass­ness. Who gets a thrill going up his leg first. Both will trash Hillary, because no two guys ever mak­ing obsc3ene amounts of mon­eyy for no appar­ent rea­son ever feared emas­cu­la­tion more. Well, there’s Rush, but he’s been singing in the Vienna Boy’s Choir for a while. Some­times a cigar is not a cigar, but wouldn’t he have made a tri­umver­ate of blather?

    Jay Leno used to be, long ago and far away, a decent standup comic. Warmed up for Steven Wright and Denis Leary and Paula Poundstone.

    Who actu­ally watches these shows any­more. None of these guys con­jure up a Dan’l Boone axe to the crotch or a “pet my pussy” moment. There was one foot in the grave War­ren on Let­ter­man. And Craig Ferguson’s mono­logues are insane and some­times they’re really funny. Steve Earle is on Let­ter­man tonight, and he ought to do Snake Oil, for the GOP, or A bible and a Gun, or Amer­ica V. 6.0, or Ellis Unit One for the pro-life hyp­ocrites that believe in ulti­mate vengeance.

  15. Milena Thomas said on September 5th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    Well said. My friend just pointed me to your site. I’m a fan already.

  16. garmoore said on September 5th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    As for politi­cians who used their con­vic­tions as a come­back, how about Edwin Edwards? Remem­ber “Vote for the Crook. It’s Impor­tant,” from when he ran against David Duke?

  17. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 5th, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    Craig Fer­gu­son is not only incred­i­bly funny, but aside from the amaz­ing mono­logues Stew­art and Let­ter­man and Leno did when they returned after 9/11, look up on YouTube Ferguson’s riff not on, but for Brit­ney Spears. The hush that grows over the audi­ence as they real­ize he’s not kid­ding, and the relaxed laugh­ter of sup­port as they warm to where he’s going (and the hon­esty he shows about him­self and his addic­tion his­tory), is really some­thing to watch and lis­ten to.

    But he’s just on so dang late …

    It all feels like the sec­ond half is start­ing after a long, hard-fought first two quar­ters. The score is 21 – 21, and there’s two quar­ters left, but we’re all even and both teams have shown their for­ma­tions and tac­tics (lose the Hail Mary analogy).

    Buckle chin straps and get your game on, and keep it clean. 1 – 2-3-GO-TEAM!!!!!! (I’m antic­i­pat­ing Bears-Colts on Sun­day, can you tell?)

  18. mark said on September 5th, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    I think I found what I came for. Thanks to all. It’s been inter­est­ing, but not par­tic­u­larly earth-shattering.

    This site isn’t a “polit­i­cal blog” but it is vis­ited by a large num­ber of peo­ple who seem to be well-read, well edu­cated and polit­i­cally aware. So why then do so many, when dis­cussing polit­i­cal issues and per­son­al­i­ties, opt for vul­gar­ity, exag­ger­a­tion and threats of cyber vio­lence in place of argu­ment and discussion?

    I’ll divide you into Con­ser­v­a­tives and Lib­er­als, although a few prob­a­bly are nowhere near either pole. The loud­est voices prob­a­bly know which label would be applied to them by an inter­ested observer of the last two or three days, regard­less of the label they might claim as their own. Cs and Ls for ease of reference.

    My con­clu­sion is that the Ls, much more so than the Cs, appar­ently believe and fre­quently assert that the major­ity of peo­ple are stu­pid. Even this topic brought out “the moron por­tion of Amer­ica” com­ment. Per­haps this is why I am a C and sel­dom see eye-to-eye with Ls on polit­i­cal mat­ters. While the major­ity posi­tion is some­times wrong and never cor­rect sim­ply by virtue of major­ity sta­tus, I can’t accept an argu­ment that takes as a premise the estab­lished stu­pid­ity of a major­ity of the peo­ple, or even a sub­stan­tial minor­ity of the peo­ple. I think the vast major­ity of the peo­ple have the intel­lec­tual stuff they need to make rea­soned deci­sions on the things that mat­ter in their lives.

    If there was a group of sim­i­larly well-informed clas­si­cal music enthu­si­asts dis­cussing their pref­er­ences for Mozart or Bach, I think they would present argu­ment for their pref­er­ences rather than resort­ing to “Bach was a sub-human, pan­der­ing bitch who ought to get his ass kicked” or “the knuckle-dragging vio­lin fuck­ers that can’t see past Mozart’s crap…”

    This seems to hap­pen with polit­i­cal issues, though, when some­one (on either side) decides that the only expla­na­tion for dis­agree­ment with his/her opin­ion is the intel­lec­tual or moral infe­ri­or­ity of the per­sons who dis­agree. We are all guilty of this at times. I’ll use “knuck­le­drag­gers” for the Holo­caust deny­ers and the David Duke fol­low­ers, if I respond at all. But I refuse to accept that peo­ple of good faith and rea­son­able intel­li­gence must all be of one mind on issues of tax pol­icy, the Iraq war, global warm­ing and how best to improve pub­lic edu­ca­tion, or a sim­ple pref­er­ence for Obama over McCain.

    For me, what is truly note­wor­thy about this elec­tion is the truly extra­or­di­nary accom­plish­ments and tra­vails of the four top can­di­dates. These are remark­able, amaz­ing peo­ple with whom I am truly fas­ci­nated. Not one in ten at this blog the last few days seems capa­ble of express­ing agree­ment with this sug­ges­tion, as they have already declared their cho­sen “oppo­nents” intel­lec­tu­ally unwor­thy or morally inferior.

    I don’t recall a pres­i­den­tial elec­tion line-up of this cal­iber ever. From the “old guard”, the last of those shaped by the New Deal, World War II, the Cold War and the agony of Viet­nam, we have McCain and Biden. I’d kill to have a steak and a beer with either one of them. Unlike Kerry, either Bush, Gore and (God for­bid) Edwards, I think they would make great neigh­bors and fast friends.

    McCain is a true Amer­i­can hero and when I think of his cap­tiv­ity, I can’t help but ques­tion whether I would have the intel­lect, char­ac­ter and courage to endure and sur­vive his ordeal. (A guy thing, per­haps.) Yet I am sure that Biden would hap­pily spend those years at the Hanoi Hilton if he could thus avoid the pain of the tragic loss of his wife and child and restore an intact fam­ily to his then young sons. I’m equally sure that McCain would think that Biden car­ried the heav­ier load.

    They are plainly flawed men but they rarely pre­tend oth­er­wise. Mccain is a hot­head who val­ues his patri­o­tism a bit too highly; Biden is some­times a blowhard who val­ues his intel­li­gence a bit too highly. Both have had indis­cre­tions and poor judg­ments that played out pub­licly and with­out ben­e­fit of high priv­i­lege to seal records or quash inquiry. (Think Bush 2 and Ted Kennedy). But both are true post-war Amer­i­can suc­cess sto­ries, prod­ucts of hard work, higher edu­ca­tion and strong fam­i­lies. By today’s admit­tedly low stan­dards, they are more than trust­wor­thy pub­lic servants.

    The “new guard” can­di­dates, the chil­dren of the six­ties, are per­haps even more remark­able. At the time of their respec­tive births, it would have been com­pletely implau­si­ble to sug­gest they might be where they are today. They are “mod­ern” Amer­i­can suc­cess sto­ries in every respect and nei­ther one could have achieved such suc­cess, so quickly and despite so many obsta­cles with­out great abil­i­ties, empa­thy and charisma. To attribute their suc­cess to the sup­port of “stu­pid peo­ple” is absurd.

    I give the edge to Obama (from what i have seen) for intel­lect and I will freely admit Palin has no “for­eign pol­icy expe­ri­ence”. But nei­ther one fell into this much suc­cess. Palin is undoubt­edly more of a prag­ma­tist than a reformer when it comes to ear­marks, and Obama’s choice of asso­ciates is curi­ous but not a dis­qual­i­fier or defin­ing of who he is. They each have remark­able fam­i­lies and I think most Amer­i­cans can appre­ci­ate a blue-collar guy who sup­ports a pow­er­ful woman and Michelle Obama’s grace and intel­lect. The south side of Chicago and the tun­dra of Alaska are both chal­leng­ing Amer­i­can frontiers.

    I’ll be vot­ing for McCain/Palin because of pol­icy dis­agree­ments with Obama. I don’t think he’s stu­pid or immoral. I could get into details on the dis­agree­ments, but not with peo­ple who assume my stu­pid­ity or immoral­ity because I dis­agree with them.

  19. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 5th, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    Mark, ya gotta rave a bit more to keep us read­ing some­thing that long. Stream o’ conch-shell rat­tlin’ rip­ple kind of chatter-ear-boxing. Too much “subject-verb-predicate” stuff going on there in yours!

    There’s really only about three “lib­er­als” who get pun­gently pro­fanely peev­ish on a reg­u­lar basis, or even muchly, and even they have their good days and friendly asides. Hang around, throw some bro­mides, and we’ll even read the essays occa­sion­ally. Not that i’m always as brief as i intend when i start typing.

  20. jcburns said on September 5th, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    I don’t know any lib­er­als who think the major­ity of Amer­i­cans are stu­pid, Mark. That’s one of those word-jujitsu divi­sive games some peo­ple play. Let’s not do that here. I don’t see peo­ple doing that here to any­thing like the extent you seem to indicate.

    And I cer­tainly don’t see any­one here mak­ing assump­tions about your stu­pid­ity. Maybe mak­ing assump­tions about the rest of us isn’t cool either…?

    You’ll shed light if you do what you just refused to do: dis­cuss your pol­icy dis­agree­ments with Obama.

    Really. It’s OK. We won’t call you names. Take a deep breath.

  21. Danny said on September 5th, 2008 at 5:06 pm

    Mark, very thought­ful post. Please stop doing that. We don’t like think­ing on Fridays.

    Jok­ing.

    Whew. Looks like this flu is sub­sid­ing. May even try a bike ride to sweat out the remain­ing dregs. JeersCheers, all.

  22. ellen said on September 5th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    That’s rel­a­tively middle-aged, edu­cated work­ing Amer­ica for you, Mark. Inter­est­ing, but not earth-shattering. We are mostly sneak­ing in com­ments while try­ing to work. Hard to achieve earth-shattering between meet­ings or before your boss arrives with yet another project he is cham­pi­oning but you are actu­ally doing.

    Could we have a pool on if/when Sarah Palin is pho­tographed in a pantsuit? Think she will have to go until Novem­ber in panty­hose and pumps? That would make me reject the nom right there.

  23. Dorothy said on September 5th, 2008 at 5:57 pm

    Ach me too, Ellen. Won­der who keeps track of the bot­tle of clear nail pol­ish for her in case she gets a run in those hose?

  24. alex said on September 5th, 2008 at 6:39 pm

    So why then do so many, when dis­cussing polit­i­cal issues and per­son­al­i­ties, opt for vul­gar­ity, exag­ger­a­tion and threats of cyber vio­lence in place of argu­ment and discussion?

    Mark, as a mod­er­ate L liv­ing and work­ing among con­ser­v­a­tive Rs, I see the other side of the coin. Politi­cians are mas­ters of exploit­ing the fears and hatreds of the elec­torate and there’s no deny­ing the GOP is far and away bet­ter at it. After years of silently suf­fer­ing the slings and arrows of peo­ple who every day resort to exactly the same tac­tics you describe above, peo­ple who think Obama’s a Mus­lim and that Iraq per­pe­trated the 9/11 attacks, peo­ple who absorb like a sponge every­thing Rush Lim­baugh or Sean Han­nity says, peo­ple who’ve been given license to ques­tion my patri­o­tism and reli­gios­ity by their own pres­i­dent, it’s impos­si­ble to regard them as benign. True enough, call­ing them stu­pid won’t make them lis­ten to rea­son, but nei­ther will rea­son­ing with them.

    Indeed, I detest get­ting pulled into the mud and being ugly for the sake of win­ning an argu­ment. But I feel com­fort­able vent­ing here among oth­ers who for years have been shar­ing the same kinds of expe­ri­ences. It’s cathar­tic. That’s what you’ve been wit­ness­ing here.

    EDIT: And you should see the stat­u­ary my next-door neigh­bor recently placed in her yard, the kind of thing I didn’t think any­body made any­more. It’s not just Ls who feel embold­ened by the Obama can­di­dacy, I’m afraid. Mark, you think you could find it in your heart to allow me to call my neigh­bor stupid?

  25. coozledad said on September 5th, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Jeff. Danny. Mark.
    Don’t talk to me about vul­gar­ity, or civil­ity, or con­ge­nial­ity. It’s past time for that. Don’t talk to me about babykilling, or being pro life. You voted this in, and you’re not only com­fort­able with it, you’re ready to con­tinue this state of affairs. I’m call­ing you on this one.
    The Eng­lish lan­guage has words for this you don’t like me to use. Per­haps you’d rather me speak a more com­fort­able lan­guage: A harp­ing Sud Deutsch or purring Calvin­ist Gaelic. What­ever.
    You brought this to the world despite our kick­ing and scream­ing.
    You don’t have a shred of con­science about it now, nor will you ever. But you attempt to side­line peo­ple with the inci­vil­ity charge. I can’t put into words what I think of you peo­ple, and it becomes clearer to me every day, it wouldn’t mat­ter if I could.
    Feast on it. This is what you do. This is you.
    http://​www​.pro​gres​siveaustin​.org/​i​r​a​q​i​v​ic.htm

  26. Judith said on September 5th, 2008 at 7:36 pm

    Mark,

    Cer­tainly you find many dif­fer­ing views on this site. Some are dif­fi­cult to read because of the lan­guage. But for you to dis­miss the beliefs of all as to the future direc­tion of our nation because of the words of some writ­ers is shal­low. You say you are a C, does that mean you think Rush Lim­baugh is won­der­ful? Do you agree with every­thing he says? I hope not! There are many who take time to post here who have thoughts for us to pon­der, and some­times new thoughts result. One exam­ple has been the reputi­a­tion of tor­ture in any sit­u­a­tion because it deval­ues America.

  27. Jolene said on September 5th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

    Can any of you writer/teacher/librarian/parent types sug­gest books, games, or soft­ware designed to help late elementary/early middle-school kids learn to spell cor­rectly? Even more com­plex, it’d need to be some­thing that could be used long-distance, although pretty much unlim­ited com­mu­ni­ca­tion by email or phone would be possible.

    I’m try­ing to help my niece, who, unfor­tu­nately, inher­ited her spelling genes from her father rather than the “per­fect speller” genes that her mother carries.

    Am not sure how this will work out, but I thought it might be fun for both of us (she agrees), as well as a way to help her some­what over­whelmed mother.

  28. Danny said on September 5th, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    Jolene, I’ll ask around tonight. Two of my best friends who are com­ing over are teach­ers who also eval­u­ate kids. Also, some­thing else occurs. Check for a mild case of dyslexia. Or eye problems.

    One of my nephews was hav­ing trou­ble until we fig­ured out he needed glasses. Duh!

  29. Danny said on September 5th, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    Jeff. Danny. Mark.
    Don’t talk to me…

    Done.

  30. Dorothy said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    Cooz… can’t we all be adult about this and agree to dis­agree and move on??

  31. coozledad said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    You know some­thing, Nancy comes from that sweet black– soiled Mid­west that con­tributed so many dead boys to the ranks of tomb­stones that led to the fall of my beloved south, and if you’ve never walked a grave path that shrieked of wrong­ful death, you’ve never walked down here.

  32. brian stouder said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    Mark said

    This site isn’t a “polit­i­cal blog” but it is vis­ited by a large num­ber of peo­ple who seem to be well-read, well edu­cated and polit­i­cally aware.

    and I think he’s exactly right about this blog and the gen­eral pro­file of the folks who visit it.

    I think I’d be in 100% agree­ment with Danny and Jeff, if this was 8 years ago; and I’d be in sub­stan­tial agree­ment with them if this was 4 years ago. As it is, I think my polit­i­cal expe­ri­ence is a sort of inverse Rea­gan Demo­c­rat (call me an Obama Republican)

    I really do think Obama will win the pres­i­dency, and that the elec­tion will be a trans­for­ma­tional polit­i­cal event, just as 1980 was (wherein peo­ple re-label them­selves and begin reg­u­larly vot­ing for the other party).….

    but on the other hand, when my 10 year old daugh­ter asked me ‘what if Obama loses and McCain wins’, I told her we’ll have an able states­man in the White House, and I’ll be hop­ing for his suc­cess (this ques­tion was before Palin, about whom I’m much less sanguine!)

    By way of say­ing, I think the posters here­abouts, and not just the national can­di­dates, would all be fun to have a beer (or a Diet Coke!) with;

    and more impor­tantly, I think the polit­i­cal argu­ment goes beyond “L“s and “C“s, if only because I can­not SEE any­thing that I would rec­og­nize as a “C” on the national stage at the moment

  33. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    Ach, Alex, if you’re talk­ing my Hoosier home­land, i fear you’re talk­ing about a lawn jockey? The quiet leg­end in north­ern Indi­ana over my side of the state was that if you put one up, you might just have no taste, but if it had a black face and white rings around the eyes, you were explic­itly telling those in the know that you were Klan.

    Never saw more of that paint pat­tern (not sure if the red vest was part of the sig­nal, but it seemed so) than when i drove thru Elwood, IN, where a regional pas­tor friend, female and African Amer­i­can, was told by a trying-to-be-friendly lady in the women’s fel­low­ship she came to do a day long retreat for, “Honey, just make sure you’re out of town my sun­set, i’d hate for any­one to mis­un­der­stand.” This was in 1985. She told me that story when i was con­sid­er­ing a sem­i­nary place­ment there, and i decided to head for the inner city of of Indy instead.

    Lawn jock­eys still give me the willies.

    [Brian — you’re an Obamacan!]

  34. coozledad said on September 5th, 2008 at 9:58 pm

    This is a loser.Get that grip. I was raised in the petu­lant, racist Fuck You south that is cur­rently the heart of the Repub­li­can party. You are bet­ter than this. Cut these fuck­ers out of your life.

  35. alex said on September 5th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

    Jeff, that’s exactly what I’m talk­ing about. Here in a mid­dle– to upper-middle-class neigh­bor­hood. I haven’t checked for rings around the eyes. I do know that the lady of the house is from Vir­ginia and makes a point of telling me she’s a Repub­li­can. And reg­u­larly attempts to extract info from my hus­band, who tells her noth­ing except that our liv­ing arrange­ment is a finan­cial one.

    The scari­est thing about it is that she doesn’t have the moxy to put in on dis­play for every­body. It’s ensconced in a place where only I can see it. So if I kid­nap it and throw it in the lake, I fully expect there will be retal­i­a­tion and esca­la­tion, which is the last thing I want.

    Oth­er­wise, in the past this lady has given me her cast-offs — boats, arbors, gar­den plant­i­ngs — lots of high-dollar stuff she can’t stand to have around once it starts show­ing the slight­est bit of wear and tear. She dri­ves a newish Cadil­lac crowned with a fake lan­dau top like it wasn’t intended to have (which mit­i­gates in favor of bad taste, not Klans­man­ship). She chopped down all of her trees a la Mr. T, and has urged me to do the same despite the fact that I’ve told her repeat­edly that I moved here for the trees and there’s no way I’d ever remove a sin­gle one.

    She also Chem-Lawns her yard to death and then bitches about all the algae in the lake and how the asso­ci­a­tion does such a shitty job of main­tain­ing it.

    I once had a blog and my tagline was “Notes from the bright side of the cul­tural divide.” That was when I lived in a diverse urban neigh­bor­hood. Right now I’m liv­ing in the thick of the cul­tural wars. Coo­zledad is liv­ing in an even thicker part of it, so I’m per­fectly will­ing to for­give him his excesses, even revel in them, because I empathize.

    I have friends com­ing from Chicago this week­end. I’ve already braced them for the lawn jockey. One of my friends from Chicago is a nurse. The last time she was here she actu­ally helped the lady next door when she crashed her rid­ing lawn mower, cock­tail in hand, and broke her ankle. (She actu­ally did the same thing again recently and her arm’s in a sling.)

    And so ends this dis­patch from the epi­cen­ter of the cul­ture wars.

  36. Suzi said on September 5th, 2008 at 10:31 pm

    Any­one fol­low­ing the Amy Good­man (Democ­racy Now) arrest in St. Paul? She was arrested after two of her pro­duc­ers were arrested video­tap­ing pro­test­ers and cops tussling.

    http://​latimes​blogs​.latimes​.com/​w​a​s​h​i​n​g​t​o​n​/​2​0​0​8​/​0​9​/​a​m​y​-​g​o​o​d​m​a​n​-​a​r​r.html

    There was also a piece on it on David Brancaccio’s Now on PBS tonight — sounded pretty brutal.

  37. brian stouder said on September 5th, 2008 at 10:36 pm

    Alex — yes.

    This year I have learned how it is, to agree with the dreaded Democ­rats ‘back home in Indiana’

  38. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 5th, 2008 at 10:56 pm

    I have to restrain myself when peo­ple in cen­tral Ohio find a lawn jockey at a yard sale, buy it, paint it scar­let and grey, and put a Buckeye’s foot­ball hel­met on the head. It feels wrong on many lev­els, but that’s true for me about Ohio State foot­ball anyhow.

    Kinda like bas­ket­ball in Indi­ana. Y’all know the joke — what’s a Hoosier pervert?

    (will wait to see if any­one knows the punchline)

  39. coozledad said on September 5th, 2008 at 11:00 pm

    Enough.

  40. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 5th, 2008 at 11:06 pm

    A Hoosier per­vert likes sex bet­ter than basketball.

  41. brian stouder said on September 5th, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    haha­ha­haha!!

    The NCAA tour­na­ment is just super cool; espe­cially the open­ing two rounds

  42. Gasman said on September 5th, 2008 at 11:26 pm

    Mark,
    You make my posts look brief by com­par­i­son. I am a no holds barred, bloody knuckle lib­eral and I am damned proud of it. I will stake the record of lib­er­al­ism against that of con­ser­vatism any­time, any­where. What are the great con­ser­v­a­tive accom­plish­ments? Would it be Reagan’s bal­anced bud­get? Or Bush I’s, or Bush II’s? Oh, that’s right, they ran up 70% of this nation’s national debt! So much for the fis­cal respon­si­bil­ity argument.

    Let’s talk national secu­rity. Pres­i­dent Bush has done more for Al Queda recruit­ment than Osama Bin Laden. We were falsely led into a recre­ational war by Viet Nam era chick­en­hawks. How are we now safer? How can you claim that your side sup­ports the troops? Three to five tours of duty for national guard troops? Why? This is not a national emer­gency. It can’t be. There has been no dec­la­ra­tion of war. Your vaunted “Autho­riza­tion of Com­bat” isn’t con­tained in the con­sti­tu­tion. Look it up.

    How about men­dac­ity? Pres­i­dent Bush hasn’t been truth­ful on a sin­gle sub­ject since he has been in office. Do you dis­pute that? If so, pro­vide the sub­ject, and I’m con­fi­dent that I’ll find the lie.

    Is there any point at which you will dis­play out­rage for some­one in the Repub­li­can Party? If the last eight years haven’t done it, what will? I’m try­ing to imag­ine how great the trans­gres­sion must be before you will acknowl­edge the short­com­ings of your party. At what point does national honor trump reflex­ive unthink­ing party loyalty?

    You’ve given essen­tially the same “LIBERALS SUCK” argu­ment. You resort to a truly shabby intel­lec­tual ploy by ignor­ing the ele­phant in the room that is the failed Repub­li­can pol­icy of at least the last eight years. The state that the coun­try is in is because of your party, not mine.

    I’m lookin’ for­ward to the election.

  43. Gasman said on September 6th, 2008 at 12:33 am

    Mark,
    P.S. — Please note, I didn’t call you stu­pid or use any vul­gar­ity. I believe that my pre­vi­ous post, as my oth­ers, is spe­cific as to my crit­i­cisms of the right. I object to spe­cific con­duct and poli­cies, not just party. If any­one in my party behaves like­wise, I guar­an­tee that I will be as vocif­er­ous toward them. But until Repub­li­cans clean up their act, I will call them on their record.

    BTW, as a pro­fes­sional clas­si­cal musi­cian, I laughed hard at the “Bach was a sub-human, pan­der­ing bitch” line. Those are words that have prob­a­bly never before existed in the same sentence.

  44. ROgirl said on September 6th, 2008 at 7:19 am

    Re: the “uppity” quote

    For cer­tain peo­ple it just pops up in nor­mal con­ver­sa­tion, and oops, they said it in front of a reporter, and now they’re backpedal­ing, they didn’t really mean it the way it came out. But nobody is fooled for a second.

    Re: Kwame

    Is it a coin­ci­dence that this has been hap­pen­ing when the auto indus­try is in the worst tail­spin we’ve seen in recent mem­ory? I sup­pose it’s on a small scale com­pared with the president’s assort­ment of big fat lies and out­ra­geous spend­ing to cover his ass. It just seems more per­sonal (and sad too) for those of us who live here. Detroit has a chip on its shoul­der for a rea­son, but this just makes it a lot higher.

  45. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 6th, 2008 at 8:29 am

    Since i know there are other green bean fans here’bouts, and since this week’s col­umn thought started here (yes, even in the mid­dle of the polit­i­cal ten­sions), please for­give a momen­tary self-indulgent link:
    http://​www​.newarkad​vo​cate​.com/​a​p​p​s​/​p​b​c​s​.​d​l​l​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​?​A​I​D​=​/​2​0​0​8​0​9​0​6​/​L​I​F​E​S​T​Y​L​E​/​8​0​9​0​6​0​3​3​3/1024

  46. alex said on September 6th, 2008 at 9:14 am

    Green beans in a pres­sure cooker? With a cou­pla strips of bacon thrown in? Yes, I know that smell.

  47. basset said on September 6th, 2008 at 9:35 am

    Green beans canned in a Ball jar with new pota­toes and a cou­pla strips of bacon… big steam­ing bowl of ‘em on the table, corn­bread on the side and the first snow of win­ter just start­ing to fall.

  48. Danny said on September 6th, 2008 at 10:07 am

    bas­set, I just woke up and read that and my mouth is water­ing. I don’t think I’ll get the snow here though. May have to turn up the air con­di­tioner dur­ing the next wild­fire and pre­tend the white ash falling is snow.

    Gas­man, what instrument(s) do you play?

  49. crinoidgirl said on September 6th, 2008 at 10:54 am

    Jeff -
    What is a “sup­ply preacher”?

  50. moe99 said on September 6th, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    Joe Biden delin­ieates the divide between R and D as well as anyone.

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​9​5​5​Y​3​NJTRIE

    Damn straight, Joe!!!

  51. Danny said on September 6th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Actu­ally, not so straight, Moe.

    Biden, about 1:20 in, said that they did not men­tion the “mid­dle­class” or “jobs” or “health­care” at the Repub­li­can Con­ven­tion and that is flatly false (though, for the record, I thought it was pretty stu­pid what McCain had to say about jobs, but they did talk about it at the convention).

    Also, Biden crit­i­cizes Palin for sar­cas­tic quips. That’s rich. Biden wal­lows in sar­casm usu­ally. It’s his main rhetor­i­cal device. Same with the com­men­ta­tors on MSNBC and also many here at NN.C. But when Palin uses it, oh no, sud­denly every­one devel­opes an allergy to sar­casm. Get real.

  52. moe99 said on September 6th, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Troop­er­gate Inves­ti­ga­tion sought to be shut down by republicans:

    http://​www​.wash​ing​ton​monthly​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​i​n​d​i​v​i​d​u​a​l​/​2​0​0​8​_​0​9​/​0​1​4​5​90.php

    Danny – you got any­thing bet­ter than that? I think Joe per­fectly encap­su­lated the dif­fer­ences in the R and D con­ven­tions. The Rs now have a cult of per­son­al­ity going to rival what they said was Obama’s. Now why do you think that they went for the Peo­ple mag­a­zine ver­sion of cam­paign­ing rather than high­light­ing the issues and their pro­posed poli­cies? Could it be that they are bank­rupt on that score?

  53. Danny said on September 6th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

    Moe, you posted a 3 minute video and said it was “damn straight.” I demon­strated that it was not by list­ing three false state­ments about 1 minute in and then a ques­tion­able quip about “quips.” What more do you want?

  54. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 6th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    Crinoid­girl (awe­some screen name, btw) — i stepped out of “pul­pit min­istry” at the end of 2004, which is one way of say­ing “set­tled pas­tor” or the guy who’s hired to be the par­son. Now i’m a church mem­ber like any­one else, but ordained and main­tain­ing min­is­te­r­ial stand­ing so i can “fill in” for pas­tors on vaca­tion or on leave or tomor­row, for a pas­tor who had a sud­den health prob­lem come up.

    Which is dif­fer­ent from an “interim min­is­ter” who takes a church pul­pit for months, up to two years, while they look for a new pas­tor. I don’t leave the area (except as part of doing workshops/trainings/consulting-coachin events), and just do a week or two at a time where needed.

    And since i’m ecu­ma­ni­a­cal, i get to do Dis­ci­ples of Christ one week, high church Lutheran the next, rural UCC Ger­man her­itage parish a bit after that, and on a mid­dle school stage for a Methodist new church start fur­ther on. Mainly, i help pas­tors feel OK about going on vaca­tion with­out wor­ry­ing about what’s going on or who’s bury­ing the dead while they get some down time.

    Love the screen name …

  55. alex said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    Were we watch­ing the same con­ven­tion, Danny?

  56. LA Mary said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Jeff, on Thurs­day my employ­ers encour­aged all employ­ees who could rea­son­able leave their posts (I work in a hos­pi­tal) to go out­side and see Arnold the Gov make a speech. It was hot and Arnold was late, and every­one in scrubs or a lab jacket was moved to a spot that would be in the news­cam­era shot of the Arnold speak­ing. I was hang­ing out with my Spir­i­tual Care depart­ment friends dis­cussing what we could do to get into the shot. One of the priests said he could go get some of his fancy priest hats, includ­ing Byzan­tine rite hats, and maybe that would get the camera’s atten­tion. We nearly talked him into it, which I think would have made for a great photo, but he chose to not get into trou­ble with the spir­i­tual pow­ers that be. We did have our Rabbi, Devo­rah McDon­ald, wear­ing a yarmulke, though.

  57. LA Mary said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Green beans…
    They have some stuff at Trader Joes, Thai green curry sauce. It’s allowed me to get through the sum­mer. The cur­rent fave din­ner here is chicken thighs, cut up red pota­toes and either green beans, spinach, or sum­mer squash. Cook the chicken and pota­toes in a deep skil­let with a lid, throw in the veg­etable of choice with a lit­tle water or broth, then dump in tow or three jars of the curry sauce and fin­ish cook­ing the whole mess. Serve with melon or man­goes or peaches or all three. Whole thing takes about 20 min­utes and tastes very exotic.

  58. Julie Robinson said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Ecu­ma­ni­a­cal? Was that a typo or deliberate?

  59. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Ecu­ma­ni­a­cal was inten­tional, lame attempt at humor (my wife, when in earshot of that one, rolls eyes fetch­ingly — she’s heard it a few dozen times).

    LAMary, some­one once did a good piece on why The Epis­co­pal Church gets so much more cov­er­age than their size and rel­a­tive social clout nowa­days would war­rant, and the con­sen­sus was “cos­tum­ing.” Priests of the Angli­can Com­mu­nion have great vest­ments and know how to use them. Shirt­sleeve guys in churches that “look like a ware­house” (hon­estly, can we ban that phrase?) just don’t pho­to­graph as well unless they wear Hawai­ian shirts and sell 35 mil­lion copies of a book.

  60. basset said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:55 pm

    will have to look for some of that sauce as soon as our first Trader Joe’s opens here in Nashville… they have a build­ing with a big “Com­ing Soon” ban­ner on the front and cur­rently are wran­gling with the plan­ning com­mis­sion over what kind of signs they can put up.

    no Two Buck Chuck though, can’t sell wine in gro­cery stores in Tennessee.

  61. moe99 said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Speak­ing of ecu­ma­ni­a­cal, the Catholic Church is now call­ing Nancy Pelosi in to the archibishop’s office for her stand on abortion.

    At least it’s not an auto da fe:

    http://​tinyurl​.com/​5c9hxj

    Oh and Danny, I stand by my state­ments. You have given noth­ing of quotes made by either McCain or Palin (who by the way are try­ing to now kill the troop­er­gate inves­ti­ga­tion – pre­dictable in my book, after all IOKIYAR) con­cern­ing con­crete pro­pos­als made on those issues men­tioned by Biden. Here’s what Obama had to say in his nom­i­na­tion speech:

    I will stop giv­ing tax breaks to com­pa­nies that ship jobs over­seas, and I will start giv­ing them to com­pa­nies that cre­ate good jobs right here in America.…

    I’ll elim­i­nate cap­i­tal gains taxes for the small busi­nesses and start-ups that will cre­ate the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.…

    I will — lis­ten now — I will cut taxes — cut taxes — for 95 per­cent of all work­ing fam­i­lies, because, in an econ­omy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the mid­dle class.…

    And for the sake of our econ­omy, our secu­rity, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as pres­i­dent: In 10 years, we will finally end our depen­dence on oil from the Mid­dle East.…

    As pres­i­dent, as pres­i­dent, I will tap our nat­ural gas reserves, invest in clean coal tech­nol­ogy, and find ways to safely har­ness nuclear power. I’ll help our auto com­pa­nies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America.…

    I’ll invest $150 bil­lion over the next decade in afford­able, renew­able sources of energy — wind power, and solar power, and the next gen­er­a­tion of bio­fu­els — an invest­ment that will lead to new indus­tries and 5 mil­lion new jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced.…

    I’ll invest in early child­hood edu­ca­tion. I’ll recruit an army of new teach­ers, and pay them higher salaries, and give them more sup­port. And in exchange, I’ll ask for higher stan­dards and more accountability.

    And we will keep our promise to every young Amer­i­can: If you com­mit to serv­ing your com­mu­nity or our coun­try, we will make sure you can afford a col­lege education.…

    If you have health care — if you have health care, my plan will lower your pre­mi­ums. If you don’t, you’ll be able to get the same kind of cov­er­age that mem­bers of Con­gress give themselves.

    And — and as some­one who watched my mother argue with insur­ance com­pa­nies while she lay in bed dying of can­cer, I will make cer­tain those com­pa­nies stop dis­crim­i­nat­ing against those who are sick and need care the most.

    Now is the time to help fam­i­lies with paid sick days and bet­ter fam­ily leave, because nobody in Amer­ica should have to choose between keep­ing their job and car­ing for a sick child or an ail­ing parent.

    Now is the time to change our bank­ruptcy laws, so that your pen­sions are pro­tected ahead of CEO bonuses, and the time to pro­tect Social Secu­rity for future generations.

    And now is the time to keep the promise of equal pay for an equal day’s work, because I want my daugh­ters to have the exact same oppor­tu­ni­ties as your sons.

    Now, many of these plans will cost money, which is why I’ve laid out how I’ll pay for every dime: by clos­ing cor­po­rate loop­holes and tax havens that don’t help Amer­ica grow.

    But I will also go through the fed­eral bud­get line by line, elim­i­nat­ing pro­grams that no longer work and mak­ing the ones we do need work bet­ter and cost less, because we can­not meet 21st-century chal­lenges with a 20th-century bureaucracy.…”

    I didn’t hear any­thing quite that con­crete w/ McCain’s speech or Palin’s.

  62. Jeff (the mild-mannered one) said on September 6th, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Idiot alert — if you make pizza dough, roll it out, throw chicken and pep­per­oni on it (the boy must have pep­per­oni) over the sauce, and then hand­fuls of grated mozz, DON’T put lots of fresh basil leaves on top when you first insert into oven.

    As any fore­thought might tell you, unless they go under the cheese or in later, close to the end of the cook­ing, they crisp and curl and brown. D’oh …

    I’m not Catholic in doc­trine or in prac­tice, but Speaker Pelosi kinda forced the issue (that most bish­ops pre­fer to qui­etly avoid) when she tried to point out to Tom Brokaw on Meet The Press that Catholic teach­ing was vari­able and open on abor­tion. Pushed a but­ton she did, so they have to call her on it. I’m sur­prised she went there, unless she wanted a note from her bishop in the mail. If so, she’s got her hall pass to the principal’s office now.

  63. LA Mary said on September 6th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    Our Epis­co­pal chap­lain is a woman, and prob­a­bly my best friend at work. She han­dles the pal­lia­tive care pro­gram as well. The Roman Rite/Byzantine Rite priest has the same last name as Madonna. I asked him once if they were related, and he said prob­a­bly way back in the old coun­try, but he didn’t know her. He did invite her to his ordi­na­tion and was very dis­ap­pointed she didn’t show up.

  64. moe99 said on September 6th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    And now McCain’s folks are LYING about the gaffe involv­ing the the pic­ture of Wal­ter Reed Mid­dle School which was fea­tured behind him dur­ing his speech. Is there noth­ing to small that these folks don’t lie about?

    http://​the​cau​cus​.blogs​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​9​/​0​5​/​w​a​l​t​e​r​-​reede/

  65. beb said on September 6th, 2008 at 4:03 pm

    ROgirl asks:
    “Re: Kwame
    Is it a coincidence…”

    I think it’s because Detroit is a one party town. There’s no com­pe­ti­tion, not even com­pet­ing fac­tions to keep the rul­ing party from doing what it damn well pleases. That’s why Kwane thought he could ride this out — who was going to pin him down?

  66. LA Mary said on September 6th, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    I’m not buy­ing the McCain cam­paign story. If they wanted a stan­dard pub­lic school photo, there’s John Mar­shall High, which has been used in com­mer­cials and movies for years.

    http://​www​.movie​-loca​tions​.com/​m​o​v​i​e​s​/​b​/​b​u​f​f​y.html

    It’s about six miles from Wal­ter Reed.

  67. brian stouder said on September 6th, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    Despite that The Pro­pri­etress dis­agrees, I still sus­pect that there’s some­thing more to the story of the sud­denly long-winded and ad-libbing Rudy, and the resul­tant short-shrift given to Gov­er­nor Palin’s intro­duc­tory video, on the big-big night that she was unveiled to the nation. My guess is that some egre­gious thing was in there that they needed to excise.…and the foul-up with the school pic­ture (and the resul­tant green-green back­drop for the pal­lid head of Palin’s ticket) only rein­forces that suspicion.

    For another exam­ple of the wob­bly nature of the GOP’s con­ven­tion, which has a local (to Fort Wayne) hook, see Mitch Harper’s blog at

    http://​indi​ana​.type​pad​.com/fwob/

    It seems that one of the Code Pink party crash­ers who inter­rupted Gov­er­nor Palin’s address gained access to the floor using the cre­den­tials of one of our local alter­nate delegates!

  68. Danny said on September 6th, 2008 at 5:04 pm

    Oh and Danny, I stand by my state­ments. You have given noth­ing of quotes made by either McCain or Palin

    Moe, you can stand by your state­ments all you want, but I have shown you to be wrong. It doesn’t mat­ter. You’re safe here. No one (else) will call you on it.

    And regard­ing quotes from McCain and Palin, I was never asked to give any, so why would I have? We were talk­ing about Biden not being so “damn straight.” Remember?

  69. brian stouder said on September 6th, 2008 at 5:17 pm

    Moe, you can stand by your state­ments all you want…

    agreed

    but I have shown you to be wrong.

    no.

    This is why we hold elec­tions, yes? Right or Wrong get decided by what majori­ties of peo­ple in states with the cor­rect total of elec­toral votes think.

    In this par­tic­u­lar dis­cus­sion, I agree with moe, but there are any num­ber of folks who will agree with your assess­ment, Danny. In 8 weeks, we’ll see who was right

  70. Danny said on September 6th, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    Brian, I’m not sure you were fol­low­ing the dis­cus­sion closely enough. Moe stated that Biden was being straight in that video. about 1:20 into it he said that at the Repub­li­can Con­ven­tion they never talked about the mid­dle­class, jobs or health­care. But all one has to do is go to the tran­scripts to see that was not so. McCain def­i­nitely talked about all three.

  71. brian stouder said on September 6th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    Danny, I will grant the point that those terms were men­tioned by var­i­ous speak­ers at the GOP con­ven­tion. If that is strictly what this dis­cus­sion is about, then you are indeed and unas­sail­ably correct.

    What I recall about that con­ven­tion was that we were being assured that the econ­omy was fine, and that the Democ­rats would surely foul up the good thing we have going…which struck me as will­fully disin­gen­u­ous and “not straight”, whereas Biden’s com­ments struck me as very straight. (and indeed, the out-of-power folks will always attack the sta­tus quo, while the incum­bents will always defend it. It WAS inter­est­ing to watch the sup­port­ers of the excit­ing Palin and her pal­lid “straight talk­ing” pres­i­den­tial nom­i­nee try to both claim that all is well, while vig­or­ously dis­own­ing the extant Repub­li­can party!!)

    IMO, Biden was the straight-talking one, but we shall see.

    Here’s an aside for Jeff -

    http://​blog​.beliefnet​.com/​g​o​d​s​p​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​2​0​0​8​/​0​9​/​p​a​l​i​n​-​o​w​e​s​-​s​o​m​e​-​g​o​o​d​-​p​e​o​p​l​e​-​a​n.html

    Here’s a cou­ple inter­est­ing excerpts:

    Wednes­day morn­ing I got an e-mail from a for­mer mem­ber of our Sojourn­ers com­mu­nity. Perry Perkins is now a com­mu­nity orga­nizer in Louisiana with affil­i­ates of the Indus­trial Areas Foun­da­tion (IAF). “Perk,” as we used to call him, reported on the enor­mous con­se­quences of 2 mil­lion peo­ple being evac­u­ated because of Hur­ri­cane Gus­tav, much of the state now being with­out power, how hard cities like Baton Rouge were hit, the tens of thou­sands of peo­ple in shel­ters and churches, and the con­tin­u­ing prob­lems caused by heavy rains and flood­ing. Then he talked about how their com­mu­nity orga­niz­ers were respond­ing to all of this — respond­ing to hun­dreds of ser­vice calls, assist­ing local offi­cials in evac­u­a­tion plans, aid­ing evac­uees with­out trans­porta­tion, coor­di­nat­ing shel­ters and open­ing new ones, pro­vid­ing food, essen­tial ser­vices, and finan­cial aid to those in most need. Since Kat­rina, Perry’s Louisiana inter­faith orga­ni­za­tions have played a lead role in secur­ing mil­lions of dol­lars to help thou­sands of fam­i­lies return to New Orleans and rebuild their homes and their lives.

    and the money quote -

    Palin’s effort to attack the expe­ri­ence of Barack Obama, a for­mer com­mu­nity orga­nizer in Chicago, turned into a bad joke and an insult. Palin owes a lot of good peo­ple an apology.

  72. brian stouder said on September 6th, 2008 at 6:12 pm

    Say, speak­ing of owed-apologies and so on, here’s a tried and true cheap shot, thanks to the same folks who den­i­grated John Kerry’s ser­vice to his coun­try, before insist­ing (this year) that ONLY John McCain has ever really and truly “fought” for us!

    http://​www​.den​ver​post​.com/​c​i​_​1​0​3​9​8​8​3​0​?​s​o​u​r​ce=rss

    an excerpt:

    This morn­ing, Repub­li­cans tell me that a worker at Invesco Field in Den­ver saved thou­sands of unused flags from the Demo­c­ra­tic National Con­ven­tion that were headed for the garbage. Guer­rilla cam­paign­ing. They will use these flags at their own event today in Col­orado Springs with John McCain and Sarah Palin.

    Before McCain speaks today, vet­er­ans will haul these garbage bags filled with flags out onto the stage — with dra­matic effect, no doubt — and tell the story. “What you see in the pic­ture I sent you is less than half of total flags,” a Repub­li­can offi­cial emailed. “We esti­mate the total num­ber to be around 12,000 small flags and one full size 3×5 flag.”

    Because, of course, it gives Democ­rats orgas­mic plea­sure to phys­i­cally mis­treat the Amer­i­can flag, don­cha’ know? “They” all hate Amer­ica and are flatly unpa­tri­otic, as “we” all know, right? And, John McCain wasn’t gonna impugn the patri­o­tism of his opponent.…at least until he did! (sorta like Gov Palin’s oppo­si­tion to ear­marks, except when the ear­marked pork is headed her way!)

    Well, we’ll see if this sort of stuff works again, soon enough.

  73. moe99 said on September 7th, 2008 at 2:09 am

  74. Gasman said on September 7th, 2008 at 5:46 am

    For all of you McCain sup­port­ers, please visit my post on the next thread. (#comment-208167) “Straight Talk” express my ass.

  75. brian stouder said on September 7th, 2008 at 10:15 am

    Moe — yes­ter­day the young folks and I stopped at a McDon­alds that has a foozball game (amongst other things aimed at kids that are a lit­tle older) and TVs set to Fox news, and your excel­lent link to TPM reminded me that THAT’S where I first saw this story. When we got back home, I googled flags and DNC, and found the arti­cle which I linked above.

    Sen­a­tor Obama should hit this spe­cific issue HARD. McCain per­son­ally got involved in this smear, and he should be made to pay for it.

    (and speak­ing of mak­ing peo­ple pay, as one reads the follow-up news, it appears that these flags were STOLEN by the GOP oper­a­tives!! even if they were only 25 cents each, that’s a $3,000 theft.…and if you swipe $3,000 worth of stuff from Best Buy, you’re going to prison!)